DOCSLIB.ORG

QED Membership Brochure Draft 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
QED Membership Brochure Draft 2020 MakeMembership your voice heard & be part of the dialogue! We believe that through“ discussion and debate we can create better understanding and in the end better policy making. ” About QED QED is an independent meeting organiser specialised in creating a forum for dialogue between policymakers, regulators, NGOs, and companies. By inviting representatives from all sides of the discussion we make sure that the debate is balanced and focused on the relevant issues. QED was created in Brussels for the Brussels arena. As an event organiser, our main focus is European Affairs. At our QED events, we are both the initiator and the organiser. We act as a provider of a neutral platform, identifying important legislative proposals and ensuring a balanced debate focused on the issues at hand. Type of QED events Conferences Lunch debates Round-table discussions Seminars Virtual events Bespoke events by QED means - hosting events that stand out, while getting more time to focus on your core activities by letting us help you! 52,6 % Composition Private Stakeholders of audience % 7,4 % Journalists 13,3 European Parliament 12,6 % Permanent Representation to the EU 11,1 % European % 3 Commission Others Examples of speakers at previous events John Berrigan Director General, DG FISMA, European Commission Dr Dirk Haubrich Head of Conduct, Payments and Consumers, European Banking Paul P. Andrews Secretary General, IOSCO Authority Paulina Dejmek Hack Member of Cabinet of President Jean-Claude Juncker, Ulrich Bindseil Director General Market Infrastructure & Payments, ECB European Commission Carsten Osterman Head of Trading Unit, ESMA Martin Merlin Director, Dir D - Regulation and prudential supervision of Martina Drvar Vice Governor, Croatian National Bank financial institutions, DG FISMA, European Commission Maureen K Ohlhausen Commissioner, US Federal Trade Commission Ugo Bassi Director, Dir C - Financial Markets, DG FISMA, European Commission Roel Campos Former SEC Commissioner, Member of President Obama’s Presidential Intelligence Advisory Board, Partner, Head of Securities Regulation and Enforcement, Mario Nava Director, Directorate H – Financial Institutions, DG MARKT, Locke Lord LLP European Commission Wilko Bolt Senior Economist, Dutch Central Bank Marcel Haag Director, Dir B Horizontal policies, DG FISMA, European Commission Carlos Carriedo Senior Vice President/General Manager Europe, Global Commercial Tilman Lueder Head of unit C3 - Securities Markets, DG FISMA, European Commission Services, American Express Almorò Rubin de Cervin Head of Unit A4 - International Affairs, DG FISMA, Javier Perez President, Mastercard Europe European Commission Paul Schott Stevens President & CEO, Investment Company Institute Patrick Pearson Head of Unit C2 - Financial Markets Infrastructure, DG FISMA, Guillaume Prache Managing Director, Better Finance European Commission Andreas Hagenbring Managing Director, AirPlus Eric Ducoulombier Head of Unit B3 - Retail financial services, DG FISMA, Mark Nelsen Senior Vice President Open Banking, VISA European Commission Alexandra Hachmeister Managing Director Market Data and Services at Martin Spolc Head of Unit, Financial technology and sustainable finance Deutsche Börse Group DG FISMA, European Commission Andrew Douglas Chief Executive, European Trade Repository & MD, Government Pēteris Zilgavis Head of Unit, Digital Innovation and Blockchain, Digital Single Market, Relations, DTCC DG Connect; Co-Chair, FinTech Task Force, European Commission Olivier Boutellis-Taft Chief Executive, Accountancy Europe Tatyana Panova Head Unit B1 - Capital Markets Union, DG FISMA, Jason Lane Executive Vice President, Market Development Europe, Mastercard European Commission Lars Sjögren CEO, P27 Nordic Payments Othmar Karas Vice President of the European Parliament Pedro Silva Pereira Vice President of the European Parliament Markus Ferber Member of the European Parliament Axel Voss Member of the European Parliament Danuta Hübner Member of the European Parliament Paul Tang Member of the European Parliament Eva Kaili Member of the European Parliament QED Members QED Associate Members Benefits from being a QED Member Member Associate Member Make your voice heard! Be part of the dialogue! Annual fee Annual fee 6,900 euros 1,400 euros One speaking opportunity at one of our events throughout the year (more details on the next page). Number of delegates from your organisation participating at no cost 3 delegates 2 delegates for all our events. 