======PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK
= = = REPORT ON CONSULTATION AND PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS
MARCH 2005 = = =
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE table of contents
1 INTRODUCTION
2 STATUTORY CONSULTEES & ORGANISATIONS
3 COMMUNITY CONSULTATION
4 SUMMARY
APPENDICES = APPENDIX A: INVITEES AND ATTENDEES AT PRESENTATION AND WORKSHOP
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 1
1 introduction
qÜÉ=m~êâä~åÇ=d~íÉï~ó=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=Ü~ë=ÄÉÉå=éêÉé~êÉÇ=Äó= `çêÄó=_çêçìÖÜ=`çìåÅáä=~åÇ=`~í~äóëí=`çêÄó=íç=éêçîáÇÉ=íÜÉ=ÅçåíÉñí=Ñçê=ÑìíìêÉ= áåîÉëíãÉåí=~åÇ=ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåí=áå=íÜÉ=m~êâä~åÇ=d~íÉï~ó=~êÉ~=ïÜáÅÜ=ïáää=~Åí=~ë= ~=Å~í~äóëí=Ñçê=íÜÉ=êÉÖÉåÉê~íáçå=çÑ=`çêÄó=qçïå=`ÉåíêÉK=qÜÉ=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí= cê~ãÉïçêâ=ïáää=éêçîáÇÉ=éä~ååáåÖ=~åÇ=ÇÉëáÖå=ÖìáÇ~åÅÉ=Ñçê=ÑìíìêÉ= ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåíK= = qÜÉ=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=Ü~ë=ÄÉÉå=éêÉé~êÉÇ=ïáíÜáå=íÜÉ=ÅçåíÉñí=çÑ= å~íáçå~ä=~åÇ=êÉÖáçå~ä=éçäáÅó=ÖìáÇ~åÅÉ=~åÇ=íÜÉ=`çêÄó=içÅ~ä=mä~åK=fí=ëÉíë=çìí=~= îáëáçå=Ñçê=íÜÉ=m~êâä~åÇ=d~íÉï~ó=~êÉ~=~åÇ=çÄàÉÅíáîÉë=~åÇ=éêáåÅáéäÉë=íç=ÖìáÇÉ= êÉÖÉåÉê~íáçå=~åÇ=ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåí=~åÇ=ÉãÄê~ÅÉë=~=äçÅ~ä=ìêÖÉåÅó=Ñçê=éçëáíáîÉ= ÅÜ~åÖÉ=áå=íÜÉ=qçïå=`ÉåíêÉK==mìÄäáÅ=Åçåëìäí~íáçå=ÇìêáåÖ=éêÉé~ê~íáçå=çÑ=íÜÉ= oÉÖÉåÉê~íáçå=cê~ãÉïçêâ=~åÇ=ïáÇÉê=ëí~âÉÜçäÇÉê=áåîçäîÉãÉåí=Ü~ë=ÄÉÉå= áãéçêí~åí=áå=íÜÉ=éêÉé~ê~íáçå=çÑ=éêçéçë~äë=Ñçê=íÜÉ=m~êâä~åÇ=d~íÉï~óK= `çåëìäí~íáçå=Ü~ë=ÄÉÉå=ìåÇÉêí~âÉå=çå=íÜÉ=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=~åÇ=ïáää= ÅçåíáåìÉ=íÜêçìÖÜçìí=íÜÉ=éêçÅÉëë=çÑ=íÜÉ=éêÉé~ê~íáçå=çÑ=ÇÉí~áäÉÇ=ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåí= éêçéçë~äëK== = qÜÉ=Çê~Ñí=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=Ü~ë=ÄÉÉå=íÜÉ=ëìÄàÉÅí=çÑ=~å=áåÇÉéÉåÇÉåí= pìëí~áå~Äáäáíó=^ééê~áë~ä=~åÇ=ÅÜ~åÖÉë=íç=íÜÉ=aê~Ñí=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ= ~êÉ=éêçéçëÉÇ=áå=êÉëéçåëÉ=íç=íÜÉ=êÉÅçããÉåÇ~íáçåë=ëÉí=çìí=áå=íÜáë=ÇçÅìãÉåíK= = qÜÉ=aê~Ñí=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=Ü~ë=ÄÉÉå=éêÉé~êÉÇ=ÑçääçïáåÖ= Åçåëìäí~íáçå=ïáíÜ=íÜÉ=äçÅ~ä=Åçããìåáíó=~åÇ=ëí~âÉÜçäÇÉêë=áå=êÉëéÉÅí=çÑ=íÜÉ= çîÉê~ää=oÉÖÉåÉê~íáçå=cê~ãÉïçêâ=~åÇ=íÜÉ=ÑìíìêÉ=ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåí=çÑ=íÜÉ= m~êâä~åÇ=d~íÉï~ó=~êÉ~K=qÜÉ=aê~Ñí=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=Ü~ë=~äëç=ÄÉÉå= íÜÉ=ëìÄàÉÅí=çÑ=~=Ñìää=éìÄäáÅ=Åçåëìäí~íáçå=éêçÅÉëëK== = qÜáë=êÉéçêí=ëìãã~êáëÉë=íÜÉ=Åçåëìäí~íáçå=ìåÇÉêí~âÉå=~åÇ=íÜÉ=êÉëéçåëÉë= êÉÅÉáîÉÇK=qÜÉ=ëÅÜÉÇìäÉë=ëìãã~êáëÉ=íÜÉ=êÉëéçåëÉë=êÉÅÉáîÉÇ=~åÇ=éêçéçëÉÇ= ~ãÉåÇãÉåíë=íç=íÜÉ=Çê~Ñí=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâK= = CONSULTATION PROCESS = qÜÉ=Åçåëìäí~íáçå=éÉêáçÇ=ê~å=Ñêçã=ãáÇ=g~åì~êó=OMMR=íç=OU=cÉÄêì~êó=OMMRK= `çåëìäí~íáçå=ÅçãéêáëÉÇ=íÜÉ=ÑçääçïáåÖ=ÉäÉãÉåíëW= = áK iÉííÉêë=~åÇ=ÅçéáÉë=çÑ=íÜÉ=ÇçÅìãÉåí=ïÉêÉ=ëÉåí=íç==RP=ëí~íìíçêó= ÅçåëìäíÉÉë=~åÇ=çêÖ~åáë~íáçåëX= ááK ^=äÉ~ÑäÉí=Åçåí~áåáåÖ=~=ëìãã~êó=çÑ=íÜÉ=aê~Ñí=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí= cê~ãÉïçêâ=ï~ë=ÇÉäáîÉêÉÇ=íç=ÉîÉêó=ÜçìëÉÜçäÇ=áå=`çêÄóX= áááK ^=mìÄäáÅ=bñÜáÄáíáçå=çÑ=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äë=ï~ë=ÜÉäÇ=áå=íÜÉ=táääçïë=^êíë= `ÉåíêÉI=dÉçêÖÉ=píêÉÉí=Ñêçã=PN=g~åì~êóJ=NO=cÉÄêì~êó=OMMRX=
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 2
áîK hÉó=ëí~âÉÜçäÇÉêë=~åÇ=êÉéêÉëÉåí~íáîÉë=çÑ=äçÅ~ä=çêÖ~åáë~íáçåë=ïÉêÉ= áåîáíÉÇ=íç=~ííÉåÇ=~=éêÉëÉåí~íáçå=~åÇ=ÑÉÉÇÄ~Åâ=çå=íÜÉ=aê~Ñí= aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=çå=NS=cÉÄêì~êó=OMMRJMPJMQ= ==== pÉÅíáçå=O=ëÉíë=çìí=íÜÉ=êÉëéçåëÉë=êÉÅÉáîÉÇ=Ñêçã=ëí~íìíçêó=ÅçåëìäíÉÉë=~åÇ= pÉÅíáçå=P=ëìãã~êáëÉë=íÜÉ=êÉëéçåëÉ=íç=éìÄäáÅ=Åçåëìäí~íáçåK=
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 3
= 2 statutory consultees
RESPONSES RECEIVED `çåëìäí~íáçå=äÉííÉêë=ïÉêÉ=ëÉåí=íç=RP=ëí~íìíçêó=ÅçåëìäíÉÉë=~åÇ=çêÖ~åáë~íáçåëK=^= íçí~ä=çÑ==S=ëí~íìíçêó=ÅçåëìäíÉÉë=~åÇ=çêÖ~åáë~íáçåë=êÉëéçåÇÉÇ=~ë=í~ÄäÉÇ=ÄÉäçïK= ^=ëìãã~êó=çÑ=íÜÉ=ÅçããÉåíë=êÉÅÉáîÉÇ=Ñêçã=ëí~íìíçêó=ÅçåëìäíÉÉë=~åÇ=íÜÉ= éêçéçëÉÇ=ÅÜ~åÖÉë=íç=íÜÉ=aê~Ñí=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=~êÉ=áë=ëÉí=çìí=áå=íÜÉ= ~ÅÅçãé~åóáåÖ=ëÅÜÉÇìäÉK= = Table 1: Statutory Consultees and organisations invited to respond to the Draft Development Framework = Response No. Organisation received 1 Connexions Corby 2 Anglian Water 3 British Telecom plc 4 BT Plant Enquiries 5 CABE 6 Cable & Wireless Plant Enquiries 7 Corby & East Northants Chamber of Trade 8 Corby & East Northants Constituency Office 9 Corby Ambulance Station 10 Corby Business Group 11 Corby Community College 12 Corby Community Hospital 13 Corby Community Safety Partnership 14 Corby Community Transport 15 Corby Fire Station 16 Corby Hackney Owners Association 17 Corby Police Station 18 CPRE (National Office) Yes 19 CYPLD 20 Department for Transport 21 East Midlands Electricity (Southern Zone) 22 East Midlands Electricity 23 English Heritage Yes 24 English Nature Yes 25 English Partnerships
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 4
Response No. Organisation received 26 Environment Agency 27 Forestry Commission 28 Forestry Commission (Forest Enterprise) Yes 29 Friends of the Earth- East Midlands Region 30 Government Office for the East Midlands 31 Highways Agency 32 Midland Mainline 33 Network Rail 34 Northampton Borough Council 35 Northamptonshire Archaeological Society 36 Northamptonshire County Council Highways 37 Northamptonshire CPRE 38 Northamptonshire Federation of Environmental Groups 39 Northamptonshire Fire & Rescue 40 Northamptonshire Police Headquarters 41 Office of the Deputy Prime Minister 42 Network Rail Yes 43 Rockingham Forest Trust 44 RSPB 45 Rural Transport Partnership 46 Strategic Rail Authority 47 The Countryside Agency 48 The National Grid 49 Transco 50 Two Shires Ambulance NHS Trust 51 Wildlife Trust 52 Wildlife Trust for Northamptonshire Yes 53 Willowbrook Health Centre
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 5
= = qÜÉ=êÉëéçåëÉë=~åÇ=éêçéçëÉÇ=ÅÜ~åÖÉë=íç=íÜÉ=aê~Ñí=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ= ~êÉ=ëìãã~êáëÉÇ=áå=íÜÉ=ÑçääçïáåÖ=ëÅÜÉÇìäÉK= = kç=çÄàÉÅíáçåë=Ü~îÉ=ÄÉÉå=êÉÅÉáîÉÇ=Ñçêã=ëí~íìíçêó=ÅçåëìäíÉÉë=çê=çíÜÉê= çêÖ~åáë~íáçåë=íç=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äë=áå=íÜÉ=aÉîÉäÉçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâK= = qÜêÉÉ=çÑ=íÜÉ=ëáñ=êÉëéçåëÉë=êÉÅÉáîÉÇ=ïÉêÉ=Ñêçã=çêÖ~åáë~íáçåë=ïáíÜ=~=ÇáêÉÅí= áåíÉêÉëí=~åÇ=áåîçäîÉãÉåí=áå=íÜÉ=ÑìíìêÉ=çÑ=íÜÉ=ïççÇä~åÇJ=båÖäáëÜ=k~íìêÉI=qÜÉ= cçêÉëíêó=`çããáëëáçå=~åÇ=qÜÉ=táäÇäáÑÉ=qêìëíK=^ää=çÑ=íÜÉëÉ=çêÖ~åáë~íáçåë=Ü~îÉ= ÄÉÉå=áåîçäîÉÇ=áå=íÜÉ=éêÉé~ê~íáçå=çÑ=íÜÉ=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=~åÇ=~ää= Ü~îÉ=ÉñéêÉëëÉÇ=ëìééçêí=Ñçê=íÜÉ=éêáåÅáéäÉë=çÑ=íÜÉ=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ= ~åÇ=ïáëÜ=íç=ÅçåíáåìÉ=íç=ÄÉ=áåîçäîÉÇ=áå=íÜÉ=éêÉé~ê~íáçå=~åÇ=áãéäÉãÉåí~íáçå= çÑ=íÜÉ=j~å~ÖÉãÉåí=mä~åK==kçåÉ=çÑ=íÜÉëÉ=çêÖ~åáë~íáçåë=Ü~îÉ=ê~áëÉÇ=çÄàÉÅíáçåë= íç=íÜÉ=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=çå=íÜÉ=ÖêçìåÇë=çÑ=áãé~Åíë=çå=íÜÉ=ÉñáëíáåÖ= ïççÇä~åÇ=~åÇ=íÜÉ=êÉëéçåëÉë=êÉÅÉáîÉÇ=ÜáÖÜäáÖÜí=íÜÉ=ëçÅá~äI=ÉÅçäçÖáÅ~ä=~åÇ= ÉåîáêçåãÉåí~ä=ÄÉåÉÑáíë=ïÜáÅÜ=ÅçìäÇ=ÄÉ=~ÅÜáÉîÉÇ=íÜêçìÖÜ=ÉÑÑÉÅíáîÉ= ã~å~ÖÉãÉåí=çÑ=íÜÉ=ïççÇä~åÇK=== = qÜÉ=çíÜÉê=äÉííÉêë=áåÅäìÇÉ=~=äÉííÉê=çÑ=ëìééçêí=Ñêçã=íÜÉ=`~ãé~áÖå=Ñçê=íÜÉ= mêçíÉÅíáçå=çÑ=oìê~ä=båÖä~åÇK=qÜÉ=äÉííÉêë=Ñêçã=båÖäáëÜ=eÉêáí~ÖÉ=~åÇ=kÉíïçêâ= o~áä=ÜáÖÜäáÖÜí=íÜÉ=åÉÉÇ=Ñçê=çåJÖçáåÖ=Åçåëìäí~íáçå=áå=í~âáåÖ=éêçéçë~äë=Ñçêï~êÇ= áå=íÜÉ=m~êâä~åÇ=d~íÉï~ó=çê=ÉäëÉïÜÉêÉ=áå=íÜÉ=íçïå=ÅÉåíêÉK= = ^=åìãÄÉê=çÑ=ãçÇáÑáÅ~íáçåë=íç=íÜÉ=íÉñí=çÑ=íÜÉ=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=Ü~îÉ= ÄÉÉå=ëìÖÖÉëíÉÇ=íç=ëíêÉåÖíÜÉå=íÜÉ=çÄàÉÅíáîÉë=êÉä~íáåÖ=íç=ÄáçÇáîÉêëáíóI= ÉåîáêçåãÉåí~ä=ÉåÜ~åÅÉãÉåí=~åÇ=ã~å~ÖÉãÉåí=çÑ=íÜÉ=ïççÇä~åÇ=~åÇ=áí=áë= êÉÅçããÉåÇÉÇ=íÜ~í=íÜÉëÉ=ãçÇáÑáÅ~íáçåë=~êÉ=ã~ÇÉ=íç=êÉÑäÉÅí=íÜÉ=ÅçããÉåíë= êÉÅÉáîÉÇK== =
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 1
Table 2: Summary of responses received from Statutory Consultees and organisations and proposed modifications to Development Framework
Organisation Summary of Response to Consultation Comments Proposed Modifications to Draft Development Framework CPRE Recognise need to improve ambience of towns to make them Observations noted. High quality No Change desirable places to live. Support for vision and need to development and use of local address poor quality and range of shops, unwelcoming materials will be encouraged. nature of town centre and lack of evening economy, lack of Design for civic hub will be sheltered areas of shopping and draughty alleys. Need to required to be of a high avoid gimmicky architecture (as shown in some of architectural quality and to create illustrations used in Development Brief)- requirement for a a distinctive landmark building more civic component and buildings which are sound and (Design Principles, p 50) long lasting. Town Square should be fronted by buildings of substance-use of stone or brick rather than glass and less sustainable materials/design. Support for more traditional design and materials- potential for vertical feature such as campinale in St Marks Square Venice at corner of square.
