DOCSLIB.ORG

In Defense of Netanyahu: Appalling, Yes. Racist, No Gil Troy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In Defense of Netanyahu: Appalling, Yes. Racist, No Gil Troy 24 Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in his Joint Address to the US Congress on March 3. The timing of the speech, just two weeks before the Israeli elections, and at the invitation of Republican Congressional leaders rather than President Obama, was another sore point between Netanyahu and Obama. Photo by Caleb Smith In Defense of Netanyahu: Appalling, Yes. Racist, No Gil Troy On March 17th, Israelis elected Prime Minister Benja- inally, after decades in political min Netanyahu to a third consecutive term, his fourth exile, Israel’s Labor Party is back. F Isaac Herzog’s shrewd alliance term in the office. The results came after a stunning with Tzipi Livni helped him boost his pre-vote video intervention by Netanyahu to mobilize party’s popularity and its number of right-wing voters, one that drew criticism internation- Knesset seats, catapulting it over its ally and aggravated tensions in the Israel-US relation- closest rival. ship. Historian and political observer Gil Troy defends These two sentences, which most jour- nalists covering Israel expected to write Netanyahu, arguing that while his Election Day com- after the mid-March elections, are still ment was appalling, it was not racist. true. When the campaign started, the Labor Party was Israel’ number three party. In its election-time-incarnation as the Zionist Union, it enjoyed a surge Policy 25 of popularity on Election Day, by- passing Yair Lapid’s second-place Just as the pre-election story prematurely predicting Yesh Atid Party. But, of course, Israeli Bibi’s imminent demise was incorrect, the post- Prime Minister Benjamin “Bibi” Ne- election story of a “racist” Israel marching in lockstep to tanyahu enjoyed a bigger surge, de- Netanyahu’s demagogic appeals to give him a landslide is fying the pollsters and pundits, win- ning re-election. also flawed. Just as the pre-election story prema- turely predicting Bibi’s imminent de- mise was incorrect, the post-election nibalizing the far-right parties, all of Let’s admit. It’s messy. To Israelis, story of a “racist” Israel marching in whom shrank, while the yahoo Ya- “Arabs” means fellow citizens who lockstep to Netanyahu’s demagogic had Party disappeared. Overall, the deserve respect as well as the enemy appeals to give him a landslide is also right-wing parties lost one Knesset who triggers fears. Arabs have mur- flawed. Yes, in the last few days be- seat. Netanyhau’s natural allies in the dered thousands of Jews over de- fore the election on March 17, with greatly diminished National Religious cades. Not every Arab is a terrorist, his poll numbers tanking, Netan- Bayit Hayehudi and the Russian-im- but almost every anti-Israel terrorist yahu veered right rhetorically. And migrant Yisrael Beiteinu, are furious is an Arab—that complicates matters, on Election Day, he posted a video at him for hijacking their voters. The without justifying hatred. Every day, on Facebook saying: “Arab voters are Zionist Union, Yesh Atid and Kulanu, anti-Semitic calls for Israel’s destruc- heading to the polling stations in all to Netanyhua’s left, together won tion emanate from the Arab press droves. Left-wing NGOs are bringing 45 seats to Likud’s 30, representing and especially from Palestinian soci- them in buses.” Lo and behold, right- the powerful Israeli center. ety, sometimes illustrated with crude wing voters “head[ed] to the polling anti-Semitic caricatures. Some radical stations in droves,” with a late-night Second, and perhaps most explosive, Arabs in the Knesset regularly (and boost for Bibi that even confounded Netanyahu’s comment was appall- freely) denounce the country that exit pollsters because their first cal- ing—and I have repeatedly criticized pays their salaries. And in a society culation was true as of two-hours be- it—but it was not racist. Netan- where leftists frequently condemn fore the polls closed and the election yahu’s statement began by saying “the ultra-Orthodox” for acting shifted in those final minutes. “the right-wing government is in democratically, including “voting in danger.” And this most effective, droves,” Netanyahu’s cry about Arabs was unworthy, ugly, and tribal but First, Israel did not harmful, and now famous 29-sec- ond video did not end with the line not racist and accurate in that they shift rightward, about the buses. Netanyahu added, truly were voting against him, and Israel’s Right reshuffled. “Friends, we don’t have a V15.” This focused on politics. overlooked line puts Netanyahu’s Netanyahu won merely 25 This row about “racism” upstaged comments in the context of a hard- percent of the electorate. what should have been one of the fought campaign he was desperate And he eked out his small headlines of election day, the very to win—and his opponents were day Netanyahu behaved so poorly: showing only by