A1132-Ba2-001-Jpeg.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A1132-Ba2-001-Jpeg.Pdf T jX MANUFACTURED IN SOUTH AFRICA . ------ i£_3__ :__■ í í í v s 'v í V v : btillg «'ll ^under iy1' i floor|»-| . ‘like something m in the films’ I ... ■ u COURT REPORTER : A STILL with 11 vat» holding 500 gallons of illicit j - Vv‘ . --- ■ liquor was built in an underground chamber beneath ■- > ■/:: a house in Vrededorp, a Johannesburg magistrate was ■ ■{* told yesterday. S'-*'* ' *" • little weaker than ordinary brandy. I ' Ho Then, 58, a shop assistant, of Ho said in court that he ha.d set I Twenty-sixth Street, Vrededorp, up the equipment “as an expert-[ was fined a total of £200 (or one ment.” year) for possessing an unlicensed The magistrate, Mr. D. J. van I still and manufacturing taxable Schalkwyk, said: “This was high I liquor. capacity production—like some-1 r:. f ' ■■ w ; Mr. Pieter Retlef Erlank, an thing we see in films. Some of I ' - t i ' - ,; í ;: >’ -■ ' ■ - ■ ^ inspector from the Department of the people who drank it might | Customs and Excise, said that he have suffered injury.” V.': ■ J.f . ' went to the house on December The £200 fine was paid. 5M; 29. 1 Mr. C. H. ran Wyk prosecuted. "I found an underground room j underneath the house, with a steel pot, copper piping, an oil drum, ' Rv.j.v • nine vats with a 36-gallon capacity each, yeast, and wire baskets. HOLE IN WALL Mg • v ■" ' • . v- L I gained entrance to the room !by climbing through a cupboard, | crawling through a hole in the . wall, and climbing down a step I ladder.” The vats contained 500 gallons of illicit brew, said Mr. Erlank. In ^ the house were 40 quart bottles of spirits labelled gin, 31 quart : ' V 4' ' bottles and six imperial quarts of - • ‘ . ' . >'-y- - . - spirits labelled brandy. The brandy was 36.3 underproof—a ; ■ - . ■ ■ - . ‘ . •> . • • . - • H •. •',? • *... ■ V i . 7 ^ 1 ■ f t • -... - -■ *• . _; , » ý v .. -- .;ii, . /y. -a * * • :. -1. • . r- . 'MM- i . &' 'i w• l i': : ^ ' m ? " 1 l j! I. ' : : '. c •;>’/ -v “‘-.1 -• ■ , * . - -.. y. • .... X ÏÏ*. I 1 aiS- V i ;5i* gf- rife ' ■ . .••jr ___ jCiOrtV TuftggPLANS - A l-RACIAL PARLIAMENT Clear-cut statement of Federation policy Power will be retained by Whites in foreseeable future From STANLEY UYS ’ SUNDAY TIMES POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT | CAPE TOWN, Saturday. llTNITED PARTY policy will lead eventually to a racially-mixed Parliament, but power will be itained in the hands of the White group “for the fore­ seeable future.” This emphatic statement was made by United Party spokesmen this week after the first of a series of post-election meetings to review the party’s programme. The spokesmen denied, however, that there is “ virtually no difference" now Ifaetjaeen United Party and Progressive Party policy, as has been alleged in the Nation­ alist Press. all voters. In this way the White This number too could be in-j Following the publication of!group would ensure that control creased eventually and the| of the country would remain in M.P.s could be Asians. [an article by Mr. Marais Steyn 'civilised hands.” • The rest of the M.P.s would! jin the SUNDAY TIMES News The United Party has not be elected by Whites and, decided yet how many M.P.s the Coloureds together, and In time! [ Magazine last week giving Asians should have, but the Coloureds would be able tpj [details of the United Party's figure would not be fewer than nominate members of their own] 1 Race Federation ” plan, a three — this was the number group for election In constitu­ General Smuts wanted to give encies where this was practic-J I part?' spokesman outlined the Asians in 1946. able. [differences with the Progres- The Coloureds would be re­ stored to the common roll sub­ questions ject to certain qualifications fce- Referendum :ntal . difference,-oerase the United Party regards The deduction that members tike vote issue. them as members of the While, of the different race groups would SSive Party wanted Westernised group of the popula­ ultimately be able to elect M.P.s qualification test to tion. from their own^groups is inherent g ars, White and non-White— In the whole concept of race •jtlppidard VI certificate and an The Assembly federation. So is the idea of a Income of R600 a year. racially - integrated Parliament, If the United Party were to Government and Cabinet. come to power tomorrow the Seeing that White voters will Dilemma House of Assembly then would be predominate initially, they will be Under present conditions, said constituted as follows: in a position to regulate the the spokesman, this would lead • Eight White M.P.s elected by ratio between White and non- rapidly to a non-White majority Native voters on a separate roll. White representation In Parlia­ in Parliament. There was no Ultimately this number could be ment—until such time as the need way ; out of the Progressive extended by agreement with the for regulation falls away. Party's dilemma. If it kept the other racial groups. Ultimately, present qualifications, the non- too, the M.P.s could be Natives. Native areas Whites would swamp the Whites. 