The Kotmale Environment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Final Report Volume Ii Appendix (1/2)
DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA MAHAWELI AUTHORITY OF SRI LANKA (MASL) PREPARATORY SURVEY ON MORAGAHAKANDA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FINAL REPORT VOLUME II APPENDIX (1/2) JULY 2010 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. SAD CR (5) 10-011 DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA MAHAWELI AUTHORITY OF SRI LANKA (MASL) PREPARATORY SURVEY ON MORAGAHAKANDA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FINAL REPORT VOLUME II APPENDIX (1/2) JULY 2010 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY NIPPON KOEI CO., LTD. PREPARATORY SURVEY ON MORAGAHAKANDA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FINAL REPORT LIST OF VOLUMES VOLUME I MAIN REPORT VOLUME II APPENDIX (1/2) APPENDIX A GEOLOGY APPENDIX B WATER BALANCE Not to be disclosed until the APPENDIX C REVIEW OF DESIGN OF contract agreements for all the FACILITIES OF THE PROJECT works and services are concluded. APPENDIX D COST ESTIMATE APPENDIX E ECONOMIC EVALUATION VOLUME III APPENDIX (2/2) APPENDIX F ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION APPENDIX A GEOLOGY APPENDIX A GEOLOGY REPORT 1. Introduction Geological Investigations for Moragahakanda dam were commenced by USOM in 1959, and core drilling surveys were subsequently done by UNDP/FAO and Irrigation Department of Sri Lanka in 1967/1968 and 1977/1978 respectively. A full-scale geological investigation including core drilling, seismic prospecting, work adit, in-situ rock shear test, construction material survey and test grouting was carried out for the feasibility study by JICA in 1979 (hereinafter referred to FS (1979)). Almost twenty years had past after FS (1979), additional feasibility study including 34 drill holes was carried out by Lahmeyer International Associates in 2000/2001 (hereinafter referred to FS (2001)). Subsequently, supplemental geological investigations including core drilling, electric resistivity survey and laboratory tests for rock materials were done by MASL in 2007. -
World Bank Document
PROCUREMENT PLAN (Textual Part) Project information: country]Sri Lanka – Water Resources Management Project-P-166865 Project Implementation agency: Ministry of Mahaweli Development and Environment Public Disclosure Authorized Date of the Procurement Plan: 24 June, 2019 Period covered by this Procurement Plan: 24 June 2019-31 Dee. 2020 Preamble In accordance with paragraph 5.9 of the “World Bank Procurement Regulations for IPF Borrowers” (July 2016) (“Procurement Regulations”) the Bank’s Systematic Tracking and Exchanges in Procurement (STEP) system will be used to prepare, clear and update Procurement Plans and conduct all procurement transactions for the Project. This textual part along with the Procurement Plan tables in STEP constitute the Procurement Plan Public Disclosure Authorized for the Project. The following conditions apply to all procurement activities in the Procurement Plan. The other elements of the Procurement Plan as required under paragraph 4.4 of the Procurement Regulations are set forth in STEP. The Bank’s Standard Procurement Documents: shall be used for all contracts subject to international competitive procurement and those contracts as specified in the Procurement Plan tables in STEP. National Procurement Arrangements: In accordance with the Procurement Regulations for IPF Borrowers (July 2016, revised November 2017) (“Procurement Regulations”), when approaching the national market, as agreed in the Procurement Plan tables in STEP, the country’s own Public Disclosure Authorized procurement procedures may be used. When the Borrower, for the procurement of goods, works and non-consulting services, uses its own national open competitive procurement arrangements as set forth in Sri Lanka’s Procurement Guidelines 2006, such arrangements shall be subject to paragraph 5.4 of the Bank’s Procurement Regulations and the following conditions: 1. -
The Government of the Democratic
