DOCSLIB.ORG

Lessons Learned from Eagle Lake Rainbow Trout

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lessons Learned from Eagle Lake Rainbow Trout Long-term captive breeding does not necessarily prevent reestablishment: lessons learned from Eagle Lake rainbow trout Gerard Carmona-Catot, Peter B. Moyle & Rachel E. Simmons Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries ISSN 0960-3166 Rev Fish Biol Fisheries DOI 10.1007/s11160-011-9230- x 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your work, please use the accepted author’s version for posting to your own website or your institution’s repository. You may further deposit the accepted author’s version on a funder’s repository at a funder’s request, provided it is not made publicly available until 12 months after publication. 1 23 Author's personal copy Rev Fish Biol Fisheries DOI 10.1007/s11160-011-9230-x RESEARCH PAPER Long-term captive breeding does not necessarily prevent reestablishment: lessons learned from Eagle Lake rainbow trout Gerard Carmona-Catot • Peter B. Moyle • Rachel E. Simmons Received: 7 March 2011 / Accepted: 18 July 2011 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract Captive breeding of animals is often cited recovering as habitat. With the exception of an as an important tool in conservation, especially for abundant alien brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) fishes, but there are few reports of long-term population in Pine Creek, the habitat factors that led (\50 years) success of captive breeding programs, to the presumed near-extinction of Eagle Lake rainbow even in salmonid fishes. Here we describe the captive trout in the early twentieth century have been amelio- breeding program for Eagle Lake rainbow trout, rated, although the final stages of reestablishment Oncorhynchus mykiss aquilarum, which is endemic (eradication of brook trout, unequivocal demonstration to the Eagle Lake watershed of northeastern Califor- of successful spawning migration) have still not been nia. The population in Eagle Lake has been dependent completed. The Eagle Lake rainbow trout story shows on captive breeding for more than 60 years and that long-term captive breeding of migratory salmonid supports a trophy fishery in the lake. Nevertheless, fishes does not necessarily prevent reestablishment of the basic life history, ecological, and genetic traits of wild populations, provided effort is made to counter the subspecies still seem to be mostly intact. Although the effects of hatchery selection and that natural management has apparently minimized negative habitats are restored for reintroduction. Long-term effects of hatchery rearing, reestablishing a wild success, however, ultimately depends upon eliminat- population would ensure maintenance of its distinctive ing hatchery influences on wild-spawning populations. life history and its value for future use as a hatchery Extinction of Eagle Lake rainbow trout as a wild fish. An important factor that makes reestablishment species becomes increasingly likely if we fail to act possible is that the habitat in Eagle Lake is still intact boldly to protect it and the Eagle Lake watershed. and that Pine Creek, its major spawning stream, is Keywords Salmonidae Á Captive breeding Á G. Carmona-Catot (&) Á P. B. Moyle Hatchery effects Á Species invasions Á Endangered Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, species Á Conservation Á Eagle Lake University of California, Davis, Davis 95616, CA, USA e-mail: [email protected] G. Carmona-Catot Institute of Aquatic Ecology, University of Girona, Introduction 17071 Girona, Catalonia, Spain Captive breeding of animals is often cited as an R. E. Simmons Department of Animal Science, Genomic Variation Lab, important tool in conservation (Soule´ et al. 1986), University of California, Davis, Davis 95616, CA, USA especially for fish (Phillippart 1995). In some cases, it 123 Author's personal copy Rev Fish Biol Fisheries is the final resort for the species, when the last An unusual opportunity to see if a salmonid individuals are taken into captivity, as has happened population long maintained by captive breeding can with California condor (Gymnogyps californianus), revert to a wild, self-sustaining state is found in Eagle black-footed ferret (Mustela nigripes), Arabian oryx Lake rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss aquilarum). (Oryx leucoryx), European bison (Bison bonasus), and This trout is endemic to a single California watershed Owens pupfish (Cyprinodon radiosus) (Miller and but is now in widespread use in the western USA as a Pister 1971; Kleiman 1989; Snyder and Snyder 2000; hatchery fish. It has been reared in captivity for the first Perzanowski and Olech 2007; Belant