0 An undefined number of If ifr-raised the qualifications, then White M.P.s but not fewer than Some Native areas, such as the the non-Whites would be swamped three, elected by Asian voters. Trapskei, would probably be by the Whites and their vote placed on the same footingfi asd ie H would become meaningless. the provinces. They would havej In terms of United Party limited measure of autonomy policy there might be a qualifi­ and be represented in Parliament cation test for Natives and by M.P.s. Asians, but it would not be an > T h ey would never be indepen­ important test. dent provinces, however. This Each of their groups would is where the United Party’s f plan clashes sharply with the have its own voters’ roll with-a j defined number of constituencies. ! . Government's Bantustan policy. The United Party does not The strength of the Natives jj believe In the "fragmeptisation" and!1 Asians in Parliament would of South Africa. be determined by the number bf Tjje. “provincial” system will these constituencies. also make provision for the pos­ The United Party, It Is sible Inclusion of territories like ^_ ted, believes that the Native Southern Rhodesia. population must be given eight (See "Astonishing reaction toj a «eats in the House of Assembly lediately. Initially these T.P. plan,” Page 4; and “There’s ts would be occupied by hope in the U.P. programme,” W hite M.P.s. Page 14). The spokesman explained .that no change* In the number of Native M.P.s could be brought about without a referendum of. — 174 MAIN STREET, r n m t s JOHANNESBURG. DECEMBER 10, 1961. THE PAPER FOR THE PEOPLE A CLEAR POLICY HE United Party’s policy for a Federa­ as restoring the rights of the Coloured T tion of Races, set out in the SUNDAY people' and giving the Natives represen­ TIMES last'week by Mr. Marais Steyn tation in Parliament. Those phases would M.P., has made a tremendous impact be concurrent, and would pave the way for throughout South Africa. the final phase, the Federation of the One curious reaction — and it comes Races. from the right wing Nationalists as well In this Federation, all races will share; as fr,om the leftist Progressives----is that The Federation Plan, which has an imme­ the United Party's Federation is some­ diate and dynamic appeal as providing thing -new, and that it represents a sudden the best solution to our complex racial move or swing to the left. problems, rests upon two concepts of pro­ Nothing could be further from the found importance: truth. There has been no change in United 1. Federation gives the non-Whites an Party policy, which was announced long opportunity to govern themselves abso­ ago. Nevertheless, there is a difference — lutely in matters that concern them alone; not in the policy itself (which is at the same time it gives them the chance unchanged) — but in the manner in which to share directly, through their own repre­ it is being presented to the people. The sentatives, in the Federal Government of United Party’s Federation plan is being South Africa. expressed with a directness and a clarity 2. Federation, which is the alternative that did not exist before. to apartheid, is also the only alternative That is the difference. The policy is to apartheid that preserves and maintains the same; the manner of its presentation the civilised standards brought to South has been immeasurably improved? Africa by its White inhabitants. The United Party has much to reproach That is where Federation differs itself for because it did not present its radically from Progressive Party’s inte­ views more clearly in the past. For that gration policy. The cornerstone upon omission it has suffered; and it has no one which Federation rests is that the position to blame but itself. But it does not intend of the Whites shall be guaranteed. Pro­ to make the same mistake again. Mr. gressive policy, on the other hand, deliber­ Marais Steyn’s statement in the SUNDAY ately creates conditions which will sub­ TIMES last week is evidence of a new merge the Whites in a Black sea. determination to ensure that United Party The United Party’s Federation of the policy will be made known and understood, Races offers South Africa the solution it beyond doubt or dispute. has long been seeking — a shared society, Indeed, the better the Federation Plan with a place in the Government for its is understood, the more the United Party non-Whites, and with the Federal control will benefit, for it is plain that the United placed firmly m—the hands of civilised Party's multi-racial plan is the only one men.