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31ST DECEMBER 2019 DEPARTMENT OF STATE ACCOUNTS GENERAL TREASURY COLOMBO-01 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1. Note to Readers 1 2. Statement of Responsibility 2 3. Statement of Financial Performance for the Year ended 31st December 2019 3 4. Statement of Financial Position as at 31st December 2019 4 5. Statement of Cash Flow for the Year ended 31st December 2019 5 6. Statement of Changes in Net Assets / Equity for the Year ended 31st December 2019 6 7. Current Year Actual vs Budget 7 8. Significant Accounting Policies 8-12 9. Time of Recording and Measurement for Presenting the Financial Statements of Republic 13-14 Notes 10. Note 1-10 - Notes to the Financial Statements 15-19 11. Note 11 - Foreign Borrowings 20-26 12. Note 12 - Foreign Grants 27-28 13. Note 13 - Domestic Non-Bank Borrowings 29 14. Note 14 - Domestic Debt Repayment 29 15. Note 15 - Recoveries from On-Lending 29 16. Note 16 - Statement of Non-Financial Assets 30-37 17. Note 17 - Advances to Public Officers 38 18. Note 18 - Advances to Government Departments 38 19. Note 19 - Membership Fees Paid 38 20. Note 20 - On-Lending 39-40 21. Note 21 (Note 21.1-21.5) - Capital Contribution/Shareholding in the Commercial Public Corporations/State Owned Companies/Plantation Companies/ Development Bank (8568/8548) 41-46 22. Note 22 - Rent and Work Advance Account 47-51 23. Note 23 - Consolidated Fund 52 24. Note 24 - Foreign Loan Revolving Funds 52 25. -
A Case Study of the Kotmale Dam in Sri Lanka Jagath Manatungea* and Naruhiko Takesadab
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Repository, University of Moratuwa International Journal of Water Resources Development Vol. 29, No. 1, March 2013, 87–100 Long-term perceptions of project-affected persons: a case study of the Kotmale Dam in Sri Lanka Jagath Manatungea* and Naruhiko Takesadab aDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka; bFaculty of Humanity and Environment, Hosei University, Tokyo, Japan (Received 3 June 2012; final version received 11 June 2012) Many of the negative consequences of dam-related involuntary displacement of affected communities can be overcome by careful planning and by providing resettlers with adequate compensation. In this paper the resettlement scheme of the Kotmale Dam in Sri Lanka is revisited, focusing on resettlers’ positive perceptions. Displaced communities expressed satisfaction when income levels and stability were higher in addition to their having access to land ownership titles, good irrigation infrastructure, water, and more opportunities for their children. However, harsh climate conditions, increased incidence of diseases and human–wildlife conflicts caused much discomfort among resettlers. Diversification away from paddy farming to other agricultural activities and providing legal land titles would have allowed them to gain more from resettlement compensation. Keywords: dam construction; involuntary displacement; livelihood rebuilding; resettlement compensation Introduction Over the decades, there has been growing concern about the negative consequences of the involuntary displacement of rural communities for large-scale infrastructure development (De Wet, 2006; Robinson, 2003). The construction of dams is the most often cited example of development projects that cause forced displacement of communities (McCully, 2001). -
(Ifasina) Willeyi Horn (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) of Sri Lanka
JoTT COMMUNI C ATION 3(2): 1493-1505 The current occurrence, habitat and historical change in the distribution range of an endemic tiger beetle species Cicindela (Ifasina) willeyi Horn (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) of Sri Lanka Chandima Dangalle 1, Nirmalie Pallewatta 2 & Alfried Vogler 3 1,2 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Colombo, Colombo 03, Sri Lanka 3 Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom Email: 1 [email protected] (corresponding author), 2 [email protected], 3 [email protected] Date of publication (online): 26 February 2011 Abstract: The current occurrence, habitat and historical change in distributional range Date of publication (print): 26 February 2011 are studied for an endemic tiger beetle species, Cicindela (Ifasina) willeyi Horn of Sri ISSN 0974-7907 (online) | 0974-7893 (print) Lanka. At present, the species is only recorded from Maha Oya (Dehi Owita) and Handapangoda, and is absent from the locations where it previously occurred. The Editor: K.A. Subramanian current habitat of the species is explained using abiotic environmental factors of the Manuscript details: climate and soil recorded using standard methods. Morphology of the species is Ms # o2501 described by studying specimens using identification keys for the genus and comparing Received 02 July 2010 with specimens available at the National Museum of Colombo, Sri Lanka. The DNA Final received 29 December 2010 barcode of the species is elucidated using the mitochondrial CO1 gene sequence of Finally accepted 05 January 2011 eight specimens of Cicindela (Ifasina) willeyi. The study suggests that Maha Oya (Dehi Owita) and Handapangoda are suitable habitats. -
