DOCSLIB.ORG

Christoffel Symbols 1 the Metric and Coordinate Basis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Christoffel Symbols 1 the Metric and Coordinate Basis Christoffel Symbols PHYS 471: Introduction to Relativity and Cosmology 1 The Metric and Coordinate Basis Let's recap some properties of the metric, before deriving the Christoffel symbols. First, we know the metric is a tensor gµν, which can be written as a 4 × 4 diago- nal matrix. The line element ds2 is the length-squared of an infinitesimal vector in spacetime: 2 µ ν ds = gµνdx dx (1) The components of the metric will depend on the coordinate system, however. For flat spacetime in Cartesian coordinates, this is the familiar Minkowski metric 2 2 2 2 2 ds = dt − dx − dy − dz ; gµν = ηµν = diag(+1; −1; −1; −1) But if we were to change coordinates to, say, spherical ones, the line element would look different: ds2 = dt2 − dr2 − r2dθ2 − r2 sin2 θdφ2 These metric coefficients can be \encoded" in what's called a \basis vector"e ^µ (more technically a vierbein!). Formally, we define the metric as the product gµν =e ^µ · e^ν (2) Great, but what is this basis vector thing?? You've actually seen them before. When you first start talking about vectors, we define the unit vectorsx; ^ y;^ z^ that point in those orthogonal directions. A general vector is then written ~s = Axx^ + Ayy^ + Azz^ When we change coordinates to spherical ones, we want to re-express these coefficients as some other set ~s = Arr^ + Aθθ^ + Aφφ^ So, consider a vector that has infinitesimal length for all its components: Ax = dx; Ay = dy; Az = dz. Then, ds~ = dx x^ + dy y^ + dz z^ If we switch to spherical coordinates, the appropriate transformation (using the Ja- cobian) gives ds~ = dr r^ + rdθ θ^ + r sin θ^dφφ But what we really want to do is express any such vector in a way that \looks like" the Cartesian version: ~ ds = dx^1 + dx^2 + dx^3 In order to do so, we define the coordinate basis vector component e^i to be the thing that allows us to write ~ ds = dx^1 + dx^2 + dx^3 = dx1e^1 + dx2e^2 + dx3e^3 Note that the \basis" quality has been taken away from dxi, which is now only a number. So, for the Cartesian system, dx^1 = dx e^x, dx^2 = dy e^y, dx^3 = dz e^z, which tells us that the components of the coordinate basis vector aree ^x =e ^y =e ^z = 1. Using this formalism, the line element is 2 ~ ~ 2 2 2 2 2 2 ds = ds · ds = (^e1) dx1 + (^e2) dx2 + (^e3) dx3 2 Comparing the above to Equations ?? and ??, we see that g11 =e ^1 · e^1 = (^e1) , and so forth. If we did the same thing in spherical coordinates, we'd find ~ ^ ^ ds = dr^ + dθ + dφ = dr e^r + dθ e^θ + dφ e^φ =) e^r = 1 ; e^θ = r ; e^φ = r sin θ 2 2 2 2 2 2 =) grr = (^er) = 1 ; gθθ = (^eθ) = r ; gφφ = (^eφ) = r sin θ Note that we're used to seeing these as negative, which they still are in spacetime! The above discussion was only for spatial components. 2 Properties of the Christoffel Symbols The coordinate basis vectors have an obvious coordinate dependence in some systems, so we must account for this when we compute things like derivatives. The Christoffel symbols encapsulate this dependence when you take the derivative of a coordinate basis vector. We define this as λ 0 1 2 3 @µe^ν = Γ µνe^λ = Γ µνe^0 + Γ µνe^1 + Γ µνe^2 + Γ µνe^3 That is, the derivative of the basis vector is a linear combination of the four com- ponents of the basis vector! This accounts for any motion the basis vector might undergo as it moves around a non-trivial geometry. Since we know gµν =e ^µe^ν, it's straightforward to show that the derivative of the metric is λ λ @αgµν = (@αe^µ)^eν +e ^µ(@αe^ν) = Γ αµe^λe^ν + Γ ανe^λe^µ λ λ =) @αgµν = Γ αµgλν + Γ ανgλµ (3) From this, we can derive an expression for the Chirstoffel symbols in terms of first derivatives of the metric. When we cycle the order of the indices α; µ, ν, we get two more equations: λ λ =) @µgνα = Γ µνgλα + Γ µαgλν (4) λ λ =) @νgαµ = Γ ναgλµ + Γ νµgλα (5) As luck would have it (or for geometric reasons, if you prefer), the Christoffel symbols are symmetric in their lower indices, which reveals that many of these terms are λ λ the same. For example, Γ µνgλα in Equation ?? is the same as Γ νµgλα in Equation ??, λ λ because we can write Γ µν = Γ νµ. Re-writing the above equations to make this obvious, we get λ λ (3) becomes −! @νgαµ = Γ µνgλα + Γ ανgλµ (6) λ λ (1) becomes −! @αgµν = Γ αµgλν + Γ ανgλµ (7) λ λ (2) becomes −! @µgνα = Γ αµgλν + Γ µνgλα (8) Note each term in Equation ?? (formerly Eq 1) appears in Equation ?? and ??, re- spectively. So, we combine these three equations and solve for the Christoffel symbols: Equation 4 + Equation 6 − Equation 4 = @νgαµ + @µgνα − @αgµν λ λ = Γ µνgλα + Γ µνgλα λ = 2Γ µνgλα (9) Success! All we need to do is isolate the Γ, and we do so by multiplying both sides by the inverse metric gλα: λ 2Γ µνgλα = @νgαµ + @µgνα − @αgµν 1 Γα = gαλ (@ g + @ g − @ g ) (10) µν 2 ν µλ µ λν λ µν OK, so now that we have a way to calculate these coefficients, what good are they? As mentioned before, these tell us something about how basis vectors change their direction as a vector moves around some space(time) with curvature. They also tell us something about the nature of lines in the curved spacetime, specifically straight ones (which are kinda sorta important to General Relativity). 3 Uses of the Christoffel Symbols There are varied applications of the Christoffel symbols in General Relativity, and more broadly in differential geometry. We'll encounter a few key ones in our discus- sions, however, so let's review three fundamental ones right now. 3.1 The Covariant Derivative Christoffel symbols are defined in terms of the derivative of the coordinate basis vector components. Their first and most important application is in the computation µ of derivatives in non-flat spacetimes. If we take the derivative of a vector A = A e^µ, we get ν ν ν @µA = @µ(A e^ν) = (@µA )^eν + A (@µe^ν) The second term in the derivative is the Christoffel symbol, so ν ν ν α @µ(A e^ν) = @µA e^ν + A Γ µνe^α Since the ν index in the first term is paired, we can arbitrarily replace it with α to find α ν α α ν α @µA e^α + A Γ µνe^α = @µA + A Γ µν e^α The term in parenthesis shows how the derivative of the vector A also depends on the coordinate basis terms. We call this the covariant derivative of Aν: ν ν ν α =) DµA = @µA + Γ µαA Note the lower in the Christoffel symbol combine the derivative index with the vector index (hence, \mixing" the coordinates due to derivatives). In General Relativity, we also deal with objects with lower indices, though, so some extra care must be taken. It turns out that the derivative of a covariant vector Aµ looks almost the same, except the sign in front of the Christoffel symbol is negative: α =) DµAν = @µAν − Γ µνAα So the rule is: upstairs indices get a positive Christoffel symbol, downstairs indices get a negative one. You can remember this easily, since up is positive, down is negative. Based on these rules, we can take the covariant derivative of a mixed tensor of any type, as long as we have a Christoffel symbol for each index. For example, the µν µ covariant derivative of R , Rµν, and R ν are µν µν α βν α µβ Positive for upper indices =) DαR = @αR + Γ µβR + Γ βνR β β Negative for lower indices =) DαRµν = @αRµν − Γ αµRβν − Γ ανRµβ µ µ µ β β µ + and − for mixed indices =) DαR ν = @αR ν + Γ αβR ν − Γ ανR β 3.2 The Christoffel Symbols and the Metric Taking a derivative is \moving" something in a space, or spacetime. If I move in the @ x^ direction, I think \ @x "! This is great for flat spaces, but as the above discussion suggests, moving in curved spaces (or spacetimes) means we have to think covariant derivative. So { what happens if we take the covariant derivative of the metric itself? (Whoa!) The answer is: NOTHING! Since the metric defines the intrinsic geometry, it shouldn't change as we move from place to place. A curved spacetime has the same curvature properties everywhere. So, that means Dαgµν = 0 =) Metric is the same everywhere! Writing this out in terms of Christoffel symbols, we get β β @αgµν − Γ αµgβν − Γ ανgµβ = 0 because we need a negative sign when we take the covariant derivative of things with covariant indices. We can rewrite this as β β @αgµν = Γ αµgβν + Γ ανgµβ A If we cycle through the indices as we did before (i.e. cyclically swap α; µ, and ν) we get β β @νgαµ = Γ ναgβµ + Γ νµgαβ B β β @µgνα = Γ µνgβα + Γ µαgνβ C I've called these A; B; C. As before, we note that because of the symmetry of the metric under exchanges of indices, terms with gαµ are the same as those with gµα, and so forth.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Mathematical Derivation of the General Relativistic Schwarzschild
