DOCSLIB.ORG

Friedrich Leibniz U. Leipzig 1622 Jakob Thomasius U. Leipzig 1643

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Friedrich Leibniz U. Leipzig 1622 Jakob Thomasius U. Leipzig 1643 3regor( "a amas ;oger 3. 9hi!e ;ichard "earson< Jr 7i os &abasi as Johannes von Hi desheim 1363 1363 Heinrich von Langens!ein +eme!rios &(dones 2 issaeus Judaeus U. "aris 1375 13#$ 3eorgios " e!hon 3emis!os 1393 13)3 Johannes von 3munden %anue Chr(so oras U. 9ien 1406 14.6 3uarino da *erona 1408 14.5 *i!!orino da Fe !re U. "adova 1416 1416 Theodoros Gazes U. %an!ova 1433 1433 ,asi ios ,essarion %(s!ras 1436 1436 3eorg von "euerbach U. 9ien 1440 144. Johannes 'rg(ropou os 3ae!ano de Thiene 1igismondo "o cas!ro U. "adova 1444 1444 +eme!rios Cha cocond( es "ie!ro ;occabone a "e ope %(s!ras U. "adova 1452 14$2 7icco o Leoniceno 7ico e!!o *ernia U. "adova U. "adova 1453 14$3 Johannes %u er ;egiomon!anus U. 9ien 1457 14$# %arsi io Ficino "ao o da "ozzo Toscane i U. F orence U. "adova 1462 1462 Leonardo da *inci 3eer! 3erardus %agnus 3roo!e F orens F oren!ius Rad8(n ;ade8(ns U. F orence 1471 14#1 Janus Lascaris Thomas von &empen a &empis U. "adova 1472 14#2 ' e:ander Hegius Jacob ben Jehie Loans 1!. 'gnes< @8o e 1474 14#4 Johannes 1!o66 er 0ris!o6oro Landino U. -ngo s!ad! 1476 14#6 'nge o "o iziano U. F orence 1477 14## ;udo 6 'grico a 3eorgius Hermon(mus U. Ferrara 1478 14#5 Jac=ues Le6evre d2!ap es U. "aris 1480 145. Johann Reuch in Luca "acio i U. "oi!iers 1481 1451 +omenico da Ferrara U. F orence 1483 1453 Leo /u!ers U. Louvain 1485 145$ %arco %usuro U. F orence 1486 1456 "ie!ro "omponazzi U. "adova 1487 145# Leonhard von +obschu!z 3iovanni ,a!!is!a de a %on!e Jagie onian U. U. "adova 1489 145) Jan 1!andonck U. "aris 1490 14). 3ui aume ,ude U. "aris 1491 14)1 1cipione For!iguerra U. F orence 1493 14)3 7ico aus Copernicus U. "adova 1499 14)) U rich @asius U. Freiburg 1501 1$.1 +esiderius 2rasmus %oses "erez U. Turin 1506 1$.6 3iro amo ' eandro U. "adova 1508 1$.5 ,oni6azius 2rasmi U. 9i!!enberg 1509 1$.) ;u!ger ;escius U. "aris 1513 1$13 "hi ipp %e anch!hon U. Tubingen 1514 1$14 Johannes *o mar %aar!en van +orp Thomas 0ranmer U. 9i!!enberg U. Louvain U. 0ambridge 1515 1$1$ 1$1$ 1$1$ Francois Dubois U. "aris 1516 1$16 'ndrea ' cia!i %a!!haeus 'drianus U. ,o ogna 1518 1$15 Jan van 0ampen Jacobus La!omus U. -ngo s!ad! U. Leuven 1519 1$1) 1$1) 'n!onio %usa ,rasavo a U. Ferrara 1520 1$2. ,a !hasar &aeu66e in Jac=ues Toussain 7ico as 0 enard U. Tubingen U. "aris U. Louvain 1521 1$21 1$21 1$21 Jakob %i ich U. 9ien 1524 1$24 Johannes 1!urmius U. Louvain 1527 1$2# %e chior 9o mar Jean Tagau ! U. "aris 1528 1$25 "e!rus 0ur!ius Jacobus 1( vius U. Louvain U. %on!pe ier 1530 1$3. 1$3. Johannes 0a vin U. ,ourges 1531 1$31 'drien Turnebe Johannes 9in!er von 'ndernach U. France U. "aris 1532 1$32 1$32 3eorg ;he!icus 2rasmus ;einho d U. 9i!!enberg U. 9i!!enberg 1535 1$3$ 1$3$ 3emma Frisius U. Louvain 1536 1$36 'ndreas *esa ius U. "adova 1537 1$3# Theodorus ,eza *i!!ore Trincave i U. /r eans U. "adova 1539 1$3) ,assiano Landi U. "adova 1542 1$42 Johannes Homme U. 9i!!enberg 1543 1$43 1ebas!ian +ie!rich %a!!eo Rea do 0o ombo U. 9i!!enberg U. "adova 1544 1$44 1$44 0aspar "eucer U. 9i!!enberg 1545 1$4$ 3abrie e Fa oppio U. Ferrara 1547 1$4# -mmanue Treme ius U. 0ambridge 1549 1$4) Jakob ,euer in U. Tubingen 1551 1$$1 Jacob 'ndreae *a en!ine 7aibod U. Tubingen U. 2r6ur! 1553 1$$3 1$$3 *a en!in Thau U. Leipzig 1555 1$$$ Theodor @8inger< 1r Hieron(mus Fabricius 'nne du ,ourg U. "adova U. "adova 1559 1$$) 1$$) Lamber! +aneau U. 3eneva 1561 1$61 Joseph Jus!us 1ca iger U. France 1563 1$63 Johann Jacob 3r(naeus U. Tubingen 1564 1$64 Johannes 0ase ius "au 9i!!ich U. "isa U. 9i!!enberg 1566 1$66 1$66 %ori!z *a en!in 1!einme!z U. Leipzig 1567 1$6# Jus!us Lipsius U. Louvain 1569 1$6) *a en!in /!!o U. 9i!!enberg 1570 1$#. ;udo ph 1ne ius U. Heide berg 1572 1$#2 1a omon ' ber!i U. "adova 1574 1$#4 'ndreas 1cha!o U. 9i!!enberg 1578 1$#5 John 0raig U. ,ase 1580 1$5. 