Due Diligence Report on Social Safeguard

July 2014

IND: Madhya Pradesh District Connectivity Sector Project

Sample Subprojects:

1. Chitrangi–Kasar Road

2. Dabra–Bhitawar–Harsi Road

3. Mahua–Chuwahi Road

4. Ujjain–Maksi Road

Prepared by the Government of Madhya Pradesh through the Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation for the Asian Development Bank

CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency unit – Indian Rupees (INR) (as of June 6, 2014) INR1.00 = $ 0.01690 $1.00 = INR 59.0361

ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank AP - Affected Person CPS - Country Partnership Strategy DP - Displaced Person DDR - due diligence report DPR - Detail Project Report EA - Executive Agency FYP - Five Year Plan GM - General Manager GOMP - Government of Madhya Pradesh GRC - Grievance Redress Committee GRM - Grievance Redress Mechanism HDI - Human Development Index MPRDC - Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation PPTA - Project Preparatory Technical Assistance RP - Resettlement Plan

This due diligence report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. PROJECT OVERVIEW ...... 1 A. Project Background ...... 1 II. OBJECTIVES OF DUE DILIGENCE REPORT (DDR) ...... 1 A. Methodology of due diligence ...... 2 B. Measures to Minimize Impact ...... 2 III. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM...... 2 IV. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION ...... 2 V. CONCLUSIONS ...... 3 VI. ROAD SPECIFIC FINDINGS ...... 3 A.Chitrangi to Kasar Road ...... 4 B.Dabra–Bhitarwar–Harsi Road ...... 20 C.Mahua-Chuwahi Road ...... 31 D.Ujjain-Maksi Road ...... 54

I. PROJECT OVERVIEW

A. Project Background

1. The Government of Madhya Pradesh (GOMP) has been using a combination of budgetary, PPP, and ADB financing, to improve road network in Madhya Pradesh. ADB has supported numerous state highways and rural roads. However, the intermediate tier, major district roads (MDRs), have not been specifically targeted for improvement resulting in overall poor overall road network connectivity. MDRs form the key linkage between rural, peri-urban and urban areas, and have to be essentially developed to complete state road connectivity. GOMP has now proposed to improve the MDRs through the Madhya Pradesh District Connectivity Sector Project (the Project) financed by ADB. The Project will improve transport connectivity in the state by rehabilitating and upgrading major district roads (MDRs). The Project constitutes (i) rehabilitating and upgrading about 1,600 km of MDRs; (ii) improving road maintenance and asset management; and (iii) developing an efficient accident response system. MPRDC specifically, targeting MDRs to form key linkage between rural, peri-urban and urban areas and complete state road connectivity. The Executing Agency (EA) will be the GOMP acting through the Madhya Pradesh Road Development Authority (MPRDC) and the IAs will be the 10 Project Implementation Units (PIUs).

2. Under the sector loan modality of ADB, a resettlement framework for the project as a whole has been prepared. Sample projects are prepared at time of board approval and non- sample projects will be finalized during project implementation period. Four sample roads have been fully appraised and 43 non-sample roads will also be prepared after approval. For all project roads, the improvement will be limited to within the existing right-of-way, therefore, no land acquisition is envisaged. The 4 sample roads comprise of 188 km traversing through mainly rural areas. It was found that the upgrading of the sample roads will not incur any permanent impact or physical displacement. For the 4 roads, 34 roadside vendors will experience temporary disruption in livelihood during construction period. None of the displaced persons belong to indigenous peoples groups. The details of the four roads are presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Sample Subproject Details Road Name Length (km) District (s) Served CD Block(s) Served Chitrangi - Kasar 39.9km Singrauli Chitrangi Dabra–Bhitawar–Harsi Road 62.4km Gwalior and Dabra, Bhitarwar, and Shivapuri Narvar Mahua–Chuwahi Road 49.1km Sidhi and Singrauli Devsar – Mazholi - Singhwal Ujjain–Maksi Road 36.3km Ujjain, Dewas, and Ujjain, Tarana, Sajapur Tonkhurd, and Makshi

II. OBJECTIVES OF DUE DILIGENCE REPORT (DDR)

3. Objectives of this due diligence report is to: (i) determine whether the section of the subproject road is free of any resettlement impacts, e.g., land acquisition, displacement, adverse impacts on income and livelihood of both titled, non-titled Displaced Persons (DPs); and (ii) review the present field situation of this subproject.

4. The DDR also details the consultation process where the Grievance Redress Process was discussed with people living along the project corridor. 2

A. Methodology of due diligence

5. A survey of the subproject affected households was carried out along the road in the months of April-June 2014 by respective Detailed Project Report (DPR) Consultant. The census was carried out based upon the detailed design drawings prepared by the DPR Consultant. The main objective of the survey was to prepare an inventory of all the affected assets and affected households. Another objective of the survey was to estimate the extent of resettlement impacts due to the Subproject implementation and to prepare a Resettlement Plan accordingly for compensating and providing necessary assistance to the eligible affected people based on ADB guidelines and prevailing law of India. The affected households were interviewed in the Subproject corridor by using structured questionnaire and discussions with the APs and other local people.

6. Along with the census survey of affected households, socioeconomic survey (20% sample) was also carried out in project area to understand social and economical scenario of the project area in the month of May 2014. Poverty and Social Analysis report has been prepared and submitted to ADB.

7. Special public consultations were arranged in the built up areas along the road, including where during initial assessment scope of temporary disruption of livelihood was observed. During field visits, the survey team of respective DPR Consultant made sure to note any views of persons who may be temporarily disrupted their livelihood during road construction activity.

8. During public consultations, information of project was explained by the representatives of DPR Consultant and MPRDC. Grievance Redress Mechanism was explained and distributed written note in local language (Hindi) on GRM along with list (names, address and contact numbers) of Grievance Redress Committees (GRCs) both MPRDC and divisional level to Gram Panchayat, and village key persons.

B. Measures to Minimize Impact

9. The Design Standards of Indian Road Congress has been followed as the basis for the technical design of this Subproject. As an approach to reduce resettlement impact, the detailed design width has taken a variable width approach, ranging from 4.75 to 10 meters in different sections of road alignment as technically required. The detailed engineering design has taken 4.75 meters width for the single lane carriageway including hard shoulders and side drain within the built-up area.

III. GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM

10. To gear up Grievance Redress System within project, a temporary “Grievance Redress Committees” both State (MPRDC) and Divisional level (PIU) have been established in time for community consultations. A guiding note of concept, importance and responsibilities of GRC have been prepared and distributed to all the respective members.

IV. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION

11. The Executing Agency for the project is GOMP through MPRDC. MPRDC is wholly owned by GoMP and has been equipped with adequate capacity to implement the project. The implementation arrangements basically follow the ongoing MPSRSP-II. A General Manager (GM) at MPRDC headquarter has been designated as person in charge for project 3 implementation. The Environmental and Social Cell at MPRDC headquarters, reporting to the General Manager, will be responsible for ensuring compliance with environmental and social safeguards of project roads. MPRDC has seven division offices (Bhopal, Jabalpur, Sagar, Gwalior, Ujjain, Indoor, and Rewa) acting as Project Implementation Units (PIUs), each headed by a Divisional Manager (Tech.) will be responsible for project road implementation in the field. MPRDC will engage Construction Supervision Consultants to act as the engineer for the construction contracts.

