Toward a Libertarian Society 2014.Indb

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Toward a Libertarian Society 2014.Indb TÊóÙ L®ÙãÙ®Ä SÊ®ãù Th e Mises Institute dedicates this volume to all of its generous donors and wishes to thank these Patrons, in particular: top dogTM ~ Anonymous, Michael G. Keller, DO ~ Anonymous (3), Wesley and Terri Alexander, Harvey Allison, Th omas Balmer, Steven R. Berger, Bob and Rita Bost, Mary E. Braum, Wayne Chapeskie, Andrew S. Cofrin, Mike Fox, Kevin R. Griffi n, Jeff rey Harding, Dr. Ronald J. Legere II, Robert A. Moore, Gregory and Joy Morin, Nelson and Mary Nash, Mr. and Mrs. William C. Newton, Paul F. Peppard, Rafael A. Perez-Mera, MD, Daniel J. Rozeboom, Chris Rufer, William P. Sarubbi, Donald E. Siemers, Henri Etel Skinner, Hubert John Strecker, John Tubridy, Joseph Vierra, Dr. Th omas L. Wenck, Brian Wilton, Tom Winn, Mr. and Mrs. Walter Woodul III, Guillermo M. Yeatts TÊóÙ L®ÙãÙ®Ä SÊ®ãù W½ãÙ B½Ê» M ISESI NSTITUTE Published 2014 by the Mises Institute. Th is work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Mises Institute 518 West Magnolia Avenue Auburn, Alabama 36832 mises.org ISBN: 978-1-61016-595-2 (paperback) ISBN: 978-1-61016-631-7 (large print edition) eISBN: 978-1-61016-629-4 (digital) To the Memory of a Great Man, Murray N. Rothbard CÊÄãÄãÝ Preface . 11 Introduction . 15 I. Foreign Policy . 19 1. Libertarian Warmongers: A Contradiction in Terms . .21 2. Bloodthirsty “Libertarians”: Why Warmongers Can’t Be Pro-Liberty . .24 3. Th irteenth Floors . .27 4. Let’s Go Commie, Well, Kerry. .29 5. Kill ‘Em All: Let’s All Turn Libertarian Warmonger. .32 6. Let the South Go: St. Abraham’s War and Current Foreign Policy . .35 II. Economics . 41 A. Microeconomics . 43 7. Market vs. State: It Is the Overriding Distinction in Economics and Politics . .43 8. What Do Boxing and Business Schools Have in Common? Th e Problem of Ratings . .47 9. Th e Motor Vehicle Bureau; Confronting It . .50 10. Want To Help the Poor and Oppressed? Encourage Laissez-Faire Capitalism, You Bleeding-Heart Liberal, You . .52 7 8 Toward a Libertarian Society 11. Want To Cure Poverty? Get the Government Out of the Market . .56 12. Airport Insecurity . .59 B. Macroeconomics . .64 13. Keep the Penny, Toss the Fed: On the Criminals Who Killed Th is Once-Useful Coin. .64 14. Private Enterprise and the Fed; What Should Be the Relationship?. .66 C. Environmental Economics . 69 15. Heroic Hunt Farms . .69 16. Me and Hurricane Ivan: Th anks a Lot, Government . .72 17. Me and Katrina: Weather Socialism. .76 18. Clean, Cool Private Water: Government Water Means Trouble . .85 D. Labor Economics . 88 19. Th e Evil of Unions; In the Public As Well As the Private Sector . .88 20. Is Th ere a Right To Unionize? It All Depends. .94 21. In Defense of Scabs; Th e Limited Justifi cation for Trade Unions. .97 22. Th e Yellow Dog Contract; Bring Back Th is Heroic Institution. .104 23. Stop Whining About Jobs; It’s Production Th at Counts . .107 III. Personal Liberties . 113 A. Feminism. 115 24. Four Firemen Die in Socialist Fire; Worse, Two of Th em Were Women . .115 25. Arm the Coeds . .118 Contents 9 26. Don’t Take Your Daughter to Work and Other Un-PC Th oughts . .121 27. Feminist Sports Fraud; High School Boys Are Better Th an the Top Women Athletes . .125 28. Term Limits Hurt Female Politicians; A Silver Lining . .128 B. Drugs . 131 29. Second Th oughts on Drug Legalization: It Means More Loot For the State . .131 30. Th e Libertarian Case For Drug Prohibition . .134 C. Charity . 138 31. Celebrities Engaged in Legalized Th eft . .138 32. Don’t Donate To the Red Cross. .140 33. Social Justice; A Scary Concept. .146 D. Medical. 