0hris!oph %eurer Jacobus 'rminius 7ico o Fon!ana Tar!ag ia U. Leipzig U. Leiden 1582 1$52 1$52 "e!rus ;(66 /s!i io ;icci Francois Du Jon< 1r U. ,ase U. ,rescia 1584 1$54 3a i eo 3a i ei Franciscus 3omarus U. "isa U. Heide berg 1585 1$5$ 1$5$ 'n!onius Th(sius Heinrich %aius U. Heide berg 1589 1$5) 9o 6gang Franz Johannes "o (ander van &erckhoven U. 9i!!enberg U. 3eneva 1590 1$). 1$). 2rnes!us He!!enbach Jan Jessenius U. 9i!!enberg U. "adova 1591 1$)1 1$)1 0orne ius %ar!ini U. He ms!ed! 1592 1$)2 2r(cius "u!eanus U. Louvain 1595 1$)$ Jacobus %ar!ini +uncan Lidde U. He ms!ed! U. He ms!ed! 1596 1$)6 1$)6 +anie 1enner! U. 9i!!enberg 1599 1$)) %e chior Jos!e U. 9i!!enberg 1600 16.. 'driaan van den 1pieghe U. "adova 1603 16.3 "hi ipp %u er U. Leipzig 1604 16.4 3eorg 0a i:! U. He ms!ed! 1607 16.# ,enede!!o 0as!e i 1ebas!ian ,eck 'mbrosius ;hodius U. "adova U. ,ase U. 9i!!enberg 1610 161. 161. 161. %arin %ersenne 3isber!us *oe!ius 3i ber! Jacchaeus U. "aris U. Leiden U. Leiden 1611 1611 1611 1611 2mmanue 1!upanus 2vange is!a Torrice i U. ,ase U. ;oma 1613 1613 Franck "ie!erszoon ,urgersdiAk 3i es "ersonne de ;oberva U. Leiden 1614 1614 "au ;ober Henricus ;enerius U. 9i!!enberg U. Leiden 1617 161# 161# Friedrich Leibniz 'do ph *ors!ius U. Leipzig U. "adova 1622 1622 1622 9erner ;o 6inck U. "adova 1625 162$ 3eorg 3rosshain U. 9i!!enberg 1629 162) Theodor @8inger< Jr 0hris!oph 7o!nage 'rno d 1enguerdius U. ,ase U. 9i!!enberg U. Leiden 1630 163. 163. 163. 'braham & ein U. ;os!ock 1632 1632 Johannes %usaeus U. 2r6ur! 1634 1634 %ar!inus 1choock U. U!rech! 1636 1636 Franciscus de e ,oe 1( vius U. ,ase 1637 163# Johann 3eorg %acasius +anie ,erckringer ,a !hasar 9idmarc!er U. Jena U. 3roningen U. Jena 1640 164. 164. 164. *incenzo *iviani U. "isa 1642 1642 Jakob Thomasius U. Leipzig 1643 1643 Johannes de ,ru(n Johann 'ndreas Quens!ed! U. U!rech! U. 9i!!enberg 1644 1644 1644 "e!er 9eren6e s Johann Caspar ,auhin U. ,ase U. ,ase 1649 164) 164) 3eorg ,a !hasar %e!zger 2rhard 9eige U. ,ase U. Leipzig 1650 16$. 16$. -saac ,arro8 'ndreas &unad U. 0ambridge 1652 16$2 'egidius 1!rauch U. 9i!!enberg 1657 16$# 'rno d 3eu inc: U. Leiden 1658 16$5 7iko aus 2g inger U. ,ase 1661 1661 2 ias ;udo ph 0amerarius< 1r 'ugus!in Heinrich Fasch U. Tubingen U. Jena 1663 1663 1663 ,urchard de *o der U. Leiden 1664 1664 /!!o %encke U. Leipzig 1665 166$ 3o!!6ried 9i he m Leibniz U. Leipzig 1666 1666 9o 6erd 1enguerdius 3eorg 9o 66gang 9ede ,enAamin "u e(n U. Leiden U. Leiden 1667 166# 166# -saac 7e8!on U. 0ambridge 1668 1665 ;udo 6 9i he m &rause U. Leiden 1671 16#1 7ico as %a ebranche 1672 16#2 2hren6ried 9a !er von Tschirnhaus U. Leiden 1674 16#4 2dmond Ha e( U. /:6ord 1678 16#5 Johann 3o!!6ried von ,erger U. Jena 1682 1652 Johann "asch U. 9i!!enberg 1683 1653 Jacob ,ernou i 3eorg 2rns! 1!ah U. ,ase U. Jena 1684 1654 1654 Johann Chris!oph 9ichmannschausen U. Leipzig 1685 165$ ;udo 6 Jakob 0amerarius U. Tubingen 1686 1656 "ierre *arignon %ichae 9a !her< Jr Jean4+omin=ue 0assini U. "aris U. 9i!!enberg 1687 165# 165# 2 ias ;udo ph 0amerarius< Jr Jac=ues 0assini U. Tubingen U. "aris 1691 16)1 16)1 Herman ,oerhaave 'dam ,eringer U. Leiden U. 9urzburg 1693 16)3 16)3 Johann ,ernou i Johann 'do ph 9ede U. ,ase U. Jena 1694 16)4 16)4 3eorge Had e( U. /:6ord 1701 1#.1 0hris!ian %. von 9o 66 U. Leipzig 1703 1#.3 1imon "au Hi scher %ichae ' ber!i U. Jena U. 9i!!enberg 1704 1#.4 1#.4 ;oger 0o!es U. 0ambridge 1706 1#.6 Johann 'ndreas " aner U. Tubingen 1709 1#.) 'ugus!in Friedrich 9a !her U. 9i!!enberg 1712 1#12 0hris!ian 'ugus! Hausen U. 9i!!enberg 1713 1#13 Joseph 7ico as de LC-s e U. "aris 1714 1#14 ;ober! 1mi!h U. 0ambridge 1715 1#1$ 3eorg 2rhard Hamberger U. Jena 1721 1#21 ,urchard +avid %auchar! U. Tubingen 1722 1#22 9a !er Ta( or U. 0ambridge 1723 1#23 3erard van 18ie!en U.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment   