V. CONCLUSIONS

12. The results of this Due Diligence study concludes that, there should be no issues of land acquisition and payment of compensation related to this project, if the detailed designs for the project does not change substantially. In case any claims or complaints are submitted during the project implementation period, an effective and efficient Grievance Redress Mechanism, being already in place, will enhance provision of timely and sensible hearings and facilitate solutions.

VI. ROAD SPECIFIC FINDINGS

13. The following section presents the road-specific findings.

A. Chitrangi to Kasar Road

1. Present Road Location

14. This Project road starts from Chitrangi (Existing Km 154+300 & Design Km 153+000) at 3-arm junction and passes through Boda- Bagaiya- -Gondnara- Vaidh Choraha-Gangi- Kasar and ends to Kasar (Existing Km 190+390 & Design Km 188+840). The end point of this section is linked with Katni To Singrauli SH-75. This Project road starts from Chitrangi (Start at Junction with Chitrangi Latitude 24’34'52'' North and Longitude East & 82’53'55'' East Karthuwa Road, Km stone exist at this junction indicating Bodha 4Kms) and passes through Boda-Dola, Dudhmaniya, Gonara, Parsohar, Gangi and ends to Kasar (ends at junction with Singrauli - Bargawan Road). The Total Length of road is 40.390 Kms (Existing) and 39.93 Kms (Design). The alignment is single lane having width of 3-3.75 m only with poor stretches in most of the lengths. The Project road is falling in Singrauli District. The road is through rural area with 7 small villages along the road.

2. Location Map and Binderies

3. Findings

15. During field visit to this sub project area by PPTA Consultants (Social and Environmental) along with MPRDC officials and respective DPR Consultant on April 22, 2014, it was observed that there is no permanent or partial impact on commercial structures in village Podi. It is also noticed that there will be no “Temporary Disruption of Livelihood” during civil work activity in village Podi. The same was observed during ADB mission visit on April 23, 2014. 5

16. Since there are no permanent or partial impact on any asset or temporary disruption of livelihood, it is decided to prepare a due diligence report for this section of road. The Project falls in category C, therefore no resettlement plan is required as there is no private land acquisition or acquisition of other assets. There is no displacement of people and there is no loss of permanent income is caused by sub project. Table A.1 details the findings.

Table A.1: Resettlement Impact Nature of impact Magnitude of impact Number of houses to be displaced No houses exist within ROW in built up and open area, therefore there are no resettlement issues related with housing. Number of Directly Affected Persons There are no directly affected persons. (AP’s) Loss of Agricultural Area / Cropland There is no agriculture land require for improvement of existing road, therefore no loss of agricultural area / cropland. Loss of Orchards There are no losses of orchards. Loss of structures / buildings There is no loss of any structure / building. Loss of individual and community There will be no loss of livelihood permanently or livelihoods temporarily. Damage or disturbance to public utility Total 132 telephone / electric polls will be power relocated. 23 hand pumps supplying drinking water require relocation (Ref. DPR). Loss of grazing and fishing activities There is no loss of grazing and fishing activity. Loss of community properties There is no loss of community property Government property No Government property loss Government property No Government property loss Indigenous People There is no impact on Indigenous People Project Awareness Majority community beneficiaries are aware Gender Impacts During the discussion with community, especially with women it was observed that women’s status is considered to be below that of men. They have low participation in decision making for socioeconomic activities. Resettlement Budget Not applicable Implementation Schedule Not applicable Monitoring and Evaluation The Monitoring & Evaluation activities of this subproject will be limited to monitoring the implementation of construction. It will be ensured that the contractors include the employment of local labor force in the construction and post construction activities. A separate internal monitoring framework is designed (Appendix 6: Internal Monitoring (People’s awareness and feedback).

4. Public Consultation, Disclosure and Information Dissemination

a. Public Consultation

17. During socioeconomic survey of project area, public consultation was arranged on May 8, 2014 in village Gonara, Gangi and Dudhmania villages, on May 9, 2014 in village Chitragni of chitrangi Block of Singrauli district. (Appendix A.2: scanned copy of list of participants and signatures and Appendix A.3: public consultation photographs). During public consultation focus was mainly given on project details, benefits of the project etc.

18. To confirm no temporary disruption of livelihood in the village Podi, public consultation was conducted in this village on June 7, 2014 at 1.30pm. Assistant General Manager, MPRDC and representatives of DPR Consultant facilitated the process. In the beginning AGM MPRDC, introduced about project and role of MPRDC and ADB. Total 15 people including road side shop owners participated in the consultation process. After explaining about the project details, people were asked to give their views. Following are the key issues raised by the villagers participated in consultation:

 The respective civil work contractors should have discussion and share construction plan with road side residents and shop keepers prior to construction activity;  Assurance of quality work required;  Provision of drainage along the road is must;  The respective civil work contractor should have mechanism to control air (dust) and noise pollution during construction within built up area.

19. At the end, Grievance Redress Mechanism and responsibilities of Grievance Redress Committee was explained and a note on GRM and information of GRCs (Hindi) was distributed to all people. The consultation ended with signing of MOU by respective shop owners.

Table A.2: Public Consultation Profile Sr. Name of Block / District Number of participants Date No village 1 Gonara Chitrangi / Singrauli 26 (all male) 08/05/2014 2 Gangi Chitrangi / Singrauli 23 (20 male + 3 female) 08/05/2014 3 Dudhmania Chitrangi / Singrauli 16 (all male) 08/05/2014 4 Chitrangi Chitrangi / Singrauli 27 ( all male) 09/05/2014 Chitrangi 27 (24 male + 3 female) 20/06/2014 5 Podu (Gonara) Chitrangi / Singrauli 15 (all male) 07/06/2014 Total 134 (128 male + 6 female)

b. Community’s Overall Response to the Proposed Sub-Project

20. The major concern of the community is of bad condition of existing road. Some residents also demanded employment of local persons during the construction activity period. The local communities’ responses to the subproject are summarized as follows:

a. Project Awareness: The majority of the beneficiary, especially men communities were found aware of the Project activities.

b. Effects on business and living conditions: Almost all of the community expect a positive impact of the sub-project in terms of improved living standards.

7 c. Job Opportunities: The communities requested to be hired for unskilled to semi-skilled jobs during the construction and operation of the project activities. In such case, priority will be given to women headed households identified during socioeconomic survey (Appendix A.4: Profile of Women Headed HH). d. Provision of Drainage: almost all the villagers reside along the road has made request of appropriate and effective drainage system. e. Road Safety: there is a possibility of accidents due to better quality of road; therefore road safety measures are necessary. f. Road Quality: the quality of road must be up to standards and road should be constructed within given time.

Appendix A.1: Grievance Redress Committee temporarily formed at State (MPRDC) and Divisional level.

