Timeline Towards Federation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

March 1897 – March 1898 All three sessions of the National Australasian Convention are held as they work towards creating a draft of the new Federal Constitution. January/February 1899 The Premiers of all six colonies meet to discuss changes to the proposed Constitution. They also decide on where the federal capital will be. April – September 1899 All referendums are held and won, except for Western Australia. November 1899 The Constitution Bill is passed in Queensland. December 1899 – March 1900 Australian delegates are invited to London to negotiate the enactment in Britain of the Constitution Bill. The first delegates meeting is held in London. July 1900 The Western Australian referendum is won. The Commonwealth Constitution Act is passed by the British Parliament. Queen Victoria gives royal assent to the Act. September 1900 Lord Hopetoun is appointed first Governor-General of Australia. January 1901 The Commonwealth of Australia is proclaimed in Centennial Park, Sydney. Edmund Barton is sworn in as Australia’s first Prime Minister. Queen Victoria dies and is succeeded by Edward Vll. March 1901 The new Commonwealth Government takes control of a wide range of functions formerly exercised by the colonies, including military forces, postal and customs departments and immigration. The Commonwealth’s constitutional powers also include: • Legislating for trade with other countries • Taxation • Customs and border defence • Banking – currency and coins • Weights and measures • Communication services • Railways • Census and statistics • Fisheries • Federal territories • Federal public service – including police, education, and health March 1901 The first Federal election is held. Adult men can vote in all states, but Aborigines and women can vote in only some states. A census shows the population of Australia is 3,773,801. Aborigines were not counted. May 1901 The first Federal Parliament is opened by the Duke of York (later to become George V) at the Exhibition Building Melbourne. The Parliament finally moves to Canberra in 1927 September 1901 Australia’s new national flag is flown for the first time. 32,823 entries were in the competition for its design. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

The Constitutional Requirements for the Royal Morganatic Marriage
The Constitutional Requirements for the Royal Morganatic Marriage Benoît Pelletier* This article examines the constitutional Cet article analyse les implications implications, for Canada and the other members of the constitutionnelles, pour le Canada et les autres pays Commonwealth, of a morganatic marriage in the membres du Commonwealth, d’un mariage British royal family. The Germanic concept of morganatique au sein de la famille royale britannique. “morganatic marriage” refers to a legal union between Le concept de «mariage morganatique», d’origine a man of royal birth and a woman of lower status, with germanique, renvoie à une union légale entre un the condition that the wife does not assume a royal title homme de descendance royale et une femme de statut and any children are excluded from their father’s rank inférieur, à condition que cette dernière n’acquière pas or hereditary property. un titre royal, ou encore qu’aucun enfant issu de cette For such a union to be celebrated in the royal union n’accède au rang du père ni n’hérite de ses biens. family, the parliament of the United Kingdom would Afin qu’un tel mariage puisse être célébré dans la have to enact legislation. If such a law had the effect of famille royale, une loi doit être adoptée par le denying any children access to the throne, the laws of parlement du Royaume-Uni. Or si une telle loi devait succession would be altered, and according to the effectivement interdire l’accès au trône aux enfants du second paragraph of the preamble to the Statute of couple, les règles de succession seraient modifiées et il Westminster, the assent of the Canadian parliament and serait nécessaire, en vertu du deuxième paragraphe du the parliaments of the Commonwealth that recognize préambule du Statut de Westminster, d’obtenir le Queen Elizabeth II as their head of state would be consentement du Canada et des autres pays qui required.