    In this pioneering and ambitious study T. J. Hochstrasser analyses and explains the development of natural law theories in Germany between Grotius and Kant. Particular attention is paid to Samuel Pufendorf and his followers, who incorporated many of the key theoretical insights of Thomas Hobbes into German political theory, and evolved a natural law theory based on human socia- bility and a self-sufficient concept of human reason. In so doing, they fostered a new methodology in German philosophy, eclecti- cism, which remained a major creative force in intellectual life down to the emergence of Kantian idealism. This intellectual tradition is recovered through a detailed analysis of the so-called ‘histories of morality’, which assessed contemporary innovations in ethics and political philosophy by describing the progress of the discipline since ancient times, and thus constitute the first serious histories of political thought. Equal consideration is also given to rationalist attempts by Leibniz and Wolff to defend traditional scholastic natural law against Hobbes and the followers of Pufen- dorf, and thus the work offers a detailed account of the range and importance of natural law theories within Germany in the era of enlightened absolutism, up to and including the onset of the Kan- tian revolution in moral philosophy. is Lecturer in International History at the London School of Economics and Political Science. XXXXXX NATURAL LAW THEORIES IN THE EARLY ENLIGHTENMENT Edited by Quentin Skinner (General Editor), Lorraine Daston, Dorothy Ross and James Tully The books in this series will discuss the emergence of intellectual traditions and of related new disciplines, The procedures, aims and vocabularies that were generated will be set in the context of the alternatives available within the contemporary frameworks of ideas and institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Leibniz: Logico-Philosophical Puzzles in the Law Law and Philosophy Library
    Leibniz: Logico-Philosophical Puzzles in the Law Law and Philosophy Library VOLUME 105 Series Editors: FRANCISCO J. LAPORTA, Department of Law, Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain FREDERICK SCHAUER, School of Law, University of Virginia, U.S.A. TORBEN SPAAK, Uppsala University, Sweden Former Series Editors: AULIS AARNIO, MICHAEL D. BAYLES{, CONRAD D. JOHNSON{, ALAN MABE, ALEKSANDER PECZENIK{ Editorial Advisory Board: AULIS AARNIO, Secretary General of the Tampere Club, Finland HUMBERTO A´ VILA, Federal University of South Brazil, Brazil ZENON BANKOWSKI, Centre for Law and Society, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom PAOLO COMANDUCCI, University of Genoa, Italy HUGH CORDER, University of Cape Town, South Africa DAVID DYZENHAUS, University of Toronto, Canada ERNESTO GARZO´ N VALDE´ S, Institut fu¨r Politikwissenschaft, Johannes Gutenberg Universitat, Mainz, Germany RICCARDO GUASTINI, University of Genoa, Italy JOHN KLEINIG, Department of Law, Police Science and Criminal Justice Administration, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York, U.S.A. PATRICIA MINDUS, Uppsala University, Sweden YASUTOMO MORIGIWA, Nagoya University, Japan GIOVANNI BATTISTA RATTI, Department of Legal Sciences, University of Genova, Italy and Member of the Chair of Legal Culture at the University of Girona, Spain WOJCIECH SADURSKI, University of Sydney, Faculty of Law, Sydney, Australia HORACIO SPECTOR, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Argentina ROBERT S. SUMMERS, School of Law, Cornell University, U.S.A. MICHEL TROPER, Universite´ de Paris
    [Show full text]
  • History and Philosophy of Logic from Humanism to Kant
