DOCSLIB.ORG

Lolo Regional Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

$21.50 LOLO REGIONAL PLAN Adopted April 24, 2002 By the Board of County Commissioners RESOLUTION NUMBER 2002-064 A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE LOLO REGIONAL PLAN FINAL DRAFT. WHEREAS, 76-1-604 M.C.A. authorizes the Board of County Commissioners to adopt and amend comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners did adopt a comprehensive plan for the County in 1975; and, WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners updated and amended this comprehensive plan in 1990, and 1998, and has emended parts of it by adopting subarea and neighborhood plans; and, WHEREAS, the Lolo Regional Plan represents an update of the 1998 Urban Area Comprehensive Plan Update; and, WHEREAS, the Lolo Regional Plan represents an update of the 1978 Lolo Land Use Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Lolo Regional Plan was drafted through a public planning process by the Missoula Office of Planning and Grants; and, WHEREAS, the Lolo Regional Plan was reviewed by the Missoula Consolidated Planning Board at five public meetings, beginning 11/27/01 and ending 2/12/02; and WHEREAS, the Missoula Consolidated Planning Board has recommended adoption of the Lolo Regional Plan as amended; and WHEREAS, revisions have been incorporated into the final draft form of the Plan, along with a few additional corrections and clarifications; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Missoula County hereby adopts this resolution to adopt the Lolo Regional Plan Final Draft, as amended by Planning Board and, as amended by the Board of County Commissioners. A copy of the plan document is available at the Missoula Office of Planning and Grants. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that: This Lolo Regional Plan is an amendment to the Missoula County Plan and the Missoula Urban Comprehensive Plan. It supercedes the 1978 Lolo Land Use Plan. It is a policy document intended to provide the County and other agencies and districts with a coordinated guide for change over a long period of time. When making decisions based on the Plan, not all of the goals and implementation proposals can be met to the same degree in every instance. Use of the Plan requires a balancing of its various components on a case-by-case basis, as well as a selection of those goals and implementation proposals most pertinent to the issue at hand. The common theme of all the goals and implementation proposals is acceptance of them as suitable approaches toward problem-solving and goal realization. Other valid approaches may exist. Adoption of the Plan does not necessarily commit the County to immediately carry out each policy to the letter, but does put the County on record as having recognized the desirability of the goals and implementation proposals and the decisions or actions they imply. The County can then begin to carry out the goals and implementation proposals to the best of its ability, given sufficient time and resources. Resolution of Intent passed and adopted April 24, 2002. Acknowledgements This planning document owes its final form and content to the following: The Citizens of the Lolo region including The Community of Lolo, Lolo Creek Valley, and North Bitterroot Valley (who provided information, opinions, historical facts and testimony.) The Lolo Community Council (who provided countless hours of time on behalf of the area as well as coordination between the Planning Office and the citizens of the area.) Lolo School Students, Montana - Idaho Chapters of the American Society of Landscape Architects, and National Park Service (for funding, coordinating, and participating in the many planning workshops including the Travelers’ Rest Design Charrette (100 Years, 100 Parks – ASLA Centennial Program).) Members of the Missoula Consolidated Planning Board (at time of review) Troy Kurth, Chair Tom Maclay Mike Kopitzke Chuck Gibson Don MacArthur Helen Cipolato, Alternate Deb Halliday Tim Ibey, Alternate Russ Fletcher Len Broberg (term ended 12/31/01) Bruce Haroldson John Spangler (term ended 12/31/01) Fred Reed Dale A. Clouse (term ended 12/31/01) Board of County Commissioners Jean Curtis, Chair Barbara Evans Bill Carey Missoula Office of Planning and Grants Laval Means, Nancy Heil, Tim Hall, Brian Maiorano, Dave Dewing, Erik Benson, David Gray, Krisin VanValkenburg (intern), Bobbi Day, Jeff Schalow, Philip Maechling, and Director Cindy Klette. In addition, all of the staff who reviewed preliminary drafts, participated in neighborhood meetings, and provided moral support. Missoula County Deputy County Attorney, Colleen Dowdall Chief Administrative Officer, Ann Mary Dussault All County, State, and Federal agencies as well as private organizations who assisted in the development of this document. LOLO REGIONAL PLAN Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ............................................................................................................................ i Chapter One: Introduction ........................................................................................... 1-1 Chapter Two: Overview ............................................................................................... 2-1 Chapter Three: Historic and Cultural Resources ....................................................... 3-1 Chapter Four: Natural Resources ............................................................................... 4A-1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 4A-1 A. Geology ...................................................................................................................................... 4A-1 B. Water ........................................................................................................................................... 4B-1 C. Biology ....................................................................................................................................... 4C-1 D. Air ............................................................................................................................................... 4D-1 Chapter Five: Development Resources ...................................................................... 5A-1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 5A-1 A. Population and Projected Growth ............................................................................................... 5A-1 B. Development Patterns ................................................................................................................. 5B-1 C. Housing ....................................................................................................................................... 5C-1 D. Economy ..................................................................................................................................... 5D-1 E. Transportation ............................................................................................................................. 5E-1 F. Parks, Recreational Lands, and Open Space .............................................................................. 5F-1 G. Community Facilities and Services ............................................................................................ 5G-1 Chapter Six: Community Character ............................................................................. 6A-1 A. Community of Lolo Development Area ..................................................................................... 6A-1 B. North Bitterroot Valley Development Area ................................................................................ 6B-1 C. Lolo Creek Valley Development Area ........................................................................................ 6C-1 Chapter Seven: Land Use Types and Guidelines ....................................................... 7-1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 7-1 A. Resource Based Land Uses ......................................................................................................... 7A-1 B. Residential Areas ........................................................................................................................ 7B-1 C. Commercial Areas ...................................................................................................................... 7C-1 D. Public and Quasi-Public Areas ................................................................................................... 7D-1 E. Parks and Open Space ................................................................................................................. 7D-1 F. Land Use Rationale ..................................................................................................................... 7F-1 Adopted April 24, 2002 LOLO REGIONAL PLAN Table of Contents Chapter Eight: Plan Implementation ............................................................................ 8-1 Table 8-1: Plan Implementation ....................................................................................................... 8-8 Appendices 1A List of Additional Resources 5D Population Levels and Urban Activities 4A Hillside Design Guidelines 5E Lolo Area Highway Traffic Counts • Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Guidelines 6A Community Design Guidelines 4B Living with Wildlife Recommendations
Recommended publications
  • Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana

    Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana

    Report of Investigation 23 Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana Richard B. Berg 2015 Cover photo by Richard Berg. Sapphires (very pale green and colorless) concentrated by panning. The small red grains are garnets, commonly found with sapphires in western Montana, and the black sand is mainly magnetite. Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences, RI 23 Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences in Montana Richard B. Berg Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology MBMG Report of Investigation 23 2015 i Compilation of Reported Sapphire Occurrences, RI 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 Descriptions of Occurrences ..................................................................................................7 Selected Bibliography of Articles on Montana Sapphires ................................................... 75 General Montana ............................................................................................................75 Yogo ................................................................................................................................ 75 Southwestern Montana Alluvial Deposits........................................................................ 76 Specifi cally Rock Creek sapphire district ........................................................................ 76 Specifi cally Dry Cottonwood Creek deposit and the Butte area ....................................
  • A Look at the 1988 Missoula County Lolo Peak Ballot Issue

    A Look at the 1988 Missoula County Lolo Peak Ballot Issue

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1990 Political community and nature| A look at the 1988 Missoula County Lolo Peak ballot issue Michael Maurice Welsh The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Welsh, Michael Maurice, "Political community and nature| A look at the 1988 Missoula County Lolo Peak ballot issue" (1990). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 3246. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/3246 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY Copying allowed as provided under provisions of the Fair Use Section of the U.S. COPYRIGHT LAW, 1976. Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's written consent. UniversityMontana of The Political Community and Nature A Look at the 1988 Missoula County Lolo Peak Ballot Issue By Michael Maurice Welsh B.S. University of Iowa, 1984 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science University of Montana 1990 Approved by / ( i (H ( ( / •<- ' "j ' c L (?L L i . , Chair, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate School • ' I J / . / , L Date UMI Number: EP35345 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
  • West Fork Rock Creek Watershed Assessment

