The Persian, Ptolemaic, and Seleucid Administrative Center at Tel Kedesh, Israel, in a Regional Context

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Persian, Ptolemaic, and Seleucid Administrative Center at Tel Kedesh, Israel, in a Regional Context ‘PROVINCIAL’ PERSPECTIVES: THE PERSIAN, PTOLEMAIC, AND SELEUCID ADMINISTRATIVE CENTER AT TEL KEDESH, ISRAEL, IN A REGIONAL CONTEXT A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy in the Department of Classics of the College of Arts and Sciences by Peter James Stone March, 2012 B.A. University of Minnesota, 2004 M.A. University of Cincinnati, 2007 Committee Chair: Kathleen M. Lynch, Ph.D. iii ABSTRACT In this dissertation I explore how people in the eastern Mediterranean responded to imperial rule under the Achaemenid Persians (539-331 BCE) and Alexander the Great and his Greco-Macedonian successors, the Ptolemies (c. 300-201 BCE) and Seleucids (c. 201-104 BCE). To get an intimate perspective on these responses, I approach them through the recently excavated Persian and Hellenistic Administrative building (hereafter PHAB) at Tel Kedesh in the Upper Galilee of modern day Israel. The PHAB was in use under the Persians, the Ptolemies, and the Seleucids before being abandoned after the Seleucids were defeated in a nearby battle against a Judean army led by Jonathan Maccabee in 143 BCE. People moved north from the Central Hills a few years after this battle and inhabited the site of the semi-ruined building as squatters for a generation. From the vantage of the PHAB, it is possible to consider how economies and lifestyles changed against the dramatic historical backdrop of Alexander’s conquest of the Persian Empire, the five Syrian Wars fought between his Ptolemaic and Seleucid successors over the southern Levant in the 3rd century, and the Maccabean Revolt against Seleucid rule in the mid 2nd century. In this dissertation I consider the largest body of evidence for economic and cultural interconnections of the staff of the PHAB, the pottery, in a regional context in order to characterize the daily habits and tastes of the administrators and squatters who lived at Kedesh. By considering changes in these tastes and habits over time as regimes and borders shifted, I show that people responded to the limitations and opportunities presented by Persian, Ptolemaic, and Seleucid rule (and its aftermath) in thoroughly local ways and at different paces according to political circumstances, economic opportunity, and their own sense of taste and tradition. iv ©2012 Peter James Stone v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The debt of gratitude that I owe to my colleagues, advisors, friends, and family for their assistance, advice, and support cannot be quantified or described coherently. I will here list the names of those people and institutions to whom I am most indebted for the completion of this dissertation. I have enjoyed the generous support of a Louise Taft Semple Fellowship from the Department of Classics at the University of Cincinnati and a University Graduate Scholarship since the fall of 2004. From 2004 to 2007, this funding allowed me to focus on classes that sharpened my research, writing and presentation skills, and since 2008 on the research and writing of this dissertation. Over this span, I have received assistance regarding a host of administrative matters from Gayle McGarrahan, Laura Deller, Deema Maghathe, and Kenneth Gottorff. The cheerful and capable staff of the Burnam Classics Library: Phoebe Acheson, the late David Ball, Mike Braunlin, and Jacquelene Riley have made it possible for me to make the most of a unique and vast collection of materials. Assembling the data for this dissertation and illustrating it required confidence in technology and my ability to use it. Thanks to the tutelage of John Wallrodt and his reassuring presence in the department, I have had no need to worry on either front. The archaeology graduate directors while I have been here, Jack Davis, Gisela Walberg, and Kathleen Lynch, deserve praise for clearly communicating the expectations and requirements of the program and making us aware of opportunities in the field. I was fortunate to participate