    History and philosophy of logic from Humanism to Kant Mirella Capozzi and Gino Roncaglia* 1. Humanist criticisms of Scholastic logic The first impression of a reader who ‘crosses the border’ between medieval and Renaissance logic may be that of leaving an explored and organized field for a relatively unexplored and much less ordered one. This impression is emphasized by the fact that, while in the medieval period we can assume, despite relevant theoretical differences, some consensus about the nature and purpose of logic, such an assumption cannot be made with reference to the post-medieval and Renaissance period: the many ‘logics’ co-existing and challenging each other were often characterized by deeply divergent assumptions, articulations and purposes. As far as logic is concerned, we could almost be tempted to use this ‘explosion of entropy’ as the very marker of the shift between the medieval and the Renaissance period. The development of Humanism, with its criticism of the late medieval logical tradition, is not the only factor contributing to this situation, but surely is a relevant one. Excessive and artificial subtlety, lack of practical utility, barbarous use of Latin: these are the main charges that humanist dialecticians made against Scholastic logic. Such charges do not simply point out formal deficiencies that could be eliminated within a common logical framework, but call for a change of the logical paradigm itself. The effort to address such charges had a deep influence on the evolution of logic, and resulted in a variety of solutions, many of which were based on contaminations between selected but traditional logical theories, on the one hand, and mainly rhetorical or pedagogical doctrines on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Was One of the Most Prolific Thinkers
    Chapter 1: Introduction “Theoria cum praxi [Theory with practice]”—Leibniz’s motto for the Berlin Society of Sciences. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz was one of the most prolific thinkers of all time. “Often in the morning when I am still in bed,” he wrote, “so many thoughts occur to me in a single hour that sometimes it takes me a whole day or more to write them out” (LH 338; quoted from Mates 1986, 34). These thoughts might have included designs for a new wind pump to drain the mines of the Harz mountains or for a calculating machine based on binary arithmetic, sketches for a treatise on geology or etymology, another draft of a logical calculus that was two hundred years ahead of its time, or a new derivation of Newton’s law of gravitation on strictly mechanical principles. Even before getting up, Leibniz would usually have written lengthy letters on such subjects to one or two learned correspondents, and perhaps a proposal to Peter the Great for a scientific academy, or to his employer the Duke of Hanover for a universally accessible state medical system. He might have penned a legal brief in support of the Duke’s electoral claim to certain territories, a deposition aimed at church reunification, or tried to mediate in the dispute among the Jesuits over the interpretation of Chinese religious rites. In short, Leibniz was an indefatigable one-man industry. Yet all this worldly activity seems at odds with the usual understanding of Leibniz as a philosopher. He is well known for his claim that the world is constituted by what he calls monads (or unities), which he characterizes as substances consisting in perceptions (representations of the whole of the rest of the universe) and appetitions (tendencies toward future states), governed by a law specific to each individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, the Humanist Agenda and the Scientific Method