Not impressed by proposals for TOPS development- too low TOPS development is not covered No Change for urban context at two storeys. Corporation Street would by Development Framework but have a more human scale if glass and steel canopies to be principles set out in the Corby replaced by new canopy. Need for covered shopping mall to Regenertaion Framework apply. provide more attractive place to shop. Reference is made to PPS6 and encouragement of mixed use and multi-storey developments to make more efficient use of land. Height of development should take into account the character of surrounding area. Potential for taller buildings will be considered (Design Principles, p 51). Illustrations are provided of examples of new developments elsewhere which have promoted area regeneration.
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 2
Doubt economic viability of station- need to improve road Outside scope of Development No Change connections with dualling of A43/A6003 link and A6116 to Framework. Proposals do not provide direct link to A14. depend upon railway station or conflict with possible future highway improvements
Commend intention to make parkland more user friendly. Support welcomed Best trees should be maintained and augmented. Requirement for parkland to meet needs of growing population.
Multi-storey carpark should be clad with buildings not left as The Development Framework Include reference to design of gaunt concrete structure. Ground level parking should be promotes a high standard of multi-storey carpark under Design landscaped- support dual use of car parks. design in all development principles (p 56)
New buildings should be substantial civic structures not High quality of building design is No change transient glass boxes. encouraged throughout Parkland Gateway . Design for Civic Hub will be required to create a landmark building
Support need to address key issues (p18) Support welcomed No change
Concern about urban sprawl. Need to control warehousing Development Framework No change and promote high tech industry and services to promote local promotes re-use of previously economy. developed land and higher density mixed sue development in accordance with Government guidance. This will assist in controlling urban sprawl.
Agree with objectives (p36-37) including overlooking of Support welcomed woodland with housing to give sense of security to users and encourage in-town living. Should encourage housing around green squares.
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 3
Need for wind tunnel test to establish conditions in square Comments noted Reference to be included to before designs approved. creating comfortable environment and micro-climate in Town Square (p 54)
Missed opportunity not to build an Olympic size pool. Brief for pool to be prepared by Corby Borough Council. Comments noted.
Resiting of taxi rank may not be as convenient but will Exclusion of taxis dependent on remove a source of pollution. reprovision of suitably located facilities to ensure that operators and users are not disadvantaged (p 46).
Support objective of high quality design but some of building Development Framework Include reference in Design examples will not last like older civic buildings- designs must promoted high quality design and principles to use of good quality be cohesive, not repetitive and built of brick or stone. creation of distinctive landmark materials (p 50) buildings. Development will be required to adhere to Design Principles to ensure cohesiveness.
Require preparation of briefs to ensure high quality Development Briefs will be Clarify requirement for preparation development- including guidance on height, materials and prepared in accordance with of development briefs (p 61) use and access. Design Principles set out in Development Framerwork. Reference to preparation of Development Briefs included (p 61)
Preference for Architect design gauleiter to ensure visual and Comments noted. Implementation Reinforce need for comprehensive functional compatability to central core- area must be dealt and design will be addressed in a approach to deisgn as one of with comprehensively. comprehensive way. underpinning principles (p 61)
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 4
Much to commend and support- depends upon detailed Agreed. Design principles will design. assist in promoting high quality design and development.
Support for town centre shop unit to be set up as permanent There will be consultation at each but changing exhibition with facilities for comments. Passing stage of the development process. shoppers more likely to drop in than to library or other one-off Further consideration will be given consultation venues to consultation venue in town centre. English Heritage Ancient woodland sites are important historic sites as well as Noted Amend text (p 52) to include being important for their biodiversity. Advise that County reference to requirement for Council archaeologists (Built and Natural Environment consultation with English Nature, Section) are consulted regarding any proposed works in English Heritage, County woodland in accordance with PPG16 and in development of Archaeologists and other relevant Woodland Management Plan (p.62) bodies regarding any development proposals affecting woodland
Highlights opportunities to promote industrial heritage of town Noted Add reference to opportunities to eg: through interpretation or use of former mineral lines as reflect heritage of town in Design footpath and cycle links Guidelines
English Nature Main interest relates to the impacts on Thoroughsale and Support and continued Hazel Woods. and in particular, to the potential loss of semi involvement of English Nature in natural ancient woodland –‘an irreplaceable natural and cultural asset’. However, recognise that woodland is a Woodland Management Plan fantastic but currently underused resource for the people of welcomed. Corby. English Nature therefore welcomes the inclusion of the woodland as an integral element of the Parkland Gateway concept, and supports the stated objectives of
protecting and enhancing the biodiversity value and making it more accessible to the general public. The ‘People and Nature’ programme recognises that: • Nature can improve the quality of our lives and everyone is entitled to experience it; • Everyone should have easy access to nature, in ways that suit their individual situation;
• Most people value everyday nature rather than nature that is rare or hard to see, and our contact with it can take place anywhere and at any time - at home, on the
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 5
way to work or school, or on holiday; • Improving local environments for people and nature will bring economic, social and health benefits.
English Nature acknowledge that, with appropriate management, Hazel Wood can make a significant contribution to this agenda. Also accept that an original approach is needed to bring the woodland into better management and to make it more attractive to Corby residents.
Satisfied that the draft Development Framework attempts to address this issue in a balanced way.
English Nature supports the requirement for a management Agreed. This is reflected in No change plan as an essential prerequisite of development and looks forward to being consulted on the preparation of the plan. Development Framework Highlights importance of implementation of the plan. A realistic assessment must be made of the long term management costs of the woodland and the identified mechanisms must ensure that appropriate resources are made available.
Support the designation of Thoroughsale and Hazel Woods Potential for designation as LNR is Strengthen reference to potential as a Local Nature Reserve (LNR). LNRs can contribute highlighted in Development designation as LNR (p 63) directly to the welfare of local communities, providing Framework excellent opportunities for people to become more involved in the management of their local environment. An LNR as an element of the Parkland Gateway proposals would also provide a visible sign to the residents of Corby that the Borough Council’s is committed to nature conservation.
Look forward to continued involvement as the Parkland Continued support welcomed Gateway moves forward.