GRIEVANCE REDRESS COMMITTEE (STATE LEVEL) MPRDC, BHOPAL (Temporary) Sr. Name of the Designation Address Mobile / email No member 1 Mr. Mehra G. P. Chief 16 – A, Arera Mob: Engineer Hills, Bhopal - 462011 [email protected] 2 Mr. Chaturvedi General 16 – A, Arera Mob:9827328056 P.K. Manager Hills, Bhopal [email protected] 3 Mr. Rajendra Deputy 16 – A, Arera Mob:9406902208 Khade General Hills, Bhopal Manager [email protected] 4 Mr. Deepak Manager 16 – A, Arera Mob: 9424402217 Pandye (Environment Hills, Bhopal and Social [email protected] Unit) 5 Mr. L.K. Dubey Superintende Office of 0998 1050 208 nt Engineer Engineering (PWD) Chief (PWD) Bhopal Bhopal

GRIEVANCE REDRESS COMMITTEE (DIVISIONAL LEVEL), REWA DIVISION, MPRDC

Sr. Name of the member Designation Address Mobile / email No 1 Mr. Bairagi R. S. Divisional Rewa Division 07662 – 231005 Manager (2), 14/397, +91 942549159 Arun Nagar, Rewa [email protected] 2 Mr. Ramakant Dwivedi Assistant Rewa Division 07662 – 231005 General (2), 14/397, +91 777 1895 025 Manager Arun Nagar, Rewa 3 Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh Sub Divisional 0999 3144 760 (Chitrangi – Kasar road) Officer, PWD 4 Mr. Mangaleshwar Sub Divisional 0900 9394 135 Dwivedi (Mahua – Officer, PWD Chuwahi Road)

Appendix A.2: Scanned copies of list of participants with signature

Village Gonara

Village Gangi

Village Dudhmania

Village Chitrangi

Village Chitrangi (June 20, 2014)

Village Podi

Appendix A.3: Public Consultation Photographs

Public Consultation – Village Gangi

Public Consultation – Village Dudhmania Public Consultation 0 Village Chitrangi

Public Consultation 0 Village Chitrangi

Appendix A.4: Profile of Women Headed Households

Village Category Name of head Caste Family Monthly Source of members income income (Rs) Chitrangi WHH Smt.Gulabiya ST 2 2600 Labour WHH Smt.Parvati ST 1 600 Pension WHH Smt.Dasmaniya ST 1 600 Pension WHH SmtTiwariya. ST 1 600 p WHH Smt.Hatiyadevi ST 3 2200 AG Labour WHH SmtRamkumari Gen 5 7000 B WHH SmtRamkali Gen 1 1600 Labour WHH SmtNarwadiya OBC 6 3200 Labour WHH SmtKirshnadevidi Gen 5 4500 Ag Bagaiya WHH SmtHagani Devi ST 1 1500 Labour WHH SmtHaljiyadevi OBC 4 3000 abour WHH SmtRajmati ST 3 2500 Labour WHH SmtJankidevi ST 6 2000 Labour Gangi WHH SmtSubhagiya Devi ST 1 600 Pension WHH SmtEtwariya Devi ST 1 2000 Labour WHH SmtSukmariya Devi ST 1 1500 Labour TOTAL 16

B. Dabra–Bhitarwar–Harsi Road

1. Present Road Location

21. The project road starts from T-Junction SH-75 Dabra city at Km 0 (25°52'46.25"N Latitude, 78°19'28.92"E Longitude and ends at Km 62.4 at Nerver Village (Latitude 25°39'26.99"N, 77°54'51.28"E Longitude). Dabra-Bhitarwar-Harsi Road (SH-6) (“The Project Road”) is situated in northern -eastern part of Madhya Pradesh State having a total length of 62.4Kms.

2. Findings

22. A survey of the Subproject affected households was carried out along the road in the months of April 2014 by respective DPR Consultant. The census was carried out based upon the detailed design drawings prepared by the DPR Consultant. The main objective of the survey was to prepare an inventory of all the affected assets and affected households. Another objective of the survey was to estimate the extent of resettlement impacts due to the Subproject implementation and to prepare a Resettlement Plan accordingly for compensating and providing necessary assistance to the eligible affected people based on ADB guidelines and prevailing law of India. The affected families were interviewed in the Subproject corridor by using structured questionnaire and discussions with the APs and other local people. During census survey it was observed that there will be no permanent impact on any assets but there will be partially impact on residential as well commercial structures within built up area with 5.5 meters width of the single lane carriageway including hard shoulders and side drain in built up areas.

23. Along with census survey of affected households, socioeconomic survey (20% sample) was carried out in project area to understand social and economical scenario of the project area in the month of May 2014. Poverty and Social Analysis report has been prepared and submitted to ADB.

24. I.D. Consultants, responsible for Dabra – Bhitarwar – Harsi Road of Gwalior and Shivpuri districts as DPR Consultant, conducted social and environmental survey, public consultation in project area during May 1 to 4, 2014. During assessing “Temporary Disruption of Livelihood”, the survey team observed 13 shops from Bhitarwar town which will be temporarily affected and will loss income during construction period.

25. During field visit to this sub project area by PPTA Consultants (Social and Environmental) and respective DPR Consultant on May 5, 2014, along with MPRDC officials it was confirmed that there is no permanent or partial impact on any asset in this road section but there will be “Temporary Disruption of Livelihood” during construction period.

26. Since there is no permanent or partial impact on any asset, it is decided to prepare a due diligence report for this section of road. Table B.1 details the summary of findings:

Table B.1: Resettlement Impact Nature of impact Magnitude of impact Number of houses to be displaced No houses exist within ROW in built up and open area, therefore there are no resettlement issues related with housing. Number of Directly Affected Persons (AP’s) There are no directly affected persons.

Nature of impact Magnitude of impact Loss of Agricultural Area / Cropland There is no agriculture land require for improvement of existing road, therefore no loss of agricultural area / cropland. Loss of Orchards There are no losses of orchards. Loss of structures / buildings There is no loss of any structure / building. Loss of individual and community Temporary impact on income of (13) road side livelihoods businesses. There are no community losses of livelihood. Damage or disturbance to public utility. Total 56 telephone / electric polls will be power relocated. 8 hand pumps supplying drinking water require relocation. Loss of grazing and fishing activities There is no loss of grazing and fishing activity. Loss of community properties There is no loss of community property Government property No Government property loss Government property No Government property loss Indigenous People There is no impact on Indigenous People Project Awareness Majority community beneficiaries are aware of the project. Gender Impacts During the discussion with community, especially with women it was observed that women’s status is considered to be below that of men. They have low participation in decision making for socioeconomic activities. Resettlement Budget Not applicable Implementation Schedule Not applicable Monitoring and Evaluation The Monitoring & Evaluation activities of this sub-project will be limited to monitoring the implementation of construction. It will be ensured that the contractors include the employment of local labor force in the construction and post construction activities (Appendix 6: Internal Monitoring (People’s awareness and feedback).