Statistical Book
Mahaweli Authority of Sri Lanka Socio – Economic Statistics 2018 Mahaweli Authority of Sri Lanka Mahaweli Authority of Sri Lanka was Established Under Act No. 23 of 1979 VISION “The best organization in Sri Lanka, in excellence use of land & water for the innovative Agriculture, renewable energy, conserving environment and raising the living standards of citizens” MISSION “We strive to lead the use of land & water for the innovative Agriculture productivity based on the latest technology supplementing the generation of renewable energy, best environment and tourism for the enrichment of the Sri Lankan community and their living standards” Contents Selected Economic and Social Indicators I- IV 1. Introduction 01-02 2. Background Information 03-05 2.1. Mahaweli Areas belonging to the Mahaweli Authority of Sri Lanka 2.2. Basic Information on Mahaweli Areas 3. Irrigation and Power Generation 06-16 3.1. Current Water Capacity of Irrigation Reservoirs for Agriculture as at 31.12.2018 3.2. Hydropower Generation in Major Reservoirs and Mini Hydropower Stations 4. Land Development 17-20 5. Settlement and Household Information 21-29 6. Economic and Social Infrastructure Facilities 30-37 6.1. Social Infrastructure Facilities (Cumulative) 6.2. Social and Economic Infrastructure Facilities (Cumulative) – 2018 6.3. Distribution of Type of Schools in Mahaweli Areas – 2018 6.4. Economic Infrastructure Facilities (Cumulative) 7. Agriculture and Livestock 38-84 7.1. Agriculture 7.2. Extent and Production of Other Field Crops in Mahaweli Areas 7.3. Livestock and Inland Fish 8. Investment Projects in Mahaweli Areas 85-86 9. SME Loan Facilities in Mahaweli Areas – 2018 87-88 10. -
A Case Study for Upper Kotmale Hydropower Plant
ENGINEER - Vol. L, No. 04, pp. [75-84], 2018 ©ENGINEE The InstitutionR - Vol. of LI,Engineers, No. 04, Sripp. Lanka [page range], 2018 © The Institution of Engineers, Sri Lanka DOI: http://doi.org/10.4038/engineer.v51i4.7315 The Economic Comparison of Reservoir Type and Run Estimated support categories based on the tunneling quality index Q (After Grimstad and Barton, 1993) of the River Type Hydropower Plants: A Case Study for Upper Kotmale Hydropower Plant H.A.H. Amanda, W.A.D.S. Wijayapala, J.R. Lucas and W.J.L.S. Fernando Abstract: Due to the severity of impacts predicted due to climate change issues, Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions need to be considered as a factor even for hydropower because of the identified emission possibilities associated with large reservoirs. Thus, when planning a large hydropower project at a selected location, it is important to decide on the type of power plant based on an economic comparison including environmental considerations. The existing 150MW, Talawakele run of the river type hydropower plant and the previously planned reservoir type Caledonia hydropower plant were selected for comparison in this study. Net greenhouse gas emissions from both projects were estimated based on several estimating techniques and for the economic comparison, the levelized cost of electricity of both projects were calculated. Results show that the unit cost of electricity generation from run of the river type is substantially lower (around LKR 4 per kWh) than that of reservoir type. On the other hand, as Upper Kotmale is a peak-serving plant, a separate comparison was done considering the night peak operation. -
Dam Safety – Annexes
