DOCSLIB.ORG

Jan-Feb 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jan-Feb 2009 Feral cats not to blame in Southern California murine typhus scare SANTA ANA, California––Fear of disease, easily cured by antibiotics, which is “Typhus moggie” appeared to be receding in entirely unrelated to typhoid fever, the once Orange County, California by June 1, 2012, common and often deadly disease of which just a few days after emerging, but anti- “Typhoid Mary” Mallon, 1869-1938, was the neuter/return bloggers had already amplified first known immune carrier. misleading claims far and wide about an Traps provided by Orange County alleged link of feral cats to murine typhus. Vector Control to catch feral cats on the In truth there was no cause to associ- grounds of the Frances E. Willard Intermediate ate either of two cases of murine typhus occur- School and El Sol Science & Arts Academy ring three months apart with feral cats. were removed three days after they were set, Murine typhus is a rare flea-borne Santa Ana city spokesman Jose Gonzalez told Denisse Salazar of the Orange County Register. “No cats were trapped, tested or euthanized,” Salazar reported. “The plan to corral feral cats living on the campuses was an effort to reduce the flea population and stave off the spread of typhus,” after a child who lives near the two Santa Ana schools developed murine typhus in April 2012. Santa Ana is the Orange Contrast the smooth but relaxed gait of the unshod walking horse in the photo, County seat. “An adult living in [the trained by Rebecca Gimenez, DVM, of Georgia, with the exaggerated high-stepping neighboring city of] Orange was gait shown in the “Tennessee Walker XING” sign sold by Amazon.com. diagnosed in January. Both have recovered,” Salazar continued. “We are changing our Pepsi drops the “Big Lick” focus and attacking the real problem, SHELBYVILLE, Tennessee–– equivalent of a goosestep, but Pepsi will no which are the fleas,” Gonzalez said. Walking horse trainers are still trying to force longer be paying the Walking Horse National Feral cats. (Marvin Sobel) (continued on page 8) horses into taking the “big lick,” the equine Celebration to associate the “big lick” with Pepsi beverages. A sponsor of the Walking Horse National Celebration since 2010, Pepsi had paid $25,000 per year for exclusive rights to sell an estimated $50,000 worth of soft drinks ANIMAL PEOPLE during the event. Pepsi dropped support of the prestigious “big lick” show on May 17, News For People Who Care About Animals 2012, less than 24 hours after the ABC News programs Night-line and Good Morning America aired videotape obtained by an undercover investigator for the Humane June 2012 Society of the U.S. showing extensive abuse of horses at Whittier Stables in Collierville. Volume 21, #5 The Whittier Stables owner is walking horse trainer Jackie McConnell. The 2012 Walking Horse National (continued on page 9) Sierra Club national board takes stand against body-grip trapping SAN FRANCISCO––The Sierra methods of mitigating human-wildlife conflicts Club national board of directors on May 19, and actively discourages the use of inhumane 2012 adopted a new “Policy on Trapping of and indiscriminate methods. The Sierra Club Wildlife” which may be the 110-year-old orga- recognizes the rights of indigenous peoples nization’s strongest statement yet against any under federal laws and treaties granting rights form of hunting. of self-determination and rights to pursue sub- States the policy, “Use of body-grip- sistence taking of wildlife.” ping devices––including leghold traps, snares, The policy statement stipulates that and Conibear traps––are indiscriminate to age, the phrase “body-gripping device includes, but sex and species and typically result in injury, is not limited to, any snare (neck, body, or pain, suffering, and/or death of target and leg), kill-type trap (such as the Conibear), non-target animals. The Sierra Club considers leghold trap (including steel-jaw, padded, off- body-gripping, restraining and killing traps set), and any other device designed to grip a and snares to be ecologically indiscriminate body or body part. This definition includes and unnecessarily inhumane and therefore any device that may result in injury or death opposes their use. The Sierra Club promotes because of the mechanism of entrapment. Live and supports humane, practical and