DOCSLIB.ORG

Liverworts from the Largest of the United States

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Liverworts from the Largest of the United States Arctoa (2015) 24: 327-361 doi: 10.15298/arctoa.24.28 LIVERWORTS FROM THE LARGEST OF THE UNITED STATES: A CHECKLIST FOR MAINLAND ALASKA ЧЕКЛИСТ ПЕЧЕНОЧНИКОВ КОНТИНЕНТАЛЬНОЙ АЛЯСКИ, КРУПНЕЙШЕГО ШТАТА США LARS SÖDERSTRÖM1, ANDERS HAGBORG2 & MATT J. VON KONRAT2 ЛАРС СЁДЕРСТРЁМ1, АНДЕРС ХАГБОРГ2, МАТТ Д. ФОН КОНРАТ2 Abstract We report 294 liverwort taxa in 267 species for the State of Alaska, excluding the Aleutian Islands,15 taxa are listed as doubtful and an additional 17 of the previous reports are rejected as erroneous. The checklist is based on 417 literature references, including monographs, regional studies, and molecular investigations. The list represents the first compilation of liverworts from the region for over three de- cades. It is likely that a number of new records remain to be reported, based on regionally widespread species that have been recorded elsewhere. On the other hand, it is envisaged that a number of the taxa presented here may be synonyms of other taxa as they are taxonomically insufficiently known. Резюме Чеклист включает 294 таксонов печеночников, относящихся к 267 видам, известным с Аляски, не включая Алеутские острова. 15 таксонов отнесены к сомнительным, а eщe 17 исключены из флоры, поскольку выяснилась ошибочность определений. Чеклист основывается на 417 литературных источниках, в том числе систематических обработках, региональных флорах и заметках, а также образцах, цитированных в молекулярно-филогенетических работах. Список представляет собой первое за последние 30 лет обобщение по региону. Новые находки здесь вполне вероятны, учитывая, что не все распространенные на сопредельных территориях виды уже найдены в штате. С другой стороны, нельзя исключать что дальнейшие таксономические исследования приведут к сведению части таксонов в синонимы. KEYWORDS: Alaska, liverworts, checklist. INTRODUCTION scapes, the bryophyte flora remains relatively poorly Bryophytes are a major component of Alaska’s eco- known in comparison to the vascular flora and wildlife systems, as in many northern landscapes, dominating generally. This is especially the case for liverworts. plant biomass and production (Wielgolaski et al., 1981). We here present a checklist of liverworts for the State Bryophytes, together with other cryptogams generally, of Alaska (excluding the Aleutians) to summarize the play critical roles in the functioning of many northern current knowledge and further promote and encourage ecosystems of high latitude (Longton, 1997; Cornelissen bryological research in the region. The significance of et al., 2007) such as regulation of hydrology (Beringer et checklists was summarized by Söderström et al. (2007, al., 2001), carbon balance (Rydin & Jeglum, 2006), ni- 2008), outlining the utility of checklists as powerful and trogen fixation (Solheim et al., 1996), soil drainage (Vitt important tools, and their applicability to taxonomy, sys- & Pakarinen, 1977) and preservation of permafrost (Dyr- tematics, and conservation. ness, 1982; Yoshikawa et al., 2002). Given their impor- As with many other regions in the world, given the tance, changes in abundance and species composition of relatively poor historical focus on liverworts in Alaska, cryptogams in northern landscapes have significant im- it is likely that a vast number of new records are yet to be pacts on regional biogeochemistry and feedbacks to glo- reported. In this checklist we report 294 taxa in 267 spe- bal climate (Lang et al., 2011). Around the world, in- cies, with another 14 taxa questioned. Seventeen taxa cluding Alaska, oil and gas exploration and development are rejected as erroneously reported from Alaska. are moving into areas previously undisturbed by indus- Alaska is the largest of the United States. The conti- trial development (Wilson et al., 2013). Yet, despite the nental part covers 16 degrees of latitude stretching from ecological significance of bryophytes in northern land- Lake and Peninsula Borough at 55°N to Point Barrow at 1 – Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7498 Trondheim, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] 2 – Department of Science and Education, The Gantz Family Collections Center, The Field Museum, 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605, U.S.A. Email: [email protected]; [email protected] 328 L. SÖDERSTRÖM, A. HAGBORG & M.J. VON KONRAT Fig. 1. Terrestrial ecoregions of Alaska following Olson et al. (2001). 