DOCSLIB.ORG

MACEDONIA Mapping Digital Media: Macedonia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

COUNTRY REPORT MAPPING DIGITAL MEDIA: MACEDONIA Mapping Digital Media: Macedonia A REPORT BY THE OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATIONS WRITTEN BY Roberto Belicanec and Zoran Ricliev (reporters) EDITED BY Marius Dragomir and Mark Thompson (Open Society Media Program editors) EDITORIAL COMMISSION Yuen-Ying Chan, Christian S. Nissen, Dusˇan Reljic´, Russell Southwood, Michael Starks, Damian Tambini The Editorial Commission is an advisory body. Its members are not responsible for the information or assessments contained in the Mapping Digital Media texts OPEN SOCIETY MEDIA PROGRAM TEAM Meijinder Kaur, program assistant; Morris Lipson, senior legal advisor; and Gordana Jankovic, director OPEN SOCIETY INFORMATION PROGRAM TEAM Vera Franz, senior program manager; Darius Cuplinskas, director 5 June 2012 Contents Mapping Digital Media ..................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 6 Context ............................................................................................................................................. 10 Social Indicators ................................................................................................................................ 12 Economic Indicators ......................................................................................................................... 14 1. Media Consumption: Th e Digital Factor ................................................................................... 15 1.1 Digital Take-up ................................................................................................................. 15 1.2 Media Preferences ............................................................................................................. 19 1.3 News Providers ................................................................................................................. 21 1.4 Assessments ...................................................................................................................... 24 2. Digital Media and Public or State-administered Broadcasters .................................................... 26 2.1 Public Service and State Institutions ................................................................................. 26 2.2 Public Service Provision .................................................................................................... 29 2.3 Assessments ..................................................................................................................... 31 3. Digital Media and Society ......................................................................................................... 32 3.1 User-Generated Content (UGC) ...................................................................................... 32 3.2 Digital Activism ................................................................................................................ 36 3.3 Assessments ...................................................................................................................... 40 2 MAPPING DIGITAL MEDIA MACEDONIA 4. Digital Media and Journalism ................................................................................................... 41 4.1 Impact on Journalists and Newsrooms .............................................................................. 41 4.2 Investigative Journalism .................................................................................................... 44 4.3 Social and Cultural Diversity ............................................................................................ 48 4.4 Political Diversity .............................................................................................................. 51 4.5 Assessments ...................................................................................................................... 53 5. Digital Media and Technology .................................................................................................. 55 5.1 Spectrum .......................................................................................................................... 55 5.2 Digital Gatekeeping .......................................................................................................... 58 5.3 Telecommunications ......................................................................................................... 59 5.4 Assessments ...................................................................................................................... 60 6. Digital Business ......................................................................................................................... 61 6.1 Ownership ........................................................................................................................ 61 6.2 Funding ............................................................................................................................ 65 6.3 Media Business Models ..................................................................................................... 67 6.4 Assessments ...................................................................................................................... 67 7. Policies, Laws, and Regulators ................................................................................................... 69 7.1 Policies and Laws .............................................................................................................. 69 7.2 Regulators ......................................................................................................................... 73 7.3 Government Interference .................................................................................................. 77 7.4 Assessments ...................................................................................................................... 79 8. Conclusions .............................................................................................................................. 81 8.1 Media Today ..................................................................................................................... 81 8.2 Media Tomorrow .............................................................................................................. 82 List of Abbreviations, Figures, Tables, and Companies ....................................................................... 84 OPEN SOCIETY MEDIA PROGRAM 2012 3 Mapping Digital Media Th e values that underpin good journalism, the need of citizens for reliable and abundant information, and the importance of such information for a healthy society and a robust democracy: these are perennial, and provide compass-bearings for anyone trying to make sense of current changes across the media landscape. Th e standards in the profession are in the process of being set. Most of the eff ects on journalism imposed by new technology are shaped in the most developed societies, but these changes are equally infl uencing the media in less developed societies. Th e Mapping Digital Media project, which examines the changes in-depth, aims to build bridges between researchers and policymakers, activists, academics and standard-setters across the world. It also builds policy capacity in countries where this is less developed, encouraging stakeholders to participate and infl uence change. At the same time, this research creates a knowledge base, laying foundations for advocacy work, building capacity and enhancing debate. Th e Media Program of the Open Society Foundations has seen how changes and continuity aff ect the media in diff erent places, redefi ning the way they can operate sustainably while staying true to values of pluralism and diversity, transparency and accountability, editorial independence, freedom of expression and information, public service, and high professional standards. Th e Mapping Digital Media project assesses, in the light of these values, the global opportunities and risks that are created for media by the following developments: the switch-over from analog broadcasting to digital broadcasting; growth of new media platforms as sources of news; convergence of traditional broadcasting with telecommunications. Covering 60 countries, the project examines how these changes aff ect the core democratic service that any media system should provide—news about political, economic and social aff airs. 4 MAPPING DIGITAL MEDIA MACEDONIA Th e Mapping Digital Media reports are produced by local researchers and partner organizations in each country. Cumulatively, these reports will provide a much-needed resource on the democratic role of digital media. In addition to the country reports, the Open Society Media Program has commissioned research papers on a range of topics related to digital media. Th ese papers are published as the MDM Reference Series. OPEN SOCIETY MEDIA PROGRAM 2012 5 Mapping Digital Media: Macedonia Executive Summary Th e media in Macedonia have been at the center of acute political instability in recent years, aff ecting the country’s path toward digitization in many ways. When the leading opposition party withdrew from Parliament in 2011, it cited government interference with the media as a primary concern. Th e ruling party was returned to power in the general elections that followed,
Recommended publications
  • History and Development of the Communication Regulatory