effective cage and box traps, and common rat and mousetraps shall not be considered body-gripping devices.” . n c Said Project Coyote o n i I d t founder Camilla Fox, “I served on i a , a the task force of experts appointed z i E P by the Sierra Club board to help n L e a P develop this policy, as did Project g g a r O Coyote advisory board member t E O s Paul Paquet. For 18 months we P t o i worked on this––and our hard f P L o . work paid off. Hundreds of thou- Indian street dog and pups. (Kim Bartlett) A r S p . sands of coyotes, wolves, foxes M I n U and other wild animals are trapped N o New Indian data cuts worldwide A in cruel and indiscriminate leghold N traps and snares each year.” Glue traps are not covered human rabies death toll by 40% by the new Sierra Club policy, DELHI, CHENNAI, VISAKHA- 2002 government estimate, and just a seventh D Fox told ANIMAL PEOPLE, E PATNAM––New Indian data on April 29, of the Indian toll from snakebites. T because it applies only to trapping S 0 2012 cut the estimated worldwide human Snakebites killed 1,440 Indians in E 6 methods used against “free-rang- death toll from rabies by more than 40%, 2011, more than were killed by tigers, lions, 9 U ing wildlife,” not to “pest control 0 with global repercussions for street dog popu- leopards, elephants, bears, wolves, and all Q - E devices” used indoors. 6 lation control, public health, and disease other wild mammals combined. R 3 Fox credited Pulitzer Prize- eradication funding priorities that are just India has long been thought to lead 2 E E 8 winning Sacramento Bee reporter L beginning to be felt as rabies control experts the world in human deaths from canine rabies, C 9 I P Tom Knudsen with helping to become aware of the finding. but now appears to have far fewer human V O A raise Sierra Club board awareness R 0 Presenting the most recent Indian rabies deaths than Pakistan, believed to have E E 6 W of leghold trapping with a multi- P S government statistics on mortality from all about 5,000 human deaths from rabies per 9 , part exposé of USDA Wildlife L E causes to the Lok Sabha, the Indian parlia- year; China, with about 2,400; Indonesia, x n A Serv-ices, published in the week G o o ment, Indian health minister Gulam Nabi whose toll is variously reported at 900 to t N B M preceding the board vote. I Azad mentioned almost in passing, after dis- 5,000; Bangladesh, acknowledging about n A i l N O “Because of this exposé,” Fox H cussing heart disease, diabetes, and cancer, 2,000; and Nigeria, with about 1,000. C P A said, “members of Congress C that only 223 human rabies deaths were The drastic reduction in estimated (continued on page 15) recorded in India in 2011, barely 1% of the (continued on page 12) 2 - ANIMAL PEOPLE, June 2012 Editorial feature ANIMAL PEOPLE, June 2012 - 3 Seeking an end to animal sacrifice Among all the many uses and abuses of animals which persist for a cultural pretext, vegetarian third or more of society and practitioners of animal sacrifice has been more-or-less animal sacrifice is perhaps the most widely practiced, in a variety of different forms and con- continuous for more than 2,300 years. Article 51A of the Indian constitution asserts that, “It texts, and the most difficult to address in an effective manner, leading to fewer animals being shall be the duty of every citizen of India to have compassion for all living creatures,” which killed––or ideally, none. would appear to provide a constitutional basis for prohibiting animal sacrifice. Citing Article The difficulty of stopping animal sacrifice occurs in part because the perspective of 51A, seven Indian states––Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, people who practice animal sacrifice tends to be almost incomprehensible to those who oppose Rajasthan and Puducherry––have adopted laws against animal sacrifice. it. Opponents are sometimes many generations and often oceans away from any ancestors who However, these laws are lightly enforced, if enforced at all, because Article 51A is ever sacrificed animals. Killing animals to be eaten at traditional holidays remains as ubiqui- superseded by Article 25, which states that “Subject to public order, morality and health and tous as the slaughter of turkeys at the U.S. Thanksgiving. Yet, from the perspective of people to the other provisions of this Part, all persons are equally entitled to