Qffirg Qmq Rieraq
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
+TI{d TI*DT{ SPEED POST ei$q -dTqfci-qaffiE GOVEITNMENT OF INDIA Regional Office,,d;flq Weslern Region, tl.qtwul, T{ W qffirg qMq rieraq qqlq{"r ,T{c,, "Kendriya Paryavaran Bhavan,, sdrqq qq-d MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, FORESTS AND fu<r t-s io-e,Link Road No.3 CLIMATE CHANGE E-5,Rfuq{ q'n/Ravi Shankar Nagar, .iqrs (qoco) I Bhopal-4620 I 6 ( M:p. j -ftd-wr,z g Te lefax-242 6 6 1 5 2 4 6 5 4 6,2 4b3 I 02 er5sro /E-rnai I : rowz.bpl -rnef@n ic. i n o-qio: 6-MP A-ts/2014-BHO/ 2 A { ftqio, oB nonou. qR, fr guo tfto dtrfr, sEf{s' qc TglFrfter-m., qqfd{"T. Tq Tq q-crqTg qM,q riildq, GTtrq, ift-frt T. g,a qeilr, gRgI qqffi"r Tq-{, .ilq EFr i-s, cr$.rq, __ln^ 19 lqc'cll - 110003 frqq: Proposal for diversion of 160.00 ha for Rehabilitaiton of Village Retibandar from the Bori Sanctuary, under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 in Satpura tiger Reserve, District Hoshangabad of Madhya pradesh - Reg. lil{f, qrfiR, rie'i Tqfu-{ur, 4-{ \ri .i-d-qrg qMq Tiera-q, T$ ffi ?Fl q-{ oqio: a-t+/zot+-qw {ft Rqm 27 /oB/2014. q6}qq, gq-tff qMq-qT 1Mn riqfdd ig ffir+. 22/os/2014 oi retFT ftfteroT gs q-rn oTqlaq Em ft-ql" I sftT rslFT ftftei,'r Rd-C ail-dcqo ffi t-g or}Rf, o1 qr r€l t'r {i-dr{fr: sqlt-4aE{il'q I ( 3ITI{ gEIFT 5Uq g-q SI cover ccf Site Inspection Report by the Western Regional Office Bhopal Zone, Bhopal in respect of Rehabilitation of Village Retibandar from Bori Sanctuary in Satpura Tiger Reserve of district Hoshangabad of Madhya Pradesh : Introduction: To ensure proper development of the best habitat of the Indian Tiger i.e. the Bori Sanctuary, relocation of the existing RANTIB-ANDAR village from the core area is desirable. The rehabilitated villagers will be provided with the necessary financial and social benefits in addition to infrastructural facilities. For evacuation of villages and resettlement of affected persons 160 ha of forest land will be diverted for the use at new site. This area includes the agricultural land, @ 2 ha.lfamlly, construction of house, other community development programme and nester facilities. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion: Reserve Forest. Compartment No. RF- 86 Range Sukhtawa, Hoshangabad (T) Forest Division. Located on NH 69 on Itarsi- Betul section, near dhar barrier, boundary of Hoshangabad and Betul districts. How the land proposed for diversion is to be utilized? The Land is proposed for settlement of Village Ratibandar, which is to be relocated from the Critical Tiger Habitat/(CTH) core zone of Satpura Tiger Reserve. Whether the proposal involves any construction of buildings (including residential) or not? Ifyes, details thereof: No pre-existing buildings present at proposed site. Proposals involve construction of residential quarters for villagers, Primary School, Community Hall, Temple and development of agricultural fields, ponds, roads inside the village. Total cost of the project at present rates: Rs. 12.30 crore Wildlife: Whether forest area proposed for diversion is important from wildlife point of view? The space vacated from Ratibandar forest village will be utilized as CTH of STR. The Ratibandar village is located in critical'Tiger Habitat (CTH) of Satpura Tiger Reserve. It is located deep inside the CTH. Relocation of this village will restore the habitat and provide an inviolate space of around 250ha. of land Aerial distance from the nearest boundary of any Protected Area: (In case the distance the protected area is less than 10 kms, clearance from the Standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife is required before the file can be processed for forest clearance) The distance of the proposed area from nearest protected area boundary is more than 10 km. Vegetation: a) Total number of trees to be felled i. Total number of trees proposed to be felled : 80g ii. Number of trees to be felled of girth below 60 cm : 247 iii. Number of trees to be felled of girth above 60 cm : 567 b) Effect of removal of trees on the general ecosystem in the area It is class V quality forest adjoining to National Highway. Importantspecies: (10 to 15 tree species available in the site proposed for diversion will be given. In case there is any other plant species which is threatened or endangered is found in the area or any species is endemic to the area, should also be mentioned) The tree species include chloxylon swietania, Terminalia tomentosa, Madhuca indica, A-1512014 bellerica, Gardenia pinnnata, Diospyros melanoxylon, Buchanania lanzana, Soymida febrifuga No endangered species found in this area. Background note on the proposal: As per NTCA guidelines and the wildlife protection act 7972, it is mandatory for tiger reserves to have a Critical Tiger Habitat (CTH)/or inviolate Core Zone free from all type of biotic influence. CTH of STR has been