27. The Project falls in category C, therefore no resettlement plan is required as there is no private land acquisition or acquisition of other assets. There is no displacement of people and there is no loss of permanent income is caused by sub project.

28. Temporary Disruption of Livelihood: there are total 13 small roadside shops (business) from 5 villages which will be temporarily affected during civil work activity for a period of not more than 30 days. They will not suffer any physical displacement. Construction of proper drainage may temporarily restrict full access. Following table shows profile of these shops / owners, their income etc.

Table B.2: Temporary Disruption of Livelihood profile Village/ Name of the Type of Ownership Age and Total Monthly Monthly town shop owner business status cast members income expenditure of the (Rs) (Rs) family 1 Mr. Rajendra Cloth Rented 38 years 05 10,000 10,000 Yadav shop (OBC) 2 Mr. Hazari Jewelry Rented 35 years 03 10,000 8,000 Rawat shop (OBC) 3 Mr. Lakhan Jewelry Rented 32 years 05 20,000 20,000 Soni shop (OBC) 4 Mr. Sonu Ice cream Rented 22 years 05 7,000 7,000 Rupchandani shop (OBC) 5 Mr. Sunil Shoes Rented 35 years 04 6,000 6,000 Kumar shop (OBC) 6 Om Prakash Cloth Owner 70 years 08 15,000 15,000 Rajak shop (OBC) 7 Ram Swaroop Shoes Owner 74 years 09 40,000 40,000 Yadav Shop (OBC) 8 Balram Cloth Rented 35 years 06 35,000 35,000 Shivhare shop (General) 9 Nand Kumar Cloth Owner 56 years 06 20,000 20,000 Agrawal shop (OBC) 10 Mahendra Cloth Owner 50 years 04 15,000 15,000 tiwari shop (General) 11 Pawan Kumar Jewelry Owner 44 years 05 15,000 15,000 Swarnkar shop (General) 12 Kanchan Café Owner 30 years 05 10,000 10,000 Batham (SC) 13 Komal Ojha Iron/steel Squatter 44, OBC 05 10000 5000 repair shop OBC: Other Backward Class, SC: Scheduled Cast

3. Public Consultation, Disclosure and Information Dissemination

a. Public Consultation

29. During socioeconomic survey of project area, public consultation was arranged on April 30, 2014, in village Kariawatti of Bhitarwar Block of Gwalior district and on May 1, 2014 in village Belgadha of Narvar Block of Shivpuri district (Appendix B.2: scanned copy of list of participants and signatures and Appendix B.3: public consultation photographs). During public consultation focus was mainly given on project details, benefits of the project etc. Following is the profile of public consultation:

30. Subsequent to the transect walks, the PIUs with help of DPR Consultant conducted formal consultation with all those persons likely to get temporarily disrupted and loss income for the period of construction activity as a result of the road improvement. Public Consultation was held at village level attended by the village community including all the temporarily affected persons, and the PIU officials and representatives of DPR Consultants. During the conduct of the transect walks, all temporarily disrupted shops and business were identified, fully consulted.

31. Public Consultation process in village Bhitarwar: Bhitarwar is the only village of the project road where there is temporary disruption of livelihood; therefore public consultation was conducted in this village on June 7, 2014 at. Assistant General Manager, MPRDC and representatives of DPR Consultant facilitated the process. In the beginning AGM MPRDC, introduced about project and role of MPRDC and ADB. Total 19 people including 13 shop owners participated in the consultation process. After explaining about the project details, people were asked to give their views. Following is the summary of discussion:

Issues raised / discussed Issues MPRDC Action raised by To be Taken whom Wants road to be constructed that will lead development Akash Tiwari Contracting of the town and area. It will also generated new being tendered opportunities for education for the children of the town. soon. Supports development of the road but at the same time Gaurav Soni Design has been stresses to avoid demolition of the houses/shops. He said done in a way to all people will extend support for the construction of the avoid demolition broad. Development of the road will lead to better services of Shankarlal Agreed and health/hospitals. At present, if someone gets seriously ill, noted it takes a lot of time to take him to nearby hospital at district level. Once road is constructed, it will help a lot in female Jyoti Agreed and education. At present, many girls do not go to Agrawal noted school/college because of bad road condition and time to reach school. At present because of poor road condition, it is very Smt Shanit Agreed and difficult to take pregnant women to nearby hospital for Devi noted delivery. The improved road will definitely save a lot of time in taking women to hospital and with more comfort. Development of this road is top priority of the citizen of Deepak Agreed and this town. This will lead to overall development of the noted town. We all ready to extend to support for road development at our level. Emphasized the need for construction of concrete drain Ashok Drains have along the road Kumar been designed and will be built. Emphasized the maintenance Development of road will help a lot in the business, Sunil Kumar particularly small businessman. Development of road will make it easy to travel other Neeraj Agreed and cities/towns/district in shorter time and with comfort. noted Hence road should be constructed at the earliest. We are hearing this news of development of this road Kashi ram Agreed and since so many years/decades but nothing happened till noted date. If road is constructed now, it will benefit us and generations to come. It is important to make sure that quality construction Vijay Rawat Agreed and should be done, road should have long life and it should noted 24

Issues raised / discussed Issues MPRDC Action raised by To be Taken whom not be deteriorated soon. Good quality road is very important for the development of Mohit Rawat Agreed and the town, employment and for agriculture as well. Hence, noted road should be constructed at the earliest without any further delay. Road should be developed taking into account of benefit Lakhan Agreed and all. It is also important to make road safe particularly for Shakar noted children and older persons. He strongly supports road construction, ready to give his Rajendra Agreed and part of premises too. Feels that road construction will yadav noted increase his business and it will be easy to travel to nearby area in shorter time.

He also feels that road to be developed at the earliest. It Hazari Agreed and will help in his business at the same time schooling will be Rawat noted easy for his children. He feels that road to be developed. It will generate new Pawan Agreed and opportunities for business. Time saving is also important Kumar noted criteria for him if road is constructed.

Table B.3: Public Consultation Profile Sr. no Name of village Block / District Number of participants Date 1 Kiriyawati Bhitarwar / Gwalior 11 30/04/2014 2 Belgadha Narvar / Shivpuri 14 01/05/2014 3 Bhitarwar Bhitarwar / Gwalior 19 07/06/2014 Total 44

32. Subsequent to the transect walks, the PIUs with help of DPR Consultant conducted formal consultation with all those persons likely to get temporarily disrupted and loss income for the period of construction activity as a result of the road improvement. Public Consultation was held at village level attended by the village community including all the temporarily affected persons, and the PIU officials and representatives of DPR Consultants. During the conduct of the transect walks, all temporarily disrupted shops and business were identified and fully consulted.

Appendix B. 1: Grievance Redress Committee temporarily formed at State (MPRDC) and Divisional level.