et al. 2011). Most year or more of life for more than 60 years and is captive breeding programs, however, are fairly recent stocked annually into its native Eagle Lake, California, in origin and have little long-term experience with to support a trophy fishery (Moyle 2002). The stocked reestablishing wild populations. A general goal of fish, once mature, are captured, spawned, and returned captive breeding is to re-establish species in the wild to Eagle Lake. Some of their progeny are used as brood once suitable habitat is available, although this is not stock for part of the hatchery program. In this respect always possible (Snyder et al. 1996). Major concerns the captive breeding program for Eagle Lake rainbow include loss of fitness for survival in the wild during trout (ELRT) has characteristics of both a supplemen- captivity, through loss of genetic diversity, selection tation hatchery program and a put-and-grow program. for traits that improve survival in captivity but are While the hatchery program probably saved ELRT detrimental in the wild, and loss of learned behaviors from extinction, its principal purpose has been to essential for survival in the wild (Busack and Currens maintain the sport fishery in Eagle Lake and in other 1995; Araki et al. 2007, 2008). water bodies in California. Access of ELRT to their Many hatchery programs for fishes of the family major former spawning tributary (Pine Creek) has been Salmonidae (salmon, trout, charrs, etc.) are arguably completely blocked to allow for easy capture of mature captive breeding on a large scale, although they are fish. Moyle et al. (2008) suggested that the ELRT mostly designed to supplement existing wild popula- should be listed as a threatened species because of its tions or to support fisheries directly (Hilborn 1992; complete dependence on hatchery rearing for survival. Busack and Currens 1995). Fish used for the latter In this paper, we (1) describe the distinctive nature purpose can become completely domesticated (Moyle of Eagle Lake and its watershed, (2) review the 1969; Huntingford 2004); they are raised to be caught biology, history, and recent studies of ELRT, and (3) shortly after release (put-and-take fishery) or are present new information on ELRT life history and released into fairly benign conditions, such as ponds genetics. We then use this information to answer the or reservoirs, with no expectation of natural reproduc- following questions: tion (put-and-grow fishery). Fish from supplementa- • Can a self-sustaining population of ELRT be re- tion hatcheries, however, are expected to survive in the established in its native habitats after nearly wild although mortality rates once released are usually 60 years of captive breeding? extremely high. Nevertheless, supplementation pro- • If so, what changes in management of ELRT are grams have shown considerable success in maintain- required in order to re-establish a self-sustaining ing fisheries but their long-term prospects have been population in the Eagle Lake watershed? questioned (Fraser 2008; Kostow 2008). One reason for concern is loss of fitness for survival in the wild, Finally, we discuss insights gained from this study which in steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) can be in the use of captive breeding for restoration of native significant in 1–2 generations (Araki et al. 2007, 2008, fish. 2009). Fraser (2008) points out that there is little evidence that salmonids with a long hatchery history can establish self-sustaining wild populations. Most of Eagle Lake and its watershed the evidence is equivocal or anecdotal. However, Chilcote et al. (2011) show that wild populations of Eagle Lake (40.6 N, 120.7 W) is the second largest three species of anadromous salmonids have greatly natural lake (24 km long by 3–4 km wide) entirely reduced ability to be self-sustaining when fish of contained in California, with a surface area of hatchery origin are also present. ca. 8,900 ha (Fig. 1). It is situated in northeastern 123 Author's personal copy Rev Fish Biol Fisheries Fig. 1 Eagle Lake basin, showing the location of Pine Creek, the principal spawning tributary of Eagle Lake rainbow trout, and of Bogard Spring Creek, a small tributary at the lower end of the permanent reaches of Pine Creek, that is used for experimental spawning and rearing. Stream sections shown by a dashed line are usually dry in summer. The uppermost ca. 5 km of Pine Creek, which are highly seasonal in flow, are not shown California at an elevation of about 1,555 m (lake Table 1 Species, year and fish stocked in Eagle Lake since surface elevation varies with inflow). This endorheic 1924 (King and Weidlein, unpublished data, 1976; Purdy 1988; (terminal) lake consists of three basins, two of them Pustejovsky 2007) averaging 5–6 m deep, the third averaging 10–20 m Species Year No of fish with a maximum depth of about 23 m. The shallow stocked basins are similar in their limnology and water Coregonus clupeaformis 1879 225,000 temperatures sometimes exceed 21°C in the summer, Ameierus nebulosus 1879 – although the deep basin stratifies, providing a cool Micropterus salmoides 1901–1902/1930 1047 water refuge for trout.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Tahoe Fish Species