in courses and lively seminars at the University of Cincinnati that broadened my knowledge of the ancient world as it deepened my understanding of how and why we study the past. I have been enriched by courses with vi Susan Allen, Barbara Burrell, Tom Carpenter, Getzel Cohen, Jack Davis, Eleni Hatzaki, William Johnson, Kathleen Lynch, Peter van Minnen, Holt Parker, and Gisela Walberg. I thank all of them for the time and careful thought that they invested in my development as a scholar and teacher. In the same vein I would like to thank Kathryn Gutzwiller for discussing the literary culture and aesthetic sensibilities of the Hellenistic world with me, Susan Prince for hosting a series of pedagogy lunches, and Alan Sullivan for sharing his thoughts on Classics from the point of view of an anthropologist. Sharon Herbert and Andrea Berlin gave me permission to work on the Persian and Hellenistic pottery from their extremely well run excavations at Tel Kedesh in Israel. When I began research at Kedesh in 2008, four seasons of excavation had taken place, but there was no backlog because Andrea Berlin conducted pottery readings in 1997, 1999, and 2000 and Nicholas Hudson did in 2006. I thank both of them for working diligently on this material. Moreover, when I arrived at Kedesh I found in place a system that ensured the pottery remained part of the stratigraphic record from its time of excavation until the assignment of stratigraphic loci at the end of each season. This system would not have worked without the dedication of the trench supervisors at Kedesh. The author of this system, Sharon Herbert, deserves credit too. Her commitment to the marriage of stratigraphy and pottery has made the formidable task of interpreting this huge corpus of pottery much more practical and pleasurable. I was blessed in the spring and summer of 2010 with the capable assistance and good company of Andrew Boos and Caitlin Clerkin for the final quantification of the pottery from Kedesh. They made long hours at the sorting tables much less arduous and were a sounding board for ideas I had about the pottery. Without the efforts of Linda Clougherty and Meg Morden vii in the registry, Suzanne Davis, Claudia Chemello, and Meghan McFarlane in conservation, the illustrators Darin Anderson, Fritz McBride, Hannah Schnobrich, and Lorene Sterner, and the photographer Sue Webb, I would literally have little to show for my efforts. My understanding of the pottery from Kedesh and its archaeological context benefited greatly from conversations in the 2008-2010 seasons and afterwards with Bjorn Anderson, Donald Ariel, Andrea Berlin, Lisa Cakmak, Henry Colburn, Suzanne Davis, Ameera Elrasheedy, Gerald Finkielsztejn, Sharon Herbert, Tom Landvatter, Kate Larson, Paul Lesperance, Lindy Lindorfer, Charlotte Maxwell-Jones, Fritz McBride, Leah Minc, Meg Morden, Adrian Ossi, Anastasia Shapiro, and Justin Winger. Collaborations with other scholars have helped me understand the material from Kedesh and how to work with it. Before I began work at Kedesh in 2008, I had the opportunity to work on pottery from the University of British Columbia excavations at Stymphalos and the Sikyon Survey Project in Greece. This experience helped me put the Persian and Hellenistic pottery from Kedesh and other eastern Mediterranean sites into broader perspective. I thank the directors of those projects: Hector Williams and Yannis A. Lolos as well as Ben Gourley, Matt Maher, Erika Nitsch, Leticia Rodriguez-Hinojosa, Gerald Schaus, Daniel Richard Stewart, Conor Trainor, and Elli Tzavella for camaraderie and productive conversations. In the summer of 2008, when I was just beginning work on the pottery at Kedesh, Andrea Berlin enlisted my help in publishing pottery from Hellenistic and early Roman Akko. I thank her and Danny Syon, Moshe Hartal, and Eliezer Stern, the directors of the project, for making this material available. In the fall of 2010 Søren Handberg invited me to join Jane Hjarl-Petersen in writing an article on the unusual distribution of Hellenistic Italian finewares in the eastern Mediterranean. Work viii on this article led me to a clearer view of the economic and social interconnections of the people who lived