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 6
Forestry Commission Aspiration of development Framework to reconnect Corby’s Support welcomed Amend text to make clear that social centre to its ancient woodland is excellent and is Management Plan will relate to endorsed as an aspiration. However, overall woodland whole of Thoroughslae Wood and management plan not just for Hazel Wood but whole of Hazel Wood (p 62) Thoroughsale Wood complex will be critical not just for nature conservation but to realise the social and community benefits of the woodland. Management plan is no use unless it is implemenatble.
Forest Enterprise would like to be part of process of Support and continued developing management plan for whole of Thoroughsale involvement in Management Plan Wood complex and working with community and welcomed. Involvement of relevant stakeholders to bring Rockingham Forest alive at the heart of bodies and community referred to Corby. Expertise in ancient woodlands and solid track record in Development Framework (p 62) in delivering high quality products at low cost where external funding provided. Local team based in Rockingham Forest.
Main routes through woods- fear of crime will be one of Comments noted Include reference to possible use biggest hurdles in encouraging wider population to reengage of board walks in Design principles in woodland- should look at option of creating main routes (p 55) and Management Plan through the woods as wide raised boardwalks with good guidance (p62-63) lighting and hand rails. Use of board walk will provide protection and help limit erosion from pedestrian traffic and encourage re-vegetation by natural flora (and fauna) alongside main arteries. Use of board walks will be visually more aesthetic than a 10m width ride without undue impact on ancient woodland.
Buildings at end of boating lake- no clear statement on Reference is included to leisure Include reference to possible what buildings will be used for. Support new quality café with related development at northern café/restaurant (p39) and reference good play facilities as interface between wood/lake and end of boating lake. Uses will be to possible benefits for woodland grassland recreation area. If well designed, could also be an further considered in preparation management in guidelines for evening venue and thereby limit anti-social behaviour. Long of Management Plan Management Plan (p 62) term revenues from a well managed café/restaurant may help to underping the long term woodland management costs. Could also explore whether a social enterprise could
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 7
be established to produce wood products for re-use in Corby and/or sale to public. Opportunities to extend to link with other existing woodland craft initiatives elsewhere in forest eg: Rockingham Forest Craft Guild likely to be based at new visitor centre at Top Lodge- Fineshade Woods.- .
Security Cameras or Wildlife Camera- Red Comments noted. Will be Include reference to possible kites@Rockingham centre has used remote camera links to considered in preparation of security or wildlife camera in bring wildlife images back to a central viewing point. Could Management Plan guidelines for Management Plan (p set up similar wildlife camera system to celebrate wildlife of 62) Thoroughsale Woods.
Community Woodland Group- best way to ensure Development Framework Amplify text relating to community sustainable management of woods is to create a community highlights importance of involvement (p 63) volunteer group- possibly as an extension to or amalgam of involvement of local community in one of the existing volunteer programmes operating in the management of woodland area already eg: Rockingahm Forest Volunteer Group (managed by Forestry Enterprise) or BTCV.
Look forward to assisting in drawing up woodland Support welcomed management plan.
Network Rail Midlands Note that although the Parkland Gateway area does not Station is outside Parkland include a proposal for a new railway station specifically, a Gateway development Framework station is proposed as part of the wider Corby Central Framework Area (page 28/29). area.
Any new station would need to be technically, operationally Comments noted. Consultation and commercially feasible and have the support of the train will be undertaken in relation to operating company(ies). Any new station would also need any proposals relating to station support from the Strategic Rail Authority or the Department for Transport.
Interested in discussing the proposal in more detail with the Council, including how it is proposed to fund the new station. In addition, I would be interested to learn whether or not the station is linked to any particular development scheme.
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 8
Wildlife Trust Pleased to see proposals that seek the regeneration of Welcome support and continued Northamptonshire Corby town centre and in particular welcome those designed involvement in Management Plan to enhance the biodiversity value of the town.
The Wildlife Trust has been closely involved in the development of this Framework through the series of workshop consultations. Pleased to acknowledge the recognition of the importance of Hazel and Thoroughsale
Woods both as a biodiversity and a community resource.
Feel that the Framework could go further in promoting the Comments noted. Enhancement of Amplify references to objective of protection and enhancement of this woodland Wildlife Site natural environment is a principle delivering net gain in biodiversity both in its own right and within the wider Borough context. In objective of the Development in The Vision for parkland Gateway keeping with policies outlined in RPG 8 and national planning Framework (p9) and Delivery & Implementation guidance, it will be important to ensure that the Development Framework seeks to deliver a net gain in biodiversity. This (p 61) will be especially vital due to the fragmented and isolated nature of Hazel and Thoroughsale Woods in relation to other complementary wildlife habitats. The Development Framework suggests that there will be some net loss of
habitat both from within, and at the edge of, Hazel and Thoroughsale Woods. Wildlife Trust acknowledge that the measures proposed will contribute toward the enhancement of the remaining woodland through sympathetic management and through designation as a Local Nature Reserve. However, recommend that the Framework also seeks to deliver biodiversity gain through additional planting and habitat creation wherever possible.
Understandably, in seeking the regeneration of the town Comments noted. This will be centre of Corby, the Development Framework tends to look addressed in preparation of from the built environment outwards and as such underestimates the value and potential of the existing Management Plan biodiversity resource. Recommend that a parallel assessment be made from the woodland perspective outwards so that opportunities for enhancement and biodiversity gain can be included within the development
brief.
Pg 7 Para 1; the introduction should acknowledge the Agreed Amend p 7 Para 1 contribution that the Parkland Gateway will make toward the protection and enhancement of Hazel and Thoroughsale Woods and in turn to the delivery of Biodiversity Action Plan
targets to which CBC is already a signatory.
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 9
Pg 9 Para 4; The Vision. This vision statement makes no Agreed Amend text p 9 Para 4 to include reference at all to the environment and biodiversity element that is one of the key fundamental principles of the enhancement of Sustainable Communities Plan. This is a glaring omission environment/biodiversity as a core and in our view this headline statement must be amended to objective of the Vision include reference to this equally important aspect of the vision as a core objective of beneficial delivery to the local community of Corby and beyond.
Pg 16 Para 7; this section states that the majority of the This will be addressed in the Amend p 16 Para 7 existing grassland is not of significant ecological value and preparation of the Management Include reference to requirement that instead is of recreational amenity value. More detailed Plan for more detailed ecological assessment of the grassland resource within Hazel and assessments in preparation of Thoroughsale Woods will need to be carried out before development options are decided. The Framework should Management Plan and also recognise that areas of, currently, low ecological value development proposals (p 62) may also offer opportunity for habitat restoration or creation. For example, any ecologically- poor grassland could be restored, through sympathetic management and supplementary seeding, or it may offer opportunities for further woodland planting to replace losses elsewhere. It is also important to acknowledge that ecologically- rich areas can also be of high amenity value where managed appropriately.
Pg 17; “Development Requirements” should also recognise This will be addressed in the Amend text p 17 the need to provide a facility from which park management Management Plan and community staff can operate. The presence of park staff and their location “within” the wood will have profound benefits, in terms of appreciation and understanding of the park and through minimisation and repair of any damage. This facility will need to provide office space as well as community access and tool storage space.
Pg 18 Para 6; welcome the inclusion of woodland Advice noted Amend p 18 Para 6 management and enhancement as a key issue.
Enhancement of the woodland should also be seen in terms of linkages and buffering, so that the woodland becomes more ecologically robust; as recognised by the Northamptonshire BAP and national planning policy (eg PPS9). In this respect the Framework should seek to deliver woodland linkages through the town that can serve to buffer the woodland from damaging impacts and provide green routes through the urban envelope.
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 10
The Framework should refer to current work, carried out by Reference is made to this work in Include reference to need for Landscape Design Associates, which aims to establish a framework for Green Infrastructure for the Borough. This the Development Framework (p 26 coordination of proposals with work has been commissioned by CBC, English Nature, and Para 3) Green Infrastructure Plan (p 26 NCC and should be completed by March 2005. Para 3)
Pg 23; Draft PPS 9 Nature Conservation should be referred Agreed Include reference to Draft PPS9 (p to. 23)
Pg 24 Para 3; the spatial framework of the MKSM study Advice noted Include reference (p 24 para 3) includes provision for biodiversity enhancement and Green Infrastructure which is relevant in relation to Hazel and
Thoroughsale Woods and Corby Borough.
Pg 25 Para 4; it is important to realise that the woodlands Agreed Amend p 25 Para 4 present within the town are also part of the wider Rockingham Forest area and as such the Framework should recognise this connection and seek to develop stronger links with this hinterland.
Pg 35 Para 2; this section states that “….the regeneration The statement must be considered Amend p 35 para 2 line 4: objectives for the Parkland Gateway will require the removal in the context of the overall of some existing trees,….”. The situation is not as ‘cut-and- Development Framework. The site ‘ The proposed development and dried’ as this bald statement would appear to suggest; presenting, as it seems to, the requirement to fell trees as already selected by Corby BC for achievement of the regeneration being a ‘fait accompli’. The Wildlife Trust has previously the development of the new objectives for the Parkland recommended that an ecological assessment approach be swimming pool will require the Gateway area will require the applied to trees ( or indeed any other vegetation cover ) that removal of some trees. The removal of some existing trees, but it is proposed to remove – in addition to whatever other Development Framework makes it this will be subject to further methods of appraisal have been or are to be applied – in order that any such decision can be a well-informed one and clear that the loss of trees should ecological assessment and the based on a fully-rounded set of criteria. where possible be minimised implementation of a woodland through sensitive layout and management plan and where design and valuable trees should possible, the removal of trees will
be retained and that further tree be minimised through sensitive
and ecological surveys will be layout and design. Whilst some required during preparation of tree removal may be necessary, detailed development proposals. there is the opportunity to enhance The removal of some trees will be and secure the retained woodland
acceptable in order to achieve through active woodland
regeneration objectives subject to management and to significantly
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 11
a woodland management plan and improve its conservation and replacement planting (p 42) social value’.
Pg 37; “Urban Park and Woodland”, point 3. The creation This will be addressed in the Amend p 37 point 3 and include and zoning of activity areas will need to be guided by the preparation of the Management reference in Management Plan ecological value and potential of preferred areas through Plan. Guidelines (p 62) detailed surveys and ecological assessments.
Pg 37; “Urban Park and Woodland”. In relation to our points Agreed Amend text p 37 made earlier, the Framework should also seek to deliver green linkages and buffering of the ancient woodlands and grasslands through tree planting and grassland enhancement.
Pg 39; Woodland and Grassland (Parkland) should also be Agreed Amend text p 39 recognised as a major “Land Use” within this section. Hazel and Thoroughsale Woods will be managed as a Local Nature Reserve and could provide best practice examples of woodland management for wildlife and people, for BAP delivery and for educational/health opportunities.
Pg 39 Para 5; Pg 40 Para 2; the future potential of Hazel and Agreed Amend text p 39 Para 5 and p 40 Thoroughsale Woods for education and training Para 2 opportunities, as well as for health benefits, should be recognised here. For example, the concept of Forest Schools is being trialled within Northamptonshire, and is being greeted with great enthusiasm by schools local to Lings Wood Local Nature Reserve in Northampton.