20% reduction for any additional delegates. Mingle & network possibilities with important policy makers and stakeholders. Participation in our members-only round-table discussion with policy makers. Participate in our “by-invitation-only” networking events. Possibility to give input on our agenda and to suggest topics for upcoming QED events. Reduction on sponsorship at our QED events. This includes, among other things increased visibility with your logo on the invitation and other event marketing material. Reduced price for bespoke events (20%)* * Reduced price on event management services provided by QED, excluding costs for subcontractors, venue, catering or any other services provided by a third party. The membership discount cannot be combined with any other reductions or campaign offers Speaking opportunity Speaking at a QED event typically includes the following*: A 10 minutes presentation Participation in the panel discussion Concluding remarks with key policy makers 2 additional delegates A position paper included in Stress your positions to key the event app EU policy makers Continued visibility at qed.eu * May vary depending on the event format. Membership confirmation As a confirmation of your membership in QED, we kindly ask you to complete and signthe form below and return it by email to [email protected]. Your membership will last for one year from the date of signature. Annual memership fees: Membership: € 6.900 (includes one speaking opportunity) Associate membership: € 1.400 Upgrades to your membership (optional): One additional speaking opportunity: € 4.000 (save € 500) Two additional speaking opportunities: € 8.000 (save € 1.000) Organisation: Contact person: Invoicing address: Postal code: City: Country: VAT number: Telephone: Email: Signature: Date: I have received and taken note of QED’s privacy policy and understand the conditions under which QED processes my personal data. * All prices are excluding VAT. PROMOTING EUROPEAN DIALOGUE www.qed.eu [email protected] | +32 (0)2 280 42 72 | Rue de Spa 30, 1000 Brussels.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • European Parliament: 7Th February 2017 Redistribution of Political Balance
    POLICY PAPER European issues n°420 European Parliament: 7th February 2017 redistribution of political balance Charles de Marcilly François Frigot At the mid-term of the 8th legislature, the European Parliament, in office since the elections of May 2014, is implementing a traditional “distribution” of posts of responsibility. Article 19 of the internal regulation stipulates that the Chairs of the parliamentary committees, the Deputy-Chairs, as well as the questeurs, hold their mandates for a renewable 2 and a-half year period. Moreover, internal elections within the political groups have supported their Chairs, whilst we note that there has been some slight rebalancing in terms of the coordinators’ posts. Although Italian citizens draw specific attention with the two main candidates in the battle for the top post, we should note other appointments if we are to understand the careful balance between nationalities, political groups and individual experience of the European members of Parliament. A TUMULTUOUS PRESIDENTIAL provide collective impetus to potential hesitations on the part of the Member States. In spite of the victory of the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European elections, it supported Martin As a result the election of the new President of Schulz in July 2104 who stood for a second mandate as Parliament was a lively[1] affair: the EPP candidate – President of the Parliament. In all, with the support of the Antonio Tajani – and S&D Gianni Pittella were running Liberals (ADLE), Martin Schulz won 409 votes following neck and neck in the fourth round of the relative an agreement concluded by the “grand coalition” after majority of the votes cast[2].