desperate to win, too. V15 was a cannibalizing the far-right Israel remains a remarkably inclusive grassroots, anti-Bibi initiative that and pluralistic place, not a racist na- parties, all of whom shrank, gained much traction during the tion. An Israeli Arab, the Supreme while the yahoo Yahad Party campaign—and, as a nonpartisan Court Justice Salim Joubran, super- disappeared. project could accept funding from vised the elections. Joubran went on foreign donors. This fed into Likud radio, with reverence in his voice, to fears about foreign-funded “Left- declare Election Day, “an Israeli dem- wing NGOs” trying to manipulate ocratic Holy Day.” After the election, the election. In Israel, the foreign- Still, the three conventional take- Israel’s President Reuben Rivlin—a funding charge is a red herring. Both aways about “a Bibi landslide,” a right-winger who regularly reaches the Left and the Right raise money “racist Israel,” and a failed Zionist out to his fellow citizens be they Arab from abroad while bashing their re- Union campaign are all wrong. or Jewish—to request Justice Jou- spective rivals for accepting money bran’s permission to initiate coalition irst, Israel did not shift right- from abroad. Still, mentioning V15 discussions early. Such everyday oc- ward, Israel’s Right reshuffled. in particular politicized Netanyahu’s currences, where Arabs wield power F Netanyahu won merely 25 per- remarks. He was saying, “our politi- or achieve high status, didn’t make cent of the electorate. And he eked cal enemies are massing against us, headlines in Israel because they are out his small showing only by can- we must mobilize.” so commonplace. May/June 2015 26 Ultimately, while it is very difficult While it is very stakes are so high. As an adolescent to predict Israel’s future, this elec- democracy, founded in 1948, popu- tion may have heralded the start of difficult to predict lated by refugees from Eastern Europe, the post-Netanyahu Era. Bibi fatigue Israel’s future, this election North Africa, and the Middle East was genuine and widespread, while may have heralded the start with no real democratic tradition, Is- Bibi genuinely seemed fatigued. And, of the post-Netanyahu Era. raeli democracy is still evolving—and although it did not win, the Zionist sometimes learning the worst habits Union emerged as an effective oppo- Bibi fatigue was genuine from older democratic siblings like the sition led by a true leader and com- and widespread, while Bibi United States which freely exports its mitted democrat, Isaac Herzog. If genuinely seemed fatigued. political consultants and attack ads, Herzog remains strong in opposition, And, although it did not among other delights. Still, Israel, for he may prove to be the anti-Bibi, all its flaws, shares with Canada, the keeping Bibi in check as long as this win, the Zionist Union United States, and the other Western government lasts, and ready to take emerged as an effective democracies, these remarkable, near- over, next time Bibi falters big time. opposition led by a true magical mechanisms for self-correc- leader and committed tion of free institutions, including free Meantime, all Israelis, left and right elections. In building his coalition, need to unite, as Iran rushes to go nu- democrat, Isaac Herzog. seeking at least 61 votes he needed for clear, Hamas and Hezbollah accumu- a parliamentary majority, Netanyahu late rockets faster than big gamblers once again did what he and Israel do accumulate debt, Mahmoud Abbas to Obama’s tentative agreement with so frequently—demonstrating democ- and the Palestinian leadership con- Iran over nuclear technology. racy’s and his society’s many strengths tinue to bash Israel while demanding and weaknesses, while never, ever be- Israel collect tax revenue, the gap be- And social tensions grow, heightened ing boring. tween rich and poor grows, prominent by Bibi’s very election, as well as the pols face corruption charges, Barack usual, instinctive, yet still reprehen- Contributing Writer Gil Troy is a Obama continues to distance himself sible anti-Israel backlash. Professor of History at McGill University. from Bibi—never have an American His 10th book, Moynihan’s Moment: president and an Israeli prime min- Although professors have long joked America’s Fight Against Zionism ister been so far apart. Their differ- that academic politics are so intense as Racism, recently won the J.I. Segal ences have already been exacerbated because the stakes are so low, in Israel Award for Best Jewish Non-Fiction Book by Netanyahu’s obvious opposition the politics are so intense because the for 2014. [email protected] ADVOCACY RESEARCH & ANALYSIS EVENTS & COMMUNICATIONS OTTAWA | TORONTO | MONTREAL www.capitalhill.ca creating government relations campaigns with impact since 1985 Policy .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Search of the Center