    History and Development of the Communication Regulatory

    HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMUNICATION REGULATORY AGENCY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 1998 – 2005 A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Communication of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Adin Sadic March 2006 2 This thesis entitled HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMMUNICATION REGULATORY AGENCY IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 1998 – 2005 by ADIN SADIC has been approved for the School of Telecommunications and the College of Communication by __________________________________________ Gregory Newton Associate Professor of Telecommunications __________________________________________ Gregory Shepherd Interim Dean, College of Communication 3 SADIC, ADIN. M.A. March 2006. Communication Studies History and Development of the Communication Regulatory Agency in Bosnia and Herzegovina 1998 – 2005 (247 pp.) Director of Thesis: Gregory Newton During the war against Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) over 250,000 people were killed, and countless others were injured and lost loved ones. Almost half of the B&H population was forced from their homes. The ethnic map of the country was changed drastically and overall damage was estimated at US $100 billion. Experts agree that misuse of the media was largely responsible for the events that triggered the war and kept it going despite all attempts at peace. This study examines and follows the efforts of the international community to regulate the broadcast media environment in postwar B&H. One of the greatest challenges for the international community in B&H was the elimination of hate language in the media. There was constant resistance from the local ethnocentric political parties in the establishment of the independent media regulatory body and implementation of new standards.
  • Skopje, 2021 ANALYSIS: Media Freedom and Journalists’ Safety in RNM Through the Prism of Existing Legal Solutions – HOW to REACH BETTER SOLUTIONS? IMPRESUM

    Skopje, 2021 ANALYSIS: Media Freedom and Journalists’ Safety in RNM Through the Prism of Existing Legal Solutions – HOW to REACH BETTER SOLUTIONS? IMPRESUM

    BALKAN CIVIL SOCIETY DEVELOPMENT NETWORK Skopje, 2021 ANALYSIS: Media freedom and journalists’ safety in RNM through the prism of existing legal solutions – HOW TO REACH BETTER SOLUTIONS? IMPRESUM Title Analysis: Media freedom and journalists’ safety in RNM through the prism of existing legal solutions – How to reach better solutions? Publisher Association of Journalists of Macedonia Project Promoting dialogue between journalists’ associations and Western Balkan parliaments for stronger civil society sector English translation Kristina Naceva Graphic design Grafotrejd doo Skopje Print Grafotrejd doo Skopje Circulation 25 Disclaimer This document is prepared within the Project “Protecting Civic Space – Regional Civil Society Development Hub” financed by Sida and implemented by BCSDN. The content of this document, and the information and views presented do not represent the official positions and opinions of Sida and BCSDN. Responsibility for the information and views expressed in this document lies entirely with the author(s). Skopje, 2021 CONTENTS 1. Introduction..................................................... 7 2. Criminal Code ................................................... 9 2.1. Ineffective legal solutions and institutional constraints.......10 3. Media regulation – freedom and independence of audiovisual media ...........................................17 3.1. Law on AVMS – state advertising threat to editorial policy.....17 3.2. Violated financial independence is violation of thefreedom of MRT ........................................................19
  • How Public Service Broadcasters in the Western Balkans Interact with Their Audiences

    How Public Service Broadcasters in the Western Balkans Interact with Their Audiences

    Public services without a public? How Public Service Broadcasters in the Western Balkans interact wiTh their audiences ¿Servicios Públicos sin público? Cómo los PSB interactúan con sus audiencias en los Países Balcánicos Occidentales Davor Marko (Analitika, Centre for Social Research, Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina) [[email protected]] http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/IC.2017.i01.08 E-ISSN: 2173-1071 IC – Revista Científica de Información y Comunicación 2017, 14, pp. 217 - 242 Abstract Struggling to cope with structural societal changes, digitalized news production, and the modified habits of fragmented media publics, public service broadcasters are expected to redefine the logic of their operations in order to regain the trust of citizens and engage them. This paper looks at how public service broadcasters in seven countries of the Western Balkans have embraced new approaches, technologies, and online channels to foster interaction with their audiences. This includes the analysis of their structures, the popularity of offline programmes, and the use of online channels to reach the public, on the basis of evidence, experiences and specific findings collected during the period 2014-2016, as part of the project implemented by the University of Fribourg (Switzerland) and the Centre for Social Research Analitika (Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina). Resumen Habitamos un contexto complejo en que los medios requieren (1) abordar cambios sociales significativos en las sociedades, (2) la digitalización de la producción de noticias y (3) las modificaciones en los hábitos de los fragmentarios públicos. En este entorno los medios de servicio público han de redefinir la lógica de su proceder de cara a la recuperación de la confianza entre la ciudadanía, restaurando los vínculos.
  • Regular Programme and Administrative Supervision Conducted Over Sitel TV, Kanal 5 TV, Telma TV, Alsat-M TV and Alfa TV

    Regular Programme and Administrative Supervision Conducted Over Sitel TV, Kanal 5 TV, Telma TV, Alsat-M TV and Alfa TV

    Regular Programme and Administrative Supervision Conducted over Sitel TV, Kanal 5 TV, Telma TV, Alsat-M TV and Alfa TV Skopje, 25 February 2019 – In line with the Annual Supervision Plans for 2019, a regular programme and administrative supervision was conducted over the national television stations of Sitel, Kanal 5, telma, Alsat-M and Alfa. The programme supervision covered the rules for airing audio and audiovisual commercial communications, the rules for providing quizzes, the use of value-added telephone services and televoting, as well as airing lottery games. A violation was detected in the case of Kanal 5 TV, with regard to the rules for airing audio and audiovisual commercial communications and split screen advertising. The administrative supervision covered the obligations to air Impressums, information that should be made available to the users and the obligation to air the broadcaster’s identification sign. Telma TV and Kanal 5 TV were found in violation of the obligation to publish Impressums. The respective supervision reports are available at the links given below: ТV Kanal 5 (violation of Article 14 of the Media Law) – 22.02.2019 ТV Kanal 5 (violation of Article 98, Paragraph 2, of the LAAVMS) – 22.02.2019 ТV Kanal 5 (violation of Article 55, Paragraph 7, of the LAAVMS) – 22.02.2019 ТV Sitel (Article 14 of the Media Law; Article 51, Paragraph 1; Article 97 of the LAAVMS) – 22.02.2019 ТV Sitel (Article 50, Paragraph 3; Articles 52, 53, 54, 55, 93, 94, 98, 99, 101 of the LAAVMS) – 22.02.2019 ТV Telma (violation of Article
  • Politicka Misla 8(Final)

    Politicka Misla 8(Final)

