Cinema and Audience, Sociological Debate Jak Şalom 2020-2021 #1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cinema and Audience, Sociological Debate Jak Şalom 2020-2021 #1 FA 491 - Cinema and Audience, Sociological Debate Jak Şalom 2020-2021 #1 The following syllabus was written on September 1, 2020, based on the information available on that date. It is subject to change with regard to dates and, to a lesser extent, content. The academic calendar informs us that classes will start on October 22. It seems that these will take place remotely. We will adapt the course when necessary. 70% attendance will be required on Moodle by checking the “attendance” box. You will be subject to two checks: the first, mid-term, by a paper assignment; the second, in the form of a "final paper" if the teaching is still organized remotely at the end of the term. The documentation relating to each course will be at your disposal on Moodle, one week in advance. A good knowledge of world cinema is required of all candidates who wish to register for this course. Priority will be given to students registered for the "film certificate". The total number of registrants will depend on the instructions of the school administration. Thank you for your attention. Jak Şalom 1 Week 1 – 2020-10-27 Introduction Week 2 – 2020-11-03 The first years of cinema and audience reactions Week 3 – 2020-11-10 Movie theaters Week 4 – 2020-11-17 Cinematheques, cinephilia - Turkish Cinematheque and its founder Onat Kutlar Week 5 – 2020-11-24 Cinema and countries, changing audience practices: Turkey Week 6 – 2020-12-01 Cinema and countries, changing audience practices: Other countries 1 Week 7 – 2020-12-08 Cinema and countries, changing audience practices: Other countries 2 Week 8 – 2020-12-15 Cinema movements trying to change audience habits Week 9 – 2020-12-22 Cinema and revolutionary activity Week 10 – 2020-12-29 Cinema and festivals Week 11 – 2021-01-05 Cinema and cultural studies 1 Week 12 – 2021-01-12 Cinema and cultural studies 2 Week 13 – 2021-01-19 Cinema and other artistic forms 2 Cinema and Audience, Sociological Debate Week 1 Introduction Course description: Perhaps the most important particularity of the cinema as an artistic field may Be its collective nature during its production process and at the same time it is also consumed in a collective way, many people come together as film audience to watch these movies4... This characteristic helps it to Become an agency for live dialogue Between human Beings. Directors aiming to transmit their Beliefs, ideas and sentiments to large masses thanks to their movies need the help of many people from different fields and people from different classes, ages, professions watch these films together in movie theaters5. This course would like to concentrate into relationship Between audience and artist, following the traces of main institutions of the history of cinema like cinematheques, cluBs and reviews6 7. These opportunities provided By cinema, the capacity of movies to shape human Beings lives, minds and life-styles deserve to Be elaborated8. During this course, many important movies will Be analyzed. 1 Cinema means sitting in the middle of an audience that breath, gasps, giggles, sucking candy, bother you, enter, leave, perhaps read loudly cartons as it was at the silent movies; cinema is those people, plus a story that happens on the screen" ( Cesare Pavese - Il Realismo italiano nel cinema e nella narrativa (Cinema nuovo - 1953). 2 “First, the films are never individual products. [...] To the extent that each production unit of a film embodies a mixture of heterogeneous interests and inclinations, teamwork in this area tends to exclude the arbitrary handling of the film material by removing individual features for aspects common to many people" (Siegfried Kracauer - From Caligari to Hitler: A Psychological History of the German Film,1947) 3"The subject who speaks here must recognize one thing: he likes to get out of a movie theater. He walks quietly (he does not like to talk about the film they have just seen), a little numb, encased, chilly, short sleepy; he’s sleepy, that's what he thinks; his body became something sporty, sweet, peaceful: soft like a sleeping cat, it feels somewhat disjointed [...]. In short, it comes out of hypnosis " (Roland Barthes - Communications n°23 - 1975). 4"In the egalitarian discomfort of the popular theatres, I had learned that this new art was to me, as to all" (Jean- Paul Sartre - Les Mots - 1964) 5 We see, here again, how objective cinema and fiction films are opposed and bind. The image is strictly the reflect of the reality, its objectivity is in contradiction with the extravagance of what is imaginary. At the same time, this reflection is a "double". The image is already soaked by subjective powers that will move it, distort it, project it into fantasy and dream " (Edgar Morin - Le cinéma ou l'homme imaginaire - 1956). 