149 34. Stem Cells: A Libertarian Compromise? . .149 35. Dr. Government; Th e Bureaucrat With the Stethoscope . .153 IV. Libertarian Theory. 157 A. The Basic Premises. 159 36. Turning Th eir Coats For the State. .159 37. Th e Libertarian Axiom and Jonah Goldberg, Neo-con . .163 38. Compassionate Conservatism . .166 39. Ideas Rule; For Good or Ill: Th e Importance of IdeologyGovernment . .170 40. Sex, Drugs, & Rock ‘n’ Roll; and Libertarianism . .176 B. Secession . 184 41. If at First You Don’t Secede, Try, Try Again. .184 42. Secession and Slavery . .188 10 Toward a Libertarian Society C. Punishment Theory. 193 43. Th e Death Penalty . .193 44. A Silver Lining in Unjust Executions?. .195 D. Politics . 199 45. Term Limits Make Me Sick; A Hoppean Analysis . .199 46. Federalism: Is It Libertarian?. 202 Thanks, Mr. Libertarian . 207 Index . 213 Preface hat sticks out at me is that libertarianism is a three-legged stool. It consists of foreign policy, economic policy, and policy concerning personal liberties. Wait. No. Th at is not Wquite right. Yes, libertarianism does indeed consist of these three “legs” but so does every other political philosophy — Marxism, Con- servatism, Left Liberalism, Progressivism, communism, Nazism, feminism — without exception. Th at is, every political philosophy, if it is to be a com- plete one, must address these three issues, wrestle with them, come to grips with them. Th e topics I address in this book consist of a quintessentially libertar- ian answer to these challenges. And, if this material is to be consistent with that philosophy, it must adhere, strictly, to the two elements, the only two elements, of libertarianism: the non-aggression principle and private prop- erty rights based upon homesteading. Does this book succeed in accomplishing that task? Th at is for others to determine. As for me, all I can say is that certainly I intend that it do so. For example, in the realm of foreign policy, the non-aggression principle would imply a policy of strict non-interventionism. Th is is not isolation- ism. Th e latter means that the U.S. pulls up its drawbridges, so to speak, and Americans have nothing to do with anyone in the rest of the world. Th at is not at all what the non-aggression principle requires. Citizens of 11 12 Toward a Libertarian Society our country should be free to visit, trade with, buy from, sell to, invest in, and allow investments from, people from all corners of the globe. It merely implies that the U.S. withdraw its hundreds of military bases from scores of other countries. Is this pacifi sm? Of course not. Th e proper role for the government of the U.S., to the extent that it has any proper role at all, is to engage in defense, not off ense. Every basketball fan knows the diff erence. It is when the other team has the ball that they yell “Defense!” It is too bad that the average American cannot be relied upon to make this distinction consistently. What would a proper foreign policy require? Something of the sort of a very powerful Coast Guard, ready to kick the butt of anyone who would dare attack us (and shorn of its responsibilities to interdict il- legal drugs, etc.). Th is is why, in section I of this book, dedicated to foreign policy, I have attempted, in my own weird way, to make the case that the U.S. is at present, not a country that implements a libertarian stance, but rather one of imperialism. It swaggers its way around the planet, launching drones at people, drowning people, and using other ways to kill people, virtually none of them who have ever attacked America. And in the cases they have done so, as Ron Paul correctly insists, it was due to blowback. Th ey are over here, he avers, because we were over there fi rst. Th e