To Download the PDF File

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

To Download the PDF File Abstract An Opposition in Search of Itself: Modern French Cinema and the Algerian War This dissertation provides a sustained analysis of the politics of French cinema in the 1950s and 1960s from the socio-historical perspective of the Franco-Algerian War. By combining close visual analysis of the Left Bank Group’s cinema, discourse analysis of contemporaneous film theoretical debates, and archival research of images from the popular press, I demonstrate how the Franco-Algerian War played a key role in shaping the cinematic representation of French modernization. Although it has been widely assumed that France’s “police operation” in Algeria between 1954 and 1962 was absent from French screens due to severe censorship restrictions, I explore how filmmakers including Alain Resnais, Agnès Varda, and Chris Marker mobilize imagery and discourses unique to the war in order to critique the disciplinary nature of their own “modern society.” In its focus on colonialism, my dissertation challenges the dominant narrative of this influential period in film history as a monolithic New Wave movement reducible to the films of an inner-circle of auteurs and their writings in Cahiers du cinéma. I return to the journal Positif’s under-theorized criticism to illuminate how film culture in France functioned as a heterogeneous field of debate, in which political divisions were largely determined in relation to the question of colonialism’s relationship to modernization. The 1950s mark the flourishing of Les Trente Glorieuses in France, a period of economic acceleration, which contemporary media ii representation often cast in the ambience of science fiction. As the specificities of France’s “dirty war” in Algeria permeated the mainland, however, the frontier dividing the two became increasingly precarious. By placing the mise-en-scènes of the modern world – its museums, its department stores, its cultures of objects – in a dialectical tension with images of policing, torture, and concentration camps, the Left Bank Group demonstrate how the horrors of the counter-insurgency in Algeria permeated everyday life in the metropole. The conclusion of the dissertation considers how the Left Bank Group’s encounter with the Algerian War conditioned their militant film practice at the end of the 1960s (Loin du Vietnam, 1967), and defines René Vautier’s “parallel cinema” as a necessary future direction for the study of anti-colonial cinema. iii Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank my supervisor, Chris Faulkner, who guided this project with his meticulous commentary and pragmatic advice since its inception. Chris’s supervision will inform the broader, long lasting attitudes and concerns that I bring to my future scholarship. I must also thank my co-supervisor Marc Furstenau, for engaging with me in countless hours of discussion and for his ongoing support. In addition, the members of my committee offered a number of the conceptual and historical threads that came to define this dissertation. Thanks to Aboubakar Sanogo for emphasizing the crucial salience of Positif’s and Jean-Paul Sartre’s writings, as well as René Vautier’s cinema to my interpretive framework during our committee’s first meeting. Jill Carrick’s suggestion to situate the Left Bank Group’s films in relation to contemporaneous literary and artistic movements also had a major influence on my subsequent research. Finally, I am extremely grateful to my external examiner, Adam Lowenstein, for his thoughtful and enthusiastic engagement with the final project. Along with my doctoral committee, a number of the faculty members at Carleton University played a significant role in cultivating my interest in the relationship between European cinema and colonialism. I extend a heartfelt thanks to Barbara Gabriel, who first encouraged and sharpened my thinking on this subject at a very early stage. I thank