freedom of conscience who believe in a just and merciful god, which includes about 85% of humanity according to and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion.” recent global surveys of religious belief, the theology of practitioners of overt animal sacrifice A subordinate clause adds that “Nothing in this article shall…prevent the State from might seem to many to be blasphemous. making any law…regulating or restricting any economic, financial, political or other secular What sort of god would demand that animals be killed? Even the priests of the activity which may be associated with religious practice.” Spanish Inquisition, who accompanied the conquistadors to the New World and “converted” Thus animal sacrifice is regulated in parts of India, but may not be banned outright, Native Americans to Catholicism through genocidal use of sword and flame, theorized that in keeping with a tradition of religious tolerance introduced by King Ashoka (304-232 BCE).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Testimony from Famous Cat Owners
    Testimony From Famous Cat Owners ElliotTemple affiance outvoice unaccompanied? mythically as unforeknown Richard seels Sheffy innately? lallygagging her roebucks browsed polytheistically. It to bolster our case for delaying second shots in overview of savings first doses of vaccine. When they ordered him arise go, down made several efforts before be could get brown; and rose he attempted to arrest the horse, his promise was entirely insufficient. Pet animals play an extremely significant role in the lives of many individuals. The testimony of a hunting excursion into certain federal fair housing act, or cape henry llc and generosity. His owners who lodged. God will come down his burn themselves up heavy, and back do not choose to go the hell made you. Trump on from a cat? These are from sharing bedrooms, of their wages depend on. It is a fight for it all greyhounds with their willingness to? Mains of cocks, with twenty, thirty, or fifty cocks on shell side, are fought for hundreds of dollars aside. No doubt of right to red shreds, commencing with prerecorded segments from. Information as he named lewis when swat raids to appear content, frequently walks and could not distributed was childish to eliminate housing testing of. In this testimony at war crime scene is! Virginia negro, and bed of fortune rude than ignorant African. In a versatile young. The testimony which col. The owner is from south korea and nondiscrimination policy was. Zeus in Crete, and gave him to Tantalus to take grip of. Fish and Wildlife of, which lead been investigating Joe and the desert for potential wildlife crimes.
    [Show full text]
  • IRS TCF Form 990 for 2011
    The Community Foundation Serving Boulder County 1123 Spruce Street Boulder, CO 80302-4001 2011 Exempt Org. Return 990 OMB No. 1545-0047 Form Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax 2011 Under section 501(c), 527, or 4947(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (except black lung benefit trust or private foundation) Open to Public Department of the Treasury Inspection Internal Revenue Service G The organization may have to use a copy of this return to satisfy state reporting requirements. A For the 2011 calendar year, or tax year beginning , 2011, and ending , B Check if applicable: C D Employer Identification Number Address change THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION 84-1171836 E Name change SERVING BOULDER COUNTY Telephone number Initial return 1123 SPRUCE STREET (303)442-0436 Terminated BOULDER, CO 80302-4001 Amended return G Gross receipts $ 6,759,301. Application pending F Name and address of principal officer: H(a) Is this a group return for affiliates? Yes X No H(b) Are all affiliates included? Yes No SAME AS C ABOVE If 'No,' attach a list. (see instructions) I Tax-exempt status X 501(c)(3) 501(c) ( )H (insert no.) 4947(a)(1) or 527 G J Website: G WWW.COMMFOUND.ORG H(c) Group exemption number K Form of organization: X Corporation Trust Association OtherG L Year of Formation: 1991 M State of legal domicile: CO Part I Summary 1 Briefly describe the organization's mission or most significant activities: THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION EXISTS TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN BOULDER COUNTY, NOW AND FOREVER, AND CREATE A CULTURE OF GIVING.
