DOCSLIB.ORG

Endangered Species Technical Bulletin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

November/December 1980 Vol. V, No. II KIiill*WILI>LIFK SRRVK'K ENDANGERED SPECIES TECHNICAL BULLETIN Department of the Interior • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service • Endangered Species Program, Washington, D.C. 20240 Snail Darter Discovered at a New Location Michael Bender The tiny snail darter {Percina tanasi), It is "extremely unlikely," Dr. Etnier from industrial and sewage wastes, re- an Endangered species of perch known says, that the newly found snail darters sulting In frequent fish kills. In addition, historically from only a short section of are migrants from a Hiwassee River biologists do not yet know whether or not the Little Tennessee River, has been transplant site some 80 miles down- the experimental transplantations of found in a 10-15 mile stretch of South stream. The Chickamauga darters are snail darters Into the Hiwassee and Chickamauga Creek straddling the Ten- apparently a natural population, and Holston Rivers will be a long-term suc- nessee/Georgia border. have always existed either in the creek or cess. Dr. David Etnier, a University of Ten- in nearby streams. They went unde- The only officially designated Critical Jnessee Ichthyologist who initially dis- tected for a number of years despite an Habitat for the snail darter was covered the species, made the new find intensive search by TVA, which took destroyed when Congress exempted on November 1 of this year while seining samples from at least 134 localities on 35 TVA's Tellico Dam Project from the pro- a portion of the creek just inside the Ten- streams throughout the Tennessee Val- visions of the Endangered Species Act nessee border, together with graduate ley which were thought to contain possi- (see October 1979 Technical Bulletin); student Andy Haines. Several days later, ble darter habitat. Further surveys will be however, the Service will now be study- Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) biolo- conducted on Chickamauga and several ing Chickamauga Creek for suitability as gist Charles Saylor accompanied several other streams in the area. additional Critical Habitat. According to University of Georgia biologists to a site Unfortunately, the snail darter is not TVA spokesman Louis Gwin, the agency upstream and across the State line, yet out of danger. Chickamauga Creek has no plans for any future projects on where more darters were captured and has a long history of pollution problems the creek. released. Reliable population estimates I for South Chickamauga Creek cannot yet be made, but Saylor suggests a mini- mum of about 200. ABOUT THIS ISSUE Dear Readers, As you may have noticed, this issue of the BULLETIN is dated November- December 1980. The reason for this combined issue is twofold—(1) the BULLETIN is presently understaffed, making it difficult to come out with a timely finished product, and (2) November was a slow month for rule- making activities, which means there would have been little to report in a separate December issue. Our next is- sue will be January 1981, Vol. VI, No. 1. Have a happy and safe holiday season! Morey Norkin The tiny snail darter, which became the focus of national attention when its Acting Editor presence in the Little Tennessee River temporarily halted construction of the Tellico Dam, was recently discovered at a new location. is fully recovered it will be released in an area near the Mississippi River. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is paying $2,500 of the reward money, the remainder is from the National Wildlife Federation. Region 4. In the absence of any known dusky seaside sparrow (Ammospiza maritima nigrescens) females, all plans for a captive breeding program have been cancelled. Another survey for remaining birds will be conducted in 1981, but only one presumed male is currently known to be left in the wild. A cooperative agreement has been signed with the Santa Fe Community College at Gainesville, Florida, to provide captive care for the five males now being held by the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. Service and State of Louisiana per- sonnel have recently completed a co- Endangered Species Program re- bald eagle in late October in Pierce operative project involving develop- gional staffers have reported the follow- County, Wisconsin. The bird was treated ment of an alligator population model to ing activities for the month of October. for a wing fracture at the University of aid in reassessing the status of the alli- Region 3. A $3,000 reward is being of- Minnesota's Raptor Rehabilitation gator in Louisiana and possibly other fered for information leading to the ar- Center, St. Paul. According to Dr. Patrick parts of its range. Use of this method to rest and conviction of tiie person or Redig of the Center, the fracture will take provide more accurate population es- persons who shot and wounded a young six to eight weeks to heal. When the bird timates should facilitate further delisting of the species. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2, P.O. Box 1306, Albuquerque, Region 5. A draft recovery plan for the Washington, D.C. 20240 NM 87103 (505-766-2321): Jerry Virginia round-leaf birch (Betula uber) is Stegman, Acting Regional Director; being reviewed by the Regional Office. Robert F. Stephens, Assistant Regional Lynn A. Greenwalt, Director Region 6. In 1980, attempts were Director, Jack B. Woody, Endangered (202-343-4717) made to release 58 American peregrine Species Specialist. Ronald E. Lambertson falcons (Fa/co peregrinus anatum) Associate Director and Region 3, Federal BIdg., Fort Spelling, reared by the Peregrine Fund (Fort Col-, Endangered Species Program Manager Twin Cities, MN 55111 (612-725-3500); lins, Colorado) into the wild in fivej Harvey Nelson, Regional Director, (202-343-4646) western States. Problems with predators' Harold J. O'Connor Daniel H. Bumgarner, Assistant Regional Director, James M. Engel, En- at two sites resulted in 52 peregrines be- Deputy Associate Director ing released. It is believed that 43 birds (202-343-4646) dangered Species Specialist. John Spinks, Chief, Region 4, Richard B. Russell Federal survived to independence. Office of Endangered Species BIdg., 75 Spring St., S.W., Atlanta, GA An Illustrated Guide to Special Interest (703-235-2771) 30303 (404-221-3583): Kenneth E. Vascular Plarits of Wyoming has been Richard Parsons, Chief, Biack, Regional Director, Harold W. printed. Copies are available from the Federal Wildlife Permit Office Benson, Assistant Regional Director, Regional Office. (703-235-1937) Alex 8. Montgomery, Endangered Clark R. Bavin, Chief, Species Specialist. Division of Law Enforcement Region 5, Suite 700, One Gateway Center, (202-343-9242) Newton Corner, MA 02158 (617-965- 5100): Howard Larsen, Regional Direc- Hudsonia tor, Gordon T. Nightingale, Assistant i TECHNICAL BULLETIN STAFF Regional Director, Paul Nickerson, En- Morey Norkin, Acting Editor Protection dangered Species Specialist. (703-235-2407) Region 6, P.O. Box 25486, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225 (303-234- Fostered 2209); Don W. Minnich, Regional Direc- tor; Charles E. Lane, Assistant Regional Regional OfflcM By Local Director; Don Rodgers, Endangered Region 1, Suite 1692, Lloyd 500 BIdg., 500 Species Specialist. Cooperation N.E. Multnomah St., Portland, OR Alaska Area, 1101 E. Tudor Rd., 97232 (503-231-6118): R. Kahler Mar- Anchorage, AK 99503 (907-276-3800, Marshall P. Jones tinson, Regional Director, Edward B. ext. 495): Keith M. Schreiner, Area Chamberlain, Assistant Regional Direc- Director; Jon Nelson, Ass't Area Direc- tor, David B. Marshall, Endangered tor; Dan Benfield, Endangered Species A successful public meeting and the Species Specialist. Specialist. support of local community leaders con- tributed to the speedy adoption of a final U.S. Fish and Wildlife Regions rule listing mountain golden heather Region 1: California, Hawaii. Idaho. Nevada. Oregon, Washington, and Pacific Trust Territories. Region 2: Arizona, New {Hudsonia montana) as a Threatened Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. Region 3: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin. species and designated its Critical Region 4: Alabama. Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Ten- Habitat in North Carolina's Pisgah nessee, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. Region 5: Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia. Region R: National Forest (F.R. 10/20/80). Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. Alaska Area: Alaska. In a way, Hudsonia's problems seem The ENDANGERED SPECIES TECHNICAL BULLETIN is published monthly by the U.S. to symbolize a great irony in today's Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. natural resource conservation—an ever increasing crush of outdoor admirers Fish and Wildlife Service botanists, Nora Murdock and Ben Sanders, examine a population of Hudsonia montana. who threaten to smother fragile natural listed plants.) development of a management plan. areas with their love. Questions about possible closures of Hudsonia is one of many resource man- Thus the public support for Hud- areas were brought up at the meeting by agement problems the Forest Service sonia's listing is especially Important. It the North Carolina Bowhunters Asso- must address in attempting to strike a began with a letter from the Burke ciation and a local rock climbing group. balance between legitimate use and County Manager, Kenneth R. Thompson, This would be a Forest Service decision abuse of wilderness area. endorsing the proposal. Subsequently, which the Fish and Wildlife Service could Protecting Hudsonia may not always the County Board of Commissioners, not officially address, but it was pointed be easy, but consensus among affected after receiving a visit from Area Office out that Hudsonia conservation can likely agencies and Individuals is that it is staff to explain the effects of the pro- be achieved by trail rerouting and activity definitely worthwhile.
Recommended publications
  • C:\Fish\Eastern Sand Darter Sa.Wpd