solution of course is to adopt the policy laid out by George Washington and Th omas Jeff erson, no “entangling alliances” and of John Quincy Adams, not going abroad in search of monsters to destroy. MYOB, mind your own business, is a far better policy than anything employed by the U.S. for most of its history. Emulating the foreign policy of Switzerland might be a good beginning. In section II of this book, devoted to economic liberties, I try to make the case that a free enterprise system is self-sustaining, maximizes wealth, and can do better, far better, without any “help” from the state. “I’m from the government and I’m here to help you” would be the diametric oppo- site of the viewpoint off ered here. For the so-called public sector is based upon initiatory violence, at least insofar as its compulsory taxation is con- cerned. And in the Rothbardian analysis, its triangular intervention, forbid- ding or compelling commercial interaction on the part of the residents of the country, hurts, does not help, economic well-being. My favorite chapter title in the microeconomics section is: “Want To Help the Poor and Op- pressed? Encourage Laissez-faire Capitalism, You Bleeding-heart Liberal, You.” Come to think of it, this applies as well to bleeding heart so-called libertarians. And this applies, in spades, to the macroeconomic sphere. Say what you will about microeconomic interventionism, it is by its very nature Preface 13 somewhat limited in scope. Not so the macroeconomic sphere, where the statists can do far more harm, in that their policies have an impact on ev- ery corner of the economy. It is important, too, to make the case for free market environmentalism, which is far from a contradiction in terms, no matter how our friends on the left wish it were.
Recommended publications
  • Block Versus Wisniewski: Not Over Yet
    Reason Papers Vol. 37, no. 2 Block versus Wisniewski: Not Over Yet Timothy Grisillo Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law There was a very insightful and entertaining exchange between Walter Block and Jakub Wisniewski regarding Block’s theory of evictionism that spanned several years.1 While I neither attempt to refute Block’s theory of evictionism nor attack Wisniewski’s opposition to it, I do put forth an observation that invalidates an analogy discussed extensively by both authors. My hope is that both Block and Wisniewski will acknowledge this flaw and renew their spirited debate. Block’s theory of evictionism distinguishes the act of ejecting a fetus from a mother’s womb from the act of ejecting a fetus from a mother’s womb and then killing it.2 The former is evictionism, the latter is abortion. Wisniewski offers his creative “airplane ride” analogy to illustrate what he believes to be an inconsistency between evictionism and libertarianism. Wisniewski’s hypothetical assumes that “X gets Y drunk to the point of the latter’s passing out and drags him onboard the plane, and then, as soon as Y 1 See Walter E. Block, “Rejoinder to Wisniewski on Abortion,” Libertarian Papers 2, no. 32 (2010), accessed online at: http://libertarianpapers.org/articles/2010/lp-2-32.pdf; Walter E. Block, “Response to Wisniewski on Abortion, Round Two,” Libertarian Papers 3, no. 4 (2011), accessed online at: http://libertarianpapers.org/articles/2011/lp- 3-4.pdf; Walter E. Block, “Response to Wisniewski on Abortion, Round Three,” Libertarian Papers 3, no. 37 (2011), accessed online at: http://libertarianpapers.org/articles/2011/lp-3-37.pdf; Jakub Wisniewski, “A Critique of Block on Abortion and Child Abandonment,” Libertarian Papers 2, no.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Years of First Amendment Lochnerism
    COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW VOL. 116 DECEMBER 2016 NO. 8 ARTICLES THE EARLY YEARS OF FIRST AMENDMENT LOCHNERISM Jeremy K. Kessler* From Citizens United to Hobby Lobby, civil libertarian challenges to the regulation of economic activity are increasingly prevalent. Critics of this trend invoke the specter of Lochner v. New York. They suggest that the First Amendment, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, and other legislative “conscience clauses” are being used to resurrect the economically libertarian substantive due process jurisprudence of the early twentieth century. Yet the worry that aggressive judicial enforcement of the First Amendment might erode democratic regulation of the economy and enhance the economic power of private actors has a long history. As this Article demonstrates, anxieties about such “First Amendment Lochnerism” date back to the federal judiciary’s initial turn to robust protection of free exercise and free expression in the 1930s and 1940s. Then, it was those members of the Supreme Court perceived as most liberal who struck down economic regulations on First Amendment grounds. They did so in a series of contentious cases involving the Jehovah’s Witnesses, who challenged local peddling taxes as burdening a central aspect of their missionary faith—the mass sale and distribution of religious literature. In dissent, Justice Robert Jackson warned that the new “liberal” majority’s expansive conception of First *. Associate Professor and Milton Handler Fellow, Columbia Law School. FoR conversation and counsel along the way,
    [Show full text]
  • Dec 2004 Current List
    Fighter Opponent Result / RoundsUnless specifiedDate fights / Time are not ESPN NetworkClassic, Superbouts. Comments Ali Al "Blue" Lewis TKO 11 Superbouts Ali fights his old sparring partner Ali Alfredo Evangelista W 15 Post-fight footage - Ali not in great shape Ali Archie Moore TKO 4 10 min Classic Sports Hi-Lites Only Ali Bob Foster KO 8 21-Nov-1972 ABC Commentary by Cossell - Some break up in picture Ali Bob Foster KO 8 21-Nov-1972 British CC Ali gets cut Ali Brian London TKO 3 B&W Ali in his prime Ali Buster Mathis W 12 Commentary by Cossell - post-fight footage Ali Chuck Wepner KO 15 Classic Sports Ali Cleveland Williams TKO 3 14-Nov-1966 B&W Commentary by Don Dunphy - Ali in his prime Ali Cleveland Williams TKO 3 14-Nov-1966 Classic Sports Ali in his prime Ali Doug Jones W 10 Jones knows how to fight - a tough test for Cassius Ali Earnie Shavers W 15 Brutal battle - Shavers rocks Ali with right hand bombs Ali Ernie Terrell W 15 Feb, 1967 Classic Sports Commentary by Cossell Ali Floyd Patterson i TKO 12 22-Nov-1965 B&W Ali tortures Floyd Ali Floyd Patterson ii TKO 7 Superbouts Commentary by Cossell Ali George Chuvalo i W 15 Classic Sports Ali has his hands full with legendary tough Canadian Ali George Chuvalo ii W 12 Superbouts In shape Ali battles in shape Chuvalo Ali George Foreman KO 8 Pre- & post-fight footage Ali Gorilla Monsoon Wrestling Ali having fun Ali Henry Cooper i TKO 5 Classic Sports Hi-Lites Only Ali Henry Cooper ii TKO 6 Classic Sports Hi-Lites Only - extensive pre-fight Ali Ingemar Johansson Sparring 5 min B&W Silent audio - Sparring footage Ali Jean Pierre Coopman KO 5 Rumor has it happy Pierre drank before the bout Ali Jerry Quarry ii TKO 7 British CC Pre- & post-fight footage Ali Jerry Quarry ii TKO 7 Superbouts Ali at his relaxed best Ali Jerry Quarry i TKO 3 Ali cuts up Quarry Ali Jerry Quarry ii TKO 7 British CC Pre- & post-fight footage Ali Jimmy Ellis TKO 12 Ali beats his old friend and sparring partner Ali Jimmy Young W 15 Ali is out of shape and gets a surprise from Young Ali Joe Bugner i W 12 Incomplete - Missing Rds.