Charles O’Brien for his interest and for introducing me to some of the period’s films that I have since considered in detail. Faculty members at other universities have also been extremely helpful in their comments, ideas, and iv encouragement, and I am particularly grateful to Mark Betz, Kass Banning, D.N. Rodowick, Erika Balsom, Catherine Russell, and Catherine Grant. This dissertation was born of a communal effort, and I have to thank my amazing colleagues for all of the ways that they helped me see it through, especially: Scott Birdwise, Bruno Cornellier, Owen Livermore, Papagena Robbins, Jenny Wills, David Richler, Ezra Winton, Alison Harvey, Kevin Wynter, Erika Balsom, Nathan Holmes, Svetla Turnin, Andrew Covert, Adam Rosadiuk, Charlie Ellbé, Peter Lester, Andrea Zeffiro, Mél Hogan, Theresa Scandiffio, Owen Lyons, Jeremy Maron, Heather Igloliorte, Jessica Aldred, Murray Leeder, Liz Clarke, Danielle Wiley, Émilie Nollet, and Thorsten Busch. I also extend a very special thanks to Oriane Brun- Moschetti and Orlan Roy for their hospitality and for providing me with a number of René Vautier films that I would never have had the opportunity to see otherwise. Finally, it is my pleasure to thank the family members who helped me throughout this whole process. I devote an immense thanks to my mother, Shirley Croombs, who has always been there for me, but never more so than over the course of this project. I give an equally strong thanks to Larrie and Mika Shepherd, whose steadfast support nearing the end of my writing is what enabled me to meet the final deadline. A necessary thanks goes out to long-time friends, Louis Calabro, Matt Cully, and Marcelo Sanchez. And, above all, thanks to Tamara Shepherd, my love and undisputed champion. Your effort and patience have been supernatural throughout these last four years, and I can’t wait to show you my appreciation during our adventures in the future. v Table of Contents Abstract ii Acknowledgements iv Table of Contents vi List of Figures vii Introduction 1 Chapter 1 An Opposition in Search of Itself: Modernization, Decolonization, Cinema 39 Chapter 2 French-Algeria and the Police: Horror as Political Affect in Three Short Documentaries by Alain Resnais 83 Chapter 3 La Jetée in Historical Time: Colonialism, Consumerism, Displacement 114 Chapter 4 Colonial Abjection: The Question of Torture in Modern French Cinema 144 Chapter 5 Loin du Vietnam: Solidarity, Representation, and the Proximity of the French Colonial Past 173 Conclusion 199 Bibliography 221 vi List of Figures Figure 1. Still from Jacques Tati’s Playtime (1967) 22 Figure 2. Advertisement in L’Express, August 30, 1957 43 Figure 3. Still from 2 ou 3 choses que je sais d’elle (1967) 54 Figure 4. Still from Cléo de 5 à 7 (1962) 64 Figure 5. Advertisement in L’Express, September 13, 1957 69 Figure 6. Photo in L’Express, 3 October 1957 81 Figure 7. Photo in L’Express, 21 February 1962 81 Figure 8. Still from Toute la mémoire du monde (1956) 87 Figure 9. Still from Toute la mémoire du monde (1956) 87 Figure 10. Still from Toute la mémoire du monde (1956) 87 Figure 11. Still from Toute la mémoire du monde (1956) 92 Figure 12. Still from Toute la mémoire du monde (1956) 93 Figure 13. Cover of L’Express, September 15, 1960 94 Figure 14. Still from Les statues meurent aussi (1953) 101 Figure 15. Still from Les statues meurent aussi (1953) 101 Figure 16. Still from La Jetée (1962) 124 Figure 17. Still from La Jetée (1962) 124 Figure 18. Still from Fahrenheit 451 (1966) 127 Figure 19. Advertisement in L’Express, 1960 130 Figure 20. Still from La Jetée (1962) 131 Figure 21. Still from La Jetée (1962) 139 Figure 22. Still from La Jetée (1962) 141 Figure 23. Photo by Robert Capa, Spanish Civil War 142 Figure 24. Photo from the archives of Le Monde 155 Figure 25. Still from Muriel, ou le temps d’un retour (1963) 166 Figure 26. Still from 2 ou 3 choses que je sais d’elle (1967) 196 Figure 27. Still from Peuple en marche (1963) 210 Figure 28. Still from J’ai huit ans (1963) 210 vii Introduction Modernity is, in fact, a European phenomenon but one constituted in a dialectical relation with a non-European alterity. – Enrique Dussel1 Framing Perspectives I was drawn into the question of how France’s colonial war with Algeria shaped the politics of French film and film culture by a feeling I had, and continue to have, concerning Michael Haneke’s Caché. Haneke’s film has emerged as one of the most generative texts of the early twenty-first century, largely because it seems so radically singular and hard to pin down aesthetically, politically, and historically. This dissertation is premised on the idea that Caché establishes a dynamic on these three fronts that is actually very familiar in the history of European art and militant cinema when it comes to the topic of Algeria. Since its release in 2005, Haneke’s detective picture has triggered an astonishing volume of critical scholarship, and even inspired a full dossier of debate in Screen, film studies’ leading international journal. The disposition of these debates, moreover, has been strongly polarized. For some cultural historians and theorists, such as Paul Gilroy and Nicolas Mirzoeff, Caché’s “whodunit” narrative structure and emphasis on French subjectivity combine to create a formally revisionist and embarrassingly Eurocentric picture of the colonial 1 Enrique Dussel, quoted in Walter D. Mignolo, “DELINKING: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality,” Cultural Studies 21, nos. 2-3 (2007): 453. 1 past.2 For others, including Martine Beugnet and Guy Austin, Haneke’s investigative framework and (modernist) strategies of indirection work to illuminate the traces of a war whose history has been deferred by France’s ongoing legacy of state sanctioned amnesia.3 Considered collectively, this accumulating body of scholarship reveals that Haneke’s multi-layered aesthetic perspective on the years of decolonization has agitated a cultural nerve, perhaps because this perspective’s political underpinnings remain largely mystifying and un-intelligible.
Recommended publications
  • Last Year at Marienbad Redux
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Last Year at Marienbad redux Allan Sekula and Noël Burch. Still from Reagan Tape, 1981, single-channel video, color, sound, 10 min. 39 sec., edition of 5 © Allan Sekula and Noël Burch, Courtesy of the artists and Christopher Grimes Gallery, Santa Monica September 12 – October 26, 2013 Opening Reception: Thursday, September 12, 6-8 pm EFA Project Space Curated by James Voorhies th nd produced by Bureau for Open Culture 323 West 39 Street, 2 floor New York, NY 10018 between 8th and 9th Avenues Participating Artists and Writers: Jennifer Allen, Keren Cytter, Tacita Dean, Jessamyn Fiore, Dan Fox, Gallery Hours: Wed through Sat, 12-6 pm Jens Hoffmann, Iman Issa, David Maljković, Ján T. 212-563-5855 x 244 Mančuška, Gordon Matta-Clark, Josh Tonsfeldt, Allan [email protected] Sekula & Noël Burch, and Maya Schweizer www.efanyc.org /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Last Year at Marienbad redux is an exhibition, public program and publication that together examine how fictional narratives develop over time to form accepted knowledge of people, places, events and things. Inspired by the unconventional cinematic techniques such as nonlinear narrative and repetitive language used in the 1961 film Last Year at Marienbad (directed by Alain Resnais, with screenplay by Alain Robbe-Grillet), the exhibition Last Year at Marienbad redux features works of art that deploy these and other devices⎯⎯editing, character development, plot, mise-en-scène and montage⎯⎯to disrupt, challenge and conflate what is understood as fact and fiction. The project explores how memory, meaning and, ultimately, an understanding of reality are shaped. Last Year at Marienbad redux will bring together work by nine international contemporary artists whose practices engage with the technical and conceptual qualities of cinema.