Pg 42 Para 2 and Para 3; Welcome the additions made to Agreed Add text to end of p 42 Para 2 this section with regard to the intention to remove trees, but would wish to reiterate comments made in relation to Pg 35 regarding importance of Para 2 above. Believe it is very important that a fully- ecologiocal surveys and informed approach, based on up-to-the-minute ecological evaluations during preparation of surveys and evaluations, must be adopted to the process of development proposals deciding which, if any, trees and other vegetation might require to be removed. This would not only be of benefit to biodiversity, since it would be approving works based on sound conservation science, but is also likely to help with public relations and communication efforts with local residents.
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 12
Pg 49 Para 4; suggest the addition of ‘and natural’ to the Agreed Amend text p 49 Para 4 following sentence, thus:- “the Development Framework promotes the creation of a high quality built and natural environment for all and seeks….”.
Pg 55 Para 7; “Woodland and Parkland”. Again, the creation Agreed. This will be covered in Amend text p 55 Para 7 and zoning of activity areas will need to be guided by the Management Plan current and future ecological potential of the preferred areas through detailed surveys and ecological assessments. Habitat creation for biodiversity gain should also be considered as an objective for remaining undeveloped areas.
Pg 55; “Design Principles”.A network of formal and informal This will be addressed in Modify Design principles p 55 bullit access routes will need to be provided within the park. Studies commissioned by English Nature show that local preparation of Woodland point 2 with addition of ‘where this communities welcome opportunities for access to more Management Plan. Objective is to does not compromise the existing informal open space and that “managed” parks can often be create a variety of spaces with wildlife interest’ less favoured. more formal recreational uses by Point 1. The impacts of lighting on species present within and boating lake and enhanced adjacent to the woodland will need to be assessed through the Sustainability Appraisal approach. habitats in woodland. Agree to Point 2. Although we would welcome public enjoyment and suggested text modification safety enhancements to the woodland, it will be important to ensure that any such proposals do not compromise the existing wildlife interest and instead seek to incorporate these within amenity design. Suggest following wording is added to the bullet point :- “where this does not compromise the existing wildlife interest”.
Pg 56; “Design Principles”. Add an additional point. Agreed Add new point under design Additional planting and management of grassland and woodland habitats that will enhance and buffer the existing principles p 56 woodland and create habitat linkages through the town.
Pg 57; “Sustainability”. This section should also consider Agreed Add new text under Sustainability ecological sustainability through the addition of the following p 57 relating to ecological point:- “design and future management should seek to ensure a robust future for wildlife. The protection and sustainability enhancement of Hazel and Thoroughsale Woods will be delivered through sensitive design and future management and through the creation of appropriate buffer areas and habitat linkages”.
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 13
Pg 62; “Woodland Management Plan”. The Wildlife Trust Support and continued welcomes the production of an appropriate management involvement in production of plan for Hazel and Thoroughsale Woods and would be pleased to be involved in the development of this document. management Plan is welcomed Recommend that document is produced as soon as possible in order that it can inform the Development Framework and guide its delivery from an early stage.
It is very important that the delivery and implementation of the Management Plan is supported through adequate and Agreed Add reference to need for sustainable funding as it has often been the case in other adequate and sustainable funding instances that support for the management of such areas of for woodland management (p 62) open space declines rapidly following initial enthusiasm. Case studies such as the Milton Keynes Parks Trust and
Peterborough Environment City Trust could be assessed in order to consider options for sustainable funding.
Pg 63; “Ecology”. Following on from the comments made Agreed Add text under Ecology p 63 above, this section of the Management Plan should, in addition, consider:
• Habitat linkages to other wildlife habitats within and beyond the town. • Buffering of Hazel and Thoroughsale Woods through additional woodland and grassland creation. • Potential restoration of ecologically- poor grassland habitats. • On-going monitoring of the biodiversity resource to
assess whether the management of the habitats is appropriate.
The Wildlife Trust would be pleased to continue to work Support welcomed together with Corby Borough Council and other stakeholders in the design, delivery and implementation of the Parkland Gateway initiative. Can therefore draw on a broad knowledge, experience and skill base in order to encourage the enjoyment and appreciation of biodiversity amongst local communities.
Offer additional help, and wildlife input and advice in relation to the emerging MKSM Growth Strategy schemes and other Offer of support noted overall incremental development pressures that are arising in the wider Corby Borough area.
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 1
STAKEHOLDER PRESENTATION AND WORKSHOP
^=éêÉëÉåí~íáçå=~åÇ=ïçêâëÜçé=ï~ë=ÜÉäÇ=çå=NS=cÉÄêì~êó=íç=éêçîáÇÉ=ÑìêíÜÉê= áåÑçêã~íáçå=çå=íÜÉ=aê~Ñí=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=~åÇ=íç=~ääçï=ëí~íìíçêó= ÅçåëìäíÉÉë=~åÇ=çêÖ~åáë~íáçåë=íç=ê~áëÉ=èìÉëíáçåëI=ëÉÉâ=Åä~êáÑáÅ~íáçå=~åÇ=éêçîáÇÉ= ÑÉÉÇÄ~ÅâK=fåîáí~íáçåë=ïÉêÉ=ëÉåí=íç=ëí~íìíçêó=ÅçåëìäíÉÉëI=çêÖ~åáë~íáçåë=~åÇ= çíÜÉê=âÉó=ëí~âÉÜçäÇÉêëK=^=Ñìää=äáëí=çÑ=íÜÉ=çêÖ~åáë~íáçåë=~åÇ=ëí~âÉÜçäÇÉêë= áåîáíÉÇ=íç=íÜÉ=éêÉëÉåí~íáçå=áë=Åçåí~áåÉÇ=áå=^ééÉåÇáñ=^K= = ^=íçí~ä=çÑ=PO=êÉéêÉëÉåí~íáîÉë=~ííÉåÇÉÇ=íÜÉ=éêÉëÉåí~íáçå=~åÇ=ïçêâëÜçéK=qÜÉ= çêÖ~åáë~íáçåë=áåîáíÉÇ=íç=~åÇ=êÉéêÉëÉåíÉÇ=~í=íÜÉ=ÉîÉåí=~êÉ=äáëíÉÇ=áå=q~ÄäÉ=OK=
Table 3: Statutory Consultees and organisations invited to and represented at the presentation and workshop (16 February 2005) = = Represented at presentation Organisation (16 February 2005) 1 English Partnerships Yes 2 Corby Borough Council Yes 3 BBC Radio Northampton No 4 CHOA Yes 5 Connexions Yes 6 Forestry Commission (Regional Office) No 7 EMDA Yes 8 Northamptonshire Police Yes 9 Northamptonshire County Council Yes 10 Forestry Commission No 11 Corby Welfare Rights No 12 Catalyst Corby Yes 13 Northamptonshire County Council Yes 14 Northampton County Council Registration Yes Service 15 Northampton County Council Yes Library Service 16 Job Centre Plus No 17 Northamptonshire Partnership Yes 18 Fortac Yes 19 Government Office East Midlands Yes 20 East Midlands Development Agency Yes 21 Volunteer Bureau Yes 22 Corby Citizens Advice Bureau No 23 English Nature No 24 Learning & Skills Council Yes 25 Constituency Office No 26 Rockingham Forest Trust No 27 Wildlife Trust No 28 Northamptonshire Chamber of Commerce No 29 Corby Borough Council Yes
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 2