at Kedesh that has proved valuable in this dissertation. These collaborations have sharpened my skills as a researcher and all have been personally rewarding. In 2009, the United States Department of State awarded me an Educational and Cultural Affairs Grant to conduct research at the Albright Institute of Archaeological Research in east Jerusalem. Thanks to the staff of the Albright, and in particular Helena Flusfeder and Sy Gitin, its director, this was a period of almost unparalleled scholarly productivity for me. Sy and Helena helped me arrange visits to the Israel Antiquities storerooms at Beit Shemesh and put me in contact with scholars working on Persian and Hellenistic sites throughout Israel. I offer thanks to Yardenna Alexandre, Nourit Feig, Moshe Fischer, Rafael Frankel, Moshe Hartal, Malka Hershkovitz, Yo’av Lehrer, Barak Monnikendam-Givon, Yiftah Shalev, Howard Smithline, Danny Syon, and Oren Tal for taking the time to show me material from their projects and discussing it with me. It would have been hard to make many of these meetings without the use of Sharon Herbert’s Renault. I thank her for letting me use it and making sure that it was registered. I also owe a debt of gratitude to Marie Henriette-Gates for allowing me to view pottery from her excavations at Kinet Höyük in Turkey, and Gisela Walberg for giving me the opportunity to study the Hellenistic pottery from her excavations at Episkopi-Bamboula in Cyprus. My advisors: Andrea Berlin and Kathleen Lynch, and committee members: Getzel Cohen, Eleni Hatzaki, and Sharon Herbert have read and commented on this dissertation with great care. They each deserve more than a word of thanks here.
Recommended publications
  • A Geometric Cemetery on the Areopagus: 1897, 1932, 1947*
    A GEOMETRIC CEMETERY ON THE AREOPAGUS: 1897, 1932, 1947* with Appendices on the Geometric Graves found in the Dorpfeld Excavations on the Acropolis West Slope in 1895 and on Hadrian Street ("Phinopoulos' Lot") in 1898 (PLATES 65-80) I. Introduction and the Problem a. The D6rpfeld Excavations p. 325 b. The Agora Excavations and the Search p. 327 c. Disiecta Membra p. 328 II. The Areopagus Cemetery a. General Remarks and Conclusions p. 329 b. Catalogue of Graves and Finds p. 334 Appendix A: Sources for the D6rpfeld Geometric Graves p. 365 Appendix B: The Two Geometric Graves on the Acropolis West Slope: 1895 p. 372 Appendix C: Two Geometric Graves in Phinopoulos' Lot at No. 3, Hadrian Street: 1898 p. 374 Appendix D: A Note on Poulsen's "Akropolisvasen" p. 385 Appendix E: List of Known Finds from the D6rpfeld Geometric Graves p. 387 Appendix F: The Submycenaean Child's Grave South of the Amyneion: 1892 p. 389 I. INTRODUCTION AND THE PROBLEM' A. THE DORPFELD EXCAVATIONS For seven seasons between 1892 and 1899 the German Archaeological Institute, under the general supervision of Wilhelm Dorpfeld, carried out regular excavations in * Professor Penuel P. Kahane died suddenly on February 13, 1974 in Basel. This paper is dedicated to his memory. 1 I am deeply grateful to Professor Homer A. Thompson and to the American School of Classical Studies for the opportunity to study the Agora material; to the German Archaeological Institute in Athens and to Professor Emil Kunze for permission to use the Daybook material; to Dr. Ulf Jantzen for permission to publish the vases in the Institute, and to reproduce the photographs from the Photoabteilung; and to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Around the Sea of Galilee (5) the Mystery of Bethsaida
    136 The Testimony, April 2003 to shake at the presence of the Lord. Ezekiel that I am the LORD” (v. 23). May this time soon concludes by saying: “Thus will I magnify My- come when the earth will be filled with the self, and sanctify Myself; and I will be known in knowledge of the glory of the Lord and when all the eyes of many nations, and they shall know nations go to worship the King in Jerusalem. Around the Sea of Galilee 5. The mystery of Bethsaida Tony Benson FTER CAPERNAUM, Bethsaida is men- according to Josephus it was built by the tetrarch tioned more times in the Gospels than Philip, son of Herod the Great, and brother of A any other of the towns which lined the