    [Show full text]
  • En En Draft Agenda
    European Parliament 2019 - 2024 Committee on Legal Affairs JURI(2020)1116_1 DRAFT AGENDA Meeting Monday 16 November 2020, 9.00 – 11.00 and 11.30 – 12.30 and 13.45 – 15.45 Brussels Room: József Antall (4Q1) 16 November 2020, 9.00 – 11.00 1. Adoption of agenda 2. Chair’s announcements 9.05 - Checking the quorum *** Voting time *** 3. Sustainable corporate governance JURI/9/03635 2020/2137(INI) Rapporteur: Pascal Durand (Renew) PR – PE655.848v01-00 AM – PE658.892v01-00 Responsible: JURI OJ\PE660246v01-00en.rtf PE660.246v01-00 EN United in diversityEN Opinions: INTA Heidi Hautala (Verts/ALE) AD – PE655.716v03-00 AM – PE657.472v01-00 ECON Decision: no opinion EMPL Decision: no opinion ENVI Pascal Canfin (Renew) AD – PE658.727v02-00 AM – PE658.927v01-00 Adoption of draft report Deadline for tabling amendments:7 October 2020, 12.00 4. Representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers JURI/9/02015 ***II 2018/0089(COD) 09573/1/2020 – C9-0355/2020 T8-0222/2019 Rapporteur: Geoffroy Didier (PPE) PR – PE659.054v01-00 Responsible: JURI Adoption of draft recommendation for second reading 5. Service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (service of documents) JURI/9/02017 ***II 2018/0204(COD) 09890/2/2020 – C9-0356/2020 T8-0104/2019 Rapporteur: Franco Roberti (S&D) PR – PE660.172v01-00 Responsible: JURI Adoption of draft recommendation for second reading 6. Cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters JURI/9/02016 ***II 2018/0203(COD) 09889/2/2020 – C9-0357/2020 T8-0103/2019 Rapporteur: Emil Radev (PPE) PR – PE660.171v01-00 Responsible: JURI Adoption of draft recommendation for second reading In camera 7.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Look at the New European Parliament Page 1 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMITTEE (INTA)
    THE NEW EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT KEY COMMITTEE COMPOSITION 31 JULY 2019 INTRODUCTION After several marathon sessions, the European Council agreed on the line-up for the EU “top jobs” on 2 July 2019. The deal, which notably saw German Defence Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU, EPP) surprisingly designated as the next European Commission (EC) President, meant that the European Parliament (EP) could proceed with the election of its own leadership on 3 July. The EPP and Renew Europe (formerly ALDE) groups, in line with the agreement, did not present candidates for the EP President. As such, the vote pitted the S&D’s David-Maria Sassoli (IT) against two former Spitzenkandidaten – Ska Keller (DE) of the Greens and Jan Zahradil (CZ) of the ACRE/ECR, alongside placeholder candidate Sira Rego (ES) of GUE. Sassoli was elected President for the first half of the 2019 – 2024 mandate, while the EPP (presumably EPP Spitzenkandidat Manfred Weber) would take the reins from January 2022. The vote was largely seen as a formality and a demonstration of the three largest Groups’ capacity to govern. However, Zahradil received almost 100 votes (more than the total votes of the ECR group), and Keller received almost twice as many votes as there are Greens/EFA MEPs. This forced a second round in which Sassoli was narrowly elected with just 11 more than the necessary simple majority. Close to 12% of MEPs did not cast a ballot. MEPs also elected 14 Vice-Presidents (VPs): Mairead McGuinness (EPP, IE), Pedro Silva Pereira (S&D, PT), Rainer Wieland (EPP, DE), Katarina Barley (S&D, DE), Othmar Karas (EPP, AT), Ewa Kopacz (EPP, PL), Klara Dobrev (S&D, HU), Dita Charanzová (RE, CZ), Nicola Beer (RE, DE), Lívia Járóka (EPP, HU) and Heidi Hautala (Greens/EFA, FI) were elected in the first ballot, while Marcel Kolaja (Greens/EFA, CZ), Dimitrios Papadimoulis (GUE/NGL, EL) and Fabio Massimo Castaldo (NI, IT) needed the second round.
