Red River Basin
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
2014 Annual Report
BOIS DE SIOUX WATERSHED DISTRICT 704 Highway 75 South Phone: 320-563-4185 Wheaton, MN 56296-1304 Fax: 320-563-4987 E-Mail:[email protected] www.bdswd.com Calendar Year 2014 Annual Report Page 1 of 38 BOIS DE SIOUX WATERSHED DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT CALENDAR YEAR 2014 BOARD OF MANAGERS NAME COUNTY PHONE TERM EXPIRES Allen Wold Traverse 320-563-8743 2017 Doug Dahlen Grant 320-766-5794 2016 Jerome Deal Traverse 320-563-8377 2016 President Kurt Erlandson Otter Tail 218-739-4561 2017 Linda Vavra Stevens 320-677-2586 2016 Treasurer Scott Gillespie Big Stone 320-748-7149 2015 Secretary John Kappahn Grant 218-685-4604 2017 Vice President Jason Beyer Wilkin 218-651-0135 2015 Ron Vold Traverse 320-748-7555 2015 CONSULTING STAFF Charles L. Anderson (thru 9-2014) Thomas C. Athens Engineer Attorney WSN Engineering Svingen, Athens & Russell 610 Filmore 125 South Mill Street Alexandria, MN 56308 Fergus Falls, MN 56537 320-762-8149 P 218-998-4088 P 320-762-0263 F 218-998-4087 F Chad L. Engels (9-2014 thru 12-2014) Engineer Moore Engineering Inc. 925 10th Avenue East West Fargo, ND 58078 701-499-5810 DISTRICT STAFF Jon Roeschlein Monica Wilson District Administrator Assistant Administrator 1603 1st Avenue North 901 6th Avenue North Wheaton, MN 56296 Wheaton, MN 56296 Page 2 of 38 OFFICE Bois de Sioux Watershed District 704 Highway 75 South Wheaton, MN 56296 320-563-4185 P 320-563-4987 F [email protected] Page 3 of 38 Project Team Members The Bois de Sioux Watershed District is a subwatershed of the Red River of the North basin. -
Mustinka River Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report
Mustinka River Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report November 2013 Authors The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs MPCA Mustinka River Watershed Report by using the Internet to distribute reports and Team: information to wider audience. Visit our Dave Dollinger, Ben Lundeen, Kevin Stroom, website for more information. Andrew Streitz, Bruce Monson, Shawn Nelson, MPCA reports are printed on 100% post- Kris Parson, Andrew Butzer, Dereck Richter consumer recycled content paper manufactured without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Contributors / acknowledgements Citizen Stream Monitoring Program Volunteers Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Department of Agriculture Red River Watershed Management Board Project dollars provided by the Clean Water Fund (from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us Document number: wq-ws3-09020102b List of acronyms AUID Assessment Unit Identification Analysis Procedure Determination MPCA Minnesota Pollution Control Agency CCSI Channel Condition and Stability Index MSHA Minnesota Stream Habitat Assessment CD County Ditch MTS Meets the Standard? CI Confidence Interval N Nitrogen CLMP Citizen Lake Monitoring Program Nitrate-N Nitrate Plus Nitrite Nitrogen CR County Road NA Not Assessed CSAH -
The Traverse County Comprehensive Local Water Plan
TRAVERSE COUNTY WATER PLAN UPDATE January 1, 2005- December 31, 2014 Prepared by: Sara Gronfeld, Traverse County Water Plan Coordinator Assistance Provided by the Bois de Sioux Watershed District and Other Local and Regional Agencies TABLE OF CONTENTS ____Page Number Local Water Management Council..........................................3 Traverse County Commissioners...........................................3 A. Executive Summary ............................................................4 Introduction............................................................4 Purpose ..................................................................4 Summary of Goals and Actions .........................................4 Description of Priority Concerns .......................................5 Erosion ...................................................................4 Flood Damage........................................................5 Contaminated Runoff............................................5 Groundwater Contamination................................6 Consistency with Other Plans..............................6 Recommendations to Other Plans & Controls....7 B. Priority Concerns Assessment of Priority Concerns................................ 9-20 Assessment of Erosion.......................................10 Assessment of Flood Damage ...........................13 Assessment of Contaminated Runoff................16 Assessment of Groundwater Contamination....18 C. Goals, Objectives, and Action items ........................ 21-27 Action Items, -
Red River Valley Water Supply Project Class I Cultural Resources Inventory and Assessment, Eastern North Dakota and Nortwestern Minnesota
