DOCSLIB.ORG

Snake River Watershed Conditions Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Snake River Watershed Conditions Report A SNAKE RIVER WATERSHED CONDITIONS REPORT Topical Report RSI-2483 Prepared by Megan Burke Emily Javens RESPEC prepared for Middle-Snake-Tamarac Rivers Watershed District 453 North McKinley Street Warren, Minnesota 56762 February 2015 1935 West County Road B2, Suite 320 Roseville, MN 55113 651.788.7813 Snake River Watershed Conditions Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Snake River Watershed Conditions Report describes the watershed’s physical characteristics, provides an overview of its water resources, and describes current water quality conditions. This includes summarizing water runoff (floods to drought), patterns in water quality, potential stressors to the biological integrity of the waterbodies, and information gaps. The development of the conditions report is the first step in building a Snake River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS). The ultimate goal of the Snake River WRAPS is to develop and implement strategies to protect waters where conditions meet water quality standards and to restore waters that are impaired. This report and subsequent WRAPS will provide additional knowledge and tools for balancing the needs of intense land uses (agriculture and urban development), including flood reduction with the preserving of ecological functions via watershed-based approaches. Located in the Red River of the North Basin in northwestern Minnesota, the Snake River and Middle River Watersheds drain an area of 611,800 acres (or approximately 956 square miles). The Snake River flow network includes two converging rivers, with the Middle River flowing to the west across the northern portion and joining the Snake River and the South Branch of the Snake River draining lands from the southern portion of the watershed. Both rivers receive runoff from extensive networks of drainage ditches. The Snake River Watershed is managed by the Middle-Snake-Tamarac Rivers Watershed District (MSTRWD). Fine-grained lake sediments deposited in Glacial-age Lake Agassiz provide the rich soils of today that are the basis for agricultural food production, with approximately 70 percent of the land cover in agricultural uses. Wetlands and forested areas exist primarily in the eastern portions of the watershed. Watershed soils and geology vary from west to east across the watershed, in part largely because of the sediment deposition within Glacial-age Lake Agassiz and erosion of its former beach ridge areas. The area’s extreme continental climate can experience wide annual temperature fluctuations and is semi- arid, with the watershed receiving an average of approximately 22 inches of precipitation per year. Combined with annual evaporation of approximately 30 inches, dry periods can result in very low stream flows along with increased irrigational needs and wildfire potential. The highest monthly rainfalls occur in May through September; June has the highest monthly rainfall. Based on the last 30 years of climate data for Argyle, Minnesota, the average number of days between spring and fall frosts is approximately 130 days with no increasing or decreasing pattern evident. Continuous stream flows are being measured at three gages along the Snake River and one long-term, continuous gage on the Middle River, with data dating back to 1945. However, flows are not monitored below the confluence of the Snake and Middle Rivers, likely because of backwatering effects from the Red River of the North. Hence, monitored flows from the continuous gaging sites of the Middle and upper Snake Rivers were used to predict (via modeling) flows from the combined flow network. Considerable seasonal flow variability was noted, for example, with Middle River values ranging from peak spring flows (maximum of 3,500 cubic feet per second [cfs]) to very low- or no-flow conditions typically encountered in late summer and into the fall. These dry periods with very low base flows are a concern for aquatic biota as well as agricultural production. Degraded water quality (sufficient to violate state water quality standards) was identified by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for six stream segments within the Snake River Watershed RESPEC RSI-2483 i Snake River Watershed Conditions Report and encompassed the entire length of both the Snake River (five segments) and Middle River (one segment). The causes of impaired water quality for each stream segment vary and include low dissolved oxygen and excessive turbidity on the Middle River and the two most downstream reaches on the Snake River, impaired biota (fisheries) and low dissolved oxygen on Snake River’s third reach, impaired biota (fisheries) and turbidity on the Snake River’s fourth reach, and low dissolved oxygen on the Snake River’s headwater reach. Note that the MPCA has recently promulgated new eutrophication standards and replaced turbidity with total suspended solids (TSS) standards for rivers and streams that were approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) in late January 2015. These standards changes are expected to impact the 2015 stream assessment that will