3 Reading list: Requested: • Siegfried Kracauer, From Caligari to Hitler: A Psychological History of the German Film, 2004, Princeton University Press. Suggested: • Pierre Bourdieu, Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field, Stanford University Press, 1996. • Pierre Bourdieu, « Mais qui a créé les créateurs ? », Questions de sociologie, Éditions de Minuit, 1984 (p. 207-221) Screening list: Requested: • Das Cabinet des Dr. Caligari, dir. RoBert Wiene, Germany, 1919, 1 h 18 (https://www.youtuBe.com/watch?v=AP3WDQXkJq4) • 120 years watching movies together, https://vimeo.com/115470918, 2015, 3’48’’ Suggested: • Cinema Paradiso, dir. Giuseppe Tornatore, Italy 1989, 2 h 04 (http://www.youmoviz.tv/14858/stream-cinema-paradiso/) 4 Week 2 The first years of cinema and audience reactions Course description: The history of film Began in the 1890's, with the invention of motion picture cameras and the establishment of film production companies. The films of the 1890s were under a minute long and until 1927, motion pictures were produced without sound. The first eleven years of motion pictures show the cinema moving from a novelty to an established large-scale entertainment industry. The films Became several minutes long consisting of several shots. The first rotating camera for taking panning shots was Built in 1897. The first film studios were Built in 1897. Special effects were introduced and film continuity, involving action moving from one sequence into another, Began to Be used. In 1900, continuity of action across successive shots was achieved and the close-up shot was introduced (that some claim D. W. Griffith invented). Most films of this period were what came to Be called "chase films". The first use of animation in movies was in 1899. The first feature length multi-reel film was a 1906 Australian production. The first successful permanent theatre showing only films was "The Nickelodeon" in PittsBurgh in 1905. By about 1910, actors Began to receive screen credit for their roles, and the way to the creation of film stars was opened. Regular newsreels were exhiBited from 1910 and soon Became a popular way for finding out the news. Overall, from about 1910, American films had the largest share of the market in all European countries except France. **** A sociological approach to the audience practice of the first spectators The history of film perfectly illustrates the struggle of class and image. This approach is central to the theory of cultural legitimacy of Pierre Bourdieu. He argues that the practice of a cultural activity depends on the degree of legitimacy and social position of those who practice. In the case of cinema, this theory maintains a particular resonance to understand the relationship Between the Bourgeois classes and popular classes with cinema. The cinema rapidly emerges as a major invention in the world of entertainment. But it will take time to move from mere curiosity plagued By a high social class snoBBery than entertainment artistic vocation. In fact, it will take nearly thirty years that the institutions (critics, historians, film cluBs...) will Be part of a cinema culture going Beyond upper classes. Reading list : Requested: • A sociology of the cinema / The Bioscope.net / 2012 (a Blog on early and silent cinema, with an emphasis on research) / (http://theBioscope.net/2012/08/11/a-sociology-of-the- cinema/) • Gaudreault, André, American cinema, 1890-1909: themes and variations, Rutgers University Press, 2009. Suggested: 5 • Jean-Pierre Esquenazi, Sociologie des publics, La découverte, 2003 •Emmanuel Ethis, Sociologie du cinéma et de ses publics, Armand Colin, Coll.128, 2014 (3eme édition). Screening list: Requested: • L’arrivée d’un train en gare de La Ciotat / Frères Lumière / 1895 (https://www.youtuBe.com/watch?v=b9MoAQJFn_8) • La sortie des usines Lumière (http://www.lepoint.fr/culture/les-trois-versions-de-la-sortie- des-usines-lumiere-27-03-2015-1916316_3.php) •Voyage dans la lune, dir. Georges Méliés, 1902, B&w (http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xBv03c_ georges-melies-le-voyage-dans-la- lu_shortfilms) •Voyage dans la lune, dir. Georges Méliés, 1902, color https://www.youtuBe.com/watch?v=L-xKECueJPo •Hugo, dir. Martin Scorsese, 2011 (http://www.streamcomplet.eu/streaming-hugo-cabret.php) 6 Week 3 Movie theaters Course description: A movie theater or movie theatre (also called a cinema, movie house, film house, film theater or picture house) is a venue, usually a Building, for viewing movies (films), for entertainment. Most But not all movie theaters are commercial operations catering to the general puBlic, who attend By purchasing a ticket. The movie is projected with a movie projector onto a large projection screen at the front of the auditorium. Most movie theaters are now equipped for digital cinema projection, removing the need to create and transport a physical film print. In Turkey, in 2014 there are 2.034 cinema screens and 276.318 cinema seats. Big movie theatres could not Be survived and new cinema complexes including many small theatres replace them.
