PLANNING REGULATORY BOARD Date 4Th April 2014 Report of The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PLANNING REGULATORY BOARD Date 4Th April 2014 Report of The To the Chairman and Members of the PLANNING REGULATORY BOARD Date 4th April 2014 Report of the Director of Planning and Regeneration Service ITEM NO. SUBJECT 1 Ref: RB2014/0271 Page No. Courtesy Consultation for use of land for staff, contractor and 96 coach parking accommodation including ancillary uses and provisions of a security cabin and barriers to the coach park site at Alsing Road, Sheffield for MSC Property Intermediate Holdings Limited. ROTHERHAM METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL PLANNING REGULATORY BOARD PLANNING AND REGENERATION SERVICE REPORT TO COMMITTEE 3rd APRIL 2014 File Ref: RB2014/0271 Courtesy Consultation for use of land for staff, contractor and coach parking accommodation including ancillary uses and provisions of a security cabin and barriers to the coach park site at Alsing Road, Sheffield for MSC Property Intermediate Holdings Limited Recommendation : That Sheffield City Council be informed that the Council has no objections to the proposals. Background Rotherham MBC has been consulted on the above planning application submitted to Sheffield City Council. This is a ‘courtesy’ consultation as required due to the close proximity of Rotherham Borough to the application site. RMBC are invited to provide SCC with comments on the application and the impact of the proposal on Rotherham in terms of such planning related issues as the environment, flooding, traffic and the vitality / viability of Rotherham town centre. Site Description & Location The site is located to the north of Meadowhall Shopping Centre and is bounded by the railway line to the west, the M1 (Tinsley Viaduct) to the east and the River Don to the south. The site is bisected by Alsing Road. To the north of Alsing Road is a temporary staff car park (Staff Car Park B) and a coach park and temporary staff car park is located to the south. The site is relatively flat and is located within close proximity to the Meadowhall Interchange, located to the far south west of the site. The application is located less than 300 metres from the western boundary of Rotherham Metropolitan Borough’s administrative boundary which is on the north western side of the M1 Motorway (Tinsley Viaduct). Proposal The proposal seeks the use of the existing temporary staff and Coach Park for permanent staff, contractor and coach parking with a security hut, and safety barriers on the Coach Park. A Certificate of Lawful Development has already been approved which allows for the lawful use of coach parking spaces on this site. 33 coach parking spaces are currently laid out and are to be retained as part of the application. A total of 1,405 car parking spaces (including those already at the site) are to be provided across the site. The security hut and barrier gate will be located at the access to the Coach Park on the south-western boundary of the site. A Travel Plan, Transport Assessment and Flood Risk Assessment have all been submitted to Sheffield City Council for consideration. Consultations Streetpride (Transportation and Highways): Although they envisage there would be no significant impact on Rotherham’s highway network they have indicated that Sheffield City Council should address the following: • Re-routing of traffic to the site, anyone travelling from Rotherham might be tempted to use Meadowbank Road rather than Sheffield Road to access the new site. With the Tinsley Link due to be built, what effect will this parking have on traffic on the new road, will it interfere with Bus Rapid Transit? • Overall provision of parking, near to the centre will be increased by moving staff to the car park which only has overspill permission for 60 days a year. In addition they indicate the submitted Travel Plan and Transport Assessment do not consider the effect of relocating staff car parking to a location which will concentrate vehicle movements. Streetpride (Drainage): Consider there will be minimal impact on Rotherham in terms of flooding and drainage issues. Appraisal The main issues with the proposal affecting Rotherham would include the impact on traffic levels within the Borough and the impact on the general environment of the Borough’s residents. In terms of impact on the Borough’s highway network it is unlikely the proposed change of use would have a significant impact on Rotherham’s highway network. However, the Council’s Transportation and Highway department have raised some concerns about the potential impact the proposal will have on the Tinsley Link and the proposed Bus Rapid Transit route and it does not appear the submitted Travel Plan and Transport Assessment consider the effect of relocating the staff car park to a location which will concentrate vehicle movements. The above are issues which the Highways Engineer at Sheffield City Council will be assessing as part of the development. Therefore whilst the Council’s Transportation and Highway department have raised some concerns / issues, these are likely to be considered by their counterparts in Sheffield during the determination of the application and would not affect Rotherham’s highway network should the application be approved by Sheffield City Council. In view of the above despite the concerns raised it is considered that the proposed development is unlikely to have a material adverse impact on Rotherham’s highways. The nearest residential properties within the administrative boundary of Rotherham to the proposed site are approximately 400 metres to the north- east on Meadowbank Road. These properties are on the northern side of the busy Meadowbank Road and there is the dual-carriageway section of Meadowbank Road and the M1 motorway and Tinsley Viaduct between the site and these properties. Given the distance, land levels and presence of large road structures will ensure that these properties within Rotherham and their occupants are not adversely affected by the visual appearance of the site. The application site is located within Flood Zone 2 and Flood Zone 3 and the development is classed as “Less vulnerable” development which is appropriate for Flood Zones 2 and 3. The site is located within the Flood Warning area for Meadowhall and a fully developed Flood Warning and Evacuation Plan exists for the Shopping Centre. In terms of any additional impact on the environment of Rotherham, it is considered that as there is no proposal to alter levels or increase flows there would be minimal impact on Rotherham in terms of flooding. Conclusion Having regard to the above it is concluded that the impact of the development on Rotherham will be minimal given the nature of the work and the proposed use of the site. As such it is considered that RMBC should raise no objections to the proposals. .