determine impairment listings within Snake River Watershed, which are currently being conducted by MPCA’s professional judgment team. Water quality data were available from 21 monitoring sites located throughout the watershed, although the availability of various parameters varied greatly (e.g., many more stations had temperature data available than phosphorus or chlorophyll a data). Water quality evaluations of dissolved oxygen, turbidity, and TSS conducted by this study reinforced impairment listings previously identified. These evaluations also defined levels of E. coli, pH, and phosphorus that likely violate existing or newly approved river quality standards. The MPCA is currently evaluating the intensive monitoring data from 2012–2014, and updated water quality and biological assessments are expected in early 2015. RESPEC RSI-2483 ii Snake River Watershed Conditions Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 WATERSHED SETTING ...................................................................................................... 2 2.1 WATER RESOURCES ..................................................................................................... 2 2.1.1 Major Rivers and Streams................................................................................... 2 2.1.2 Lakes and Impoundments .................................................................................. 6 2.1.3 Wetlands ........................................................................................................... 6 2.1.4 Groundwater ..................................................................................................... 6 2.2 LAND CHARACTERISTICS ............................................................................................. 7 2.2.1 Topography ....................................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Geology and Geomorphology .............................................................................. 7 2.2.3 Soils .................................................................................................................. 10 2.2.4 Ecoregions ........................................................................................................ 10 2.2.5 Natural Resources .............................................................................................. 10 2.3 CLIMATE ..................................................................................................................... 14 2.4 HUMAN INFLUENCES.................................................................................................... 19 2.4.1 Land Use ........................................................................................................... 19 2.4.2 Water Use ......................................................................................................... 21 2.4.3 Drainage Systems .............................................................................................. 21 2.4.4 Drinking Water Source Protection ....................................................................... 26 2.4.5 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permitted Discharge Facilities ...... 26 2.4.6 Socioeconomics ................................................................................................. 28 2.4.7 Local Governments ............................................................................................ 30 2.4.7.1 Watershed Districts ................................................................................ 30 2.4.7.2 County Soil and Water Conservation Districts........................................... 30 3.0 WATER QUALITY STANDARDS AND IMPAIRMENTS ....................................................... 31 3.1 WATER QUALITY STANDARDS ...................................................................................... 31 3.1.1 Aquatic Life Protection Standards ........................................................................ 32 3.1.2 Aquatic Recreation Protection Standards ............................................................. 33 3.2 IMPAIRMENTS ............................................................................................................. 34 4.0 EXISTING DATA AND PREVIOUS WORK.......................................................................... 38 4.1 AVAILABILITY
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Snake River Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report (Wq-Ws3-09020309B)
    .m .. Snake River Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report October 2016 Authors Contributors/acknowledgements MPCA Snake River Watershed Report Team: Citizen Stream Monitoring Program Volunteers Anthony Dingmann, Michael Bourdaghs, The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs Andrew Butzer, Dave Christopherson, David by using the Internet to distribute reports and Duffey, Mark Gernes, Joseph Hadash, Michael information to wider audience. Visit our website Sharp, Nate Sather, Bruce Monson, Scott for more information. Niemela, Shawn Nelson, Denise Oakes, Kris Parson MPCA reports are printed on 100 percent post- consumer recycled content paper manufactured without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Department of Agriculture Middle-Snake-Tamarac Watershed District International Water Institute Project dollars provided by the Clean Water Fund (from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment). Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us Document number: wq-ws3-09020309b List of Acronyms AUID Assessment Unit Identification LRVW Limited Resource Value Water Determination M Mesotrophic CCSI Channel Condition and Stability Index MCES Metropolitan Council Environmental CD County Ditch Services Chl-a Chlorophyll-a MDA Minnesota Department of Agriculture