    Description: o The Lohonton cutfhroot trout (LCT) is o member of the Solmonidqe {trout ond solmon) fomily, ond is thought to be omong the most endongered western solmonids. o The Lohonton cufihroot wos listed os endongered in 1970 ond reclossified os threotened in 1975. Dork olive bdcks ond reddish to yellow sides frequently chorocterize the LCT found in streoms. Steom dwellers reoch l0 inches in length ond only weigh obout I lb. Their life spon is less thon 5 yeors. ln streoms they ore opportunistic feeders, with diets consisting of drift orgonisms, typicolly terrestriol ond oquotic insects. The sides of loke-dwelling LCT ore often silvery. A brood, pinkish stripe moy be present. Historicolly loke dwellers reoched up to 50 inches in length ond weigh up to 40 pounds. Their life spon is 5-14yeors. ln lokes, smoll Lohontons feed on insects ond zooplonkton while lorger Lohonions feed on other fish. Body spots ore the diognostic chorocter thot distinguishes the Lohonion subspecies from the .l00 Poiute cutthroot. LCT typicolly hove 50 to or more lorge, roundish-block spots thot cover their entire bodies ond their bodies ore typicolly elongoted. o Like other cufihroot trout, they hove bosibronchiol teeth (on the bose of tongue), ond red sloshes under their iow (hence the nome "cutthroot"). o Femole sexuol moturity is reoch between oges of 3 ond 4, while moles moture ot 2 or 3 yeors of oge. o Generolly, they occur in cool flowing woier with ovoiloble cover of well-vegetoted ond stoble streom bonks, in oreos where there ore streom velocity breoks, ond in relotively silt free, rocky riffle-run oreos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Walker Basin, Nevada and California: Physical Environment, Hydrology, and Biology
    EXHIBIT 89 The Walker Basin, Nevada and California: Physical Environment, Hydrology, and Biology Dr. Saxon E. Sharpe, Dr. Mary E. Cablk, and Dr. James M. Thomas Desert Research Institute May 2007 Revision 01 May 2008 Publication No. 41231 DESERT RESEARCH INSTITUTE DOCUMENT CHANGE NOTICE DRI Publication Number: 41231 Initial Issue Date: May 2007 Document Title: The Walker Basin, Nevada and California: Physical Environment, Hydrology, and Biology Author(s): Dr. Saxon E. Sharpe, Dr. Mary E. Cablk, and Dr. James M. Thomas Revision History Revision # Date Page, Paragraph Description of Revision 0 5/2007 N/A Initial Issue 1.1 5/2008 Title page Added revision number 1.2 “ ii Inserted Document Change Notice 1.3 “ iv Added date to cover photo caption 1.4 “ vi Clarified listed species definition 1.5 “ viii Clarified mg/L definition and added WRPT acronym Updated lake and TDS levels to Dec. 12, 2007 values here 1.6 “ 1 and throughout text 1.7 “ 1, P4 Clarified/corrected tui chub statement; references added 1.8 “ 2, P2 Edited for clarification 1.9 “ 4, P2 Updated paragraph 1.10 “ 8, Figure 2 Updated Fig. 2007; corrected tui chub spawning statement 1.11 “ 10, P3 & P6 Edited for clarification 1.12 “ 11, P1 Added Yardas (2007) reference 1.13 “ 14, P2 Updated paragraph 1.14 “ 15, Figure 3 & P3 Updated Fig. to 2007; edited for clarification 1.15 “ 19, P5 Edited for clarification 1.16 “ 21, P 1 Updated paragraph 1.17 “ 22, P 2 Deleted comma 1.18 “ 26, P1 Edited for clarification 1.19 “ 31-32 Clarified/corrected/rearranged/updated Walker Lake section 1.20
    [Show full text]
  • A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States And
    t a AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY QL 614 .A43 V.2 .A 4-3 AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY Special Publication No. 2 A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes -^ ru from the United States m CD and Canada (SECOND EDITION) A/^Ssrf>* '-^\ —---^ Report of the Committee on Names of Fishes, Presented at the Ei^ty-ninth Annual Meeting, Clearwater, Florida, September 16-18, 1959 Reeve M. Bailey, Chairman Ernest A. Lachner, C. C. Lindsey, C. Richard Robins Phil M. Roedel, W. B. Scott, Loren P. Woods Ann Arbor, Michigan • 1960 Copies of this publication may be purchased for $1.00 each (paper cover) or $2.00 (cloth cover). Orders, accompanied by remittance payable to the American Fisheries Society, should be addressed to E. A. Seaman, Secretary-Treasurer, American Fisheries Society, Box 