    [Show full text]
  • Eric Rohmer's Film Theory (1948-1953)
    MARCO GROSOLI FILM THEORY FILM THEORY ERIC ROHMER’S FILM THEORY (1948-1953) IN MEDIA HISTORY IN MEDIA HISTORY FROM ‘ÉCOLE SCHERER’ TO ‘POLITIQUE DES AUTEURS’ MARCO GROSOLI ERIC ROHMER’S FILM THEORY ROHMER’S ERIC In the 1950s, a group of critics writing MARCO GROSOLI is currently Assistant for Cahiers du Cinéma launched one of Professor in Film Studies at Habib Univer- the most successful and influential sity (Karachi, Pakistan). He has authored trends in the history of film criticism: (along with several book chapters and auteur theory. Though these days it is journal articles) the first Italian-language usually viewed as limited and a bit old- monograph on Béla Tarr (Armonie contro fashioned, a closer inspection of the il giorno, Bébert 2014). hundreds of little-read articles by these critics reveals that the movement rest- ed upon a much more layered and in- triguing aesthetics of cinema. This book is a first step toward a serious reassess- ment of the mostly unspoken theoreti- cal and aesthetic premises underlying auteur theory, built around a recon- (1948-1953) struction of Eric Rohmer’s early but de- cisive leadership of the group, whereby he laid down the foundations for the eventual emergence of their full-fledged auteurism. ISBN 978-94-629-8580-3 AUP.nl 9 789462 985803 AUP_FtMh_GROSOLI_(rohmer'sfilmtheory)_rug16.2mm_v02.indd 1 07-03-18 13:38 Eric Rohmer’s Film Theory (1948-1953) Film Theory in Media History Film Theory in Media History explores the epistemological and theoretical foundations of the study of film through texts by classical authors as well as anthologies and monographs on key issues and developments in film theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Representing History and the Filmmaker in the Frame
    REPRESENTING HISTORY AND THE FILMMAKER IN THE FRAME Trent Griffiths* Resumo: A presença do realizador no enquadramento representa uma relação única entre o documentário e a História em que o realizador se envolve na história social através da sua experiência pessoal e enquanto autor de uma representação. O realizador no enquadramento é, também, um representante do momento histórico, ao explorar de modo reflexivo o encontro com o processo de mediação e auto-representação que caracteriza a sociedade pós-moderna. Palavras-chave: subjetividade, auto-reflexividade, realizador no enquadramento. Resumen: La presencia del director en el encuadre representa una relación úni- ca entre el documental y la historia, en la cual el director se involucra en la historia social a través de su experiencia personal como autor de una representación. El director en el encuadre es también un representante del momento histórico, al explorar de modo reflexivo el encuentro con el proceso de mediación y auto-representación que caracteriza a la sociedad posmoderna. Palabras clave: subjetividad, auto-reflexividad, director en el encuadre. Abstract: The presence of the filmmaker as a subject in the documentary frame represents a unique relationship between documentary film and history, where the filmmaker engages with social history through their personal experience of authoring a representation of it. This paper explores how the tension between the filmmaker’s presence as an author and as a subject enacts a kind of self-reflexivity that recasts the possibilities of representing history through documentary film. Keywords: Subjectivity, self-reflexivity, filmmaker in the frame. Résumé: La présence du réalisateur dans l’image cinématographique témoigne d’une relation unique entre documentaire et histoire : le réalisateur s’engage dans l’his- toire sociale à travers d’une expérience personnelle et comme auteur d’une représen- tation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inventory of the Richard Roud Collection #1117
    The Inventory of the Richard Roud Collection #1117 Howard Gotlieb Archival Research Center ROOD, RICHARD #1117 September 1989 - June 1997 Biography: Richard Roud ( 1929-1989), as director of both the New York and London Film Festivals, was responsible for both discovering and introducing to a wider audience many of the important directors of the latter half th of the 20 - century (many of whom he knew personally) including Bernardo Bertolucci, Robert Bresson, Luis Buiiuel, R.W. Fassbinder, Jean-Luc Godard, Werner Herzog, Terry Malick, Ermanno Ohni, Jacques Rivette and Martin Scorsese. He was an author of books on Jean-Marie Straub, Jean-Luc Godard, Max Ophuls, and Henri Langlois, as well as the editor of CINEMA: A CRITICAL DICTIONARY. In addition, Mr. Roud wrote extensive criticism on film, the theater and other visual arts for The Manchester Guardian and Sight and Sound and was an occasional contributor to many other publications. At his death he was working on an authorized biography of Fran9ois Truffaut and a book on New Wave film. Richard Roud was a Fulbright recipient and a Chevalier in the Legion of Honor. Scope and contents: The Roud Collection (9 Paige boxes, 2 Manuscript boxes and 3 Packages) consists primarily of book research, articles by RR and printed matter related to the New York Film Festival and prominent directors. Material on Jean-Luc Godard, Francois Truffaut and Henri Langlois is particularly extensive. Though considerably smaller, the Correspondence file contains personal letters from many important directors (see List ofNotable Correspondents). The Photographs file contains an eclectic group of movie stills.