    A Mathematical Derivation of the General Relativistic Schwarzschild Metric An Honors thesis presented to the faculty of the Departments of Physics and Mathematics East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors Scholar and Honors-in-Discipline Programs for a Bachelor of Science in Physics and Mathematics by David Simpson April 2007 Robert Gardner, Ph.D. Mark Giroux, Ph.D. Keywords: differential geometry, general relativity, Schwarzschild metric, black holes ABSTRACT The Mathematical Derivation of the General Relativistic Schwarzschild Metric by David Simpson We briefly discuss some underlying principles of special and general relativity with the focus on a more geometric interpretation. We outline Einstein’s Equations which describes the geometry of spacetime due to the influence of mass, and from there derive the Schwarzschild metric. The metric relies on the curvature of spacetime to provide a means of measuring invariant spacetime intervals around an isolated, static, and spherically symmetric mass M, which could represent a star or a black hole. In the derivation, we suggest a concise mathematical line of reasoning to evaluate the large number of cumbersome equations involved which was not found elsewhere in our survey of the literature. 2 CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................. 2 1 Introduction to Relativity ...................... 4 1.1 Minkowski Space ....................... 6 1.2 What is a black hole? ..................... 11 1.3 Geodesics and Christoffel Symbols ............. 14 2 Einstein’s Field Equations and Requirements for a Solution .17 2.1 Einstein’s Field Equations .................. 20 3 Derivation of the Schwarzschild Metric .............. 21 3.1 Evaluation of the Christoffel Symbols .......... 25 3.2 Ricci Tensor Components .................
    [Show full text]
  • Laplacians in Geometric Analysis
    LAPLACIANS IN GEOMETRIC ANALYSIS Syafiq Johar syafi[email protected] Contents 1 Trace Laplacian 1 1.1 Connections on Vector Bundles . .1 1.2 Local and Explicit Expressions . .2 1.3 Second Covariant Derivative . .3 1.4 Curvatures on Vector Bundles . .4 1.5 Trace Laplacian . .5 2 Harmonic Functions 6 2.1 Gradient and Divergence Operators . .7 2.2 Laplace-Beltrami Operator . .7 2.3 Harmonic Functions . .8 2.4 Harmonic Maps . .8 3 Hodge Laplacian 9 3.1 Exterior Derivatives . .9 3.2 Hodge Duals . 10 3.3 Hodge Laplacian . 12 4 Hodge Decomposition 13 4.1 De Rham Cohomology . 13 4.2 Hodge Decomposition Theorem . 14 5 Weitzenb¨ock and B¨ochner Formulas 15 5.1 Weitzenb¨ock Formula . 15 5.1.1 0-forms . 15 5.1.2 k-forms . 15 5.2 B¨ochner Formula . 17 1 Trace Laplacian In this section, we are going to present a notion of Laplacian that is regularly used in differential geometry, namely the trace Laplacian (also called the rough Laplacian or connection Laplacian). We recall the definition of connection on vector bundles which allows us to take the directional derivative of vector bundles. 1.1 Connections on Vector Bundles Definition 1.1 (Connection). Let M be a differentiable manifold and E a vector bundle over M. A connection or covariant derivative at a point p 2 M is a map D : Γ(E) ! Γ(T ∗M ⊗ E) 1 with the properties for any V; W 2 TpM; σ; τ 2 Γ(E) and f 2 C (M), we have that DV σ 2 Ep with the following properties: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Kähler Manifolds, Ricci Curvature, and Hyperkähler Metrics
