2015 Annual Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
NCLR-Annual-Report-2
national center for lesbian rights 2005 ANNUAL REPORT WWW.NCLRIGHTS.ORG 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 9 9 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 9 1 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 4 2005 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 89 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2003 2004 2005 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 9 5 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 9 7 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1977 1978 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003“ 2004Since 2005 1977,1977 1978 the1979 1980National 1981 1982 Center1983 1984 1985for 1986Lesbian 1987 1988 Rights 1989 1990 1991 1992 9 3 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 85 1986 1987 1988 1989has 1990 been 1991 at 1992 the 1993 forefront 1994 1995 1996 of 1997nearly 1998 1999every 2000 legal 2001 2002 gain 2003 2004 2005 7 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 9 9 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 9 1 1992 1993 1994won 1995 1996 for 1997 LGBT 1998 1999people 2000 2001and 2002 families. -
2003 Annual Report Breast Cancer Action
Breast Cancer Action Annual Report 2003 Coming Together: Moving From Illness to Activism Founded by a group of women who realized the power of community, Breast Cancer Action was born from a need for a grassroots organization with a unique understanding of the political, economic, and social context of breast cancer. Today BCA’s mission is to carry the voices of people affected by breast cancer in order to inspire and compel the changes necessary to end this epidemic. Never straying far from our community-based roots, and with a keen eye toward structural change, BCA organizes people to do something besides worry about breast cancer. 2003 was an extraordinary year for our organization and our movement. We came togeth- er in entirely new ways. New bridges were built. New steps were taken. Bold moves for- ward were made. Our community grew exponentially and our critical messages—that every woman should have access to information and care, that we need true prevention of breast cancer, and that we must develop more effective and less toxic treatments—reached an ever- growing audience. Together we demanded, and ultimately effected, lasting change. Information: The Key to Activism Information is an essential precursor to action. BCA has always been committed to providing accurate, reliable, and honest information about breast cancer. We reach the public through our English- and Spanish-language newsletters, our web site, and a toll-free number. By pro- viding information, BCA both enables people to make informed decisions for themselves and supports their activism. In 2003, we mailed the BCA Newsletter to an expanding list of more than 12,000 individu- als and institutions. -
2012 Annual Report
2012 ANNUAL REPORT LIGHTING THE WAY FOR LGBT RIGHTS ABOUT NCLR The National Center for Lesbian Rights is a national legal organization committed to advancing the civil and human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people and their families through litigation, public policy advocacy, and public education. Thirty-six years ago, a brave and determined woman, fresh out of law school and eager to make a difference, decided to put her knowledge to good use. As a legal scholar, Donna Hitchens saw the courtroom as a way to change the world. As a lesbian, she had experienced both personal and professional frustrations and fears, and didn’t want others to suffer the same. That was in 1977. Today, that pioneering spirit and unwavering commitment to advance the civil and human rights of all LGBT people continues. Each year, through litigation, public policy advocacy, and public education, NCLR helps more than 5,000 LGBT people and their families nationwide. Our precedent-setting case victories literally rewrite the law, changing the legal landscape for all LGBT people and families across the nation. For more than three decades we’ve been leaders in bringing historic cases, and today we are still blazing trails in pursuit of justice, fairness, and legal protections for all LGBT people. From a humble yet tenacious initial focus on addressing the overlooked discrimination against lesbians, NCLR has grown to expand its life- and law-changing work in order to advance the legal landscape for every LGBT person. Our programs focusing on elder law, employment, family law, federal legislation, healthcare, immigration, marriage, relationship protections, sports, transgender law, and youth create safer homes, safer jobs, and a more just world. -
2014 Annual Report Contents Vision/Mission