    [Show full text]
  • 16.6.2020 A9-0117/25 Amendment 25 Christophe
    16.6.2020 A9-0117/25 Amendment 25 Christophe Hansen, David McAllister on behalf of the PPE Group Kati Piri, Pedro Silva Pereira, Bernd Lange, Paolo De Castro on behalf of the S&D Group Nathalie Loiseau, Liesje Schreinemacher on behalf of the Renew Group Heidi Hautala, Sergey Lagodinsky on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Report A9-0117/2020 Kati Piri, Christophe Hansen European Parliament recommendation on the negotiations for a new partnership with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (2020/2023(INI)) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 Motion for a resolution Amendment 17. Recalls that Article 132 of the 17. Recalls that Article 132 of the Withdrawal Agreement provides the Withdrawal Agreement provides the possibility for the Joint Committee to adopt possibility for the Joint Committee to adopt a decision extending the transition period by 30 June 2020 a decision extending the beyond 31 December 2020; transition period beyond 31 December 2020; acknowledges the UK’s decision, following the Joint Committee meeting of 12 June 2020, not to consider an extension of the transition period; underlines that the EU remains open to such an extension; Or. en AM\1207745EN.docx PE647.678v01-00 EN United in diversityEN 16.6.2020 A9-0117/26 Amendment 26 Christophe Hansen, David McAllister on behalf of the PPE Group Kati Piri, Pedro Silva Pereira, Bernd Lange, Paolo De Castro on behalf of the S&D Group Nathalie Loiseau, Liesje Schreinemacher on behalf of the Renew Group Heidi Hautala, Sergey Lagodinsky on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group Report A9-0117/2020 Kati Piri, Christophe Hansen European Parliament recommendation on the negotiations for a new partnership with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (2020/2023(INI)) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 Motion for a resolution Amendment 20.
    [Show full text]
  • 068517/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt Am 09/07/21
    068517/EU XXVII. GP Eingelangt am 09/07/21 Council of the European Union Brussels, 9 July 2021 (OR. en) 10606/21 PE-RE 9 'I/A' ITEM NOTE From: General Secretariat of the Council To: Permanent Representatives Committee/Council Subject: RESOLUTIONS and DECISIONS adopted by the European Parliament at its plenary part-session in Strasbourg from 5 to 8 July 2021 The Council is invited to take note of the following acts adopted by the European Parliament. At the above mentioned part-session, the European Parliament adopted 43 acts1 as follows : – 15 legislative acts – 28 non-legislative acts I. LEGISLATIVE ACTS A. ORDINARY LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURE First reading 1. Use of technologies for the processing of data for the purpose of combating online child sexual abuse (temporary derogation from Directive 2002/58/EC) Report: Birgit Sippel (A9-0258/2020) European Parliame nt legisla tive resolutio n P9_TA(2021)0319 2. Recognition of third countries certificates in inland navigation Report: Andris Ameriks (A9-0210/2021) European Parliame nt legisla tive resolutio n P9_TA(2021)0320 1 To consult the acts, Ctrl + click on the hyperlink (P9 reference) contained in the text concerned. You will be directed to the act as published on the European Parliament's website. 10606/21 FFF/icf 1 GIP.2 EN www.parlament.gv.at Second reading 3. Streamlining measures for the realisation of the TEN-T Report: Dominique Riquet (A9-0223/2021) European Parliame nt legisla tive resolutio n P9_TA(2021)0318 4. Internal Security Fund Report: Monika Hohlmeier (A9-0221/2021) European Parliame nt legisla tive resolutio n P9_TA(2021)0324 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 Is Awarded Background Briefing in the Next 10 Days, the Nominations of the Sakharov
    1 03 Sept. 2014 How the Sakharov Prize 2014 is awarded Background briefing In the next 10 days, the nominations of the Sakharov Prize for Human Rights will be decided by the European Parliament. The prize is awarded to “honour exceptional individuals who combat intolerance, fanaticism and oppression.”1 Previous winners include Nelson Mandela, Reporters without Borders and Anatoli Marchenko. If you believe that Azerbaijani human rights defenders – who are now in jail following years of work on behalf of the rights of others, and most recently on a list of political prisoners in Azerbaijan (on which they are now included) – then let the MEPs who vote on this know. Nominations for the Sakharov Prize can be made by: Political groups in the European Parliament. Or At least 40 MEPs. The deadline for nominations is Thursday 18 September at 12:00 in Strasbourg. NOTE: In order to decide on a nominee from their group some political groups have internal deadlines in the course of the next week. The next days are crucial. We focus here on four important political groups which might to support this nomination: The EPP Social Democrats Liberals Greens 1Source: The European Union website: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/aboutparliament/en/00f3dd2249/Sakharov-Prize-for-Freedom-of-Thought.html 2 Once the nominations are been made, the Foreign Affairs and Development committees vote on a shortlist of three finalists. This happens on either Monday 6th or Tuesday 7th October 2014. The members list for the foreign affairs committee can be found here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/afet/members.html, while the development committee is here: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/deve/members.html#menuzone.