Recommended publications
  • Military Conscription in South Africa, 1952-1972
    Scientia Militaria, South African Journal of Military Studies, Vol 35, Nr 1, 2007. doi: 10.5787/35-1-29 46 PATRIOTIC DUTY OR RESENTED IMPOSITION? PUBLIC REACTIONS TO MILITARY CONSCRIPTION IN WHITE SOUTH AFRICA, 1952-1972 __________________________________ Graeme Callister Department of History, University of Stellenbosch1 Introduction It is widely known that from the introduction of the Defence Amendment Act of 1967 (Act no. 85 of 1967) until the fall of apartheid in 1994, South Africa had a system of universal national service for white males, and that the men conscripted into the South African Defence Force (SADF) under this system were engaged in conflicts in Namibia, Angola, and later in the townships of South Africa itself. What is widely ignored however, both in academia and in wider society, is that the South African military relied on conscripts, selected through a ballot system, to fill its ranks for some fifteen years before the introduction of universal service. This article intends to redress this scholastic imbalance. The period of universal military service coincides with the period that saw South Africa in the world’s spotlight, when defeating apartheid was the great crusade in which capitalist and communist alike could engage. It is therefore not surprising that the military of that era has also been studied. Post-1967 universal national service in South Africa has received some attention from scholars, and is generally portrayed as a resented imposition at best. Resistance to conscription is widely covered, especially through the 1980s when organisations such as the Conscientious Objectors Support Group (COSG, formed in 1980) and the End Conscription Campaign (ECC, formed in 1983) gave a more public ‘face’ to the anti-conscription movement.2 However, as can be seen from the relatively late 1 I would like to extend my gratitude to Professor Albert Grundlingh of the University of Stellenbosch for his comments and advice on the first draft of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to KPMG Crescent
    Jan Smuts Ave St Andrews M1 Off Ramp Winchester Rd Jan Smuts Off Ramp Welcome to KPMGM27 Crescent M1 North On Ramp De Villiers Graaff Motorway (M1) 85 Empire Road, Parktown St Andrews Rd Albany Rd GPS Coordinates Latitude: -26.18548 | Longitude: 28.045142 85 Empire Road, Johannesburg, South Africa M1 B M1 North On Ramp Directions: From Sandton/Pretoria M1 South Take M1 (South) towards Johannesburg On Ramp Jan Smuts / Take Empire off ramp, at the robot turn left to the KPMG main St Andrews gate. (NB – the Empire entrance is temporarily closed). Continue Off Ramp to Jan Smuts Avenue, turn left and then first left into entrance on Empire Jan Smuts. M1 Off Ramp From South of JohannesburgWellington Rd /M2 Sky Bridge 4th Floor Take M1 (North) towards Sandton/Pretoria Take Exit 14A for Jan Smuts Avenue toward M27 and turn right M27 into Jan Smuts. At Empire Road turn right, at first traffic lights M1 South make a U-turn and travel back on Empire, and left into Jan Smuts On Ramp M17 Jan Smuts Ave Avenue, and first left into entrance. Empire Rd KPMG Entrance KPMG Entrance temporarily closed Off ramp On ramp T: +27 (0)11 647 7111 Private Bag 9, Jan Jan Smuts Ave F: +27 (0)11 647 8000 Parkview, 2122 E m p ire Rd Welcome to KPMG Wanooka Place St Andrews Rd, Parktown NORTH GPS Coordinates Latitude: -26.182416 | Longitude: 28.03816 St Andrews Rd, Parktown, Johannesburg, South Africa M1 St Andrews Off Ramp Jan Smuts Ave Directions: Winchester Rd From Sandton/Pretoria Take M1 (South) towards Johannesburg Take St Andrews off ramp, at the robot drive straight to the KPMG Jan Smuts main gate.