Recommended publications
  • Sheffield City Council Place
    SHEFFIELD CITY COUNCIL PLACE REPORT TO CITY CENTRE SOUTH AND EAST PLANNING DATE 03/05/2011 AND HIGHWAYS COMMITTEE REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ITEM SUBJECT APPLICATIONS UNDER VARIOUS ACTS/REGULATIONS SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS SEE RECOMMENDATIONS HEREIN THE BACKGROUND PAPERS ARE IN THE FILES IN RESPECT OF THE PLANNING APPLICATIONS NUMBERED. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS N/A PARAGRAPHS CLEARED BY BACKGROUND PAPERS CONTACT POINT FOR Chris Heeley TEL 0114 2736329 ACCESS Lucy Bond NO: 0114 2734556 AREA(S) AFFECTED CATEGORY OF REPORT OPEN 2 Application No. Location Page No. 11/00821/FUL 271 Chesterfield Road Sheffield 6 S8 0RT 11/00812/CHU Players Sports Bar 125 West Street 12 City Centre Sheffield S1 4ER 11/00696/RG3 Land At South Side Of Road Between Train Tracks And River Rother 26 Station Road Halfway Sheffield 11/00596/FUL Curtilage Of 36 High Street Beighton 36 Sheffield S20 1EA 11/00588/CHU 26 - 30 Division Street Sheffield 47 S1 4GF 11/00557/FUL Wellington House 39 Wellington Street 57 Sheffield S1 4HF 11/00503/FUL 7 Rockingham Street Sheffield 73 S1 4EA 11/00427/FUL 30 Bellhouse Road Sheffield 87 S5 6HL 3 11/00394/FUL Plot V Europa View 95 Sheffield Business Park Phase I Sheffield 11/00389/FUL Prego Unit 7 103 The Plaza 8 Fitzwilliam Street Sheffield S1 4JB 11/00246/REM Land Between Lock Lane And 303 Sheffield Road 114 Tinsley Sheffield S9 2FY 11/00223/FUL Kelham Island Museum To Brooklyn Works Green Lane 124 Sheffield S3 8RY 10/04045/FUL Site Of 159 To 165 West Street 138 City Centre Sheffield S1 4EW 10/03699/RG3 Land Off Meadowhall
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Neighbourhoods Scrutiny and Policy
    SUCCESSFUL NEIGHBOURHOODS 9th July 2009 SCRUTINY AND POLICY DEVELOPMENT BOARD Closed Circuit Television 1. Introduction 1.1 This report presents to the Successful Neighbourhoods Scrutiny and Development Board with information to support discussions on: • The degree to which CCTV is situated on public and private land • The legal powers available to use CCTV in different scenario’s • The way in which the South Yorkshire Police and the City Council supervise CCTV’s use • The degree to which such systems have proved to be useful in deterring and detecting crime and anti-social behaviour • Ethics and civil liberty issues which restrain the use of CCTV on public and private land 1.2 This information is provided in respect of the City Council’s CCTV monitoring station only. 2. Background 2.1 The City Councils CCTV monitoring station receives images from 136 cameras situated around Sheffield City Centre and a number of inner City locations. The equipment is linked by fibre optic network and images are shared with the SWISS (Sheffield Wide Imaging Switching System) partners. Partners include South Yorkshire Police, Meadowhall, Supertram and Urban Traffic Control. The station also monitors a range of audio feeds including Pubwatch, CCRAC (City Centre Retailers against Crime) and Airwaves (Police Communications System). 2.2 The Monitoring Station also monitors Bus Lane traffic in the Wicker and Hillsborough areas and provides images recording contraventions to Urban Traffic Control. 3. The degree to which CCTV is situated on public and private land 3.1 Attached at Appendix A is list of camera’s and their locations within the City.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study : Tinsley Viaduct Scope of Work
    CASE STUDY : TINSLEY VIADUCT PROJECT INTRODUCTION Tinsley viaduct is a two-tier steel box girder viaduct which opened in 1968 as a key structure on the M1 motorway near Sheffield in Yorkshire. The M1 is one of the UK’s main motorway arteries and a key economic link between the north and south of England. The upper deck of the viaduct serves the M1 and the lower deck serves the A631 which is part of the strategic road network around Sheffield. The maintenance of Tinsley Viaduct is the responsibility of Highways England and sits in Area 12 where A- one+, a joint venture between Costain, Colas and Jacobs, has the maintenance framework contract. A key project within the maintenance programme in 2019 was the repair and resurfacing of both lanes of the A631. As one of the UK’s leading road infrastructure repair