71°N. It covers 38 degrees of longitude from Ketchikan such as Alaska and elsewhere in the Arctic, is the vast- Gateway at 130°W to Nome census area at 168°W. Alas- ness and the inaccessibility of many or most regions ka is ecologically diverse ranging from coastal to upland (Gillespie et al., 2012). Despite this, there have been tundra, coastal to boreal forests, to vast ice fields (Fig. many avid collectors and an active interest in liverworts, 1). Wahrhaftig (1965) reported the great topographic di- especially since the 1950’s. Interestingly, Alaska is the versity of Alaska in detail and divided it into 12 physio- type locality for 23 described taxa, eight of which are graphic provinces and 60 smaller divisions. recognized by current taxonomy. It remains very evi- Hultén (1940) provided a detailed history of early dent that Alaska, in general, remains under-explored botanical exploration in the Alaska and Yukon territo- for liverworts and much yet is to be discovered. It is ries from the time of their discovery by Europeans in interesting that no hornworts seem to have been re- 1741 to the year 1940. Hultén provided a comprehen- ported from Alaska, or any other area of the American sive list of early collectors, including details of their arctic. exploration and voyages, collections, herbaria housed, MATERIALS AND METHODS and resulting publications. Steere (1978), Steere & In- Nomenclature and taxonomy follows the forthcom- oue (1978) and Davison (1993) provided historical ac- ing world checklist of hornworts and liverworts (Söder- counts of bryology in Alaska, including the North Amer- ström et al. 2015). Sources include 417 publications found ican Arctic in general. Steere (1978), focusing on the through the work with Early Land Plants Today (ELPT) Arctic, remarked that the bryophytes of Arctic Alaska database of liverwort taxonomy and distribution, and with remained almost totally unknown until the 1950’s, in some consultation with taxonomic experts. The check- stark contrast to Siberia, Arctic Canada and Greenland list follows a similar format of previous liverwort and that were relatively well known. The historically poor hornwort checklists by the authors, e.g., Java (Söderström knowledge of liverworts from Alaska had its roots in et al., 2010), Fiji (Söderström et al., 2011a), and Jamai- 18th and 19th century explorations and is summarized ca (Söderström et al., 2011b). The checklist distinguish- by an example offered by Steere & Inoue (1978). They es between records that are based on specimens (refer- noted that despite significant collections of plants, in- ence in bold) and second-hand reports, e.g., citations of cluding bryophytes, made by several important voyages earlier publications (reference in normal type). All names of exploration in the first half of the 19th century relat- used for the references are given in brackets after the ing to a search for a Northwest Passage through the taxon name with spelling variants/errors within quota- seas north of North America, only one species of liver- tion marks. Taxa are arranged in alphabetic order. Sig- wort was collected and recorded – the cosmopolitan nificantly, each accepted taxon is qualified using a four Marchantia polymorpha. One major challenge in areas level ranking system that indicates our level of knowl- Liverworts from the largest of the United States: a checklist for mainland Alaska 329 Fig. 2. Geographical regions used and the num- ber of species occurring in each region. For the ab- breviation of the regions, see text. The darker brown, the more species are reported from the region. The abbreviations are given in Table 1. Table 1. Abbreviations of regions of Alaska (see also Fig. 2) ACCEPTED TAXA AN Anchorage Borough Acrobolbus *** A. ciliatus (Mitt.) Schiffn. ASK: Worley 1970, Hattori BB Bristol Bay Borough 1975, Sharp 1987, Long & Grolle 1990. PH: Schofield 1988. BE Bethel census area DE Denali Borough Anastrepta DI Dillingham census area *** A. orcadensis (Hook.) Schiffn. ASK: Brinkman 1934, Frye FB Fairbanks North Star Borough & Clark 1945, Müller 1954b, Grolle 1966b, Hattori 1966, 1968, 1971, 1975, Schofield 1968, Worley 1970, Schofield KE Kenai Peninsula & Crum 1972, Damsholt 2002. KI: Persson 1946. PH: Evans KI Kodiak Island Borough 1915b, Persson 1946, Worley 1972. VC: Persson 1946, Ey- LP Lake and Peninsula Borough erdam 1952, Worley 1972. MS Matanuska-Susitna Borough