GRIEVANCE REDRESS COMMITTEE (STATE LEVEL) MPRDC, BHOPAL (Temporary)

Sr. Name of the Designation Address Mobile / email No member 1 Mr. Mehra G. P. Chief Engineer 16 – A, Mob: Arera Hills, Bhopal - [email protected] 462011 2 Mr. Chaturvedi General 16 – A, Mob: P.K. Manager Arera Hills, Bhopal [email protected] 3 Mr. Rajendra Deputy General 16 – A, Mob: Khade Manager Arera Hills, Bhopal [email protected] 4 Mr. Deepak Manager 16 – A, Mob: Pandye (Environment Arera Hills, and Social Unit) Bhopal [email protected] 5 Mr. L.K. Dubey Superintendent Office of 0998 1050 208 Engineer (PWD) Engineering Bhopal Chief (PWD) Bhopal

GRIEVANCE REDRESS COMMITTEE (DIVISIONAL LEVEL), GWALIOR DIVISION, MPRDC

Sr. Name of the member Designation Address Mobile / email No 1 Mr. Rajeev Divisional 0/o Chief Engineer 0751 – 2235297 Shrivastawa Manager North Zhon (N/Z), +91 9826019619 PWD Thatipur, Gwalior. [email protected] 2 Mr. Pankaj Oza Assistant 0/o Chief Engineer 0751 – 2235297 General North Zhon (N/Z), [email protected] Manager PWD Thatipur, Gwalior 3 Mr. Mohd. Qamrul Manager 0/o Chief Engineer 0751 – 2235297 Huda Khan North Zhon (N/Z), [email protected] PWD Thatipur, Gwalior 4 Mr. S.K. Rajoria Sub Divisional 0982 6363 820 Officer, PWD

Appendix B.2: Scanned copies of list of participants with signature

Village Kariyawati

Village Belgadha

Village Bhitarwar – June 7, 2014

Appendix B.3: Public Consultation Photographs

Public Consultation – Kariyavati village Public Consultation – Belgadha village

Public Consultation – Village Bhitarwar Public Consultation – Village Bhitarwar

Appendix B.4: Profile of Women Headed Households

Village Category Name of head Caste Family Monthly Source of members income income Kariyawati WHH Smt. Manju General 3 1200.00 Stitching shop Belgadha WHH Smt. Kaliya Bai OBC 2 2000.00 Agriculture Rawat Harsi WHH Smt. Shahsi Kala General 4 900.00 Fruit Stall Devorikala WHH Bhagwati Rawat OBC 3 1400.00 Vegetable shop Belgadha WHH Kaliya Bai Rawat OBC 2 2000.00 Agriculture Kairuwa WHH Shanti SC 4 3000.00 Labor WHH Sona SC 6 3000.00 Labor WHH Sharda SC 4 2800.00 Labor Total 6 28

C. Mahua-Chuwahi Road

1. Present Road Location

33. This Project road starts from Mahua (Existing Km 300+000 & Design Km 297.700) at 3- arm junction (RHS direction goes to Sarai) and passes through Niwas, Nigrie, Tikri, Kamchhad, Majhigawan, Madwas, Jogi Pahadi, Siraula, Khadaura, Majholi and ends to Chuwahi (Existing Km 349+060 & Design Km 346.600). The end point of this section is linked with Beohari - Sidhi Road, SH- 55. The Total Length of road is 49.060 Kms (Existing) and 48.900 Kms (Design). The alignment is single lane having width of 3-3.75 m only with poor stretches in most of the lengths.

2. Location Map and Binderies

3. Findings

34. During field visit to this sub project area by PPTA Consultants (Social and Environmental) along with ADB mission, MPRDC officials and respective DPR Consultant on April 24, 2014, it was observed that there is no permanent impact on any asset in this road section but there will be partial impact on commercial structures in village Mazholi. It is also noticed that there will be Temporary Disruption of Livelihood during civil work activity in village Madvas and Mazholi. Table C.1 details the summary of findings:

Table C.1: Resettlement Impact Nature of impact Magnitude of impact Number of houses to be displaced No houses exist within ROW in built up and open area, therefore there are no resettlement issues related with housing. Number of Directly Affected Persons There are no directly affected persons. (AP’s) Loss of Agricultural Area / Cropland There is no agriculture land require for improvement of existing road, therefore no loss of agricultural area / cropland. Loss of Orchards There are no losses of orchards. Loss of structures / buildings There is no loss of any structure / building. 32

Nature of impact Magnitude of impact Loss of individual and community Temporary impact on income of 4 road side Livelihoods businesses. There are no community losses of livelihood. Damage or disturbance to public utility. Total 163 telephone / electric polls will be power relocated. 26 hand pumps supplying drinking water require relocation (Ref. DPR). Loss of grazing and fishing activities There is no loss of grazing and fishing activity. Loss of community properties There is no loss of community property Government property No Government property loss Government property No Government property loss Indigenous People There is no impact on Indigenous People Project Awareness Majority community beneficiaries are aware of the project. Gender Impacts During the discussion with community, especially with women it was observed that women’s status is considered to be below that of men. They have low participation in decision making for socioeconomic activities. Resettlement Budget Not applicable Implementation Schedule Not applicable Monitoring and Evaluation The Monitoring & Evaluation activities of this subproject will be limited to monitoring the implementation of construction. It will be ensured that the contractors include the employment of local labor force in the construction and post construction activities. A separate internal monitoring framework is designed (Appendix 6: Internal Monitoring (People’s awareness and feedback).

35. The Project falls in Category C, therefore no resettlement plan is required as there is no private land acquisition or acquisition of other assets. There is no displacement of people and there is no loss of permanent income is caused by sub project.

36. Temporary Disruption of Livelihood: There are total 4 small roadside shops (business) from village Madvas which will be temporarily affected during civil work activity for a period of not more than 30 days. They will not suffer any physical displacement. Construction of proper drainage may temporarily restrict full access. Following table shows profile of these shops / owners, their income etc.

Table C.2: Temporary Disruption of Livelihood profile Village/ Name of the Type of Ownership Age and Total Monthly Monthly town shop owner business status cast members income expenditure of the (Rs) (Rs) family 1 Mr. Tailor Owner 34 age / 04 5,000 5,000 Kamleshkumar OBC Sakhet 2 Mr. Mansukhlal Cycle Owner 42 age / 08 6,000 6,000 Jaiswal Shop OBC

Village/ Name of the Type of Ownership Age and Total Monthly Monthly town shop owner business status cast members income expenditure of the (Rs) (Rs) family 3 Mr. Niraj Jaiswal Pan Shop Owner 28 age / 05 4,000 4,000 OBC 4 Mr. Rajendra Hair Owner 32 age / 12 5,000 5,000 saloon OBC Total 29 OBC: Other Backward Class, SC: Scheduled Cast

4. Public Consultation, Disclosure and Information Dissemination

a. Public Consultation

37. During socioeconomic survey of project area, public consultation was arranged on May 3, 2014, in village Mahua of Devsar Block of Singrauli district, on May 4, 2014 in village Nigrai of Devasar Block of Singrauli district, on May 5, 2014 in village Madvas of Mazholi Block of Sidhi district, in village Mazholi of Mazholi Block of Sidhi district and Nivas of Devasar Block of Singrauli district (Appendix C.2: scanned copy of list of participants and signatures and Appendix C.3: public consultation photographs). During public consultation focus was mainly given on project details, benefits of the project etc.

