DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report on Red River Valley W Ater Needs and Options

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report on Red River Valley W Ater Needs and Options Final Report on Red River Valley ater Needs and Options U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Dakotas Area Office November 2005 Final Needs and Options Report Acronym List ac-ft - acre feet NDSWC - North Dakota State Water ASR - aquifer storage and recovery Commission bgals - billion gallons Needs and Options Report - Report on Red bgals/yr - billion gallons per year River Valley Water Needs and Options BIA - Buearu of Indian Affairs NPDWR - National Primary Drinking Water CDSS.-.Colorado Decision Support Systems Regulations cfs - cubic feet per second NSDWR - National Secondary Drinking Water Corps - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulations DEB - Doug Emerson basin also DEBs Doug OM&R - operation, maintenance, and Emerson basins replacement DEIS - Draft Environmental Impact Statement Phase IA report - Reclamation 1998 study DWRA - Dakota Water Resources Act Phase IB report - Reclamation 1999 study EIS - Environmental Impact Statement Phase II report - Reclamation 2000 study EOM - End of Month Project - Red River Valley Water Supply EPA - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Project Garrison Diversion - Garrison Diversion Q90 - MPCA’s 90% exceedance flow guideline Conservancy District Reclamation - Bureau of Reclamation GDU - Garrison Diversion Unit Red River - Red River of the North GIS - Geographical Information Systems Red River Basin - Red River of the North Basin gpc/d - gallons per capita per day SCADA - supervisory control and data gpm - gallons per minute acquisition MAF - million acre feet SCPP - Snake Creek Pumping Plant mg/L - milligrams per liter SDWA - Safe Drinking Water Act Mgals - million gallons Sheyenne National Grasslands see the mgd - million gallons per day Grasslands M&I - municipal and industrial TDS - total dissolved solids MNDNR - Minnesota Department of Natural the Grasslands - Sheyenne National Resources Grasslands MNGS - Minnesota Geological Survey USGS - United States Geological Survey MOU - memorandum of understanding WC - water conservation MPCA - Minnesota Pollution Control Agency WCPA - water conservation potential MR&I - municipal, rural, and industrial assessment msl - above mean sea level WTP - water treatment plant NDAC - North Dakota Administrative Code NDCC - North Dakota Century Code Final Needs and Options Report Table of Contents Chapter One - Introduction ................................................ 1-1 1.1 Project Purpose......................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Study Scope .............................................................................. 1-3 1.2.1 Purpose, Planning Horizon, Service Area and Project Area ................ 1-3 1.2.2 Setting.................................................................................................. 1-4 1.3 Background ............................................................................... 1-6 1.3.1 Previous Studies.................................................................................. 1-6 1.3.2 Public Involvement............................................................................... 1-6 1.4 Overview of Report.................................................................... 1-8 Chapter Two - Needs Assessment .................................... 2-1 2.1 Red River Valley Water Systems .............................................. 2-2 2.2 Water Demand Calculation Methods......................................... 2-5 2.3 Population Projections..............................................................2-23 2.4 Per Capita Water Demand .......................................................2-27 2.5 Water Conservation Measures.................................................2-41 2.6 Municipal Water Demand Analysis...........................................2-43 2.7 Rural Water Demand Analysis .................................................2-52 2.8 Industrial Water Demand Analysis ...........................................2-62 2.9 Recreation Water Demand Analysis ........................................2-71 2.10 Other Red River Valley Water Needs.....................................2-73 2.11 Needs Assessment Water Demands Summary .....................2-88 Chapter Three - Hydrology................................................. 