    3237827: M.Sc. Dissertation Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, the humanist agenda and the scientific method Kundan Misra A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Research), University of New South Wales School of Mathematics and Statistics Faculty of Science University of New South Wales Submitted August 2011 Changes completed September 2012 THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname or Family name: Misra First name: Kundan Other name/s: n/a Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: MSc School: Mathematics and Statistics Faculty: Science Title: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, the humanist agenda and the scientific method Abstract 350 words maximum: Modernity began in Leibniz’s lifetime, arguably, and due to the efforts of a group of philosopher-scientists of which Leibniz was one of the most significant active contributors. Leibniz invented machines and developed the calculus. He was a force for peace, and industrial and cultural development through his work as a diplomat and correspondence with leaders across Europe, and in Russia and China. With Leibniz, science became a means for improving human living conditions. For Leibniz, science must begin with the “God’s eye view” and begin with an understanding of how the Creator would have designed the universe. Accordingly, Leibniz advocated the a priori method of scientific discovery, including the use of intellectual constructions or artifices. He defended the usefulness and success of these methods against detractors. While cognizant of Baconian empiricism, Leibniz found that an unbalanced emphasis on experiment left the investigator short of conclusions on efficient causes.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanism and Early Modern Philosophy Edited by Jill Kraye and M.W.F.Stone
    London Studies in the History of Philosophy Series Editors: Jonathan Wolff, Tim Crane, M.W.F.Stone and Tom Pink London Studies in the History of Philosophy is a unique series of tightly focused edited collections. Bringing together the work of many scholars, some volumes will trace the history of the formulation and treatment of a particular problem of philosophy from the Ancient Greeks to the present day, while others will provide an in-depth analysis of a period or tradition of thought. The series is produced in collaboration with the Philosophy Programme of the University of London School of Advanced Study. 1 Humanism and Early Modern Philosophy Edited by Jill Kraye and M.W.F.Stone Forthcoming 2 Proper Ambition of Science Edited by M.W.F.Stone and Jonathan Wolff Humanism and Early Modern Philosophy Edited by Jill Kraye and M.W.F.Stone London and New York First published 2000 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. © 2000 Jill Kraye and M.W.F.Stone All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Humanism and early modern philosophy/[edited by] Jill Kraye and M.W.F.Stone.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.1 the Notion of Self-Preservation in the Philosophy of Aristotle
    THE ANCIENT NOTION OF SELF- PRESERVATION IN THE THEORIES OF HOBBES AND SPINOZA Justin B. Jacobs King’s College University of Cambridge A dissertation submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History July 2010 Table of Contents Declaration of Originality and Word Count .............................................................................. i Dissertation Summary .......................................................................................................... ii-iii Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................. iv-v Textual Conventions & Abbreviations ............................................................................... vi-viii Preface ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Notion of Self-Preservation in the Philosophy of Aristotle ................................... 14 Motion: A Conceptual Link in Aristotle’s Philosophy ............................................................. 17 The Soul as Form and Capacity in De anima .......................................................................... 20 The Senses and Self-Preservation .......................................................................................... 24 Desire and the Good in Eudemian and Nicomachean Ethics ................................................. 34 The Self as ‘Other’ in Aristotelian Ethics ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GOTTFRIED WILHELM LEIBNIZ: the ART of CONTROVERSIES the New Synthese Historical Library Texts and Studies in the History of Philosophy