    [Show full text]
  • The Altering Eye Contemporary International Cinema to Access Digital Resources Including: Blog Posts Videos Online Appendices
    Robert Phillip Kolker The Altering Eye Contemporary International Cinema To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/8 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. Robert Kolker is Emeritus Professor of English at the University of Maryland and Lecturer in Media Studies at the University of Virginia. His works include A Cinema of Loneliness: Penn, Stone, Kubrick, Scorsese, Spielberg Altman; Bernardo Bertolucci; Wim Wenders (with Peter Beicken); Film, Form and Culture; Media Studies: An Introduction; editor of Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho: A Casebook; Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey: New Essays and The Oxford Handbook of Film and Media Studies. http://www.virginia.edu/mediastudies/people/adjunct.html Robert Phillip Kolker THE ALTERING EYE Contemporary International Cinema Revised edition with a new preface and an updated bibliography Cambridge 2009 Published by 40 Devonshire Road, Cambridge, CB1 2BL, United Kingdom http://www.openbookpublishers.com First edition published in 1983 by Oxford University Press. © 2009 Robert Phillip Kolker Some rights are reserved. This book is made available under the Cre- ative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 2.0 UK: England & Wales Licence. This licence allows for copying any part of the work for personal and non-commercial use, providing author
    [Show full text]
  • Film Film Film Film
    City of Darkness, City of Light is the first ever book-length study of the cinematic represen- tation of Paris in the films of the émigré film- PHILLIPS CITY OF LIGHT ALASTAIR CITY OF DARKNESS, makers, who found the capital a first refuge from FILM FILMFILM Hitler. In coming to Paris – a privileged site in terms of production, exhibition and the cine- CULTURE CULTURE matic imaginary of French film culture – these IN TRANSITION IN TRANSITION experienced film professionals also encounter- ed a darker side: hostility towards Germans, anti-Semitism and boycotts from French indus- try personnel, afraid of losing their jobs to for- eigners. The book juxtaposes the cinematic por- trayal of Paris in the films of Robert Siodmak, Billy Wilder, Fritz Lang, Anatole Litvak and others with wider social and cultural debates about the city in cinema. Alastair Phillips lectures in Film Stud- ies in the Department of Film, Theatre & Television at the University of Reading, UK. CITY OF Darkness CITY OF ISBN 90-5356-634-1 Light ÉMIGRÉ FILMMAKERS IN PARIS 1929-1939 9 789053 566343 ALASTAIR PHILLIPS Amsterdam University Press Amsterdam University Press WWW.AUP.NL City of Darkness, City of Light City of Darkness, City of Light Émigré Filmmakers in Paris 1929-1939 Alastair Phillips Amsterdam University Press For my mother and father, and in memory of my auntie and uncle Cover design: Kok Korpershoek, Amsterdam Lay-out: japes, Amsterdam isbn 90 5356 633 3 (hardback) isbn 90 5356 634 1 (paperback) nur 674 © Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 2004 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, me- chanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permis- sion of both the copyright owner and the author of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Vivre Sa Vie Nathaniel Dorsky Kinorama Antichrist O Plano Frontal