== Represented at presentation Organisation (16 February 2005) 30 City Fax No 31 Northamptonshire County Council Highways Yes Services 32 Volunteer Bureau Yes 33 Yates Walker No 34 Northamptonshire Heartlands Primary Care No Trust 35 Corby Hackney Owners Association Yes = qÜÉ=éêáåÅáé~ä=áëëìÉë=ê~áëÉÇ=~í=íÜÉ=éêÉëÉåí~íáçå=ã~ó=ÄÉ=ëìãã~êáëÉÇ=~ë= ÑçääçïëW= = • qÜÉ=åÉÉÇ=íç=ÉåëìêÉ=íÜ~í=ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåí=ãÉÉíë=êÉèìáêÉãÉåíë=çÑ=íÜÉ= pìééäÉãÉåí~êó=mä~ååáåÖ=dìáÇ~åÅÉ=Úmä~ååáåÖ=çìí=`êáãÉ=áå= kçêíÜ~ãéíçåëÜáêÉÛ= == • kÉÉÇ=íç=ÅçåëáÇÉê=áãé~Åíë=çÑ=éêçéçëÉÇ=ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåíLÅäçëìêÉ=çÑ= dÉçêÖÉ=pí=çå=ïáÇÉê=~êÉ~=í~âáåÖ=áåíç=~ÅÅçìåí=ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåí=éêçéçë~äë= áå=êÉëí=çÑ=`çêÄóX= = • kÉÉÇ=íç=ÅçåëáÇÉê=áãé~Åíë=çÑ=éçíÉåíá~ä=êÉäçÅ~íáçå=çÑ=í~ñá=ê~åâë=~åÇ= ÅäçëìêÉ=çÑ=dÉçêÖÉ=pí=íç=í~ñáë=Ñçê=çéÉê~íçêë=~åÇ=ÅìëíçãÉêëX= = • j~å~ÖÉãÉåí=mä~å=ãìëí=ÅçîÉê=ïÜçäÉ=çÑ=qÜçêçìÖÜë~äÉ=~åÇ=e~òÉä= ïççÇ=ÅçãéäÉñ=~åÇ=ÅçåëáÇÉê=áëëìÉë=ëìÅÜ=~ë=éìÄäáÅ=ë~ÑÉíóI=~ÅÅÉëëI= ~ãÉåáíó=~åÇ=ÉÅçäçÖóK=cìêíÜÉê=Åä~êáÑáÅ~íáçå=åÉÉÇÉÇ=çå=Üçï=íç=ÇÉäáîÉê= ïççÇä~åÇ=ã~å~ÖÉãÉåíK=bñáëíáåÖ=ïçêâáåÖ=Öêçìé=ëÜçìäÇ=ÄÉ= ÉñíÉåÇÉÇ=íç=çíÜÉê=Öêçìéë=ïáíÜ=ëìëí~áå~ÄäÉ=áåíÉêÉëíë=ÉÖW=prpqo^kpX= = • cê~ãÉïçêâ=ëÜçìäÇ=~ÅÅçããçÇ~íÉ=éçíÉåíá~ä=Ñçê=ÑìíìêÉ=ÜçíÉä= ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåíK=
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 3 3 community consultation
INTRODUCTION qÜÉ=ÑçääçïáåÖ=ãÉíÜçÇë=çÑ=Åçåëìäí~íáçå=ïÉêÉ=ìëÉÇ=íç=áåÑçêã=êÉëáÇÉåíë=~Äçìí= íÜÉ=aê~Ñí=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=~åÇ=íç=Éå~ÄäÉ=êÉëáÇÉåíë=íç=ÅçããÉåí=çå= íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äëW=
^P=ÑçäÇÉÇ=Åçäçìê=äÉ~ÑäÉí=ëìãã~êáëáåÖ=íÜÉ=m~êâä~åÇ=d~íÉï~ó= aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=~åÇ=éêçîáÇáåÖ=Ñìää=ÇÉí~áäë=çÑ=íÜÉ= ÉñÜáÄáíáçå=îÉåìÉë=~åÇ=Üçï=ÅçããÉåíë=ÅçìäÇ=ÄÉ=ã~ÇÉK=fí=ï~ë= ÇÉäáîÉêÉÇ=íç=ÉîÉêó=ÜçìëÉÜçäÇ=áå=`çêÄó=áå=g~åì~êó=OMMRX=
fåÑçêã~íáçå=çå=íÜÉ=`çêÄó=_çêçìÖÜ=`çìåÅáä=ïÉÄ=ëáíÉX=
`çåí~Åí=ÇÉí~áäë=çÑ=íÜÉ=êÉëéçåëáÄäÉ=`çìåÅáä=çÑÑáÅÉê=áåÅäìÇáåÖ=éÜçåÉ= åìãÄÉêI=~ÇÇêÉëë=~åÇ=ÉJã~áä=~ÇÇêÉëëX=
`çéáÉë=çÑ=íÜÉ=aê~Ñí=píê~íÉÖáÅ=cê~ãÉïçêâ=~î~áä~ÄäÉ=íç=îáÉï=~åÇ= éìêÅÜ~ëÉ=~í=`çìåÅáä=lÑÑáÅÉëX=
~=éìÄäáÅ=ÉñÜáÄáíáçå=ÜÉäÇ=~í=íÜÉ=táääçïë=^êí=`ÉåíêÉ=Ñêçã=PN=g~åì~êó= íç=NO=cÉÄêì~êó=OMMRK=êÉéêÉëÉåí~íáîÉë=çÑ=`çêÄó=_çêçìÖÜ=`çìåÅáä=~åÇ= `~í~äóëí=`çêÄó=ïÉêÉ=~î~áä~ÄäÉ=íç=ÇáëÅìëë=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äë=~í=íÜÉ= ÉñÜáÄáíáçå=çå=p~íìêÇ~ó=R=cÉÄêì~êó=~åÇ=tÉÇåÉëÇ~ó=V=cÉÄêì~êóK= åìãÄÉê=çÑ=îÉåìÉë=~Åêçëë=kçêíÜ=pçäáÜìääK=
=
LEAFLET = qÜÉ=äÉ~ÑäÉí=Åçåí~áåÉÇ=~=Åçéó=çÑ=íÜÉ=cê~ãÉïçêâ=mä~å=~åÇ=ëìãã~êáëÉÇ=íÜÉ= éêçéçë~äëK=fí=~äëç=éêçîáÇÉÇ=ÑìêíÜÉê=áåÑçêã~íáçå=çåW= = • fãé~Åí=çÑ=éêçéçë~äë=çå=íÜÉ=ïççÇä~åÇ= • tççÇä~åÇ=ã~å~ÖÉãÉåí=mä~å= • `Ü~åÖÉë=íç=íê~åëéçêí=áåÅäìÇáåÖ=ÅäçëìêÉ=çÑ=dÉçêÖÉ=píêÉÉí=íç=ÖÉåÉê~ä= íê~ÑÑáÅX= • aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=ãáñ= = PUBLIC EXHIBITION= qÜÉ=éìÄäáÅ=ÉñÜáÄáíáçå=çÑ=íÜÉ=aê~Ñí=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=ï~ë=íÜÉ=éêáåÅáé~ä= ÉîÉåíK=qÜÉ=táääçïë=^êíë=`ÉåíêÉ=ï~ë=ëÉäÉÅíÉÇ=~ë=~=ëìáí~ÄäÉ=ÅÉåíê~ä=äçÅ~íáçå= ïáíÜ=ÖççÇ=éìÄäáÅ=~ÅÅÉëë=~í=ÉñíÉåÇÉÇ=íáãÉëK== = cÉÉÇÄ~Åâ=Ñçêãë=ïÉêÉ=~î~áä~ÄäÉ=Ñçê=~ííÉåÇÉÉë=íç=ÅçããÉåí=çå=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äëK== qÜáë=ëÉÅíáçå=çÑ=íÜÉ=êÉéçêí=ëìãã~êáëÉë=íÜÉ=ÅçããÉåíë=êÉÅÉáîÉÇK=K==
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 4
QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSES
^=íçí~ä=çÑ=SV=êÉëéçåëÉë=ïÉêÉ=êÉÅÉáîÉÇ=íç=íÜÉ=èìÉëíáçåå~áêÉK=qÜÉ=êÉëéçåëÉë=íç= íÜÉ=èìÉëíáçåë=~êÉ=ëìãã~êáëÉÇ=áå=íÜÉ=ÑçääçïáåÖ=í~ÄäÉK= = Table 4: Summary of questionnaire responses = nìÉëíáçå= píêçåÖäó= pìééçêí= kç=çéáåáçå= lééçëÉ= píêçåÖäó= kçí=ÅçãéäÉíÉÇ= ëìééçêí= çééçëÉ= = kç= B= kç= B= kç= B= kç= B= kç= B= kç= B= eçï=Çç=óçì=ÑÉÉä=~Äçìí=íÜÉ======ã~áå=éêçéçë~äë\= sáëáçå=Ñçê=m~êâä~åÇ= PO= QSB= OU= QNB= P= QB= N= OB= O= PB= P= QB= d~íÉï~ó= jáñ=çÑ=ìëÉë= OV= QOB= OV= QOB= Q= SB= O= PB= O= PB= P= QB= kÉï=íçïå=ëèì~êÉ=~åÇ= QN= SMB= NU= OSB= R= TB= M= M= O= PB= P= QB= éìÄäáÅ=ëé~ÅÉë= j~å~ÖÉãÉåí=~åÇ= PR= RNB= NU= OSB= S= VB= P= QB= Q= SB= P= QB= ÉåÜ~åÅÉãÉåí=çÑ=e~òÉä= tççÇ= ^äíÉê~íáçåë=íç=êç~Ç=åÉíïçêâ= PM= QPB= ON= PMB= V= NPB= N= OB= Q= SB= Q= SB= ~åÇ=ÅäçëìêÉ=çÑ=dÉçêÖÉ=pí= = nìÉëíáçå= píêçåÖäó= kç=çéáåáçå= lééçëÉL= kçí=ÅçãéäÉíÉÇ= ëìééçêíL= píêçåÖäó= pìééçêí= çééçëÉ= = kç= B= kç= B= kç= B= kç= B= eçï=Çç=óçì=ÑÉÉä=~Äçìí=íÜÉ======ã~áå=éêçéçë~äë\= sáëáçå=Ñçê=m~êâä~åÇ= SM= UTB= P= QB= P= RB= P= QB= d~íÉï~ó= jáñ=çÑ=ìëÉë= RU= UQB= Q= SB= Q= SB= P= QB= kÉï=íçïå=ëèì~êÉ=~åÇ= RV= USB= R= TB= O= PB= P= QB= éìÄäáÅ=ëé~ÅÉë= j~å~ÖÉãÉåí=~åÇ= RP= TTB= S= VB= T= NMB= P= QB= ÉåÜ~åÅÉãÉåí=çÑ=e~òÉä= tççÇ= ^äíÉê~íáçåë=íç=êç~Ç=åÉíïçêâ= RN= TPB= V= NPB= R= UB= Q= SB= ~åÇ=ÅäçëìêÉ=çÑ=dÉçêÖÉ=pí= = qÜÉ=ã~àçêáíó=çÑ=êÉëéçåÇÉåíë=íç=íÜÉ=èìÉëíáçåå~áêÉ=ëíêçåÖäó=ëìééçêíÉÇ=çê= ëìééçêíÉÇ=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äëI=áå=é~êíáÅìä~êI=íÜÉ=çîÉê~ää=îáëáçå=Ñçê=m~êâä~åÇ= d~íÉï~ó=EUTB=çÑ=èìÉëíáçåå~áêÉ=êÉëéçåëÉëFI=íÜÉ=åÉï=íçïå=ëèì~êÉ=~åÇ=éìÄäáÅ= ëé~ÅÉë=EUSB=çÑ=èìÉëíáçåå~áêÉ=êÉëéçåëÉëF=~åÇ=íÜÉ=ãáñ=çÑ=ìëÉë=EUQB=çÑ= èìÉëíáçåå~áêÉ=êÉëéçåëÉëFK= = ^=ä~êÖÉê=åìãÄÉê=çÑ=êÉëéçåÇÉåíë=çééçëÉÇ=çê=ëíêçåÖäó=çééçëÉÇ=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äë= Ñçê=íÜÉ=ã~å~ÖÉãÉåí=~åÇ=ÉåÜ~åÅÉãÉåí=çÑ=e~òÉä=tççÇ=ENMB=çÑ=èìÉëíáçåå~áêÉ= êÉëéçåëÉëF=~åÇ=íÜÉ=~äíÉê~íáçåë=íç=íÜÉ=êç~Ç=åÉíïçêâ=~åÇ=ÅäçëìêÉ=çÑ=dÉçêÖÉ= píêÉÉí=EUB=çÑ=èìÉëíáçåå~áêÉ=êÉëéçåëÉëF=íÜ~å=~åó=çÑ=íÜÉ=çíÜÉê=ÉäÉãÉåíë=çÑ=íÜÉ= aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâK=eçïÉîÉêI=íÜÉ=åìãÄÉê=çÑ=êÉëéçåÇÉåíë=çééçëáåÖ= íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äë=çå=íÜÉëÉ=ÖêçìåÇë=êÉéêÉëÉåíÉÇ=~=ãáåçêáíó=çÑ=íÜÉ=íçí~ä=åìãÄÉê=çÑ= êÉëéçåÇÉåíë=~åÇ=íÜÉ=ã~àçêáíó=çÑ=êÉëéçåÇÉåíë=ëíêçåÖäó=ëìééçêíÉÇ=çê= ëìééçêíÉÇ=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äë=Ñçê=íÜÉ=ã~å~ÖÉãÉåí=~åÇ=ÉåÜ~åÅÉãÉåí=çÑ=e~òÉä=
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 5
tççÇ=ETTB=çÑ=èìÉëíáçåå~áêÉ=êÉëéçåëÉëF=~åÇ=íÜÉ=~äíÉê~íáçåë=íç=íÜÉ=êç~Ç= åÉíïçêâ=~åÇ=ÅäçëìêÉ=çÑ=dÉçêÖÉ=píêÉÉí=ETPB=çÑ=èìÉëíáçåå~áêÉ=êÉëéçåëÉëFK= = ^=åìãÄÉê=çÑ=ïêáííÉå=ÅçããÉåíë=ïÉêÉ=~äëç=ã~ÇÉ=áå=íÜÉ=èìÉëíáçåå~áêÉ= êÉëéçåëÉëK=qÜÉëÉ=~êÉ=ëìãã~êáëÉÇ=áå=íÜÉ=ÑçääçïáåÖ=í~ÄäÉK= = Table 5: Written comments included in Questionnaire Responses = Nature of Response Number of Comment Proposed Modifications Responses to Development Framework Support for Vision 20 Comments noted No change Concern regarding timescale 4 The development of Parkland No change Gateway will be phased. A number of projects have been identified for potential early development Need for new bus station/coach park 3 Noted. Provision for buses No change and coaches to be considered elsewhere in town centre. Facilities for buses and coach drop down will be provided on George St Impact of multi-storey car park on 1 Noted. High quality design Design principles to include appearance of area promoted reference to need for good design and integration of car parks Possible weakening of Town Centre due 1 The Regeneration Framework No change to creation of two focal points seeks to create a number of different quarters with distinctive functions. Focal points will be complimentary and will strengthen role of town centre Use of civic hub by local groups at 1 Noted. To be considered in No change preferential rates operation/management of hub Unhappy about lack of plans/models 5 There are no detailed plans at No change and officials at exhibition this stage and the plan presents a framework for the preparation of detailed proposals. Plans/models will be provided in future consultation events. The exhibition was staffed at advertised times but arrangements will be reviewed for future events Need more ideas about how to make 2 The creation of a vibrant and Include reference p 39 to square active through provision of active town square is a key provision of leisure facilities entertainment for families and young objective. The Development for families and young people Framework allows for a range people of leisure facilities to be provided.