    [Show full text]
  • WORLD BOXING ASSOCIATION GILBERTO MENDOZA PRESIDENT OFFICIAL RATINGS AS of OCTOBER 2005 Created on November 04Rd, 2005 MEMBERS CHAIRMAN P.O
    WORLD BOXING ASSOCIATION GILBERTO MENDOZA PRESIDENT OFFICIAL RATINGS AS OF OCTOBER 2005 Created on November 04rd, 2005 MEMBERS CHAIRMAN P.O. BOX 377 JOSE OLIVER GOMEZ E-mail: [email protected] JOSE EMILIO GRAGLIA (ARGENTINA) MARACAY 2101 -A ALAN KIM (KOREA) EDO. ARAGUA - VENEZUELA SHIGERU KOJIMA (JAPAN) PHONE: + (58-244) 663-1584 VICE CHAIRMAN GONZALO LOPEZ SILVERO (USA) + (58-244) 663-3347 GEORGE MARTINEZ E-mail: [email protected] MEDIA ADVISORS FAX: + (58-244) 663-3177 E-mail: [email protected] SEBASTIAN CONTURSI (ARGENTINA) Web site: www.wbaonline.com UNIFIED CHAMPION: JEAN MARC MORMECK FRA World Champion: JOHN RUIZ USA Won Title: 04-02-05 World Champion: FABRICE TIOZZO FRA Won Title: 12-13 -03 Last Defense: Won Title: 03-20- 04 Last Mandatory: 04-30 -05 _________________________________ Last Mandatory: 02-26- 05 Last Defense: 04-30 -05 World C hampion: VACANT Last Defense: 02-26- 05 WBC: VITALI KLITSCHKO - IBF: CHRIS BYRD WBC: JEAN MARC MORMECK- IBF: O’NEIL BELL WBC: THOMAS ADAMEK - IBF: CLINTON WOODS WBO : LAMON BREWSTER WBO : JOHNNY NELSON WBO : ZSOLT ERDEI 1. NICOLAY VALUEV (OC) RUS 1. VALERY BRUDOV RUS 1. JORGE CASTRO (LAC) ARG 2. NOT RATED 2. VIRGIL HILL USA 2. SILVIO BRANCO (OC) ITA 3. WLADIMIR KLITSCHKO UKR 200 Lbs / 90.71 Kgs) 3. GUILLERMO JONES (0C) PAN 3. MANNY SIACA (LAC-INTERIM) P.R. ( Over 200 Lbs / 90.71 Kgs) 4. RAY AUSTIN (LAC) USA 4. STEVE CUNNINGHAM USA (175 Lbs / 79.38 Kgs) 4. GLEN JOHNSON USA ( 5. CALVIN BROCK USA 5. LUIS PINEDA (LAC) PAN 5. PIETRO AURINO ITA l 6.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Misunderstood Rules in High School Basketball
    25 Misunderstood Rules in High School Basketball 1. There is no 3-second count between the release of a shot and the control of a rebound, at which time a new count starts. 2. A player can go out of bounds, and return inbounds and be the first to touch the ball l! Comment: This is not the NFL. You can be the first to touch a ball if you were out of bounds. 3. There is no such thing as “over the back”. There must be contact resulting in advantage/disadvantage. Do not put a tall player at a disadvantage merely for being tall 4. “Reaching” is not a foul. There must be contact and the player with the ball must have been placed at a disadvantage. 5. A player can always recover his/her fumbled ball; a fumble is not a dribble, and any steps taken during recovery are not traveling, regardless of progress made and/or advantage gained! (Running while fumbling is not traveling!) Comment: You can fumble a pass, recover it and legally begin a dribble. This is not a double dribble. If the player bats the ball to the floor in a controlling fashion, picks the ball up, then begins to dribble, you now have a violation. 6. It is not possible for a player to travel while dribbling. 7. A high dribble is always legal provided the dribbler’s hand stays on top of the ball, and the ball does not come to rest in the dribblers’ hand. Comment: The key is whether or not the ball is at rest in the hand.