    [Show full text]
  • The White Opposition Splits
    12 THE WHITE OPPOSITION SPLITS STANLEY UYS Political Correspondent of the 'Sunday Times1 THE annual congress of the official South African Parliamentary Opposition or United Party in August last year, on the eve of the Provincial Elections, resulted in the resignation of almost a quarter of its Members of Parliament and the formation of a new white political party—the Progressives. Amidst the exhuma­ tions and excuses, analyses and adjustments that followed, two highly significant conclusions emerged—the official Parliamentary Opposition has swung substantially to the right, narrowing the already narrow gap between Government and United Party on the doctrines of race rule; and, for the first time in South African history, a substantial white Parliamentary Party with wide, if not dominant, electoral support in many urban areas, had come into existence specifically in order to propagate a more liberal policy in race relations. The origin of the Progressive break must be sought in the right-wing ''rethinking" resulting from the total failure of the United Party to avoid a steady electoral decline during the n years in which it has been in Opposition. In 1948, the Nationalist Party came to power with a majority of fewer than half-a-dozen M.P.s. Today, it has two-thirds of the House of Assembly, partly due to the completely one-sided character of the electoral system (particularly delimitation methods) and partly to the growing numerical superiority of the Afrikaner. It did not take the United Party long to evolve the view that there was no profit in battering its head against a stone wall, and that the only chance of success lay in winning over "moderate'' Nationalist voters.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Progressive Federal Party, 1981 - 1989
    STRUCTURAL CRISIS AND LIBERALISM: A HISTORY OF THE PROGRESSIVE FEDERAL PARTY, 1981 - 1989 DAVID SHANDLER Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Economic History, Faculty of Arts, University of Cape Town, January 1991 The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. .ABSTRACT Whereas an extensive literature has developed on the broad conditions of crisis in South Africa in the seventies and eighties, and on the dynamic of state and popular responses to it, little focus has fallen .on the reactions . of the other key elements among the dominating classes. It is the aim of this dissertation to attempt to address an aspect of this lacuna by focussing on the Progressive Federal Party's responses from 1981 until 1989. The thesis develops an understanding of the period as one entailing conditions of organ.le crisis. It attempts to show the PFP' s behaviour in the context of structural and conjunctural crises. The thesis periodises the Party's policy and strategic responses and makes an effort to show its contradictory nature. An effort is made to understand this contradictory character in terms of the party's class location with respect to the white dominating classes and leading elements within it; in relation to the black dominated classes; as well as in terms of the liberal tradition within which the Party operated.
    [Show full text]
  • A1132-Ba2-002-Jpeg.Pdf
    - ■ m m m Two-voice plan bristles with contradictions N the first two articles I either individuals or racial be shared with all those non- wrote that United Party groups, and apart from a brief Europeans who have shown that I reference to what was clearly they have the capacity to take speakers often contradict joint responsibility with us for each other and even them­ meant as safeguards between the future development of selves in their statements on the two White sections and South Afriea.” ("Weekblad,” which was made in the "Ordered 1 7 . 3 . 6 1 . ) COUNTS v> their race federation plan. In the tame speech the Advance” pamphlet issued by OLITICAL parties, more | Those contradictions are no leader of the United Party doubt an indication that the Sir De Villiers Graaff on Oc­ than most other organisa- S tober 25, 1960, I could find little went on to say: "W e want j P! tions of people, reflect the whole plan was rather hur­ them (the Africans) to be re­ W , i riedly conceived and pre­ or no reference to constitutional , quality of human material safeguards in United Party presented by eight European \ j they embody. In other words maturely horn and that the members, elected by those I good people tend to make for f leaders of the United Party policy. Natives who have shown them- ■ | a good party, indifferent j have not even considered Nevertheless the United selves to be responsible citi­ people for an indifferent party, ï certain vital aspects of their Party has as its main policy plank, the safeguarding of zens of our country." But ham and bad people for a bad party.
