Urban Development Models

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Urban Development Models SPECIAL REPORT 97 URBAN DEVELOPMENT MODELS HIGHWAY RESEARCH BOARD NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING SPECIAL REPORT 97 URBAN DEVELOPMENT MODELS Proceedings of a Conference Held June 26-30,1967 Dartmouth College Hanover, New Hampshire Subject Area 83 Urban Land Use viKc. yiGHWAY RESEARCH BOARD DIVISION OF ENGINEERING NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES^NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING Wadiington, D.C., 1968 PuUication 1628 c, Price: $7.00, Paper Cover $8.00, Hard Cover Available from Highway Research Board National Academy of Sciences 2101 Constitution Avenue Washington. D.C. 20418 HIGHWAY RESEARCH BOARD Officers and Members of the Executive Committee 1968 OFFICERS DAVID H. STEVENS OSCAR T. MARZKE Chairman First Vice Chairman D. GRANT MICKLE W. N. CAREY, JR. Second Vice Chairman Executive Director Executive Committee LOWELL K. BRIDWELL, Federal Highway Administrator, U. S. Department of Transpor• tation (ex officio) A. E. JOHNSON, Executive Director, American Association of State Highway Officials (ex officio) GEORGE C. SPONSLER, Executive Secretary, Division of Engineering, National, Research Council (ex officio) J. B. McMORRAN, Commissioner, New York Department of Transportation (ex officio. Past Chairman 1966) EDWARD G. WETZEL, Associate Consultant, Edwards and Kelcey, Newark, New Jersey (ex officio, Past Chairman 1967) DONALD S. BERRY, Chairman, Department of Civil Engineering, Northwestern University J. DOUGLAS CARROLL, JR., Executive Director, Tri-State Transportation Commission, New York City WiLUAM L. GARRISON, Director, Center for Urban Studies, University of Illinois at Chicago Circle Campus SIDNEY GOLDIN, Vice President of Marketing, Astatic Petroleum Corporation, New York City WiLUAM J. HEDLEY, Clayton, Missouri GEORGE E. HOLBROOK, Vice President, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company EUGENE M. JOHNSON, Chief Engineer, Mississippi State Highway Department PYKE JOHNSON, Retired THOMAS F. JONES, JR., President, Umveisity of South Carolina LOUIS C. LUNDSTROM, Director, Automotive Safety Engineering, General Motors Tech• nical Center OSCAR T. MARZKE, Vice President, Fundamental Research, 17. S. Steel Corporation D. GRANT MICKLE, Vice President, Automotive Safety Foundation LEE LAVERNE MORGAN, Executive Vice President, Caterpillar Tractor Company CHARLES E. SHUMATE, Chief Engineer, Colorado Department of Highways WILBUR S. SMITH, Wilbur Smith and Associates, New Haven, Connecticut R. G. STAPP, Superintendent, Wyoming State Highway Commission DAVID H. STEVENS, Chairman, Maine State Highway Commission JOHN H. SWANBERG, Chief Engineer, Minnesota Department of Highways K. B. WOODS, GOSS Professor of Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University Editorial Staff EARLE W. JACKSON STEPHEN MONTGOMERY BEATRICE G. CROFOOT Senior Editor Assistant Editoi Production Manager 2101 Constitution Avenue Washington, D. C. 20418 The opinionb and conclubionb exprebbca in thib publication aie thobe of the authoib and not necessarily those of the Highway Rebearch Board DEPARTMENT OF URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING Pyke Johnson, Chairman Washington, D. C. HIGHWAY RESEARCH BOARD STAFF James A. Scott COMMITTEE ON LAND USE EVALUATION (As of December 31, 1967) John R. Hamburg, Chairman Creighton-Hamburg Incorporated, Delmar, New York Frederick T. Aschman Walter G. Hansen Kenneth J. Schlager Robert E. Barraclough Biitton Harris Morton Schneider F. Stuart Chapin, Jr. George C. Hemmens David R. Seidman Salvatore V. Ferrera Donald M. Hill Joseph R. Stowers, Secy. Aaron Fleisher C. David Locks R. J. Wheeler William L. Garrison David D. Longmaid Lowdon Wingo, Jr. Ronald S. Graybeal Ira S. Lowry Richard D. Worrall David A. Grossman John K. Mladinov PREFACE This volume constitutes the record of a Conference on Urban Development Models held in June 1967 at Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire. The Conference was sponsored by the Bureau of Public Roads, the Depart• ment of Housing and Urban Development, and the Automotive Safety Foun• dation. The Conference was conducted by the Highway Research Board. Organization and direction of the Conference was the general responsibility of the Land Use Evaluation Committee of the Department of Urban Transporta• tion Planning of the Highway