Recommended publications
  • Representing History and the Filmmaker in the Frame
    REPRESENTING HISTORY AND THE FILMMAKER IN THE FRAME Trent Griffiths* Resumo: A presença do realizador no enquadramento representa uma relação única entre o documentário e a História em que o realizador se envolve na história social através da sua experiência pessoal e enquanto autor de uma representação. O realizador no enquadramento é, também, um representante do momento histórico, ao explorar de modo reflexivo o encontro com o processo de mediação e auto-representação que caracteriza a sociedade pós-moderna. Palavras-chave: subjetividade, auto-reflexividade, realizador no enquadramento. Resumen: La presencia del director en el encuadre representa una relación úni- ca entre el documental y la historia, en la cual el director se involucra en la historia social a través de su experiencia personal como autor de una representación. El director en el encuadre es también un representante del momento histórico, al explorar de modo reflexivo el encuentro con el proceso de mediación y auto-representación que caracteriza a la sociedad posmoderna. Palabras clave: subjetividad, auto-reflexividad, director en el encuadre. Abstract: The presence of the filmmaker as a subject in the documentary frame represents a unique relationship between documentary film and history, where the filmmaker engages with social history through their personal experience of authoring a representation of it. This paper explores how the tension between the filmmaker’s presence as an author and as a subject enacts a kind of self-reflexivity that recasts the possibilities of representing history through documentary film. Keywords: Subjectivity, self-reflexivity, filmmaker in the frame. Résumé: La présence du réalisateur dans l’image cinématographique témoigne d’une relation unique entre documentaire et histoire : le réalisateur s’engage dans l’his- toire sociale à travers d’une expérience personnelle et comme auteur d’une représen- tation.
    [Show full text]
  • CRITERION COLLECTION PRESENTS the Ballad of Narayama
    AVAILABLE on BLU-RAY AnD DVD! THE CRITERION COLLECTION PRESENTS ThE BALLAD of NarayamA THE GORGEOUS JAPANESE CLASSIC— NEVER BEFORE ON BLU-RAY OR DVD! This haunting, kabuki-inflected version of a Japanese folk legend is set in a remote mountain village, where food is scarce and tradition dictates that citizens who have reached their seventieth year must be carried to the summit of Mount Narayama and left there to die. The sacrificial elder at the center of the tale is Orin (Ugetsu’s KINUYO TANAKA), a dignified and dutiful woman who spends her dwindling days securing the happiness of her loyal widowed son with a respectable new wife. Filmed almost entirely on cunningly designed studio sets, in brilliant color and widescreen, The Ballad of Narayama is a stylish and vividly formal work from Japan’s cinematic golden age, directed by the dynamic KEISUKE KINOSHITA (Twenty-four Eyes). “A startling, culturally resonant SPECIAL EDITION FEATURES magnum opus.” · New 4K digital master from the 2011 restoration, —Cannes Film Festival with uncompressed monaural soundtrack on the Blu-ray edition · Trailer and teaser “Unforgettable . One of · New English subtitle translation Kinoshita’s boldest films.” · PLUS: A booklet featuring an essay by critic —Film Society of Lincoln Center Philip Kemp WINNER BLU-RAY EDITION SRP $29.95 Best FILM, Best Director, PREBOOK 1/8/13 STREET 2/5/13 Best Actress, Cat. NO. CC2228BD KINEMA JUNPO Awards, 1958 ISBN 978-1-60465-687-9 UPC 7-15515-10251-3 WINNER Best FILM, Best Director, DVD EDITION SRP $19.95 MAINICHI FILM Concours, 1958 PREBOOK 1/8/13 STREET 2/5/13 Cat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Documentaries II Instructor: Michael Fox Mondays, 12 Noon-1:30Pm, June 7-28, 2021 [email protected]