    [Show full text]
  • European Elections 2019
    European Elections 2019 Date: May 20th 2019 European Elections 2019 In the Report “European Elections 2019”, Political Intelligence Lisboa assembles and analyses key political data on the next European Elections and Portuguese Electoral Landscape Table of Contents 1. European Elections Setting 2. European Political Families 3. Portuguese Electoral Landscape 4. Portuguese Political Parties Manifestos 5. European Elections Hot Topics T: (+351) 211 921 396 Av. Eng Duarte Pacheco, nº19, 4º dto 1070-100 Lisboa European Elections 2019 1. EUROPEAN ELECTIONS SETTING The last term of the European Parliament (2014-2019) was marked by several decisive moments, with repercussions on the next political cycle, namely on digital, environmental sustainability and budgetary policy subjects. Digital Approval of the EU Copyright Directive in Proposal for the creation of a tax on digital the Single Digital Market to standardise services traded in Europe. Its rejection by European legislation applicable on several Member-States led to an appeal authors’ rights in today’s digital era for the alteration of the voting systems in EU tax policy The viability of its transposition for the Portuguese jurisdiction will be in Changing the voting system from discussion at the next Parliament term unanimity to a qualified majority voting would lead to an increase in European competences concerning tax policy. The scope of its activities will be the target of future debate on the next European political cycle T: (+351) 211 921 396 Av. Eng Duarte Pacheco, nº19, 4º dto
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results
    Briefing June 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Results Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 7 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 3 seats 2 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Heinz Christian Strache 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide 6. Alexander Bernhuber 7. Barbara Thaler NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 1. Maria Arena* Socialist Party (PS) Christian Social Party 3. Johan Van Overtveldt 2. Marc Tarabella* (S&D) 2 seats (CSP) (EPP) 1 seat New Flemish Alliance (N-VA) 1. Olivier Chastel (Greens/EFA) Reformist 2. Frédérique Ries* 4 seats Movement (MR) (ALDE) 2 seats 1. Philippe Lamberts* 2. Saskia Bricmont 1. Guy Verhofstadt* Ecolo (Greens/EFA) 2. Hilde Vautmans* 2 seats Open Flemish Liberals and Democrats (Open 1. Benoît Lutgen Humanist VLD) (ALDE) 2 seats democratic centre (cdH) (EPP) 1 seat 1. Kris Peeters Workers’ Party of 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the European Parliament (Meps)
    Making Connections to Influence Some tools for TU in EU Advocacy PART I What Advocacy means? PART II Advocacy & European Institutions PART III The MEPs of ECON and EMPL PART I: What Advocacy means? Advocacy • Advocacy is a political process by an individual or group which aims to influence public- policy and resource allocation decisions within political, economic, and social systems and institutions. 1.Identify the issue YOU MUST HAVE A IF IT IS TOO NARROW, IT GOOD UNDERSTANDING IF YOUR FOCUS AREA IS MAY BE DIFFICULT TO OF THE CHALLENGE TOO WIDE, IT WILL BE COMMUNICATE TO YOU WANT TO ADDRESS DIFFICULT FOR YOU TO POLICY-MAKERS, WHO AND A CLEAR IDEA OF BRING ABOUT MIGHT PERCEIVE IT AS HOW IT COULD BE CONCRETE CHANGES; TOO TECHNICAL. SOLVED. 2. Set the objective 3. Identify the target Identify policy and decision-makers who » which ones have the have the power to greatest influence? introduce the policy changes you propose. Consider the partnership; advocate towards allies » who do you have to get them to propose existing contacts with? or support actions on your issues 4.Develop an action plan define what success would look like to you what would be the in the short, medium, intermediary steps to Timing is crucial for and long terms. have this happen? achieving results. What form would the In the short term, how You should ensure that action or policy change can you ensure that the you are aware of the take and how would it issue is placed on the timetable of policy be implemented in the agenda? discussions and long run? prepare in advance to provide input towards them, in order to be able to influence the outcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Protokół Posiedzenia W Dniu 11 Lutego 2020 R. (2021/C 261/02)