Herod Antipas the tetrarch of Galilee. Philip ruled Sea of Galilee. Yet there are difficulties involved. territories known as Iturea and Trachonitis (Lk. From secular history it is known that in New 3:1). Testament times there was a city called Bethsaida Luke’s account of the feeding of the five thou- Julias on the north side of the Sea of Galilee, but sand begins: “And he [Jesus] took them [the apos- is this the Bethsaida of the Gospels? Some of the tles], and went aside privately into a desert place references to Bethsaida seem to refer to a town belonging to the city called Bethsaida” (9:10). on the west side of the lake. A tel called et-Tell 1 The twelve disciples had just come back from is currently being excavated over a mile north of their preaching mission and Jesus wanted to the Sea of Galilee, and is claimed to be the site of be able to have a quiet talk with them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Herodotos Project (OSU-Ugent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography
    Faculty of Literature and Philosophy Julie Boeten The Herodotos Project (OSU-UGent): Studies in Ancient Ethnography Barbarians in Strabo’s ‘Geography’ (Abii-Ionians) With a case-study: the Cappadocians Master thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Linguistics and Literature, Greek and Latin. 2015 Promotor: Prof. Dr. Mark Janse UGent Department of Greek Linguistics Co-Promotores: Prof. Brian Joseph Ohio State University Dr. Christopher Brown Ohio State University ACKNOWLEDGMENT In this acknowledgment I would like to thank everybody who has in some way been a part of this master thesis. First and foremost I want to thank my promotor Prof. Janse for giving me the opportunity to write my thesis in the context of the Herodotos Project, and for giving me suggestions and answering my questions. I am also grateful to Prof. Joseph and Dr. Brown, who have given Anke and me the chance to be a part of the Herodotos Project and who have consented into being our co- promotores. On a whole other level I wish to express my thanks to my parents, without whom I would not have been able to study at all. They have also supported me throughout the writing process and have read parts of the draft. Finally, I would also like to thank Kenneth, for being there for me and for correcting some passages of the thesis. Julie Boeten NEDERLANDSE SAMENVATTING Deze scriptie is geschreven in het kader van het Herodotos Project, een onderneming van de Ohio State University in samenwerking met UGent. De doelstelling van het project is het aanleggen van een databank met alle volkeren die gekend waren in de oudheid.
    [Show full text]
  • Mortem Et Gloriam Army Lists Use the Army Lists to Create Your Own Customised Armies Using the Mortem Et Gloriam Army Builder
    Army Lists Syria and Asia Minor Contents Asiatic Greek 670 to 129 BCE Lycian 525 to 300 BCE Bithynian 434 to 74 BCE Armenian 330 BCE to 627 CE Asiatic Successor 323 to 280 BCE Cappadocian 300 BCE to 17 CE Attalid Pergamene 282 to 129 BCE Galatian 280 to 62 BCE Early Seleucid 279 to 167 BCE Seleucid 166 to 129 BCE Commagene 163 BCE to 72 CE Late Seleucid 128 to 56 BCE Pontic 110 to 47 BCE Palmyran 258 CE to 273 CE Version 2020.02: 1st January 2020 © Simon Hall Creating an army with the Mortem et Gloriam Army Lists Use the army lists to create your own customised armies using the Mortem et Gloriam Army Builder. There are few general rules to follow: 1. An army must have at least 2 generals and can have no more than 4. 2. You must take at least the minimum of any troops noted and may not go beyond the maximum of any. 3. No army may have more than two generals who are Talented or better. 4. Unless specified otherwise, all elements in a UG must be classified identically. Unless specified otherwise, if an optional characteristic is taken, it must be taken by all the elements in the UG for which that optional characteristic is available. 5. Any UGs can be downgraded by one quality grade and/or by one shooting skill representing less strong, tired or understrength troops. If any bases are downgraded all in the UG must be downgraded. So Average-Experienced skirmishers can always be downgraded to Poor-Unskilled.