    C:\Fish\Eastern Sand Darter Sa.Wpd

    EASTERN SAND DARTER STATUS ASSESSMENT Prepared by: David Grandmaison and Joseph Mayasich Natural Resources Research Institute University of Minnesota 5013 Miller Trunk Highway Duluth, MN 55811-1442 and David Etnier Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee 569 Dabney Hall Knoxville, TN 37996-1610 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 1 Federal Drive Fort Snelling, MN 55111 January 2004 NRRI Technical Report No. NRRI/TR-2003/40 DISCLAIMER This document is a compilation of biological data and a description of past, present, and likely future threats to the eastern sand darter, Ammocrypta pellucida (Agassiz). It does not represent a decision by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on whether this taxon should be designated as a candidate species for listing as threatened or endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act. That decision will be made by the Service after reviewing this document; other relevant biological and threat data not included herein; and all relevant laws, regulations, and policies. The result of the decision will be posted on the Service's Region 3 Web site (refer to: http://midwest.fws.gov/eco_serv/endangrd/lists/concern.html). If designated as a candidate species, the taxon will subsequently be added to the Service's candidate species list that is periodically published in the Federal Register and posted on the World Wide Web (refer to: http://endangered.fws.gov/wildlife.html). Even if the taxon does not warrant candidate status it should benefit from the conservation recommendations that are contained in this document. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS DISCLAIMER...................................................................
  • Lessons from the Tellico Dam Controversy

    Lessons from the Tellico Dam Controversy

    Volume 43 Issue 4 Fall 2003 Fall 2003 Public Goods Provision: Lessons from the Tellico Dam Controversy Louis P. Cain Brooks A. Kaiser Recommended Citation Louis P. Cain & Brooks A. Kaiser, Public Goods Provision: Lessons from the Tellico Dam Controversy, 43 Nat. Resources J. 979 (2003). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol43/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. LOUIS P. CAIN & BROOKS A. KAISER* Public Goods Provision: Lessons from the Tellico Dam Controversy ABSTRACT Although absent from the initial Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, evidence of economic considerationsfirst appeared in the 1978 amendments. The only controversial vote concerning the ESA was the one to exempt the Tellico Dam (1978). Although the dam was a local project with little expected net benefit, this article argues that broader economic considerations mattered. Working from public choice models for congressional voting decisions, a limited dependent variable regression analysis indicates the economic variables with the most explanatory power for this environmental decision are college education, poverty, the designation of critical habitat within a district, the number of endangered species in the state, dollars the state received due to earlier ESA funding, and the percentage of the district that is federal land. Comparisons with aggregated environmental votes in the same year highlight the intensity of economic considerations in the Tellico case.
  • Information on the NCWRC's Scientific Council of Fishes Rare

    Information on the NCWRC's Scientific Council of Fishes Rare

    A Summary of the 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes in North Carolina Submitted by Bryn H. Tracy North Carolina Division of Water Resources North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Raleigh, NC On behalf of the NCWRC’s Scientific Council of Fishes November 01, 2014 Bigeye Jumprock, Scartomyzon (Moxostoma) ariommum, State Threatened Photograph by Noel Burkhead and Robert Jenkins, courtesy of the Virginia Division of Game and Inland Fisheries and the Southeastern Fishes Council (http://www.sefishescouncil.org/). Table of Contents Page Introduction......................................................................................................................................... 3 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes In North Carolina ........... 4 Summaries from the 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes in North Carolina .......................................................................................................................... 12 Recent Activities of NCWRC’s Scientific Council of Fishes .................................................. 13 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part I, Ohio Lamprey .............................................. 14 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part II, “Atlantic” Highfin Carpsucker ...................... 17 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part III, Tennessee Darter ...................................... 20 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part
  • Recovery Plan for Liatris Helleri Heller’S Blazing Star