    TODA A POESIA QUE VINICIUS VIU NO CINEMA, POR CARLOS A. CALIL O BOLETIM DO ANO 35 N162 CINE CLUBE DE VISEU JUNHO 2019 2 EUROS QUADRIMESTRAL O INCONTORNÁVEL GODARD NA RETINA DE Vivre sa vie MARIA JOÃO MADEIRA ANA BARROSO NOS PASSOS DO CINEMA LUMINOSO DE Nathaniel Dorsky O NOVO PROJECTO DE EDGAR PÊRA É O MOTE PARA Kinorama UMA CONVERSA COM EDUARDO EGO DE LARS VON TRIER COMEMORA UMA DÉCADA E FILIPE VARELA Antichrist ESCREVE-NOS SOBRE ELE EM ‘NÓS POR CÁ’, FAUSTO CRUCHINHO REFLECTE SOBRE O plano frontal DISCURSO VISUAL E DISTORÇÃO DA REALIDADE em televisão POR MANUEL PEREIRA A retórica do poder JARMUSCH INSPIRA ANDRÉ RUIVO NO Dead Man SEU ‘OBSERVATÓRIO’ 162 VIVRE SA VIE NA RETINA DE MARIA JOÃO MADEIRA GRIFFITH DIZIA QUE ERA TUDO O QUE ERA PRECISO, GODARD CITA-O POR ESCRITO: A FILM IS A GIRL AND A GUN. Na capa, Charlotte Gainsbourg, num fotograma de Antichrist (Lars von Trier, 2009). Por causa de uma crónica, uma ilustração, um ensaio, mais cedo ou mais tarde o Argumento vai fazer falta. Assinaturas €10 5 EDIÇÕES HTTP://WWW.CINECLUBEVISEU.PT/ARGUMENTO-ASSINATURAS Colaboram neste número: MARIA JOÃO EDGAR ANA FILIPE FAUSTO MANUEL ANDRÉ MADEIRA PÊRA BARROSO VA R E L A CRUCHINHO PEREIRA RUIVO PROGRAMADORA DE ESTÁ A TERMINAR ANA BARROSO É ESTUDOU CINEMA, PROFESSOR AUXILIAR FORMADO EM ESTUDOS LICENCIADO EM DESIGN CINEMA, SOBRETUDO. KINORAMA — CINE- INVESTIGADORA NO FILOSOFIA E MATEMÁ- DA FACULDADE DE ARTÍSTICOS NA VA- DE COMUNICAÇÃO PELA MA FORA DE ÓRBI- CENTRO DE ESTUDOS TICA. REALIZOU DUAS LETRAS DA UNIVER- RIANTE DE ESTUDOS FBAUL E MESTRE EM TA, A SEQUELA DO ANGLÍSTICOS DA U.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Équinoxe Screenwriters' Workshop / Palais Schwarzenberg, Vienna 31
    25. éQuinoxe Screenwriters’ Workshop / 31. October – 06. November 2005 Palais Schwarzenberg, Vienna ADVISORS THE SELECTED WRITERS THE SELECTED SCRIPTS DIE AUSGEWÄHLTEN DIE AUSGEWÄHLTEN AUTOREN DREHBÜCHER Dev BENEGAL (India) Lois AINSLIE (Great Britain) A Far Better Thing Yves DESCHAMPS (France) Andrea Maria DUSL (Austria) Channel 8 Florian FLICKER (Austria) Peter HOWEY (Great Britain) Czech Made James V. HART (USA) Oliver KEIDEL (Germany) Dr. Alemán Hannah HOLLINGER (Germany) Paul KIEFFER (Luxembourg) Arabian Nights David KEATING (Ireland) Jean-Louis LAVAL (France) Reclaimed Justice Danny KRAUSZ (Austria) Piotrek MULARUK (Poland) Yuma Susan B. LANDAU (USA) Gabriele NEUDECKER (Austria) ...Then I Started Killing God Marcia NASATIR (USA) Dominique STANDAERT (Belgium) Wonderful Eric PLESKOW (Austria / USA) Hans WEINGARTNER (Austria) Code 82 Lorenzo SEMPLE (USA) Martin SHERMAN (Great Britain) 2 25. éQuinoxe Screenwriters‘ Workshop / 31. October - 06. November 2005 Palais Schwarzenberg, Vienna: TABLE OF CONTENTS / INHALT Foreword 4 The Selected Writers 30 - 31 Lois AINSLIE (Great Britain) – A FAR BETTER THING 32 The Story of éQuinoxe / To Be Continued 5 Andrea Maria DUSL (Austria) – CHANNEL 8 33 Peter HOWEY (Great Britain) – CZECH MADE 34 Interview with Noëlle Deschamps 8 Oliver KEIDEL (Germany) – DR. ALEMÁN 35 Paul KIEFFER (Luxembourg) – ARABIAN NIGHTS 36 From Script to Screen: 1993 – 2005 12 Jean Louis LAVAL (France) – RECLAIMED JUSTICE 37 Piotrek MULARUK (Poland) – YUMA 38 25. éQuinoxe Screenwriters‘ Workshop Gabriele NEUDECKER (Austria) – ... TEHN I STARTED KILLING GOD 39 The Advisors 16 Dominique STANDAERT (Belgium) – WONDERFUL 40 Dev BENEGAL (India) 17 Hans WEINGARTNER (Austria) – CODE 82 41 Yves DESCHAMPS (France) 18 Florian FLICKER (Austria) 19 Special Sessions / Media Lawyer Dr. Stefan Rüll 42 Jim HART (USA) 20 Master Classes / Documentary Filmmakers 44 Hannah HOLLINGER (Germany) 21 David KEATING (Ireland) 22 The Global éQuinoxe Network: The Correspondents 46 Danny KRAUSZ (Austria) 23 Susan B.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Cinema
