DOCSLIB.ORG

Recent Development Ofthe Neutral Theory Viewed from The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recent Development Ofthe Neutral Theory Viewed from The Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 88, pp. 5%9-5973, July 1991 Evolution Recent development of the neutral theory viewed from the Wrightian tradition of theoretical population genetics* (molecular evolution/population genetics/macroevolution) MOToo KIMURA National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, 411 Japan Contributed by Motoo Kimura, April 1, 1991 ABSTRACT In contrast to the Darwinian theory of evo- continued mutation pressure (for details, see ref. 8). This lution by natural selection, the neutral theory emphasizes the view is in sharp contrast to the traditional neo-Darwinian great importance of random genetic drift (due to rinite popu- (i.e., the synthetic) theory ofevolution, which claims that the lation size) and mutation pressure as the main causes of spreading of mutants within the species in the course of molecular evolution. In this paper, after a brief review of the evolution can occur only with the help of positive natural neutral theory, recent data strongly supporting the neutral selection. theory are presented. Also discussed are such topics as com- The neutral theory also asserts that most intraspecific pensatory neutral evolution and an approach to a unified variability at the molecular level (including protein and DNA understanding of molecular and phenotypic evolution. It is polymorphisms) is selectively neutral, and it is maintained in concluded that random genetic drift acting on selectively the species by the balance between mutational input and neutral mutants must have played some very important role in random extinction. In other words, the neutral theory regards organic evolution, including the origin of life and macroevo- protein and DNA polymorphisms as a transient phase of lution. molecular evolution (9) and rejects the notion that the ma- jority of such polymorphisms are adaptive and actively The late Professor Sewall Wright was my idol when I was maintained in the species by some form of balancing selec- young. Soon after graduating from Kyoto University, I read tion. Wright's 1931 classic "Evolution in Mendelian populations" The neutral theory differs from traditional theories of (1) and his subsequent papers on random genetic drift and the evolution in that it is quantitative-namely, we can derive distribution of gene frequencies [such as refs. 2-5; see also simple formulae for such quantities as the rate of evolution Provine (6) for additional references]. These papers im- and the amount of intraspecific variability-and in that we pressed me deeply and, in fact, inspired me to become a can check the validity of the formulae by comparing theo- theoretical population geneticist. Without this foundation I retical predictions with actual data. would never have been able to propose the neutral theory or First, let us consider the cumulative process in which to incorporate new knowledge from molecular genetics into neutral mutants are substituted sequentially at a given locus the framework of population genetics. or site through random genetic drift under continued input of When the neutral theory was proposed (7), the only avail- new mutants. Then we have for the rate of evolution per able data consisted ofamino acid sequences ofa few proteins generation the formula in related organisms, such as hemoglobin molecules in some vertebrate species. Also, genetic variability at the molecular kg= Vo, [1] level could be inferred only from electrophoretic data on where kg represents the long-term average per generation of enzyme polymorphisms for a few species such as fruit flies the number of mutants that spread through the population and humans. Resolution ofthe ensuing controversy regarding and vo is the rate of production of neutral mutants per locus the pros and cons ofthe neutral theory ofmolecular evolution (or site) per generation. This formula is based on the well- was much limited by nonavailability of