DOCSLIB.ORG

Effect of Colonial Tunicate Presence on Ciona Intestinalis Recruitment Within a Mussel Farming Environment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Effect of Colonial Tunicate Presence on Ciona Intestinalis Recruitment Within a Mussel Farming Environment Management of Biological Invasions (2012) Volume 3, Issue 1: 15–23 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2012.3.1.02 Open Access © 2012 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2012 REABIC Research Article Effect of colonial tunicate presence on Ciona intestinalis recruitment within a mussel farming environment S. Christine Paetzold1, Donna J. Giberson2, Jonathan Hill1, John D.P. Davidson1 and Jeff Davidson1 1 Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island C1A 4P3, Canada 2 Department of Biology, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island C1A 4P3, Canada E-mail: [email protected] (SCP), [email protected] (DJG), [email protected] (JH), [email protected] (JDPD), [email protected] (JD) *Corresponding author Received: 4 November 2011 / Accepted: 7 August 2012 / Published online: 15 December 2012 Handling editor: Elias Dana, University of Almeria, Spain Abstract Aquatic invasive species decrease yields and increase costs in aquaculture operations worldwide. Anecdotal evidence from Prince Edward Island (PEI, Canada) estuaries suggested that recruitment of the non-indigenous solitary tunicate Ciona intestinalis may be lower on aquaculture gear where colonial tunicates (Botryllus schlosseri and Botrylloides violaceus) are already present. We tested this interspecific competition hypothesis by comparing C. intestinalis recruitment on un-fouled settlement plates to those pre-settled with Botryllus schlosseri or Botrylloides violaceus. C. intestinalis occurred on all plates after 2 month, but it was much more abundant (~80% coverage) on unfouled plates than on pre-settled plates (<10% coverage). However, C. intestinalis showed higher individual growth on pre-settled plates than on unfouled plates. High reproductive potential for C. intestinalis appears to result in rapid recruitment to control plates, but this may be impeded on pre-settled plates due to competition for space, negative settlement cues produced by the colonial tunicates, allelopathy or overgrowth. Key words: tunicates; ascidian; aquaculture; Botryllus schlosseri; Botrylloides violaceus species: Ciona intestinalis (L., 1758), Styela Introduction clava (Herdman, 1881), Botryllus schlosseri (Pallas, 1766) and Botrylloides violaceus Oka, Introductions of aquatic invasive species are 1927 (Locke et al. 2007). Tunicates (class becoming more and more common, especially Ascidiacea) are sessile filter feeders that settle those mediated by human actions (Carlton and on hard substrates (e.g. wharf pilings, buoys, Geller 1993; Ruiz et al. 1997; Cohen and Carlton aquaculture gear, hard-bodied biota) after a brief 1998; Ruiz et al. 2000). Often, invasive species period of a few hours to several days as free- preferentially settle on artificial substrates swimming larvae (Berrill 1950; Millar 1952; (Tyrrell and Byers 2007) such as ropes, nets, Dybern 1965; Yamaguchi 1975; Saito et al. cages and other gear used in aquaculture 1981; Jackson 2005). The blue mussel (Mytilus operations worldwide (Lambert 2007). The edulis L., 1758) aquaculture industry in Atlantic impacts, both on the native populations also Canada has been adversely affected by these living on these artificial substrates (K. Ellis, non-indigenous tunicates, especially by the pers. comm.) and the aquaculture economy, can solitary species C. intestinalis (Carver et al. be detrimental (e.g. Carver et al. 2003; Lutz- 2003, 2006; Daigle and Herbinger 2009). For Collins et al. 2009). In recent years, Prince example, since C. intestinalis consists of 95% Edward Island (PEI; Canada) estuaries have water (calculated from data in Carver et al. experienced the introduction of 4 tunicate 2006), it adds considerable weight to mussel 15 S.C. Paetzold et al. socks (>3 kg m–1; Ramsay et al. 2008b), leading surface compared to the finite shape of a solitary to increased labour and crop losses. Especially in tunicate, though solitary species can also often recent years, research efforts have focused on be found in large groups of individuals. Studies preventing or mitigating C. intestinalis fouling on competitive superiority of one species over on