    GLOBAL CINEMA Edited by Katarzyna Marciniak, Anikó Imre, and Áine O’Healy The Global Cinema series publishes innovative scholarship on the transnational themes, industries, economies, and aesthetic elements that increasingly connect cinemas around the world. It promotes theoretically transformative and politi- cally challenging projects that rethink film studies from cross-cultural, comparative perspectives, bringing into focus forms of cinematic production that resist nation- alist or hegemonic frameworks. Rather than aiming at comprehensive geographical coverage, it foregrounds transnational interconnections in the production, dis- tribution, exhibition, study, and teaching of film. Dedicated to global aspects of cinema, this pioneering series combines original perspectives and new method- ological paths with accessibility and coverage. Both “global” and “cinema” remain open to a range of approaches and interpretations, new and traditional. Books pub- lished in the series sustain a specific concern with the medium of cinema but do not defensively protect the boundaries of film studies, recognizing that film exists in a converging media environment. The series emphasizes a historically expanded rather than an exclusively presentist notion of globalization; it is mindful of reposi- tioning “the global” away from a US-centric/Eurocentric grid, and remains critical of celebratory notions of “globalizing film studies.” Katarzyna Marciniak is a professor of Transnational Studies in the English Depart- ment at Ohio University. Anikó Imre is an associate
    [Show full text]
  • Simone De Beauvoir and the Politics of Privilege
    Simone de Beauvoir and the Politics of Privilege SONIA KRUKS How should socially privileged white feminists (and others) address their privilege? Often, individuals are urged to overcome their own personal racism through a politics of self-transformation. The paper argues that this strategy may be problematic, since it rests on an over-autonomous conception of the self. The paper turns to Simone de Beauvoir for an alternative account of the selh as “situated,” and explores what this means for a politics ofprivilege. In 1955, Simone de Beauvoir published a collection of essays entitled Privil&es. She wrote in the Preface that one question linked all her essays together: how may the privileged think about their situation? They cannot think about it honestly and without self-delusion, she says. For, “to justify the possession of particular advantages in the mode of the universal is not an easy undertaking,” and it results in a mode of thought marked by the kinds of obfuscation and self- deception that Beauvoir (along with Jean-Paul Sartre) calls “bad faith” (1955, 7). Beauvoir’s main concern in her book was with how ruling-class privilege is masked, or rationalized, in thought. However, her critique also resonates strongly with recent feminist critiques of the self-deceptions inherent in mas- culine, white-race, and other forms of privilege, as well as with the dilemmas of privileged would-be progressives’ more generally. In this paper I turn to Simone de Beauvoir to help think about ‘privilege’ as it is conceived in feminist theory and politics today, and particularly as it poses a predicament for those who enjoy significant social privilege while also being committed to fighting it.