RED RIVER VALLEY WATER SUPPLY PROJECT CLASS I CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT, EASTERN NORTH DAKOTA AND NORTWESTERN MINNESOTA Michael A. Jackson, Dennis L. Toom, and Cynthia Kordecki December 2006 ABSTRACT In 2004-2006, personnel from Anthropology Research, Department of Anthropology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, conducted a Class I inventory (file search) for the Red River Valley Water Supply Project (RRVWSP). This work was carried out in cooperation with the USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Dakotas Area Office, Bismarck, ND. The file search dealt with hundreds of cultural resource sites across much of eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota. Archeological sites, architectural sites, site leads, and isolated finds were examined for 14 North Dakota counties and four Minnesota counties. Five different action alternatives were investigated to determine the number and types of previously recorded cultural resources located within each. Each alternative was ranked in terms of its potential to cause impacts to cultural resources, both known and (presently) unknown. Analysis indicated that the Red River Basin Alternative (#3) has the largest potential for cultural resource site impacts. From a least-impact cultural resources perspective, the other four alternatives represent the best, least-impact options for construction of the RRVWSP. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................................................ii -
Handbook Revision for a Future Meeting
Mustinka & Bois de Sioux Watersheds Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan Boundary Legend ~ Bois de Sioux WO Wilkin WestOttie r1 --- -- County/SWCD ~~ Planning Boundary / l LJ Bois de Sioux River =--~-~ ~ , Mustinka River 6N 2.51.25 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 H H E--3 E----3 IMiles Operating Procedures BOARD OF WATER m, AND SOIL RESOURCES tCLEANill WATER One Watershed, One Plan LAND& LEGACY Operating Procedures AME:\IDMENT From the Board of Water and Soil Resources, State of Minnesota Version: 2.00 Effective Date: 03/28/2018 Approval: Board Decision #18-14 Policy Statement These are the minimum procedural requirements for developing a comprehensive watershed management plan through the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources’ (BWSR) One Watershed, One Plan program. The One Watershed, One Plan vision is to align local water planning on major watershed boundaries with state strategies towards prioritized, targeted, and measurable implementation plans. These procedures are based on the One Watershed, One Plan Guiding Principles adopted by BWSR on December 18, 2013. Minnesota Statutes §103B.101 Subd. 14 permits BWSR to adopt methods to allow comprehensive plans, local water management plans, or watershed management plans to serve as substitutes for one another, or to be replaced with one comprehensive watershed management plan, and requires BWSR to establish a suggested watershed boundary framework for these plans. Minnesota Statutes §103B.801 outlines the purpose of, and requirements for, comprehensive watershed management plans and directs BWSR to establish operating procedures for plan development. www.bwsr.state.mn.us 1 Table of Contents I. Boundary Framework .........................................................................................................................................3 A. -
Abandoned Channels of the Lower Sheyenne River Statewide Lidar Coverage Offers Detailed Picture of North Dakota’S Deglacial History
Abandoned Channels of the Lower Sheyenne River Statewide LiDAR coverage offers detailed picture of North Dakota’s deglacial history Levi D. Moxness The Sheyenne River as we know it today is a relatively small, and shallow groundwater sources, that may be tens of miles from slow-moving, and unassuming watercourse when not in flood the modern Sheyenne River. Recently acquired, high-resolution stage; its 591 miles of meanders, the longest course of any Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data reveals the surface of river within the state, are a familiar fixture of the southeastern North Dakota in unprecedented detail, offering not only a clearer North Dakota landscape. Early in its geologic history, however, picture of its recent geologic history, but increased precision in the river would have looked very different. Over the course of the characterization of its surficial geologic resources. only a few thousand years, the Sheyenne distributed glacial meltwater, surface runoff, and sediment from North Dakota to In contrast to the unglaciated southwestern portion of the state, the Missouri River, the Mississippi River, the Great Lakes, the where major landscape features have been sculpted by hundreds Arctic Ocean, and eventually Hudson Bay via various former of thousands of years of mostly gradual erosion, the surface of channels and glacial lake outlets (fig. 1). These early river phases eastern North Dakota was formed comparatively recently, and left behind sands and gravels, heavily-utilized today as aggregate much more rapidly. At the close of the Last Glacial Maximum between 18,000 and 14,000 years ago, the southwestern margin of the Laurentide Ice Sheet melted back from the Missouri Coteau and drainageways established themselves over much of east-central North Dakota. -