    Recovery Plan for Liatris Helleri Heller’S Blazing Star

    Recovery Plan for Liatris helleri Heller’s Blazing Star U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia RECOVERY PLAN for Liatris helleri (Heller’s Blazing Star) Original Approved: May 1, 1989 Original Prepared by: Nora Murdock and Robert D. Sutter FIRST REVISION Prepared by Nora Murdock Asheville Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Asheville, North Carolina for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Approved: Regional Director, U S Fish’and Wildlife Service Date:______ Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover andlor protect listed species. Plans published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) are sometimes prepared with the assistance ofrecovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and other affected and interested parties. Plans are reviewed by the public and submitted to additional peer review before they are adopted by the Service. Objectives of the plan will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not obligate other parties to undertake specific tasks and may not represent the views or the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in developing the plan, other than the Service. Recovery plans represent the official position ofthe Service only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. By approving this recovery plan, the Regional Director certifies that the data used in its development represent the best scientific and commercial information available at the time it was written.
  • Maine's Endangered and Threatened Plants

    Maine's Endangered and Threatened Plants

    University of Southern Maine USM Digital Commons Maine Collection 1990 Maine's Endangered and Threatened Plants Maine State Planning Office Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/me_collection Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Botany Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Forest Biology Commons, Forest Management Commons, Other Forestry and Forest Sciences Commons, Plant Biology Commons, and the Weed Science Commons Recommended Citation Maine State Planning Office, "Maine's Endangered and Threatened Plants" (1990). Maine Collection. 49. https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/me_collection/49 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by USM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine Collection by an authorized administrator of USM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BACKGROUND and PURPOSE In an effort to encourage the protection of native Maine plants that are naturally reduced or low in number, the State Planning Office has compiled a list of endangered and threatened plants. Of Maine's approximately 1500 native vascular plant species, 155, or about 10%, are included on the Official List of Maine's Plants that are Endangered or Threatened. Of the species on the list, three are also listed at the federal level. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. has des·ignated the Furbish's Lousewort (Pedicularis furbishiae) and Small Whorled Pogonia (lsotria medeoloides) as Endangered species and the Prairie White-fringed Orchid (Platanthera leucophaea) as Threatened. Listing rare plants of a particular state or region is a process rather than an isolated and finite event.
  • YELLOW NAILWORT Scientific Name: Paronychia Virginica

    YELLOW NAILWORT Scientific Name: Paronychia Virginica

    Common Name: YELLOW NAILWORT Scientific Name: Paronychia virginica Sprengel Other Commonly Used Names: Virginia whitlow-wort, Appalachian nailwort Previously Used Scientific Names: Paronychia dichotoma (Linnaeus) Nuttall Family: Caryophyllaceae (pink) Rarity Ranks: G4/S1 State Legal Status: Endangered Federal Legal Status: none Federal Wetland Status: none Description: Perennial, evergreen herb with wiry, sprawling stems up to 18 inches (45 cm) long, branching from a woody crown. Leaves up to 1¼ inches (3 cm) long, needle-like, sharply pointed, leathery, bluish-green, opposite, evergreen. Flower clusters at the ends of branches. Flowers very small, with 5 yellow sepals less than inch (3 mm) long, each sepal holds a 1 stamen and is tipped with a sharp, triangular spine; there are no petals. Fruit about /16 inch (2 mm) long, oval. Similar Species: There are several other nailwort species in Georgia; most have oval or rounded leaves and pointed, but not spiny, sepals. Yellow nailwort is the only nailwort species in Georgia with both needle-like leaves and spine-tipped sepals. Related Rare Species: Silvery nailwort (Paronychia argyrocoma, Special Concern) occurs on sandstone cliffs and rocky mountaintops in northern Georgia; it has narrow leaves about 1 inch long, covered with silky hairs; its sepals are brownish-green with white edges and white, pointed tips. Pineland nailwort (P. patula) and Rugel’s nailwort (P. rugellii), both Special Concern in Georgia, occur in longleaf pine-turkey oak sandhills in southwest Georgia; both have oval to lance-shaped leaves and pointed (though not spine-tipped) sepals. Habitat: Shallow, rocky soil over magnesium-rich, ultramafic rock. Life History: Yellow nailwort is an evergreen, perennial herb with bisexual flowers that produce nectar from the base of the flower.
  • Underwater Observation and Habitat Utilization of Three Rare Darters