DNA data. The known property (7, 10) that, for neutral mutations, the situation has changed dramatically with the emergence of long-term rate of mutant substitution is equal to the mutation DNA sequence data, which resulted from the development of rate. rapid DNA sequencing techniques. I am glad to note that, If we denote by VT the total mutation rate, and iffo is the following this development, strong evidence for the neutral fraction of neutral mutations at the time of occurrence, so theory has accumulated steadily with the passage of time, that = VO/VT, then Eq. 1 may be rewritten as particularly during the past decade. fo In this paper I shall review recent developments of mo- kg = VTfO. [2] lecular evolutionary studies from the standpoint of the neu- tral theory. I shall also discuss some neutralist views on Advantageous mutations may occur, but the neutral theory evolution in general. assumes that they are so rare that they may be neglected in our quantitative consideration. Thus, (1 - fo) represents the Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution fraction of definitely deleterious mutants that are eliminated from the population without contributing to either evolution According to the neutral theory, the great majority of evo- or polymorphism, even though the selective disadvantages lutionary mutant substitutions at the molecular level are involved may be very small in the ordinary sense. The above caused by random fixation, through sampling drift, of selec- formulation has a remarkable simplicity in that the evolu- tively neutral (i.e., selectively equivalent) mutants under tionary rate (on the long-term basis) is independent of pop- ulation size and environmental conditions of each organism. The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" *This paper is an extended version of my talk presented at the Sewall in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. Wright Centennial Symposium, Madison, WI, June 8-9, 1990. 5969 Downloaded by guest on September 25, 2021 5970 Evolution: Kimura Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88 (1991) In molecular evolutionary studies, it is customary to mea- than in rodents (16, 17). According to my estimate (18), the sure the evolutionary rate in terms of years (i.e., taking one mouse line evolves faster than the human line with respect to year as the unit length of time) rather than in generations. amino acid replacements per year in hemoglobin a and X3 Therefore, it is convenient to modify Eq. 2 so that it gives the chains by a factor of 34.5/14.6, or approximately 2.4. Note evolutionary rate per year. that, from the standpoint ofthe neutral theory, the difference of the evolutionary rates in these lines is caused by the k, = (vT/g)fO. [31 difference in their neutral mutation rates per year. Thus, In this formula, g stands for the generation span (in years), assuming an average generation span of 20 years for the and VT/g is the total mutation rate per year. human lineage, the total mutation rate per generation is Next, let us consider intraspecific variability, assuming neutral mutations. For the average heterozygosity per nucle- VT = (3 X 109) x (5 X 10 9) X 20 2.4, otide site we have the following formula: or VT = 125.0, which means that the total number of new mutations per generation due to base substitutions amounts H = 4NeVonuc), [4] to 125 per gamete, and twice as many per zygote. where Ne is the effective population size and VO(nuc) is the In the above calculation, we assumed that the mouse line neutral mutation rate per nucleotide site. I first derived this evolved 2.4 times faster than the human line. It is possible, formula by using the "infinite site model" (11). and also likely, however, that this is an underestimate. In fact, Li and Tanimura (19) obtained a result that the rate of Some Recent Data Supporting the Neutral Theory of synonymous substitutions in rodents is about 7 times higher Molecular Evolution than that in higher primates. If we adopt this estimate, we obtain VT 43, which is about 1/3 of the above estimate. Still, The first definitive