Anastrophyllum NO Nome census area *** A. assimile (Mitt.) Steph. (Anastrophyllum reichardtii “re- NS North Slope Borough ichardti”). ASK: Stephani 1901c, Evans 1915b, Herzog NW Northwest Arctic Borough 1926, Arnell 1928, Brinkman 1934, Evans & Nichols 1935, PH Panhandle – this is a combination of ten Frye & Clark 1945, Arnell 1950, 1956, Müller 1954b, Grolle boroughs and census areas in the southeast of 1964b, 1966b, Hattori 1966, 1968, 1975, Hong 1966, 1996, Alaska Worley 1970, Schuster & Damsholt 1974, Godfrey 1977b, SF Southeast Fairbanks census area Long & Grolle 1990, Váňa 1991, Bapna & Kachroo 2000b, VC Valdez-Cordova census area Konstantinova 2000, Damsholt 2002, 2013, Schill & Long WH Wade
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Carolyn's Crown/Shafer Creek Research
    United States Department of Carolyn’s Crown/Shafer Creek Agriculture Forest Service Research Natural Area Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Guidebook Supplement 28 Report PNW-GTR-600 December 2003 Reid Schuller Author Reid Schuller is a plant ecologist and executive director of the Natural Areas Association, P.O. Box 1504, Bend, OR 97709. The PNW Research Station is publishing this guidebook as part of a continuing series of guidebooks on federal research natural areas begun in 1972. Abstract Schuller, Reid. 2003. Carolyn’s Crown/Shafer Creek Research Natural Area: guidebook supplement 28. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-600. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 22 p. This guidebook describes the Carolyn’s Crown/Shafer Creek Research Natural Area, a 323-ha (798-ac) tract of coniferous forest containing stands of 600- to 900-year-old old- growth Douglas-fir along the transition between the western hemlock zone and the silver fir zone in the Cascade Range in western Oregon. Keywords: Research natural area, old-growth forest, west-side Cascade Range of Oregon. Preface The research natural area (RNA) described in this supplement1 is administered by the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior. Bureau of Land Management RNAs are located within districts, which are administrative subdivisions of state offices. Normal management and protective activities are the responsibility of district managers. Scientists and educators wishing to use one of the tracts for scientific or educational purposes should contact the appropriate district office field manager and provide information about research or educational objectives, sampling procedures, and other prospective activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation
    Appendix K. Survey and Manage Species Persistence Evaluation Establishment of the 95-foot wide construction corridor and TEWAs would likely remove individuals of H. caeruleus and modify microclimate conditions around individuals that are not removed. The removal of forests and host trees and disturbance to soil could negatively affect H. caeruleus in adjacent areas by removing its habitat, disturbing the roots of host trees, and affecting its mycorrhizal association with the trees, potentially affecting site persistence. Restored portions of the corridor and TEWAs would be dominated by early seral vegetation for approximately 30 years, which would result in long-term changes to habitat conditions. A 30-foot wide portion of the corridor would be maintained in low-growing vegetation for pipeline maintenance and would not provide habitat for the species during the life of the project. Hygrophorus caeruleus is not likely to persist at one of the sites in the project area because of the extent of impacts and the proximity of the recorded observation to the corridor. Hygrophorus caeruleus is likely to persist at the remaining three sites in the project area (MP 168.8 and MP 172.4 (north), and MP 172.5-172.7) because the majority of observations within the sites are more than 90 feet from the corridor, where direct effects are not anticipated and indirect effects are unlikely. The site at MP 168.8 is in a forested area on an east-facing slope, and a paved road occurs through the southeast part of the site. Four out of five observations are more than 90 feet southwest of the corridor and are not likely to be directly or indirectly affected by the PCGP Project based on the distance from the corridor, extent of forests surrounding the observations, and proximity to an existing open corridor (the road), indicating the species is likely resilient to edge- related effects at the site.