mussel socks (e.g. Bakker et al. 2011; another have had differing outcomes. Botryllus Paetzold and Davidson 2011; Parent et al. 2011). schlosseri was a dominant competitor whose While mussel growers on PEI consider colonial presence deterred some species from settling on tunicates a nuisance species, research has not the same substrate in a fouling community in one shown any adverse effects of Botryllus schlosseri study (Grosberg 1981). However, established and Botrylloides violaceus on cultured mussels Botryllus schlosseri colonies had no effect on (Arens et al. 2011; N. McNair, PEI Department larval settlement by other species in a different of Fisheries, Aquaculture and Rural study (Bullard et al. 2004), leading those Development, pers. comm.), possibly because researchers to hypothesize that invertebrate the colonial tunicate fouling levels on assessed larvae do not avoid settling near superior mussel socks were low (maximum of ~0.36 kg competitors (Bullard et al. 2004; see also Osman m–1; Arens et al. 2011). The values reported here and Whitlatch 2004). Similarly, a previous study for both Ramsay et al. (2008b) and Arens et al. led some of the same researchers to negate (2011) are based on assessments of spring- species dominance (i.e. superior ability to settle) socked mussel socks in October of the socking as a factor in settlement and instead explain the year; thus on similar socks, colonial tunicates success of a settler based on species richness on add 10-times less weight to the sock than a substrate (Stachowicz et al. 1999). In C. intestinalis. particular, Stachowicz et al. (1999) found that In Cardigan River in eastern PEI, Mytilus more diverse communities prevented settlement edulis is grown throughout the estuary, and C. by invaders, likely by occupying all available intestinalis has become a serious fouler on substrates and quickly filling new space, e.g. mussel leases. Since being discovered in this through expansion of existing colonies, such that estuary in 2005, this tunicate has spread rapidly new invaders had little chance of recruitment. throughout the ecosystem and quickly Determining the competitive interactions established itself as the dominant tunicate among the invasive tunicate species on PEI is species. Ramsay et al. (2008a) also reported this important to better understand recruitment phenomenon in the adjacent Brudenell River. hierarchies of these fouling organisms on However, anecdotal reports from mussel growers aquaculture gear. Mitigation strategies could be and SCUBA divers working on the leases more effective if designed to target a dominant suggest that densities of C. intestinalis were tunicate species or allowing a lesser nuisance lower on socks heavily fouled by the colonial species such as a colonial tunicate to outcompete ascidians Botryllus schlosseri and Botrylloides a more detrimental species like C. intestinalis. violaceus. Therefore, the objective of this study was to Colonial tunicates have 2 main advantages assess the effect of the presence of Botryllus that could lead to their dominance over solitary schlosseri or Botrylloides violaceus on the species on hard substrates. First, colonial larvae recruitment and growth of the solitary tunicate are larger than those of solitary species, giving C. intestinalis. This assessment involved an in them survival and growth advantages (Marshall situ study comparing C. intestinalis % cover, and Keough 2005; Marshall et al. 2006). Among length and abundance on bare plates (controls) the study species, the larvae of Botrylloides and plates that were pre-settled with Botryllus violaceus are approximately 3 times larger than schlosseri or Botrylloides violaceus. those of C. intestinalis and Botryllus schlosseri (Bullard and Whitlatch 2004), and colonial juveniles grow up to 4 to 6 times larger than C. Methods intestinalis within the first week post-settlement Development of colonial tunicate colonies (Bullard and Whitlatch 2004). Second, colonial on experimental surfaces tunicates can reproduce asexually by budding and fragmenting/ regenerating and are therefore The first phase of the project (pre-settlement; 29 not dependent on the time limitations of gamete June to 20 September 2007) was conducted in 2 production. With asexual reproduction comes the bays located on the north shore of PEI (Canada): possibility of continued mat-like growth over a St. Peters Bay (46.432°N, 62.676°W) and