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 6
Nature of Response Number of Comment Proposed Modifications Responses to Development Framework Need for better lighting/security 3 Agreed. Reference is included Highlight requirements for in Development Framework good lighting and security to create safe environment Need for better public transport 1 Agreed. Facilities in George No change Street and closure of George Street to through traffic will improve services Need for consultation on detailed 1 Agreed. There will be Include reference in proposals consultation on the Section 8 Delivery & development of proposals for Implementation to future the Parkland Gateway consultation Concern about increase in population 2 Outside scope of Parkland No change and impact of rural setting- not Gateway Development necessary to secure improvements Framework. Corby is identified for planned growth in the Draft Sub-Regional Strategy Need for street signs/improved 1 Agreed. Reference is included No change maintenance in Development Framework and Design Guidelines Concern about traffic impacts 2 Development framework No change includes highway proposals to accommodate traffic impacts. Detailed measures will be developed in context of changing patterns of movement within town to ensure traffic impacts are satisfactorily addressed Need to enable use of woodland with 2 Noted. Proposals must be No change walkways, cycletracks and facilities for sensitive to ecological and children, restaurant, function room and environmental qualities of picnic areas woodland. More active uses will be confined to grassland and are around boating lake Need to build on community support for 2 Noted. The development of a No change theatre and develop new arts/cultural cultural focus for town is a key centre objective Need more idea on who will provide 2 The Development Framework No change retail services and careful selection of includes ancillary retail uses shops to improve quality/choice and cafes/restaurants. Main retail uses will be located within retail core to east of George Street. Parkland Gateway Proposals will improve quality and choice of facilities in particular for food and drink
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 7
Nature of Response Number of Comment Proposed Modifications Responses to Development Framework Parking inconvenient for elderly and 2 Noted. Provision for disabled Include reference p 47 disabled parking/drop off areas will be (under parking) and p 59 made in association with new (Creating an Inclusive development to ensure Environment) convenient access is available Need for car parking including night time 5 Agreed. This is addressed in No change use the Development Framework Support for pedestrianisation of George 1 Noted No change St Lack of covered shopping centre 4 Retail centre is outside area No change covered by Development Framework No more trees than absolutely 1 Agreed. This principle is set No change necessary should be removed with out in the Development management of woodland Framework (p 42) Need for cinema 1 The Development Framework No change allows for possible provision of cinema as part of development proposals. This will be subject to operator interest. Plans will not work unless whole of 1 Agreed. Corby BC and No change Corby improved Catalyst Corby are committed to regeneration of whole town. The Parkland Gateway development will serve as a catalyst for regeneration of rest of town centre More information required on 1 Noted. This will be addressed No change opportunities for new business at detailed stage development Library should be ground floor 1 Agreed. Library will meet No change accessible accessibility requirements (p 59). If trees are being lost to accommodate 1 Some tree loss will be No change development, why plant elsewhere? necessary to achieve regeneration objectives. However, loss of trees will be minimised through sensitive design and layout and subject to tree and ecological assessment. New planting is essential to ensure that there is no loss of biodiversity and to deliver biodiversity gain Too little too late- change rather than 1 Noted. The proposals will No change improvement deliver sustainable change and improvements which will benefit the town centre
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 8
Nature of Response Number of Comment Proposed Modifications Responses to Development Framework Don’t like mix of civic/cultural uses and 2 Mixed use development is No change residential with commercial promoted by Government guidance and planning policy to create more sustainable communities. The commercial uses will be compatible with cultural and residential uses and will not impact on amenity Unacceptable loss of woodland/trees 5 Noted. The loss of woodland Text to be amended to will be minimised through provide clarity about sensitive design and layout objective to minimise tree and the Management Plan will loss through sensitive provide benefits for woodland design and layout, to and users of woodland. undertake further tree and Replanting will be undertaken ecological assessments in in the woodland and preparation of development elsewhere in Parkland proposals and to undertake Gateway to compensate for replacement planting any loss of trees elsewhere in woodland (p 42) Concern about possible over- 1 An appropriate Management No change management of woodland plan will be developed in consultation with relevant bodies to ensure enhancement and protection of woodland Need to retain rural setting of boating 1 Agreed. No change lake- limit buildings to area shown in plan Need to promote sustainable 1 Agreed Additional text to be construction methods/materials included under Sustainability p 57 regarding sustainable construction methods/materials Any new facilities for play should be 1 Agreed Amend text p 45 to situated on grassland or in vicinity of emphasise that different boating lake not within woodland where treatments will be applied conservation and quiet enjoyment, to reflect character of exercise and amenity use of upgraded woodland path and cycleways should be priority Tree removal should be subject to pre- 1 Agreed Amend text p 42 survey of individual trees and any particular conservation value of each. Provision should be made for recovery of cut trunks and other associated ancient woodland resources for re-use within development of parkland
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 9
Nature of Response Number of Comment Proposed Modifications Responses to Development Framework Management Plan objectives should 1 Agreed Amend text p 62 include natural and cultural heritage conservation and interpretation plus encouragement and facilitation of health and amenity use. Need to confirm means of implementation/funding. Need to integrate remaining area of 1 Agreed Amend text to make clear Hazel Wood south of Westcott Way via that Management Plan will the Management Plan including relate to whole of designation of LNR Thoroughsale Wood and Hazel Wood (p 62)
= = OTHER RESPONSES