    The Great Documentaries II Instructor: Michael Fox Mondays, 12 noon-1:30pm, June 7-28, 2021 [email protected] With nonfiction films entrenched as a genre of mainstream movie entertainment, we examine standouts of the contemporary documentary. The five-session lineup is comprised of a trio of films about recent historical events bookended by personal documentaries. This lecture and discussion class (students will view the films on their own prior to class) encompasses perennial issues such as the responsibility of the filmmaker to his/her subject, the slipperiness of truth, the tools of storytelling and the use of poetry and metaphor in nonfiction. Four of the films can be streamed for free (three on Kanopy, one on Hoopla) and the other can be rented from Amazon Prime and other platforms. All the films are probably available via Netflix’s DVD plan. The Great Documentaries II is a historical survey that follows and builds on Documentary Touchstones I and II, which I taught at OLLI a few years ago. I’ve appended a list of those films and more information at the end of the syllabus, if you have never seen them and wish to journey further back into the history of documentaries. Most of the titles are available to watch for free on YouTube, although the quality of the prints varies. June 7 Sherman’s March (1986, Ross McElwee, 158 min) Kanopy After his girlfriend leaves him, McElwee voyages along the original route followed by Gen. William Sherman. Rather than cutting a swath of destruction designed to force the Confederate South into submission, McElwee searches for love, camera in hand, “training his lens with phallic resolve on every accessible woman he meets.” Grand Jury Prize at Sundance, named one of the Top 20 docs of all time by the International Documentary Association, added to the Library of Congress National Film Registry in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Part Two: Synaesthetic Cinema: the End of Drama
    PART TWO: SYNAESTHETIC CINEMA: THE END OF DRAMA "The final poem will be the poem of fact in the language of fact. But it will be the poem of fact not realized before." WALLACE STEVENS Expanded cinema has been expanding for a long time. Since it left the underground and became a popular avant-garde form in the late 1950's the new cinema primarily has been an exercise in technique, the gradual development of a truly cinematic language with which to expand further man's communicative powers and thus his aware- ness. If expanded cinema has had anything to say, the message has been the medium.1 Slavko Vorkapich: "Most of the films made so far are examples not of creative use of motion-picture devices and techniques, but of their use as recording instruments only. There are extremely few motion pictures that may be cited as instances of creative use of the medium, and from these only fragments and short passages may be compared to the best achievements in the other arts."2 It has taken more than seventy years for global man to come to terms with the cinematic medium, to liberate it from theatre and literature. We had to wait until our consciousness caught up with our technology. But although the new cinema is the first and only true cinematic language, it still is used as a recording instrument. The recorded subject, however, is not the objective external human con- dition but the filmmaker's consciousness, his perception and its pro- 1 For a comprehensive in-depth history of this development, see: Sheldon Renan, An Introduction to the American Underground Film (New York: Dutton Paperbacks, 1967).