    [Show full text]
  • The Preview Edition [PDF] Here
    Humanistic Judaism Magazine Helen Suzman 2021–2022 Humanistic Jewish Role Model Diagnosis: Casteism by Rabbi Jeffrey Falick Challenging the Phrase "Judeo-Christian Values" by Lincoln Dow A Woman of Valor for the Ages by Marilyn Boxer Community News and much more Spring 2021 Table of Contents From the Editor Tributes, Board of Directors, p. 3 Communities p. 21–22 Humanism Can Lead to the Future Acceptance of Tolerance and Human Unity p. 4, 20 Contributors I Marilyn J. Boxer is secretary and program co-chair at by Professor Mike Whitty Kol Hadash in Berkeley, California. She is also professor emerita of history and former vice-president/provost at San Helen Suzman Francisco State University. p. 5–6 I Lincoln Dow is the Community Organizer of Jews for a Secular Democracy, a pluralistic initiative of the Society for A Woman of Valor for the Ages Humanistic Judaism. He studies politics and public policy by Marilyn Boxer at New York University. I Rachel Dreyfus is the Partnership & Events Coordinator “I Was Just Doing My Job” for the Connecticut CHJ. I Jeffrey Falick is the Rabbi of The Birmingham Temple, p. 7–8 Congregation for Humanistic Judaism. Interviews with Paul Suzman and Frances Suzman Jowell I K. Healan Gaston is Lecturer on American Religious by Dan Pine History and Ethics at Harvard Divinity School and the author of Imagining Judeo-Christian America: Religion, Imagining Judeo-Christian America Secularism, and the Redefinition of Democracy (University of Chicago Press, 2019). She is currently completing p. 9, 18 Beyond Prophetic Pluralism: Reinhold and H. Richard Book Excerpt by K.
    [Show full text]
  • Colin Eglin, the Progressive Federal Party and the Leadership of the Official Parliamentary Opposition, 1977‑1979 and 1986‑1987
    Journal for Contemporary History 40(1) / Joernaal vir Eietydse Geskiedenis 40(1): 1‑22 © UV/UFS • ISSN 0285‑2422 “ONE OF THE ARCHITECTS OF OUR DEMOCRACY”: COLIN EGLIN, THE PROGRESSIVE FEDERAL PARTY AND THE LEADERSHIP OF THE OFFICIAL PARLIAMENTARY OPPOSITION, 1977‑1979 AND 1986‑1987 FA Mouton1 Abstract The political career of Colin Eglin, leader of the Progressive Federal Party (PFP) and the official parliamentary opposition between 1977‑1979 and 1986‑1987, is proof that personality matters in politics and can make a difference. Without his driving will and dogged commitment to the principles of liberalism, especially his willingness to fight on when all seemed lost for liberalism in the apartheid state, the Progressive Party would have floundered. He led the Progressives out of the political wilderness in 1974, turned the PFP into the official opposition in 1977, and picked up the pieces after Frederik van Zyl Slabbert’s dramatic resignation as party leader in February 1986. As leader of the parliamentary opposition, despite the hounding of the National Party, he kept liberal democratic values alive, especially the ideal of incremental political change. Nelson Mandela described him as, “one of the architects of our democracy”. Keywords: Colin Eglin; Progressive Party; Progressive Federal Party; liberalism; apartheid; National Party; Frederik van Zyl Slabbert; leader of the official parliamentary opposition. Sleutelwoorde: Colin Eglin; Progressiewe Party; Progressiewe Federale Party; liberalisme; apartheid; Nasionale Party; Frederik van Zyl Slabbert; leier van die amptelike parlementêre opposisie. 1. INTRODUCTION The National Party (NP) dominated parliamentary politics in the apartheid state as it convinced the majority of the white electorate that apartheid, despite the destruction of the rule of law, was a just and moral policy – a final solution for the racial situation in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Section 18A Approved PBO's V1 0 7 Jan 04