    [Show full text]
  • Banchetele Tracilor Ca Expresie a Contactelor Interculturale
    Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai, Historia Volume 59, Number 1, June 2014 Banquets of Gods, Banquets of Men. Conviviality in the Ancient World I. Archaeology 1 JOHN BAINES Not only with the dead: banqueting in ancient Egypt 35 FLORIN GOGÂLTAN Drinking with the gods? The problem of Bronze Age pot deposits in Transylvania 83 DRAGOŞ MNDESCU The banquets of Thracians as an expression of intercultural contacts. A quick glance through the strainer's holes 96 FRANCK PERRIN Des coupes-crânes chez les anciens Celtes ? 106 GELU FLOREA Quel type de festin en Dacie, à la fin de l’âge du Fer? Ustensiles à servir la viande 115 CTLIN CRISTESCU Feasting with the king. The tableware of Sarmizegetusa Regia 153 MARIANA EGRI, AUREL RUSTOIU Sacred conviviality in the Lower Danube region. The case of the Sâncrieni hoard 189 MANUEL FIEDLER Bankette für Liber Pater in Apulum 204 CONSTANZE HÖPKEN Ein Bankett für Sabazios in Straubing ii Cuprins 215 SILVIA MUSTA, SZILÁMÉR-PÉTER PÁNCZEL, DÁVID PETRU, KATALIN SIDÓ Drinking and gaming in the Roman fort of Porolissum. Preliminary data offered by the excavation at building C3 239 VIORICA RUSU BOLINDE Pottery in funerary contexts – some aspects of conviviality in Roman Dacia II. History and epigraphy 285 JUAN RAMÓN CARBÓ GARCÍA Perspectives on the phenomenon of ritual sacrifice, sacralization of food and conviviality in the Classical world 308 ANGUS BOWIE Krater and kratos: the politics of Greek dining 322 GYÖRGY NÉMETH Two banquets of Socrates 334 VICTOR COJOCARU Ladung zu Opfer und Bankett als Auszeichnung der Fremde im pontischen Raum und der Pontikoi in der Fremde 345 MADALINA DANA « Le banquet des sophistes » : représentation funéraire, représentation sociale sur les stèles de Byzance aux époques hellénistique et impériale 372 LIVIO ZERBINI Le banquet en tant que forme de sociabilité et l’évergétisme romain 380 FRITZ MITTHOF Epulum dedit: Öffentliche Bankette in den lateinischen Inschriften Cuprins iii 391 IRINA NEMETI, SORIN NEMETI I banchetti religiosi nella Dacia romana.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT the Apostolic Tradition in the Ecclesiastical Histories Of
    ABSTRACT The Apostolic Tradition in the Ecclesiastical Histories of Socrates, Sozomen, and Theodoret Scott A. Rushing, Ph.D. Mentor: Daniel H. Williams, Ph.D. This dissertation analyzes the transposition of the apostolic tradition in the fifth-century ecclesiastical histories of Socrates, Sozomen, and Theodoret. In the early patristic era, the apostolic tradition was defined as the transmission of the apostles’ teachings through the forms of Scripture, the rule of faith, and episcopal succession. Early Christians, e.g., Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Origen, believed that these channels preserved the original apostolic doctrines, and that the Church had faithfully handed them to successive generations. The Greek historians located the quintessence of the apostolic tradition through these traditional channels. However, the content of the tradition became transposed as a result of three historical movements during the fourth century: (1) Constantine inaugurated an era of Christian emperors, (2) the Council of Nicaea promulgated a creed in 325 A.D., and (3) monasticism emerged as a counter-cultural movement. Due to the confluence of these sweeping historical developments, the historians assumed the Nicene creed, the monastics, and Christian emperors into their taxonomy of the apostolic tradition. For reasons that crystallize long after