    [Show full text]
  • Red River of the North Fisheries Management Plan
    Red River of the North Fisheries Management Plan Minnesota Department of Natural Resources North Dakota Game and Fish Department Manitoba Water Stewardship South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks April 2008 - 2012 Red River of the North Fisheries Management Plan I. Red River of the North Description The hydrologic headwaters of Red River of the North (Red River) originate in the upper portions of the Otter Tail River watershed. Red River of the North, by name, begins at the confluence of the Bois de Sioux and Otter Tail rivers and flows northward approximately 545 miles through the bed of glacial Lake Agassiz where it empties into Lake Winnipeg (Figure 1). The upstream 400 miles of Red River forms the Minnesota-North Dakota border and the downstream 145 miles flow through southern Manitoba, Canada. Red River has a watershed area of approximately 45,000 square miles excluding the Assiniboine River basin, which joins Red River at Winnipeg. Twenty-one primary subwatersheds located in North Dakota, Minnesota, and Manitoba empty into Red River (Figure 1). Approximately 46.6% of the Red River watershed (21,000 mi 2) lies in North Dakota, 38.9% (17,500 mi 2) in Minnesota, 12.7% (5,700 mi 2) in Manitoba and 1.8% (810 mi 2) in South Dakota (Eddy et al. 1972). Land use throughout the basin is dominated by agricultural practices. Red River is a highly sinuous, low gradient warmwater river with an extensive floodplain. Stream sinuosity through the U.S. portion of Red River averages 2.0, ranging from 1.6 to 2.6 through the different segments.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Watershed Assessment Snake River (MN) HUC: 09020309
    SNAKE RIVE R (MN) HUC: 09020309 Rapid Watershed Assessment Snake River (MN) HUC: 09020309 Rapid watershed assessments provide initial estimates of where conservation investments would best address the concerns of landowners, conservation districts, and other community organizations and stakeholders. These assessments help land–owners and local leaders set priorities and determine the best actions to achieve their goals. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington DC 20250-9410, or call 1 (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. SNAKE RIVE R (MN) HUC: 09020309 Introduction The Snake River 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) subbasin is part of the Red River Basin in northwestern Minnesota. The watershed occurs in the Glacial Lake Agassiz Plains ecoregion. Soils at the mouth of the watershed are clayey soils of the lake plain. Moving eastward, soils are black, limey, clayey soils in the central part of the watershed, and sandy soils in the eastern headwaters of the watershed. The greater Red River basin characteristically has a poorly defined floodplain and low gradient that combine with extensive drainage, widespread conversion of tallgrass prairie to farmland, and urban/ suburban development to leave the basin subject to frequent floods that affect urban and rural infrastructure and agricultural production.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation of the Red River Valley of the North
    TRANSFORMATION OF THE RED RIVER VALLEY OF THE NORTH: AN ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By Kathleen Ruth Gilmore Brokke In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major Department: History, Philosophy, and Religious Studies December 2015 Fargo, North Dakota North Dakota State University Graduate School Title TRANSFORMATIONS OF THE RED RIVER VALLEY OF THE NORTH: AN ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY By Kathleen Ruth Gilmore Brokke The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Dr. Mark Harvey Chair Dr. Thomas Isern Dr. Gary K. Clambey Dr. Jim Mochoruk Approved: April 14, 2016 Dr. John K. Cox Date Department Chair ABSTRACT This environmental history of the Red River Valley from the mid 1850s – 2000 encompasses those who lived in this tallgrass prairie region and asks how did they live within this environment? In addition, it seeks to understand how they utilized their surrounding natural world. Beyond this, with less than 1 percent of the tallgrass prairie remaining, this work showcases an important aspect of our region few know. Why is this important? The tallgrass helped create the fertile soil, which is the major reason for the high yields of wheat and other crops, and agriculture is the major industry in this region. Also, many of the native plants that once grew abundantly were eaten as food or used as medicine. A ‘cornucopia’ of food existed in this region.