    K¨ahlermanifolds, Ricci curvature, and hyperk¨ahler metrics Jeff A. Viaclovsky June 25-29, 2018 Contents 1 Lecture 1 3 1.1 The operators @ and @ ..........................4 1.2 Hermitian and K¨ahlermetrics . .5 2 Lecture 2 7 2.1 Complex tensor notation . .7 2.2 The musical isomorphisms . .8 2.3 Trace . 10 2.4 Determinant . 11 3 Lecture 3 11 3.1 Christoffel symbols of a K¨ahler metric . 11 3.2 Curvature of a Riemannian metric . 12 3.3 Curvature of a K¨ahlermetric . 14 3.4 The Ricci form . 15 4 Lecture 4 17 4.1 Line bundles and divisors . 17 4.2 Hermitian metrics on line bundles . 18 5 Lecture 5 21 5.1 Positivity of a line bundle . 21 5.2 The Laplacian on a K¨ahlermanifold . 22 5.3 Vanishing theorems . 25 6 Lecture 6 25 6.1 K¨ahlerclass and @@-Lemma . 25 6.2 Yau's Theorem . 27 6.3 The @ operator on holomorphic vector bundles . 29 1 7 Lecture 7 30 7.1 Holomorphic vector fields . 30 7.2 Serre duality . 32 8 Lecture 8 34 8.1 Kodaira vanishing theorem . 34 8.2 Complex projective space . 36 8.3 Line bundles on complex projective space . 37 8.4 Adjunction formula . 38 8.5 del Pezzo surfaces . 38 9 Lecture 9 40 9.1 Hirzebruch Signature Theorem . 40 9.2 Representations of U(2) . 42 9.3 Examples . 44 2 1 Lecture 1 We will assume a basic familiarity with complex manifolds, and only do a brief review today. Let M be a manifold of real dimension 2n, and an endomorphism J : TM ! TM satisfying J 2 = −Id.
    [Show full text]
  • HARMONIC MAPS Contents 1. Introduction 2 1.1. Notational
    HARMONIC MAPS ANDREW SANDERS Contents 1. Introduction 2 1.1. Notational conventions 2 2. Calculus on vector bundles 2 3. Basic properties of harmonic maps 7 3.1. First variation formula 7 References 10 1 2 ANDREW SANDERS 1. Introduction 1.1. Notational conventions. By a smooth manifold M we mean a second- countable Hausdorff topological space with a smooth maximal atlas. We denote the tangent bundle of M by TM and the cotangent bundle of M by T ∗M: 2. Calculus on vector bundles Given a pair of manifolds M; N and a smooth map f : M ! N; it is advantageous to consider the differential df : TM ! TN as a section df 2 Ω0(M; T ∗M ⊗ f ∗TN) ' Ω1(M; f ∗TN): There is a general for- malism for studying the calculus of differential forms with values in vector bundles equipped with a connection. This formalism allows a fairly efficient, and more coordinate-free, treatment of many calculations in the theory of harmonic maps. While this approach is somewhat abstract and obfuscates the analytic content of many expressions, it takes full advantage of the algebraic symmetries available and therefore simplifies many expressions. We will develop some of this theory now and use it freely throughout the text. The following exposition will closely fol- low [Xin96]. Let M be a smooth manifold and π : E ! M a real vector bundle on M or rank r: Throughout, we denote the space of smooth sections of E by Ω0(M; E): More generally, the space of differential p-forms with values in E is given by Ωp(M; E) := Ω0(M; ΛpT ∗M ⊗ E): Definition 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • General Relativity Fall 2019 Lecture 11: the Riemann Tensor
    General Relativity Fall 2019 Lecture 11: The Riemann tensor Yacine Ali-Ha¨ımoud October 8th 2019 The Riemann tensor quantifies the curvature of spacetime, as we will see in this lecture and the next. RIEMANN TENSOR: BASIC PROPERTIES α γ Definition { Given any vector field V , r[αrβ]V is a tensor field. Let us compute its components in some coordinate system: σ σ λ σ σ λ r[µrν]V = @[µ(rν]V ) − Γ[µν]rλV + Γλ[µrν]V σ σ λ σ λ λ ρ = @[µ(@ν]V + Γν]λV ) + Γλ[µ @ν]V + Γν]ρV 1 = @ Γσ + Γσ Γρ V λ ≡ Rσ V λ; (1) [µ ν]λ ρ[µ ν]λ 2 λµν where all partial derivatives of V µ cancel out after antisymmetrization. σ Since the left-hand side is a tensor field and V is a vector field, we conclude that R λµν is a tensor field as well { this is the tensor division theorem, which I encourage you to think about on your own. You can also check that explicitly from the transformation law of Christoffel symbols. This is the Riemann tensor, which measures the non-commutation of second derivatives of vector fields { remember that second derivatives of scalar fields do commute, by assumption. It is completely determined by the metric, and is linear in its second derivatives. Expression in LICS { In a LICS the Christoffel symbols vanish but not their derivatives. Let us compute the latter: 1 1 @ Γσ = @ gσδ (@ g + @ g − @ g ) = ησδ (@ @ g + @ @ g − @ @ g ) ; (2) µ νλ 2 µ ν λδ λ νδ δ νλ 2 µ ν λδ µ λ νδ µ δ νλ since the first derivatives of the metric components (thus of its inverse as well) vanish in a LICS.