[Show full text]
Tfie Tont)ON , JULY 2, 1961. '4-401
TfiE tONt)ON , JULY 2, 1961. '4-401 War Office, July 2, 1901. Temporary Major Sir S. H. L. StUart, Bart"., THE King has been graciously pleased to give Deputy-Assistant Adjutant-General for' Im- orders for the following appointments to the perial Yeomanry, has relinquished his* Com- Distinguished Service Order, and promotion in mission. Dated 19th June, 1901. 1 the Army, in recognition of the services of the Temporary Captain H. E. Crawley, Staff Cap_- undermentioned Officers during the operations in tain for Imperial Yeomanry, has relinquished South Africa :— his Commission. Dated 19th June, 1901." " Lieutenant J. V. Dunn resigns his Commission. To be Companions of the Distinguished Service Dated 3rd July, 1901. Order:— Captain Oswald Buckley Bingham Smith- 1st Battalion, Sergeant J. Bradbury to be Lieu- Bingham, 3rd Dragoon Guards, for gallantry tenant, with the temporary rank of Lieutenant in the rearguard action on the 3rd June, near in the Army. Dated 20th May, 1901. Vrede. 2nd Battalion, To be Lieutenants, with the tern- Lieutenant James Robert White, the G-ordon porary rank of Lieutenant in the Army :— Highlanders, for having when taken prisoner, Corporal T. Thomas. Dated 17 ih April, 1901. , owing to mistaking advancing Boers for Private G. B. Drummond. Dated 17th April, British troops, and stripped, escaped from 1901. custody and run six miles, warning Colonel Private E. C. Palmer. Dated|17th April, 1901. de Lisle, and advanced with him to relief of Second Lieutenant B. O. Bethell, from Unat- Major Sladen's force. tached. Dated 15th May, 1901. Lieutenant Edgar John Flynn Langley, South 3rd Battalion^ The undermentioned Officers resign Australian Mounted Infantry, for gallantry their Commissions:— during the action with Major Sladen's force.
[Show full text]
[ ~ Floods in Central Texas, August 1978
Floods in Central Texas, August 1978 - rt • -r .- r .,.... ... :-< ~ i'f tit ""' • f:• .... .!..J ~ 'tc.J· .... ''.' t r [ ~ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY ::;;: ?l Open-File Report 79-682 0.. 0.. (1) :::: ~ I I 'Tl ~ 0 0 ... - 0.. V> . ~R_AI.!J}ALL _ 1-'• ::s (") (1) ::s .,rt - ?l ! ~ (/) 20 w ~ u z V> rt Prepared in cooperation with the State of Texas and other agencia Cover photograph, Brazos River in flood at Graham, by Randy Black, Dallas, Texas. Floods in Central Texas, August 1978 By E.E. Schroeder, B.C. Massey, and Kidd M. Waddell U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 79-682 Prepared in cooperation with the State of Texas and other agencies April 1979 Reproduced by the Texas Department of Water Resources as part of the continuing program of cooperation in water-resources investigations between the Department of Water Resources and the U.S. Geological Survey. Copies of this report may be obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey Federal Building 300 East 8th Street Austin, TX 78701 CONTENTS Page Abstract---------------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction-----------------------------.------------------------- 2 Purpose and scope of this report----------------------------- 2 Definitions of terms and abbreviations----------------------- 2 Metric conversions------------------------------------------- 3 Description of the storm-----------~------------------------------ 3 Description of the floods----------------------------------------- 4 Nueces River basin------------------------------------------- 4 Guadalupe River
[Show full text]
Portland Daily Press
PORTLAND DAILY JUNE ~ PRESS. ^ESTABLISHED 23, 1802-VOL. 39. FATT7'1LAND’ MAINE. MONDAY _ — — MORNING, * SEPTEMBER * * a. 1900 | nmir /^kl__ .i. ^*—1 i CLASS MAIL MATTKIL ( ■ IV. I I K T H R E R Hr^r R NT F„ Q — —, >vm u« encouraged to 11J1L IV oL I ILIV. in Pt persist their [ present uml the muzzle of a 1 policy rifle sticking out from the powers will have the whole trouble to heavy growth, discharged his revolver lay marksmen enjoyed a rest thresh over REIGiV today. The again every two or three OF TERROR several times in that direction. As soon shooting will be resumed at the years. I different believe that all of the as possible he went to govern- the shore and as ranges tomorrow and ments are morning it is ex- impressed with this truth and soon as he took his paddle in his pected that the week there I believe most hand, during will ?stion Should of them realize that a deli- his Eastern having dropped revolver, another shot be some high class done nite and shooting In the permanent settlement of the came from an unknown source. This several contests which are to be decided. status of and the time Be Ef posed Of. foreigners establishment he was not able to return the The ranks of the of shot shooters were consid- n freedom of trade are more to but pressed toward K..® important 6hore, being in hopes erably augmented today by tne arrival of cr them now than the to flnu hi6 _ acquisition of terri- Still would-be assassin.