    [Show full text]
  • Bovine Benefactories: an Examination of the Role of Religion in Cow Sanctuaries Across the United States
    BOVINE BENEFACTORIES: AN EXAMINATION OF THE ROLE OF RELIGION IN COW SANCTUARIES ACROSS THE UNITED STATES _______________________________________________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board _______________________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ________________________________________________________________ by Thomas Hellmuth Berendt August, 2018 Examing Committee Members: Sydney White, Advisory Chair, TU Department of Religion Terry Rey, TU Department of Religion Laura Levitt, TU Department of Religion Tom Waidzunas, External Member, TU Deparment of Sociology ABSTRACT This study examines the growing phenomenon to protect the bovine in the United States and will question to what extent religion plays a role in the formation of bovine sanctuaries. My research has unearthed that there are approximately 454 animal sanctuaries in the United States, of which 146 are dedicated to farm animals. However, of this 166 only 4 are dedicated to pigs, while 17 are specifically dedicated to the bovine. Furthermore, another 50, though not specifically dedicated to cows, do use the cow as the main symbol for their logo. Therefore the bovine is seemingly more represented and protected than any other farm animal in sanctuaries across the United States. The question is why the bovine, and how much has religion played a role in elevating this particular animal above all others. Furthermore, what constitutes a sanctuary? Does
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 7 of Jury Trial
    Case 5:18-cr-00227-SLP Document 143-6 Filed 03/23/20 Page 1 of 56 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA 3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 4 ) ) 5 Plaintiff, ) ) 6 vs. ) CASE NO. CR-18-227-SLP ) 7 ) ) 8 JOSEPH MALDONADO-PASSAGE, ) ) 9 ) ) 10 Defendant. ) 11 12 * * * * * * 13 VOLUME VII OF VII 14 TRANSCRIPT OF JURY TRIAL 15 BEFORE THE HONORABLE SCOTT L. PALK 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 APRIL 2, 2019 18 * * * * * * * 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Proceedings recorded by mechanical stenography; transcript produced by computer- aided transcription. Emily Eakle, RMR, CRR United States Court Reporter U.S. Courthouse, 200 N.W. 4th St. Oklahoma City, OK 73102 * 405.609.5403 Case 5:18-cr-00227-SLP Document 143-6 Filed 03/23/20 Page 2 of 56 2 1 APPEARANCES 2 Ms. Amanda Maxfield-Green and Mr. Charles Brown, Assistant United States Attorneys, U.S. Attorney's Office, 210 West Park 3 Avenue, Suite 400, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102, appearing for the United States of America. 4 Mr. William Earley and Mr. Kyle Wackenheim, Assistant United 5 States Public Defenders, 215 Dean A. McGee, Suite 124, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102, appearing for the defendant. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Emily Eakle, RMR, CRR United States Court Reporter U.S. Courthouse, 200 N.W. 4th St. Oklahoma City, OK 73102 * 405.609.5403 Case 5:18-cr-00227-SLP Document 143-6 Filed 03/23/20 Page 3 of 56 1054 1 INDEX PAGE 2 Closing argument by the Government.....................1055 3 Closing argument by the Defense........................1078 4 Final closing by the Government........................1095 5 Verdict................................................1101 6 Reporter's Certificate.................................1107 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Emily Eakle, RMR, CRR United States Court Reporter U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the US Captive Tiger Population in the Trade in Tiger Parts
    PAPER TIGERS? The Role of the U.S. Captive Tiger Population in the Trade in Tiger Parts Douglas F. Williamson & Leigh A. Henry A TRAFFIC NORTH AMERICA REPORT This report was published with the kind support of PAPER TIGERS? The Role of the U.S. Captive Tiger Population in the Trade in Tiger Parts Douglas F. Williamson and Leigh A. Henry July 2008 TRAFFIC North America World Wildlife Fund 1250 24th Street NW Washington, DC 20037 USA Visit www.traffic.org for an electronic edition of this report, and for more information about TRAFFIC North America. © 2008 WWF. All rights reserved by World Wildlife Fund, Inc. All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be reproduced with permission. Any reproduction, in full or in part, of this publication must credit TRAFFIC North America. The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC Network, World Wildlife Fund (WWF), or IUCN-International Union for Conservation of Nature. The designation of geographic entities in this publication and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership are held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint program of WWF and IUCN. Suggested citation: Williamson, D.F. and L.A. Henry. 2008. Paper Tigers?: The Role of the U.S. Captive Tiger Population in the Trade in Tiger Parts .