få=~ÇÇáíáçå=íç=íÜÉ=êÉëéçåëÉë=íç=íÜÉ=èìÉëíáçåå~áêÉI=íÜÉ=ÑçääçïáåÖ=ïêáííÉå= êÉëéçåëÉë=ïÉêÉ=êÉÅÉáîÉÇ=íç=íÜÉ=éìÄäáÅ=Åçåëìäí~íáçåK= = S=äÉííÉêë= NO=ÉJã~áäë= O=êÉëéçåëÉë=çå=íÜÉ=`çêÄó=ïÉÄ=ëáíÉ= = Letters
S=äÉííÉêë=ïÉêÉ=êÉÅÉáîÉÇI=çÑ=ïÜáÅÜ=íÜÉêÉ=ïÉêÉ=W= = O=äÉííÉêë=çÑ=çÄàÉÅíáçå=íç=íÜÉ=äçëë=çÑ=íêÉÉë=~åÇ=ÖêÉÉå=ëé~ÅÉ=~åÇ=áãé~Åí=çå= ïáäÇäáÑÉ=áå=e~òÉä=tççÇ= O=äÉííÉêë=çÑ=ëìééçêí= O=äÉííÉêë=ïÜáÅÜ=ÉñéêÉëëÉÇ=ëìééçêí=Ñçê=ÅÜ~åÖÉ=áå=íÜÉ=íçïå=ÅÉåíêÉ=Äìí= ÉñéêÉëëÉÇ=ÅçåÅÉêå=~Äçìí=íáãÉëÅ~äÉ=~åÇ=ÇçìÄíë=~Äçìí=ïÜÉíÜÉê=éêçéçë~äë= ïçìäÇ=ÄÉ=ÇÉäáîÉêÉÇK= = qÜÉ=O=äÉííÉêë=çÑ=ëìééçêí=ÜáÖÜäáÖÜíÉÇ=ëìééçêí=Ñçê=~=ÅáåÉã~=~åÇ=åÉï=íÜÉ~íêÉI= íÜÉ=åÉÉÇ=Ñçê=ëÉÅìêÉ=~åÇ=ÅçîÉêÉÇ=ÄáâÉ=é~êâáåÖI=~=åÉï=ë~ÑÉ=íêáã=íê~Åâ=áå=íÜÉ= ïççÇë=~åÇ=~å=~ÇÇáíáçå~ä=í~ñá=ê~åâL=Äìë=ëíçé=~í=`çííáåÖÜ~ã=oç~Ç=ÉåÇ=çÑ= dÉçêÖÉ=pí=íç=êÉÇìÅÉ=ìëÉ=çÑ=åÉï=éÉÇÉëíêá~å=~êÉ~K= =
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 10
E-Mails
NO=ÉJã~áäë=ïÉêÉ=êÉÅÉáîÉÇ=çÑ=ïÜáÅÜW= = T=ÉJã~áäë=ÉñéêÉëëÉÇ=ëìééçêí=Ñçê=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äë=áå=íÜÉ=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí= cê~ãÉïçêâ= O=ÉJã~áäë=ÉñéêÉëëÉÇ=ëíêçåÖ=çÄàÉÅíáçåë=íç=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äë=çå=íÜÉ=ÖêçìåÇë=çÑ=äçëë= çÑ=íêÉÉë=~åÇ=ìå~ÅÅÉéí~ÄäÉ=áãé~Åíë=çå=íÜÉ=ÉåîáêçåãÉåí=~åÇ=e~òÉä=tççÇK= N=ÉJã~áä=ÉñéêÉëëÉÇ=ÅçåÅÉêå=~Äçìí=íÜÉ=äçëë=çÑ=Éëí~ÄäáëÜÉÇ=ïççÇä~åÇ=Ñçê= ÅçëãÉíáÅ=éìêéçëÉë=Äìí=ëìééçêí=Ñçê=áãéêçîÉãÉåíë=íç=íÜÉ=íçïå=ÅÉåíêÉ= O=ÉJã~áäë=ÉñéêÉëëÉÇ=ëìééçêí=Ñçê=ÅÜ~åÖÉ=Äìí=ÇçìÄíÉÇ=íÜ~í=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äë= ïçìäÇ=ÄÉ=ÇÉäáîÉêÉÇK= = pìééçêí=ï~ë=ÉñéêÉëëÉÇ=Ñçê=íÜÉ=íçïå=ëèì~êÉI=áãéêçîÉãÉåíë=íç=e~òÉä=tççÇI= êÉëáÇÉåíá~ä=ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåíI=éÉÇÉëíêá~åáë~íáçå=çÑ=dÉçêÖÉ=píêÉÉí=~åÇ=é~êâáåÖ= éêçîáëáçåK= = tÜáäëí=ÉñéêÉëëáåÖ=ëìééçêí=Ñçê=íÜÉ=çîÉê~ää=éêçéçë~äëI=ÅçåÅÉêå=ï~ë=ê~áëÉÇ= ~Äçìí=íÜÉ=áãé~Åí=çÑ=íê~ÑÑáÅ=çå=íÜÉ=ïáÇÉê=ÜáÖÜï~ó=åÉíïçêâI=íÜÉ=ä~Åâ=çÑ= êÉÑÉêÉåÅÉ=íç=íÜÉ=éçíÉåíá~ä=Ñçê=í~ää==ÄìáäÇáåÖë=~åÇ=íÜÉ=åÉÉÇ=Ñçê=~=åÉï=Äìë= ëí~íáçåK==qÜÉ=åÉÉÇ=Ñçê=~=ÅçîÉêÉÇ=êÉí~áä=~êÉ~=ï~ë=~äëç=ê~áëÉÇK
Web Site
O=ãÉëë~ÖÉë=ïÉêÉ=éçëíÉÇ=çå=íÜÉ=`çêÄó=tÉÄW= = N=ãÉëë~ÖÉ=ÉñéêÉëëÉÇ=ÅçåÅÉêå=íÜ~í=êÉÇÉîÉäçéãÉåí=çÑ=íçïå=ÅÉåíêÉ=ïáää=í~âÉ= ~ï~ó=íÜÉ=ÅÜ~ê~ÅíÉê=çÑ=ÉñáëíáåÖ=ÅÉåíêÉ=~åÇ=ÜáÖÜäáÖÜíÉÇ=íÜÉ=åÉÉÇ=Ñçê= ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåí=íç=ÄÉ=~ÇîÉåíìêçìë=áå=íÉêãë=çÑ=ÜÉáÖÜí=~åÇ=ÇÉëáÖå=íç=ÅêÉ~íÉ=~= ëíêáâáåÖ=~åÇ=áÅçåáÅ=íçïå=ÅÉåíêÉ= = N=ãÉëë~ÖÉ=ÉñéêÉëëÉÇ=ÅçåÅÉêå=~Äçìí=íê~ÑÑáÅ=áãé~Åíë=~ëëçÅá~íÉÇ=ïáíÜ=íÜÉ= ÅäçëìêÉ=çÑ=dÉçêÖÉ=píêÉÉí=~åÇ=íÜÉ=åÉÉÇ=Ñçê=áãéêçîÉÇ=ÅêçëëáåÖë=çå=bäáò~ÄÉíÜ= píêÉÉíK=fí=~äëç=ê~áëÉÇ=ÅçåÅÉêå=~Äçìí=íÜÉ=áãé~Åí=çÑ=íÜÉ=ãìäíáJëíçêÉó=Å~ê=é~êâ=çå= íÜÉ=èì~äáíó=çÑ=íÜÉ=åÉï=ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåí=~åÇ=íÜÉ=éêÉÑÉêÉåÅÉ=Ñçê=íÜáë=íç=ÄÉ=ëáíÉÇ=áå= ~å=~äíÉêå~íáîÉ=äçÅ~íáçåK= = SUMMARY OF RESPONSES TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION
^=íçí~ä=çÑ=UV=ëÉé~ê~íÉ=êÉëéçåëÉë=ïÉêÉ=êÉÅÉáîÉÇ=áå=íÜÉ=Ñçêã=çÑ=ÅçãéäÉíÉÇ= èìÉëíáçåå~áêÉëI=äÉííÉêëI=ÉJã~áäë=~åÇ=ãÉëë~ÖÉë=çå=íÜÉ=`çìåÅáäÛë=ïÉÄ=ëáíÉK=qÜÉ= ã~àçêáíó=çÑ=êÉëéçåëÉë=ÉñéêÉëëÉÇ=ëìééçêí=Ñçê=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äë=ëÉí=çìí=áå=íÜÉ= m~êâä~åÇ=d~íÉï~ó=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=~åÇ=~=ÇÉëáêÉ=Ñçê=áãéêçîÉãÉåíë= íç=ÄÉ=ìåÇÉêí~âÉå=áå=íÜÉ=íçïå=ÅÉåíêÉK==TTB=çÑ=~ää=êÉëéçåëÉë=êÉÅÉáîÉÇ=íç=íÜÉ= Åçåëìäí~íáçå=ÉñéêÉëëÉÇ=ëìééçêí=Ñçê=íÜÉ=sáëáçåK==^å=~ÇÇáíáçå~ä=QB=çÑ=~ää= êÉëéçåëÉë=ëìééçêíÉÇ=íÜÉ=çîÉê~ää=sáëáçå=Äìí=ÉñéêÉëëÉÇ=ÅçåÅÉêå=~Äçìí=íÜÉ= íáãÉëÅ~äÉ=Ñçê=ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåí=~åÇ=ïÜÉíÜÉê=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äë=ïçìäÇ=ÄÉ=ÇÉäáîÉêÉÇK= = qÜÉ=éêáåÅáé~ä=ÅçåÅÉêå=ÉñéêÉëëÉÇ=áå=~ää=êÉëéçåëÉë=êÉä~íÉÇ=íç=íÜÉ=äçëë=çÑ=íêÉÉë= ~åÇ=áãé~Åí=çå=e~òÉä=tççÇK=^=íçí~ä=çÑ=NN=êÉëéçåëÉë=ENOB=çÑ=íÜÉ=íçí~ä=åìãÄÉê= çÑ=êÉëéçåëÉë=êÉÅÉáîÉÇF=ê~áëÉÇ=çÄàÉÅíáçå=íç=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äë=çå=íÜÉ=ÖêçìåÇë=çÑ=~å= ìå~ÅÅÉéí~ÄäÉ=äçëë=çÑ=íêÉÉë=~åÇ=áãé~Åí=çå=íÜÉ=ïççÇä~åÇ=~åÇ=ïáäÇäáÑÉK= eçïÉîÉêI=TTB=çÑ=~ää=êÉëéçåëÉë=íç=íÜÉ=nìÉëíáçåå~áêÉ=ëìééçêíÉÇ=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äë= Ñçê=ÉåÜ~åÅÉãÉåí=~åÇ=ã~å~ÖÉãÉåí=çÑ=íÜÉ=ïççÇä~åÇK=
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 11 5. summary
mìÄäáÅ=Åçåëìäí~íáçå=ÇìêáåÖ=éêÉé~ê~íáçå=çÑ=íÜÉ=oÉÖÉåÉê~íáçå=cê~ãÉïçêâ=~åÇ= ïáÇÉê=ëí~âÉÜçäÇÉê=áåîçäîÉãÉåí=Ü~ë=ÄÉÉå=áãéçêí~åí=áå=íÜÉ=éêÉé~ê~íáçå=çÑ= éêçéçë~äë=Ñçê=íÜÉ=m~êâä~åÇ=d~íÉï~óK=`çåëìäí~íáçå=Ü~ë=ÄÉÉå=ìåÇÉêí~âÉå=çå= íÜÉ=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=~åÇ=ïáää=ÅçåíáåìÉ=íÜêçìÖÜçìí=íÜÉ=éêçÅÉëë=çÑ= íÜÉ=éêÉé~ê~íáçå=çÑ=ÇÉí~áäÉÇ=ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåí=éêçéçë~äëK== = qÜÉ=Åçåëìäí~íáçå=éÉêáçÇ=ê~å=Ñêçã=ãáÇ=g~åì~êó=OMMR=íç=OU=cÉÄêì~êó=OMMRK= `çåëìäí~íáçå=ÅçãéêáëÉÇ=íÜÉ=ÑçääçïáåÖ=ÉäÉãÉåíëW= = áK iÉííÉêë=~åÇ=ÅçéáÉë=çÑ=íÜÉ=ÇçÅìãÉåí=ïÉêÉ=ëÉåí=íç=RP=ëí~íìíçêó= ÅçåëìäíÉÉë=~åÇ=çêÖ~åáë~íáçåëX= ááK ^=äÉ~ÑäÉí=Åçåí~áåáåÖ=~=ëìãã~êó=çÑ=íÜÉ=aê~Ñí=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí= cê~ãÉïçêâ=ï~ë=ÇÉäáîÉêÉÇ=íç=ÉîÉêó=ÜçìëÉÜçäÇ=áå=`çêÄóX= áááK ^=mìÄäáÅ=bñÜáÄáíáçå=çÑ=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äë=ï~ë=ÜÉäÇ=áå=íÜÉ=táääçïë=^êíë= `ÉåíêÉI=dÉçêÖÉ=píêÉÉí=Ñêçã=PN=g~åì~êóJ=NO=cÉÄêì~êó=OMMRX= áîK hÉó=ëí~âÉÜçäÇÉêë=~åÇ=êÉéêÉëÉåí~íáîÉë=çÑ=äçÅ~ä=çêÖ~åáë~íáçåë=ïÉêÉ= áåîáíÉÇ=íç=~ííÉåÇ=~=éêÉëÉåí~íáçå=~åÇ=ÑÉÉÇÄ~Åâ=çå=íÜÉ=aê~Ñí= aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=çå=NS=cÉÄêì~êó== = ^ää=íÜÉ=êÉëéçåëÉë=íç=Åçåëìäí~íáçå=Ü~îÉ=ÄÉÉå=~å~äóëÉÇ=~åÇ=~êÉ=éêÉëÉåíÉÇ=áå= íÜáë=êÉéçêíK=qÜÉëÉ=ÅçãéêáëÉW= = áK S=äÉííÉêë=Ñêçã=ëí~íìíçêó=ÅçåëìäíÉÉë=~åÇ=çíÜÉê=çêÖ~åáë~íáçåë= ááK SV=êÉíìêåÉÇ=èìÉëíáçåå~áêÉ=Ñçêãë= áááK S=äÉííÉêë=Ñêçã=ãÉãÄÉêë=çÑ=íÜÉ=éìÄäáÅ= áîK NO=ÉJã~áäë=Ñêçã=ãÉãÄÉêë=çÑ=íÜÉ=éìÄäáÅ== îK O=ãÉëë~ÖÉë=çå=íÜÉ=`çìåÅáäÛë=tÉÄ=páíÉ= = få=~ÇÇáíáçåI=~=åìãÄÉê=çÑ=éÉçéäÉ=~ííÉåÇÉÇ=íÜÉ=ÉñÜáÄáíáçå=~í=íÜÉ=táääçïë=^êí= `ÉåíêÉ=~åÇ=PO=êÉéêÉëÉåí~íáîÉë=Ñêçã=ëí~íìíçêó=ÄçÇáÉë=~åÇ=çíÜÉê=çêÖ~åáë~íáçåë= ~ííÉåÇÉÇ=~=éêÉëÉåí~íáçå=~åÇ=ïçêâëÜçé=çå=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äëK= = få=ëìãã~êóI=íÜÉ=ã~àçêáíó=çÑ=êÉëéçåëÉë=êÉÅÉáîÉÇ=ëìééçêí=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äëK= = STATUTORY BODIES AND ORGANISATIONS = kç=çÄàÉÅíáçåë=Ü~îÉ=ÄÉÉå=ê~áëÉÇ=Äó=ëí~íìíçêó=ÄçÇáÉë=çê=çêÖ~åáë~íáçåë=~äíÜçìÖÜ= ~=åìãÄÉê=çÑ=ëìÖÖÉëíÉÇ=~ãÉåÇãÉåíë=íç=íÜÉ=íÉñí=Ü~îÉ=ÄÉÉå=éìí=Ñçêï~êÇK=qÜÉ= éêçéçëÉÇ=~ãÉåÇãÉåíë=éêçîáÇÉ=ÜÉäéÑìä=Åä~êáÑáÅ~íáçå=~åÇ=áí=áë=êÉÅçããÉåÇÉÇ= íÜ~í=íÜÉëÉ=ÅÜ~åÖÉë=~êÉ=~ÇçéíÉÇK=qÜÉ=éêáåÅáé~ä=áëëìÉë=ê~áëÉÇ=êÉä~íÉ=íç=íÜÉ= áãé~Åí=çÑ=íÜÉ=ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåí=éêçéçë~äë=çå=íÜÉ=ïççÇä~åÇ=~åÇ=íÜÉ=áãéçêí~åÅÉ=çÑ= áãéäÉãÉåí~íáçå=çÑ=~å=~ééêçéêá~íÉ=j~å~ÖÉãÉåí=mä~åK==qÜÉ=êÉëéçåëÉë= ÜáÖÜäáÖÜí=íÜÉ=ëçÅá~äI=ÉÅçäçÖáÅ~ä=~åÇ=ÉåîáêçåãÉåí~ä=ÄÉåÉÑáíë=ïÜáÅÜ=ÅçìäÇ=ÄÉ= ~ÅÜáÉîÉÇ=íÜêçìÖÜ=ÉÑÑÉÅíáîÉ=ã~å~ÖÉãÉåí=çÑ=íÜÉ=ïççÇä~åÇK=== = =
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 12