    [Show full text]
  • Distributeurs Indépendants Réunis Européens
    MEMBRES DU BLOC – BUREAU DE LIAISON DES ORGANISATIONS DU CINEMA 2008 : UNE SITUATION PREOCCUPANTE POUR LA DISTRIBUTION INDEPENDANTE ETAT DES LIEUX Prenant acte qu’ils font face aux mêmes difficultés liées à l’évolution des conditions de diffusion des films, et qu’ils tendent vers les mêmes objectifs, Le SDI (Syndicat des Distributeurs Indépendants) et DIRE (Distributeurs Indépendants Réunis Européens) ont décidé de mettre en commun leurs réflexions et de proposer aux Pouvoirs Publics les réformes qui permettront aux distributeurs indépendants de continuer à défendre une certaine idée du cinéma : celle de la diversité de l’offre de films et de l’accès des spectateurs au plus grand nombre de cinématographies du monde. Rappel : Le poids des distributeurs indépendants Dans le secteur cinématographique, la fonction de « recherche et développement » n’est pas intégrée aux groupes qui dominent le marché . Les risques inhérents à cette démarche sont exclusivement assumés par les distributeurs indépendants , sans que les coûts puissent en être amortis sur les recettes des films à réel potentiel commercial, dont bon nombre ne pourraient pourtant pas exister sans ce travail de découverte. Sans les distributeurs indépendants, les grands auteurs français et internationaux dont les noms suivent (liste de surcroît très partielle), qui symbolisent la richesse du cinéma, n’auraient pas été découverts : Pedro ALMODOVAR, Théo ANGELOPOULOS, Denis ARCAND, Rachid BOUCHAREB, Kenneth BRANAGH, Catherine BREILLAT, Laurent CANTET, Nuri Bilge CEYLAN, Claude CHABROL,
    [Show full text]
  • CIN-1103 : Nouvelle Vague Et Nouveaux Cinémas Contenu Et
    Département de littérature, théâtre et cinéma Professeur : Jean-Pierre Sirois-Trahan Faculté des lettres et des sciences humaines Session : Hiver 2020 CIN-1103 : Nouvelle Vague et nouveaux cinémas Local du cours : CSL-1630 Horaire : Mercredi, 15h30-18h20 Projection : Mercredi, 18h30-21h20 (CSL-1630) Téléphone : 418-656-2131, p. 407074 Bureau : CSL-3447 Courriel : [email protected] Site personnel : https://ulaval.academia.edu/JeanPierreSiroisTrahan Contenu et objectifs du cours Dans l’histoire du cinéma mondial, la Nouvelle Vague (française) peut être considérée comme l’un des événements majeurs, de telle façon que l’on a pu dire qu’il y avait un avant et un après. Deuxième moment de la modernité au cinéma après le néoréalisme italien, son avènement au tournant des années soixante a profondément changé la donne esthétique de l’art cinématographique, et ce jusqu’à aujourd’hui. L’une des caractéristiques les plus essentielles de ce mouvement fut de considérer le cinéma, dans l’exercice même de sa praxis, de façon critique, cinéphile et réflexive. Groupée autour de la revue des Cahiers du Cinéma, cofondée par André Bazin, la Nouvelle Vague est souvent réduite à un groupe de critiques passés à la réalisation : Claude Chabrol, François Truffaut, Jean-Luc Godard, Jacques Rivette, Éric Rohmer, Pierre Kast, Jacques Doniol-Valcroze et Marilù Parolini (scénariste). Aussi, il ne faudrait pas oublier ceux que l’on nomma le « groupe Rive gauche » : Agnès Varda, Alain Resnais, Chris Marker, Jacques Demy, Jean-Daniel Pollet, Henri Colpi et Jacques Rozier. On peut aussi y rattacher un certain nombre d’outsiders importants, soit immédiatement précurseurs (Jean- Pierre Melville, Georges Franju, Jean Rouch et Alexandre Astruc), soit continuateurs à l’esthétique plus ou moins proche (Marguerite Duras, Jean-Marie Straub et Danièle Huillet, Paula Delsol, Maurice Pialat, Jean Eustache, Chantal Akerman, Philippe Garrel, Jacques Doillon, Catherine Breillat, Danièle Dubroux et André Téchiné).
    [Show full text]