Annexes: Concept Paper for a Dam-related Hazard Warning System in Sri Lanka A Participatory Study on Actions Required to Avoid and Mitigate Dam Disasters http://www.lirneasia.net/2006/01/Dam-Safety-Concept-Paper-Released/ Annex A Consultation Process Input.........................................................t A1 Annex B Comments on Interim Concept Paper: H.A.L.S Yapa, Hydro Tasmania, Australia.................................................................a A19 Annex C Expert Consultation Agenda: 20 May 2005 ................................ A25 Annex D Expert Consultation Invitation letter..........................................r A26 Annex E Sample Public Consultation (town meeting) invitation Letter: Gampola, 2 July 2005*5 ............................................................ A28 Annex F Public Consultation (town meeting) Agenda: Kandy, 2 July 2005.A315 Annex G Public Consultation (town meeting) Agenda: Polonnaruwa, 16 July 2005 ...................................................................................... A32 Annex H Media Conference Agenda: 10 August, 2005..............................5 A33 Annex I Press Conference invitation letter: 10, August 2005 ................... A35 16 January 2006 Annexes: Concept Paper for a Dam-related Hazard Warning System in Sri Lanka Annex A Consultation Process Input Annex A: Consultation process input Comment/Suggestion and Source Response Explanation Governance One agency should be entrusted with dam oversight. Accepted with The agency must not, for ???, Irrigation Department caveat reasons of potential interference, be involved in owning/operating dams. Attempts in the past to create legislation have not Noted progressed past legal drafts stage. Mr de Silva?, speaker #2 in open forum In the past steps have been taken by a Presidential Noted Commission toward establishing a regulatory body. KSR de Silva, Director General of Irrigation & President, Sri Lanka National Committee on Large Dams We need to pass and implement a Dams and Accepted Reservoir Safety Act. -
Mahawe L I Authority of S R I L Aika Brief Ox Accelerated
MAHAWE L I AUTHORITY OF S R I L AIKA BRIEF OX ACCELERATED L4AHAWELI PROGRAMME Monitoring and Progress Control Unit October 1980. PAl' t o ]9 1 , !'e f i L.iit ;, ,:.+ t'!': '11 .'(];,1:1 A I,-tI Ill tlkilliOrll. in It.. economli c fortirnee,. Growth *e.ii.. i -ttiil(d iind h,.r- wer,0 loW .level, 0l Irlveo:tnient . 'Ph, re at vely :l o:ed uconomy , wi th art 'icia]ly admni:iter.ud price!; which did iot ri Icl true co. to!,led to production distortions and a heavy recurreit .;ubsdv burden for the Government. Agriculture, which accounted for one third] of' the gross domestic produJct, was; unable to meet the local demand for food staples such as rice and sugar; the deficits having to be made up by importations from abroad. Unemployment, at around twenty percent, constituted a major social and economic problem, particularl'y as a (unsiderable proportion of those without. Jobs wer. educated young people. There was a serious shortage of exper enced managerial and profo;s ional manpower, created to a large extent by the fUinarieal atrra;tiozin: ol the oil-r ch countries of the Middle East. Ir 1977, laced by thee problem,, the newly elected Government introduced major p, licy innovations aimed at renedyirg the situation. These were ;- Higher private sector involvement in economic development Realistic pricing to reduce the subsidy burden Devaluation of the rupee Acceleration of the Mlahaweli Development Scheme Creation of the Colombo Free Trade Zone Although there is no suggestion that all of Sri Lanka's problems will disappear overnight, there is evidence that this new approach is having the desired effect. -
Forum23 植松g Optimization of Multireservoir Operation by Stochastic Dynamic Programming for Moragolla Hydropower Project in S
Optimization of Multi-reservoir Operation by Stochastic Dynamic Programming for Moragolla Hydropower Project in Sri Lanka International Consulting Operations, Water Resources Division, Water Resources & Energy Department, Sohei UEMATSU ○ Keywords reservoir operation, optimization, hydropower, stochastic dynamic programming ○ Outline Development of new hydropower project into an existing river management system sometimes impair the original purpose of the existing system, especially the new project was not considered in the original design of the river system. It is ideally imperative that the operation performance of existing facilities with planned new facilities is optimized together. However, it is practically difficult to optimize complex river management system without efforts to reduce the time for computation of the modern desktop computers. In the article, the optimization study for the Moragolla hydropower project