    [Show full text]
  • And Liverworts (Marchantiophyta) of the Zackenberg Valley, Northeast Greenland
    Lindbergia 37: 66–84, 2014 ISSN 2001-5909 Accepted 17 October 2014 Mosses (Bryophyta) and liverworts (Marchantiophyta) of the Zackenberg valley, northeast Greenland Kristian Hassel, Harald Zechmeister and Tommy Prestø K. Hassel ([email protected]) and T. Prestø, The Natural History Dept, NTNU University Museum, Norwegian Univ. of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway. – H. Zechmeister, Dept of Botany and Biodiversity Research, Rennweg 14, AT-1030 Vienna, Austria. The moss and liverwort flora of Zackenberg valley in the Northeast Greenland National Park has been studied based on field investigations and literature survey. Altogether 212 taxa are recorded in the area� with 43 liverworts and 169 mosses. Five taxa are reported as new to Greenland Lophochaete fryei (Perss.) R.M. Schust.� Sphagnum orientale �.I. Savicz� Orthothecium lapponicum (Schimp.) C. �artm.� Pohlia vexans (�impr.) �. �indb. and Tortella alpicola Dixon. Additionally four taxa are reported as new to east Greenland; Grimmia plagiopodia �edw.� Riccardia latifrons (�indb.) �indb. Sphagnum olafii Flatberg and Tritomaria exsectiformis (Breidl.) Schiffner ex �oeske. The bryophyte flora of the Zackenberg valley is characterised by pioneer species adapted to disturbance by frost and wind� but also more stable communities exist especially at the lower part of the valley with wet to moist tundra. The Zackenberg valley bryophyte flora shows higher similarity with the flora on Svalbard (�1%) compared with Ellesmere Island (67% and 60% for liverworts and mosses� respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Bryophyte Surveys 2009
    Interagency Special Status Species Program Survey of Large Meadow Complexes for Sensitive Bryophyte and Fungal Species in the Northern Willamette National Forest Chris Wagner Willamette National Forest Detroit Ranger District District Botanist October 2011 1 Table of contents Introduction / Project Description……………………………………………………………..3 Sites Surveyed and Survey Results……………………………………………………………..4 Meadows, Information, Results…………………………………………………………………..9 Potential Future Survey Work………………………………………………………………………………14 References……………………………………………………………………………………….….…...15 ATTACHMENT 1: Regional Forester’s Special Status Species List for the Willamette National Forest (Revised 2008)……....................…………..16 2 Introduction Surveys were completed in 2010 and 2011 for large meadow complexes in the northern districts of the Willamette National Forest to determine whether any sensitive species of bryophytes or fungi are present. The type of habitat was also determined to clarify whether the habitat is a wet or dry meadow, bog or fen. Bryophyte identification was begun in 2010 with the first specimens collected and continued on through 2011 when most priority bryophytes were identified. The meadows selected represent the highest probability habitat for wetland bryophytes and fungi on Detroit and Sweet Home Ranger Districts. Some of these meadows may have been surveyed for vascular plant species in the past, but there are many new non-vascular sensitive species on the Willamette NF 2008 sensitive species list (see attachment 1) and additional species being being added to the proposed 2012 Regional Forester’s sensitive species list (unpublished). Meadows surveyed on the Detroit Ranger District included: Tule Lake meadow complex, Twin Meadows, Marion Lake meadow complex, Jo Jo Lake site, Wild Cheat Meadows, Bruno Meadows, Pigeon Prairie Meadow complex and Big Meadows. On the Sweet Home Ranger District Gordon Lake Meadows Complex was surveyed.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cape Town
    The copyright of this thesis rests with the University of Cape Town. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non-commercial research purposes only. University of Cape Town Addendum (1) Soon after submitting this thesis a more recent comprehensive classification by Crandall-Stotler et al. (2009)1 was published. This recent publication does not undermine the information presented in this thesis. The purpose of including the comprehensive classification of Crandall-Stotler and Stotler (2000) was specifically to introduce some of the issues regarding the troublesome classification of this group of plants. Crandall-Stotler and Stotler (2000), Grolle and Long (2000) for Europe and Macaronesia and Schuster (2002) for Austral Hepaticae represent three previously widely used yet differing opinions