    In Search of the Center By Dahlia Scheindlin After the Second Intifada (2000-2005), Israel appeared to be hurtling towards rightwing politics with no end in sight. From 2009, the towering figurehead of the right, Benjamin Netanyahu, won election after election. As public sentiment veered to the right, parties competed for extreme nationalist and expansionist policies, and there seemed to be no stopping the trend. Yet the party that finally came close to beating Netanyahu in April 2019, then surpassed Likud in a second round in September that year, was not a competitor from the right but a rival from the Israeli center. Blue and White was an unlikely challenger. The party was cobbled together ad hoc ahead of the April 2019 elections, led by three former generals with no obvious political ideology, party institutions or base of support beyond the voters of one of the constituent parties in its joint slate, Yesh Atid. The latter was largely viewed as center-left. Yet somehow, voters knew instinctively where Blue and White fit on Israel’s map – the center. The party’s own leaders worked hard to convey a centrist image as their brand, as well. But do centrist political movements ever succeed in Israel? Can a centrist party become a defining force of Israeli politics, and if so, what exactly does centrism mean in Israel? The Pull of the Center On the face of it, centrist politics sound like a potential antidote to Israel’s notoriously polarized, fragmented, and aggressive political culture. A center party could become a vehicle to promote moderation and pragmatic policies, in theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom in the World 2019
    Freedom in the World 2019 https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/israel A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 12 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 A largely ceremonial president is elected by the Knesset for one seven-year term. In 2014, Reuven Rivlin of the right-leaning Likud party was elected to replace outgoing president Shimon Peres, receiving 63 votes in a runoff against Meir Sheetrit of the centrist Hatnuah party. The prime minister is usually the leader of the largest faction in the Knesset. In 2014, in a bid to create more stable governing coalitions, the electoral threshold for parties to win representation was raised from 2 percent to 3.25 percent, and the no- confidence procedure was revised so that opponents hoping to oust a sitting government must simultaneously vote in a new one. The incumbent prime minister in 2018, Benjamin Netanyahu of the conservative party Likud, had been in office since 2009, most recently securing reelection after the 2015 parliamentary polls. A2. Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 Members of the 120-seat Knesset are elected by party-list proportional representation for four-year terms, and elections are typically free and fair. In the 2015 contest, Likud secured 30 seats, followed by the center-left Zionist Union with 24. The Joint List—a coalition of parties representing Arab citizens of Israel, who often identify as Palestinian—earned 13 seats; the centrist Yesh Atid (There Is a Future), 11; Kulanu, also centrist, 10; Habayit Hayehudi (Jewish Home), 8; the ultra- Orthodox parties Shas and United Torah Judaism, 7 and 6, respectively; the right- wing Yisrael Beiteinu, 6; and the left-wing Meretz party, 5.
    [Show full text]
  • S Election Results
    The Challenge of Israel’s Election Results I wrote the following for the latest newsletter of the World Union of Meretz, from the J Street Conference in Washington, DC. Representatives of all of the Israeli opposition gathered there, meeting together with its counterparts from American Jewry, who clearly represent the majority of American Jews. The final polls allowed on Friday the 13th, four days before election day, had given the Zionist Union (Labor & Hatnua) led by Herzog and Livni a lead of 24 to 20 seats, with an even chance to lead the next government. Netanyahu then went into emergency mode, using every demagogic trick in the book to turn the results around. He warned the leadership of the settlers that “the left” was on the verge of winning, and would begin to evacuate settlements, so they mobilized en masse, coming in thousands to Likud strongholds in the outlying and development towns to get out the vote. Mobilizing the extreme right to abandon Naftali Bennet’s Jewish Home party, Lieberman’s Yisrael Beiteinu and the ultra-right Yachad party (led by Shas refugee Eli Yishai in alliance with Kahanist Baruch Marzel), Netanyahu renounced his support for a two-state solution, and on election day warned that Israeli Arabs were voting in droves, being “bussed in by Jewish left-wingers” supported by foreign money. This last claim was ridiculous, since Israeli Arab citizens were simply walking to the polling booths, exercising their democratic right to vote, and energized by the fact that the four Arab parties had united in a Joint Arab List to ensure that they would pass the minimum voter threshold that had been raised to try to prevent them from entering the Knesset.