3-1 3.1 Introduction................................................................................ 3-1 3.1.1 Methods Used in Evaluating the Hydrology of the Red River Valley .. 3-1 3.1.2 Previous Red River Valley Hydrology Work......................................... 3-1 3.1.3 Surface Water and Groundwater Rights .............................................. 3-2 3.1.4 Climatology Report .............................................................................. 3-4 3.2 Groundwater Hydrology ............................................................ 3-4 3.2.1 Groundwater Overview in Red River Valley......................................... 3-5 3.2.2 Potential for Project Groundwater Development in North Dakota ...... 3-25 3.2.3 Potential for Project Groundwater Development in Minnesota........... 3-38 3.3 Water Demands vs. Water Supplies.........................................3-43 3.3.1 Water Demands to be Evaluated by Surface Water Model................ 3-44 i Final Needs and Options Report 3.3.2 Development of Water Demands for GDU to Sheyenne River Alternative................................................................................................... 3-72 3.4 Surface Water Hydrology .........................................................3-73 3.4.1 Surface Water Quantity Overview in Red River Valley ...................... 3-74 3.4.2 Purpose and Scope of Modeling Effort .............................................. 3-78 3.4.3 Hydrologic Data Collection and Sources............................................ 3-78 3.4.4 Surface Water Quality Overview........................................................ 3-86 3.5 Surface Water Modeling...........................................................3-88 3.5.1 Model Selection Process ................................................................... 3-88 3.5.2 Selection of Model StateMod Development and Calibration.............. 3-89 3.5.3 Modeling Assumptions....................................................................... 3-93 3.5.4 Modeling Approach.......................................................................... 3-101 3.5.5 Results of Surface Water Hydrologic Modeling................................ 3-110 3.5.6 Daily Water Modeling....................................................................... 3-115 3.6 Hydrology Summary...............................................................3-124 3.6.1 Groundwater .................................................................................... 3-124 3.6.2 Surface Water.................................................................................. 3-130 Chapter Four - Options....................................................... 4-1 4.1 Design Criteria........................................................................... 4-1 4.2 Feature Descriptions and Operational Assumptions ................. 4-3 4.3 Options (Alternatives)...............................................................4-20 4.4 Additional Option Analysis........................................................4-35 4.5 Summary of Options (Alternatives) ..........................................4-43 Chapter Five - Conclusions................................................ 5-1 5.1 Introduction................................................................................ 5-1 5.2 Future Water Demands ............................................................. 5-3 5.3 Hydrologic Modeling Results..................................................... 5-6 5.4 Options .....................................................................................5-13 5.5 Use of Report Results ..............................................................5-20 Literature Cited...................................................................5-21 ii Final Needs and Options Report List of Tables Table 1.3.1 - Technical Team Meeting Attendees................................................ 1-7 Table 2.1.1 – Existing (2005) Red River Valley Service Area MR&I Systems. .... 2-2 Table 2.1.2 - Municipalities Maintaining Water Treatment Facilities through 2050 . ...................................................................................................... 2-3 Table 2.1.3 - Municipalities Served by Rural Water Systems through 2050. ....... 