specialists, Metrail Construction Ltd was selected by A-one+ to carry out the bridge deck waterproofing and associated concrete repairs on the south bound carriageway. SCOPE OF WORK The contract awarded to Metrail covered the following scope of work on a total of 18,000sq m of deck and 1850sq m of walkway: • Remove existing waterproofing • Remove existing walkway surfacing • Scrape the main deck to remove any remaining surfacing and waterproofing • Identify and carry out concrete repairs prior to waterproofing • Apply waterproofing, including bond coat, with a proprietary waterproofing system • Apply combined waterproofing/high friction surfacing on the walkway. HEAD OFFICE : UNIT 13 STATION ROAD INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, HAILSHAM, EAST SUSSEX, BN27 2EY T: 01825 761360 REGIONAL OFFICE : BIG PICTURE HOUSE, PONTEFRACT ROAD, SNAITH, DN14 0DE T: 01405 808230 1 SCOTLAND OFFICE : MAXIM BUSINESS PARK, MAXIM 1 - 1ST FLOOR, 2 PARKLANDS WAY, MOTHERWELL, ML1 4WR T: 01417 397510 CASE STUDY : TINSLEY VIADUCT PROGRAMME The works required a traffic management scheme to be put in place to enable two-way traffic on the north bound carriageway which then allowed a full closure of the south bound carriageway.
    [Show full text]
  • South Yorkshire
    INDUSTRIAL HISTORY of SOUTH RKSHI E Association for Industrial Archaeology CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 6 STEEL 26 10 TEXTILE 2 FARMING, FOOD AND The cementation process 26 Wool 53 DRINK, WOODLANDS Crucible steel 27 Cotton 54 Land drainage 4 Wire 29 Linen weaving 54 Farm Engine houses 4 The 19thC steel revolution 31 Artificial fibres 55 Corn milling 5 Alloy steels 32 Clothing 55 Water Corn Mills 5 Forging and rolling 33 11 OTHER MANUFACTUR- Windmills 6 Magnets 34 ING INDUSTRIES Steam corn mills 6 Don Valley & Sheffield maps 35 Chemicals 56 Other foods 6 South Yorkshire map 36-7 Upholstery 57 Maltings 7 7 ENGINEERING AND Tanning 57 Breweries 7 VEHICLES 38 Paper 57 Snuff 8 Engineering 38 Printing 58 Woodlands and timber 8 Ships and boats 40 12 GAS, ELECTRICITY, 3 COAL 9 Railway vehicles 40 SEWERAGE Coal settlements 14 Road vehicles 41 Gas 59 4 OTHER MINERALS AND 8 CUTLERY AND Electricity 59 MINERAL PRODUCTS 15 SILVERWARE 42 Water 60 Lime 15 Cutlery 42 Sewerage 61 Ruddle 16 Hand forges 42 13 TRANSPORT Bricks 16 Water power 43 Roads 62 Fireclay 16 Workshops 44 Canals 64 Pottery 17 Silverware 45 Tramroads 65 Glass 17 Other products 48 Railways 66 5 IRON 19 Handles and scales 48 Town Trams 68 Iron mining 19 9 EDGE TOOLS Other road transport 68 Foundries 22 Agricultural tools 49 14 MUSEUMS 69 Wrought iron and water power 23 Other Edge Tools and Files 50 Index 70 Further reading 71 USING THIS BOOK South Yorkshire has a long history of industry including water power, iron, steel, engineering, coal, textiles, and glass.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality Action Plan for Sheffield 2003
    Air Quality Action Plan for Sheffield 2003 Environmental Protection Air Quality Action Plan for Sheffield April 2003 Air quality action planning in Sheffield and Rotherham Status This is the draft action plan for improving air quality in Sheffield. At the present time it does not represent the official position of Sheffield City Council or any of the other bodies and agencies with responsibilities in the area. Local Sheffield City Council Authority: Service Nick Chaplin, Environmental Protection Manager Manager Officer for Steve Simmons contact Address 2-10 Carbrook Hall Road Sheffield S9 2DB Telephone 0114 273 4607 number Email address [email protected] Sheffield City www.sheffield.gov.uk/services/del/ers/Environmental_protection Council Environmental Protection Service website Air quality Sheffield City Centre Clean Air Partnership: partnership www.sheffieldairaction.com websites M1 Corridor Clean Air Partnership www.m1airaction.com 3 Air quality action plan for Sheffield AIR QUALITY ACTION PLAN FOR SHEFFIELD Executive Summary The Issue Poor air quality has been shown to be detrimental to health at concentrations similar to those seen in many parts of the UK. A series of reports have been produced by Sheffield City Council to investigate air quality throughout the City, including most recently the Stage 4 Review and Assessment report published in December 2002. These reports forecast that annual average concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) will exceed the standard laid down in the national air quality strategy in designated Air Action Zones1 in two parts of Sheffield, the City Centre and areas around the M1. The largest contributions to NO2 levels in the two AAZs are from road traffic (for both the M1 and the city centre) and ‘area’ sources (for the city centre alone, covering the domestic, commercial, public and small industry sectors).