483, McLean, Virginia. Copyright 1960 American Fisheries Society Printed by Waverly Press, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland lutroduction This second list of the names of fishes of The shore fishes from Greenland, eastern the United States and Canada is not sim- Canada and the United States, and the ply a reprinting with corrections, but con- northern Gulf of Mexico to the mouth of stitutes a major revision and enlargement. the Rio Grande are included, but those The earlier list, published in 1948 as Special from Iceland, Bermuda, the Bahamas, Cuba Publication No. 1 of the American Fisheries and the other West Indian islands, and Society, has been widely used and has Mexico are excluded unless they occur also contributed substantially toward its goal of in the region covered. In the Pacific, the achieving uniformity and avoiding confusion area treated includes that part of the conti- in nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Tahoe Region Aquatic Invasive Species Management Plan CALIFORNIA ‐ NEVADA
    Lake Tahoe Region Aquatic Invasive Species Management Plan CALIFORNIA ‐ NEVADA DRAFT September 2009 Pending approval by the Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force This Aquatic Invasive Species Management Plan is part of a multi-stakeholder collaborative effort to minimize the deleterious effects of nuisance and invasive aquatic species in the Lake Tahoe Region. This specific product is authorized pursuant to Section 108 of Division C of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2005, Public Law 108-447 and an interagency agreement between the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the California Tahoe Conservancy. This product was prepared by: Suggested citation: USACE. 2009. Lake Tahoe Region Aquatic Invasive Species Management Plan, California - Nevada. 84 pp + Appendices. Cover photo credits: Lake Tahoe shoreline, Toni Pennington (Tetra Tech, Inc.); curlyleaf pondweed, Steve Wells (PSU); Asian clams, Brant Allen (UCD); bullfrog (USGS), zebra mussels (USGS); bluegill and largemouth bass (USACE) ii i Table of Contents Acknowledgements................................................................................................................ iii Acronyms ............................................................................................................................... iv Glossary.................................................................................................................................. vi Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings Template
    Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat (CSAS) Research Document 2019/033 Central and Arctic Region Information in support of a Recovery Potential Assessment of Redside Dace (Clinostomus elongatus) in Canada Dominique E. Lebrun, Lynn D. Bouvier, Monica Choy, David W. Andrews, and D. Andrew R. Drake Fisheries and Oceans Canada Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 867 Lakeshore Road Burlington, ON, L7S 1A1 September 2020 Foreword This series documents the scientific basis for the evaluation of aquatic resources and ecosystems in Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of the day in the time frames required and the documents it contains are not intended as definitive statements on the subjects addressed but rather as progress reports on ongoing investigations. Published by: Fisheries and Oceans Canada Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat 200 Kent Street Ottawa ON K1A 0E6 http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas-sccs/ [email protected] © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2020 ISSN 1919-5044 Correct citation for this publication: Lebrun, D.E., Bouvier, L.D., Choy, M., Andrews, D.W., and Drake, D. Andrew R. 2020. Information in support of a Recovery Potential Assessment of Redside Dace (Clinostomus elongatus) in Canada. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Res. Doc. 2019/033. v + 49 p. Aussi disponible en français : Lebrun, D.E., Bouvier, L.D., Choy, M., Andrews, D.W., and Drake, D. Andrew R. 2020. Information à l’appui d’une évaluation du potentiel de rétablissement du méné long (Clinostomus elongatus) au Canada. Secr. can. de consult. sci. du MPO. Doc. de rech.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph R. Tomelleri 28 27