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Heider - Ethnographic Film
    ethnographic film TT3867.indb3867.indb i 88/21/06/21/06 112:47:202:47:20 PPMM THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ethnographic film Revised Edition by karl g. heider university of texas press Austin TT3867.indb3867.indb iiiiii 88/21/06/21/06 112:47:202:47:20 PPMM Copyright © 1976, 2006 by the University of Texas Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Revised edition, 2006 Requests for permission to reproduce material from this work should be sent to: Permissions University of Texas Press P.O. Box 7819 Austin, TX 78713– 7819 www.utexas.edu/utpress/about/bpermission.html ᭺ϱ The paper used in this book meets the minimum requirements of ansi/niso z39.48 – 1992 (r1997) (Permanence of Paper). library of congress cataloging-in-publication data Heider, Karl G., 1935– Ethnographic fi lm / by Karl G. Heider. — Rev. ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn-13: 978-0-292-71458-8 ((pbk.) : alk. paper) isbn-10: 0-292-71458-o 1. Motion pictures in ethnology. 2. Motion pictures in ethnology–Study and teaching. I. Title. gn347.h44 2006 305.8 –dc22 2006019479 TT3867.indb3867.indb iivv 88/21/06/21/06 112:47:212:47:21 PPMM To Robert Gardner And to the memory of Jean Rouch John Marshall Timothy Asch TT3867.indb3867.indb v 88/21/06/21/06 112:47:222:47:22 PPMM THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK contents preface ix acknowledgments xv 1. introduction 1 Toward a Definition: The Nature of the Category “Ethnographic Film” 1 The Nature of Ethnography 4 The Differing Natures of Ethnography and Film 8 “Truth” in Film and Ethnography 10 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Supercut of Supercuts: Aesthetics, Histories, Databases
    A Supercut of Supercuts: Aesthetics, Histories, Databases PRACTICE RESEARCH MAX TOHLINE ABSTRACT CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Max Tohline The genealogies of the supercut, which extend well past YouTube compilations, back Independent scholar, US to the 1920s and beyond, reveal it not as an aesthetic that trickled from avant-garde [email protected] experimentation into mass entertainment, but rather the material expression of a newly-ascendant mode of knowledge and power: the database episteme. KEYWORDS: editing; supercut; compilation; montage; archive; database TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Tohline, M. 2021. A Supercut of Supercuts: Aesthetics, Histories, Databases. Open Screens, 4(1): 8, pp. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/os.45 Tohline Open Screens DOI: 10.16995/os.45 2 Full Transcript: https://www.academia.edu/45172369/Tohline_A_Supercut_of_Supercuts_full_transcript. Tohline Open Screens DOI: 10.16995/os.45 3 RESEARCH STATEMENT strong patterning in supercuts focuses viewer attention toward that which repeats, stoking uncritical desire for This first inklings of this video essay came in the form that repetition, regardless of the content of the images. of a one-off blog post I wrote seven years ago (Tohline While critical analysis is certainly possible within the 2013) in response to Miklos Kiss’s work on the “narrative” form, the supercut, broadly speaking, naturally gravitates supercut (Kiss 2013). My thoughts then comprised little toward desire instead of analysis. more than a list; an attempt to add a few works to Armed with this conclusion, part two sets out to the prehistory of the supercut that I felt Kiss and other discover the various roots of the supercut with this supercut researchers or popularizers, like Tom McCormack desire-centered-ness, and other pragmatics, as a guide.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Documentaries Instructor: Michael Fox Tuesdays, 2:30-4:00Pm, January 19-March 9, 2021 [email protected]
    The Great Documentaries Instructor: Michael Fox Tuesdays, 2:30-4:00pm, January 19-March 9, 2021 [email protected] With nonfiction films entrenched as a genre of mainstream movie entertainment, we revisit the pivotal films that established the technique, tone and tenor of the modern documentary. From Frederick Wiseman’s Titicut Follies (1967) to Werner Herzog’s Grizzly Man (2005), this screening, lecture and discussion class appraises key works of lasting power and influence. The discussion will encompass perennial issues such as the responsibility of the filmmaker to the subject, truth and storytelling, the thin line between observation and activism and our evolving relationship to images. The Great Documentaries is a historical survey that follows and builds on Documentary Touchstones I and II, which I taught at OLLI a few years ago. I’ve appended a list of those films—if you have never seen them and wish to journey further back in the history of documentaries—and more information at the end of the syllabus. Most of the titles are available to watch for free on YouTube, although the