    [Show full text]
  • Petitioned the USDA
    BEFORE THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, WORLD WILDLIFE FUND, THE GLOBAL FEDERATION OF ANIMAL SANCTUARIES, THE INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE, BORN FREE USA, THE FUND FOR ANIMALS, BIG CAT RESCUE, AND DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY PETITIONERS PETITION FOR RULEMAKING TO PROHIBIT PUBLIC CONTACT WITH BIG CATS, BEARS, AND NONHUMAN PRIMATES Anna Frostic (D.C. Bar No. 977732) Kimberly Ockene (D.C. Bar No. 461191) The Humane Society of the United States 2100 L Street NW Washington, DC 20037 [email protected] Amended January 7, 2013 (originally filed October 18, 2012) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Notice of Petition…………………………………………………………………………...3 II. Introduction………………………………………………………………………………….8 III. Examples of Facilities that Offer Public Contact with Dangerous Wild Animals..9 IV. Legal Background and Authority to Amend Regulations…………………………..13 V. Current Handling Regulations Are Difficult to Enforce and Applied Inconsistently……………………………………………………………………………...19 VI. Public Handling of Big Cats, Bears, and Nonhuman Primates Undermines Animal Welfare, Public Safety, and Conservation and Must Be Prohibited…….23 A. Unmanaged Breeding………………………………………………24 B. Premature Mother-Infant Separation……………………………27 C. Excessive Handling of Young and Immature Animals………..34 D. Traveling Exhibition………………………………………………..35 E. Abusive Training, Declawing, and De-Fanging………………...38 F. Disease Transfer to Exhibited Animals……………………….…39 G. Risk of Physical Injury to Public During Handling……………42 H. Zoonotic Disease Transfer to Public……………………………...43 I. Risk of Injury to Public After Handling………………………….46 J. Conservation Impacts……………………………………………....49 VII. Proposed Amendments to Handling Regulations…………………………………….51 VIII. Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….…54 IX. Expert Declarations…………………………………………………………………..…..56 X. Appendices….………………………………………………………..….See Enclosed Disc A. Evidence of Public Contact by Licensed Exhibitors B.
    [Show full text]
  • OVERVIEW of Who Is Big Cat Rescue?
    Big Cat Rescue in Tampa Florida Who Is Big Cat Rescue 1 Table Of Contents Chapter 2 - Who Is Big Cat Rescue Chapter 3 - Non-Profit Ratings Chapter 4 - Award Winning Sanctuary Chapter 5 - Cable Television Segments Chapter 6 - Celebrity Supporters Chapter 7 - Area Business Affiliations Chapter 8 - How Big Cat Rescue Started Chapter 9 - The History & Evolution of Big Cat Rescue Chapter 10 - Cat Links 1 2 Who Is Big Cat Rescue OVERVIEW of Who is Big Cat Rescue? Big Cat Rescue is the largest accredited sanctu- ary in the world dedicated entirely to abused and abandoned big cats. We are home to over 100 lions, tigers, bobcats, cougars and other species most of whom have been abandoned, abused, orphaned, saved from being turned into fur coats, or retired from performing acts. Our dual mission is to provide the best home we can for the cats in our care and educate the pub- lic about the plight of these majestic animals, both in captivity and in the wild, to end abuse and avoid extinction. The sanctuary began in 1992 when the Founder, Carole Baskin, and her then husband Don, mistakenly believing that bobcats made good pets, went looking to buy some kit- tens. They inadvertently ended up at a “fur farm” and bought all 56 kittens to keep them from being turned into fur coats. See How We Started. In the early years, influenced by breeders and pet owners, they believed that the cats made suitable pets and that breeding and placing the cats in homes was a way to “pre- serve the species.” Gradually they saw increasing evidence that not only was this not the case, but that it was leading to a consistent pattern of suffering and abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Published As Perspective in on Culture: the Open Journal for the Study of Culture (ISSN 2366-4142)