Nicaea, the historians concluded that pro-Nicene theology epitomized the apostolic message. They accepted the introduction of new vocabulary, e.g. homoousios, as the standard of orthodoxy. In addition, the historians commended the pro- Nicene monastics and emperors as orthodox exemplars responsible for defending the apostolic tradition against the attacks of heretical enemies. The second chapter of this dissertation surveys the development of the apostolic tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Defence Sites on the Danube River and Environmental Changes
    Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Heritage Architecture XIII 563 Roman defence sites on the Danube River and environmental changes D. Constantinescu Faculty Material’s Science and Engineering, University Politehnica of Bucharest, Romania Abstract There are many things to learn from the past regarding ancient settlements, the ancient organization of cities, the structures of the buildings and concerning the everyday life of our ancestors. There are numerous sites along the Danube River which were once included in the economic and defensive system of the Roman Empire. Many of them are not well known today or studies are in their very early stages. Sucidava is an example of a Daco-Roman historical defence site, situated on the north bank of the Danube. The ancient heritage site covers more than two hectares; comprising the Roman-Byzantine basilica of the 4th century, the oldest place of worship north of the Danube, the building containing the hypocaust dates from the late 6th century AD, Constantine the Great portal bridge, to span the Danube river, the gates linking the bridge and city, a Roman fountain dating from the 2nd century AD. This entire defensive and communication system stands as a testimony to the complexity of an historical conception. However, how was it possible that such sophisticated structures have been partially or totally destroyed? Certainly not only economic and military aspects might be a likely explanation. The present article considers the evolution of the sites from cultural ecology point of view, as well as taking into consideration environmental and climatic changes. Doubtless, the overall evolution of this site is not singular.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Culinary Heritage of Levantine Cuisine
    Discover Culinary Heritage of Levantine Cuisine Small plates of delicious Levantine Classics perfect for sharing. We recommend 2 to 3 Mezzeh per person COLD MEZZEH HOT MEZZEH Jat Khudra Crudites (V) 36 Falafel, Tahina Sauce (V) 36 Selection of seasonal vegetables Chickpeas and mixed vegetables, tahini sauce Assorted Arabic Pickles (V) 36 Batata Harra (V) 36 Marinated Lebanese pickles, Fried potatoes, garlic, coriander Muahammara (V) (N) 36 Cheese Rakakat (V) 38 Red Chili, nuts, olive oil Akawi cheese wrapped in filo pastry Marinated Chickpeas (V) 36 Meat Kibbeh (N) 38 Boiled chickpeas, coriander, olive oil Fried beef dumplings, pine nuts Hummus (V) 38 Meat Sambousek (N) 38 Boiled chickpeas puree, tahini sauce, lemon Tender crust pastry filled with minced lamb, pine seeds Moutabel (V) (N) 38 SpinacH Fattayer (V) 36 Grilled eggplants, tahini sauce, pomegranate Pastry triangle filled with spinach and onion Moutabel Carrot (V)(N) 38 Hummus Bil Lahma (N) 45 Boiled carrot, tahini sauce Classic hummus with minced lamb, pine seeds Moutabel Beetroot (V)(N) 38 Lamb Makanek (N) 45 Boiled beetroot, tahini sauce Lamb sausages, tomato sauce, lemon juice Balady Salad (V) 38 Vegetables Soup (V) 36 Egyptian mixed salad, olive oil, lemon Mixed vegetables, beans, coriander Babaganoush (V) 38 Shorbat Adas (V) 40 Grilled eggplants, onions, tomatoes, parsley, mint Purée of red lentils, onion, garlic, condiments Fattoush (V) 38 DISH OF THE DAY 75 Cucumbers, tomatoes, herbs, pomegranate dressing, Arabic bread Tabouleh (V) 38 SWEET FINISH Finely chopped parsley,