Savage 16 Effect of colonial tunicate presence on Ciona intestinalis recruitment Figure 1. The Savage Harbour and St. Peters Bay collection sites and the study site in Cardigan River in Prince Edward Island (PEI), Canada. QC: Quebec, NB: New Brunswick, NS: Nova Scotia, NL: Newfoundland. Harbour (46.416°N, 62.833°W) (Figure 1). These SCUBA divers 2 months after deployment and bays were selected as sites for pre-settling transported to the Cardigan River study site in experimental substrates because both bays ambient seawater, taking care to prevent contained no solitary tunicates but high levels of interspecific mixing and damage to the tunicate the colonial tunicates, Botryllus schlosseri and colonies. Water temperatures at both sites ranged Botrylloides violaceus, respectively (J. Hill and from 14 to 22°C (18 ± 2.5°C, mean ± SD) during J.D.P. Davidson pers. obs.).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Colonial Tunicates: Species Guide
    SPECIES IN DEPTH Colonial Tunicates Colonial Tunicates Tunicates are small marine filter feeder animals that have an inhalant siphon, which takes in water, and an exhalant siphon that expels water once it has trapped food particles. Tunicates get their name from the tough, nonliving tunic formed from a cellulose-like material of carbohydrates and proteins that surrounds their bodies. Their other name, sea squirts, comes from the fact that many species will shoot LambertGretchen water out of their bodies when disturbed. Massively lobate colony of Didemnum sp. A growing on a rope in Sausalito, in San Francisco Bay. A colony of tunicates is comprised of many tiny sea squirts called zooids. These INVASIVE SEA SQUIRTS individuals are arranged in groups called systems, which form interconnected Star sea squirts (Botryllus schlosseri) are so named because colonies. Systems of these filter feeders the systems arrange themselves in a star. Zooids are shaped share a common area for expelling water like ovals or teardrops and then group together in small instead of having individual excurrent circles of about 20 individuals. This species occurs in a wide siphons. Individuals and systems are all variety of colors: orange, yellow, red, white, purple, grayish encased in a matrix that is often clear and green, or black. The larvae each have eight papillae, or fleshy full of blood vessels. All ascidian tunicates projections that help them attach to a substrate. have a tadpole-like larva that swims for Chain sea squirts (Botryloides violaceus) have elongated, less than a day before attaching itself to circular systems. Each system can have dozens of zooids.
    [Show full text]
  • De Novo Draft Assembly of the Botrylloides Leachii Genome
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/152983; this version posted June 21, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 De novo draft assembly of the Botrylloides leachii genome 2 provides further insight into tunicate evolution. 3 4 Simon Blanchoud1#, Kim Rutherford2, Lisa Zondag1, Neil Gemmell2 and Megan J Wilson1* 5 6 1 Developmental Biology and Genomics Laboratory 7 2 8 Department of Anatomy, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, 9 Dunedin 9054, New Zealand 10 # Current address: Department of Zoology, University of Fribourg, Switzerland 11 12 * Corresponding author: 13 Email: [email protected] 14 Ph. +64 3 4704695 15 Fax: +64 479 7254 16 17 Keywords: chordate, regeneration, Botrylloides leachii, ascidian, tunicate, genome, evolution 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/152983; this version posted June 21, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 18 Abstract (250 words) 19 Tunicates are marine invertebrates that compose the closest phylogenetic group to the 20 vertebrates. This chordate subphylum contains a particularly diverse range of reproductive 21 methods, regenerative abilities and life-history strategies. Consequently, tunicates provide an 22 extraordinary perspective into the emergence and diversity of chordate traits. Currently 23 published tunicate genomes include three Phlebobranchiae, one Thaliacean, one Larvacean 24 and one Stolidobranchian. To gain further insights into the evolution of the tunicate phylum, 25 we have sequenced the genome of the colonial Stolidobranchian Botrylloides leachii.
    [Show full text]
  • Styela Clava (Tunicata, Ascidiacea) – a New Threat to the Mediterranean Shellfish Industry?