    Published as _Perspective in On_Culture: The Open Journal for the Study of Culture (ISSN 2366-4142) OF ANIMAL LOVE AND ABUSE: EXPLORING AMBIVALENT HUMAN-ANIMAL RELATIONSHIPS IN TIGER KING (2020) DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC LIZA B. BAUER [email protected] Liza B. Bauer, M.A. is a doctoral researcher at the International Graduate Centre for the Study of Culture (GCSC) and holds a graduate scholarship from the Justus Liebig University Giessen. She studied Anglophone Studies in Marburg and Giessen and is currently working on her dissertation entitled Livestock in the Laboratory of Literature: The Cultural and Ethical Work of Farm Animal Representations in Anglophone Literary Thought Experiments. She further functions as one of the coordinators of the interdisciplinary research section “Human-Animal Studies” at her university’s Graduate Centre for the Study of Social Sciences, Business, Economics and Law (GGS) and works as an academic assistant for the International PhD program “Literary and Cultural Studies” (IPP) at the GCSC. KEYWORDS human-animal relations, tiger king, COVID-19, human-animal studies, pet-keeping, anthropocentrism PUBLICATION DATE Issue 9, September 3, 2020 HOW TO CITE Liza B. Bauer. “Of Animal Love and Abuse: Exploring Ambivalent Human-Animal Relationships in Tiger King (2020) during the COVID-19 Pandemic.” On_Culture: The Open Journal for the Study of Culture #9 (2020). <http://geb.uni- giessen.de/geb/volltexte/2020/15447/>. Permalink URL: <http://geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/volltexte/2020/15447/> URN: <urn:nbn:de:hebis:26-opus-154477> On_Culture: The Open Journal for the Study of Culture Issue #9 (2020): Love www.on-culture.org http://geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/volltexte/2020/15447/ Of Animal Love and Abuse: Exploring Ambivalent Human-Animal Relationships in Tiger King (2020) during the COVID-19 Pandemic _Abstract On March 20, 2020, Netflix launched a new hit.
    [Show full text]
  • Some of the Descendants of John Alford Ca1801 North Carolina Alford American Family Association Computer Designation JOH801NC Revised May 2013
    Some of the Descendants of John Alford ca1801 North Carolina Alford American Family Association computer designation JOH801NC Revised May 2013 Generation One 1. John1 Alford #1, born Betw. 1790-1800 in North Carolina, died Betw. 1833-1840 in Pickens Co. Alabama. He married John's Wife's Name Unknown. #2, born betw.1790 - 1800 in North Carolina, died betw.1833 - 1840 in Pickens Co. Alabama. Burial place is unknown. -Aunt Manza Tingle of Neshoba Co. Mississippi, daughter of John Madison Alford, said his brothers were George, Julius, and Duke; said their father was named John (but called Jack, as was son John Madison); and said the children were orphaned and parceled out to relatives. [Letters dated 1967 and 1983 from the late Herman Alford AAFA member #68 (grandson of John Madison) who thought the original John had lived near Carrollton in Pickens County, Alabama.] - The eldest brother George Washington Alford died intestate Sept. 19, 1878 in Noxubee Co. Mississippi apparently having never married. His probate (Chancery Case 803) provides the only legal evidence connecting the brothers and reveals sisters Adeline and Frances. A further petition in 1885 (Chancery Case 1160) by John Madison Alford, Julius C. Alford, and Frances Alexander located their brother Julius C. in Hempstead Co. Arkansas. That suit plus CSA pension application 2881 for Julius C. Alford and the widow’s pension application 3771 (both in Winn Parish, Louisiana) assured us that we had the correct Julius C. - Now Y-DNA test results from one descendant of Julius C., one descendant of Marmaduke, and five descendants of John Madison (including 2 generations) confirm our research.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Diabetes (Type 1): Symbiotic Ethics and Practices of Care Embodied in Human-Canine Collaborations and Olfactory Sensitivity
