Articles on 2005 in Spaceflight, Including: Cosmos 1, Shenzhou 6, Mars Reconnaissance

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

U8IVGNVDZL3R » Doc » Articles On 2005 In Spaceflight, including: Cosmos 1, Shenzhou 6, Mars Reconnaissance... Read Doc ARTICLES ON 2005 IN SPACEFLIGHT, INCLUDING: COSMOS 1, SHENZHOU 6, MARS RECONNAISSANCE ORBITER, STS-114, DEEP IMPACT (SPACE MISSION), VENUS EXPRESS, TITAN IV, DART (SPACECRAFT), SOYUZ TMA- 6, APSTAR VI, Download PDF Articles On 2005 In Spaceflight, including: Cosmos 1, Shenzhou 6, Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, Sts-114, Deep Impact (space Mission), Venus Express, Titan Iv, Dart (spacecraft), Soyuz Tma-6, Apstar Vi, Authored by Books, Hephaestus Released at 2016 Filesize: 7.28 MB To open the data file, you need Adobe Reader software. If you do not have Adobe Reader already installed on your computer, you can download the installer and instructions free from the Adobe Web site. You can download and preserve it in your computer for later on go through. Be sure to click this button above to download the PDF file. Reviews It in a single of my favorite ebook. It can be packed with knowledge and wisdom I am just happy to tell you that this is basically the finest ebook i have got study in my very own lifestyle and may be he greatest pdf for actually. -- Dr. Jaquan Goodwin Jr. This written book is great. I am quite late in start reading this one, but better then never. You will not really feel monotony at at any moment of your time (that's what catalogues are for about when you check with me). -- Abe Reichel DDS The very best pdf i possibly study. It generally will not expense excessive. You wont really feel monotony at anytime of the time (that's what catalogs are for concerning should you ask me). -- Prof. Owen Sporer TERMS | DMCA.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Human Behavior During Spaceflight - Videncee from an Analog Environment
Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research Volume 25 Number 1 JAAER Fall 2015 Article 2 Fall 2015 Human Behavior During Spaceflight - videnceE From an Analog Environment Kenny M. Arnaldi Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, [email protected] Guy Smith Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, [email protected] Jennifer E. Thropp Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/jaaer Part of the Applied Behavior Analysis Commons, Experimental Analysis of Behavior Commons, and the Other Astrophysics and Astronomy Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Arnaldi, K. M., Smith, G., & Thropp, J. E. (2015). Human Behavior During Spaceflight - videnceE From an Analog Environment. Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research, 25(1). https://doi.org/ 10.15394/jaaer.2015.1676 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Aviation/Aerospace Education & Research by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Arnaldi et al.: Human Behavior During Spaceflight - Evidence From an Analog Environment Introduction Four years after the launch of Sputnik, the world’s first artificial satellite, Yuri Gagarin became the first human to reach space (National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA], 2011a). The United States soon followed on the path of manned space exploration with Project Mercury. Although this program began with suborbital flights, manned spacecraft were subsequently launched into orbit around the Earth (NASA, 2012). With President Kennedy setting the goal of landing a man on the moon, NASA focused on short-duration orbital flights as a stepping-stone to lunar missions.
[Show full text]
Astronomy 2008 Index
Astronomy Magazine Article Title Index 10 rising stars of astronomy, 8:60–8:63 1.5 million galaxies revealed, 3:41–3:43 185 million years before the dinosaurs’ demise, did an asteroid nearly end life on Earth?, 4:34–4:39 A Aligned aurorae, 8:27 All about the Veil Nebula, 6:56–6:61 Amateur astronomy’s greatest generation, 8:68–8:71 Amateurs see fireballs from U.S. satellite kill, 7:24 Another Earth, 6:13 Another super-Earth discovered, 9:21 Antares gang, The, 7:18 Antimatter traced, 5:23 Are big-planet systems uncommon?, 10:23 Are super-sized Earths the new frontier?, 11:26–11:31 Are these space rocks from Mercury?, 11:32–11:37 Are we done yet?, 4:14 Are we looking for life in the right places?, 7:28–7:33 Ask the aliens, 3:12 Asteroid sleuths find the dino killer, 1:20 Astro-humiliation, 10:14 Astroimaging over ancient Greece, 12:64–12:69 Astronaut rescue rocket revs up, 11:22 Astronomers spy a giant particle accelerator in the sky, 5:21 Astronomers unearth a star’s death secrets, 10:18 Astronomers witness alien star flip-out, 6:27 Astronomy magazine’s first 35 years, 8:supplement Astronomy’s guide to Go-to telescopes, 10:supplement Auroral storm trigger confirmed, 11:18 B Backstage at Astronomy, 8:76–8:82 Basking in the Sun, 5:16 Biggest planet’s 5 deepest mysteries, The, 1:38–1:43 Binary pulsar test affirms relativity, 10:21 Binocular Telescope snaps first image, 6:21 Black hole sets a record, 2:20 Black holes wind up galaxy arms, 9:19 Brightest starburst galaxy discovered, 12:23 C Calling all space probes, 10:64–10:65 Calling on Cassiopeia, 11:76 Canada to launch new asteroid hunter, 11:19 Canada’s handy robot, 1:24 Cannibal next door, The, 3:38 Capture images of our local star, 4:66–4:67 Cassini confirms Titan lakes, 12:27 Cassini scopes Saturn’s two-toned moon, 1:25 Cassini “tastes” Enceladus’ plumes, 7:26 Cepheus’ fall delights, 10:85 Choose the dome that’s right for you, 5:70–5:71 Clearing the air about seeing vs.