    Aquatic Invasions (2009) Volume 4, Issue 1: 283-289 This is an Open Access article; doi: 10.3391/ai.2009.4.1.29 © 2009 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2009 REABIC Special issue “Proceedings of the 2nd International Invasive Sea Squirt Conference” (October 2-4, 2007, Prince Edward Island, Canada) Andrea Locke and Mary Carman (Guest Editors) Short communication Styela clava (Tunicata, Ascidiacea) – a new threat to the Mediterranean shellfish industry? Martin H. Davis* and Mary E. Davis Fawley Biofouling Services, 45, Megson Drive, Lee-on-the-Solent, Hampshire, PO13 8BA, UK * Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Received 29 January 2008; accepted for special issue 17 April 2008; accepted in revised form 17 December 2008; published online 16 January 2009 Abstract The solitary ascidian Styela clava Herdman, 1882 has recently been found in the Bassin de Thau, France, an area of intensive oyster and mussel farming. The shellfish are grown on ropes suspended in the water column, similar to the technique employed in Prince Edward Island (PEI), Canada. S. clava is considered a major threat to the mussel industry in PEI but, at present, it is not considered a threat to oyster production in the Bassin de Thau. Anoxia or the combined effect of high water temperature and high salinity may be constraining the growth of the S. clava population in the Bassin de Thau. Identification of the factors restricting the population growth may provide clues to potential control methods. Key words: Styela clava, shellfish farming, Bassin de Thau Introduction Subsequent examination confirmed that the specimens were Styela clava Herdman, 1882 The solitary ascidian Styela clava is native to the (Davis and Davis 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Harbour Authority Aquatic Invasive Non-Native Species Plan
    Portland Harbour Authority Aquatic Invasive Non-Native Species Plan PORTLAND HARBOUR AUTHORITY AQUATIC INVASIVE NON-NATIVE SPECIES PLAN version 16th June 2019 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. What are invasive non-native (alien) species and where do they come from? 3. GB Non-Native Species Strategy 4. Classification of aquatic non-native (alien) species in the UK according to their level of impact? 5. Considerations relating to user interests ➢ Designated nature conservation sites & invasive species considerations ➢ Ports and Shipping and Biosecurity ➢ Recreational Boating and Biosecurity ➢ Fisheries and Biosecurity 6. What are Portland Harbour Authority doing? 7. Review by Portland Harbour Authority of Invasive Non-native Species 8. Reporting Non-Native Species, Updates and How to find out more? FIGURES 1. Portland Port Group Landownership and Jurisdiction TABLES 1. Invasive non-native species (UKTAG Classification) - Animal Species 2. Invasive non-native species (UKTAG Classification) - Plant Species 3. Non-native species - Animal Species 4. Non-native species - Plant Species Appendices A. Indicative distribution of biotopes in Portland Harbour taken from Marine Nature Conservation Review Sector 8 Inlets in the Western English Channel: area summaries 1 Version 16th June 2019 Portland Harbour Authority Aquatic Invasive Non-Native Species Plan 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1.1 This is the first version of Portland Harbour Authority’s (part of Portland Port Group) Aquatic Invasive Non-Native (Alien) Species Plan, that documents its understanding of invasive non-native species (and other harmful organisms such as diseases) in its jurisdiction and surroundings, considerations relating user interests, and potential measures going forward to improve understanding and reduce the overall risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Indigenous Tunicates in the Bay of Fundy, Eastern Canada (2006–2009)
    Aquatic Invasions (2011) Volume 6, Issue 4: 405–412 doi: 10.3391/ai.2011.6.4.05 Open Access © 2011 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2011 REABIC Proceedings of the 3rd International Invasive Sea Squirt Conference, Woods Hole, USA, 26–28 April 2010 Research Article Non-indigenous tunicates in the Bay of Fundy, eastern Canada (2006–2009) Jennifer L. Martin1*, Murielle M. LeGresley1, Bruce Thorpe2 and Paul McCurdy1 1 Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Biological Station, 531 Brandy Cove Rd., St. Andrews, New Brunswick, E5B 2L9 Canada 2 New Brunswick Department of Agriculture, Aquaculture and Fisheries, 107 Mount Pleasant Rd., St. George, New Brunswick, E5C 3S9 Canada E-mail: [email protected] (JLM), [email protected] (MML), [email protected] (BT), [email protected] (PM) *Corresponding author Received: 26 November 2010 / Accepted: 19 April 2011 / Published online: 14 July 2011 Editor’s note: This paper is a contribution to the proceedings of the 3rd International Invasive Sea Squirt Conference held in Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA, on 26–28 April 2010. The conference provided a venue for the exchange of information on the biogeography, ecology, genetics, impacts, risk assessment and management of invasive tunicates worldwide. Abstract A monitoring programme was initiated in 2006 to detect invasive tunicates, especially Ciona intestinalis, Botryllus schlosseri, Didemnum vexillum, Botrylloides violaceus and Styela clava, in Atlantic Canada. Collectors were deployed at 11–21 monitoring stations in the southwestern New Brunswick portion of the Bay of Fundy from 2006-2009, starting in late May with some retrieved in August while others remained in the water until later in the fall.