Is It a Levee Or a Dam ? Devils Lake, North Dakota - Update
IAFSM 2011 Annual Conference Marriot Bloomington-Normal Hotel & Conference Center March 9 & 10, 2011 Is it a Levee or a Dam ? Devils Lake, North Dakota - Update Stephen L. McCaskie, P.E., G.E., Hanson Professional Services Devils Lake, North Dakota Problem History Levee vs. Dam RAADS / City Embankments Hydraulics & Hydrology Geology / Hydrogeology Subsurface Conditions Dam Analyses Project Features and Design Instrumentation Constructability Status City Embankments Problem Since 1990, flooding destroyed hundreds of homes and businesses, inundated thousands of acres of farmland North Dakota and the U.S. government have spent more than $450 million in flood mitigation Devils Lake lies within a 3,810-square-mile closed sub-basin of the Red River of the North Since glaciation, Devils Lake has naturally fluctuated from dry to overflowing through several coulees Devils Lake has risen 52 feet since 1940 (1400.9 - 10/24/1940; 1452.05 – 6/27/2010) Devils Lake spills into Stump Lake at 1446 Current level of 1452 lake covers 258 square miles At 1459 combined lakes spill into Sheyenne River through Tolna Coulee Water Quality Issues Dissolved Solids and Sulfate Concentrations Water Quality Constraints Sheyenne River Sulfate 450 mg/l Red River of the North Sulfate 250 mg/l TDS 500 mg/l ND State Water Commission Designed / constructed Devils Lake West End outlet Manitoba lawsuit over 402 Permit denied Pumps / pipelines / channels Max 250 cfs (permitted) when above 1445.0 History RAADS - Roads Acting As Dams – Existing roads “elevated” to act as dams – Roads not designed / constructed to provide flood protection – New embankments designed w/ USACE Dam Safety Criteria Devils Lake City Embankments – Analyzed for flood damage reduction purposes – 1987 Initially authorized / constructed as levees (section 205) – Raised 1995, 1997, 2004 under PL84-99 using Flood Control and Coastal Emergency Funds – Embankments designed w/ USACE Dam Safety Criteria Levee vs. -
Devils Lake Diversion: a Dilemma
THE CANADIAN ATLAS ONLINE MANITOBA – GRADE 10 www.canadiangeographic.ca/atlas Devils Lake Diversion: A Dilemma Lesson Overview In this activity the students will look at the Devils Lake water diversion issue which involves Manitoba and the U.S. state of North Dakota. The students will read an overview of the issue, assess the issue, look at differing perspectives, and evaluate the economic value of the Red River, Lake Winnipeg, and tributaries. Grade Level Grade 10 Time Required One or two 60-minute lessons Curriculum Connection Manitoba – Geography 20G (Grade 10), Geographic Issues of the 21st Century Link to Canadian National Geography Standards • Essential Element #3 (Grades 9-12) – Physical Systems • Essential Element #4 (Grades 9-12) - Human Systems • Essential Element #5 (Grades 9-12) - Environment and Society • Geographic Skill #4 (Grades 9-12) - Analyzing geographic information • Geographic Skill #5 (Grades 9-12) - Answering geographic questions Principal Resource The following sections of The Canadian Atlas Online are used in this lesson: • Rivers of Canada: Red River/Central Plain: www.canadiangeographic.ca/atlas/themes.aspx?id=rivers&sub=rivers_west _red&lang=En • This water-rich land (pages 12-13 of The Canadian Atlas)---- www.canadiangeographic.ca/atlas/themes.aspx?id=waterrich Additional Resources, Materials and Equipment Required • Overhead projector or computer projector • Student Activity Sheet: Devils Lake Diversion: A Dilemma • Computer lab with access to the Internet and these sites: www.gov.mb.ca/waterstewardship/transboundary/maps/map2.html CANADIAN COUNCIL FOR GEOGRAPHIC EDUCATION 1 THE CANADIAN ATLAS ONLINE MANITOBA – GRADE 10 www.canadiangeographic.ca/atlas Main Objective Students will understand the Devils Lake Diversion issue and assess the economic impact on the Red River, Lake Winnipeg, and tributaries as well as weigh the pros and cons of the issue. -
Snake River Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report (Wq-Ws3-09020309B)
.m .. Snake River Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report October 2016 Authors Contributors/acknowledgements MPCA Snake River Watershed Report Team: Citizen Stream Monitoring Program Volunteers Anthony Dingmann, Michael Bourdaghs, The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs Andrew Butzer, Dave Christopherson, David by using the Internet to distribute reports and Duffey, Mark Gernes, Joseph Hadash, Michael information to wider audience. Visit our website Sharp, Nate Sather, Bruce Monson, Scott for more information. Niemela, Shawn Nelson, Denise Oakes, Kris Parson MPCA reports are printed on 100 percent post- consumer recycled content paper manufactured without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Department of Agriculture Middle-Snake-Tamarac Watershed District International Water Institute Project dollars provided by the Clean Water Fund (from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment). Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us Document number: wq-ws3-09020309b List of Acronyms AUID Assessment Unit Identification LRVW Limited Resource Value Water Determination M Mesotrophic CCSI Channel Condition and Stability Index MCES Metropolitan Council Environmental CD County Ditch Services Chl-a Chlorophyll-a MDA Minnesota Department of Agriculture -