PUBLIC CONSULTATION = TTB=çÑ=~ää=êÉëéçåëÉë=êÉÅÉáîÉÇ=áå=êÉëéçåëÉ=íç=íÜÉ=éìÄäáÅ=Åçåëìäí~íáçå= ëìééçêíÉÇ=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äë=Ñçê=íÜÉ=m~êâä~åÇ=d~íÉï~óK=^å=~ÇÇáíáçå~ä=QB= ëìééçêíÉÇ=íÜÉ=îáëáçå=Äìí=ÉñéêÉëëÉÇ=ÅçåÅÉêå=~Äçìí=ïÜÉíÜÉê=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äë= ïçìäÇ=ÄÉ=ÇÉäáîÉêÉÇK= = qÜÉ=éêáåÅáé~ä=ÅçåÅÉêå=ÉñéêÉëëÉÇ=áå=êÉëéçåëÉë=êÉÅÉáîÉÇ=Ñêçã=íÜÉ=éìÄäáÅ= êÉä~íÉÇ=íç=íÜÉ=äçëë=çÑ=íêÉÉë=~åÇ=áãé~Åí=çå=e~òÉä=tççÇK=^=íçí~ä=çÑ=NN=êÉëéçåëÉë= ENOB=çÑ=íÜÉ=íçí~ä=åìãÄÉê=çÑ=êÉëéçåëÉë=êÉÅÉáîÉÇF=ê~áëÉÇ=çÄàÉÅíáçå=íç=íÜÉ= éêçéçë~äë=çå=íÜÉ=ÖêçìåÇë=çÑ=~å=ìå~ÅÅÉéí~ÄäÉ=äçëë=çÑ=íêÉÉë=~åÇ=áãé~Åí=çå=íÜÉ= ïççÇä~åÇ=~åÇ=ïáäÇäáÑÉK=eçïÉîÉêI=TTB=çÑ=~ää=êÉëéçåëÉë=íç=íÜÉ=nìÉëíáçåå~áêÉ= ëìééçêíÉÇ=íÜÉ=éêçéçë~äë=Ñçê=ÉåÜ~åÅÉãÉåí=~åÇ=ã~å~ÖÉãÉåí=çÑ=íÜÉ=ïççÇä~åÇK= = qÜÉ=áãé~Åí=çÑ=íÜÉ=ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåí=éêçéçë~äë=çå=íÜÉ=ïççÇä~åÇ=~åÇ=íÜÉ=éçíÉåíá~ä= äçëë=çÑ=íêÉÉë=áë=ÅäÉ~êäó=íÜÉ=áëëìÉ=çÑ=ÖêÉ~íÉëí=ÅçåÅÉêåK==eçïÉîÉêI=åç=çÄàÉÅíáçå= Ü~ë=ÄÉÉå=ê~áëÉÇ=Äó=båÖäáëÜ=k~íìêÉI=íÜÉ=cçêÉëíêó=`çããáëëáçå=~åÇ=íÜÉ=táäÇäáÑÉ= qêìëíK=qÜÉëÉ=çêÖ~åáë~íáçåë=ëìééçêí=íÜÉ=çÄàÉÅíáîÉë=çÑ=íÜÉ=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí= cê~ãÉïçêâ=~åÇ=íÜÉ=ÉåÜ~åÅÉãÉåí=çÑ=íÜÉ=ïççÇä~åÇ=~åÇ=ÅçåëáÇÉê=íÜ~í=íÜÉ= éêÉé~ê~íáçå=~åÇ=áãéäÉãÉåí~íáçå=çÑ=~=tççÇä~åÇ=j~å~ÖÉãÉåí=mä~å=ïáää= ÉåëìêÉ=íÜ~í=íÜÉëÉ=çÄàÉÅíáîÉë=~êÉ=ãÉí=ïáíÜçìí=~ÇîÉêëÉ=áãé~Åí=çå=íÜÉ= ïççÇä~åÇK==qÜÉ=éêçéçëÉÇ=~ãÉåÇãÉåíë=íç=íÜÉ=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ= êÉÅçããÉåÇÉÇ=Äó=íÜÉëÉ=çêÖ~åáë~íáçåë=ïáää=éêçîáÇÉ=ÖêÉ~íÉê=Åä~êáÑáÅ~íáçå=çÑ=íÜÉ= ~ééêç~ÅÜ=íç=ÄÉ=~ÇçéíÉÇ=~åÇ=íÜÉ=áãéçêí~åÅÉ=çÑ=ÄáçÇáîÉêëáíó=~ë=~=âÉó=éêáåÅáéäÉ= çÑ=íÜÉ=aÉîÉäçéãÉåí=cê~ãÉïçêâ=~åÇ=íÜÉáê=ÅçããáíãÉåí=íç=íÜÉ=ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåí= ~åÇ=áãéäÉãÉåí~íáçå=çÑ=íÜÉ=tççÇä~åÇ=j~å~ÖÉãÉåí=mä~å=ïáää=ÉåëìêÉ=íÜ~í= íÜÉëÉ=áëëìÉë=~êÉ=~ééêçéêá~íÉäó=~ÇÇêÉëëÉÇ=áå=ÇÉîÉäçéãÉåí=éêçéçë~äëK= = =
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 13
= appendix a
STATUTORY CONSULTEES AND ORGANISATIONS INVITED TO AND/OR ATTENDING PRESENTATION AND WORKSHOP ON 16 FEBRUARY 2005
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 14
INVITEES AND ATTENDEES AT THE DRAFT DEVELOPMENT PLAN PRESENTATION AND WORKSHOP (16 FEBRUARY 2005) Mr/Ms/Dr Name Surname Title Company Attending Mr Roger Allanson Chairman Willow Arts Centre No Mr Nick Barton Tops Estate Yes Director of No Ms Louise Battye Finance Tresham Institute Mr Trevor Beattie English Partnerships No Mr Ray Beeby Corby Borough Council No Mr Harry Beer Assistant Editor BBC Radio Northampton No Mr Jeff Best Yes Ms Angela Billingham No Mr John Bolton CHOA Yes Mr Helen Bradshaw Team Manager Connexions Yes Mr Austin Brady Forestry Commission No Economic Northampton County Yes Mr James Cushing development Council Mr Martin Briggs EMDA No Mr Phil Bromhall Corby Borough Council No Force Estate Yes Mr Richard Brucknall Manager Northamptonshire Police Arts Strategy Northampton County No Ms Carrie Carruthers Manager Council Director for No Community Northampton County Mr Mark Charters Services Council Arts Development Yes Ms J Deveraux Officer Corby Borough Council Mr Peter Edge Forestry Commission No Ms Debbie Egan Manager Corby Welfare Rights No Mr Simon Evans Project Director Catalyst Corby Yes Ms Pat Fawcett Leader of Council Corby Borough Council Yes Brian Finnimore Mace Yes Business No Partnerships Northampton County Ms Sue Ford Manager Council Mr Ian Fordyce Job Centre Plus No Mr Des Glen House Manager Willow Arts Centre No East Midlands No Mr Brian Goddard Development Agency Mr Eddie Gordon Corby Borough Council Yes Head of Human Yes Resources & Customer Mr Peter Griggs Services Corby Borough Council Mr David Harley Corby Borough Council No
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 15
Mr/Ms/Dr Name Surname Title Company Attending Ms Sally Hogston Corby Borough Council Yes Mr Chris Hole College Sponsor Tresham Institute No Mr Andrew Howard Corby Borough Council No Operations Northamptonshire Yes Mr Terry Hughes Manager Partnership Mr Paul Hymers Head of Finance Corby Borough Council Yes Mr Ray Jackson Corby Borough Council No Mr Lyn Johnston Fortac Yes Customer No Services Manager Mr Bill Kelly Northern Area Northamptonshire Police Mr Bob Lane Chief Executive Catalyst Corby No Mr Richard Lay No Government Office East No Ms Rowena Limb Midlands East Midlands No Mr Ian Lodder Development Agency Northampton Yes Mr Jim Mackintosh County Council Mr Chris Mallender Chief Executive Corby Borough Council Yes Principal Library Northampton County Yes Mr Nick Matthews Officer Council Northampton County No Mr Peter McClaren Head of Strategy Council Ms Sian McDonald Principal Tresham Institute No Mr Peter McEwan Corby Borough Council No Development No Ms Margaret McGuire Worker Volunteer Bureau Chief No Superintendent (Area Commander for Mr Ian McNeill Northern Area) Northamptonshire Police Corby Citizens Advice No Ms Sally Morgan Manager Bureau Ms Laura Moss Managing Editor BBC Radio Northampton No Mr Ken Munro English Nature No Mr Paul Needle Corby Reporter Corby Borough Council No Head of Strategic Northampton County No Ms Alison Parry Management Council Mr Jonathan Perry Learning & Skills Council Yes Mr Ashley Pover The Rectory No Commercial No Ms Sarah Raper Director Catalyst Corby Mr Les Rolfe Constituency Office No Area Committed No Development Northampton County Ms Gerda Round Officer Council
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 16
Mr/Ms/Dr Name Surname Title Company Attending Government Office East No Ms Christine Saris Midlands Rockingham No Mr Alan Scott Davies Forest Trust Corporate Director - Operational Mr Duncan Sharkey Services Corby Borough Council No Senior Education Northampton County No Mr John Sleet Officer Council Mr Alan Smith Wildlife Trust No Northamptonshire No Mr Stephen Smith Chief Executive Chamber Mr Willie Smith Corby Borough Council No Mr Gerry Solomons Chairman City Fax No Senior Regeneration Mr Anthony Sowden Manager English Partnerships Yes Head of Leisure, Culture & Mr Chris Stephenson Community Corby Borough Council No Northamptonshire County Council Mrs Debbie Strong Highways Services No Manager Endeavour Mr John Stroud Training Volunteer Bureau Yes Mr Ashley Thorp Project Manager Catalyst Corby Yes Economic Development East Midlands Mr Richard Tobias Manager Development Agency Yes Assistant Chief Mr Roger Tunn Fire Officer No Mr David Walker Yates Walker No Head of Yes Registration Northampton County Mr Bruce Wall Service Council Community Yes Safety Support Mr Richard Wilson Officer Northamptonshire Police Northamptionshire No Associate Heartlands Primary Care Ms Sue Wilson Director Trust Northampton County No Ms Brenda Witted Springboard Council Head of Cultural Northampton County No Mr Eric Wright Services Council Corby Hackney Owners Yes Mr Lawson Walker Association Mr Mark Whall BBC Radio Northampton Yes
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE PARKLAND GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK CONSULTATION REPORT | 17
Mr/Ms/Dr Name Surname Title Company Attending Planning and Government Office East Yes Ms Gemma Newbery Transport Team Midlands Northampton County Yes Mr Ken Lay Highways Council Corby Hackney Owners Yes John Bolton Association PJ Floody Corby Borough Council Yes N Hayton Corby Borough Council Yes
EDAW PLC PLANNING, DESIGN AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WORLDWIDE