[Show full text]
Commercial Orbital Transportation Services
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight NASA/SP-2014-617 Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight On the cover: Background photo: The terminator—the line separating the sunlit side of Earth from the side in darkness—marks the changeover between day and night on the ground. By establishing government-industry partnerships, the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program marked a change from the traditional way NASA had worked. Inset photos, right: The COTS program supported two U.S. companies in their efforts to design and build transportation systems to carry cargo to low-Earth orbit. (Top photo—Credit: SpaceX) SpaceX launched its Falcon 9 rocket on May 22, 2012, from Cape Canaveral, Florida. (Second photo) Three days later, the company successfully completed the mission that sent its Dragon spacecraft to the Station. (Third photo—Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls) Orbital Sciences Corp. sent its Antares rocket on its test flight on April 21, 2013, from a new launchpad on Virginia’s eastern shore. Later that year, the second Antares lifted off with Orbital’s cargo capsule, (Fourth photo) the Cygnus, that berthed with the ISS on September 29, 2013. Both companies successfully proved the capability to deliver cargo to the International Space Station by U.S. commercial companies and began a new era of spaceflight. ISS photo, center left: Benefiting from the success of the partnerships is the International Space Station, pictured as seen by the last Space Shuttle crew that visited the orbiting laboratory (July 19, 2011). More photos of the ISS are featured on the first pages of each chapter.
[Show full text]
Please Type Your Paper Title Here In
Estimating the Reliability of a Soyuz Spacecraft Mission Michael G. Lutomskia*, Steven J. Farnham IIb, and Warren C. Grantb aNASA-JSC, Houston, TX – [email protected] bARES Corporation, Houston, TX Abstract: Once the US Space Shuttle retires in 2010, the Russian Soyuz Launcher and Soyuz Spacecraft will comprise the only means for crew transportation to and from the International Space Station (ISS). The U.S. Government and NASA have contracted for crew transportation services to the ISS with Russia. The resulting implications for the US space program including issues such as astronaut safety must be carefully considered. Are the astronauts and cosmonauts safer on the Soyuz than the Space Shuttle system? Is the Soyuz launch system more robust than the Space Shuttle? Is it safer to continue to fly the 30 year old Shuttle fleet for crew transportation and cargo resupply than the Soyuz? Should we extend the life of the Shuttle Program? How does the development of the Orion/Ares crew transportation system affect these decisions? The Soyuz launcher has been in operation for over 40 years. There have been only two loss of life incidents and two loss of mission incidents. Given that the most recent incident took place in 1983, how do we determine current reliability of the system? Do failures of unmanned Soyuz rockets impact the reliability of the currently operational man-rated launcher? Does the Soyuz exhibit characteristics that demonstrate reliability growth and how would that be reflected in future estimates of success? NASA’s next manned rocket and spacecraft development project is currently underway.