    [Show full text]
  • WHAT LEADS to GOOD REBOUNDING: Knowledge Skill Determination
    WHAT LEADS TO GOOD REBOUNDING: Knowledge Skill Determination Knowledge Good rebounders understand the game. They study who shoots, when and from where. If you know a player likes to shoot the ball from the right corner, instead of working on something that is going to be non-productive, get yourself in a position to rebound when he/she gets the ball in the right corner. That is preparation that will allow you to overcome most players you have to rebound against. Good rebounders understand where the ball will go. Shots taken from the wing down to the baseline rebound back at the same angle or over at an opposite angle 80% of the time. Only 20% of shots rebound to the front of the rim. Shots taken above the foul line extended to the top of the key rebound 60% to the sides and 40% to the front of the rim. Good rebounders are proactive. Study where the shots come from and react accordingly before the ball misses. You might miss a few but you will get a lot. Good rebounders also understand that a long shot often produces a long rebound. Not always, but you have to play percentages. How long will the rebound be? Well that would be purely a guess. However, while we understand that being close to the rim is good for rebounding, you can be too close. Assume that EVERY shot will be a long rebound and position yourself as such. A good guide for position is the NBA charge/block arc in the lane.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Nevada
    STATE OF NEVADA BOXING SHOW RESULTS DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY DATE: JANUARY 12, 2002 LOCATION: COX PAVILION, LAS VEGAS ATHLETIC COMMISSION Referees: Joe Cortez, Kenny Bayless, Vic Drakulich, Tony Weeks Telephone (702) 486-2575 Fax (702) 486-2577 Judges: Robert Byrd, Carol Castellano, Chuck Giampa, Bill Graham, Robert Hoyle, Art Lurie COMMISSION MEMBERS: Judges: Keith Macdonald, Dave Moretti, C.J. Ross, Jerry Roth, Paul Smith Chairman: Dr. Luther Mack Visiting Judges: Chuck Hassett & Terry Smith Dr. Tony Alamo Amy Ayoub Timekeepers: Al Bisek & James Cavin John R. Bailey Ringside Doctors: Margaret Goodman, James Game, William Berliner & Jeff Davidson Dr. Flip Homansky Ring Announcer: Jimmy Lennon, Jr. & Jake Gutierrez EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Marc Ratner Promoters: Banner Promotions, America Presents Boxing, Main Events Matchmakers: Russell Peltz, Jim Waldrop, Carl Moretti Contestants Results Federal ID Number Rds Date of Birth Weight Remarks Freitas won by unanimous decision Suspend Casamayor until 03/14/02 JOEL CASAMAYOR **Freitas retains WBO & wins WBA CA045401 12 07/12/71 129.5 No contact until 02/27/02, left eyelid cut Suspend Freitas until 03/14/02 Miami, FL 130# titles No contact until 02/27/02, left cheek and ----- vs ----- Casamayor - Freitas eyelid lacerations ACELINO FREITAS 112-114; 112-114; 112-114 NV011527 09/21/75 129.5 Salvador, Brazil Byrd, Graham, Moretti Referee: Joe Cortez Hernandez won by unanimous decision Suspend Candelo until 03/14/02 JUAN CARLOS CANDELO **Hernandez wins vacant NABF CO039997 12 01/10/74 152.5
    [Show full text]
  • Judith Jarvis Thomson on Abortion; a Libertarian Perspective
    DePaul Journal of Health Care Law Volume 19 Issue 1 Fall 2017 Article 3 April 2018 Judith Jarvis Thomson on Abortion; a Libertarian Perspective Walter E. Block Loyola University New Orleans, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jhcl Part of the Health Law and Policy Commons Recommended Citation Walter E. Block, Judith Jarvis Thomson on Abortion; a Libertarian Perspective, 19 DePaul J. Health Care L. (2018) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jhcl/vol19/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Journal of Health Care Law by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Judith Jarvis Thomson on abortion; a libertarian perspective1 I. Introduction Abortion is one of the