[Show full text]
Buffalo 1901 the Assassination of President William Mckinley Shortly
Buffalo 1901 The Assassination of President William McKinley Shortly after 4 PM on the afternoon of 6 September 1901, President William McKinley stood on the stage of the Temple of Music to greet the last group of well wishers who had waited in line to shake his hand at a public reception. McKinley reached out to a 28 year old man who was holding a handkerchief in his hand, not unusual since the day was rather hot and humid. But Leon Czolgosz had a 32 caliber revolver concealed under his handkerchief. Two shots rang out, the first nicked a button on the President’s vest and glanced off his chest, the second penetrated his stomach. Pandemonium ensued. One of the guards named O’Brien, and James Parker, a tall black man waiting in the line just behind Czolgosz, immediately grabbed the assassin and began punching him in the face. Czolgosz fell to the floor and other guards joined in. Czolgosz, in the words of an eye witness, was a “bloody mess”. Another guard grabbed the revolver out of Czolgosz’s right hand. The beating would have continued, had McKinley not said "Go easy on him boys" or "Don't let them hurt him". Whatever the exact words, they saved Czolgosz's life, at least temporarily. The guards stopped their assault and the President's health was given priority. The officials on the stage with McKinley eased him onto the floor. Word quickly spread of the shooting, and mob mentality took over, with crowds outside beating on the door and shouting death threats for the shooter.
[Show full text]
The January 1901 Special National Convention of the Social Democratic Party of America by A.S
The January 1901 Special National Convention of the Social Democratic Party of America by A.S. Edwards 1 (January 26, 1901) The special national convention of the Social Democratic Party of America, which opened in Aldine Hall, Chicago, at 10 o’clock Tuesday morning, January 15 [1901], was attended by a larger number of individual delegates than the convention at Indianapolis last March [1st: March 6-9, 1900]. The principal object of the former gathering was the nomination of Presidential candidates; that of the present one to dispose of the question of the consolidation of the socialists of the United States.2 For nearly a year, during which the campaign prosecuted a national campaign and found its resources taxed to the utmost in discharging its duty to the cause of socialism, it has found itself harassed by persistent misrepresentations of the attitude of its members toward the question of union with the Rochester faction of the Socialist Labor Party and a few bolters from its own ranks. The officers and members of the party have never been opposed to union os socialists; they have stood almost solidly against the surrender of the Social Democratic Party organization to the control of those who, by methods now familiar to and condemned by the socialists of the country generally, sought its destruction. The convention just held was a complete and splendid vindication of the course pursued by those in temporary control of the party’s interests, in local branch and national board, and the inspiriting outcome of the four days’ deliberations, marked by the truest devotion, tolerance, and comradeship,3 is that the Social Democratic Party is on record not merely for union with a faction which has attempted to destroy it, but for a consolidation of all the organized socialists of the country, whether constituted as national parties or in isolated state and territorial organizations.
[Show full text]
Hurricane Flooding
ATM 10 Severe and Unusual Weather Prof. Richard Grotjahn L 18/19 http://canvas.ucdavis.edu Lecture 18 topics: • Hurricanes – what is a hurricane – what conditions favor their formation? – what is the internal hurricane structure? – where do they occur? – why are they important? – when are those conditions met? – what are they called? – What are their life stages? – What does the ranking mean? – What causes the damage? Time lapse of the – (Reading) Some notorious storms 2005 Hurricane Season – How to stay safe? Note the water temperature • Video clips (colors) change behind hurricanes (black tracks) (Hurricane-2005_summer_clouds-SST.mpg) Reading: Notorious Storms • Atlantic hurricanes are referred to by name. – Why? • Notorious storms have their name ‘retired’ © AFP Notorious storms: progress and setbacks • August-September 1900 Galveston, Texas: 8,000 dead, the deadliest in U.S. history. • September 1906 Hong Kong: 10,000 dead. • September 1928 South Florida: 1,836 dead. • September 1959 Central Japan: 4,466 dead. • August 1969 Hurricane Camille, Southeast U.S.: 256 dead. • November 1970 Bangladesh: 300,000 dead. • April 1991 Bangladesh: 70,000 dead. • August 1992 Hurricane Andrew, Florida and Louisiana: 24 dead, $25 billion in damage. • October/November 1998 Hurricane Mitch, Honduras: ~20,000 dead. • August 2005 Hurricane Katrina, FL, AL, MS, LA: >1800 dead, >$133 billion in damage • May 2008 Tropical Cyclone Nargis, Burma (Myanmar): >146,000 dead. Some Notorious (Atlantic) Storms Tracks • Camille • Gilbert • Mitch • Andrew • Not shown: – 2004 season (Charley, Frances, Ivan, Jeanne) – Katrina (Wilma & Rita) (2005) – Sandy (2012), Harvey (2017), Florence & Michael (2018) Hurricane Camille • 14-19 August 1969 • Category 5 at landfall – for 24 hours – peak winds 165 kts (190mph @ landfall) – winds >155kts for 18 hrs – min SLP 905 mb (26.73”) – 143 perished along gulf coast, – another 113 in Virginia Hurricane Andrew • 23-26 August 1992 • Category 5 at landfall • first Category 5 to hit US since Camille • affected S.