2-4 Table 2.1.4 - Water Systems Individually Evaluated in Water Demand Analysis. 2-5 Table 2.2.1 - Fargo Historic Monthly Raw Water Diversion (millions of gallons).. 2-8 Table 2.2.2 - Fargo Historic Metered Water Usage (without system losses) (millions of gallons)......................................................................... 2-9 Table 2.2.3 - Fargo Historic Monthly Metered Water Use without System Losses (gallons per capita/day) ................................................................ 2-11 Table 2.2.4 - Fargo Historic Summer and Winter Monthly per Capita Water Use Data without System Losses (gallons per capita/day). ................. 2-12 Table 2.2.5 - Water Conservation Potential Assessment Results...................... 2-13 Table 2.2.6 - Fargo Water Demand Estimates (from 1988 – 2001 Historic Water Use Data). .................................................................................... 2-15 Table 2.2.7 - Ranked Lowest Naturalized Annual Flows at Emerson, Manitoba for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thursday, June 15, 2017 Thursday, June 15, 2017 2016 Integrated Report - Walsh County
    Thursday, June 15, 2017 Thursday, June 15, 2017 2016 Integrated Report - Walsh County Thursday, June 15, 2017 Cart Creek Waterbody ID Waterbody Type Waterbody Description Date TMDL Completed ND-09020310-044-S_00 RIVER Cart Creek from its confluence with A tributary 2 miles east of Mountain, ND downstream to its confluence with North Branch Park River Size Units Beneficial Use Impaired Beneficial Use Status Cause of Impairment TMDL Priority 36.32 MILES Fish and Other Aquatic Biota Not Supporting Fishes Bioassessments L ND-09020310-044-S_00 RIVER Cart Creek from its confluence with A tributary 2 miles east of Mountain, ND downstream to its confluence with North Branch Park River Size Units Beneficial Use Impaired Beneficial Use Status Cause of Impairment TMDL Priority 36.32 MILES Fish and Other Aquatic Biota Not Supporting Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments L Forest River Waterbody ID Waterbody Type Waterbody Description Date TMDL Completed ND-09020308-001-S_00 RIVER Forest River from Lake Ardoch, downstream to its confluence with the Red River Of The North. Size Units Beneficial Use Impaired Beneficial Use Status Cause of Impairment TMDL Priority 15.49 MILES Fish and Other Aquatic Biota Not Supporting Benthic-Macroinvertebrate Bioassessments L ND-09020308-001-S_00 RIVER Forest River from Lake Ardoch, downstream to its confluence with the Red River Of The North. Size Units Beneficial Use Impaired Beneficial Use Status Cause of Impairment TMDL Priority 15.49 MILES Fish and Other Aquatic Biota Not Supporting Fishes Bioassessments L ND-09020308-001-S_00 RIVER Forest River from Lake Ardoch, downstream to its confluence with the Red River Of The North.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Divisions: La Vérendrye to Selkirk
    LA VÉRENDRYE Total Number of Voting Ballots Registered Area / Rejected Declined Cast/ Voters/ Voting Place / Centre de scrutin (PC) Section (Lib.) / Rejetés / Refusés Total des Nombre (NDP/NPD) de vote Erin MCGEE, suffrages d’électeurs SMOOK, Dennis SMOOK, MITCHELL, Lorena MITCHELL, exprimés inscrits 1 NEW BOTHWELL RECREATION CENTRE 37 22 187 1 0 247 474 2 NEW BOTHWELL RECREATION CENTRE 6 16 179 1 0 202 333 PROVIDENCE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE - 3 19 15 111 1 0 146 234 REIMER STUDENT LIFE CENTRE, OTTERBURNE PROVIDENCE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE - 4 24 31 35 3 0 93 200 REIMER STUDENT LIFE CENTRE, OTTERBURNE 5 KLEEFELD RECREATION CENTRE 9 15 124 1 1 150 288 6 KLEEFELD RECREATION CENTRE 7 2 92 0 1 102 237 7 KLEEFELD RECREATION CENTRE 31 11 179 2 0 223 454 8 KLEEFELD RECREATION CENTRE 15 6 134 0 0 155 299 9 ST. PIERRE JOLYS RECREATION CENTRE 27 27 106 2 0 162 313 10 ST. PIERRE JOLYS RECREATION CENTRE 49 66 78 1 0 194 429 11 ST. PIERRE JOLYS RECREATION CENTRE 39 49 84 0 0 172 359 12 NEW HORIZON COMMUNITY HALL, GRUNTHAL 18 8 154 0 0 180 394 13 NEW HORIZON COMMUNITY HALL, GRUNTHAL 11 14 188 0 1 214 494 14 NEW HORIZON COMMUNITY HALL, GRUNTHAL 18 10 166 1 2 197 465 15 NEW HORIZON COMMUNITY HALL, GRUNTHAL 9 7 206 0 0 222 378 16 CHALET MALOUIN, ST. MALO 17 18 102 0 0 137 271 17 CHALET MALOUIN, ST. MALO 34 42 95 0 2 173 363 18 CHALET MALOUIN, ST.