evidence supporting the neutral theory this is a very high value when compared with the traditional was the discovery that synonymous base substitutions, estimates of the genomic mutation rate. From the consider- which do not cause amino acid changes, almost always occur ation ofgenetic load (cf. ref. 20), the mutational load becomes at much higher rate than nonsynonymous-that is, amino- intolerably high unless the great majority (say, 99.5%) of acid-altering-substitutions. It was also found that evolution- them are selectively neutral (i.e., nondeleterious). ary base substitutions at other "silent" sites, such as introns, An equally interesting example suggesting neutral evolu- occur at comparably high rates. These observations suggest tion is the recent observation that the evolutionary rate of the that molecular changes that are less likely to be subjected to eye lens protein aA-crystallin has been much enhanced in the natural selection occur more frequently in evolution and blind mole rat, Spalax ehrenbergi (21). This animal is com- therefore show higher evolutionary rates. This is easy to pletely blind and is adapted to a burrowing subterranean way understand from the neutral theory, because such changes of life (and possibly has been for the last 25 million years, are more likely to turn out to be nondeleterious (i.e., selec- according to fossil evidence). Although this animal is com- tively neutral) and therefore fo in Eq. 2 is larger for them. pletely blind, the crystallins are still expressed in the atro- More than a decade and a half ago, in collaboration with phied lens cells. Generally speaking, aA-crystallin is a slowly Ohta, I enumerated (12) five principles that govern molecular evolving protein, with an average replacement rate of about evolution, one ofwhich states that functionally less important 0.3 x 10-9 per amino acid site per year in rodents and other molecules or parts of a molecule evolve (in terms of mutant vertebrates.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aliens of Marvel Universe
    Index DEM's Foreword: 2 GUNA 42 RIGELLIANS 26 AJM’s Foreword: 2 HERMS 42 R'MALK'I 26 TO THE STARS: 4 HIBERS 16 ROCLITES 26 Building a Starship: 5 HORUSIANS 17 R'ZAHNIANS 27 The Milky Way Galaxy: 8 HUJAH 17 SAGITTARIANS 27 The Races of the Milky Way: 9 INTERDITES 17 SARKS 27 The Andromeda Galaxy: 35 JUDANS 17 Saurids 47 Races of the Skrull Empire: 36 KALLUSIANS 39 sidri 47 Races Opposing the Skrulls: 39 KAMADO 18 SIRIANS 27 Neutral/Noncombatant Races: 41 KAWA 42 SIRIS 28 Races from Other Galaxies 45 KLKLX 18 SIRUSITES 28 Reference points on the net 50 KODABAKS 18 SKRULLS 36 AAKON 9 Korbinites 45 SLIGS 28 A'ASKAVARII 9 KOSMOSIANS 18 S'MGGANI 28 ACHERNONIANS 9 KRONANS 19 SNEEPERS 29 A-CHILTARIANS 9 KRYLORIANS 43 SOLONS 29 ALPHA CENTAURIANS 10 KT'KN 19 SSSTH 29 ARCTURANS 10 KYMELLIANS 19 stenth 29 ASTRANS 10 LANDLAKS 20 STONIANS 30 AUTOCRONS 11 LAXIDAZIANS 20 TAURIANS 30 axi-tun 45 LEM 20 technarchy 30 BA-BANI 11 LEVIANS 20 TEKTONS 38 BADOON 11 LUMINA 21 THUVRIANS 31 BETANS 11 MAKLUANS 21 TRIBBITES 31 CENTAURIANS 12 MANDOS 43 tribunals 48 CENTURII 12 MEGANS 21 TSILN 31 CIEGRIMITES 41 MEKKANS 21 tsyrani 48 CHR’YLITES 45 mephitisoids 46 UL'LULA'NS 32 CLAVIANS 12 m'ndavians 22 VEGANS 32 CONTRAXIANS 12 MOBIANS 43 vorms 49 COURGA 13 MORANI 36 VRELLNEXIANS 32 DAKKAMITES 13 MYNDAI 22 WILAMEANIS 40 DEONISTS 13 nanda 22 WOBBS 44 DIRE WRAITHS 39 NYMENIANS 44 XANDARIANS 40 DRUFFS 41 OVOIDS 23 XANTAREANS 33 ELAN 13 PEGASUSIANS 23 XANTHA 33 ENTEMEN 14 PHANTOMS 23 Xartans 49 ERGONS 14 PHERAGOTS 44 XERONIANS 33 FLB'DBI 14 plodex 46 XIXIX 33 FOMALHAUTI 14 POPPUPIANS 24 YIRBEK 38 FONABI 15 PROCYONITES 24 YRDS 49 FORTESQUIANS 15 QUEEGA 36 ZENN-LAVIANS 34 FROMA 15 QUISTS 24 Z'NOX 38 GEGKU 39 QUONS 25 ZN'RX (Snarks) 34 GLX 16 rajaks 47 ZUNDAMITES 34 GRAMOSIANS 16 REPTOIDS 25 Races Reference Table 51 GRUNDS 16 Rhunians 25 Blank Alien Race Sheet 54 1 The Universe of Marvel: Spacecraft and Aliens for the Marvel Super Heroes Game By David Edward Martin & Andrew James McFayden With help by TY_STATES , Aunt P and the crowd from www.classicmarvel.com .