in Sri Lanka is introduced in detail. The project is a newly planned hydropower project in the Mahaweli river system and the project was not originally designed during the first planning of the river management. Therefore the optimization is done with existing facility in the study. This article introduces the study as an example for multi-dimensional optimization. ○Technical Points This article explained as an example of limiting the number of multi-dimension problem. The optimization algorithm applied for the problem is stochastic dynamic programming (SDP). The program algorithm of SDP is expanded for n-dimension problems and applied for a feasibility study of the planned hydropower project, namely Moragolla Hydropower Project. In the study, daily operation of an existing hydropower and the planned Moragolla hydropower is simultaneously optimized with the multi-dimension SDP. ○ Figure, table, and picture Time Step (day) C.A. -
REVIEW of PROGRESS PROJECT NO.383-0073 Conducted by Frank
REVIEW OF PROGRESS MAHAWELI BASIN DEVELOPMENT - PHASE II PROJECT NO.383-0073 Conducted By Frank D. Correl Hasan A. Hasan Donald G. McClelland Thayer Scudder Colombo, Sri Lanka July 1, 1983 CONTENTS Page I. Purpose of Review and Procedure ........................ 1 II. Summary of Conclusions and Recommendations ............. 2 III. Brief Overview of Mahaweli Development and Scope of U.S. Project .................................. 3 IV. Budgetary and Related Considerations ................... 4 V. Implementation Progress: Construction ................. 6 A. Construction of Main and Branch Canals in Phase 1(a) ...................................... 6 B. Progress by GSL on Downstream Work Program ......... 7 VI. Settlement Planning and Implementation ................. 10 VII. Agricultural Facilities, Services and Policies ......... 13 VIII. Water Management Aspects of System B ................... 15 Ix. Manpower Planning Problems ............................ 16 X. Conclusions and Recommendations ........................ 17 XI. Annexes A. Glossary B. List of Persons Contacted I. Purpose of Review and Procedure This review has been undertaken consistent with a proviso in the AID authori zation of the $85 million loan project (# 383-0073) for Mahaveli Basin Development - Phase II, divided into Phases l(a) and 1(b) of activities on the Left Bank in System B of the Mahaweli Basin area. This proviso the requires approval of AA/ASIA prior to obligation of funds for Phase approval 1(b). Such is to be based on a review of progress in Phase 1(a), particularly the contributions of Sri Lanka and that country's ability to provide (or cause to be provided) adequate funding to support Phase l(b). $68 the amount required million, for completion of Phase 1(a) has been obligated since FY 81. -
Generation Performance in Sri Lanka 2016] 2014
Generation Performance in Sri Lanka Generation Performance 2014 (First Half) in Sri Lanka 2016 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF SRI LANKA [GENERATION PERFORMANCE IN SRI LANKA 2016] 2014 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Energy Generation .......................................................................................................................... 3 3. System Peak Demand ..................................................................................................................... 6 4. Load Factor ...................................................................................................................................... 7 5. Plant Factor ..................................................................................................................................... 8 6. Running Plant Factor ..................................................................................................................... 13 7. Generation Cost ............................................................................................................................ 15 8. Comparison of Scheduled Dispatch and Actual Dispatch ............................................................. 16 9. Auxiliary Consumption .................................................................................................................. 17 10. Availability Factor .....................................................................................................................