    Underwater Observation and Habitat Utilization of Three Rare Darters

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2010 Underwater observation and habitat utilization of three rare darters (Etheostoma cinereum, Percina burtoni, and Percina williamsi) in the Little River, Blount County, Tennessee Robert Trenton Jett University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Jett, Robert Trenton, "Underwater observation and habitat utilization of three rare darters (Etheostoma cinereum, Percina burtoni, and Percina williamsi) in the Little River, Blount County, Tennessee. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2010. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/636 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Robert Trenton Jett entitled "Underwater observation and habitat utilization of three rare darters (Etheostoma cinereum, Percina burtoni, and Percina williamsi) in the Little River, Blount County, Tennessee." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Wildlife and Fisheries Science. James L. Wilson, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: David A. Etnier, Jason G.
  • Threatened and Endangered Species List

    Threatened and Endangered Species List

    Effective April 15, 2009 - List is subject to revision For a complete list of Tennessee's Rare and Endangered Species, visit the Natural Areas website at http://tennessee.gov/environment/na/ Aquatic and Semi-aquatic Plants and Aquatic Animals with Protected Status State Federal Type Class Order Scientific Name Common Name Status Status Habit Amphibian Amphibia Anura Gyrinophilus gulolineatus Berry Cave Salamander T Amphibian Amphibia Anura Gyrinophilus palleucus Tennessee Cave Salamander T Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus bouchardi Big South Fork Crayfish E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus cymatilis A Crayfish E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus deweesae Valley Flame Crayfish E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus extraneus Chickamauga Crayfish T Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus obeyensis Obey Crayfish T Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus pristinus A Crayfish E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Cambarus williami "Brawley's Fork Crayfish" E Crustacean Malacostraca Decapoda Fallicambarus hortoni Hatchie Burrowing Crayfish E Crustacean Malocostraca Decapoda Orconectes incomptus Tennessee Cave Crayfish E Crustacean Malocostraca Decapoda Orconectes shoupi Nashville Crayfish E LE Crustacean Malocostraca Decapoda Orconectes wrighti A Crayfish E Fern and Fern Ally Filicopsida Polypodiales Dryopteris carthusiana Spinulose Shield Fern T Bogs Fern and Fern Ally Filicopsida Polypodiales Dryopteris cristata Crested Shield-Fern T FACW, OBL, Bogs Fern and Fern Ally Filicopsida Polypodiales Trichomanes boschianum
  • Spotted Darter Status Assessment

    Spotted Darter Status Assessment

    SPOTTED DARTER STATUS ASSESSMENT Prepared by: Joseph M. Mayasich and David Grandmaison Natural Resources Research Institute University of Minnesota 5013 Miller Trunk Highway Duluth, MN 55811-1442 and David Etnier Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee 569 Dabney Hall Knoxville, TN 37996-1610 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 3 1 Federal Drive Fort Snelling, MN 55111 March 2004 NRRI Technical Report No. NRRI/TR-2004-02 DISCLAIMER This document is a compilation of biological data and a description of past, present, and likely future threats to the spotted darter, Etheostoma maculatum (Kirtland). It does not represent a decision by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on whether this taxon should be designated as a candidate species for listing as threatened or endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act. That decision will be made by the Service after reviewing this document; other relevant biological and threat data not included herein; and all relevant laws, regulations, and policies. The result of the decision will be posted on the Service's Region 3 Web site (refer to: http://midwest.fws.gov/eco_serv/endangrd/lists/concern.html). If designated as a candidate species, the taxon will subsequently be added to the Service's candidate species list that is periodically published in the Federal Register and posted on the World Wide Web (refer to: http://endangered.fws.gov/wildlife.html). Even if the taxon does not warrant candidate status it should benefit from the conservation recommendations that are contained in this document. i TABLE OF CONTENTS DISCLAIMER............................................................................................................................... ii NARRATIVE ................................................................................................................................1 SYSTEMATICS...............................................................................................................
  • Acadian-Appalachian Alpine Tundra