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Evolution: Latent Potentials for Anagenetic Advance (Adaptive Shifts/Constraints/Anagenesis) G
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 85, pp. 5141-5145, July 1988 Evolution Comparative evolution: Latent potentials for anagenetic advance (adaptive shifts/constraints/anagenesis) G. LEDYARD STEBBINS* AND DANIEL L. HARTLtt *Department of Genetics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; and tDepartment of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8031, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63110 Contributed by G. Ledyard Stebbins, April 4, 1988 ABSTRACT One of the principles that has emerged from genetic variation available for evolutionary changes (2), a experimental evolutionary studies of microorganisms is that major concern of modem evolutionists is explaining how the polymorphic alleles or new mutations can sometimes possess a vast amount of genetic variation that actually exists can be latent potential to respond to selection in different environ- maintained. Given the fact that in complex higher organisms ments, although the alleles may be functionally equivalent or most new mutations with visible effects on phenotype are disfavored under typical conditions. We suggest that such deleterious, many biologists, particularly Kimura (3), have responses to selection in microorganisms serve as experimental sought to solve the problem by proposing that much genetic models of evolutionary advances that occur over much longer variation is selectively neutral or nearly so, at least at the periods of time in higher organisms. We propose as a general molecular level. Amidst a background of what may be largely evolutionary principle that anagenic advances often come from neutral or nearly neutral genetic variation, adaptive evolution capitalizing on preexisting latent selection potentials in the nevertheless occurs. While much of natural selection at the presence of novel ecological opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • IN EVOLUTION JACK LESTER KING UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA This Paper Is Dedicated to Retiring University of California Professors Curt Stern and Everett R
    THE ROLE OF MUTATION IN EVOLUTION JACK LESTER KING UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA BARBARA This paper is dedicated to retiring University of California Professors Curt Stern and Everett R. Dempster. 1. Introduction Eleven decades of thought and work by Darwinian and neo-Darwinian scientists have produced a sophisticated and detailed structure of evolutionary ,theory and observations. In recent years, new techniques in molecular biology have led to new observations that appear to challenge some of the basic theorems of classical evolutionary theory, precipitating the current crisis in evolutionary thought. Building on morphological and paleontological observations, genetic experimentation, logical arguments, and upon mathematical models requiring simplifying assumptions, neo-Darwinian theorists have been able to make some remarkable predictions, some of which, unfortunately, have proven to be inaccurate. Well-known examples are the prediction that most genes in natural populations must be monomorphic [34], and the calculation that a species could evolve at a maximum rate of the order of one allele substitution per 300 genera- tions [13]. It is now known that a large proportion of gene loci are polymorphic in most species [28], and that evolutionary genetic substitutions occur in the human line, for instance, at a rate of about 50 nucleotide changes per generation [20], [24], [25], [26]. The puzzling observation [21], [40], [46], that homologous proteins in different species evolve at nearly constant rates is very difficult to account for with classical evolutionary theory, and at the very least gives a solid indication that there are qualitative differences between the ways molecules evolve and the ways morphological structures evolve.
    [Show full text]
  • Microevolution and the Genetics of Populations ​ ​ Microevolution Refers to Varieties Within a Given Type
    Chapter 8: Evolution Lesson 8.3: Microevolution and the Genetics of Populations ​ ​ Microevolution refers to varieties within a given type. Change happens within a group, but the descendant is clearly of the same type as the ancestor. This might better be called variation, or adaptation, but the changes are "horizontal" in effect, not "vertical." Such changes might be accomplished by "natural selection," in which a trait ​ ​ ​ ​ within the present variety is selected as the best for a given set of conditions, or accomplished by "artificial selection," such as when dog breeders produce a new breed of dog. Lesson Objectives ● Distinguish what is microevolution and how it affects changes in populations. ● Define gene pool, and explain how to calculate allele frequencies. ● State the Hardy-Weinberg theorem ● Identify the five forces of evolution. Vocabulary ● adaptive radiation ● gene pool ● migration ● allele frequency ● genetic drift ● mutation ● artificial selection ● Hardy-Weinberg theorem ● natural selection ● directional selection ● macroevolution ● population genetics ● disruptive selection ● microevolution ● stabilizing selection ● gene flow Introduction Darwin knew that heritable variations are needed for evolution to occur. However, he knew nothing about Mendel’s laws of genetics. Mendel’s laws were rediscovered in the early 1900s. Only then could scientists fully understand the process of evolution. Microevolution is how individual traits within a population change over time. In order for a population to change, some things must be assumed to be true. In other words, there must be some sort of process happening that causes microevolution. The five ways alleles within a population change over time are natural selection, migration (gene flow), mating, mutations, or genetic drift.