Mustinka River Watershed WRAPS Report Went Through Its 30-Day Public Noticed Review and Comment Period from March 28, 2016, Through April 27, 2016
Mustinka River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy Report wq-ws4-20a October 2016 Project Partners Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc.: Meghan Funke, PhD Jason Ulrich Jason Naber Etoile Jensen Cary Hernandez (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) Jon Roeschlein (Bois de Sioux Watershed District) Pete Waller (Board of Soil and Water Resources) Matt Solemsaas (Stevens SWCD) Bill Kleindl (Stevens County) Sara Gronfeld (Traverse County/SWCD) Blayne Johnson (Big Stone SWCD) Joe Montonye (Grant SWCD) Brad Mergens (Otter Tail SWCD) 2 Table of Contents Project Partners......................................................................................................................................... 2 Key Terms .................................................................................................................................................. 6 What is the WRAPS Report?...................................................................................................................... 7 Users’ Guide .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Watershed Background & Description ........................................................................... 10 2. Watershed Conditions .................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Water Quality Assessment .......................................................................................................... 12 Streams .............................................................................................................................................. -
Red River of the North Fisheries Management Plan
Red River of the North Fisheries Management Plan Minnesota Department of Natural Resources North Dakota Game and Fish Department Manitoba Water Stewardship South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks April 2008 - 2012 Red River of the North Fisheries Management Plan I. Red River of the North Description The hydrologic headwaters of Red River of the North (Red River) originate in the upper portions of the Otter Tail River watershed. Red River of the North, by name, begins at the confluence of the Bois de Sioux and Otter Tail rivers and flows northward approximately 545 miles through the bed of glacial Lake Agassiz where it empties into Lake Winnipeg (Figure 1). The upstream 400 miles of Red River forms the Minnesota-North Dakota border and the downstream 145 miles flow through southern Manitoba, Canada. Red River has a watershed area of approximately 45,000 square miles excluding the Assiniboine River basin, which joins Red River at Winnipeg. Twenty-one primary subwatersheds located in North Dakota, Minnesota, and Manitoba empty into Red River (Figure 1). Approximately 46.6% of the Red River watershed (21,000 mi 2) lies in North Dakota, 38.9% (17,500 mi 2) in Minnesota, 12.7% (5,700 mi 2) in Manitoba and 1.8% (810 mi 2) in South Dakota (Eddy et al. 1972). Land use throughout the basin is dominated by agricultural practices. Red River is a highly sinuous, low gradient warmwater river with an extensive floodplain. Stream sinuosity through the U.S. portion of Red River averages 2.0, ranging from 1.6 to 2.6 through the different segments. -
Physical Habitat, Water Quality and Riverine Biological Assemblages of Selected Reaches on the Sheyenne River, North Dakota, 2010
In cooperation with North Dakota State Water Commission Physical Habitat, Water Quality and Riverine Biological Assemblages of Selected Reaches on the Sheyenne River, North Dakota, 2010 Scientific Investigation Report 2011–5178 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. U.S. Geological Survey personnel preparing for fish data collection on the upper Sheyenne River near Maddock, North Dakota, July 12, 2010 (top). Canadian thistle along the banks of the upper Sheyenne River near Cooperstown, North Dakota, July 10, 2010 (lower, left). Wooden footbridge across the upper Sheyenne River near Maddock, North Dakota, July 12, 2010 (lower right). Photographs courtesy of Kathleen M. Macek-Rowland, U.S. Geological Survey. Physical Habitat, Water Quality, and Riverine Biological Assemblages of Selected Reaches of the Sheyenne River, North Dakota, 2010 By Robert F. Lundgren, Kathleen M. Rowland, and Matthew J. Lindsay Prepared in cooperation with North Dakota State Water Commission Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5178 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.