    Doing diabetes (Type 1): Symbiotic ethics and practices of care embodied in human-canine collaborations and olfactory sensitivity Submitted by Fenella Eason to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthrozoology in August 2017 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. Signature.................................................................. 1 ABSTRACT The chronically ill participants in this study are vulnerable experts in life’s uncertainties, and have become aware over time of multiple medical and social needs and practices. But, unlike the hypo-aware respondents documented in some studies of diabetes mellitus Type 1, these research participants are also conscious of their inability to recognise when their own fluctuating blood glucose levels are rising or falling to extremes, a loss of hyper- or hypo-awareness that puts their lives constantly at risk. Particular sources of better life management, increased self-esteem and means of social (re-)integration are trained medical alert assistance dogs who share the human home, and through keen olfactory sensitivity, are able to give advance warning when their partners’ blood sugar levels enter ‘danger’ zones. Research studies in anthrozoology and anthropology provide extensive literature on historic and contemporary human bonds with domestic and/or wild nonhuman animals.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Information About Form 990-PF and Its Separate Instructions Is At
    r -^ Return of Private Foundation OMB No 1545-0052 Form 990 -PF or Section 4947( a)(1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Department of the Treasury ► 2016 Information about Form 990-PF and its separate instructions is at www.irs.gov/form990pf. en o u Internal Revenue Service ► iFI nspect ion For calendar year 2016 or tax year beginning , and ending Name ofloundatlon A Employer identification number AMnR'P.g0W-'PnrCF.RG FnTTNnArPTC)N - INC'. 22-3052390 Number and street (or P O box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite B Telephone number 327 WEST 19TH STREET 212-989-9331 City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code C If exemption application is pending , check here NEW YORK , NY 10011 G Check all that apply: El Initial return El initial return of a former public charity D 1 Foreign organizations, check here Final return 0 Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, D Address chan g e D Name change check here and attach computation H Check type of organization: ® Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated 0 Section 4947(a)( 1 ) nonexem pt charitable trust El Other taxable p rivate foundation under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here I Fair market value of all assets at end of year J Accounting method: 0 Cash ® Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination (from Part 11, col (C), line 16) 0 Other (specify) under section 507(b)(1)(B), check here 1, column (d) must be on cash basis.) ► $ 14 8 41 313 .
    [Show full text]
  • May 1, 2020 Animal Welfare Act Inspection and Annual Reports for Gene Wheeler DBA Special Memories Zoo N1426 Midway Rd
    2020-APHIS-04196-F Brown, Ann Center for Biological Diversity 5/15/2020 6/15/2020 The Center and Xerces Society request from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Serv ce (“APHIS”): 1. From January 1, 2019 to the date APHIS conducts this search: a. The records between APHIS and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) for Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming mentioning or including endangered species and endangered species consultations, requests for concurrence and concurrence letters regarding grasshopper spraying for all the 17 states covered by the October 2019 Grasshopper Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Rangeland Grasshopper and Mormon Cr cket Suppress on; b. The records between APHIS and the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) only where relevant (California, Idaho, Oregon and Washington) mentioning or including endangered species and endangered species consultations, requests for concurrence and concurrence letters regarding grasshopper spraying for all the 17 states covered by the October 2019 Grasshopper Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Rangeland Grasshopper and Mormon Cr cket Suppression; c. The records discussing m tigation measures generally, and specifically records that include RAATS (including the terms “Reduced Agent Area Treatments” or “strip treatments”) to protect wildlife populations within treatment sites; and d. The record of analysis supporting the decis on for each treatment. Specifically: i. The Hopper analyses for each treatment; ii. The Finding of No Significant Impact (“FONSIs”) for all Environmental Assessments (“EAs”) that were finalized during the time period of interest; and iii.
    [Show full text]