    [Show full text]
  • Fantastic Four Compendium
    MA4 6889 Advanced Game Official Accessory The FANTASTIC FOUR™ Compendium by David E. Martin All Marvel characters and the distinctive likenesses thereof The names of characters used herein are fictitious and do are trademarks of the Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc. not refer to any person living or dead. Any descriptions MARVEL SUPER HEROES and MARVEL SUPER VILLAINS including similarities to persons living or dead are merely co- are trademarks of the Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc. incidental. PRODUCTS OF YOUR IMAGINATION and the ©Copyright 1987 Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc. All TSR logo are trademarks owned by TSR, Inc. Game Design Rights Reserved. Printed in USA. PDF version 1.0, 2000. ©1987 TSR, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Table of Contents Introduction . 2 A Brief History of the FANTASTIC FOUR . 2 The Fantastic Four . 3 Friends of the FF. 11 Races and Organizations . 25 Fiends and Foes . 38 Travel Guide . 76 Vehicles . 93 “From The Beginning Comes the End!” — A Fantastic Four Adventure . 96 Index. 102 This book is protected under the copyright laws of the United States of America. Any reproduction or other unauthorized use of the material or artwork contained herein is prohibited without the express written consent of TSR, Inc., and Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc. Distributed to the book trade in the United States by Random House, Inc., and in Canada by Random House of Canada, Ltd. Distributed to the toy and hobby trade by regional distributors. All characters appearing in this gamebook and the distinctive likenesses thereof are trademarks of the Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc. MARVEL SUPER HEROES and MARVEL SUPER VILLAINS are trademarks of the Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiments on the Role of Deleterious Mutations As Stepping Stones In
    Experiments on the role of deleterious mutations as PNAS PLUS stepping stones in adaptive evolution Arthur W. Covert IIIa,b,c,d, Richard E. Lenskia,c,e,1, Claus O. Wilkec,d, and Charles Ofriaa,b,c,1 aProgram in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology and Behavior, Departments of bComputer Science and Engineering and eMicrobiology and Molecular Genetics, and cBEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824; and dCenter for Computational Biology, Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, and Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712 Contributed by Richard E. Lenski, July 16, 2013 (sent for review April 22, 2013) Many evolutionary studies assume that deleterious mutations spread unless they are tightly linked (5, 6). In an asexual pop- necessarily impede adaptive evolution. However, a later mutation ulation, however, the fortuitous combination, once formed, will that is conditionally beneficial may interact with a deleterious be stably inherited, thereby providing a simple way to traverse a predecessor before it is eliminated, thereby providing access to fitness valley (5–10). adaptations that might otherwise be inaccessible. It is unknown Previous research on a variety of systems, both biological and whether such sign-epistatic recoveries are inconsequential events computational, has documented many examples of epistatic inter- or an important factor in evolution, owing to the difficulty of actions between mutations (3, 6, 11, 14–24), including a few cases monitoring the effects and fates of all mutations during experi- of mutational pairs that are individually deleterious but jointly ments with biological organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Evolution
    An Introduction to Bioinformatics Algorithms www.bioalgorithms.info Molecular Evolution An Introduction to Bioinformatics Algorithms www.bioalgorithms.info Outline • Evolutionary Tree Reconstruction • “Out of Africa” hypothesis • Did we evolve from Neanderthals? • Distance Based Phylogeny • Neighbor Joining Algorithm • Additive Phylogeny • Least Squares Distance Phylogeny • UPGMA • Character Based Phylogeny • Small Parsimony Problem • Fitch and Sankoff Algorithms • Large Parsimony Problem • Evolution of Wings • HIV Evolution • Evolution of Human Repeats An Introduction to Bioinformatics Algorithms www.bioalgorithms.info Early Evolutionary Studies • Anatomical features were the dominant criteria used to derive evolutionary relationships between species since Darwin till early 1960s • The evolutionary relationships derived from these relatively subjective observations were often inconclusive. Some