    [Show full text]
  • Meadowhall Shopping Centre Tinsley Roundabout M1 J34 A6178
    RETAIL INVESTMENT WITH DEVELOPMENT Meadowhall POTENTIAL LOCATED ON Shopping Centre A GATEWAY SITE NEXT TO MEADOWHALL M1 Shepcote Lane / Plumpers Road, J34 Sheffield S9 1UP Tinsley Roundabout Lane A6178 ote pc e h S Shepcote Lane / Plumpers Road, Sheffield Executive Summary Location Area Situation Description Planning Tenure Tenancy Further Information ExecutiveExecutive SummarySummary Location Area Situation Description Planning Tenure Tenancy Further Information Shepcote Lane / Plumpers Road, Sheffield Executive Summary • Strategically important gateway investment/ development opportunity positioned off Junction 34 of the M1 Motorway close to Meadowhall Shopping Centre and transport interchange which is also the proposed location of the HS2 station for the Sheffield region. • Currently producing an income of £68,500 per annum with the prospect of rental growth and lease re-gear. • Comprising two sites positioned off Shepcote Lane. The Northern plot of land comprises a two-storey retail unit and car park currently occupied by retailer, American Golf. The second plot comprises three former terrace properties currently utilised as a café, together with a separate workshop and cleared amenity land. • Unconditional offers are invited for the combined freehold interest (subject to the leasehold interests granted). Executive Summary Location Area Situation Description Planning Tenure Tenancy Further Information Shepcote Lane / Plumpers Road, Sheffield A6133 36 A638 A635 A635 M1 Goldthorpe A1(M) Location A6195 Doncaster A6195 The property is located in Sheffield, the principal 35a administrative and commercial centre of South A616 A629 Yorkshire and one of the UK’s major cities with the A616 6th highest population and a GVA of £28.2 billion Stocksbridge A61 35 annually. The city is the fourth largest in England Coinsbrough 2 2 with a resident population of 550,000 and a travel to work population of around 1,500,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Terminus - 08.08.15 Date: 8Th August 2015
    1 David Cotterrell: Terminus - 08.08.15 Date: 8th August 2015 Focussing on the absurd beauty of infrastructure in a post-industrial landscape, Terminus is an exhibition of new artwork considering the legacy of masterplanned dreams.The exhibition includes new and existing installations by David Cotterrell as well as commissions by Ron Wright and Michael Day. Private View: Saturday, 8 August, 4-7 pm Location: The Scottish Queen, 21-24 South Street, Park Hill, Sheffield, S2 5QX Exhibition Dates: 9 August 9 September 2015 : Open every day, 2pm - 6.30pm (free entry) Curator's Introduction: David Cotterrell brings three site-specific artworks to The Scottish Queen in Park Hill this summer. Exploring the legacy of the Tinsley Cooling Towers site, these new works focus on the absurd beauty of infrastructure in a post-industrial landscape. Commissioned by Sheffield City Council as an initial phase of / part of the Tinsley Art Project , Terminus is supported by, S1 Artspace, Urban Splash, E.ON, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield Robotics, The European Regional Development Fund and the National Lottery through Arts Council England. Filmed from the E.ON biomass power stations chimney over the course of a day, On Englands pleasant pastures seen documents the sweeping vistas of the Tinsley Viaduct, the biomass plant local sewage works, train lines and canals that jostle for space alongside the hills of the Peak District. At 90m in the air, the view is one that would have been visible from the top of the Cooling Towers, which were demolished in 2008. Cotterrell climbed the chimney in July with a six-lens spherical camera to record the panorama of landscape and infrastructure, which is projected on a bespoke curved wall in the gallery.