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland: a Laboratory for Non-Indigenous Ascidians
    BioInvasions Records (2020) Volume 9, Issue 3: 450–460 CORRECTED PROOF Research Article Iceland: a laboratory for non-indigenous ascidians Alfonso A. Ramos-Esplá1,*, Joana Micael2, Halldór P. Halldórsson3 and Sindri Gíslason2 1Research Marine Centre of Santa Pola (CIMAR), University of Alicante, 03080 Alicante, Spain 2Southwest Iceland Nature Research Centre (SINRC), 245 Suðurnesjabær, Iceland 3University of Iceland, Sudurnes Research Center, 245 Suðurnesjabær, Iceland *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Citation: Ramos-Esplá AA, Micael J, Halldórsson HP, Gíslason S (2020) Abstract Iceland: a laboratory for non-indigenous ascidians. BioInvasions Records 9(3): 450– Non-indigenous species (NIS) represent a serious problem worldwide, where ascidians 460, https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2020.9.3.01 are one of the most important taxa. However, little has been done to document the non-indigenous ascidians in Iceland, and over the past decade only two species had Received: 30 October 2019 been recorded prior to the present study, Ciona intestinalis in 2007 and Botryllus Accepted: 19 March 2020 schlosseri in 2011. To increase the knowledge of this taxon, extensive sampling Published: 7 May 2020 was carried out in shallow waters around Iceland, during the summer 2018, in ports Handling editor: Noa Shenkar and on ropes of a long-line mussel aquaculture. In total, eleven species were identified, Thematic editor: Stelios Katsanevakis four native and seven NIS, of which Diplosoma listerianum, Ascidiella aspersa, Copyright: © Ramos-Esplá et al. Botrylloides violaceus, Molgula manhattensis and Ciona cf. robusta, are now reported This is an open access article distributed under terms for the first time in Iceland.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Version
    MarLIN Marine Information Network Information on the species and habitats around the coasts and sea of the British Isles Star ascidian (Botryllus schlosseri) MarLIN – Marine Life Information Network Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Review Dr Keith Hiscock 2008-05-08 A report from: The Marine Life Information Network, Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. Please note. This MarESA report is a dated version of the online review. Please refer to the website for the most up-to-date version [https://www.marlin.ac.uk/species/detail/1340]. All terms and the MarESA methodology are outlined on the website (https://www.marlin.ac.uk) This review can be cited as: Hiscock, K. 2008. Botryllus schlosseri Star ascidian. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity Key Information Reviews, [on-line]. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.17031/marlinsp.1340.2 The information (TEXT ONLY) provided by the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Note that images and other media featured on this page are each governed by their own terms and conditions and they may or may not be available for reuse. Permissions beyond the scope of this license are available here. Based on a work at www.marlin.ac.uk (page left blank) Date: 2008-05-08 Star ascidian (Botryllus schlosseri) - Marine Life Information Network See online review for distribution map Colony of Botryllus schlosseri on rock. Distribution data supplied by the Ocean Photographer: Keith Hiscock Biogeographic Information System (OBIS).