of them were later proved incorrect An Introduction to Bioinformatics Algorithms www.bioalgorithms.info Evolution and DNA Analysis: the Giant Panda Riddle • For roughly 100 years scientists were unable to figure out which family the giant panda belongs to • Giant pandas look like bears but have features that are unusual for bears and typical for raccoons, e.g., they do not hibernate • In 1985, Steven O’Brien and colleagues solved the giant panda classification problem using DNA sequences and algorithms An Introduction to Bioinformatics Algorithms www.bioalgorithms.info Evolutionary Tree of Bears and Raccoons An Introduction to Bioinformatics Algorithms www.bioalgorithms.info Evolutionary Trees: DNA-based Approach • 40 years ago: Emile Zuckerkandl and Linus Pauling brought reconstructing evolutionary relationships with DNA into the spotlight • In the first few years after Zuckerkandl and Pauling proposed using DNA for evolutionary studies, the possibility of reconstructing evolutionary trees by DNA analysis was hotly debated • Now it is a dominant approach to study evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Drift Lab
    Genetic Drift Lab Small population sizes are more strongly influenced by random events than large populations. This means that the genetic frequencies of alleles in small populations are more likely to vary from one generation to the next from the original population. Often, genetic variation is rapidly lost in small populations and random events can create rapid genetic changes or microevolution in such cases. Populations may be subject to this random genetic drift (rapid movement of allele frequencies) by one of two events that reduce population size. 1. Bottlenecks - an incident reduces the overall number of individuals in a population and only a few survive to produce the next generation. Evidence of bottlenecks have been discovered in many species, such as cheetahs and the northern elephant seal. 2. Founder effect - a small number of individuals disperse and colonize new habitat, founding a new population. Organisms colonizing new habitats, such as islands, or migrating to new areas are also common. In both cases the surviving or founding individuals will often vary in genetic frequency from the parental populations (original sources). Also, small subsequent population size plays a big role in additional changes to the gene frequencies. I. Simulation of random events (coin tosses): Each student flips a coin 10 times. What are the expected number of heads for 10 flips? How many heads did you obtain for your 10 flips? _______ # students in your class ___________ # times heads appeared out of 10 trials for all students: 0 _____ 1 ______ 2 _______ 3 ______ 4 ______ 5 ______ 6 _____ 7 _______ 8 ______ 9 ______ 10 ______ How many total times did the replications meet the expected number of heads _______ How many times did the replications not meet this? __________ II.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution
    Copyright 2000 by the Genetics Society of America Perspectives Anecdotal, Historical and Critical Commentaries on Genetics Edited by James F. Crow and William F. Dove Thomas H. Jukes (1906±1999) James F. Crow Genetics Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 OM Jukes accepted our invitation to write a Perspec- duced an immediate outcry from traditional students Ttives on the early history of molecular evolution, of evolution, undoubtedly abetted by the title. In the and in August 1999 he sent a rough beginning con- ensuing polemics, Kimura played the major role. King taining some now-forgotten early history. He planned an died prematurely in 1983 and Jukes wrote mainly about extensive revision and continuation, but on November 1 other things, although he did participate in one joint his death intervened. We have decided to publish his paper (Jukes and Kimura 1984). One of his interests early draft, realizing that it was but a start toward the was the evolution of the genetic code (Jukes 1983). I article that he had planned. particularly liked his showing how, in an orderly sequen- Tom, along with Jack L. King and Motoo Kimura, tial way, mutation pressure in the codon and anti-codon formulated the neutral theory of molecular evolution. could produce the unexpected codes in bacteria and Earlier, the idea had been foreshadowed by Sueoka mitochondria (Jukes 1985). He also developed a widely (1962) and Freese (1962). They had each suggested used correction for multiple undetected changes in evo- mutation pressure of near-neutral changes to account lutionary base substitutions (Jukes and Cantor 1969).