    [Show full text]
  • A Christian's Map of the Holy Land
    A CHRISTIAN'S MAP OF THE HOLY LAND Sidon N ia ic n e o Zarefath h P (Sarepta) n R E i I T U A y r t s i Mt. of Lebanon n i Mt. of Antilebanon Mt. M y Hermon ’ Beaufort n s a u b s s LEGEND e J A IJON a H Kal'at S Towns visited by Jesus as I L e o n Nain t e s Nimrud mentioned in the Gospels Caesarea I C Philippi (Banias, Paneas) Old Towns New Towns ABEL BETH DAN I MA’ACHA T Tyre A B a n Ruins Fortress/Castle I N i a s Lake Je KANAH Journeys of Jesus E s Pjlaia E u N s ’ Ancient Road HADDERY TYRE M O i REHOB n S (ROSH HANIKRA) A i KUNEITRA s Bar'am t r H y s u Towns visited by Jesus MISREPOTH in K Kedesh sc MAIM Ph a Sidon P oe Merom am n HAZOR D Tyre ic o U N ACHZIV ia BET HANOTH t Caesarea Philippi d a o Bethsaida Julias GISCALA HAROSH A R Capernaum an A om Tabgha E R G Magdala Shave ACHSAPH E SAFED Zion n Cana E L a Nazareth I RAMAH d r Nain L Chorazin o J Bethsaida Bethabara N Mt. of Beatitudes A Julias Shechem (Jacob’s Well) ACRE GOLAN Bethany (Mt. of Olives) PISE GENES VENISE AMALFI (Akko) G Capernaum A CABUL Bethany (Jordan) Tabgha Ephraim Jotapata (Heptapegon) Gergesa (Kursi) Jericho R 70 A.D. Magdala Jerusalem HAIFA 1187 Emmaus HIPPOS (Susita) Horns of Hittin Bethlehem K TIBERIAS R i Arbel APHEK s Gamala h Sea of o Atlit n TARICHAFA Galilee SEPPHORIS Castle pelerin Y a r m u k E Bet Tsippori Cana Shearim Yezreel Valley Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology in the Holy Land IRON AGE I
    AR 342/742: Archaeology in the Holy Land IRON AGE I: Manifest Identities READING: Elizabeth Bloch-Smith and Beth Alpert Nahkhai, "A Landscape Comes to Life: The Iron Age I, " Near Eastern Archaeology 62.2 (1999), pp. 62-92, 101-27; Elizabeth Bloch-Smith, "Israelite Ethnicity in Iron I: Archaeology Preserves What is Remembered and What is Forgotten in Israel's History," Journal of Biblical Literature 122/3 (2003), pp. 401-25. Wed. Sept. 7th Background: The Territory and the Neighborhood Fri. Sept. 9th The Egyptian New Kingdom Mon. Sept. 12th The Canaanites: Dan, Megiddo, & Lachish Wed. Sept. 14th The Philistines, part 1: Tel Miqne/Ekron & Ashkelon Fri. Sept. 16th The Philistines, part 2: Tel Qasile and Dor Mon. Sept. 19th The Israelites, part 1: 'Izbet Sartah Wed. Sept. 21st The Israelites, part 2: Mt. Ebal and the Bull Site Fri. Sept. 23rd Discussion day & short paper #1 due IRON AGE II: Nations and Narratives READING: Larry Herr, "The Iron Age II Period: Emerging Nations," Biblical Archaeologist 60.3 (1997), pp. 114-83; Seymour Gitin, "The Philistines: Neighbors of the Canaanites, Phoenicians, and Israelites," 100 Years of American Archaeology in the Middle East, D. R. Clark and V. H. Matthews, eds. (American Schools of Oriental Research, Boston: 2004), pp. 57-85; Judges 13:24-16:31; Steven Weitzman, "The Samson Story as Border Fiction," Biblical Interpretation 10,2 (2002), pp. 158-74; Azzan Yadin, "Goliath's Armor and Israelite Collective Memory," Vetus Testamentum 54.3 (2004), pp. 373-95. Mon. Sept. 26th The 10th century, part 1: Hazor and Gezer Wed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sarc O P Hagu S F Rom T H E Family of Herodes Atticus