    d-r \orge Ivanov Pred samo dve decenii za mnogu generira elementi na identitet. Na intelektualci religijata i crkvata na{iot prostor religijata imala vo modernoto op{testvo ve}e ne bea izvonredna uloga vo konfigura- nekoja seriozna tema. Za marksis- cijata na pove}ekulturni vrednosti tite i levicata religijata be{e i vrednosni perspektivi, no i na "opium za narod#, a za prosve- sozdavaweto specifi~ni modeli na titelite na liberalno-gra|anskata praktikuvawe na kulturnata plura- {kola na mislewe religijata be{e lnost. ostatok od eden propad- Sega na site nas ni se nat svet ili pak znak za poznati specifi~nos- nedovolna kulturna raz- tite na aktuelniot mo- vienost. Vo eden takov ment, odnosno na epohata ambient istoriskite i vo koja ‘iveeme, iako op{testvenite presvrti istite nastani razli~no vo poslednata decenija gi interpretirame i im na 20. vek gi zatekna mno- davame razli~na te‘ina. zinstvoto analiti~ari Gi poznavame protiv- nepodgotveni. Be{e po- re~nostite koi se pro- trebno cela edna dece- stiraat na globalen nija za da po~nat "fa- plan, te{kite konflik- brikite na mislewa# po- ti koi sekojdnevno se vtorno da go otkrijat pra{aweto za percepirat preku mediumite i koi religijata i nau~nite spisanija da n¢ predupreduvaat na pogubnosta od go prifatat ovoj diskurs. brzoto nosewe zaklu~oci. Ve}e se Posvetuvaweto na ovoj broj na prepoznavaat mnogubrojni kriti~ki Politi~ka misla na pra{awata od diskursi, kako na primer postkolo- religijata, etikata i tolerancijata nijalniot diskurs, koi vnesuvaat voop{to ne pretstavuva posledica novum vo na{ite razmisluvawa i na robuvawe na momentot, ili poinaku ja osvetluvaat proble- projavuvawe na pomodni trendovi.
  • Programme Diversity of the Most Influential TV

    Programme Diversity of the Most Influential TV

    PROGRAMME DIVERSITY OF THE MOST INFLUENTIAL TV-CHANNELS IN MACEDONIA, CROATIA AND SLOVENIA Programme Diversity of the Most Influential TV-Channels in Macedonia, Croatia and Slovenia COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE COMMERCIAL TERRESTRIAL TV-CHANNELS ON NATIONAL LEVEL PROGRAMME DIVERSITY OF THE MOST INFLUENTIAL TV-CHANNELS IN MACEDONIA, CROATIA AND SLOVENIA Authors: Vesna Nikodinoska, Marina Tuneva and Slavco Milenkovski 1. INTRODUCTION The largest commercial terrestrial TV-channels on national level in Macedonia continue to represent a dominant source of information for the audience; hence, they continue to exert the greatest influence on the public opinion. Therefore, on one hand, it imposes expectations that the programme they offer to the viewers should reflect quality and diversity of content, and at the same time, it should set high standards for practitioners working in TV-channels, but on the other hand, they should promote democratic values and professional principles,1 so as to advance the development of the broadcasting industry. The quality of the media content is not an obligation explicitly regulated by law; however, the national commercial TV- channels, as the most viewed and the most influential, are expected to show a sense of social responsibility and work for the public interest, since they themselves are users of public resources. Under free market conditions, the competition with quality content should serve as additional stimulation to the rivalry in the broadcasting area and as “bait” for attracting advertisers. That is
  • Monitoring of Media May 10Th –July 28Th 2011

    Monitoring of Media May 10Th –July 28Th 2011

    NGO INFO-CENTRE MACEDONIAN CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN EDUCATION Monitoring of Media May 10th –July 28th 2011 Who will push forward the European agenda in Macedonia? SKOPJE, October 2011 C O N T E N T S 1. INTRODUCTION 3 2. QUANTITATIVE OVERVIEW 3 3. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 4. ANALYSIS 6 4.1 Fair and Democratic Elections: Appeals and Expectations 6 4.2 EU Agenda in Political Parties’ Campaigns 7 4.3 Orban and the European Right in the Campaign Train 7 4.4 Sorensen Leaves 9 4.5 Visa Regime Returns? 9 4.6 The Name: Issue that can’t be Escaped 10 4.7 Evaluation of Election Process 11 4.8 The Polish Presidency 12 4.9 Diplomatic Activities 13 4.10 Expose 14 4.11 EU Remarks 14 2 Who will push forward the European agenda in Macedonia? 1. Introduction The NGO Info-centre, in cooperation with the Macedonian Centre for European Training (MCET), continues its monitoring of quality of media coverage of the European integration processes in Macedonia in 2011. The monitoring programme is financially supported by the Foundation Open Society Institute Macedonia (FOSIM). This report covers the period from May 10 to July 28, 2011. The analyses includes the coverage in eight daily newspapers (Utrinski vesnik; Dnevnik; Vest; Večer; Vreme; Nova Makedonija, Špic and Koha) and the central news programmes aired on eight TV stations that broadcast nationally and over the satellite (A1 TV; Kanal 5 TV; Sitel TV; Telma TV; MTV 1; Alfa TV; Alsat TV and MTV2). It should be noted that the coverage in Vreme and Špic dailies concluded through July 2, 2011, and for A1 TV the monitoring was concluded on July 19, 2011, the respective dates of their termination.
  • Memorial of the Republic of Croatia