    2.7.2021 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej C 261/53 Wtorek, 11 lutego 2020 r. PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 11 LUTEGO 2020 R. (2021/C 261/02) Spis treści Strona 1. Otwarcie posiedzenia . 54 2. Propozycja mandatu dotyczącego negocjacji w sprawie nowego partnerstwa ze Zjednoczonym Królestwem 54 Wielkiej Brytanii i Irlandii Północnej (debata) . 3. Skład komisji i delegacji . 55 4. Zawarcie Umowy o wolnym handlu między UE a Wietnamem *** — Zawarcie Umowy o wolnym handlu między UE a Wietnamem (rezolucja) — Umowa o ochronie inwestycji między UE a Wietnamem *** — 55 Umowa o ochronie inwestycji między UE a Wietnamem (rezolucja) (debata) . 5. Wznowienie posiedzenia . 56 6. Komunikat Przewodniczącego . 56 7. Zatwierdzenie protokołu poprzedniego posiedzenia . 56 8. Europejski Bank Centralny — raport roczny 2018 (debata) . 56 9. Naruszenie decyzji Rady 2017/2074 w sprawie środków ograniczających w związku z sytuacją w Wenezueli 57 — nielegalny wjazd osoby objętej sankcjami na terytorium państwa członkowskiego UE (debata) . 10. Plan USA dla Bliskiego Wschodu: reakcja UE zgodnie z prawem międzynarodowym (debata) . 58 11. Obecna sytuacja w zakresie bezpieczeństwa w Syrii (debata) . 58 12. Nowa kompleksowa strategia UE-Afryka (debata) . 59 13. Walka z antysemityzmem, rasizmem i nienawiścią w Europie (debata) . 59 14. Skład komisji i delegacji . 60 15. Obecne zagrożenie praworządności w Polsce (debata) . 60 16. Skład Parlamentu . 61 17. Nielegalny handel zwierzętami domowymi w UE (debata) . 61 18. Zatwierdzenie protokołu niniejszego posiedzenia . 61 19. Porządek obrad następnego posiedzenia . 62 20. Zamknięcie posiedzenia . 62 LISTA OBECNOŚCI . 63 C 261/54 PL Dziennik Urzędo wy U nii Europejskiej 2.7.2021 Wtorek, 11 lutego 2020 r. PROTOKÓŁ POSIEDZENIA W DNIU 11 LUTEGO 2020 R.
    [Show full text]
  • Maternity Leave Letter to Council 10.03.20.Pdf
    Samira Rafaela c.s., Members of European Parliament Parlamentum Europaeum to: his excellency Charles Michel, President of the Council of the European Union Brussels, 10 March 2020 Re: Democratic deficit in the European Parliament and the necessary revision of the European Electoral Act Y our Excellency, The European Union is a beacon for democracy, freedom and the rule of law. These values have made Europe objectively one of the best places for its citizens to live and to thrive. Membership of the EU has served to inspire Member States to foster these values to the fullest. In the process, the European community has evolved into a political entity with democratic institutions to safeguard and promote the values we cherish, namely through our directly elected European Parliament, which in tum elects the European Commission. Furthermore, democratically elected governments back the members of your Council. There still are however, flaws in the democratic fabric of our ever-evolving Union. Today we urge you and your Council to address one of these flaws. A European Union that values equality between the citizens that make up our society should have institutions that reflects those values. Currently the Act concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage is limiting citizens' representation in the European Parliament, where their Members exercise their right to maternity, paternity or parental leave during the latter stages of pregnancy or following the birth of a child. Not only are such limitations creating a democratic deficit for some European citizens but they further undermine the core European tenet of gender equality, with the majority of Members affected being pregnant and post-natal women.
    [Show full text]