    West Fork Rock Creek Watershed Assessment

    WEST FORK ROCK CREEK WATERSHED ASSESSMENT United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Beaverhead- WEST FORK Deerlodge National Forest ROCK CREEK Pintlar Ranger District WATERSHED ASSESSMENT January 31 , 2007 1 WEST FORK ROCK CREEK WATERSHED ASSESSMENT The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal employment opportunity provider and employer. Cover Photo: Bowles Creek, Cameron Rasor, June 20, 2005 2 WEST FORK ROCK CREEK WATERSHED ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS West Fork Rock Creek Watershed FACT SHEET …………………………………………1 Executive Summary..................................................................................................... 3 Section 1 Goals and Methods .............................................................................
  • Milltown, Montana and the History of Superfund Implementation

    Milltown, Montana and the History of Superfund Implementation

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2012 Restoring the "Shining Waters": Milltown, Montana and the History of Superfund Implementation David James Brooks The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Brooks, David James, "Restoring the "Shining Waters": Milltown, Montana and the History of Superfund Implementation" (2012). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 836. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/836 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RESTORING THE “SHINING WATERS:” MILLTOWN, MONTANA AND THE HISTORY OF SUPERFUND IMPLEMENTATION By David James Brooks MA Anthropology, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, 2004 BS Biology, Adams State College, Alamosa, Colorado, 1995 Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in History The University of Montana Missoula, MT May 2012 Approved by: Sandy Ross, Associate Dean of the Graduate School Graduate School Dan Flores, Chair Department of History Jeff Wiltse Department of History Jody Pavilack Department of History Tobin Shearer Department of History Nancy Cook Department of English Literature Sara Dant Department of History, Weber State University COPYRIGHT by David James Brooks 2012 All Rights Reserved ii Brooks, David, PhD, May 2012 History Abstract: Restoring the "Shining Waters:" Milltown, Montana and the History of Superfund Implementation Chairperson: Dan Flores This dissertation is a case study of a dam removal and river restoration within the nation’s largest Superfund site.
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form

    National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form

    !.PS Perm 10-900-b _____ QMB No. 1024-0018 (Jan. 1967) *-• United States Department of the Interior ».< National Park Service ^ MAR1 National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering trie requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing_____________________________________________ _______Historic Resources in Missoula, Montana, 1864-1940___________ 3. Associated Historic Contexts________________________________________________ _______Commercial Development in Missoula, Montana, 1864-1940____ ______Commercial Architecture in Missoula, Montana, 1864Q194Q C. Geographical Data The incorporated city limits of the City of LJSee continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation, standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation. 3 - IH-^O Signature of certifying official //Y Date j\A "T Swpo ^ ° State or Federal agency and bureau I, here by, certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evi iluating related pro Derties for listing in the National Register. i. < / \ ——L- A ^Signature of the Keeper of the National Register Date ' ' ( N —— ——————— E.
  • Resolution Number 7660 a Resolution of the Missoula