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019
    WID.world WORKING PAPER N° 2020/17 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019 Yonatan Berman August 2020 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949{2019 Yonatan Berman∗ y August 20, 2020 Abstract This paper draws on pre- and post-election surveys to address the long run evolution of vot- ing patterns in Israel from 1949 to 2019. The heterogeneous ethnic, cultural, educational, and religious backgrounds of Israelis created a range of political cleavages that evolved throughout its history and continue to shape its political climate and its society today. De- spite Israel's exceptional characteristics, we find similar patterns to those found for France, the UK and the US. Notably, we find that in the 1960s{1970s, the vote for left-wing parties was associated with lower social class voters. It has gradually become associated with high social class voters during the late 1970s and later. We also find a weak inter-relationship between inequality and political outcomes, suggesting that despite the social class cleavage, identity-based or \tribal" voting is still dominant in Israeli politics. Keywords: Political cleavages, Political economy, Income inequality, Israel ∗London Mathematical Laboratory, The Graduate Center and Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality, City University of New York, [email protected] yI wish to thank Itai Artzi, Dror Feitelson, Amory Gethin, Clara Mart´ınez-Toledano, and Thomas Piketty for helpful discussions and comments, and to Leah Ashuah and Raz Blanero from Tel Aviv-Yafo Municipality for historical data on parliamentary elections in Tel Aviv.
    [Show full text]
  • “It's the National Ethos, Stupid”! – Understanding the Political
    International Journal of Social Science Studies Vol. 4, No. 7; July 2016 ISSN 2324-8033 E-ISSN 2324-8041 Published by Redfame Publishing URL: http://ijsss.redfame.com “It’s the National Ethos, Stupid”! – Understanding the Political Psychology of the Israeli 2015 Elections Using Data from the National Resilience Survey Eyal Lewin1 1Ariel University, Israel. Correspondence: Eyal Lewin, Ariel University, Israel. Received: May 9, 2016 Accepted: May 26, 2016 Available online: May 31, 2016 doi:10.11114/ijsss.v4i7.1651 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v4i7.1651 Abstract From a socio-political point of view, the results of the Israeli 2015 elections reflect an ongoing stagnation that is described in detail in this research. This stagnation is often explained by theories of social collective identities. However, none of the theories examines how group identities are created. Consequently, this study explains how different forms of national ethos shape political identities and interweave with them. Relying on a wide set of data from the National Resilience Survey launched by the National Security Studies Center at Haifa University, this research examines the way Israeli political parties differ according to voters' attitudes on matters of national ethos. The findings show how opposing parties correspond with the two distinct forms of national ethos. However, the data also reveals that the ethos clash is not necessarily a dichotomy, but rather a continuum where various parties are located along a spectrum between the poles. Keywords: group identity, national ethos, voter behavior, political stagnation, republicanism, liberalism. 1. Introduction A friend of mine called me excitedly on the morning of March 17, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • The Increasingly Polarised and Fragmented Party System in Israel Will Make It Difficult for a Stable Government to Emerge from This Month’S Elections
    blo gs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2013/01/14/israel-elections-2013-israeli-party-system/ The increasingly polarised and fragmented party system in Israel will make it difficult for a stable government to emerge from this month’s elections. Blog Admin Israel’s next parliamentary elections are due to be held on 22 January. As part of EUROPP’s coverage of the European neighbourhood, André Krouwel and Daniel Rajmil give an overview of the country’s highly fragmented party system, noting that the results are likely to be significantly different from those in the last election in 2009. New parties have emerged in the last four years, while the largest party in the current parliament, Kadima, could well lose all of its seats. Of all established democracies, Israel has the highest electoral change per election over the post-war period. Only new democracies in Eastern Europe are more electorally volatile. On average almost a quarter of the Israeli electorate shif ts party allegiance per election. One of the main reasons f or this exceptional electoral volatility is that Israeli elections are held under a system of proportional representation (PR). This means that many political parties will enter the f ray, as it is relatively easy to enter parliament compared to majoritarian electoral systems. Parties will gain a number of seats equal to the proportion of the vote they gained in the election, albeit that Israel has introduced a 2 per cent threshold to avoid too much parliamentary f ragmentation. Nevertheless, over the last decade between 12 and 15 parties entered the Knesset in each election.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel After the 2015 Elections: What Does Netanyahu's Victory Mean for U.S. Policy?