    [Show full text]
  • Styela Clava
    NOBANIS - Marine invasive species in Nordic waters - Fact Sheet Styela clava Author of this species fact sheet: Kathe R. Jensen, Zoological Museum, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 København Ø, Denmark. Phone: +45 353-21083, E-mail: [email protected] Bibliographical reference – how to cite this fact sheet: Jensen, Kathe R. (2010): NOBANIS – Invasive Alien Species Fact Sheet – Styela clava – From: Identification key to marine invasive species in Nordic waters – NOBANIS www.nobanis.org, Date of access x/x/201x. Species description Species name Styela clava (Herdman, 1881) Synonyms Styela mammiculata Carlisle, 1954; Bostryorchis clava Redikorzev, 1916; Styela barnharti Ritter & Forsyth, 1917. Common names Clubbed tunicate, Leathery sea squirt, Asian tunicate, Rough sea squirt (USA, CAN, UK); Østasiatisk søpung (DK); Østasiatisk sekkedyr (NO); Östasiatisk sjöpung (SE); Ostasiatische Seeschiede, Falten Ascidie (GE); Japanse zakpijp (NL); Ascidie plissée (FR); Ascidia plisada (SP). Taxonomic problem The authority is sometimes gives as Herdman, 1882, sometimes as Herdman, 1881 or (Herdman, 1881). The WoRMS database (http://www.marinespecies.org/) gives (Herdman, 1881) as the correct authority and Fleming, 1822 as the author for the genus Styela. However, all three versions are still used in the scientific literature. Identification This is a relatively large (often >10 cm long), stalked, solitary sea aquirt, which is often found associated with man-made structures, seaweeds or shellfish. It has a warty exterior and a long stalk. There are several native species of Styela, none of which have the long stalk, e.g. S. rustica (Linnaeus, 1767), S. coriacea (Alder & Hancock, 1848), S. gelatinosa (Traustedt, 1886), and S.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveys for Non-Indigenous Tunicate Species in Newfoundland, Canada (2006 – 2014): a First Step Towards Understanding Impact and Control
    Management of Biological Invasions (2016) Volume 7, Issue 1: 21–32 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2016.7.1.04 Open Access © 2016 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2016 REABIC Proceedings of the 5th International Invasive Sea Squirt Conference (October 29–31, 2014, Woods Hole, USA) Research Article Surveys for non-indigenous tunicate species in Newfoundland, Canada (2006 – 2014): a first step towards understanding impact and control 1 1 2 1 Cynthia H. McKenzie *, Kyle Matheson , Scott Caines and Terri Wells 1Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre, St. John’s, NL, A1C 5X1 Canada 2Qalipu Mi’kmaq First Nation Band, Corner Brook, NL, A2H 2Z4 Canada *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] Received: 15 April 2015 / Accepted: 30 September 2015 / Published online: 26 November 2015 Handling editor: Stephan Bullard Abstract Fisheries and Oceans Canada initiated survey and monitoring programs in 2006 to determine presence, geographic range, and subsequent spread of non-indigenous tunicates in Atlantic Canada. Although non-indigenous tunicates have impacted aquaculture industries in Atlantic Canada for over a decade, aquaculture operations in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) have not yet been affected. In this report, we document and explain results from biofouling collectors and various underwater techniques to survey and monitor for non-indigenous tunicates in NL between 2006 and 2014. During early surveys (2006–2007) we only observed low-impact invaders, Botryllus schlosseri and Botrylloides violaceus, at locations along the south coast of NL. Botryllus schlosseri became the most widely distributed species (18 locations within Placentia Bay) and evidence demonstrated spread to locations on the northeast (2011) and west (2013) coasts of NL.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts (In Speaking Order; As Listed in Program Schedule)
    Abstracts (in speaking order; as listed in program schedule) A remarkable case of non-invasion in British Columbia, Canada Gretchen Lambert Univ. of Washington Friday Harbor Laboratories, Friday Harbor WA 98177 Between July 21-August 11, 2017, a three-week comprehensive marine biodiversity survey was carried out at a small remote region of the central British Columbia coast at and near the Calvert Island Marine Station (Hakai Institute). There is no commercial shipping to this area and only a small amount of recreational-size boat traffic. The survey included daily sampling by the staff and a number of visiting taxonomists with specialties covering all the major groups of invertebrates. Many marine habitats were sampled: rocky and sand/gravel intertidal, eelgrass meadows, shallow and deeper subtidal by snorkel and scuba, plus artificial surfaces of settlement plates set out up to a year ago, and the sides and bottom of the large floating dock at the Institute. Many new species were recorded by all the taxonomists; in this limited remote area I identified 37 ascidian species, including 3 new species, which represents almost 1/3 of all the known North American species from Alaska to southern California. Remarkably, only one is a possible non-native, Diplosoma listerianum, and it was collected mostly on natural substrates including deeper areas sampled by scuba; one colony occurred on a settlement plate. There were no botryllids, no Styela clava, no Didemnum vexillum, though these are all common non-natives in other parts of BC and the entire U.S. west coast. Most of the species are the same as in northern California, Washington, and southern BC, with only a small overlap of a few of the known Alaska spp.