    [Show full text]
  • Solving the Geodesic Equation
    Solving the Geodesic Equation Jeremy Atkins December 12, 2018 Abstract We find the general form of the geodesic equation and discuss the closed form relation to find Christoffel symbols. We then show how to use metric independence to find Killing vector fields, which allow us to solve the geodesic equation when there are helpful symmetries. We also discuss a more general way to find Killing vector fields, and some of their properties as a Lie algebra. 1 The Variational Method We will exploit the following variational principle to characterize motion in general relativity: The world line of a free test particle between two timelike separated points extremizes the proper time between them. where a test particle is one that is not a significant source of spacetime cur- vature, and a free particles is one that is only under the influence of curved spacetime. Similarly to classical Lagrangian mechanics, we can use this to de- duce the equations of motion for a metric. The proper time along a timeline worldline between point A and point B for the metric gµν is given by Z B Z B µ ν 1=2 τAB = dτ = (−gµν (x)dx dx ) (1) A A using the Einstein summation notation, and µ, ν = 0; 1; 2; 3. We can parame- terize the four coordinates with the parameter σ where σ = 0 at A and σ = 1 at B. This gives us the following equation for the proper time: Z 1 dxµ dxν 1=2 τAB = dσ −gµν (x) (2) 0 dσ dσ We can treat the integrand as a Lagrangian, dxµ dxν 1=2 L = −gµν (x) (3) dσ dσ and it's clear that the world lines extremizing proper time are those that satisfy the Euler-Lagrange equation: @L d @L − = 0 (4) @xµ dσ @(dxµ/dσ) 1 These four equations together give the equation for the worldline extremizing the proper time.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Introducing Riemannian Geometry
    3. Introducing Riemannian Geometry We have yet to meet the star of the show. There is one object that we can place on a manifold whose importance dwarfs all others, at least when it comes to understanding gravity. This is the metric. The existence of a metric brings a whole host of new concepts to the table which, collectively, are called Riemannian geometry.Infact,strictlyspeakingwewillneeda slightly di↵erent kind of metric for our study of gravity, one which, like the Minkowski metric, has some strange minus signs. This is referred to as Lorentzian Geometry and a slightly better name for this section would be “Introducing Riemannian and Lorentzian Geometry”. However, for our immediate purposes the di↵erences are minor. The novelties of Lorentzian geometry will become more pronounced later in the course when we explore some of the physical consequences such as horizons. 3.1 The Metric In Section 1, we informally introduced the metric as a way to measure distances between points. It does, indeed, provide this service but it is not its initial purpose. Instead, the metric is an inner product on each vector space Tp(M). Definition:Ametric g is a (0, 2) tensor field that is: Symmetric: g(X, Y )=g(Y,X). • Non-Degenerate: If, for any p M, g(X, Y ) =0forallY T (M)thenX =0. • 2 p 2 p p With a choice of coordinates, we can write the metric as g = g (x) dxµ dx⌫ µ⌫ ⌦ The object g is often written as a line element ds2 and this expression is abbreviated as 2 µ ⌫ ds = gµ⌫(x) dx dx This is the form that we saw previously in (1.4).