notified on 24.12.2007. The proposed village for relocation, Ratibandar is located inside CTH of STR. Hence voluntary relocation of village Ratibandar is proposed. Relocation will benefit wildlife on one hand and lead to better socio economic life of the villagers on the other hand. The villagers will have access to all government development schemes and better facilities. Compensatory afforestation : a. Whether land proposed / selected for compensatory afforestation is suitable from plantation and management point of view? Not required. b. Whether land for compensatory afforestation is free from encroachments and other encumbrances? Not applicable. c. Whether land for compensatory afforestation is important from religious or archaeological point of view? Not applicable. d. Land identified for raising compensatory afforestation is in how many patches? Whether patches are compact or not? Not applicable. A.-1512014 e. Map with details. Not applicable. ''rhould Compensatory afforestation u..u be clearly shown on the map, patch wise and their contiguity to the forest area etc. Not applicable. g. Total financial outlay of ten year CA programme. Not applicable. 10 Whether the proposal involves any violation of Forest (Conservation) Act 1980? If yes' a detailed report on violation including action taken against the concerned officials. No 11 Whether the proposal involves rehabilitation of displaced persons. If yes, whether rehabilitation plan has been approved by the state government? The rehabilitation plan has been approved by the state govemment and also by NTCA Details to be furnished specifically if the rehabilitation plan would affect any other forest area by translocating oustees in and around the said forest. Yes other village is relocated nearby t2 Reclamation plan: Details and financial allocation: Not applicable. l3 Details on catchment and command area under the project. Catchment area treatment plan to prevent siltation of reservoir: Not applicable. A-t512014 Cost benefit ratio: It is a rehabilitation project, hence not applicable' Utility of the project: Numbers of Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribes to be benefited by the project. AII IZ3 relocation units belong to Schoduled Tribes. Previously, since the village was located deep inside the forest the villagers were cutoff from basic facilities like school, health center, market place and had to face many hardship in case of emergency like sickness etc. Relocation will result in creation of inviolate space in the critical Tiger habitat, free from all types of biotic disturbance and secondly it will give tribals better socio economic conditions for future development' 16 Whether land being diverted has any socio-culturaV religious value? Whether any sacred grove or very old growth trees/forests exist in the areas proposed for diversion? No 17 Recommendations of the Nodal Officer/PCCF and the State Government: The pCCF and the State Government have recommended the proposal for approval' 18 Site inspection rePort The site inspection was done by Shri S. K. Bhandari, Chief Conservator of Forests on 22.09.2014. The inspection report is enclosed containing comments on the altematives examined and recommendations of the inspecting officer' 19 Any other information related to the project: Pictures taken during site inspection of the area are enclosed to have an idea of the vegetation and other aspects ofthe forest area. A-15120t4 20 a) Regional Addl. Principal Chief Conservator of Forests shall give detailed comments on whether there are any alternative routes/ alignment for locating the project: RF-86 is proposed for resettlement. Dgrsity of forest is less than 0.1 (Degraded forest) fuither this area is located on NH 69 and hence is devoid of wildlife activity, Relocation of village will protect the land from encroachments. b) Recommendations of the Regional Addl. Principal Chief Conservator of Forests along with detailed reasons: The present site is best alternative because 1. No honey combing of forest is involved in future. 2. The NH 69 is passing through, hence wildlife sighting is almost absent. 3. No forest is involved in providing approach road to proposed relocation site. 4. The site is close to Kala-akhar railway station, hospital and school are within 5 km. 5. The proposed site is preferred because it will have less negative i on the near by forest and will prevent the land from possible future enc Addl. Principal Ch td'r of Forests (C) A-15120t4 .:,:1 SITE INSPECTION REPORT OF PROPOSAL FOR DERESERVATION OF 160.00 HA OF FOREST LAND FOR DISTRIBUTION FOR REHABILITATION OF VILLAGE RATIBANDAR FROM BORI SANCTUARY IN SATPU RA TIG ER RESERVE, DISTRICT HOSANGABAD OF.MADHYA PRADESH. lntroduction : The sitewas inspected by me on 22/09/2014 along with theofficersandstaff of stateForest Department, territorial and wildlife who facilitatea ihe inspection.