    CRS Insights Israel After the 2015 Elections: What Does Netanyahu's Victory Mean for U.S. Policy? Jim Zanotti, Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs ([email protected], 7-1441) March 24, 2015 (IN10251) The Israeli Knesset elections held on March 17, 2015, were a subject of significant interest for the United States. The leading candidates openly differed on how to manage disagreements with the United States and the international community on various matters, though how that might have translated into substantively different policy stances is unclear. The timing and manner of official Israeli statements and actions influence regional and international attitudes and developments, and may shape how the Obama Administration and Congress work together and with Israel on these issues. Since the beginning of March 2015, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has spoken assertively at a joint meeting of Congress in opposition to the presumed parameters of a possible diplomatic agreement on Iran's nuclear program; appeared to renounce his previously expressed willingness to accept the creation of a Palestinian state, before claiming shortly after the election that he still supports a "two-state solution" in principle but not under current realities; declared that foreign sources were funding and advising Israeli left-leaning and Arab groups in an effort to unseat him, amid evidence of substantial private American support for both Netanyahu's right-of-center Likud party and its main rival—the left-of-center Zionist Union. Likud finished with a six-seat advantage over the Zionist Union, which was particularly striking because Likud had trailed by four seats in final pre-election polls.
    [Show full text]
  • Following Likud's Victory in Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu Faces A
    Following Likud’s victory in Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu faces a challenge to secure a stable coalition blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2015/03/23/following-likuds-victory-in-israel-benjamin-netanyahu-faces-a-challenge-to-secure-a-stable-coalition/ 23/03/2015 Israel held legislative elections on 17 March, with the result producing a victory for incumbent Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party. Abraham Diskin writes on the coalition formation process which will follow the elections. He notes that the most likely outcome is for Netanyahu to attempt to form a coalition of the right which includes the new centrist party Kulanu. In Israel, like in most other multi-party parliamentary systems, the main question that voters face is what governmental coalition is expected following the elections. The political outcome of elections is dictated not only by the voter, but also by the negotiations held between the leaders of the parties that gained representation in the elected parliament. Usually the government is supported in parliamentary systems by the majority of parliament members. In the lack of such a majority the government may face either a vote of no confidence in parliament or inability to implement its policies. Since the first general elections of 1949, Israel has had 33 governments. Many argue that the country switching its government on average every two years is an indication of severe stability and governability problems, but in fact the number of governments reflects in many cases technical and formal reasons and not real political difficulties. Only once, in 1990, has an Israeli cabinet faced a successful no-confidence vote.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections in Israel 2021
    Elections in Israel 2021 7 February, 2021 Israel is scheduled to hold general elections for a new Knesset on March 23, 2021. The elections were triggered automatically when the outgoing Knesset and government did not manage to agree on and pass a budget within the legally required time. See here for a detailed explanation of how Israeli elections work prepared by JFNA’s Israel office. Midnight on February 4, 2021 marked the deadline for all parties to submit their final lists of candidates ahead of Election Day. With that milestone now passed, a clearer picture has emerged of who the leading parties will be and the possible election outcomes. One of the most significant aspects of these elections continues to be the notion of the “electoral threshold.” Under this rule, any party that does not receive at least 3.25% (currently around 130,000 votes) of the national vote is disqualified, and all votes cast for that party are thrown out. With numerous parties polling fairly close to that number, and the overall political map so close, whether or not various parties make it over the 3.25% line will likely determine who emerges from the election with the greatest chance of patching together a coalition and thus forming the new government. Once final results are known, there are currently three scenarios that are most likely to take place: 1. Current Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud, and the other parties that support him, will receive enough support (a majority; 61 or more seats in the 120-seat Knesset) be able to form a government.