quality of the prints varies. Jan. 19 Titicut Follies (1967, Frederick Wiseman, 84 min) Kanopy Wiseman’s debut film is a stark and graphic portrayal of the conditions that existed at the State Prison for the Criminally Insane at Bridgewater, Mass, documenting the various ways the inmates are treated by the guards, social workers and psychiatrists. “A great work, a near-masterpiece not just of the documentary form but of moviemaking in any category. It's a film that transcends the time and place of its manufacture, and it should be seen not just by documentarians and film students but by anyone interested in the movies as a medium capable of powerfully presenting the human condition.” - Ray Greene, Village View A Boston native and graduate of Williams College and Yale Law School, Frederick Wiseman is in the pantheon of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Aitken, Mark. 2019. Emotional Truths in Documentary Making. Doctoral Thesis, Goldsmiths, Uni- Versity of London [Thesis] Https
    Aitken, Mark. 2019. Emotional truths in documentary making. Doctoral thesis, Goldsmiths, Uni- versity of London [Thesis] https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/27688/ The version presented here may differ from the published, performed or presented work. Please go to the persistent GRO record above for more information. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Goldsmiths, University of London via the following email address: [email protected]. The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated. For more information, please contact the GRO team: [email protected] Emotional truths in documentary making Mark Aitken - 22228387 PhD by Publication Media and Communications Goldsmiths, University of London 30.08.19. i Declaration of Authorship I (Mark Aitken) hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: Date: 30.08.19 ii Mark Aitken Media and Communications Goldsmiths, University of London PhD by Publication Supervisors: Prof Tony Dowmunt, Dr Gareth Stanton Abstract Emotional truths in documentary making The abundance of documentary making and instability of ‘truths’ in the current ‘post-truth’ era suggests a need to reconsider past and present epistemological claims by non-fiction. Burdens of documentary ‘truth’ were shed in favour of subjective ‘truths’ advocated by film makers and subjects. Documentary ‘truths’ are defined as performative but we should accept the possibility of ‘untrue’ performance. Audience interpretation of performative ‘truths’ also proves to be relative to belief and emotions.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download the PDF File
    Abstract An Opposition in Search of Itself: Modern French Cinema and the Algerian War This dissertation provides a sustained analysis of the politics of French cinema in the 1950s and 1960s from the socio-historical perspective of the Franco-Algerian War. By combining close visual analysis of the Left Bank Group’s cinema, discourse analysis of contemporaneous film theoretical debates, and archival research of images from the popular press, I demonstrate how the Franco-Algerian War played a key role in shaping the cinematic representation of French modernization. Although it has been widely assumed that France’s “police operation” in Algeria between 1954 and 1962 was absent from French screens due to severe censorship restrictions, I explore how filmmakers including Alain Resnais, Agnès Varda, and Chris Marker mobilize imagery and discourses unique to the war in order to critique the disciplinary nature of their own “modern society.” In its focus on colonialism, my dissertation challenges the dominant narrative of this influential period in film history as a monolithic New Wave movement reducible to the films of an inner-circle of auteurs and their writings in Cahiers du cinéma. I return to the journal Positif’s under-theorized criticism to illuminate how film culture in France functioned as a heterogeneous field of debate, in which political divisions were largely determined in relation to the question of colonialism’s relationship to modernization. The 1950s mark the flourishing of Les Trente Glorieuses in France, a period of economic acceleration, which contemporary media ii representation often cast in the ambience of science fiction. As the specificities of France’s “dirty war” in Algeria permeated the mainland, however, the frontier dividing the two became increasingly precarious.
    [Show full text]
  • Abraham Lincoln, 27 Adam's Rib, 5