    [Show full text]
  • Police and Crime Plan 2017-21 2018 Summary Police and Crime Plan
    Keeping People Safe Summary of the Police and Crime Plan for South Yorkshire 2017 - 2021 2 The role of the Police and Crime Commissioner Every four years, people in each police force area in the country elect a Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) to represent them. My job as PCC is to set the priorities of the police and criminal justice services in South Yorkshire on your behalf. I do this by producing a Police and Crime Plan, setting out what I believe are your priorities for policing and crime. I then communicate this to the police, partner agencies such as the local authority and the NHS, the Police and Crime Panel (local councillors who hold me to account), the Home Office - and the public. Within the Plan is a list of issues that the public, police and partners have identified as areas of concern. (For the full version go to my website: www.southyorkshire-pcc.gov.uk) The Chief Constable, who is responsible for the day-to-day running of the Force, must deliver the priorities and meet the outcomes I have set out in the plan. I hold the Chief Constable to account on the delivery of policing through my Public Accountability Board, which meets in public each month, as well as less formal meetings, discussions and reports throughout the year. I also hold the budget for policing and crime services in South Yorkshire and allocate money to deliver the plans to meet the priorities. This money is collected from a range of sources though principally Government grants and the Council Tax precept.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 5 the VISION and STRATEGY
    Part 5 THE VISION AND STRATEGY 5.0 The Vision Statement .......................................................47 5.1 Masterplan Principles ......................................................48 5.2 A Strategy for Change........................................................50 5.3 The Five Core Strategies ..................................................51 5.4 Transportation & Movement Strategy .............................56 5.5 The Lower Don Valley Masterplan ...................................60 5.6 Regeneration Benefits ......................................................62 Lower Don Valley Masterplan Study Urban Strategies Inc. 45 Over the next twenty years, the Lower Don Valley will be transformed into an attractive, safe and healthy place to live, work and visit. A vibrant and exciting new mix of community, leisure, retail, office and business uses will act as anchors for the area’s new residential communities. In harmony with its residential population, the Lower Don Valley will be a nationally recognised and highly sought-after location for business. Capitalising on its unique and authentic industrial heritage, the Lower Don Valley will be a distinct, yet fully integrated destination within Sheffield. It will be considered a model of sustainability in social, economic and environmental terms. The Lower Don Valley will be a 21st Century Gateway for England’s fastest growing city and most impressive urban regeneration story yet - Sheffield. Lower Don Valley Masterplan Study Urban Strategies Inc. 47 5.1 Masterplan Strategic Principles Build on the established strengths of the area. Direct new uses to locations that support The Vision for the Lower Don Valley describes an area that is authentic, The Lower Don Valley should retain its status and grow as one of appropriate infrastructure. vibrant, distinctive and highly livable. To guide this transformation over Sheffield’s foremost locations for employment and leisure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roads Implementation Plan , Item
    ROADS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1 My Vision is that We will build a transport system that works for everyone, connecting people to the places they want to go within the Sheffield City Region as well as nationally and internationally. This is an important time for the Sheffield City Region. With a programme of national, regional and local transport investment planned, it is important that we have a clear plan to join up this investment to ensure we build a transport system that is fit for the 21st century. SCR to complete once remainder of Plan is ratified 2 CONTENTS FOREWORD SCR ROADS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 1.0 Purpose of the Plan 2.0 Background 3.0 Delivering the Plan 4.0 Measuring Success 3 PURPOSE OF THE PLAN The Sheffield City Region (SCR) Transport Strategy sets out how we intend to better connect our major urban and economic centres to enable the better flow of people, goods, businesses and ideas across the City Region, as well as promoting our rural and visitor economies. By doing so we will help create jobs, secure new investment and grow our economy. The Strategy is underpinned by three goals: The Strategy also envisages a series of implementation plans, some of which the SCR will lead, some of which we will contribute to and some of which we will seek to influence. The Strategy envisages four key programmes, as shown below. This is the Roads Implementation Plan within the Transport Strategy. 4 The underlying theme of the Roads Implementation Plan is that how we use roads needs to change if we are to address issues such as congestion and air quality, contribute to our net-zero targets and create a better public and active travel network as part of the SCR’s whole transport network.