most vexing issues faced by society. On the one hand, there are those who favor the pro-choice position. In their view, the woman, and she alone (along with the advice of her doctor – but the final decision must be hers), should be able to legally determine on what basis, and whether, her pregnancy should be conducted. She should be as free to end her pregnancy at any stage of the development of her fetus, or give birth to it after the usual term of nine months. On the other hand, there are those who favor what is called the pro-life position. In this perspective, the fetus, from the moment of conception, is a full rights-bearing human being.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Benedict Option Taki: the Movie ANDREW BACEVICH Justin Raimondo ROD DREHER Taki
    One Percent America Kennedy’s Wars St. Benedict Option Taki: The Movie ANDREW BACEVICH JUSTIN RAIMONDO ROD DREHER TAKI NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2013 IDEAS OVER IDEOLOGY • PRINCIPLES OVER PARTY WHY THE TEA PARTY CAN’T GOVERN by DANIEL MCCARTHY $9.99 US/Canada theamericanconservative.com “One of the best liberal arts colleges in America.” - George Weigel DISCOVER THE DIFFERENCE Catholic Liberal Arts at Its Best! Enter Our Full-Tuition SCHOLARSHIP Competition! Rigorous Liberal Arts Curriculum Integrated Core Emphasizing Research, Written & Oral Communication Scholarships and Robust Financial Aid Program Integrated Career Development Program Leadership and Internship Opportunities Semester in Rome and Summer Ireland Programs Intercollegiate Athletic Program Drama, Music, and Performance Opportunities Mission Trips and Outreach Programs Authentic Catholic Culture and Liturgical Celebrations Front Royal, Virginia 800.877.5456 Tomorrow’s Leaders. Here Today. christendom.edu Vol. 12, No. 6, November/December 2013 2224 3228 40 COVER STORY FRONT LINES ARTS & LETTERS 12 Why the Tea Party Can’t Govern 6 Mike Lee, rugged 40 Goliath: Life and Loathing Its conservatism is a product of communitarian in Greater Israel by Max the disco era. JONATHAN COPPAGE Blumenthal DANIEL MCCARTHY 7 The magazine for crunchy cons SCOTT MCCONNELL GRACY OLMSTEAD artIcles 44 Rebound: Getting America Back 9 Britain’s Tories need a woman. to Great by Kim R. Holmes 16 Benedict Option EMMA ELLIOTT FREIRE JUSTIN LOGAN The promise of Christian 46 Conservative Internationalism: intentional communities COMMentary ROD DREHER Armed Diplomacy Under Jefferson, Polk, Truman, and 5 Turning right since 2012 20 One Percent Republic Reagan by Henry Nau Inequality applies to military 11 Has the NSA gone too far? MICHAEL C.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2002 (PDF)
    CIVILRIGHTS WINTER 2002 JOURNAL ALSO INSIDE: EQUATIONS: AN INTERVIEW WITH BOB MOSES FLYING HISTORY AS SENTIMENTAL EDUCATION WHILE WHERE ARE YOU REALLY FROM? ASIAN AMERICANS AND THE PERPETUAL FOREIGNER SYNDROME ARAB MANAGING THE DIVERSITY Lessons from the Racial REVOLUTION: BEST PRACTICES FOR 21ST CENTURY BUSINESS Profiling Controversy U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS CIVILRIGHTS WINTER 2002 JOURNAL The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is an independent, bipartisan agency first established by Congress in 1957. It is directed to: • Investigate complaints alleging that citizens are being deprived of their right to Acting Chief vote by reason of their race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, Terri A. Dickerson or by reason of fraudulent practices; • Study and collect information relating to discrimination or a denial of equal Managing Editor protection of the laws under the Constitution because of race, color, religion, sex, David Aronson age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice; Copy Editor • Appraise federal laws and policies with respect to discrimination or denial of equal Dawn Sweet protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice; Editorial Staff • Serve as a national clearinghouse for information