    List of Public Benefit Organisations (PBO) approved in terms of section 18A of the Income Tax Act as at 31 December 2003: Name of PBO: Exemption Application No: 46664 Concerts 930004984 Aandmymering ACVV Tehuis Bejaardes 18/11/13/2738 ABC Kleuterskool 930005938 Abraham Kriel Maria Kloppers Children's Home 18/11/13/1444 Abri Foundation Charitable Trust 18/11/13/2950 Access College 930000702 ACVV Aberdeen 930010293 ACVV Aberdeen Aalwyn Ouetehuis 930010021 ACVV Adcock/van der Vyver Behuisingskema 930010259 ACVV Albertina 930009888 ACVV Alexandra 930009955 ACVV Baakensvallei Sentrum 930006889 ACVV Bothasig Creche Dienstak 930009637 ACVV Bredasdorp 930004489 ACVV Britstown 930009496 ACVV Britstown Huis Daniel 930010753 ACVV Calitzdorp 930010761 ACVV Calvinia 930010018 ACVV Carnarvon 930010546 ACVV Ceres 930009817 ACVV Colesberg 930010535 ACVV Cradock 930009918 ACVV Creche Prieska 930010756 ACVV Danielskuil 930010531 ACVV De Aar 930010545 ACVV De Grendel Versorgingsoord 930010401 ACVV Delft Versorgingsoord 930007024 ACVV Dienstak Bambi Versorgingsoord 930010453 ACVV Disa Tehuis Tulbach 930010757 ACVV Dolly Vermaak 930010184 ACVV Dysseldorp 930009423 ACVV Elizabeth Roos Tehuis 930010596 ACVV Franshoek 930010755 ACVV George 930009501 ACVV Graaff Reinet 930009885 ACVV Graaff Reinet Huis van de Graaff 930009898 ACVV Grabouw 930009818 ACVV Haas Das Care Centre 930010559 ACVV Heidelberg 930009913 ACVV Hester Hablutsel Versorgingsoord Dienstak 930007027 ACVV Hoofbestuur Nauursediens vir Kinderbeskerming 930010166 ACVV Huis Spes Bona 930010772 ACVV
    [Show full text]
  • Johannes De Villiers Graaff1 Johannes De Villiers Graaff, Known
    Johannes de Villiers Graaff1 Johannes de Villiers Graaff, known more simply as Jan Graaff, shared with that other great son of the Boland, JM Coetzee, the somewhat terrifying power of silent authority which comes from that mixture of brilliant intelligence combined with surprising shyness. Small talk was not part of his character and he could be a highly intimidating presence to those who met him. But for those, family and friends, who got to know him, he was a warm and wonderful human being and could be a great storyteller. Once, when he was trapped in a window seat on a flight to London and I was in the aisle, I was able to ask him a lot of questions which he could not escape, so I learnt a good deal. Why, for example, was he (whom we lesser mortals all knew to be the greatest economist that South Africa had produced and who loved his discipline) not willing to join the faculty of one of our universities to teach students? His answer was that he had tried teaching in Cambridge and in Harvard but had decided that the internecine departmental politics that he encountered was so offensive that he resolved never to spend his working life in such an environment. And so, Paul Samuelson from MIT, writing in the pages of the Economic Journal in September 1958 when Jannie Graaff was only 30 but had already decided to leave academia, lamented that “economics has lost so able a mind”. Joan Robinson said that he was the brightest PhD student that Cambridge had ever had.
    [Show full text]
  • OD Section (Pdf)
    ARE YOU ELIGIBLE FOR A BRITISH PASSPORT? If a parent or grandparent was born in the UK, Ireland or outside of South Africa, then you or your children may qualify for British Nationality. We are the world’s leading experts in UK immigration and nationality. Since 1992, we have helped thousands of South Africans navigate the complex path to British citizenship. Call one of our nationality advisors to find out whether you or your children qualify. e: [email protected] | UK: +44 (0) 207 759 7581 | SA: 021 657 2139 www.philipgamble.co.uk 573560 PG Blue Sky Advert A5.indd 1 2/13/2015 2:01:30 PM June 2015 OD Union 113 OLD DIOCESANS UNION 50 Year Reunion CONTENTS ROLL OF HONOUR 114 NOTES FROM OD UNION OFFICE 117 SOCIAL REGISTER Visitors, births, engagements, marriages, wedding anniversaries and octogenerians 124 OBITUARIES 129 NEWS OF ODs 143 OD UNION SPOrt 151 Class reunions 162 MUSEUM & ARCHIVES 172 OD AGM 173 114 OD Union June 2015 ROLL OF HONOUR Their name liveth for ever In June we remember: THE GREAT WAR 1914-1919 Lawrence (‘Laurie’) Anderson (1909-15) Lieut, RFC. Flanders, 11 June 1917 Gordon Bayley (1902-08) Lieut, Royal Flying Corps. France, June 1914 Edward Bramley (1888-89) Lieut, NLC. France, June 1921 Robert Hunter (1900-07) Lieut, 1st King Edward’s Force. June 1920 Percy Johnstone (1906-08) Trooper. Died of wounds in East Africa, June 1916 Harry Lee (1902-03) Lieut Irish Guards. Died of wounds in France, 18 June 1916 Archibald Mansfield (1902-05) Pvt, 1st SA Infantry.