    [Show full text]
  • Marshall County S Wonderful Wealth Producing Soil
    VOLUME XXXIV. $1.50 PER YEAR. WARREN, MARSHALL COUNTY, MINNESOTA, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 1915 SECTION ONE. NUMBER 32. r •*•*•+•* -*-*-*-*-+-4...*-*«4w|Mw|, T •••••••••••••••H eviewo/Golden Opportunities i« Marshall County s Wonderful Wealth Producing Soil. ff^-7 I?.* A 4 Map of Marshall County. Minnesota, Locating pities, Townships, Railroads and Rivers '•£ MARSHALL COUNTY'S SPLENDID normal, domestic science, music and art departments, EDUCATIONAL ADVANTAGES presided over by noted educators. Splendid, large, well MARSHALL COUNTY'S CREAMERIES PAID MARSHALL COUNTY'S BANKS HAVE equipped college.building and ample campus with park • h-)-. FARMER-DAIRYMEN $167,030.25- OVER THREE MILLIONS DEPOSITS. State High and Graded Schools.—There are three grounds. , Villa Rosa Academy, Argyle, Minnesota, an insti- .- • There are thirteen co-operative creameries, having Number of banks, 1915, 25; capital $355,000; Sur­ \ :™^ fefei**^^^ training of the youth, ^ 1|18 patrons; number of cows, 7,870; number of pounds plus and Profits, $154,750; deposits $3,035,290; the • State High schools in the county, located. .va- t.«*.-?- Warre,. Augin i ~^,""~" ,ty*^^i^^^}^a^wi una training oi the i #^ter-J)lal!itifattufed 733,371; axe^e price, paid for ?^Lc^?ita wealth $185.78 for every man, woman an! fecienceArgyle foanrd thStephen^eace girls and h Manuawith l a Traininfour ir^omestie^^tlMegy**r?' and , Agrhigih T ^W^i«s^:or£l^ VJbutter-fat, 29 cents; paid'farmer-dairymen, $1^7,:030.25; ng 2and Agri- "' / LL. "*&*.• child in the county,, based on the 'I9iflti&- S. census. *- ^schooculturl e coursefor th,e thaboyst . deludeWarresn *als SewlHg"'^^"o has a Norma"~ "' l course r net profits of creameries, $33,411.08, all of which MARSHALL COUNTY'S GREAT LA>ND AREA.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
    STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 105.391, Subd. 1, the Commissioner of Natural Resources hereby publishes the final inventory of Protected (i.e. Public) Waters and Wetlands for Marshall County. This list is to be used in conjunction with the Protected Waters and Wetlands Map prepared for Marshall County. Copies of the final map and list are available for inspection at the following state and county offices: DNR Regional Office, Bemidji DNR Area Office, Detroit Lakes Marshall SWCD Marshall County Auditor Dated: STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES JOSEPH N. ALEXANDER, Commissioner By: DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATERS FINAL DESIGNATION OF PROTECTED WATERS AND WETLANDS WITHIN MARSHALL COUNTY, MINNESOTA. A. Listed below are the townships of Marshall County and the township/range numbers in which they occur. Township Name Township # Range # Agder 154;155 42 Alma 156 47 Augsburg 158 47 Big Woods 156 50 Bloomer 156 49 Boxville 154 48 Cedar 157 42 Como 158 42 Comstock 154;155 46 Donnelly 158 49 Eagle Point 158 50 East Park 158 44 East Valley 156 42 Eckvoll 156 40 Espelie 154;155 39 Excel 154;155 43 Foldahl 156 46 Fork 157 50 Grand Plain 154;155 41 Holt 156 43 Huntly 158 43 Lincoln 158 45 Linsell 158 39 Marsh Grove 156 45 McCrea 154;155 47 Middle River 156 48 Moose River 158 40 Moylan 154;155 40 Mud Lake 156 41 Nelson Park 158 46 New Folden 156 44 New Maine 157 44 New Solum 154;155 44 Page 1 Township Name Township # Range # Oak Park 154;155 50 Parker 157 49 Rollis 157 40 Sinnott 158 48 Spruce Valley 157 43 Tamarac 157 48 Thief Lake 158 41 Valley 156 39 Vega 154;155 49 Veldt 157 39 Viking 154;155 45 Wanger 157 47 Warrenton 155 48 West Valley 157 45 Whiteford 157 41 Wright 157 46 B.