    GOTTFRIED WILHELM LEIBNIZ: THE ART OF CONTROVERSIES The New Synthese Historical Library Texts and Studies in the History of Philosophy VOLUME 60 Managing Editor: Simo Knuuttila, University of Helsinki Associate Editors: Daniel Elliot Garber, Princeton University Richard Sorabji, University of London Editorial Consultants: Jan A. Aertsen, Thomas-Institut, Universität zu Köln Roger Ariew, University of South Florida E. Jennifer Ashworth, University of Waterloo Michael Ayers, Wadham College, Oxford Gail Fine, Cornell University R. J. Hankinson, University of Texas Jaakko Hintikka, Boston University Paul Hoffman, University of California, Riverside David Konstan, Brown University Richard H. Kraut, Northwestern University, Evanston Alain de Libera, Université de Genève John E. Murdoch, Harvard University David Fate Norton, McGill University Luca Obertello, Università degli Studi di Genova Eleonore Stump, St. Louis University Allen Wood, Stanford University The titles published in this series are listed at the end of this volume. GOTTFRIED WILHELM LEIBNIZ The Art of Controversies Translated and Edited, with an Introductory Essay and Notes by MARCELO DASCAL Tel Aviv University, Israel with QUINTIN RACIONERO AND ADELINO CARDOSO ´ Library of Congress Control Number: 2008920394 ISBN 978-1-4020-8190-3 (PB) ISBN 978-1-4020-5227-9 (HB) ISBN 978-1-4020-5228-6 (e-book) Published by Springer, P.O. Box 17, 3300 AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands. www.springer.com Printed on acid-free paper All Rights Reserved © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketing Fragment 6 X 10.T65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-88055-8 - The Secularisation of the Confessional State: The Political Thought of Christian Thomasius Ian Hunter Excerpt More information Introduction What the historical record strongly suggests is that no one is above the battle, because the battle is all there is.1 In 1701 Christian Thomasius published a German translation of three of his recent Latin works, under the characteristic title, Dreyfache Rettung des Rechts Evangelischer Fürsten in Kirchen-Sachen (Triple Rescue of the Rights of Protestant Princes in Religious Matters). He was by then a celebrated professor in the University of Halle’s law faculty, in the newly amalgamated kingdom of Brandenburg-Prussia, and the three works had originated as disputations in Thomasius’s academic speciality, Staatskirchenrecht or public church law. Each of them argues for the sovereign’s right to exercise power over churches as social associations inside the state. In the course of one of the disputations he defends himself against a section of the Halle student body who, in enthusiastically embracing a recent polemic advo- cating a presbyterian Calvinist church, had taken Thomasius to task for his anti-clericalism: They further say that I should not only teach manners to the poor priests – which amounts to jumping the fence at its lowest point – but that I should be consistent and also tell home truths to the princes. I answer that I have occasionally also attempted this, but have gathered from many circumstances that I am not pre- destined for this work. Besides, they [the princes] have their court preachers who could and should better tell them this, and thus earn their pay.