2014 ANNUAL REPORT CONTENTS VISION/MISSION Letter from Executive Director ...................................................................3 In 1977 a group of women came Achievements .................................................................................................4 together across racial and class differences to build a truly just social Unique Collaborations Fueled the Global Movement movement that prioritized the needs for LGBTQI Rights .......................................................................................5 and vision of lesbians and women of CommsLabs: Defending Human Rights Through Media and Tech ...6 color. In order to do so, they realized they would need to fund the work Grantee Partners in Action ...................................................................... 11 themselves. Their uncompromising Art to End Silence ...................................................................................... 11 vision became the Astraea Lesbian Foundation for Justice. Building an LGBTQI Movement in West Africa .................................. 12 Undocumented, Unafraid and Organized ............................................. 13 Astraea remains true to this founding lesbian feminist ethos, supporting In Colombia, Trans* Women Demand Changes from Cops ............ 14 movement building through four Thank You! ................................................................................................... 15 strategic pillars: Financial Statement of Activities .......................................................... -
Attachment II
Attachment II THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY The individual California State Colleges were brought together as a system by the Donahoe Higher Education Act of 1960. In 1972 the system became the California State University and Colleges, and in 1982 the system became the California State University. Today the campuses of the CSU include comprehensive and polytechnic universities and, since July 1995, the California Maritime Academy, a specialized campus. The oldest campus—San José State University—was founded in 1857 and became the first institution of public higher education in California. The newest--CSU Channel Islands--opened in fall 2002, with freshmen arriving in fall 2003. Responsibility for the California State University is vested in the Board of Trustees, whose members are appointed by the Governor. The Trustees appoint the Chancellor, who is the chief executive officer of the system, and the Presidents, who are the chief executive officers of the respective campuses. The Trustees, the Chancellor, and the Presidents develop systemwide policy, with implementation at the campus level taking place through broadly based consultative procedures. The Academic Senate of the California State University, made up of elected representatives of the faculty from each campus, recommends academic policy to the Board of Trustees through the Chancellor. Academic excellence has been achieved by the California State University through a distinguished faculty whose primary responsibility is superior teaching. While each campus in the system has its own unique geographic and curricular character, all campuses, as multipurpose institutions, offer undergraduate and graduate instruction for professional and occupational goals as well as broad liberal education. -
Annual Report2016
ANNUAL REPORT 2016 VISION Horizons Foundation envisions a world where all people live free from prejudice and discrimination, and where LGBTQ people contribute to and thrive in a vibrant, diverse, giving, and compassionate community. MISSION A community foundation rooted in and dedicated to the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer community, we exist to: Mobilize and increase resources for the LGBTQ movement and organizations that secure the rights, meet the needs, and celebrate the lives of LGBTQ people. Empower individual donors and promote giving as an integral part of a healthy, compassionate community. Steward a permanently endowed fund through which donors can make legacy gifts to ensure our community’s capacity to meet the future needs of LGBTQ people. DEAR HORIZONS FRIENDS AND FAMILY, Horizons Foundation enjoyed a historical year in 2016, as Now, we are entering the even more crucial second phase of you will see in the pages that follow. The foundation grew Now and Forever – in which our extraordinarily ambitious goal significantly, with its assets topping $25 million by the end is to identify a minimum of $100 million in future legacy of the year. We granted more than $3 million to scores of gifts by 2020. Nobody, anywhere in the LGBTQ movement, organizations advocating for and serving our community; has ever set a comparable goal. (See page 16 to learn more successfully concluded the first phase of the most ambitious and how you can help us achieve this historic milestone). campaign in Horizons’ history; and our LGBTQ Community Endowment Fund reached $10 million for the first time. -
2020-QWOCFF-Program-Book.Pdf