    Resolution Number 7660 a Resolution of the Missoula

    RESOLUTION NUMBER 7660 A RESOLUTION OF THE MISSOULA CITY COUNCIL TO ADOPT A PRE-DISASTER MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE WHICH WILL GUIDE THE CITY IN MAKING DECISIONS FOR PRE-DISASTER MITIGATION PROJECTS AND ALLOW THE CITY TO BE ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE FEDERAL PRE- AND POST-DISASTER MITIGATION FUNDS. WHEREAS, all citizens and property within the City of Missoula are at risk from a wide range of hazards, such as, but not limited to, flooding, earthquakes, winter storms, wind and thunderstorms, wildfire, landslides, and volcanic hazards, and; WHEREAS, the Missoula City Council recognizes that mitigation is the most cost effective way to manage the potential consequences of disasters, and; WHEREAS, a Pre-Disaster Mitigation Plan will guide the City in making decisions for pre-disaster mitigation projects, and; WHEREAS, the Federal Emergency Management Agency requires local jurisdictions to have an approved Pre-Disaster Mitigation Plan to be eligible for federal pre- or post-disaster mitigation monies, and; WHEREAS, the 2004 Pre-Disaster Mitigation Plan was prepared in accordance with guidance provided by FEMA under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000, and; WHEREAS, the 2004 Pre-Disaster Mitigation Plan provides the background and essentials for evaluating risks and exposures to hazards, and; WHEREAS, this 2011 Pre-Disaster Mitigation Plan Update has been prepared according to "Local Multi- Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance" (FEMA, 2008) and adds to the 2004 Pre-Disaster Mitigation Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Missoula, Montana hereby adopts, the Pre- Disaster Mitigation Plan Update dated August, 2011. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of October, 2011 ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/ Martha L.
  • An Assessment of Fish Populations and Riparian Habitat in Tributaries of the Upper Clark Fork River Basin: Phase II

    An Assessment of Fish Populations and Riparian Habitat in Tributaries of the Upper Clark Fork River Basin: Phase II

    An Assessment of Fish Populations and Riparian Habitat in Tributaries of the Upper Clark Fork River Basin: Phase II Prepared by: Brad Liermann, Jason Lindstrom, and Ryan Kreiner of Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks March 2009 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................8 METHODS ......................................................................................................................................9 Stream Selection ..................................................................................................................................................9 Sample Reach Selection.......................................................................................................................................9 Fish Sampling ....................................................................................................................................................10 Riparian Assessments ........................................................................................................................................11 Water Temperature ............................................................................................................................................11 Data Summary....................................................................................................................................................12 Rock Creek Drainage ..................................................................................................................13
  • History Winter Range and Current Status of the Rock Creek Montana Bighorn Sheep Herd

    History Winter Range and Current Status of the Rock Creek Montana Bighorn Sheep Herd

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1972 History winter range and current status of the Rock Creek Montana bighorn sheep herd Michael William Aderhold The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Aderhold, Michael William, "History winter range and current status of the Rock Creek Montana bighorn sheep herd" (1972). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 6498. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/6498 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE HISTORY, WINTER RANGE, AND CURRENT STATUS OF THE ROCK CREEK, MONTANA, BIGHORN SHEEP HERD By Michael W. Aderhold B.S., University of Michigan, 1963 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirments for the degree of Master of Science UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1972 Approved by: ^ \ Board of Ekamin^s n, Gr^duaW School^ - r —f Date Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMl Number; EP37299 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction Is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted.
  • Rock Creek Watershed Restoration Plan TROUT UNLIMITED

    Rock Creek Watershed Restoration Plan TROUT UNLIMITED

    ROCK CREEK WATERSHED RESTORATION PLAN TROUT UNLIMITED March 2018 Acknowledgements Rob Roberts and Christine Brissette of Trout Unlimited provided project management for the development of this report. TU would also like to thank Elizabeth Mohr, Tess Scanlon, and Max Lewis for their work and dedication to this project. In addition, the following entities contributed time and effort to this document and the restoration planning therein: • Beaverhead Deerlodge National Forest • Five Valleys Land Trust • Granite County • Granite Conservation District • Granite Headwaters Watershed Group • Lolo National Forest • Montana Department of Environmental Quality • Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks • Natural Resource Conservation Service • Powell County • Residents of Rock Creek, public meeting participants and survey participants • Soil and Water Conservation Districts of Montana • United States Bureau of Land Management • United States Environmental Protection Agency • United States Fish & Wildlife Service Table of Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................................. 2 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Plan Organization .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 A Historical Note...............................................................................................................................
  • Lolo National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication

    Lolo National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication

    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2018 to 06/30/2018 Lolo National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact R1 - Northern Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Bob Marshall Wilderness - Recreation management In Progress: Expected:04/2015 04/2015 Debbie Mucklow Outfitter and Guide Permit - Special use management Scoping Start 03/29/2014 406-758-6464 Reissuance [email protected] CE Description: Reissuance of existing outfitter and guide permits in the Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=44827 Location: UNIT - Swan Lake Ranger District, Hungry Horse Ranger District, Lincoln Ranger District, Rocky Mountain Ranger District, Seeley Lake Ranger District, Spotted Bear Ranger District. STATE - Montana. COUNTY - Flathead, Glacier, Lewis and Clark, Missoula, Pondera, Powell, Teton. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Bob Marshall Wilderness Complex. FNF Plan Revision & NCDE - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:05/2018 06/2018 Joseph Krueger GBCS Amendment to the Lolo, Objection Period Legal Notice 406-758-5243 Helena, Lewis & Clark,and 12/14/2017 [email protected] Kootenai NFs Description: The Flathead NF is revising their forest plan and preparing an amendment providing relevant direction from the EIS NCDE Grizzly Bear Conservation Strategy into the forest plans for the Lolo, Helena, Kootenai, and Lewis & Clark *UPDATED* National Forests. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/goto/flathead/fpr Location: UNIT - Kootenai National Forest All Units, Lewis And Clark National Forest All Units, Flathead National Forest All Units, Helena National Forest All Units, Lolo National Forest All Units.
  • Some Effects of Rural Subdivisions on Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Around Lolo Montana

    Some Effects of Rural Subdivisions on Wildlife and Wildlife Habitat Around Lolo Montana

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1975 Some effects of rural subdivisions on wildlife and wildlife habitat around Lolo Montana Brace Hayden The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Hayden, Brace, "Some effects of rural subdivisions on wildlife and wildlife habitat around Lolo Montana" (1975). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 4802. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/4802 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SOME EFFECTS OF RURAL SUBDIVISIONS ON WILDLIFE AND WILDLIFE HABITAT AROUND LOLO, MONTANA By Brace Hayden B.3., University of Montana, 1973 B.S., University of California at Davis, 1969 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1975 Approved by Chairman, Board of Examiners GrSfua^^chool /a , Date 7 UMI Number: EP40266 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
  • Forest Plan Adopts Non-Motorized Use for Their Portion of the Proposed Great Burn Wilderness

    Forest Plan Adopts Non-Motorized Use for Their Portion of the Proposed Great Burn Wilderness

    Lolo KaNlispaell tional Forest Figure 3 Geographic Areas Kootenai NF Lower Clark Lewis Flathead & Fork Polson Thompson NF Clark Falls NF 200 Flathead Reservation Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes Superior North Fork Idaho Panhandle Seeley Lake Blackfoot NF Helena Middle Ninemile/Petty NF Clark Creek Seeley Fork Greater Missoula 200 Missoula Vicinity Map CANADA USA Lolo Creek Clearwater NF Rock Creek MONTANA Beaverhead - Deerlodge Bitterroot NF NF IDAHO 4/2006 Proposed Lolo National Forest Land Management Plan 2006 Geographic Area Desired Conditions Component Introduction While the forest-wide desired conditions indicate Plan Components broad trends which we expect to see over the next 10 to 15 years, we recognize that individual places Desired Conditions across the Lolo National Forest have unique Objectives Suitability of Areas characteristics and conditions. These places, referred Special Areas to as “geographic areas,” define a landscape that Guidelines people associate with on the Forest. Identifying these areas gives us the opportunity to fine-tune our forest- wide management to better respond to more local conditions and situations. The Lolo National Forest has been divided into the following eight geographic areas (see vicinity map on previous page): • Greater Missoula • Lolo Creek • Lower Clark Fork • Middle Clark Fork • Ninemile/Petty Creek • North Fork Blackfoot • Rock Creek • Seeley Lake Geographic Areas Each geographic area description provides the following: Geographic area map shows management areas (defined in Chapter 2) and acres in each, locations of unique features, primary population centers, and major rivers and roads. Unique characteristics and general overview provides a brief characterization of the area such as landscape features, primary land uses and ownership patterns, resource and recreational uses, and an indication of social and economic factors.