38. On June 6, 2014, a public consultation was carried out with the aim to obtain the views and opinions of owner of businesses that will suffer temporary livelihood disruptions. All four owners expressed that they will be happy to forgo the small assistance in return for construction of proper draining which will greatly benefit their businesses during rains. It was also focused at obtaining the viewpoints of residents and road users on how best the construction works should be carried out in order to minimize any nuisance during construction period. Table C.3 details the consultation profile.

Table C.3: Public Consultation Profile Sr. no Name of village Block / District Number of participants Date 1 Gonara Chitrangi / Singrauli 26 (all male) 08/05/2014 2 Gangi Chitrangi / Singrauli 23 (20 male + 3 female) 08/05/2014 3 Dudhmania Chitrangi / Singrauli 16 (all male) 08/05/2014 4 Chitrangi Chitrangi / Singrauli 27 ( all male) 09/05/2014 Chitrangi 27 (24 male + 3 female) 20/06/2014 5 Podu (Gonara) Chitrangi / Singrauli 15 (all male) 07/06/2014 Total 134 (128 male + 6 female)

b. Community’s Overall Response to the Proposed Sub-Project

39. The major concern of the community is of bad condition of existing road. Some residents also demanded employment of local persons during the construction activity period. The local communities’ responses to the subproject are summarized as follows:

a. Project Awareness: The majority of the beneficiary, especially men communities were found aware of the Project activities.

b. Effects on business and living conditions: Almost all of the community expect a positive impact of the sub-project in terms of improved living standards.

c. Job Opportunities: The communities requested to be hired for unskilled to semi-skilled jobs during the construction and operation of the project activities. In such case, priority will be given to women headed households identified during socioeconomic survey (Appendix C.4: Profile of Women Headed HH).

d. Provision of Drainage: almost all the villagers reside along the road has made request of appropriate and effective drainage system.

e. Road Safety: there is a possibility of accidents due to better quality of road; therefore road safety measures are necessary.

f. Road Quality: the quality of road must be up to standards and road should be constructed within given time.

Appendix C. 1: Grievance Redress Committee temporarily formed at State (MPRDC) and Divisional level.

GRIEVANCE REDRESS COMMITTEE (STATE LEVEL) MPRDC, BHOPAL (Temporary)

Sr. Name of the Designation Address Mobile / email No member 1 Mr. G. P. Mehra Chief Engineer 16 – A, Arera Mob: Hills, Bhopal - 462011 [email protected] 2 Mr. Chaturvedi General 16 – A, Arera Mob:9827328056 P.K. Manager Hills, Bhopal [email protected] 3 Mr. Rajendra Deputy General 16 – A, Arera Mob:9406902208 Khade Manager Hills, Bhopal [email protected] 4 Mr. Deepak Manager 16 – A, Arera Mob: 9424402217 Pandye (Environment Hills, Bhopal and Social Unit) [email protected] 5 Mr. L.K. Dubey Superintendent Office of 0998 1050 208 Engineer (PWD) Engineering Bhopal Chief (PWD) Bhopal

GRIEVANCE REDRESS COMMITTEE (DIVISIONAL LEVEL), REWA DIVISION, MPRDC

Sr. Name of the member Designation Address Mobile / email No 1 Mr. Bairagi R. S. Divisional Rewa Division 07662 – 231005 Manager (2), 14/397, +91 942549159 Arun Nagar, Rewa [email protected] 2 Mr. Ramakant Assistant Rewa Division 07662 – 231005 Dwivedi General (2), 14/397, +91 777 1895 025 Manager Arun Nagar, Rewa 3 Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh Sub Divisional 0999 3144 760 (Chitrangi – Kasar Officer, PWD road) 4 Mr. Mangaleshwar Sub Divisional 0900 9394 135 Dwivedi (Mahua – Officer, PWD Chuwahi Road)

Appendix C.2: Scanned copy of list of participants with signature

1. Mahua (May 3, 2014)

Mahua (June 15, 2014)

2. Nigri (May 4, 2014)

Nigari (June 16, 2014)

3. Madvas (May 5, 2014)

Madvas (June 18, 2014)

4. Mazholi (May 5, 2014)

5. Nivas (May 5, 2014)

Nivas (June 17, 2014)

6. Madvas (June 6, 2014)

Appendix C.3: Public Consultation Photographs

Public Consultation – Mahua village Public Consultation – Nigri village

Public Consultation – Madvas village Public Consultation – Mazholi village

Public Consultation – Nivas village

Photos of Public Consultation held on June 6, 2014

Appendix C.4: Profile of Women Headed Households

Village Category Name of head Caste Family Monthly Source of members income income Nigari WHH SmtSugarnua OBC 7 5000 Business WHH SmtJanki ST 5 2300 Labour WHH SmtGendupanika OBC 6 4000 Labour WHH SmtButali ST 6 4000 Labour WHH SmtTerasiya OBC 5 4000 Labour WHH SmtJaimaniyaSa OBC 4 4000 Business hu WHH SmtKalawati SC 3 2000 Labour WHH SmtLeelawati Sc 1 700 Bamboo work WHH SmtSunita ST 4 12000 Salary WHH SmtGutaiya ST 5 11000 Salary Tikri WHH SmtMukhiya Sc 1 600 Pension WHH SmtChhotikewat OBC 4 3000 Labour WHH SmtAshasingh Gen 3 1000 AG WHH SmtManfer sc 3 2500 Labour WHH Smtkoushalya sc 3 2000 Labour Papal WHH Smtmeenagupta Gen 5 5000 Salary WHH Smt Ram pyari Gen 2 7000 Business/sa lary WHH Smt Ram bai OBC 2 2000 Labour WHH Smt Shiv poojan Gen 4 11000 Salary Mahuagaon WHH SmtGutaloo OBC 4 2000 Labour WHH SmtRamrati OBC 1 900 Labour WHH SmtMakhani OBC 1 1000 Labour WHH SmtGutaiya OBC 5 3000 Labour WHH SmtNarbadiya ST 6 3150 Labour WHH SmtSundarbai OBC 6 4500 Labour WHH SmtRankali OBC 3 3600 Labour WHH SmtGulliSahu OBC 3 4000 Labour WHH SmtShayamwati OBC 1 800 Labour WHH SmtSukarwati OBC 6 3000 Labour WHH SmtLeelawati OBC 4 2500 Labour Niwas WHH SmtMankumari Gen 1 1400 Labour WHH SmtSunita OBC 3 2000 Labour WHH SmtRamkali Gen 2 5000 Salary WHH SmtKalpana Gen 3 5000 Business/sa lary WHH SmtPargula OBC 4 2000 Labour Madwas WHH SmtRajwati SC 6 3000 Labour WHH Smt Anita kol SC 4 1500 Labour WHH SmtDulariya SC 5 3000 Labour WHH SmtManwati SC 4 3000 Labour WHH SmtBasntikol ST 4 3000 Labour WHH SmtSarojkali OBC 4 3000 AG Labour 53