    Memorial of the Republic of Croatia

    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE CASE CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE (CROATIA v. YUGOSLAVIA) MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA ANNEXES REGIONAL FILES VOLUME 2 PART I EASTERN SLAVONIA 1 MARCH 2001 II CONTENTS ETHNIC STRUCTURES 1 Eastern Slavonia 3 Tenja 4 Antin 5 Dalj 6 Berak 7 Bogdanovci 8 Šarengrad 9 Ilok 10 Tompojevci 11 Bapska 12 Tovarnik 13 Sotin 14 Lovas 15 Tordinci 16 Vukovar 17 WITNESS STATEMENTS TENJA 19 Annex 1: Witness Statement of M.K. 21 Annex 2: Witness Statement of R.J. 22 Annex 3: Witness Statement of I.K. (1) 24 Annex 4: Witness Statement of J.P. 29 Annex 5: Witness Statement of L.B. 34 Annex 6: Witness Statement of P.Š. 35 Annex 7: Witness Statement of D.M. 37 Annex 8: Witness Statement of M.R. 39 Annex 9: Witness Statement of M.M. 39 Annex 10: Witness Statement of M.K. 41 Annex 11: Witness Statement of I.I.* 42 Annex 12: Witness Statement of Z.B. 52 Annex 13: Witness Statement of A.M. 54 Annex 14: Witness Statement of J.S. 56 Annex 15: Witness Statement of Z.M. 58 Annex 16: Witness Statement of J.K. 60 IV Annex 17: Witness Statement of L.R. 63 Annex 18: Witness Statement of Đ.B. 64 WITNESS STATEMENTS DALJ 67 Annex 19: Witness Statement of J.P. 69 Annex 20: Witness Statement of I.K. (2) 71 Annex 21: Witness Statement of A.K. 77 Annex 22: Witness Statement of H.S.
  • Indicators on the Level of Media Freedom and Journalists' Safety In

    Indicators on the Level of Media Freedom and Journalists' Safety In

    Indicators on the level of media freedom and journalists’ safety in Macedonia Legal protection of media freedom [ 1 ] Indicators on the level of media freedom and journalists’ safety in Macedonia Authors: Besim Nebiu, Naser Selmani, Dragan Sekulovski, Deniz Sulejman September 2018 Indicators on the level of media freedom and journalists’ safety in Macedonia September 2018 Published by: Association of Journalists of Macedonia Gradski zid blok 13, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia Phone: +389 (0) 2 3298-139 Fax: +389 (0) 2 3116-447 www.znm.org.mk Authors: Besim Nebiu, Naser Selmani, Dragan Sekulovski, Deniz Sulejman Translation in English: Kristina Naceva This publication has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the Independent Journalists’ Association of Serbia and its authors, and can in no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union. [ 4 ] Indicators on the level of media freedom and journalists’ safety in Macedonia Table of Contents Project Goals and Research Methodology .......7 C. Journalists’ security and statistics on impunity .........................33 Summary ...................................8 C.1.1. Attacks against journalists A. Legal protection of media freedom .......... 15 and other threats ...........................34 A.1. Does national law provide guarantees C.1.2. Murder of journalists and cases of media freedom and are they effectively in the last 15-20 years .......................36 implemented in practice? .................... 16 C.1.3. Pressure towards media, A.2. Does laws on libel cause effect of media and guild organizations ...............36 intimidation at journalists? .................... 19 C.2.1. Do state institutions and political actors A.3.
  • SVOD Platforms Carried by Pay TV Operators