Research Board, and the specific responsibility of an Advisory Committee consisting of Britton Harris, Chairman, Charles H. Graves, Walter G. Hansen, Joseph R. Stowers, and Lowdon Wingo, Jr., and ex officio members John Hamburg, Chairman of the Land Use Evaluation Committee and George C. Hemmens, Conference Secretary. James A. Scott of the Highway Research Board assisted as staff liaison. With several exceptions the papers in this volume were originally prepared for and served as a basis for subsequent discussion at the Conference. The ex• ceptions are the paper by Britton Harris summarizing the Conference, and the papers by John R. Hamburg, Roger L. Creighton and Robert S. Scott and David Boyce which were commissioned by the Conference Advisory Commit• tee to complement Conference discussion and achieve comprehensive coverage of issues related to the development and use of models in urban planning. The organization of this volume follows generally the organization of the Conference except that papers presented at sequential Conference sessions have been grouped under common themes to which they are addressed. Pre• pared discussions of these papers, where available, are presented with the pa• pers. General, open discussion at the Conference has been summarized, where appropriate, under these general themes. One of the objectives of the Confer• ence was to promote free discussion of issues raised in the presentations, and drawn from the agency and research experience of all participants. It has not been possible to reproduce all of that discussion in this report. The sense of the discussion has been excellently reported by Britton Harris in his paper. The summaries of the discussion presented in the report attempt to document the principal comments, concerns, agreements, and disagreements of the parti• cipants, and have been selected and condensed from the Conference tran• script. The editor accepts responsibilities for any errors or misinterpretations which may have resulted, and begs the indulgence of the participants. George C. Hemmens, Editor May 1968 CONTENTS PART I. INTRODUCTION CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND . RECOMMENDATIONS Britton Harris 3 OPENING STATEMENTS Edward H. Holmes 18 William B. Ross 21 AGENCY EXPECTATIONS FROM PREDICTIVE MODELS Charles J. Zwick 24 PART II. PLANNING. DECISION-MAKING, AND THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS PLAN EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES: SOME ASPECTS OF DECISION REQUIREMENTS AND ANALYTICAL RESPONSE Wilbur A. Steger and T. R. Lakshmanan 33 COMMENTS: Lyle C. Fitch 72 Charles Graves 74 ACTIVITY SYSTEMS AS A SOURCE OF INPUTS FOR LAND USE MODELS F. Stuart Chapin, Jr 77 COMMENTS: Frederick T. Aschman 95 Daniel R. Mandelker 96 George T. Lathrop 100 TOWARDS A THEORY OF THE CITY Charles Leven 102 COMMENTS: Stephen Putman Ill Daniel Brand 112 GENERAL DISCUSSION OF PART II 116 PART III. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF MODELS SEVEN MODELS OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT: A STRUCTURAL COMPARISON Ira S. Lowry 121 COMMENTS: Brian Barber 146 Alan Black 149 David R. Seidman 150 DISCUSSION 154 ACCESS AND LAND DEVELOPMENT Morton Schneider 164 THE QUALITY OF DATA AND THE CHOICE AND DESIGN OF PREDICTIVE MODELS Wflliam Alonso 178 CONSTRUCTION OF MODELS Kenneth Schlager 193 Britton Harris 196 T. R. Lakshmanan 199 Boris Pushkarev 202 DISCUSSION 205 PART IV. USE OF MODELS SURVEY OF PLANNING AGENCY EXPERIENCE WITH URBAN DEVELOPMENT MODELS, DATA PROCESSING, AND COMPUTERS George C. Hemmens 219 EVALUATION OF LAND USE PATTERNS John R. Hamburg, Roger L. Creighton and Robert S. Scott 231 COMMUNICATION IN THE FIELD OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT MODELS David E. Boyce 239 APPENDICES APPENDIX A Agency Description of Urban Development Models ... 