    [Show full text]
  • The Yorkshire River Don and Its Tributaries Synopsis the Document
    The Yorkshire River Don and its Tributaries Synopsis The document describes a virtual journey along the River Don beginning at its source; the perspective is as much historical as descriptive of the current scene. Where significant tributaries join the river, they also are tracked back to their start-points. Particular attention is paid to bridges and watermills because of their intimate associations with the rivers, but nearby buildings, both religious and secular are also given attention. Some people have been specially important to developments associated with the river, and brief biographical notes are provided for them. Finally, I would stress that this is very much a personal account dealing with a river system which I encountered often during my working life and afterwards. Document Navigation I do not provide either a contents list, or an index, but to aid navigation through the document here are page numbers, on which some places appear first in the text. Place Page No. Source of the River Don 3 Penistone 5 Stocksbridge 6 Sheffield 8 Chesterfield 15 Rotherham 21 Denby Dale 23 Barnsley 24 Conisbrough 27 Doncaster 28 Pontefract 32 Goole 34 There is a sketch map of the river and the main tributaries in Table 1 on Page 38. The Bibliography is on Page 43. 1 The Yorkshire River Don and its Tributaries The historical journey I describe is in an important sense virtual, in that I have not travelled along much of the river and its tributaries. The sites of interest dealt with in this account, have been picked out and viewed on separate visits.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Nazi Terror Threat
    esilience R Journal of the Emergency Planning Society Spring 2019 After Christchurch... INSIDE SECURITY: visit to Meadowhall SALISBURY: 12 months in recovery REVIEWS: cyber, Scully, Panorama The new Nazi terror threat ARTIC: look who’s come for dinner... www.the-eps.org CHAIR’S UPDATE esilience Jacqui Semple, R memo EPS Chair Winter 2018-19 issue to the members Contents 4 - 5: Natural Hazards Partnership - find about the free conference on 26-27 March 6 - 9: Drones - the incident at Gatwick is one of many across the world. Resilience looks at how they can be stopped 10 - 11: Book Review - Darren Nugent reviews Mark Urban’s new book on the Skripal incident 13: Tribute to Chris Abbott EPS SITE VISITS: 12 - 13: South West Branch looks at hospital CBRN processes 14 - 15: South West Branch visits the Black Rock Police Firearms training centre 16 - 18: Yorkshire & The Humber Branch tour the huge Drax power complex NEWS UPDATES: 19: Smart Cities - new survey 19: Blue Lights Estates conference report 20: Report back from the Education and Professional Standards Committee 21: Tackling surface water flooding - new trial in York 22: Grenfell Inquiry, Ladbroke Grove commemoration plans, Brazil mining disaster SPRING ISSUE: Copy deadline for articles for the next issue will be THURSDAY 14 March 2019 Send to Bob Wade on: [email protected] 0121 354 8223 07950 155008 Resilience is produced by: Bob Wade Media Ltd, Sutton Coldfield B73 5SS Co. Reg. 07469245 Tel: 0121 354 8223 I 07950 155008 [email protected] Printed by: Exactis Interactive Print . North Yorkshire, YO26 6GA.Tel: 01904 790044 Www.exactis.co.uk Resilience l 3 BRANCH NEWS HERE was still a week to go before the T Spring Equinox, and Thursday, 14 March 2019 was a bright, sunny day.
    [Show full text]