    [Show full text]
  • First Occurrence of the Invasive Tunicate Didemnum Vexillum in Eelgrass Habitat
    Aquatic Invasions (2010) Volume 5, Issue 1: 23-29 This is an Open Access article; doi: 10.3391/ai.2010.5.1.4 © 2010 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2010 REABIC Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Aquatic Invasive Species (19-23 April 2009, Montreal, Canada) Research article First occurrence of the invasive tunicate Didemnum vexillum in eelgrass habitat Mary R. Carman1* and David W. Grunden2 1Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 360 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA 2Town of Oak Bluffs Shellfish Department, P.O. Box 1327, Oak Bluffs, MA 02557, USA E-mail: [email protected] (MRC), [email protected] (DWG) *Corresponding author Received: 2 September 2009 / Accepted: 22 December 2009 / Published online: 6 January 2010 Abstract During the late 20th century, several species of alien tunicates invaded New England marine coastal waters. In Autumn 2008, we surveyed for tunicates in Lake Tashmoo, a protected marine pond with shellfish aquaculture operations and restored bay scallop Argopecten irradians irradians habitat on Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts. We found the invasive tunicates Ascidiella aspersa, Botrylloides violaceus, Botryllus schlosseri, Didemnum vexillum, Diplosoma listerianum, Styela clava and native tunicate Molgula manhattensis attached to artificial substrates throughout Lake Tashmoo and B. violaceus, B. schlosseri, D. vexillum, D. listerianum and M. manhattensis attached to eelgrass Zostera marina in the middle of Lake Tashmoo. Tunicates were growing on the stalk and blade of in situ eelgrass, floating pieces of eelgrass (a transport and dispersal mechanism), and pieces of eelgrass in fouling communities on boat hulls and aquaculture floats. Botrylloides violaceus, B. schlosseri, D.
    [Show full text]
  • M13391 Supp.Pdf
    Supplement to de Bettignies et al. (2020) – https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13391 Table S1. Complete list of taxa identified during the degradation with their corresponding trophic group: detritus feeders (DF), grazers (G), predators (P) and suspension-feeders (SF). The sum of the abundance of the three replicate cages is reported for each sampling time. Abundance / Trophic Taxons sampling time (weeks) group 2 4 6 11 15 20 24 Annelida Polychaeta Amblyosyllis sp. - Grube, 1857 P 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Branchiomma bairdi - (McIntosh, 1885) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Branchiomma bombyx - (Dalyell, 1853) SF 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 Eumida sanguinea - (Örsted, 1843) P 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Eupolymnia nebulosa - (Montagu, 1819) DF 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Eupolymnia nesidensis - (Delle Chiaje, 1828) DF 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Flabelligera affinis - M. Sars, 1829 DF 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Harmothoe extenuata - (Grube, 1840) P 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Harmothoe sp. - Kinberg, 1856 P 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 Hydroides norvegica - Gunnerus, 1768 SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Lanice conchilega - (Pallas, 1766) DF 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Lepidonotus clava - (Montagu, 1808) P 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 Lepidonotus squamatus - (Linnaeus, 1758) P 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Malmgrenia sp. - McIntosh, 1874 P 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Micronereis sp. - Claparède, 1863 DF 0 0 0 4 6 0 2 Micronereis variegata - Claparède, 1863 DF 0 0 1 6 6 0 2 Microspio sp.
    [Show full text]