    HESPERIA 70 (200I) ICONOG RAPHY Pages46z-492 AND THE DYNAMIGS O F PATRO NAG E A SARCO P HAGU S FROM T H E FAMILYOF HERODESATTICUS ABSTRACT A sarcophagusfiom the estateof HerodesAtticus in Kephisiacommemo- ratesthe intimate connections ofthe familywiththe cityof Sparta,the Battle of Marathon,and the cultstatue of Nemesisat Rhamnous.Theiconographic allusionsto Marathonalso reflect the prioritiesof the SecondSophistic, an intellectualmovement that appealed to the pastto establishcultural and po- liticalsuperiority. The unusualand meaningfill decorative program suggests thatthe family commissioned this sarcophagus. The earlierview that the more unusualAttic sarcophagiwere prefabricated, but that theirthemes simply provedunpopular, should be modifiedin lightof this study. INTRODUCTION In Septemberof 1866,during the construction of a housein the Kephisia suburbof Athens,workers discovered a marbleburial chamber, roughly squarein plan.1Robbers had long since plundered the chamber, removing thedeceased and most ofthe portable possessions. In 1866,the significant remainingartifacts included four carved marble sarcophagi and only a handfillof smallobjects.2 Otto Benndorf,who wrotethe firstcomplete descriptionof the chamberand its contents,was also the firstto suggest 1. I thankthe Universityof Mich- andNeel Smithfor discussing with me this study,still stand in the tomb iganfor support that allowed me to someof the ideaspresented here. Photo- today.Cramped space in the tomb undertakepreliminary research in graphswere kindly provided byJan San- makesit difficultto providea complete Athensfor this article;and the College ders;the BritishMuseum; the Deutsches photographicrecord. I thereforerefer of the Holy Crossboth for funds to ArchaologischesInstitut, Rome; the in manyinstances to the line drawings purchasephotographs and for a leaveof GreekArchaeological Service; and the of the Ledasarcophagus produced by absencethat allowed me to continue KunsthistorischesMuseum, Vienna.
    [Show full text]
  • LE ZYRIAB by NOURA - the LEBANESE CUISINE Tracing Back to Thousands of Years
    Beat: Lifestyle LE ZYRIAB BY NOURA - The LEBANESE CUISINE Tracing Back To Thousands Of Years Since 2008, ARAB WORLD INSTITUTE, Paris PARIS - BEIRUT, 06.05.2018, 10:01 Time USPA NEWS - The Lebanese Cuisine is an Ancient one and part of the Levantine Cuisine.. It includes an Abundance of Whole Grains, Fruits, Vegetables, Starches, Fresh Fish and Seafood ; Animal Fats are consumed sparingly. Poultry is eaten more often than Red Meat. Many Dishes in the Lebanese Cuisine can be traced back thousands of years to Eras of Roman and Phoenician Rule. More recently, Lebanese Cuisine was influenced by the different Foreign Civilizations that held Power. The Lebanese Cuisine is an Ancient one and part of the Levantine Cuisine.. It includes an Abundance of Whole Grains, Fruits, Vegetables, Starches, Fresh Fish and Seafood ; Animal Fats are consumed sparingly. Poultry is eaten more often than Red Meat. Many Dishes in the Lebanese Cuisine can be traced back thousands of years to Eras of Roman and Phoenician Rule. More recently, Lebanese Cuisine was influenced by the different Foreign Civilizations that held Power. In Lebanon, very rarely are Drinks served without being accompanied by Food. Similar to the Tapas of Spain, Mezeluri of Romania and Aperitivo of Italy. The Lebanese Diet focuses on Herbs, Spices, and Fresh Ingredients and relying less on Heavy Sauces. Mint, Parsley, Oregano, Garlic, Allspice, Nutmeg, and Cinnamon are the most common Seasonings. Bread, a Staple Food in Lebanon, is served with almost every Meal, most often as a Flat Bread, or Pita. Fruit, Vegetables, Rice, and Bread out-weigh the amount of Meat eaten in the average Lebanese Meal.
    [Show full text]