regarding Lophoziaceae classification. They thus reflect a useful account of some of the motivation for initiating this project in the first place. (2) Concurrently or soon after chapter 2 was published by de Roo et al. (2007)2 more recent relevant papers were published. These include Heinrichs et al. (2007) already referred to in chapter 4, and notably Vilnet et al. (2008)3 examining the phylogeny and systematics of the genus Lophozia s. str. The plethora of new information regarding taxa included in this thesis is encouraging and with each new publication we gain insight and a clearer understanding these fascinating little plants. University of Cape Town 1 Crandall-Stotler, B., Stotler, R.E., Long, D.G. 2009. Phylogeny and classification of the Marchantiophyta.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Field Manual
    DEMO Post-harvest Vegetation Sampling Field Manual Page 1 FIELD MANUAL FOR POST-HARVEST VEGETATION SAMPLING: 1999 DEMONSTRATION OF ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT OPTIONS (DEMO) STUDY Data Form Which Plots? Variables Sampled Page All All General Notes 2 Form U-A All General Plot Characteristics 3 Form U-B1 All (Wash. only) Bryophytes and Lichens in Harvested and Uncut Plots 5 Form U-B2 Harvested Herb Layer in Harvested Plots: Presence/Absence and 7 Numbers of Tree Seedlings Form U-B3 Uncut Herb Layer In Uncut Plots: Plant Cover, Height, and 9 Numbers of Tree Seedlings Form U-C Uncut Ground Surface Conditions in Uncut Plots 11 Form U-D All Tall Shrubs and Understory Trees: Cover and Height 12 Form U-E All Coarse Woody Debris 14 Form U-F All Natural Regeneration (trees 10 cm tall and 5 cm dbh) 16 Form U-G Harvested Planted Trees 17 Form U-G2 Harvested Planted Trees 18 Form U-H All Percent Overstory Canopy Cover—“Truck Mirrors” 19 Form U-I All Disturbance Assessment 20 Form O-A All Overstory Trees 22 Form O-B All Snags 24 Form O-C Variable Tree Heights 25 Form O-D All (Blks 5, 7, 8) Tree Mortality 26 Table 1 Forest/District Codes, Block Nos., and Declination Values 28 Table 2 Grid System Bearings 28 Table 3 Transect Bearings 29 Table 4 Slope Corrected Distances 30 Table 5 Vascular Plant Species Codes & Growth Form Assignments 31 Table 6 Cryptogam Species Codes 38 Figure 1 Vegetation Sampling Design 42 Figure 2 Coarse Woody Debris Rules 43 Figure 3 Line Intercept Methodology 44 Figure 4 Standards for Measuring Diameters of Trees 45 Figure 5 Log and Snag Decay Classes 46 DEMO Post-harvest Vegetation Sampling Field Manual Page 2 GENERAL NOTES "HEADER" INFORMATION ON ALL DATA FORMS The following "header" information⎯ present on all field sheets⎯ should be completed, prior to taking any measurements within a plot.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes of Lophozia. Vii. on the Distribution of Some Species of Lophozia in Georgia (Caucasus) Заметки По Роду Lophozia
    Arctoa (2013) 22: 121-123 NOTES OF LOPHOZIA. VII. ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF SOME SPECIES OF LOPHOZIA IN GEORGIA (CAUCASUS) ЗАМЕТКИ ПО РОДУ LOPHOZIA. VII. О РАСПРОСТРАНЕНИИ НЕКОТОРЫХ ВИДОВ LOPHOZIA В ГРУЗИИ (КАВКАЗ) VADIM A. BAKALIN1, 2 & KETEVAN TIGISHVILI3 ВАДИМ А. БАКАЛИН1, 2, КЕТЕВАН ТИГИШВИЛИ3 Abstract Revision of the liverwort collection in Tbilisi Institute of Botany (TBI) has revealed four Lophozia taxa new for the liverwort flora of Georgia : L. lantratoviae Bakalin, L. longidens (Lindb.) Macoun, L. perssonii H. Buch et S.W. Arnell and L. wenzelii (Nees) Steph. var. massularioides Bakalin. A com- ment on these new findings is supplemented by the list of all Lophozia specimens in TBI. Резюме При ревизии коллекции печеночников, хранящейся в Тбилисском институте ботаники (TBI), обнаружено 4 новых для Грузии таксона Lophozia: L. lantratoviae Bakalin, L. longidens (Lindb.) Macoun, L. perssonii H. Buch et S.W. Arnell и L. wenzelii (Nees) Steph. var. massularioides Bakalin. Приводится описание этих новых находок и список всех видов Lophozia с территории Грузии, образцы которых хранятся в TBI. KEYWORDS: Lophozia, liverworts, Hepaticae, Georgia, Caucasus. The last checklist of Georgian bryophytes was pub- ca (Nees ex Hueb.) Konstant. et Vilnet (= Lophozia su- lished at 2004 (Chikovani & Svanidze, 2004). It includes detica)) (Konstantinova & Vilnet, 2009). These “super- data on distribution of 174 taxa of hepatics (3 hornworts splitted” genera, however, are not distinct in morpholo- and 171 liverworts) within administrative subunits and gy, so we retain Lophozia in the sense of Schljakov’s represents a shortened version of conspectus published (1980) Lophozia or Lophozia subg. Lophozia sensu 18 years before (Chikovani, 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • North American H&A Names