[Show full text]
Evolved Expendable Launch Operations at Cape Canaveral, 2002-2009
EVOLVED EXPENDABLE LAUNCH OPERATIONS AT CAPE CANAVERAL 2002 – 2009 by Mark C. Cleary 45th SPACE WING History Office PREFACE This study addresses ATLAS V and DELTA IV Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) operations at Cape Canaveral, Florida. It features all the EELV missions launched from the Cape through the end of Calendar Year (CY) 2009. In addition, the first chapter provides an overview of the EELV effort in the 1990s, summaries of EELV contracts and requests for facilities at Cape Canaveral, deactivation and/or reconstruction of launch complexes 37 and 41 to support EELV operations, typical EELV flight profiles, and military supervision of EELV space operations. The lion’s share of this work highlights EELV launch campaigns and the outcome of each flight through the end of 2009. To avoid confusion, ATLAS V missions are presented in Chapter II, and DELTA IV missions appear in Chapter III. Furthermore, missions are placed in three categories within each chapter: 1) commercial, 2) civilian agency, and 3) military space operations. All EELV customers employ commercial launch contractors to put their respective payloads into orbit. Consequently, the type of agency sponsoring a payload (the Air Force, NASA, NOAA or a commercial satellite company) determines where its mission summary is placed. Range officials mark all launch times in Greenwich Mean Time, as indicated by a “Z” at various points in the narrative. Unfortunately, the convention creates a one-day discrepancy between the local date reported by the media and the “Z” time’s date whenever the launch occurs late at night, but before midnight. (This proved true for seven of the military ATLAS V and DELTA IV missions presented here.) In any event, competent authorities have reviewed all the material presented in this study, and it is releasable to the general public.
[Show full text]
Preparation of Papers for AIAA Journals
An Overview of Solar Sail Propulsion within NASA Les Johnson1 NASA George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812, USA Grover A. Swartzlander2 Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623 and Alexandra Artusio-Glimpse 3 Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623 Solar Sail Propulsion (SSP) is a high-priority new technology within The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and several potential future space missions have been identified that will require SSP. Small and mid-sized technology demonstration missions using solar sails have flown or will soon fly in space. Multiple mission concept studies have been performed to determine the system level SSP requirements for their implementation and, subsequently, to drive the content of relevant technology programs. The status of SSP technology and potential future mission implementation within the United States (US) will be described. Nomenclature V delta-v (change in velocity) AU = astronomical unit g = gravitational (measurement of acceleration felt as weight; a force per unit mass) GeV = giga-electron-volts kg = kilogram L1 = Lagrange point 1 m2 = meters squared I. Introduction Solar Sail Propulsion (SSP) was identified as a high-priority new technology by the Space Studies Board of the National Research Council in their 2012 Heliophysics Decadal Survey [1], and several potential future space 1 Deputy Manager, Advanced Concepts Office, Mail Code ED04, NASA MSFC, Huntsville, AL 35812 2 Associate Professor, Department of Physics, 54 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623 3 Graduate Student, Department of Physics, 54 Lomb Memorial Drive, Rochester, NY 14623 missions have been proposed that will require SSP to be achieved.
[Show full text]
Seeking a Human Spaceflight Program Worthy of a Great Nation
SEEKING A HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT PROGRAM WORTHY OF A GREAT NATION Review of U.S. HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT Plans Committee Review of U.S. Human Spaceflight Plans Committee 1 SEEKING A HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT PROGRAM WORTHY OF A GREAT NATION 2 Review of U.S. Human Spaceflight Plans Committee SEEKING A HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT PROGRAM WORTHY OF A GREAT NATION “We choose...to do [these] things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard...” John F. Kennedy September 12, 1962 Review of U.S. Human Spaceflight Plans Committee 3 SEEKING A HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT PROGRAM WORTHY OF A GREAT NATION Table of Contents Preface .......................... ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Executive Summary ..... ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 19 Chapter 2.0 U.S. Human Spaceflight: Historical Review ............................................................................ 27 Chapter 3.0 Goals and Future Destinations for Exploration ........................................................................ 33 3.1 Goals for Exploration ............................................................................................................... 33 3.2 Overview of Destinations and Approach .................................................................................