253 APPENDIX B Roster of Participants 263 PART I Introduction CONFERENCE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS BRITTON HARRIS * A major objective of the Conference on Urban Development Models was a state-of-the-art evaluation of land use modeling. The fundamental approach, however, was designed to be more than a didactic review of the past work; the aim was to discuss and open up new perspectives. This paper reviews the background of the Conference, summarizes the conclusions reached, and pre• sents the Conference recommendations. The Dartmouth Conference on Urban Development was held against a background of rapid but uncoordinated growth in the field of land use and ur• ban development modeling. The expansion of "modeling" in the physical, so• cial, and management sciences has had a long and respectable history, but its more recent explosion is largely a consequence of the advent of the computer. Transportation planning had employed an expanded battery of models which were largely developed in the decade 1945-55, before computers became available, and was consequently in the position to take major advantage of the computer facility, beginning in the middle of the last decade. Transportation- based modeling and planning were given a distinguished landmark appraisal in the publication of the May 1959 issue of the Journal of the American Insti• tute of Planners, under the editorship of Alan M. Voorhees. Land use planning models developed, first of all, as an adjunct of transpor• tation planning. This position eventuated because metropolitan transportation studies had both need and resources for the preparation
Recommended publications
  • NARSC News June 2016
    NARSC Newsletter Volume 4, Issue 1, June 2016 NARSC NEWS Words from the Executive Director Welcome to the June 2016 issue of NARSC News. I hope that everyone is having a productive summer. This November (9th-12th) the 63rd Annual North Issue 1, June 2016 American Meetings of the RSAI will take place in Minneapolis, Minnesota. I hope that you will join us for what promises to be another enjoyable and stimulating meeting. Our host will be the Mid- Featured Content: continent Regional Science Association. This year’s Fifty Years of the Regional local organizers are John Leatherman and Katherine Research Institute 2 Nesse of Kansas State University and the Program Chair is Haifeng Qian of The University of Iowa. The deadline for abstract submissions is July 1. Registration rates have been kept at the AERUS 5 same level as the last two years. Also please note that the deadline for submissions to the student paper competitions, is different than in the past. It has been moved up to August 1st to provide the judging panel Alonso Memorial Prize 6 with more time to review papers. More information about the conference can be found at http://www.narsc.org/newsite/conference/. In closing I’d Member Profiles like to thank our newsletter editors Liz Mack and Ran Wei for putting 8 together yet another informative newsletter. I look forward to seeing you Insu Hong in Minneapolis. Katherine Nesse Hao Huang Words from the Editors David Folch This issue marks the start of the third year of the newsletter. Thanks to the great Member Award Grants 11 membership, it has been possible to feature important contents and updates in the field of regional science.
    [Show full text]
  • NARSC News December 2017
    NARSC Newsletter Volume 5, Issue 2, December 2017 NARSC NEWS NARSC NEWS Welcome from the Executive Director Issue 2, December 2017 Thank you to everyone who made the 2017 North Issue 2, December 2015 American Meetings of the Regional Science Association International such a huge success. Featured content Approximately 600 regional scientists from across What to do (if anything) about 2 the world gathered in Vancouver, British Columbia Two Tales of Two States by 2 to share their latest research findings over three peripheralDan Rick man areas days of presentations. Alessandra Faggian Alonso Prize Co-Winners 2 In addition to dozens of breakout sessions, we had two interesting and Alonso Prize Co-Winners 3 highly informative plenary sessions - the RSAI Fellows Lecture Boyce Award Winner: 3 delivered by Mark Partridge of The Ohio State University and the BoyceNeil Reid Award Winner: 3 NARSC Presidential address delivered by Alessandra Faggian of the Sergio Rey Gran Sasso Science Institute. David Boyce of the University of Illinois, Isard Award Winner: 3 4 Chicago also delivered a very thoughtful Alonso Prize Lecture. IsardAlex AnasAward Winner: Conferences are successful because there are numerous people working Marlon Boarnet feverishly behind the scenes. To that end, I thank Hanna Maoh who Hewings Award Winner: 4 served as Program Chair. Hanna, ably assisted by Shakil Khan, did a HewingsDaoqin Tong Award Winner: 4 stellar job on putting together a fantastic program. John Leatherman, Riccardo Crescenzi for the second year running, served as Local Organizer – thank you John NARSC Student Paper 4 NARSC Student Paper 4 for another job well done.