    [Show full text]
  • The Riemann Curvature Tensor
    The Riemann Curvature Tensor Jennifer Cox May 6, 2019 Project Advisor: Dr. Jonathan Walters Abstract A tensor is a mathematical object that has applications in areas including physics, psychology, and artificial intelligence. The Riemann curvature tensor is a tool used to describe the curvature of n-dimensional spaces such as Riemannian manifolds in the field of differential geometry. The Riemann tensor plays an important role in the theories of general relativity and gravity as well as the curvature of spacetime. This paper will provide an overview of tensors and tensor operations. In particular, properties of the Riemann tensor will be examined. Calculations of the Riemann tensor for several two and three dimensional surfaces such as that of the sphere and torus will be demonstrated. The relationship between the Riemann tensor for the 2-sphere and 3-sphere will be studied, and it will be shown that these tensors satisfy the general equation of the Riemann tensor for an n-dimensional sphere. The connection between the Gaussian curvature and the Riemann curvature tensor will also be shown using Gauss's Theorem Egregium. Keywords: tensor, tensors, Riemann tensor, Riemann curvature tensor, curvature 1 Introduction Coordinate systems are the basis of analytic geometry and are necessary to solve geomet- ric problems using algebraic methods. The introduction of coordinate systems allowed for the blending of algebraic and geometric methods that eventually led to the development of calculus. Reliance on coordinate systems, however, can result in a loss of geometric insight and an unnecessary increase in the complexity of relevant expressions. Tensor calculus is an effective framework that will avoid the cons of relying on coordinate systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Derivation of the Geodesic Equation and Defining the Christoffel Symbols
    Derivation of the Geodesic Equation and De¯ning the Christo®el Symbols Dr. Russell L. Herman March 13, 2008 We begin with the line element 2 ® ¯ ds = g®¯dx dx (1) where g®¯ is the metric with ®; ¯ = 0; 1; 2; 3. Also, we are using the Einstein summation convention in which we sum over repeated indices which occur as a subscript and superscript pair. In order to ¯nd the geodesic equation, we use the variational principle which states that freely falling test particles follow a path between two ¯xed points in spacetime which extremizes the proper time, ¿. The proper time is de¯ned by d¿ 2 = ¡ds2: (We are assuming that c = 1.) So, formally, we have Z B p Z B q 2 ® ¯ ¿AB = ¡ds = ¡g®¯dx dx : A A In order to write this as an integral that we can compute, we consider a parametrized worldline, x® = x®(σ); where the parameter σ = 0 at point A and σ = 1 at point B. Then, we write Z 1 · ® ¯ ¸1=2 Z 1 · ® ¸ dx dx dx ® ¿AB = ¡g®¯ dσ ´ L ; x dσ: (2) 0 dσ dσ 0 dσ £ ¤ dx® ® Here we have introduced the Lagrangian, L dσ ; x : We note also that d¿ L = : dσ Therefore, for functions f = f(¿(σ)), we have df df d¿ df = = L : dσ d¿ dσ d¿ We will use this later to change derivatives with respect to our arbitrary pa- rameter σ to derivatives with respect to the proper time, ¿: 1 Using variational methods as seen in classical dynamics, we obtain the Euler- Lagrange equations in the form µ ¶ d @L @L ¡ + = 0: (3) dσ @(dxγ /dσ) @xγ We carefully compute these derivatives for the general metric.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartan Connection and Curvature Forms
    CARTAN CONNECTION AND CURVATURE FORMS Syafiq Johar syafi[email protected] Contents 1 Connections and Riemannian Curvature 1 1.1 Affine Connection . .1 1.2 Levi-Civita Connection and Riemannian Curvature . .2 1.3 Riemannian Curvature . .3 2 Covariant External Derivative 4 2.1 Connection Form . .4 2.2 Curvature Form . .5 2.3 Explicit Formula for E = TM ..................................5 2.4 Levi-Civita Connection and Riemannian Curvature Revisited . .6 3 An Application: Uniformisation Theorem via PDEs 6 1 Connections and Riemannian Curvature Cartan formula is a way of generalising the Riemannian curvature for a Riemannian manifold (M; g) of dimension n to a differentiable manifold. We start by defining the Riemannian manifold and curvatures. We begin by defining the usual notion of connection and the Levi-Civita connection. 