WELCOME Greetings from Yelamu, the traditional unceded territory of the Ramaytush Ohlone people, which is known as San Francisco. This naming is crucial. The hemisphere that QWOCMAP inhabits, the entire Americas, from Canada to Chile, was founded on anti-Native and anti-Black racist violence, from dispossession and enslavement to policing and incarceration, that affects our safety to this very day. QWOCMAP works to end oppression and advance abolition. We use film as protest, as respite, as imagination for a just future. This embodiment of art and culture is grounded in the spiritual and ethical aspects of Black and Indigenous resistance, and that of all people of color. We welcome you to our 16th annual San Francisco International Queer Women of Color Film Festival. Our Festival Focus SafeSpace/NoPlace digs up the roots of injustice, showing how it seeds discourse and proliferates violence against our oppressed communities. From gentrification and displacement to the global pandemic, from the street to our homes, the safety of our communities is crucial to the new world we all need. We want the films and discussions to connect us, even as we are physically distant from each other. We want to spark joy for you and galvanize your courage to act. When we act, we learn and change. And action, making the road as we walk it, creates hope. We cherish working in solidarity with you to create justice. With light, love, and liberation, QWOCMAP STAFF QWOCMAP BOARD Madeleine Lim, Executive Director Alisha Klatt T. Kebo Drew, Managing Director Cassandra Falby Christina Lang, Program Manager Leis Rodriguez, J.D. -
On the Docket Celebrating 33 Years of Fierce Legal Advocacy
On The Docket The audacity to fight for justice. The perseverance to win. SPRING 2010 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Fair Play: NCLR Challenges Discriminatory Sports Practices Page 3 Photo by Trish Tunney | www.trishtunney.com Tunney Trish by Photo Kate Clinton, Jane Lynch, and Kate Kendell Celebrating 33 Years of Fierce Legal Advocacy Thirty-three years ago Donna Hitchens and Roberta Achtenberg founded the Lesbian Rights Project to secure the parenting rights of lesbian mothers who NCLR Hires New Federal were losing custody of their kids, which soon expanded to include advocacy for Policy Attorney Maya the rights of all LGBT people. The National Center for Lesbian Rights grew out of Rupert Page 4 their commitment and passion for justice for LGBT people and our families. On May 1st, a crowd of over 1,200 members and allies of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community celebrated NCLR’s founders’ dream and 33 years of groundbreaking legal advocacy for LGBT people. The night was a celebration of our history, our future, and the courage of our community. In addition to celebrating NCLR’s legal victories and more women than any other national gay or lesbian fierce advocacy, Vicki Randle and Will Phillips were publication. Wolfe Video, now in its 25th year, is the honored for their commitment to advancing the rights oldest and largest exclusive distributor of gay and lesbian of the LGBT community. Legendary musician Cris films in the world. Together,Curve Magazine and Wolfe Williamson awarded Vicki Randle with the Voice and Video have helped provide our community a voice in A Fragile Balance: The Visibility Award. -
The California State University
The California State University The individual California State Colleges were brought together as a The 2007/08 average support cost per full-time equivalent student based on General Fund appropriation and State University Fee reve- system by the Donahoe Higher Education Act of 1960. In 1972 the nue only is $11,553 and when including all sources as indicated below system became the California State University and Colleges, and in is $12,567. Of this amount, the average student fee support per FTE is 1982 the system became the California State University. Today the $3,864, which includes all fee revenue in the CSU Operating Fund campuses of the CSU include comprehensive and polytechnic univer- (e.g. State University Fee, nonresident tuition, application fees, and sities and, since July 1995, the California Maritime Academy, a spe- other miscellaneous fees). cialized campus. The oldest campus – San José State University – was founded in 1857 and became the first institution of public higher education in Cal- ifornia. The newest – CSU Channel Islands – opened in fall 2002, with freshmen arriving in fall 2003. Average Responsibility for the California State University is vested in the Cost Per FTE board of trustees, whose members are appointed by the Governor. 2007/08 Amount Student Percentage The trustees appoint the chancellor, who is the chief executive officer of the system, and the presidents, who are the chief executive officers of the respective campuses. Total Support Cost $4,486,256,000 $12,591 100% The trustees, the chancellor, and the presidents develop system- wide policy, with implementation at the campus level taking place –State Appropriation 2,985,874,000 8,380 66% through broadly based consultative procedures. -
JEWELLE GOMEZ & DIANE SABIN Petitioners, in Re Marriage Cases