    [Show full text]
  • CHRISTOPHER JENCKS Office
    7/17/2013 CHRISTOPHER JENCKS Office: Kennedy School of Government Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138 Phone: (617) 495-0546 Fax (617) 496-9053 e-mail: [email protected] Current Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, 1996 - present Employment: Malcolm Wiener Professor of Social Policy, 1998 - present Current Social and economic consequences of economic inequality Research: Intergenerational economic mobility School accountability systems Other Current Editorial Board, The American Prospect, 1989- Activities Advisory Board, Journal of Economic Perspectives Born: October 22, 1936 Education: Harvard College (A.B., English Literature, 1958) Harvard Graduate School of Education (M.Ed., 1959) London School of Economics (Sociology, 1960-61) Past Professor of Social Policy, Kennedy School, Harvard University, 1996-98 Employment: John D. MacArthur Professor of Sociology, Northwestern University, 1990-96 Professor of Sociology, Northwestern University, 1979-90 Professor of Sociology, Harvard University, 1973-79 Visiting Professor of Public Policy, University of Chicago, 1994-95 Visiting Professor of Sociology, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1977-78 Associate Professor of Education, Harvard University, 1969-73 Director, OEO Educational Voucher Project, Center for the Study of Public Policy, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1969-70 Executive Director, Center for Education Policy Research, Harvard University, 1968-69 Lecturer in Education, Harvard University, 1967-69 Resident Fellow, Institute for Policy Studies, Washington,
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Simulating Flows of Labor in the Middle East and North Africa Ismail Serageldin rQ~mhA EWilliam Alonso Public Disclosure Authorized Chang-I Hua :IE COPY Takashi Takayama SWP736 WORLD BANK STAFF WORKING PAPERS Number 736 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized L z WORLD BANK STAFF WORKING PAPERS Number 736 Simulating Flows of Labor in the Middle East and North Africa Ismail Serageldin William Alonso Chang-I Hua Takashi Takayama Bob Li The World Bank Washington, D.C., U.S.A. Copyright ) 1985 The Intemational Bank for Reconstruction and Development/THE WORLD BANK 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First printing August 1985 This is a working document published informally by the World Bank. To present the results of research with the least possible delay, the typescript has not been prepared in accordance with the procedures appropriate to formal printed texts, and the World Bank accepts no responsibility for errors. The publication is supplied at a token charge to defray part of the cost of manufacture and distribution. The World Bank does not accept responsibility for the views expressed herein, which are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the World Bank or to its affiliated organizations. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions are the results of research supported by the Bank, they do not necessarily represent official policy of the Bank. The designations employed, the presentation of material, and any maps used in this document are solely for the convenience of the reader and do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Bank or its affiliates conceming the legal status of any country, territory, city, area, or of its authorities, or conceming the delimitation of its boundaries, or national affiliation.
    [Show full text]
  • The William Alonso Memorial Prize for Innovative Work in Regional Science
    Nomination deadline coming up, July 1! The William Alonso Memorial Prize for Innovative Work in Regional Science The William Alonso Memorial Prize for Innovative Work in Regional Science was established in 1999 to honor the memory of a revered, pioneering scholar. In 1960 William Alonso was awarded the first Ph.D. in Regional Science by the University of Pennsylvania. The book based on his dissertation, Location and Land Use (Harvard University Press, 1964), is often credited with launching the field of urban economics. He made numerous major contributions to the study of migration, regional development, and the politics of numbers, and his work ranged from meticulous mathematical theory to far-ranging think pieces. William Alonso was Assistant and Associate Professor of Regional Planning at Harvard University (1959-67), Professor of Regional Planning at the University of California, Berkeley (1966-76), and Richard Saltonstall Professor of Population Policy at Harvard (1976-99). The objective of the Prize is to recognize the recent innovative research contribution of Regional Science scholars in the spirit of Dr. William Alonso. Previous Prize Winners are: 2002 Masahisa Fujita and Paul Krugman, The Spatial Economy (MIT Press, 1999) 2004 Jacques-François Thisse, Economics of Agglomeration (Cambridge University Press, 2002) 2006 Luc Anselin, Local Indicators of Spatial Association (Geographical Analysis, 1995) Ann Markusen, Sticky Places in Slippery Space (Economic Geography, 1996) 2011 Michael Batty, Cities and Complexity (MIT Press, 2007) 2013 Robert Sampson, Great American City (University of Chicago Press, 2012) 2016 David Boyce and Huw Williams, Forecasting Urban Travel: Past, Present and Future (Edward Elgar, 2015) Michael Batty, The New Science of Cities (MIT Press 2013) The next prize is scheduled to be announced in 2019 at the North American Meetings in Pittsburgh.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities, Race, and Urban Location: the Influence of John Kain