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-82022-6 - The “I” of the Camera: Essays in Film Criticism, History, and Aesthetics: Second Edition William Rothman Index More information Index Abraham Lincoln, 27 Batkin, Norton, xxx Adam’s Rib, 5, 7, 56, 171, 173, 176, Bazin, Andre,´ 131, 285, 322, 323, 200 325, 350 Allen, Woody, 52n Beavers, Louise, 98, 100, 104, 105, American film, “Americanness” of, 268 1–10, 55–7, 146–7, 359–65, Beethoven, Ludwig van, 12 372–80 Bel Geddes, Barbara, 257 Andrews, Dana, 134 Bellamy, Ralph, 170 Anger, Kenneth, 70 Beloved Rogue, The, 80 Antonioni, Michelangelo, 325 Belton, John, 111 Apartment, The, 178–80, 185, 192, Benny, Jack, 352 193–205 Bergman, Ingrid, 226, 255, 257, 298, Apu trilogy, 358 326 Aravindan, G., 364 Berkeley, Busby, 170 Ascher, Steve, 283 Bhagavad Gita, The, 206 Astaire, Fred, 170, 193 Big Sky, The, 114, 115, 116 Astor, Mary, 69–73 Big Sleep, The, 112–4, 120, 121 Auerbach, Nina, 94–5 Birds, The, 234, 242, 257 Austen, Jane, 30 Birri, Fernando, 342 Avenging Conscience, The, 22 Birth of a Nation, The, xxix, 3, 11–16, Awful Truth, The, 5, 56, 170, 171 22, 29, 39, 78, 82, 83, 349, 362 Biskind, Peter, 7–8 Bacall, Lauren, 114, 120, 158–9, Bitzer, Billy, 24–5 161–5 Blackmail, 20, 242, 258 Baker, Carlos, 161 Block, Mitchell, 297 Ball of Fire, 113, 115, 119 Blonde Venus, 6, 55, 56, 59, 62–5, Barbary Coast, 114, 118, 121 302; role of African Americans Barnouw, Erik, 3 in, 96, 100–2, 107 Barrymore, John, 80, 84, 113, 114, Blue Angel, The, 84 120, 298 Bogart, Humphrey, 119, 120;inTo Barrymore, Lionel, 24 Have and
    [Show full text]
  • Chronicle of a Summer (1960) As Autocritique (1959): a Transition in the French Left
    Quarterly Review of film and Video, 21:173-185, 2004 Copyright (<) Taylor & Francis Inc. ISSN: 1050-9208 print/1543-5326 online ~~ ~~o~;~~n~~~up DOl: I 0.1080/10509200490437826 Chronicle of a Summer (1960) as Autocritique (1959): A Transition in the French Left IVONE MARGULIES A longhaired woman nervously bites her lips, smokes and hesitates in painfully long pauses. When she does talk, it is about her sense of alienation. This image of confession sums up cinema verite's unique modernity, its split between document and drama. Mag­ nified through the close proximity of the camera, this long take bespeaks an unflinching attention halfway between trial and compassionate hearing. Chronicle r~f a Summer (Edgar Morin, Jean Rouch, 1960) is, in fact, charged with a project of self-revision as no other film. The film was to be "an experiment lived by its authors and its actors, a sort of psychodrama carried out collectively among authors and actors" (Morin, "Chronicle" 6). At the end of our research" states Edgar Morin in his proposal for the film, "we will gather our characters and ... will show them what has been filmed so far, and in doing so attempt the ultimate ... explication. Did each of them learn something about him/herself? ... Did our faces remain masks?" ("Chronicle" 6). Morin and Rouch's experiment with the consciousness-awakening potential of the medium, the projection of the scene and the debate among the participants, reveals instead a profound collective embarrassment. The probing camera is blamed for only getting the "tiniest spark of truth when the subject is on the verge of a nervous breakdown," and the verite method is reproached for eliciting "scenes that are either artificial or indecent." Confirming that this film approach invites questions of performance and authenticity, Jean-Pierre provocatively suggests that Marceline's dramatic dialogue works only because she was acting.
    [Show full text]
  • FILM 4260 - History of Cinema II Prof
    FILM 4260 - History of Cinema II Prof. Rielle Navitski Spring 2018 [email protected] Class: MWF 9:05 – 9:55 am in 53 Fine Arts Screening: W 3:35 – 5:30 pm in 53 Fine Arts Office hours: M 12:30 – 2:30 and W 10-12 or by appointment in 260 Fine Arts Course Description: This course provides an overview of key developments in world cinema from World War II through the present, examining profound transformations in film style and narrative, in how films were made and found audiences across the globe, and in cinema’s relationship to politics and changing conceptions of art. Although the class focuses on narrative fiction film, we will also examine documentary and experimental cinema. We will first study the restructuring of the Hollywood industry in the late 1940s and early 1950s in response to the Paramount anti-trust case and the popularization of television. We will then examine how other postwar cinemas – Italian neorealism, Japanese film, and Mexican cinema – gained new prominence internationally through film festivals, arthouses, and new approaches to film criticism, including the celebration of the director as auteur. In the following unit, we will study the New Waves of the 1960s and 1970s, examining how filmmakers in Europe, Africa, and Latin America developed new narrative and stylistic strategies for both artistic and political reasons. In our third unit, we will focus on industrial and aesthetic shifts in Hollywood from the 1960s to the present, examining the emergence of the “New Hollywood,” the rise of the blockbuster, transformations brought about by home video, and the development of independent filmmaking.
    [Show full text]