    [Show full text]
  • IATF Fact Sheet: Knesset Elections, January 22, 2013
    1 FACT SHEET iataskforce.org Topic: Knesset Elections, January 22, 2013 Updated: June 2014 2013 Election Results The Arab sector had a voter turnout of 56% of the eligible voters, as compared with 63.7% of eligible voters from the population as a whole.2 The number of votes needed for a party to pass the electoral threshold and enter the Knesset was 73,000 in 2013.3 Christian Arabs (mostly in the Northern District) had the highest voter turnout rate at 60.4%, Druze turned out at around the average rate (55.9%), and Bedouins had the lowest rate at 46.9%. Within the Bedouin population, the least likely to vote were residents of unrecognized villages, as 30.4% of eligible voters exercised their right. Voting Results in Arab and Druze Localities in 2009 (18th Knesset) and 2013 (19th Knesset)4 Arab and Jewish-Arab 2009 2013 Parties RA’AM-TA’AL-MADA5 32.1% 32.0% HADASH6 27.5% 23.2% BALAD7 22.3% 21.8% DA’AM8 0.2% 0.2% Totals 82.1% 77.2% 1 Compiled by Prof. Elie Rekhess, Associate Director, Crown Center for Jewish and Israel Studies, Northwestern University 2 Ha'aretz, January 23, 2013. Ynet News, January 22, 2013. 3 Ha'aretz, January 23, 2013. 4 Konrad-Adenauer Center for Jewish-Arab Cooperation “Arab Politics in Israel: The 19th Knesset Elections”,’ volume 3 [Hebrew], 2012. 5 RA’AM-TA’AL-MADA stands for a coalition of the parliamentary faction of the United Arab List (UAL – RA’AM), the Arab Movement for Renewal (AMR –TA’AL) and the Arab Democratic Party (ADP – MADA).
    [Show full text]
  • Elections in Israel : Is Change Possible?
    PERSPECTIVE | FES ISRAEL Elections in Israel Is Change Possible? EYTAN SCHWARTZ March 2015 n As Israel approaches its general elections on March 17, 2015, the biggest question is what type of government will be formed. n The Israeli political system has produced a divided electorate with a variety of me­ dium­sized parties. n For the first time in years, there is a chance for a centrist­left coalition to lead. EYTAN SCHWARTZ | ELECTIONS IN ISRAEL On March 17, 2015, Israeli citizens will exercise their of the state — who has very few executive powers and democratic right and vote for their preferred list of can­ serves mainly a ceremonial role — summons the heads didates for the nation’s parliament, the Knesset, from of all the political parties and consults with them about which the government is formed. Since the foundation whom they want for a coalition and to serve as the next of the State of Israel in 1948, there have been 19 such prime minister. The president then appoints the head of elections; while the term of each Knesset is legally four the party he believes has the highest chances of form­ years, over the past few decades no term has lasted its ing a stable and long­lasting coalition. Historically, this full length, and early elections were called for a variety responsibility has always been delegated to the head of of reasons. the largest party; but the law allows the president to exercise discretion and select another candidate if he This election — the 20th in the history of the state — caught believes that he or she has a higher chance of form­ many by surprise, because few expected that Prime Min­ ing a coalition — a scenario that indeed happened in ister Benyamin Netanyahu would allow the Knesset to 2009, when Netanyahu was asked by then­President dissolve less than two years after it was formed, let alone Shimon Peres to form a government, even though the be the initiator of this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Text
    www.ssoar.info Engraving politics: antagonisms of social protest and peace in 2015; Israeli legislative elections Helled, Alon Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Helled, A. (2017). Engraving politics: antagonisms of social protest and peace in 2015; Israeli legislative elections. Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 17(2), 309-329. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168- ssoar-55884-1 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/1.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/1.0/deed.de Engraving Politics Antagonisms of Social Protest and Peace in 2015 Israeli Legislative Elections ALON HELLED (Università di Torino, Università di Firenze, EHESS, Paris) Introduction Israeli politics has undergone radical changes as a result of both geopolitical contingencies (i.e. the uncertainty regarding the Two-States’ solution) and domestic developments (e.g. political reforms, social welfare, ethno-social cleavages etc.). These have influenced Israel’s “state of mind”, a concept, as vague as it may initially seem, that is far from being novel in either daily or psychological discourse; yet relatively unexplored in political studies. It has been mostly used in constructivist theory as a disposition, produced by opinion\preference formation and socialization; a result of skill developing and political learning, which consists of sensitivity, concern enabling the perception\rating of issues and the targeted identification of problems.
    [Show full text]