    Journal of Urban Economics 56 (2004) 70–79 www.elsevier.com/locate/jue Opportunities, race, and urban location: the influence of John Kain ✩ Edward L. Glaeser,a Eric A. Hanushek,b and John M. Quigley c,∗ a Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA b Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-6010, USA c Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3880, USA Received 10 February 2004; revised 8 March 2004 Available online 25 May 2004 Abstract No economist studying the spatial economy of urban areas today would ignore the effects of race on housing markets and labor market opportunities, but this was not always the case. John Kain developed much of urban economics but, more importantly, legitimized and encouraged scholarly consideration of the geography of racial opportunities. His provocative study of the linkage between housing segregation and the labor market opportunities of Blacks arose from his work on employment decentralization and constraints on Black residential choice. His later research program on school outcomes was similarly focused in how the economic opportunities of minority households vary with location. John Kain’s scientific work forms a legacy linked by the study of the urban disadvantaged. 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. JEL classification: R2; J7; I2 1. Introduction Today, economists routinely analyze the impact of place-based externalities on behavior and outcomes. Few studies of central cities, regardless of focus, can ignore the overlay ✩ John F. Kain died in Dallas, Texas on August 4, 2003 at the age of 67. A previous version of this paper was discussed at a special session honoring his memory at the annual meetings of the Association for Public Policy and Management, November 6, 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Land Use Allocation Models and Their Application to Planning
    REGIONAL LAND USE ALLOCATION MODELS AND THEIR APPLICATION TO PLANNING by URS JOSEF THICKER Dipl. Ing. ETH, Swiss Institute of Technology, 1965 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE. REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in the School of Community and Regional Planning We accept this thesis as conforming to the required staadard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA May, 1969 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and Study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Community and Regional Planning The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada Date April 30, 1969 iii ABSTRACT In the planning profession there is increasing recognition of the complex relationship of variables in an urban region which impede rational decision-making. In order to cope with this problem, quantitative models have been developed in recent years. It is the purpose of this study to investigate and evaluate the present stage of model- building as it applies to regional planning. It is hypothesized that the application of land use allo• cation models is a desirable aid for rational decision• making in regional planning. The study begins with an outline of the theoretical basis for building land use allocation models: economic location theory and social physics.
    [Show full text]
  • A General Theory of Polarized Development
    INT-2296 The Ford Foundation URBAN AND REGIONAL ADVISORY PROGRAM IN CHILE Santo Domingo 504, Of, 81 Santiago, Chile A GENERAL THEORY OF POLARIZED DEVELOPMENT John Friedmann December 1967 First draft 6/6? Revised draft 8/67 Revised draft 12/67 A GENERAL THEORY OF POLARIZED DEVELOPMENT John Friedmann Introduction In many parts of the world today, regional planning is considered along with national planning, as an important aspect of guided change in social systems. Regional planning is characterized by its focus on objectives for territorially organized — or spatial -- subsystems of national societies and, with growing frequency, also of multi-national systems. Although the practice of regional planning in this sense is becoming increasingly common, it still needs to be put on an adequate theoretical foundation. And the most appropriate theory, it would seem, is one that would set forth and explain systematic inter- actions between development and space, a theory, in other words, of the development process in its spatial dimension,^ Before entering upon a systematic presentation of -2- 2 this subject, competitive theories will be reviewed. Despite their shortcomings, these theories complement each other in a number of ways and may be relevant for specific kinds of planning analysis. In a number of important respects, however, they are all deficient as a general frame- work for regional planning. Classical location theory deals with the optimum lo- 3 cation of the firm. More recently, it has been expanded to include industrial complex analysis which, in turn, has led to the theory of "growth centers" as formulated by Francois Perroux and others'.^ In a perspective of regional planning, however, this theory is deficient because of its concern essentially with point locations rather than regional systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Biography of Paul Krugman