    A very tentative and preliminary list of North American liverworts and hornworts, doubtless containing errors and omissions, but forming a basis for updating the spreadsheet of recognized genera and numbers of species, November 2010. Liverworts Blasiales Blasiaceae Blasia L. Blasia pusilla L. Fossombroniales Calyculariaceae Calycularia Mitt. Calycularia crispula Mitt. Calycularia laxa Lindb. & Arnell Fossombroniaceae Fossombronia Raddi Fossombronia alaskana Steere & Inoue Fossombronia brasiliensis Steph. Fossombronia cristula Austin Fossombronia foveolata Lindb. Fossombronia hispidissima Steph. Fossombronia lamellata Steph. Fossombronia macounii Austin Fossombronia marshii J. R. Bray & Stotler Fossombronia pusilla (L.) Dumort. Fossombronia longiseta (Austin) Austin Note: Fossombronia longiseta was based on a mixture of material belonging to three different species of Fossombronia; Schuster (1992a p. 395) lectotypified F. longiseta with the specimen of Austin, Hepaticae Boreali-Americani 118 at H. An SEM of one spore from this specimen was previously published by Scott and Pike (1988 fig. 19) and it is clearly F. pusilla. It is not at all clear why Doyle and Stotler (2006) apply the name to F. hispidissima. Fossombronia texana Lindb. Fossombronia wondraczekii (Corda) Dumort. Fossombronia zygospora R.M. Schust. Petalophyllum Nees & Gottsche ex Lehm. Petalophyllum ralfsii (Wilson) Nees & Gottsche ex Lehm. Moerckiaceae Moerckia Gottsche Moerckia blyttii (Moerch) Brockm. Moerckia hibernica (Hook.) Gottsche Pallaviciniaceae Pallavicinia A. Gray, nom. cons. Pallavicinia lyellii (Hook.) Carruth. Pelliaceae Pellia Raddi, nom. cons. Pellia appalachiana R.M. Schust. (pro hybr.) Pellia endiviifolia (Dicks.) Dumort. Pellia endiviifolia (Dicks.) Dumort. ssp. alpicola R.M. Schust. Pellia endiviifolia (Dicks.) Dumort. ssp. endiviifolia Pellia epiphylla (L.) Corda Pellia megaspora R.M. Schust. Pellia neesiana (Gottsche) Limpr. Pellia neesiana (Gottsche) Limpr.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3-1 Sexuality: Sexual Strategies Janice M
    Glime, J. M. and Bisang, I. 2017. Sexuality: Sexual Strategies. Chapt. 3-1. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. 3-1-1 Physiological Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 2 April 2017 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 3-1 SEXUALITY: SEXUAL STRATEGIES JANICE M. GLIME AND IRENE BISANG TABLE OF CONTENTS Expression of Sex............................................................................................................................................... 3-1-2 Unisexual and Bisexual Taxa............................................................................................................................. 3-1-2 Sex Chromosomes....................................................................................................................................... 3-1-6 An unusual Y Chromosome........................................................................................................................ 3-1-7 Gametangial Arrangement.......................................................................................................................... 3-1-8 Origin of Bisexuality in Bryophytes ................................................................................................................ 3-1-11 Monoicy as a Derived/Advanced Character.............................................................................................. 3-1-11 Anthocerotophyta and Multiple Reversals...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Article ISSN 1179-3163 (Online Edition)
    Phytotaxa 63: 21–68 (2012) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2012 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) Early Land Plants Today: Index of Liverworts & Hornworts 2009–2010 LARS SÖDERSTRÖM1, ANDERS HAGBORG2, MARSHALL R. CROSBY3 & MATT VON KONRAT2 1 Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway; [email protected] 2 Department of Botany, The Field Museum, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605–2496, U.S.A.;[email protected], [email protected] 3 Missouri Botanical Garden, P. O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166–0299 U.S.A.; [email protected] Abstract A widely accessible list of known plant species is a fundamental requirement for plant conservation and has vast applications. An index of published names of