    [Show full text]
  • DATE: March 20, 2018 TO: Board of Water and Soil Resources
    DATE: March 20, 2018 TO: Board of Water and Soil Resources’ Members, Advisors, and Staff FROM: John Jaschke, Executive Director SUBJECT: BWSR Board Meeting Notice – March 28, 2018 The Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) will meet on Wednesday, March 28, 2018, beginning at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will be held in the lower level Board Room, at 520 Lafayette Road, Saint Paul. Parking is available in the lot directly in front of the building (see hooded parking area). The following information pertains to agenda items: COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS Water Management and Strategic Planning Committee One Watershed, One Plan Operating Procedures and Plan Content Requirements – The One Watershed, One Plan Operating Procedures and Plan Content Requirements are the two policy documents that describe program requirements according to Minnesota Statutes §103B.801. These documents, which were based on policies for the pilot program (developed in 2014), were updated in 2016 when the program was formally established. Since that time, BWSR’s Water Planning Program Team has identified a need to improve the organization and clarity of these documents, along with minor changes to policy elements. The team recommends re-formatting both documents with the new State of Minnesota logo and style. For both documents, the majority of non-policy information (background, context, and optional items) have been removed. DECISION Other changes include: • Policy o High level summary of changes (see the last page of each document for more detail) • Operating Procedures o Removed automatic exemption for LGUs with less than 5% of their area in the planning boundary o Added requirements for sharing public comments during the plan review and approval process • Plan Content Requirements o Land and Water Resources Inventory changed to Narrative; added requirement for discussion of watershed context o Fairly extensive wording changes in Plan Administration and Implementation Programs sections resulting in minor changes to policy elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing the Red River of the North
    FISHING THE RED RIVER OF THE NORTH The Red River boasts more than 70 species of fish. Channel catfish in the Red River can attain weights of more than 30 pounds, walleye as big as 13 pounds, and northern pike can grow as long as 45 inches. Includes access maps, fishing tips, local tourism contacts and more. TABLE OF CONTENTS YOUR GUIDE TO FISHING THE RED RIVER OF THE NORTH 3 FISHERIES MANAGEMENT 4 RIVER STEWARDSHIP 4 FISH OF THE RED RIVER 5 PUBLIC ACCESS MAP 6 PUBLIC ACCESS CHART 7 AREA MAPS 8 FISHING THE RED 9 TIP AND RAP 9 EATING FISH FROM THE RED RIVER 11 CATCH-AND-RELEASE 11 FISH RECIPES 11 LOCAL TOURISM CONTACTS 12 BE AWARE OF THE DANGERS OF DAMS 12 ©2017, State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources FAW-471-17 The Minnesota DNR prohibits discrimination in its programs and services based on race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation or disability. Persons with disabilities may request reasonable modifications to access or participate in DNR programs and services by contacting the DNR ADA Title II Coordinator at [email protected] or 651-259-5488. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4049; or Office of Civil Rights, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C. Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20240. This brochure was produced by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Fish and Wildlife with technical assistance provided by the North Dakota Department of Game and Fish.
    [Show full text]
  • Approaches to Setting Nutrient Targets in the Red River of the North
    APPROACHES TO SETTING NUTRIENT TARGETS IN THE RED RIVER OF THE NORTH Topical Report RSI-2328 prepared for International Joint Commission 1250 23rd St. NW, Room 100 Washington, DC 20440 March 2013 APPROACHES TO SETTING NUTRIENT TARGETS IN THE RED RIVER OF THE NORTH Topical Report RSI-2328 by Andrea B. Plevan Julie A. Blackburn RESPEC 1935 West County Road B2, Suite 320 Roseville, MN 55113 prepared for International Joint Commission 1250 23rd St. NW, Room 100 Washington, DC 20440 March 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The International Joint Commission, through its International Red River Board (IRRB), has developed a proposed approach for a basinwide nutrient management strategy for the international Red River Watershed. One component of the nutrient management strategy involves developing nitrogen and phosphorus targets along the Red River including sites at the outlet of the Red River into Lake Winnipeg, the international boundary at Emerson, and subwatershed discharge points in the watershed. These nutrient objectives will be coordinated with developing nutrient objectives for Lake Winnipeg. As a first step in developing the nutrient targets, the IRRB contracted RESPEC to conduct a literature review of the available scientific methods for setting nitrogen and phosphorus water-quality targets. Based on the findings of the literature review, RESPEC was asked to provide recommendations on the method(s) most appropriate for the Red River. This report includes the findings of the literature review and the recommended scientific approaches for developing nitrogen and phosphorus targets in the Red River. Multiple technical approaches were reviewed. One category of approaches uses the reference condition and includes techniques such as using data from reference sites, modeling the reference condition, estimating the reference condition from all sites within a class, and paleolimnological techniques to reconstruct the reference condition through historical data.