    Biography of Paul Krugman Born Feb. 28, 1953 Education Yale University, bachelor’s degree, 1974 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Ph.D., 1977 Employment Princeton University, professor, July 2000-present Massachusetts Institute of Technology, professor, Aug. 1996-June 2000 Stanford University, professor, July 1994-July 1996 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, professor, July 1984-June 1994 Council of Economic Advisers, international policy economist, Sept. 1982-Aug. 1983 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, associate professor, July 1980-June 1984 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, visiting assistant professor, Sept. 1979-June 1980 Yale University, assistant professor, Sept. 1977-June 1980 Other affiliations The New York Times, columnist, 2000-present Fortune magazine, columnist, 1997-99 Slate magazine, columnist, 1996-99 American Academy of Arts and Sciences, fellow, 1992-present Group of 30, member, 1988-present Econometric Society, fellow, 1987-present Institute of International Economics, member of board of advisers, 1986-present National Bureau of Economic Research, research associate, 1979-present Honors Nobel Prize in economics, 2008 William Alonso Memorial Prize for Innovative Work in Regional Science, North American Regional Science Council, 2002 Nikkei Prize for Excellent Books in Economic Science (with Masahisa Fujita and Anthony Venables), 2001 Adam Smith Award, National Association for Business Economics, 1995 John Bates Clark Medal, American Economic Association, 1991 George EcclesPrize for Excellence in Economic Writing, Columbia University Business School, 1991 Selected books “The Conscience of a Liberal,” W.W. Norton, 2007 “Microeconomics” (with Robin Wells), Worth Publishers, 2004 “The Great Unraveling,” W.W. Norton, 2003 “Fuzzy Math,” W.W. Norton, 2001 “The Spatial Economy” (with Masahisa Fujita and Anthony Venables), MIT Press, 1999 “The Return of Depression Economics,” W.W.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Great Barrington, Massachusetts
    RECREATION IN AN ECONOMIC BASE: THE CASE OF GREAT BARRINGTON, MASSACHUSETTS by EUGENE RICHARD DAVID ZOBA (B.S., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1960) Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master in City Planning at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY September 1965 Signature of Author . Departme o City/d/Reional Planning, August 24, 1965 Certified by ... -..... N. Thesis Supervisor Accepted by. .me Chairman, Departmental Committee on Theses 038 TAB LE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements .. .... .... ..... .... .iii Abstract .. ............. .......... iv I. Introduction . .... ... .... .... .... ... .1 The Perspective ...... ............1 Hypothesis and Purpose . ..... ..... ... 4 The Sample Community. ... ... .... ... 6 Types bf Recreation ....... ........ 10 Method of Study ..... ... .... ..... 12 Organization .... ..... ..... .... 17 II. Economic History of Great Barrington. .... .... ..... 19 Chronological P icture ... .... .. ..... 19 The Develdpment of Recreation . "... ... 23 Economic Changes in the Last Ninety Years .. .. 31 The Internal Adjustment to Economic Change . 33 Summary .. .. .. ... ... .. .. .. .. 53 III. The Economic Significance of Recreation ... ... .. ... .. 56 Labor Force .. .. .. ... .. ... .. .. 56 Sales . .. ... .. .. ... .. ... .. .. 65 Payrolls or Salaries ... ... .. ... ... 76 How Reliable are the Estimates?. .. ... ... 76 Results .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 78 -i- IV. Implications and Policy Considerations . ...... .... 81 Implications . ....... ....... ... 81 P olicy
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography I. Government Documents U.S. Congress: Acts, Reports, and Summaries United States (Congress). 1891–1990. Congressional Record. United States (Congress). 1990. The Immigration Act of 1990. United States (Congress). 1989. “The Immigration Act of 1989 (Symposium).” Congressional Digest 68 (October): 225–56. ———. (Congress). 1986. Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986: S 1200; PL 99–603. (6 November). ———. (Congress). 1986. “Should Congress Enact Senate-Passed Immigration Reform Legislation?” Congressional Digest 65 (March): 69–96. ———. (Congress). 1983. “Should Congress Enact the Pending ‘Immigration Reform and Control Act’? (Symposium).” Congressional Digest 62 (August/September): 195–224. ———. (Select Commission on Immigration and Refugee Policy). 1980. U.S. Immigration Policy and the National Interest. Washington, DC: GPO. ———. (Congress). 1980. Refugee Act of 1980: PL 96–212; 94 Stat. 102. ———. (Senate). 1979. US Immigration Law and Policy, 1952–1979. Report at the Request of the Committee on the Judiciary for Formulation of the Select Commission on Immigration and Refugee Policy. 96th C, 1st S. ———. 1979. Naturalization Laws. Washington, DC: GPO. ———. (Congress). 1978. Act of October 5, 1978: PL 95–412; 92 Stat. 907. (Com- bined hemispheric quotas into worldwide quota.) ———. (Congress). 1976. Immigration and Nationality Act Amendments of 1976: PL 94–571; 90 Stat. 2703. (Extended preference system to Western Hemi- sphere.) ———. (House of Representatives). 1965. Amending the Immigration and Nation- ality Act and for Other Purposes. Report 745 (6 August). 89th C, 1st S. ———. (Senate). 1965. Amending the Immigration and Nationality Act and for Other Purposes. Report 748. (15 September) 89th C, 1st S. ———. (Congress). Immigration Act of 1965: PL 89–236; 79 Stat.
    [Show full text]