    SVOD Platforms Carried by Pay TV Operators

    SVOD platforms carried by pay TV operators Source: Digital TV Research Note: Excludes SVOD platforms owned by pay TV operator Country Pay TV Operator SVOD Platform Argentina Telecentro Netflix Argentina Telecom Argentina Netflix Australia iiNet Netflix Australia Optus Netflix Austria UPC Netflix Azerbaijan Aile TV Megogo Bahrain Batelco Netflix Bahrain Viva Icflix Bahrain Viva Istikana Bahrain Viva Shahid Bahrain Viva Starz Play Bahrain Viva Telly Bahrain Zain Icflix Belgium Belgacom/Proximus Netflix Belgium Telenet Netflix Belgium Voo Canal Play Bolivia Tigo Netflix Bosnia M:tel Pickbox Brazil TIM Netflix Bulgaria Fusion TV Voyo Bulgaria Vivacom Voyo Canada Bell Netflix Canada Cogeco Netflix Canada MTS Netflix Canada Rogers Netflix Canada Telus Optik Netflix Chile VTR Netflix Colombia UNE Netflix Costa Rica Tigo Netflix Croatia T-HT Oyo Croatia T-HT Pickbox Croatia Vipnet Oyo Czech Rep T-Mobile Voyo Czech Rep UPC Netflix Denmark TDC HBO Denmark Telia HBO Denmark Waoo Netflix Denmark Waoo Viaplay Denmark YouSee HBO Egypt Telecom Egypt Icflix Egypt Vodafone Starz Play El Salvador Tigo Netflix Estonia Elion Netflix SVOD platforms carried by pay TV operators Source: Digital TV Research Note: Excludes SVOD platforms owned by pay TV operator Finland DNA C More Finland Elisa HBO Finland Elisa Netflix Finland Telia C More Finland Telia HBO Finland Telia Netflix France Bouygues Telecom Netflix France Free Canal Play France Free Filmo France Numericable Filmo France Orange Filmo France Orange Netflix France SFR Netflix Germany Deutsche Telekom
  • English and INTRODACTION

    English and INTRODACTION

    CHANGES AND CONTINUITY IN EVERYDAY LIFE IN ALBANIA, BULGARIA AND MACEDONIA 1945-2000 UNDERSTANDING A SHARED PAST LEARNING FOR THE FUTURE 1 This Teacher Resource Book has been published in the framework of the Stability Pact for South East Europe CONTENTS with financial support from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It is available in Albanian, Bulgarian, English and INTRODACTION..............................................3 Macedonian language. POLITICAL LIFE...........................................17 CONSTITUTION.....................................................20 Title: Changes and Continuity in everyday life in Albania, ELECTIONS...........................................................39 Bulgaria and Macedonia POLITICAL PERSONS..............................................50 HUMAN RIGHTS....................................................65 Author’s team: Terms.................................................................91 ALBANIA: Chronology........................................................92 Adrian Papajani, Fatmiroshe Xhemali (coordinators), Agron Nishku, Bedri Kola, Liljana Guga, Marie Brozi. Biographies........................................................96 BULGARIA: Bibliography.......................................................98 Rumyana Kusheva, Milena Platnikova (coordinators), Teaching approches..........................................101 Bistra Stoimenova, Tatyana Tzvetkova,Violeta Stoycheva. ECONOMIC LIFE........................................103 MACEDONIA: CHANGES IN PROPERTY.......................................104
  • EHO93 Layout 1

    EHO93 Layout 1

    ^itajte ne i na internet i tamu sme besplatni skopskoeho.mk br. 93 15.11.2018 BRZOTO KUMSTVO, POPULARNO I NA LOKALNO NIVO Zarem na ulici po tri imiwa }e im Na porane{noto smenat, a dupkite „Vardari{te“ |ubreto i natamu se trupa, a neli isti }e ostanat? treba{e park da bide? Skopje treba da ima nekolku centri, osmisleni na eden sofisticiran na~in Dodeka Naumovski i Smilevski zboruvaat za trotoari gra|anite baraat seriozni proekti 2 VO FOKUSOT Partizanite ne oslobodija od fa{izmot, a nie kako da gi zaboravame Gorda istorija e toa! No, se se}ava li dene{no Skopje dovolno na ovie istoriski migovi? Se oddava li dovolno priznanie na toga{nite borci i ja neguvaat li skopjani taa tradicija i svetla istorija? Na ova treba site da dademe odgovor, i instituciite, i u~ili{tata, i roditelite kopje go odbele`a svoeto oslo- na parada na koja u~estvuvale oslo - Sboduvawe od fa{izmot i oku- bo ditelite. pacijata. Za mnogumina skopjani toa Gorda istorija e toa! No, se se}a va ne ma{e nitu da bide poznato, da ne li dene{no Skopje dovolno na ovie ima{e po nekoe zname na bande ri- istoriski migovi? Se oddava li do- te. Za `al od godina vo godina slav- volno priznanie na toga{nite borci ni ot den i negovata proslava se i ja ~uvaat li skopjani taa tradicija i po ve}e blednee. svetla istorija? Na ova treba site da Inaku, na 13 noemvri 1944-tata si dademe odgovor, i instituciite i go dina, makedonskite partizani po- u~ili{tata i rodi te lite.