    [Show full text]
  • Population Genetics of Neutral Mutations in Exponentially
    The Annals of Applied Probability 2013, Vol. 23, No. 1, 230–250 DOI: 10.1214/11-AAP824 c Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2013 POPULATION GENETICS OF NEUTRAL MUTATIONS IN EXPONENTIALLY GROWING CANCER CELL POPULATIONS By Rick Durrett1 Duke University In order to analyze data from cancer genome sequencing projects, we need to be able to distinguish causative, or “driver,” mutations from “passenger” mutations that have no selective effect. Toward this end, we prove results concerning the frequency of neutural mutations in exponentially growing multitype branching processes that have been widely used in cancer modeling. Our results yield a simple new population genetics result for the site frequency spectrum of a sample from an exponentially growing population. 1. Introduction. It is widely accepted that cancers result from an accu- mulation of mutations that increase the fitness of tumor cells compared to the cells that surround them. A number of studies [Sj¨oblom et al. (2006), Wood et al. (2007), Parsons et al. (2008), The Cancer Genome Atlas (2008) and Jones et al. (2008, 2010)] have sequenced the genomes of tumors in or- der to find the causative or “driver” mutations. However, due to the large number of genes being sequenced, one also finds a large number of “passen- ger” mutations that are genetically neutral and hence have no role in the disease. To explain the issues involved in distinguishing the two types of mutations, it is useful to take a look at a data set. Wood et al. (2007) did a “discovery” screen in which 18,191 genes were sequenced in 11 colorectal cancers, and then a “validation” screen in which the top candidates were sequenced in 96 additional tumors.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Genetics
    Population Genetics • Study of the distribution of alleles in populations and causes of allele frequency changes Key Concepts • Diploid individuals carry two alleles at every locus Homozygous: alleles are the same Heterozygous: alleles are different • Evolution: change in allele frequencies from one generation to the next Distinguishing Among Sources of Phenotypic Variation in Populations • Discrete vs. continuous • Genotype or environment (nature vs. nurture) • Phenotypic Plasticity (revisited) Phenotypic variation - Discrete vs. Continuous Polygenic Control can create Continuous Variation Phenotypic Variation - Discrete vs. Continuous Quantitative or Continuous or Metric Variation, very often Polygenic Phenotypic variation - genotype or environment? Phenotypic variation - genotype or environment? Mechanisms of Evolutionary Change – “Microevolutionary Processes” • Mutation: Ultimate natural resource of evolution, occurs at the molecular level in DNA. • Natural Selection: A difference, on average, between the survival or fecundity of individuals with certain arrays of phenotypes as compared to individuals with alternative phenotypes. • Migration: The movement of alleles from one population to another, typically by the movement of individuals or via long-range dispersal of gametes. • Genetic Drift: Change in the frequencies of alleles in a population resulting from chance variation in the survival and/or reproductive success of individuals; results in nonadaptive evolution (e.g., bottlenecks). These combined forces affect changes at the level of individuals, populations, and species. What is Population Genetics? • The study of alleles becoming more or less common over time. • Applied Meiosis: Application of Mendel’s Law of segregation of alleles. • Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium Principle: Acts as a null hypothesis for tracking allele and genotype frequencies in a population in the absence of evolutionary forces.
    [Show full text]
  • A Jewish Guide to Marking Transgender Day of Remembrance Contents Introduction
    A Jewish Guide to Marking Transgender Day of Remembrance Contents Introduction .................................................................................................... 3 Readings for Services ...................................................................................... 4 I Am: Trans People Speak ............................................................................... 6 My Jewish Transgender Journey .................................................................. 8 Rabbinical Testimony in Support of the Massachusetts Transgender Equal Rights Bill .............................................13 Sermon ..........................................................................................................20 Text Study: Gender Diversity in Jewish Sacred Texts .................................23 Ways to Take Action in Your Community ....................................................33 it is our role as religious leaders to ensure that our “communities are places where everyone can embrace their whole selves and live up to their divine potential. — R. Joseph Berman ” keshet | 1 | www.keshetonline.org one of the most important teachings in the Jewish tradition “is that every human being is created b’tzelem elohim, “in God’s image,” which is interpreted to mean that every person must be treated with dignity and respect. unfortunately, transgender people have too often been the victims of blatant discrimination and of violence, their humanity and Godliness denied. And as a congregational rabbi, i have had congregants,
    [Show full text]