    [Show full text]
  • Enthusiasm and Enlightenment: the Reform of Faith and the Reform of Philosophy in the Thought of Christian Thomasius
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Enthusiasm and enlightenment: the reform of faith and the reform of philosophy in the thought of Christian Thomasius Citation for published version: Ahnert, T 2005, 'Enthusiasm and enlightenment: the reform of faith and the reform of philosophy in the thought of Christian Thomasius', Modern Intellectual History, vol. 2, pp. 153-177. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244305000387 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1017/S1479244305000387 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Modern Intellectual History Publisher Rights Statement: Modern Intellectual History / Volume 2 / Issue 02 / August 2005, pp 153 ­ 177 DOI: 10.1017/S1479244305000387, Published online: 02 August 2005 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1479244305000387 How to cite this article: THOMAS AHNERT (2005). ENTHUSIASM AND ENLIGHTENMENT: FAITH AND PHILOSOPHY IN THE THOUGHT OF CHRISTIAN THOMASIUS. Modern Intellectual History, 2, pp 153­177 doi:10.1017/S1479244305000387 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02.
    [Show full text]
  • 9780521661935 Index.Pdf
    Cambridge University Press 0521661935 - Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment T. J. Hochstrasser Index More information Index Achenwall,Gottfried, n. , , and eclecticism, –, , , – Alberti,Valentin, , , , , , , , , and Christian Thomasius, ,nn. and –, , , Alonso of Cartagena, – and Jakob Thomasius, – Aquinas,Thomas, and Wolff, Aristotelianism, see also Buddeus; eclecticism; ‘histories of ‘Altdorf’ school, morality’; moral philosophy, and Conring, –, historiography of; Thomasians; and German Protestantism, , –, , , Thomasius,Christian; Wol ff –, –, , Bruni,Leonardo, – and Pufendorf’s opponents, Bruno,Giordano, , , and Christian Wolff, – Buddeus,Johann Franz, , , –, , see also Alberti; Conring; Leibniz; Pufendorf, n. , , , , , Samuel von; Thomasius,Christian; see also Brucker; eclecticism; Thomasians; universities; Wolff Thomasius,Christian; Wol ff Aristotle, , , , , , , , , , Buhle,Johann Gottlieb, , – , , Burlamaqui,Jean-Jacques, Bacon,Francis, , –, , , , – cameralism, Barbeyrac,Jean, , , , , Campanella,Tommaso, , editions of Grotius and Pufendorf, – canon law, , and history of natural law, , , Carbo,Ludovico, and Leibniz, Cartesianism, , , , , , –, , Basedow,Johann Bernhard, n. , n. n. Charlemagne, Bayle,Pierre, , , , n. Cicero, , , –, –, Beckmann,Nicholas, , –, Coccejus,Samuel, Bentham,Jeremy, – Condillac,Etienne Bonnot de, – Biester,Johann, – Conring,Hermann, , , – Bo¨cler,Johann Heinrich, , –, , and Aristotelianism, – Bodin,Jean, and Boineburg correspondence, – Bo¨hme,Jakob, and eclecticism,
    [Show full text]
  • The Fabric of Thought
    The Fabric of Thought: Reason, Language and Experience in German Philosophy from Hamann to Habermas Jonathan Gray A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervised by: Professor Andrew Bowie Royal Holloway, University of London August 2016 For my father, Bill Gray, who gave me words and worlds. Declaration of Authorship I, Jonathan Gray, hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: Jonathan Gray 1st August 2016 i ii Abstract This thesis examines aspects of the relationship between reason, language and experience by means of an engagement with the legacy of the eighteenth century “linguistic turn” in German philosophy. The examination begins with the emergence of the idea of “pure reason”, including efforts to establish a calculus of thought inspired by innovations in mathematics and the natural sciences. These aspirations to formalise and mechanise reason have parallels with the “thin” conception of rationality in analytic philosophy in the twentieth century. Hamann and Herder’s works provide the basis for an alternative “thick” conception of language as a socially and historically situated “fabric of thought” which provides the conditions of possibility for both reason and experience. This conception has advantages over the twentieth century linguistic turn in accounting for how language structures experience and sustains social worlds, because the latter maintains a disproportionate focus on what Charles Taylor describes as language’s “designative” and “information-encoding” capacities. The works of the Early German Romantics and Nietzsche provide resources for a richer and more ambitious vision for the role of philosophy in creatively reshaping this fabric, articulating new ideals, and opening up horizons for new social, cultural and political ways of being.
    [Show full text]