[Show full text]
The Governor Genera. and the Head of State Functions
The Governor Genera. and the Head of State Functions THOMAS FRANCK* Lincoln, Nebraska In most, though by no means all democratic states,' the "Head o£ State" is a convenient legal and political fiction the purpose of which is to personify the complex political functions of govern- ment. What distinguishes the operations of this fiction in Canada is the fact that the functions of head of state are not discharged by any one person. Some, by legislative enactment, are vested in the Governor General. Others are delegated to the Governor General by the Crown. Still others are exercised by the Queen in person. A survey of these functions will reveal, however, that many more of the duties of the Canadian head of state are to-day dis- charged by the Governor General than are performed by the Queen. Indeed, it will reveal that some of the functions cannot be dis- charged by anyone else. It is essential that we become aware of this development in Canadian constitutional practice and take legal cognizance of the consequently increasing stature and importance of the Queen's representative in Canada. Formal Vesting of Head of State Functions in Constitutional Governments ofthe Commonnealth Reahns In most of the realms of the Commonwealth, the basic constitut- ional documents formally vest executive power in the Queen. Section 9 of the British North America Act, 1867,2 states: "The Executive Government and authority of and over Canada is hereby declared to continue and be vested in the Queen", while section 17 establishes that "There shall be one Parliament for Canada, consist- ing of the Queen, an Upper House, styled the Senate, and the *Thomas Franck, B.A., LL.B.
[Show full text]
The Evolution of Australian Citizenship*
One Hundred Years of (Almost) Solitude: the Evolution of Australian Citizenship* Helen Irving On 1 January 1901, six of the Australasian colonies joined together in one ‘indissoluble federal Commonwealth’, as the words of the Preamble to the Australian Constitution put it. Massive celebrations accompanied the inauguration of the Commonwealth. They were repeated for the opening of the First Federal Parliament four months later, and again, around the new nation, for the tour of the Duke and Duchess of York that followed. The celebrations stretched over the first six months of that year. There were parades, banquets, picnics, sporting competitions, exhibitions and historical re- enactments. Streets were decorated, poems were composed, songs were sung, medals were struck, prisoners were pardoned, and fireworks lit again and again. What was being celebrated? Among the many other achievements of that day, Australians who read their newspapers learned on 1 January 1901, that they had become Australian citizens. It was a rather curious claim to make. There had been an attempt in 1898 to write a definition of citizenship into the Australian Constitution, but it had failed. Although the delegates to the Federal Convention laboured long and hard in their effort to say just what it was to be a citizen—traversing legal and political rights, as well as cultural attributes—the Constitution’s framers could not settle on a definition. * This paper was presented as a lecture in the Department of the Senate Occasional Lecture Series at Parliament House on 22 June 2001. Legally, Australians were British subjects, not citizens. To use the term ‘citizen’ meant going beyond this simple fact.