JEWELLE GOMEZ & DIANE SABIN Petitioners, In re Marriage Cases We have been together for 16 years now. When we met, it was absolutely love at first sight. But life and professions intervened. However, eight years later I moved across the country to start a life with Diane and neither of us has once regretted the decision. We consider ourselves to be engaged, a term that represents an active state of connection, reflecting the complete commitment and love that we both feel. Now in our 50’s, the age of many grandparents, we face similar challenges as the rest of the aging population, with the added obstacles of being denied the right to marry thrown in our emotional and economic paths. Going through the issues of family and friends aging, planning for retirement and growing old are challenging enough, but navigating them without the rights and privileges afforded to other married couples makes the situation even more complicated and frustrating. Aside from the emotional and social benefits of marriage, there are countless tangible rights that marriage grants to couples—more than 1,000 according to legal experts. As we prepare for retirement, neither of us can designate the other to receive social security survivor benefits in the event of one of our deaths. Will that mean one of us will lose such significant income she has to leave our home? Even after A.B. 205, the California Domestic Partnership Act went into effect in 2003, we still had anxiety. Like many people in our middle years, we have both have had to undergo serious surgeries recently and we paid considerable attorney’s fees to draft durable power of attorney paperwork in the event of an emergency. -
AGENDA COMMITTEE on EDUCATIONAL POLICY Meeting
AGENDA COMMITTEE ON EDUCATIONAL POLICY Meeting: 10:15 a.m., Tuesday, November 5, 2013 Glenn S. Dumke Auditorium Roberta Achtenberg, Chair Debra S. Farar, Vice Chair Rebecca D. Eisen Douglas Faigin Margaret Fortune Lupe C. Garcia Steven M. Glazer William Hauck Lou Monville J. Lawrence Norton Cipriano Vargas Consent Items Approval of Minutes of Meeting of September 24, 2013 Discussion 1. Update on the Early Assessment Program , Information 2. Update on SB 1440: Student Transfer Achievement Reform Act, Information 3. The California State University Institute for Palliative Care at California State University San Marcos, Information 4. The California State University Nursing Programs Update, Information 5. Outstanding Faculty Website, Information MINUTES OF MEETING OF COMMITTEE ON EDUCATIONAL POLICY Trustees of The California State University Office of the Chancellor Glenn S. Dumke Conference Center 401 Golden Shore Long Beach, California September 24, 2013 Members Present Roberta Achtenberg, Chair Debra S. Farar, Vice Chair Rebecca D. Eisen Douglas Faigin Margaret Fortune Lupe C. Garcia Steven M. Glazer William Hauck Peter G. Mehas Lou Monville J. Lawrence Norton Cipriano Vargas Timothy P. White, Chancellor Bob Linscheid, Chair of the Board Trustee Roberta Achtenberg called the meeting to order. Approval of Minutes The minutes of July 23, 2013, were approved as submitted. Speaker Daniel Thomas Clark, a Fresno State student and vice president of legislative affairs for the California State Student Association, thanked the governor and trustees for supporting SB 1440, particularly since he is a former transfer student. He said the pathway needs to be better communicated to community college and high school students so more students use that option. -
CITY of SOUTH GATE Draft Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI)
CITY OF SOUTH GATE Draft Analysis of Impediments To Fair Housing Choice (AI) Community Development Department July 14, 2020 SECTION I INTRODUCTION SECTION I INTRODUCTION A. FORMAT OF THE AI REPORT The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has not issued regulations defining the scope of analysis and the format to be used by grantees when they prepare their Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI). In 1996, HUD published a Fair Housing Planning Guide which includes a “Suggested AI Format.” Because this Guide is the only official guidance provided by HUD to grantees on how to prepare and organize an AI, South Gate’s AI conforms to the format suggested by HUD. Section I Introduction: The Introduction presents the AI report format; South Gate’s regional setting, purpose of the report, fair housing definition, lead agency, funding, and progress made toward implementing the 2015-2020 AI. Section II Fair Housing Action Plan: Section II describes the conclusions and recommendations resulting from the AI analysis. It identifies impediments to fair housing choice and the actions that will be taken to remove or ameliorate impediments during the FY 2020/2021 to FY 2024/2025 time period. Actions to affirmatively further fair housing also are described in the Fair Housing Action Plan. Section III Fair Housing Legal Status: This Section discusses fair housing complaints and compliance reviews and other information pertaining to South Gate’s fair housing legal status. Section IV: City Background Data: HUD advises grantees to include in the AI “jurisdictional background data” on demographics, income, employment, housing and other relevant data.