Village Category Name of head Caste Family Monthly Source of members income income WHH SmtBitikol ST 4 3000 Labour WHH SmtKisamatiya SC 1 600 Pension WHH SmtSusheela OBC 6 3500 Labour WHH SmtShayamwati ST 6 4000 AG Labour WHH SmtRadha ST 4 3000 Labour WHH SmtSaroj OBC 1 3000 Labour WHH SmtShyamwati ST 2 3700 Labour WHH SmtLaxmi ST 3 3500 Labour Total 49

D. Ujjain-Maksi Road

1. Present Road Location

40. The project road takes off from the end point Rail Over Bridge located in Ujjain City with starting chainage as km 1/890 (23°11' N Latitude to 75°48' E Longitude) and terminates at Makshi on NH-3 Junction at Km. 38/230 (23°15' N Latitude to 76°08' E Longitude.). Ujjain- Makshi, (“Project Road”) situated at western part of Madhya Pradesh, which falls Dewas, Shajapur and Ujjain District has a total length of 36.34 Kilometres.

2. Location Map and Binderies

3. Findings

41. A survey of the Subproject affected households was carried out along the road in the months of May 2014 by respective DPR Consultant. The census was carried out based upon the detailed design drawings prepared by the DPR Consultants. The main objective of the survey was to prepare an inventory of all the affected assets and affected households. Another objective of the survey was to estimate the extent of resettlement impacts due to the Subproject implementation and to prepare a Resettlement Plan accordingly for compensating and providing necessary assistance to the eligible affected people based on ADB guidelines and prevailing law of India. The affected families were interviewed in the Subproject corridor by using structured questionnaire and discussions with the APs and other local people. During census survey it was observed that there will be no permanent impact on any assets but there will be partially impact on residential as well commercial structures within built up area with 13 meters width of the two lane carriageway including hard shoulders and side drain.

42. Along with census survey of affected households, socioeconomic survey (20% sample) was carried out in project area to understand social and economical scenario of the project area 55 in the month of May 2014. Poverty and Social Analysis report has been prepared and submitted to ADB.

43. SAI Consulting Engineers responsible for Ujjain – Makshi road as DPR Consultants, conducted social and environmental survey, public consultation in project area during May 12 to 18, 2014. Team observed 17 shops from village Patpala, Vijayganj Mandi, Kaitha, Pandyakhedi, and Shankarpur (ward 40) of Ujjain Municipal Council which will be temporarily affected and will loss income during construction period.

44. During field visit to this sub project area by PPTA Consultants (Social and Gender Expert) and respective DPR Consultant on June 5, 2014, along with MPRDC officials it was reconfirmed that there is no permanent or partial impact on any asset in this road section but there will be “Temporary Disruption of Livelihood” during civil work activity in village Patpala, Vijayganj Mandi, Kaitha, Pandyakhedi, and Shankarpur (ward 40) of Ujjain Municipal Council.

45. Since there is no permanent or partial impact on any asset, it is decided to prepare a due diligence report for this section of road. Table D.1 details the summary of findings:

Table D.1: Resettlement Impact Nature of impact Magnitude of impact Number of houses to be displaced No houses exist within RoW in built up and open area, therefore there are no resettlement issues related with housing. Number of Directly Affected Persons There are no directly affected persons. (AP’s) Loss of Agricultural Area / Cropland There is no agriculture land require for improvement of existing road, therefore no loss of agricultural area / cropland. Loss of Orchards There are no losses of orchards. Loss of structures / buildings There is no loss of any structure / building. Loss of individual and community Temporary impact on income of (17) road side livelihoods businesses. There are no community losses of livelihood. Damage or disturbance to public utility Total 50 telephone / electric polls will be relocated. 8 hand pumps supplying drinking water require relocation. Loss of grazing and fishing activities There is no loss of grazing and fishing activity. Loss of community properties There is no loss of community property Government property No Government property loss Indigenous People There is no impact on Indigenous People Project Awareness Majority community, especially men beneficiaries are aware of the project. Gender Impacts During the discussion with community, especially with women it was observed that women’s status is considered to be below that of men. They have low participation in decision making for socioeconomic activities. Resettlement Budget Not applicable Implementation Schedule Not applicable Monitoring and Evaluation The Monitoring & Evaluation activities of this sub- 56

Nature of impact Magnitude of impact project will be limited to monitoring the implementation of construction. It will be ensured that the contractors include the employment of local labor force in the construction and post construction activities (Appendix 6: Internal Monitoring (People’s awareness and feedback). .

46. The Project falls in Category C, therefore no resettlement plan is required as there is no private land acquisition or acquisition of other assets. There is no displacement of people and there is no loss of permanent income is caused by sub project.

47. Temporary Disruption of Livelihood: there are total 17 small roadside shops (business) from village Madvas which will be temporarily affected during civil work activity for a period of not more than 30 days. They will not suffer any physical displacement. Construction of proper drainage may temporarily restrict full access. Following table shows profile of these shops / owners, their income etc.

Table D.2: Temporary Disruption of Livelihood profile Village/ town Name of the Type of Ownership Age Total Monthly Monthly shop owner business status and members income expenditure cast of the (Rs) (Rs) family Pandyakhedi Mr. Narayan Vegetable Vendor 28 / 6 6,000 5,000 (4) Chawada OBC Mr. Angat Fruit Vendor 45 / 6 6,000 5,000 Ramkawar OBC Mr. Jagdish Fruit Vendor 25 / 5 5,000 4,500 Rajoria OBC Mr. Amrit Lala Pan shop Squatter 48 / 6 6,000 4,500 OBC Shankarpur Mr. Raja Jar Tea shop Squatter 45 / 5 6,000 5,000 (1) OBC Patpala Mr. Hemraj Small Squatter 25 / 4 6,000 5,000 (4) Kumar business OBC Mr. Lakhan Hair Squatter 23 / 4 5,000 4,000 Verma saloon OBC Mr. Dinesh Small Encroacher 54 / 10 5,000 4,000 Mandloi shop OBC Mr. Kamal Sing Vulcanizati Squatter 35 / 5 8,000 7,000 Sisodia on OBC Vijayganj Mr. Kashiram Cobbler Squatter 50 / SC 4 5,000 4,000 Mandi Mr. Parvesh Cobbler Squatter 35 / SC 7 5,000 4,000 (3) Dugaria Mr. Arun Fruit Vendor 35 / 6 7,000 6,000 Pahadiya OBC Kaitha Mr. Prem Cobbler Squatter 50 / SC 10 5,000 5,000 (5) Narayan Mr. Sunil Vegetable Vendor 22 / 6 6,000 5,000 Kewat OBC Mr. Vegetable Vendor 40 / 5 5,000 5,000 Rameshchandr OBC Mr. Irfan Kazi Flower Squatter 28 / 5 5,000 4,000 57

Village/ town Name of the Type of Ownership Age Total Monthly Monthly shop owner business status and members income expenditure cast of the (Rs) (Rs) family OBC Mr. Ram Tea stall Encroacher 42 / 6 10,000 8,000 Rathod OBC OBC: Other Backward Class, SC: Scheduled Cast

4. Public Consultation, Disclosure and Information Dissemination

a. Public Consultation

48. During socioeconomic survey of project area, public consultation was arranged between May 12 to 17, 2014, in village Pandyakhedi, Makshi, Digroda, Pawasa, Kastha, Vijaygarj, and Tajpur. During public consultation focus was mainly given on project details, benefits of the project etc.). Following is the profile of public consultation (Appendix D.2: scanned copy of list of participants and signature and Appendix D.3: public consultation photographs).