1.1 Affine Connection Definition 1.1 (Affine connection). Let M be a differentiable manifold and E a vector bundle over M. A connection or covariant derivative at a point p 2 M is a map D : Γ(E) ! Γ(T ∗M ⊗ E) with the 1 properties for any V; W 2 TpM; σ; τ 2 Γ(E) and f 2 C (M), we have that DV σ 2 Ep with the following properties: 1. D is tensorial over TpM i.e. DfV +W σ = fDV σ + DW σ: 2. D is R-linear in Γ(E) i.e. DV (σ + τ) = DV σ + DV τ: 3. D satisfies the Leibniz rule over Γ(E) i.e. if f 2 C1(M), we have DV (fσ) = df(V ) · σ + fDV σ: Note that we did not require any condition of the metric g on the manifold, nor the bundle metric on E in the abstract definition of a connection.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1412.2393V4 [Gr-Qc] 27 Feb 2019 2.6 Geodesics and Normal Coordinates
    Riemannian Geometry: Definitions, Pictures, and Results Adam Marsh February 27, 2019 Abstract A pedagogical but concise overview of Riemannian geometry is provided, in the context of usage in physics. The emphasis is on defining and visualizing concepts and relationships between them, as well as listing common confusions, alternative notations and jargon, and relevant facts and theorems. Special attention is given to detailed figures and geometric viewpoints, some of which would seem to be novel to the literature. Topics are avoided which are well covered in textbooks, such as historical motivations, proofs and derivations, and tools for practical calculations. As much material as possible is developed for manifolds with connection (omitting a metric) to make clear which aspects can be readily generalized to gauge theories. The presentation in most cases does not assume a coordinate frame or zero torsion, and the coordinate-free, tensor, and Cartan formalisms are developed in parallel. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Parallel transport 3 2.1 The parallel transporter . 3 2.2 The covariant derivative . 4 2.3 The connection . 5 2.4 The covariant derivative in terms of the connection . 6 2.5 The parallel transporter in terms of the connection . 9 arXiv:1412.2393v4 [gr-qc] 27 Feb 2019 2.6 Geodesics and normal coordinates . 9 2.7 Summary . 10 3 Manifolds with connection 11 3.1 The covariant derivative on the tensor algebra . 12 3.2 The exterior covariant derivative of vector-valued forms . 13 3.3 The exterior covariant derivative of algebra-valued forms . 15 3.4 Torsion . 16 3.5 Curvature .
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Forms on Riemannian (Lorentzian) and Riemann-Cartan
    Differential Forms on Riemannian (Lorentzian) and Riemann-Cartan Structures and Some Applications to Physics∗ Waldyr Alves Rodrigues Jr. Institute of Mathematics Statistics and Scientific Computation IMECC-UNICAMP CP 6065 13083760 Campinas SP Brazil e-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] May 28, 2018 Abstract In this paper after recalling some essential tools concerning the theory of differential forms in the Cartan, Hodge and Clifford bundles over a Riemannian or Riemann-Cartan space or a Lorentzian or Riemann-Cartan spacetime we solve with details several exercises involving different grades of difficult. One of the problems is to show that a recent formula given in [10] for the exterior covariant derivative of the Hodge dual of the torsion 2-forms is simply wrong. We believe that the paper will be useful for students (and eventually for some experts) on applications of differential geometry to some physical problems. A detailed account of the issues discussed in the paper appears in the table of contents. Contents 1 Introduction 3 arXiv:0712.3067v6 [math-ph] 4 Dec 2008 2 Classification of Metric Compatible Structures (M; g;D) 4 2.1 Levi-Civita and Riemann-Cartan Connections . 5 2.2 Spacetime Structures . 5 3 Absolute Differential and Covariant Derivatives 5 ∗published in: Ann. Fond. L. de Broglie 32 (special issue dedicate to torsion), 424-478 (2008). 1 ^ 4 Calculus on the Hodge Bundle ( T ∗M; ·; τg) 8 4.1 Exterior Product . 8 4.2 Scalar Product and Contractions . 9 4.3 Hodge Star Operator ? ........................ 9 4.4 Exterior derivative d and Hodge coderivative δ .
    [Show full text]