[Show full text]
The Columbia Tragedy, the Discovery Mission, and the Future of the Shuttle
Order Code RS21408 Updated October 13, 2005 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web NASA’s Space Shuttle Program: The Columbia Tragedy, the Discovery Mission, and the Future of the Shuttle Marcia S. Smith Resources, Science, and Industry Division Summary On August 9, 2005, the space shuttle Discovery successfully completed the first of two “Return to Flight” (RTF) missions — STS-114. It was the first shuttle launch since the February 1, 2003, Columbia tragedy. NASA announced on July 27, 2005, the day after STS-114’s launch, that a second RTF mission has been indefinitely postponed because of a problem that occurred during Discovery’s launch that is similar to what led to the loss of Columbia. Two shuttle-related facilities in Mississippi and Louisiana were damaged by Hurricane Katrina, which may further delay the next shuttle launch. It currently is expected some time in 2006. This report discusses the Columbia tragedy, the Discovery mission, and issues for Congress regarding the future of the shuttle. For more information, see CRS Issue Brief IB93062, Space Launce Vehicles: Government Activities, Commercial Competition, and Satellite Exports, by Marcia Smith. This report is updated regularly. The Loss of the Space Shuttle Columbia The space shuttle Columbia was launched on its STS-107 mission on January 16, 2003. After completing a 16-day scientific research mission, Columbia started its descent to Earth on the morning of February 1, 2003. As it descended from orbit, approximately 16 minutes before its scheduled landing at Kennedy Space Center, FL, Columbia broke apart over northeastern Texas. All seven astronauts aboard were killed: Commander Rick Husband; Pilot William McCool; Mission Specialists Michael P.
[Show full text]
<> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA
1 SATELITES ARTIFICIALES. Capítulo 5º Subcap. 10 <> CRONOLOGIA DE LOS SATÉLITES ARTIFICIALES DE LA TIERRA. Esta es una relación cronológica de todos los lanzamientos de satélites artificiales de nuestro planeta, con independencia de su éxito o fracaso, tanto en el disparo como en órbita. Significa pues que muchos de ellos no han alcanzado el espacio y fueron destruidos. Se señala en primer lugar (a la izquierda) su nombre, seguido de la fecha del lanzamiento, el país al que pertenece el satélite (que puede ser otro distinto al que lo lanza) y el tipo de satélite; este último aspecto podría no corresponderse en exactitud dado que algunos son de finalidad múltiple. En los lanzamientos múltiples, cada satélite figura separado (salvo en los casos de fracaso, en que no llegan a separarse) pero naturalmente en la misma fecha y juntos. NO ESTÁN incluidos los llevados en vuelos tripulados, si bien se citan en el programa de satélites correspondiente y en el capítulo de “Cronología general de lanzamientos”. .SATÉLITE Fecha País Tipo SPUTNIK F1 15.05.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK F2 21.08.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 01 04.10.1957 URSS Experimental o tecnológico SPUTNIK 02 03.11.1957 URSS Científico VANGUARD-1A 06.12.1957 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 01 31.01.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1B 05.02.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 02 05.03.1958 USA Científico VANGUARD-1 17.03.1958 USA Experimental o tecnológico EXPLORER 03 26.03.1958 USA Científico SPUTNIK D1 27.04.1958 URSS Geodésico VANGUARD-2A
[Show full text]
Lightsail Program Status: One Down, One to Go
SSC15-V-3 LightSail Program Status: One Down, One to Go Rex Ridenoure, Riki Munakata, Alex Diaz, Stephanie Wong Ecliptic Enterprises Corporation Pasadena, CA; (626) 278-0435 [email protected] Barbara Plante Boreal Space Hayward, CA; (510) 915-4717 [email protected] Doug Stetson Space Science and Exploration Consulting Group Pasadena, CA, (818) 854-8921 [email protected] Dave Spencer Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, GA, (770) 331-2340 [email protected] Justin Foley California Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo San Luis Obispo, CA, (805) 756-5074 [email protected] ABSTRACT The LightSail program involves two 3U CubeSats designed to advance solar sailing technology state of the art. The entire program is privately funded by members and supporters of The Planetary Society, the world’s largest non- profit space advocacy organization. Spacecraft design started in 2009; by the end of 2011 both spacecraft had largely been built but not fully tested, and neither had a firm launch commitment. Following an 18-month program pause during 2012-2013, the effort was resumed after launch opportunities had been secured for each spacecraft. The first LightSail spacecraft—dedicated primarily to demonstrating the solar sail deployment process—was launched into Earth orbit on 2015 May 20 as a secondary payload aboard an Atlas 5 rocket, and on June 9 mission success was declared. The mission plan for the second LightSail includes demonstration of solar sailing in Earth orbit, among other objectives. It is on track for a launch in 2016 aboard a Falcon Heavy rocket as a key element of the Prox-1 mission.