    [Show full text]
  • Marshall County, Minnesota and Incorporated Areas
    MARSHALL COUNTY MARSHALL COUNTY, MINNESOTA AND INCORPORATED AREAS Community Community Name Number ALVARADO, CITY OF 270267 ARGYLE, CITY OF 270268 GRYGLA, CITY OF 270269 *HOLT, CITY OF 270811 MARSHALL COUNTY (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 270638 MIDDLE RIVER, CITY OF 270270 NEWFOLDEN, CITY OF 270271 OSLO, CITY OF 270272 STEPHEN, CITY OF 270273 *STRANDQUIST, CITY OF 270813 *VIKING, CITY OF 270814 WARREN, CITY OF 270274 *NO SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS IDENTIFIED Revised Preliminary: FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 27089CV000A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone(s) New Zone Al through A30 AE B X C X Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: To Be Determined TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AGASSIZ NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Middle River, Minnesota
    AGASSIZ NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Middle River, Minnesota ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1983 AGASSIZ NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Middle River, Minnesota ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1983 U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE SYSTEM 3 5 8 2 1 4 7 PERSONNEL 1. Joseph Kotok .... Project Leader GS 12/8 . PET 2. Ronald L. Bell . Principal Assistant Refuge Manager . GS 11/5 . PET 3. James P. Mattsson . Refuge Biologist GS 11/4 . PET 4. Larry E. Lewis . Assistant Refuge Manager GS 9/2 . PET 5. Beulah J. Wikstrom . Administrative Technician GS 5/5 . PET 6. Donald F. Schultz . Wildlife Biologist (General) GS 7/1 . Temp 7. Virgil D. Erickson . Maintenance Mechanic WG 9/5 . PET 8. Conrad 0. Burrell . Engineering Equipment Operator . WG 8/5 . PET 9. George Severts . Tractor Operator . WG 6/4 . CSFT 10. Roy Ruud Tractor Operator WG 6/4 . CSFT 11. Melvin N. Hagen . Dragline Operator WG 8/1 . Temp REVIEW AND APPROVALS GOVERNOR'S YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM (GYEP) 1. Paul Polansky . 6-13-83 to 8-16-83 2. Susan Olson . 6-13-83 to 8-09-83 3. Charlene Fillmore 6-13-83 to 8-03-83 4. Todd Garfve . 6-13-83 to 7-28-83 SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM (SYEP) 5. David Larson 6-13-83 to 8-05-83 VOLUNTEERS 6. Jeff DiMatteo 3-22-83 to 9-25-83 7. Dan Narverud 6-13-83 to 8-17-83 8. James R. Berquist, Jr 5-16-83 to 9-02-83 9. Donald F.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Availability from Surficial Aquifers in the Red River of the North Basin, Minnesota
    Prepared in cooperation with the MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Ground-Water Availability from Surficial Aquifers in the Red River of the North Basin, Minnesota Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5204 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Ground-Water Availability from Surficial Aquifers in the Red River of the North Basin, Minnesota By Thomas H.C. Reppe Prepared in cooperation with the Minnesota Geological Survey and Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Department of the Interior Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5204 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2005 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Reppe, T.H.C., 2005, Ground-water availability from surficial aquifers in the Red River of the North Basin, Minnesota: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005–5204, 54 p. Prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey in Mounds View, Minnesota (http://mn.water.usgs.gov) iii Contents Acknowledgments .
    [Show full text]
  • 15Th IRRB.Pdf
    PREFACE This report documents water quality trends and exceedances of objectives, effluent releases, and control measures for the Red River basin for the 2012 Water Year (October 01, 2012 through September 30, 2013). In addition, this report describes the activities of the International Red River Board during the reporting period October 01, 2013 to September 30, 2014 and identifies several current and future water quality and water quantity issues in the basin. The units of measure presented in this report are those of the respective agencies contributing to this report. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SUMMARY 1 1.01 WATER QUALITY AND WATER QUALITY 1 1.02 INTERNATIONAL RED RIVER BOARD ACTIVITIES 3 1.03 INTERNATIONAL RED RIVER BOARD THREE YEAR WORK PLAN (2012-2015) 4 2.0 INTRODUCTION 5 3.0 INTERNATIONAL RED RIVER BOARD MEMBERSHIP 7 4.0 INTERNATIONAL RED RIVER BOARD ACTIVITIES 9 4.01 INTERIM AND ANNUAL BOARD MEETINGS 9 4.02 IJC INTERNATIONAL WATERSHEDS INITIATIVE 9 4.03 IMPROVING THE INFORMATION BASE TO ADDRESS TRANSBOUNDARY ISSUES 10 4.03-1 WATER QUALITY MONITORING AT THE INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY AND RED RIVER BASIN 11 4.03-2 WATER QUALITY AND ECOSYSTEM HEALTH 11 4.03-3 INTERNATIONAL WATER QUALITY OBJECTIVES FOR NUTRIENTS 12 4.03-4 WATER QUANTITY APPORTIONMENT 14 4.04 COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD MITIGATION STRATEGY 16 4.05 INVASIVE SPECIES – ZEBRA MUSSELS 19 4.06 LOWER PEMBINA RIVER FLOODING 20 4.07 POPLAR RIVER BASIN 22 5.0 WATER QUALITY AT THE INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY 23 5.01 WATER QUALITY OBJECTIVES 23 5.02 ALERT LEVELS 24 6.0 WATER QUALITY SURVEILLANCE
    [Show full text]
  • Polk County Local Water Plan 5 Year Update/Approved 9/13/17
    Polk County Local Water Plan 5 Year Update/Approved 9/13/17 Local Water Management Coordinators East Polk Soil & Water Conservation District West Polk Soil and Water Conservation District 1 Polk County Board of Commissioners Donald Diedrich 32620 200 th St. SW Warren, MN 56762 Warren Strandell 2024 10th St. SE East Grand Forks, MN 56721 Gerald Jacobson 42310 Center Ave. S. Fertile, MN 56540 Gary Willhite 618 Lowell St. Crookston, MN 56716 Joan Lee 28292 300th St. SE McIntosh, MN 56556 2 Polk County Water Plan Committee Joan Lee County Commissioner Jerry Jacobson County Commissioner Lisa Newton East Polk Soil & Water Conservation District Sarah Mielke East Polk Soil & Water Conservation District Ken Pederson East Polk Soil & Water Conservation District John Sorenson West Polk Soil & Water Conservation District Nicole Bernd West Polk Soil & Water Conservation District Brett Arne MN Board of Water & Soil Resources Josh Holte Polk County Environmental Services Emily Hutchins, MN Department of Natural Resources Stephanie Klamm Natural Resources Conservation Service Dan Wilkens Sand Hill River Watershed District Corey Hanson Red Lake Watershed District Christine Slowinski Middle River Snake River Watershed District Denise Oakes MN Pollution Control Agency Michael Knudson IWI Laurie Fairchild U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Rob Sip MN Department of Agriculture Jennilynn Marchand MN Department of Health Richard Rock Union Lake Improvement District Mike Schulz Maple Lake Improvement District Bob Baird City of Crookston Mike Powers City of East Grand Forks Assoc. of Townships 3 Table of Contents County Commissioners……………………………………………………………….2 Task Force Committee…………………………………………….………………….3 I. Executive Summary………………………………………………………5 Introduction Purpose of the Local Water Management Plan Local Water Management Update Process Description of Priority Concerns Consistency with Other Plans Watersheds in Polk County II.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report on Red River Valley W Ater Needs and Options
    Final Report on Red River Valley ater Needs and Options U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Dakotas Area Office November 2005 Final Needs and Options Report Acronym List ac-ft - acre feet NDSWC - North Dakota State Water ASR - aquifer storage and recovery Commission bgals - billion gallons Needs and Options Report - Report on Red bgals/yr - billion gallons per year River Valley Water Needs and Options BIA - Buearu of Indian Affairs NPDWR - National Primary Drinking Water CDSS.-.Colorado Decision Support Systems Regulations cfs - cubic feet per second NSDWR - National Secondary Drinking Water Corps - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulations DEB - Doug Emerson basin also DEBs Doug OM&R - operation, maintenance, and Emerson basins replacement DEIS - Draft Environmental Impact Statement Phase IA report - Reclamation 1998 study DWRA - Dakota Water Resources Act Phase IB report - Reclamation 1999 study EIS - Environmental Impact Statement Phase II report - Reclamation 2000 study EOM - End of Month Project - Red River Valley Water Supply EPA - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Project Garrison Diversion - Garrison Diversion Q90 - MPCA’s 90% exceedance flow guideline Conservancy District Reclamation - Bureau of Reclamation GDU - Garrison Diversion Unit Red River - Red River of the North GIS - Geographical Information Systems Red River Basin - Red River of the North Basin gpc/d - gallons per capita per day SCADA - supervisory control and data gpm - gallons per minute acquisition MAF - million acre feet SCPP - Snake Creek Pumping
    [Show full text]