[Show full text]
February 16, 1901, Vol. 72, No. 1860
., : . I 1 1 Jmintiw Quotation Supplement (Monthly) Street Railway Supplement (^mam^^ Inveator^ Supplement (Quarterly) Stale and Cihj Supplement (^Amu^n^ [Entered aooordlng to Act of OonfrresB, In the year 1900, by the William B. Dasa OOKPAlfT, In the offlM of the Llbrarlui of OongreBa.] VOL. 72. SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 1901. NO. 18«0. Wttt eruting February 9 OUaringt at— 1901. 1900. 1901. 1899 1898. PUBLISHED WEEKLY. New York ,63O,»07,9eO 1.106,832.0701 133.486.098 78S 199,648 Philadelphia 84,8^,5!^9 B'*,7''6,iei 9*J,0I3 613 55,742.850 Termg of Subscription—Payable in Advance Pittsbar^ 8H,894.693 29,485 5x7 38,966.5(M 17,60 [.7b8 Baltimore 19,796 993 1^,910,581 lX,2Se.li51 16 862.191 For One Year $10 00 Buffalo 5.231,l(-3 4,b68,076i 4.918.135 4016.765 For Six Months 6 00 Washington. 8,l33,Cai 2.»)6O,310 2,3 19. .301 1 099,181 Eoropean Subscription (Inolnding postage) 13 00 Albany 8,112.612 2,961, H4 8.360,rX)0 European Subscription Six Months (Including postage) 7 50 Rochester 2,306.789 2,162,7881 8.4:-0 101 1.400.723 Syracuse l,Si88,767 1,25 i, 031 963.965 942.961 Annual Subscription In London (Inolndlng postage) <2 14b Scranton. 1,018,924 &9t.786l 7tJ6,ttl9 690.688 BlxMos. do. do. do. Al lis. WllmlnKton 1,025,137 889.0S0 808.241 785.808 Blntcbamton 8«8,H00 429.600 82rf.700| 894.000 Above subscription Includes— Chester 245,081 253.*!- 300.0001 Thb Quotation supplement 8TKEET Railway Supplement Total Middle 1.801.852,197 1,261,341,876 l,299,»i7,i«j! THB INVE8TOE8' SUPPLBMBNT State and City Supplement &25.680,441 Boston 128,189.251 137,20S.331 130 100,416 110 331,883 Terms ot Adyertlsing—(Per Inch Space.) Providence , 6,460900 6,378,900 6,159,600 5.3U,6C0 Hartford 2.392,516 2.557.226 2.603,763 1,'-0Q,109 Transient matter $4 20 Three Months (13 times) .$29 00 New Haven 1,657.776 1.3«1,436 1,887.303 " 1,408,151 8TANDINO BUSINESS OAKDS.
[Show full text]
The Sovereign and Parliament
Library Note The Sovereign and Parliament The Sovereign fulfils a number of ceremonial and formal roles with respect to Parliament, established by conventions, throughout the parliamentary calendar. The State Opening of Parliament marks the beginning of each new session of Parliament. It is the only routine occasion when the three constituent parts of Parliament—that is the Sovereign, the House of Lords and the House of Commons—meet. The Queen’s Speech during State Opening is the central element around which the ceremony pivots, without which no business of either the House of Lords or the House of Commons can proceed. Each ‘Parliament’ lasts a maximum of five years, within which there are a number of sessions. Each session is ‘prorogued’ to mark its end. An announcement is made in the House of Lords, to Members of both Houses following the Queen’s command that Parliament should be prorogued by a commissioner of a Royal Commission. At the end of the final session of each Parliament—which is immediately prior to the next general election—Parliament is also dissolved. Following the Prime Minister’s advice, the Sovereign issues a proclamation summoning the new Parliament, appointing the day for the first meeting of Parliament. All bills must be agreed by both Houses of Parliament and the Sovereign before they can become Acts of Parliament. Once a bill has passed both Houses, it is formally agreed by the Sovereign by a process known as royal assent. Additionally, Queen’s consent is sometimes required before a bill completes its passage through Parliament, if the bill affects the Sovereign.
[Show full text]
Fact Sheet 2 the FIRST COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENT
Fact Sheet 2 THE FIRST COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENT 1901 FEDERATION AND ’S VOTE THE PEOPLE Overview 1897-1903 Once the Australian Constitution had been accepted by voters in the Australian colonies and enacted as law by British Parliament, the process of putting the new system of federal government into practice began. The Australian colonies were now States of the Commonwealth of Australia, and the office of Governor- General represented the reigning monarch of Britain as Head of the Commonwealth. The first Governor-General of Australia, Lord Hopetoun, proclaimed the Commonwealth of Australia at a special ceremony in Centennial Park, Sydney, 1 January 1901. It was also the Governor-General’s task to commission an interim or caretaker ministry until the Australian people were able to elect their representatives to the newly created Commonwealth Parliament. These interim ministers, with Edmund Barton as Prime Minister, were sworn in as part of the inaugural ceremony at Centennial Park. Over the next 1891 first Constitutional Convention to draft months they organised the first federal election and made a federal constitution arrangements for the opening of the first Commonwealth 1893 Parliament. first ‘people’s convention’ at Corowa 1897 The first federal election delegates elected to a representative Constitutional Convention On Friday 29 March and Saturday 30 (in Queensland and South Australia) voters took part in the first election of 1898-1900 referendums on the Constitution representatives to the Parliament of the Commonwealth of held in all colonies Australia. Because there was as yet no federal electoral law, 1901 the election took place in accordance with the voting 1 January - inauguration of the legislation in each of the States.
[Show full text]