[Show full text]
Alternatives for Future U.S. Space-Launch Capabilities Pub
CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE A CBO STUDY OCTOBER 2006 Alternatives for Future U.S. Space-Launch Capabilities Pub. No. 2568 A CBO STUDY Alternatives for Future U.S. Space-Launch Capabilities October 2006 The Congress of the United States O Congressional Budget Office Note Unless otherwise indicated, all years referred to in this study are federal fiscal years, and all dollar amounts are expressed in 2006 dollars of budget authority. Preface Currently available launch vehicles have the capacity to lift payloads into low earth orbit that weigh up to about 25 metric tons, which is the requirement for almost all of the commercial and governmental payloads expected to be launched into orbit over the next 10 to 15 years. However, the launch vehicles needed to support the return of humans to the moon, which has been called for under the Bush Administration’s Vision for Space Exploration, may be required to lift payloads into orbit that weigh in excess of 100 metric tons and, as a result, may constitute a unique demand for launch services. What alternatives might be pursued to develop and procure the type of launch vehicles neces- sary for conducting manned lunar missions, and how much would those alternatives cost? This Congressional Budget Office (CBO) study—prepared at the request of the Ranking Member of the House Budget Committee—examines those questions. The analysis presents six alternative programs for developing launchers and estimates their costs under the assump- tion that manned lunar missions will commence in either 2018 or 2020. In keeping with CBO’s mandate to provide impartial analysis, the study makes no recommendations.
[Show full text]
→ Programmes in Progress Status at End December 2008
→ pROGRAMMes IN PROGRess status at end December 2008 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 COMMENTS HUBBLE LAUNCHED APRIL 1990 ULYSSES LAUNCHED OCTOBER 1990 SOHO LAUNCHED DEC 1995 / OPS EXTENDED UNTIL 31 DEC 2009 XMM-NEWTON LAUNCHED DEC 1999 / OPS EXTENDED UNTIL 31 DEC 2012 CLUSTER LAUNCHED MID-2000 INTEGRAL LAUNCHED OCTOBER 2002 MARS EXPRESS LAUNCHED JUNE 2003 SMART-1 LAUNCHED SEPTEMBER 2003, IMPACTED MOON 2006 ORATION DOUBLE STAR TC-1 LAUNCHED DEC 2003 / TC-2 LAUNCHED JULY 2004 ROSETTA LAUNCHED MARCH 2004 TIC EXPL VENUS EXPRESS LAUNCHED NOVEMBER 2005 HERSCHEL/PLANCK LAUNCH 16 APRIL 2009 PROGRAMME LISA PATHFINDER LAUNCH EARLY 2011 MICROSCOPE LAUNCH EARLY 2011 GAIA LAUNCH DECEMBER 2011 SCIENCE & ROBO JWST LAUNCH JUNE 2013 EXOMARS LAUNCH 2016 BEPICOLOMBO LAUNCH AUGUST 2014 SOLAR ORBITER LAUNCH JANUARY 2017 LISA LAUNCH END 2017 METEOSAT-5/6/7 M5 LAUNCHED 1991, M6 1993, M7 1997 ERS-2 LAUNCHED APRIL 1995 / OPS EXTENDED TO MID-2011 ENVISAT LAUNCHED MARCH 2002 / POSSIBLE EXTENSION BEYOND 2010 MSG MSG-3 LAUNCH 2011, MSG-4 LAUNCH 2013 MTG LAUNCH MTG-I-1 END 2015 / MTG-S-1 2017 METOP METOP-A LAUNCH OCT 2006 / METOP-B 2011 / METOP-C 2013 CRYOSAT LAUNCH FAILURE OCT 2005 / CRYOSAT-2 LAUNCH NOV 2009 GOCE LAUNCH 16 MARCH 2009 SMOS LAUNCH JULY 2009 PROGRAMME TH OBSERVATION ADM-AEOLUS LAUNCH APRIL 2011 EAR SWARM LAUNCH 2010 EARTHCARE LAUNCH MID-2013 SENTINEL-1 LAUNCH NOVEMBER 2011 SENTINEL-2 LAUNCH OCTOBER 2012 SENTINEL-3 LAUNCH NOVEMBER 2012 ARTEMIS LAUNCHED JULY 2001, OPERATIONS EXTENDED ALPHABUS ALPHASAT LAUNCH JUNE 2012 SMALL GEO SAT. LAUNCH MID 2012 GNSS-1/EGNOS OPERATIONS START 2008 PROGRAMMES TELECOMMS/NAV.
[Show full text]