    Acadian-Appalachian Alpine Tundra

    Acadian-Appalachian Alpine Tundra Macrogroup: Alpine yourStateNatural Heritage Ecologist for more information about this habitat. This is modeledmap a distributiononbased current and is data nota substitute for field inventory. based Contact © Josh Royte (The Nature Conservancy, Maine) Description: A sparsely vegetated system near or above treeline in the Northern Appalachian Mountains, dominated by lichens, dwarf-shrubland, and sedges. At the highest elevations, the dominant plants are dwarf heaths such as alpine bilberry and cushion-plants such as diapensia. Bigelow’s sedge is characteristic. Wetland depressions, such as small alpine bogs and rare sloping fens, may be found within the surrounding upland matrix. In the lower subalpine zone, deciduous shrubs such as nannyberry provide cover in somewhat protected areas; dwarf heaths including crowberry, Labrador tea, sheep laurel, and lowbush blueberry, are typical. Nearer treeline, spruce and fir that State Distribution: ME, NH, NY, VT have become progressively more stunted as exposure increases may form nearly impenetrable krummholz. Total Habitat Acreage: 8,185 Ecological Setting and Natural Processes: Percent Conserved: 98.1% High winds, snow and ice, cloud-cover fog, and intense State State GAP 1&2 GAP 3 Unsecured summer sun exposure are common and control ecosystem State Habitat % Acreage (acres) (acres) (acres) dynamics. Found mostly above 4000' in the northern part of NH 51% 4,160 4,126 0 34 our region, alpine tundra may also occur in small patches on ME 44% 3,624 2,510 1,082 33 lower ridgelines and summits and at lower elevations near the Atlantic coast. NY 3% 285 194 0 91 VT 1% 115 115 0 0 Similar Habitat Types: Acadian-Appalachian Montane Spruce-Fir-Hardwood Forests typically occur downslope.
  • Pelagic Larval Duration Links Life History Traits and Species Persistence in Darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae)

    Pelagic Larval Duration Links Life History Traits and Species Persistence in Darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae)

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2013 Pelagic larval duration links life history traits and species persistence in Darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae) Morgan Jessica Douglas [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Douglas, Morgan Jessica, "Pelagic larval duration links life history traits and species persistence in Darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae). " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2013. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2410 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Morgan Jessica Douglas entitled "Pelagic larval duration links life history traits and species persistence in Darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae)." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Christopher D. Hulsey, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Alison Boyer, James Fordyce Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Pel agic larval duration links life history traits and species persistence in Darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae) A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Morgan Jessica Douglas August 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Jen Schweitzer, Joe Bailey, and Phillip Hollingsworth provided useful comments and encouragement.
  • 9The Snail Darter and the Dam最終稿.Indd

    9The Snail Darter and the Dam最終稿.Indd

    書 評 BOOK REVIEW The Snail Darter and the Dam （スネイル・ダーターとダム） Reviewed by Kazuto Oshio* and Joseph DiMento** BOOK REVIEWED: Zygmunt J. B. Plater. The Snail Darter and the Dam: How Pork-Barrel Politics Endangered a Little Fish and Killed a River. New Haven: Yale UP, 2013. When Zygmunt Plater, the author of the book under review, fi nished his job as petitioner and counsel for plaintiff citizens in the Tellico Dam case from 1974 to 1980, he looked back to his legal involvement and wrote an article in 1982. At the end of this piece he concluded: “Tellico refl ected in microcosm an amazing array of substantive issues, philosophical quandaries, human dramas, and American political artifacts” and the “Tellico case deserves a much more probing and extensive analysis than that contained in this sketch” (“Refl ected in a River” 787). Since then, he has chaired the State of Alaska Oil Spill Commission’s Legal Research Task Force, been lead author of an environmental law casebook, and has participated in numerous citizen environmental initiatives. And now, after three decades, the professor of law and director of the Land & Environmental Law Program at Boston College Law School has published The Snail Darter and the Dam: How Pork-Barrel Politics Endangered a Little Fish and Killed a River from Yale University Press. * 小塩 和人 Professor, School of Foreign Studies, Sophia University, Tokyo, Japan. ** Professor, School of Law, University of California, Irvine, U.S.A. 113 BOOK REVIEW According to Edward O. Wilson of Harvard University, this case is “the Thermopylae in the history of America’s conservation movement.” Indeed, a national poll of environmental law professors on the most important American environmental protection court decisions has ranked it the number one case (Plater, “Environmental Law” 424).