in respect to discrimination or Monique Dennis-Elmore denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, Latrice Foshee disability, or national origin; Mireille Zieseniss • Submit reports, findings, and recommendations to the President and Congress; • Issue public service announcements to discourage discrimination or denial of equal Interns protection of the laws. Megan Gustafson Anastasia Ludden In furtherance of its fact-finding duties, the Commission may hold hearings and issue Travis McClain subpoenas for the production of documents and the attendance of witnesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 1. Post Play 2.Screening – Legal/Illegal 3. Charging/ Blocking 4
    FIBA Guidelines for Referee Education SCRIPT Points of Emphasis – Guidelines for Officiating INTRODUCTION 1. POST PLAY 2.SCREENING – LEGAL/ILLEGAL 3. CHARGING/ BLOCKING 4. REBOUNDS 5. UNSPORTSMANLIKE FOUL 6. ACT OF SHOOTING 7. FREE THROW VIOLATIONS 8. TRAVELLING 9. 24 SECONDS 10. GOAL TENDING & INTERFERENCE 11. TECHNICAL FOUL INTRODUCTION FIBA Logo & Title Points of Emphasis – Guidelines for Officiating Page 1 of 58 Montage of moments VOICE OVER (VO) from Athens Olympics, The Basketball tournament of Athens 2004 was one of the most including coaches brilliant events of the Olympic program. reactions, fans and major highlights. Generally the officiating of the games was of a high standard, contributing to the success of the tournament, with most situations well interpreted by all referees. However, there were a number of game situations and rulings that were reacted to with different perspectives and interpretations. This DVD is produced by FIBA to assist in focusing the spirit and intent of the rules as an aid to the training of all involved in basketball, including coaches, players and of course the referees. All references and examples where the calls were wrong or missed can’t be regarded as a personal criticism of any official. It must be understood that this is done for educational reasons only. 1. POST PLAY Montage of 3 point VO shots from Athens Modern Basketball has become more of a perimeter and outside Olympics & Post Play game due to the influence and value of the three point line and shot. However, strong and powerful pivot and post play remain an integral part of the game.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty, Property and Rationality
    Liberty, Property and Rationality Concept of Freedom in Murray Rothbard’s Anarcho-capitalism Master’s Thesis Hannu Hästbacka 13.11.2018 University of Helsinki Faculty of Arts General History Tiedekunta/Osasto – Fakultet/Sektion – Faculty Laitos – Institution – Department Humanistinen tiedekunta Filosofian, historian, kulttuurin ja taiteiden tutkimuksen laitos Tekijä – Författare – Author Hannu Hästbacka Työn nimi – Arbetets titel – Title Liberty, Property and Rationality. Concept of Freedom in Murray Rothbard’s Anarcho-capitalism Oppiaine – Läroämne – Subject Yleinen historia Työn laji – Arbetets art – Level Aika – Datum – Month and Sivumäärä– Sidoantal – Number of pages Pro gradu -tutkielma year 100 13.11.2018 Tiivistelmä – Referat – Abstract Murray Rothbard (1926–1995) on yksi keskeisimmistä modernin libertarismin taustalla olevista ajattelijoista. Rothbard pitää yksilöllistä vapautta keskeisimpänä periaatteenaan, ja yhdistää filosofiassaan klassisen liberalismin perinnettä itävaltalaiseen taloustieteeseen, teleologiseen luonnonoikeusajatteluun sekä individualistiseen anarkismiin. Hänen tavoitteenaan on kehittää puhtaaseen järkeen pohjautuva oikeusoppi, jonka pohjalta voidaan perustaa vapaiden markkinoiden ihanneyhteiskunta. Valtiota ei täten Rothbardin ihanneyhteiskunnassa ole, vaan vastuu yksilöllisten luonnonoikeuksien toteutumisesta on kokonaan yksilöllä itsellään. Tutkin työssäni vapauden käsitettä Rothbardin anarko-kapitalistisessa filosofiassa. Selvitän ja analysoin Rothbardin ajattelun keskeisimpiä elementtejä niiden filosofisissa,
    [Show full text]