49. On June 6, 2014, a public consultation was carried out with the aim to obtain the views and opinions of owner of businesses that will suffer temporary livelihood disruptions. All four owners expressed that they will be happy to forgo the small assistance in return for construction of proper draining which will greatly benefit their businesses during rains. It was also focused at obtaining the viewpoints of residents and road users on how best the construction works should be carried out in order to minimize any nuisance during construction period. Table D.3 details the consultation profile.

50. Subsequent to the transect walks, the PIUs with help of DPR Consultant conducted formal consultation with all those persons likely to get temporarily disrupted and loss income for the period of construction activity as a result of the road improvement. Public Consultation was held at village level attended by the village community including all the temporarily affected persons, and the PIU officials and representatives of DPR Consultants. During the conduct of the transect walks, all temporarily disrupted shops and business were identified and fully consulted.

b. Community’s Overall Response to the Proposed Sub-Project

51. The major concern of the community is of bad condition of existing road. Some residents also demanded employment of local persons during the construction activity period. The local communities’ responses to the subproject are summarized as follows:

52. Public Consultation process in village Patpala, Vijayaganj Mandi and Kaitha: public consultation in three villages started at 10.30am on June 6, 2014. Mr. L.C. Kurethia (AGM), Mr. Dhyansing Moyal (Manager) of MPRDC, Ujjain division, Mr. Chandrashekar sing (Social and Environment expert, SAI) participated in public consultation. First public consultation held in village Patpala in which 7 people participated, second was in village Vijayaganj Mandi in which 12 people participated and third was in village Kaitha in which 9 people participated. In the beginning AGM MPRDC, introduced about project and role of MPRDC and ADB. After explaining about the project details, people were asked to give their views. Following is the summary of discussion:

S. No Issues Raised /discussed Action taken by MPRDC officer/ consultant 1 How much of road width will be in 8 m including drainage and safety margin. Built-up area. 2 Any impact along road side shop There will not be any impact along road side commercial as well as residential structures, only temporary disruption of livelihood may occur during construction phase ,this period may be less than 4 weeks due to using concrete surfacing 3 When construction of road will start. When financial assistance and other clearance will be received. 4 Drainage problem during rainy Provision of 0.5 m both side drainage in season proposed road will improve the drainage problem. 5 New road should be constructing as We will try to proceed at the earliest. soon as possible. 6 Condition of existing road is not Proposed widening & strengthening of the good, as per the villagers there are road will provides better level of service in so many pot holes on the term of improving riding quality and smooth carriageway, it cause discomfort, traffic flow. chances of accident as well as it takes long time to travel from Ujjain to Maksi.

Table D.3: Public Consultation Profile Sr. no Name of village Block / District Number of participants Date 1 Pandyakhedi Ujjain / Ujjain 13 17/05/2014 2 Makshi Makshi / Sajapur 17 14/05/2014 3 Digroda Tonkhurd / Dewas 17 14/05/2014 4 Pawasa Ujjain / Ujjain 11 15/05/2014 5 Kaitha Tarana / Ujjain 14 6 Vijayganj Mandi Dewas / Devas 14 16/05/2014 7 Tajpur Ujjan / Ujjain 16 16/05/2014 8 Patpala Ujjain / Ujjain 07 06/06/2014 9 Vijayaganj Mandi Dewas / Devas 12 06/06/2014 10 Kaitha Tarana / Ujjain 09 06/06/2014 Total 130 59

Appendix D.1: Grievance Redress Committee temporarily formed at State (MPRDC) and Divisional level.

GRIEVANCE REDRESS COMMITTEE (STATE LEVEL) MPRDC, BHOPAL (Temporary) Sr. No Name of the Designation Address Mobile / email member 1 Mr. GP Mehra Chief Engineer 16 – A, Mob: Arera Hills, Bhopal - [email protected] 462011 2 Mr. Chaturvedi General 16 – A, Mob: P.K. Manager Arera Hills, Bhopal [email protected] 3 Mr. Rajendra Deputy 16 – A, Mob: Khade General Arera Hills, Manager Bhopal [email protected] 4 Mr. Deepak Manager 16 – A, Mob: Pandye (Environment Arera Hills, and Social Bhopal [email protected] Unit) 5 Mr. L.K. Dubey Superintendent Office of 0998 1050 208 Engineer Engineering (PWD) Bhopal Chief (PWD) Bhopal

GRIEVANCE REDRESS COMMITTEE (DIVISIONAL LEVEL), UJJAIN DIVISION, MPRDC

Sr. No Name of the Designation Address Mobile / email member 1 Mr. Suryavanshi A.L Divisional 90 – B, Sidhi 0734 – 2554853 Manager Colony, Ujjain +91 9826021813 [email protected] 2 Mr. L.C. Kurethia Assistant 90 – B, Sidhi 0734 – 2554853 General Manager Colony, Ujjain 3 Mr. Komal Bhutra Sub Divisional 0990 7262 555 Officer, PWD

Appendix D.2: Scanned copies of list of participants (Public Consultation) with signature

Village Pandyakhedi

Village Makshi

Village Digroda

Village Pawasa

Village Kaitha

Village Vijayganj

Village Tajpur

Public Consultation held on June 6, 2014

Village Patpala

Village Vijayganj Mandi

Village Kaitha

Appendix D.3: Public Consultation Photographs

Public Consultation – Patpala Village Public Consultation - Pandeyakedi

Public Consultation – Kaitha village Public Consultation –Vijayganj Mandi

Public Consultation – Tajpur Village Public Consultation – Makshi Village

Photos from Public Consultation held on June 6, 2014

Public Consultation – Village Kaitha Signing MOU by Mr. Kasi Ram in village Vijayganj

Signing MOU by Mr. Dinesh Mandloi in Signing MOU by Mr. Sunil Kewat in village village Patpala Kaitha

Public Consultation – Village Patpala Public Consultation – Village Vijayganj

Appendix D.4: Profile of Women Headed Households

Village Category Name of head Caste Family Monthly Source of members income Rs income Pawasa WHH Smt. Bhagawati OBC 6 6,000 Housewife Rathod Vijayganj WHH Smt. Urmilal OBC 4 5,000 Business Mandi WHH Smt. Ganga Bai SC 9 8,000 Housewife Kaytha WHH Smt. Premlatadevi General 8 10,000 Business WHH Smt. Manu Varma OBC 7 6,000 Business WHH Smt. Lalita OBC 4 5,000 Business Total 6 38