    Nevada 29 34 35 32 2 31 30 3 1 33 20 18 6 4 19 5 8 17 16 12 7 23 15 24 9 21 25 22 10 26 14 13 11 41 36 39 40 38 37 Illustrations by JOSEPH R. TOMELLERI 28 27 N A T I V E F I S H E S O F N E V A D A G R O U P IN G S B Y F A M ILY KILLIFISHES ∙ Cyprinodontidae 11. Big Spring spinedace ∙ Lepidomeda mollispinis pratensis† POOLFISHES ∙ Empetrichthyidae 31. Mountain sucker ∙ Catostomus platyrhynchus 1. Devils Hole pupfish ∙ Cyprinodon diabolis* 12. Moapa dace ∙ Moapa coriacea* 22. Preston White River springfish ∙ Crenichthys baileyi albivallis 32. Warner sucker ∙ Catostomus warnerensis† 2. Ash Meadows Amargosa pupfish ∙ Cyprinodon nevadensis mionectes* 13. Woundfin ∙ Plagopterus argentissimus* 23. Hiko White River springfish ∙ Crenichthys baileyi grandis* 33. Wall Canyon sucker ∙ Catostomus sp. 3. Warm Springs Amargosa pupfish ∙ Cyprinodon nevadensis pectoralis* 14. Colorado pikeminnow ∙ Ptychocheilus lucius* 24. Moapa White River springfish ∙ Crenichthys baileyi moapae 34. Cui-ui ∙ Chasmistes cujus* 25. Railroad Valley springfish ∙ Crenichthys nevadae† 35. Razorback sucker ∙ Xyrauchen texanus* MINNOWS ∙ Cyprinidae 15. Northern pikeminnow ∙ Ptychocheilus oregonesis 26. Pahrump poolfish ∙ Empetrichthys latos* 4. Desert dace ∙ Eremichthys acros† 16. Relict dace ∙ Relictus solitarius TROU T S ∙ Salmonidae 17. Moapa speckled dace ∙ Rhinichthys osculus moapae 5. Humpback chub ∙ Gila cypha* S CUL P INS ∙ Cottidae 36. Mountain whitefish ∙ Prosopium williamsoni 18. Ash Meadows speckled dace ∙ Rhinichthys osculus nevadensis* † 6. Bonytail chub ∙ Gila elegans* 27. Mottled sculpin ∙ Cottus bairdii 37. Lahontan cutthroat trout ∙ Onchorhynchus clarkii henshawi 19. White River speckled dace ∙ Rhinichthys osculus ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin-Wide Native Non-Game Fish Assessment
    Basin‐wide Native Non‐game Fish Assessment 2011 Annual Report Revised on February 21, 2013 USDA Forest Service, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit Written by Christopher Lemmers (Biological Science Technician) and Maura Santora (Aquatic Biologist) Reviewed by Sarah Muskopf (Acting Forest Aquatic Biologist) and Shana Gross (Forest Ecologist) Approved by Holly Eddinger (Biological Program Leader) Original Version: April 19, 2012 Revised Version: February 21, 2013 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Results ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 Discussion ................................................................................................................................................... 11 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Works Cited ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A List of the Freshwater and Anadromous Fishes of California ’
    4 CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME Ca/if. fish and Game 67 ( 1) : 4-38 1981 A LIST OF THE FRESHWATER AND ANADROMOUS FISHES OF CALIFORNIA ’ ’ LEO SHAPOVALOV’, ALMO I. CORDONE, AND WILLIAM A. DILL’ Inland Fisheries Branch California Department of Fish and Game 1416 Ninth Street Sacramento, California 95814 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT . 4 INTRODUCTION ..: . 4 PURPOSE . 5 SCIENTIFIC NAMES . 5 COMMON NAMES . 7 SCOPE . 9 Marine Fishes Successfully fntroduced into the Salton Sea . 9 Forms and Names New to the Main List Since 1959 . 10 Forms and Names Removed from the Main List Since 1959 . 21 REVISED MAIN LIST . 23 Native Species and Established Exotic Species . 23 REVISED SUPPLEMENTARY LISTS . 27 Native Species-Extinct in California . 27 Exotic Species-Unsuccessfully introduced or of Uncertain Status . ...29 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . 35 REFERENCES . 35 This list is the second revision of the check list of the freshwater, anadromous, and euryhaline fishes of California published by Shapovalov and Dill (1950) and first revised by Shapovalov, Dill, and Cordone (1959). The present list consists of a main list of native and established exotic species and five supplementary lists: (i) native species extinct in California, (ii) exotic species unsuccessfully introduced or of uncertain status, (iii) marine fishes successfully introduced into the Salton Sea, (iv) forms and names new to the main list since 1959, and (v) forms and names removed from the main list since 1959. The main list is composed of 124 full species, compris- ing 66 native freshwater and anadromous species, 13 native euryhaline or marine species which occasionally penetrate into fresh water, and 45 introduced species.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Ultraviolet Radiation (UVR) on the Life Stages of Fish