    [Show full text]
  • NC79 December 2017 Edition.Indb
    New Contree, No. 79, December 2017, Book Reviews, pp. 184-197 Die slotbeskouing van die boek is geskryf deur Mamokgethi Setati Phakeng van die Universiteit van Kaapstad. Sy het die hoop uitgespreek dat die boek Good Hope “is the start of a new way of representing the ties between the Netherlands and South Africa … (and that) we can look forward to tracing South African tracks in Dutch culture, political economy and science”. Sy meld dat baie van die bydraes in die boek gefokus het op die impak van Ned- erland op Suid-Afrika. Sy sou graag wou sien dat daar meer aandag geskenk word aan Suid-Afrikaanse invloed op Nederland. Good Hope is ’n baie besondere boek, veral omdat dit die geskiedenis lewen- dig en aanskoulik voorstel. Aan die einde van die boek is daar 20 bladsye inligting oor endnote, ’n uitgebreide bronnelys, ook wat al die illustrasies betref. Bondige inligting oor al die outeurs word ook verskaf. Die boek word van harte aanbeveel vir almal wat in Nederlands-Suid-Afrikaanse betrekkinge belangstel. Iron in the soul: The leaders of the official parliamentary opposition in South Africa, 1910-1993 (Pretoria, Protea Book House, 2017, 224 pp. ISBN 978-1-4853-0550-7) FA Mouton Charmaine T Hlongwane North-West University [email protected] FA Mouton is a renowned historian who has written extensively about South African political history and Afrikaner nationalism. In his recent book Iron in the soul: Leaders of the official parliamentary opposition in South Africa,he analyses the careers of official opposition leaders in the South African parlia- ment between 1910 and 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Hertzog's “Calvinist Speech” and the Verlig
    62 AUTHOR: ALBERT HERTZOG’S “CALVINIST Weronika Muller1 AFFILIATION: SPEECH” AND THE VERLIG- 1Doctoral student, VERKRAMPSTRYD: THE ORIGINS Department of History, OF THE RIGHT-WING MOVEMENT University of South Africa IN SOUTH AFRICA EMAIL: [email protected] DOI: https://dx.doi. ABSTRACT org/10.18820/24150509/ SJCH46.v1.4 This article analyses the role Dr Albert Hertzog, an ultra- conservative Afrikaner Nationalist, played in the formation ISSN 0258-2422 (Print) of South Africa’s right-wing movement. It focuses on ISSN 2415-0509 (Online) his “Calvinist speech” of 1969 due to its historical Southern Journal for significance for the unity of the National Party (NP) and as a broad summary of Hertzog’s personal opinion Contemporary History on the politics of South Africa. The speech contrasted 2021 46(1):62-85 liberal English with Calvinistic Afrikaners and concluded that only an Afrikaner true to Calvinistic principles could PUBLISHED: succeed in leading the nation through the perilous times 23 July 2021 they were facing. This opinion was considered offensive to the English population as well as to “enlightened” Nationalists like the Prime Minister, John Vorster. The article will examine how the controversy surrounding the speech precipitated a split in the NP; those expelled formed a right-wing party that failed to gain considerable support. When apartheid was being dismantled in the early 1990s, the movement did not pose a serious threat to the ruling party despite vows that Afrikaners would never surrender their power but rather fight to the bitter end. The failure of these ultra-conservatives originated in the verlig-verkrampstryd of the 1960s, in which Hertzog played a significant role.
    [Show full text]