    [Show full text]
  • NWSI 10-903, Geographic Areas Of
    Department of Commerce • National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration • National Weather Service NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE INSTRUCTION 10-903 JULY 26, 2019 Operations and Services Water Resources Services Program, NWSPD 10-9 GEOGRAPHIC AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY NOTICE: This publication is available at: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/directives/ OPR: W/AFS25 (K. Abshire) Certified by: W/AFS25 (M. Mullusky) Type of Issuance: Routine. SUMMARY OF REVISIONS: This directive supersedes NWS Instruction 10-903, “Geographic Areas of Responsibility,” dated February 16, 2017. The following revisions were made to this instruction: 1) In Section 2, updated the link to the RFC boundary shapefiles from the NWS geographic information system (GIS) Portal. 2) In Section 2, updated the location of the Northeast RFC (NERFC) from Taunton to Norton, Massachusetts. 3) In Section 3, updated Figure 2 to show correct Hydrologic Service Area (HSA) boundaries and Weather Forecast Office three-letter identifiers. 4) In Section 3, updated the link to the national Hydrologic Service Area (HSA) map from the NWS geographic information system (GIS) Portal. 5) In Section 3, modified wording to describe the Boston/Norton, MA (BOX), Gray/Portland, ME (GYX), Nashville, TN (OHX) service areas and updated the office names of the New York, NY (OKX) and Philadelphia/Mt. Holly, PA (PHI) offices. Signed 7/12/2019 Andrew D. Stern Date Director Analyze, Forecast, and Support Office NWSI 10-903 JULY 26, 2019 Geographic Areas of Responsibility Table of Contents: Page 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • DEBATES and PROCEEDINGS
    Fourth Session - Thirty-Seventh Legislature of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba DEBATES and PROCEEDINGS Official Report (Hansard) Published under the authority of The Honourable George Hickes Speaker Vol. LII No. 17 – 1:30 p.m., Monday, April 28, 2003 MANITOBA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY First Session–Thirty-Eighth Legislature Member Constituency Political Affiliation AGLUGUB, Cris The Maples N.D.P. ALLAN, Nancy St. Vital N.D.P. ASHTON, Steve, Hon. Thompson N.D.P. VACANT Riel N.D.P. BARRETT, Becky, Hon. Inkster N.D.P. CALDWELL, Drew, Hon. Brandon East N.D.P. CERILLI, Marianne Radisson N.D.P. CHOMIAK, Dave, Hon. Kildonan N.D.P. CUMMINGS, Glen Ste. Rose P.C. DACQUAY, Louise Seine River P.C. DERKACH, Leonard Russell P.C. DEWAR, Gregory Selkirk N.D.P. DOER, Gary, Hon. Concordia N.D.P. DRIEDGER, Myrna Charleswood P.C. DYCK, Peter Pembina P.C. ENNS, Harry Lakeside P.C. FAURSCHOU, David Portage la Prairie P.C. FRIESEN, Jean, Hon. Wolseley N.D.P. GERRARD, Jon, Hon. River Heights Lib. GILLESHAMMER, Harold Minnedosa P.C. HAWRANIK, Gerald Lac du Bonnet P.C. HELWER, Edward Gimli P.C. HICKES, George, Hon. Point Douglas N.D.P. JENNISSEN, Gerard Flin Flon N.D.P. KORZENIOWSKI, Bonnie St. James N.D.P. LATHLIN, Oscar, Hon. The Pas N.D.P. LAURENDEAU, Marcel St. Norbert P.C. LEMIEUX, Ron, Hon. La Verendrye N.D.P. LOEWEN, John Fort Whyte P.C. MACKINTOSH, Gord, Hon. St. Johns N.D.P. MAGUIRE, Larry Arthur-Virden P.C. MALOWAY, Jim Elmwood N.D.P. MARTINDALE, Doug Burrows N.D.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Prairie Perspectives: Geographical Essays