liverworts and hornworts between 2009 and 2010 is provided as part of a continued effort in working toward producing a world checklist of this group. Included in the list are also names overlooked by earlier indices. The list includes 30 higher taxa, 250 species, 52 infraspecific taxa, 31 autonyms, and two fossils for 2009 and 2010. A number of taxa not covered by the earlier indices for 2000-2008 are also included. Key words: Liverworts, hornworts, index, nomenclature Introduction Under the auspices of the Early Land Plants Today project, there has been a strong community-driven effort attempting to address the critical need to synthesize the vast nomenclatural, taxonomic and global distributional data for liverworts (Marchantiophyta) and hornworts (Anthocerotophyta) (von Konrat et al. 2010a). These endeavours are critical in providing the foundation to develop a working checklist of liverworts and hornworts worldwide; the first version is projected to be published in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryophyte Ecology Table of Contents
    Glime, J. M. 2020. Table of Contents. Bryophyte Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University 1 and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 15 July 2020 and available at <https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. This file will contain all the volumes, chapters, and headings within chapters to help you find what you want in the book. Once you enter a chapter, there will be a table of contents with clickable page numbers. To search the list, check the upper screen of your pdf reader for a search window or magnifying glass. If there is none, try Ctrl G to open one. TABLE OF CONTENTS BRYOPHYTE ECOLOGY VOLUME 1: PHYSIOLOGICAL ECOLOGY Chapter in Volume 1 1 INTRODUCTION Thinking on a New Scale Adaptations to Land Minimum Size Do Bryophytes Lack Diversity? The "Moss" What's in a Name? Phyla/Divisions Role of Bryology 2 LIFE CYCLES AND MORPHOLOGY 2-1: Meet the Bryophytes Definition of Bryophyte Nomenclature What Makes Bryophytes Unique Who are the Relatives? Two Branches Limitations of Scale Limited by Scale – and No Lignin Limited by Scale – Forced to Be Simple Limited by Scale – Needing to Swim Limited by Scale – and Housing an Embryo Higher Classifications and New Meanings New Meanings for the Term Bryophyte Differences within Bryobiotina 2-2: Life Cycles: Surviving Change The General Bryobiotina Life Cycle Dominant Generation The Life Cycle Life Cycle Controls Generation Time Importance Longevity and Totipotency 2-3: Marchantiophyta Distinguishing Marchantiophyta Elaters Leafy or Thallose? Class
    [Show full text]
  • Phytotaxa, Taxonomic Novelties Resulting from Recent Reclassification of the Lophoziaceae
    Phytotaxa 3: 47–53 (2010) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ Article PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2010 • Magnolia Press ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) Taxonomic novelties resulting from recent reclassification of the Lophoziaceae/ Scapaniaceae clade LARS SÖDERSTRÖM1, RYAN DE ROO2 & TERRY HEDDERSON2 1 Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway email: [email protected] 2 Bolus Herbarium, Department of Botany, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa email: [email protected] Abstract A new family, Anastrophyllaceae, is segregated from Lophoziaceae, two new genera, Neoorthocaulis and Oleolophozia are described and the following new combinations are made: Neoorthocaulis attenuatus, N. binsteadii, N. floerkei, N. hyperboreus, Barbilophozia subgen. Sudeticae, Barbilophozia sudetica and Oleolophozia perssonii. Key words: Anastrophyllaceae, liverworts, Neoorthocaulis, Oleolophozia, Barbilophozia Introduction The Lophoziaceae has previously been either recognized as a separate family (e.g. Grolle & Long 2000) or placed in the synonymy of Jungermanniaceae (e.g. Damsholt 2002). Recent molecular work (De Roo et al. 2007) has shown that the two are not particularly closely related and that Lophoziaceae should be retained as a separate family. However, molecular data (Schill et al. 2004) also show that the family Scapaniaceae is nested within Lophoziaceae, a pattern confirmed by, inter alia, Yatsentyuk et al. (2004), Davis (2004) and De Roo et al. (2007). Those studies also exclude two elements frequently included in Lophoziaceae in the past— the family Jamesoniellaceae and the genus Leiocolea (Müller 1913: 711) Buch (1933: 288). However, some recent studies (De Roo et al. 2007 and unpublished results by R.
    [Show full text]