    Effect of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) on the life stages of fish Item Type Article Authors Alves, Ricardo; Agusti, Susana Citation Alves, R. N., & Agustí, S. (2020). Effect of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) on the life stages of fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. doi:10.1007/s11160-020-09603-1 Eprint version Publisher's Version/PDF DOI 10.1007/s11160-020-09603-1 Publisher Springer Nature Journal Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries Rights This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. Download date 26/09/2021 00:14:33 Item License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10754/662898 Rev Fish Biol Fisheries https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-020-09603-1 (0123456789().,-volV)( 0123456789().,-volV) REVIEWS Effect of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) on the life stages of fish Ricardo N. Alves . Susana Agustı´ Received: 31 August 2019 / Accepted: 24 April 2020 Ó The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Current levels of Ultraviolet Radiation with excessive UVR exposure are also revised.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Distribution and Habitat Selection by the Redside Shiner, Richardsonius Balteatus, in a Small Oregon Stream
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Kenneth J. Rodnick for the degree of Master of Science in Department of Fisheries presented on March 11, 1983 Title: Seasonal distribution and habitat selection by the redside shiner, Richardsonius balteatus, in a small Oregon stream Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: Hiram W. Li Seasonal habitat availability, utilization, and selection byyoung of the year (<25 mm) and adult (>25 mm) redside shiner, Richardsonius balteatus, were studied for 1 year in sections of Greasy Creek, Benton County, Oregon. Intensive stream mapping procedures and snorkling observations provided most of the quantitative measures for habitat availability and utilization respectively. A multivariate discriminant analysis and classification suggested spatial segregation of young of the year and adult redside shiners along gradients of water velocity and depth of the water column. Throughout the year, young redside shiners occupied shallower water than adults and utilized areas with lower mean water velocities. Associated with increased winter stream flows and lowered water temperatures (< 100 C), redside shiners were inactive and found in habitats offering the most cover and refuge from current. Overwintering areas populated by redside shiners included undercut banks, root wads, bank failures, fallen trees, and backwaters. During the transitional period between winter andsummer, adult redside shiners shifted from overwintering habitats to the fasterwater of the main channel. Activities related to spawning and aggressive defense of space accompanied this shift. Young redside shiners continued to utilize protected margins. A multivariate discriminant analysis and classification comparing available and utilized stream habitats provided indices ofhabitat selection. Both young of the year and adult redside shinerswere relatively selective in the stream habitats they utilized.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Condition Index Development for the Lower Truckee River and Eastern Sierra Nevada Rivers: Fish Assemblage
    Biological Condition Index Development for the Lower Truckee River and Eastern Sierra Nevada Rivers: Fish Assemblage Prepared by: Robert M. Hughes and Thomas R. Whittier Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Oregon State University 200 SW 35th Street Corvallis, Oregon 97333 541 754 4516 [email protected] Gregg A. Lomnicky Dynamac Corporation 200 SW 35th Street Corvallis, Oregon 97333 Prepared for: Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe Nevada Division of Environmental Protection April 2005 Executive Summary We developed a fish assemblage IBI for western Nevada rivers and applied it to the Truckee River. Available state and federal fish assemblage data from the Carson, Walker, and upper Truckee rivers were analyzed to select and score metrics. Selected metrics included number of native species, % sculpin individuals, % mountain whitefish individuals, evidence of sculpin and whitefish reproduction, % cutthroat trout individuals, % sensitive individuals, % mountain sucker individuals, % omnivorous individuals, % highly tolerant individuals, % alien individuals, and % external anomalies. Metrics were scored continuously from 0-1 and the IBI was scored from 0-10 by summing the metrics. Those metrics and scoring criteria were then applied to existing fish assemblage data for the lower Truckee River. The IBI declined from the Nevada border to Wadsworth, with sharp declines at river miles 57 (Oxbow), 69 (Mustang), and 87 (Painted Rock). Revisits to the same sites indicated that IBI scores may vary by 1.0 as a result of temporal and sampling variation. We consider median IBI scores >7.5 as acceptable, 5.0-7.4 as marginally damaged, and <5.0 as damaged. However, these are only guidelines and 2.0 changes in IBI scores over space or time are probably biologically significant.
    [Show full text]