    Prairie Perspectives i PRAIRIE PERSPECTIVES: GEOGRAPHICAL ESSAYS Edited by Douglas C. Munski Department of Geography The University of North Dakota Grand Forks, North Dakota USA Volume 4, October 2001 ii Prairie Perspectives ©Copyright 2001, The University of North Dakota Department of Geography Printed by University of Winnipeg Printing Services ISBN 0-9694203-5-8 Prairie Perspectives iii Table of Contents Preface ............................................................................................................... v The ‘Grass Fire Era’ on the southeastern Canadian prairies W.F. Rannie ....................................................................................................... 1 Soil conductivity and panchromatic aerial photography as tools for the delineation of soil-water management zones J.E. Hart, R.A. McGinn, D.J. Wiseman ......................................................... 20 Modelling relationships between moisture availability and soil/vegetation zonation in southern Saskatchewan and Manitoba G.A.J. Scott, K.J. Scott ................................................................................... 31 Water transported boulders imbricated near Marquette, Michigan as indicators of past Lake Superior storm activity C. Atkinson ..................................................................................................... 41 Nutrient loading in the winter snowfalls over the Clear Lake watershed R.A. McGinn ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Assembly of Manitoba DEBATES and PROCEEDINGS
    First Session – Forty-Second Legislature of the Legislative Assembly of Manitoba DEBATES and PROCEEDINGS Official Report (Hansard) Published under the authority of The Honourable Myrna Driedger Speaker Vol. LXXIII No. 6 - 1:30 p.m., Monday, October 7, 2019 ISSN 0542-5492 MANITOBA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Forty-Second Legislature Member Constituency Political Affiliation ADAMS, Danielle Thompson NDP ALTOMARE, Nello Transcona NDP ASAGWARA, Uzoma Union Station NDP BRAR, Diljeet Burrows NDP BUSHIE, Ian Keewatinook NDP CLARKE, Eileen, Hon. Agassiz PC COX, Cathy, Hon. Kildonan-River East PC CULLEN, Cliff, Hon. Spruce Woods PC DRIEDGER, Myrna, Hon. Roblin PC EICHLER, Ralph, Hon. Lakeside PC EWASKO, Wayne Lac du Bonnet PC FIELDING, Scott, Hon. Kirkfield Park PC FONTAINE, Nahanni St. Johns NDP FRIESEN, Cameron, Hon. Morden-Winkler PC GERRARD, Jon, Hon. River Heights Lib. GOERTZEN, Kelvin, Hon. Steinbach PC GORDON, Audrey Southdale PC GUENTER, Josh Borderland PC GUILLEMARD, Sarah Fort Richmond PC HELWER, Reg Brandon West PC ISLEIFSON, Len Brandon East PC JOHNSON, Derek Interlake-Gimli PC JOHNSTON, Scott Assiniboia PC KINEW, Wab Fort Rouge NDP LAGASSÉ, Bob Dawson Trail PC LAGIMODIERE, Alan Selkirk PC LAMONT, Dougald St. Boniface Lib. LAMOUREUX, Cindy Tyndall Park Lib. LATHLIN, Amanda The Pas-Kameesak NDP LINDSEY, Tom Flin Flon NDP MALOWAY, Jim Elmwood NDP MARCELINO, Malaya Notre Dame NDP MARTIN, Shannon McPhillips PC MOSES, Jamie St. Vital NDP MICHALESKI, Brad Dauphin PC MICKLEFIELD, Andrew Rossmere PC MORLEY-LECOMTE, Janice Seine River PC NAYLOR, Lisa Wolseley NDP NESBITT, Greg Riding Mountain PC PALLISTER, Brian, Hon. Fort Whyte PC PEDERSEN, Blaine, Hon. Midland PC PIWNIUK, Doyle Turtle Mountain PC REYES, Jon Waverley PC SALA, Adrien St.
    [Show full text]
  • Red River Valley Water Supply Project Class I Cultural Resources Inventory and Assessment, Eastern North Dakota and Nortwestern Minnesota
    RED RIVER VALLEY WATER SUPPLY PROJECT CLASS I CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT, EASTERN NORTH DAKOTA AND NORTWESTERN MINNESOTA Michael A. Jackson, Dennis L. Toom, and Cynthia Kordecki December 2006 ABSTRACT In 2004-2006, personnel from Anthropology Research, Department of Anthropology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, conducted a Class I inventory (file search) for the Red River Valley Water Supply Project (RRVWSP). This work was carried out in cooperation with the USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Dakotas Area Office, Bismarck, ND. The file search dealt with hundreds of cultural resource sites across much of eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota. Archeological sites, architectural sites, site leads, and isolated finds were examined for 14 North Dakota counties and four Minnesota counties. Five different action alternatives were investigated to determine the number and types of previously recorded cultural resources located within each. Each alternative was ranked in terms of its potential to cause impacts to cultural resources, both known and (presently) unknown. Analysis indicated that the Red River Basin Alternative (#3) has the largest potential for cultural resource site impacts. From a least-impact cultural resources perspective, the other four alternatives represent the best, least-impact options for construction of the RRVWSP. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................................................ii
    [Show full text]
  • Sandpiper Pipeline: Comparison of Environmental Effects of Reasonable Alternatives
    Sandpiper Pipeline: Comparison of Environmental Effects of Reasonable Alternatives In the Matter of the Application of North Dakota Pipeline Company LLC for a Certificate of Need for the Sandpiper Pipeline Project in Minnesota Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Docket CN-13-473 Minnesota Department of Commerce Energy Environmental Review and Analysis | December 2014 Sandpiper Pipeline: Comparison of Environmental Effects of Reasonable Alternatives Abstract North Dakota Pipeline Company LLC (NDPC) is proposing to construct the Sandpiper Project, a 565 to 608-mile long pipeline and associated facilities from the Tioga, North Dakota, through Minnesota to Superior, Wisconsin. On November 8, 2013, NDPC filed two applications with the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (Commission): the first for a Certificate of Need (CN) and the second for a pipeline route permit for the project. The CN rules at Minn. R. 7853.0130 require, in determining if a certificate of need should be granted, that consideration be paid to the “natural and socioeconomic environments compared to the effects of reasonable alternatives,” and “the effect of the proposed facility, or a suitable modification of it, upon the natural and socioeconomic environments compared to the effect of not building the facility.” For the Sandpiper Project, the Commission concluded that an environmental analysis of six system alternatives, which were identified in the Route Permit docket, and six alternatives to the proposed project identified by NDPC in its CN application would provide it with valuable information to be weighed along with other information while making its need decision. This document is intended to provide that analysis. It is intended for the use of any party who chooses to advocate for or against consideration of an alternative in the certificate of need docket.
    [Show full text]
  • Abandoned Channels of the Lower Sheyenne River Statewide Lidar Coverage Offers Detailed Picture of North Dakota’S Deglacial History
    Abandoned Channels of the Lower Sheyenne River Statewide LiDAR coverage offers detailed picture of North Dakota’s deglacial history Levi D. Moxness The Sheyenne River as we know it today is a relatively small, and shallow groundwater sources, that may be tens of miles from slow-moving, and unassuming watercourse when not in flood the modern Sheyenne River. Recently acquired, high-resolution stage; its 591 miles of meanders, the longest course of any Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data reveals the surface of river within the state, are a familiar fixture of the southeastern North Dakota in unprecedented detail, offering not only a clearer North Dakota landscape. Early in its geologic history, however, picture of its recent geologic history, but increased precision in the river would have looked very different. Over the course of the characterization of its surficial geologic resources. only a few thousand years, the Sheyenne distributed glacial meltwater, surface runoff, and sediment from North Dakota to In contrast to the unglaciated southwestern portion of the state, the Missouri River, the Mississippi River, the Great Lakes, the where major landscape features have been sculpted by hundreds Arctic Ocean, and eventually Hudson Bay via various former of thousands of years of mostly gradual erosion, the surface of channels and glacial lake outlets (fig. 1). These early river phases eastern North Dakota was formed comparatively recently, and left behind sands and gravels, heavily-utilized today as aggregate much more rapidly. At the close of the Last Glacial Maximum between 18,000 and 14,000 years ago, the southwestern margin of the Laurentide Ice Sheet melted back from the Missouri Coteau and drainageways established themselves over much of east-central North Dakota.
    [Show full text]