Heritage Section 42A Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Heritage Section 42A Report Heritage Section 42A Report Proposed Second Generation Dunedin City District Plan (2GP) 20 September 2016 HR190-2016-09-21 Emma Christmas Author Name: Emma Christmas Qualifications: MSc Zoology, University of Otago; Certified Hearings Commissioner Experience: I have approximately twenty years planning experience, including preparing and processing resource consent applications and policy development, in both local authority and private practice. I am also a certified independent hearings commissioner. I have been employed by the Dunedin City Council as a Policy Planner since March 2013. I prepared the Heritage section of the 2GP in association with Dr Glen Hazelton, DCC Heritage Planner and Urban Design Team Leader. Code of Conduct I confirm that I have read, and agree to comply with, the Environment Court Code of Conduct for Expert Witnesses (Consolidated Practice Note 2014). 1 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Purpose of the Officer’s Report ........................................................................ 7 1.2 Scope of report/section .................................................................................. 7 2.0 Statutory Context .............................................................................................. 8 2.1 Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) ............................................................ 8 2.2 National Policy Statements (NPS) and National Environment Standards (NES) ........ 8 2.3 Operative and Proposed Regional Policy Statement ............................................ 8 2.4 Dunedin Spatial Plan (September 2012) ......................................................... 10 2.5 Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 ............................................. 11 3.0 Background .................................................................................................... 12 3.1 Consultation ............................................................................................... 12 3.1.1 Issues and options consultation .................................................................. 12 3.1.2 Preferred options consultation .................................................................... 12 3.1.3 Heritage focus group ................................................................................ 12 3.1.4 Heritage New Zealand ............................................................................... 13 3.2 Heritage Precinct Consultation ....................................................................... 13 3.2.1 Queen Street ........................................................................................... 13 3.2.2 York Place – Stuart Street – Arthur Street ................................................... 13 3.2.3 View Street - Tennyson Street precinct ........................................................ 13 3.2.4 Royal Terrace - Pitt Street – Heriot Row ...................................................... 14 3.3 Research and background documents ............................................................. 14 3.3.1 Review of operative plan ........................................................................... 14 3.3.2 Heritage Strategy ..................................................................................... 14 3.3.3 Thematic Study........................................................................................ 14 3.3.4 Dunedin City Heritage Commercial Buildings: Economic Re-use Report, and Heritage Buildings Economic Re-use Steering Group Report ...................................... 15 3.3.5 Heritage precincts research ....................................................................... 15 3.4 Expert advice .............................................................................................. 16 4.0 Summary ....................................................................................................... 16 4.1 Overview of submissions received .................................................................. 16 4.2 Overall recommendations ............................................................................. 16 4.2.1 Heritage general approach background ........................................................ 16 4.2.2 Heritage general approach submissions ....................................................... 16 4.2.3 Scheduled heritage buildings and sites background ....................................... 17 4.2.4 Submissions on scheduled heritage buildings objectives and policies ................ 17 4.2.5 Submissions on Scheduled heritage sites objectives and policies ..................... 18 4.2.6 Submissions on rules related to heritage buildings (scheduled and in precincts) 19 Heritage precincts background ............................................................................. 20 4.2.7 Submissions on Heritage precincts objectives and policies .............................. 20 4.2.8 Submissions requesting changes to the Heritage Schedule ............................. 20 2 4.2.9 Submissions requesting new heritage precincts and changes to precinct boundaries ........................................................................................................ 21 4.2.10 Submissions on Appendix A2 - Heritage precinct values ................................. 23 4.2.11 Archaeological sites background ................................................................. 24 4.2.12 Submissions on Archaeological sites provisions ............................................. 24 4.2.13 Definitions .............................................................................................. 25 5.0 Provision by Provision assessment and recommendations ...................................... 27 5.1 Definitions .................................................................................................. 27 5.1.1 Additions and Alterations definition ............................................................. 27 5.1.2 Repairs and Maintenance definition ............................................................. 31 5.1.3 Restoration definition ................................................................................ 31 5.1.4 Public Place definition ............................................................................... 33 5.1.5 Proposed new definition – Conservation ....................................................... 35 5.2 Heritage general approach ............................................................................ 36 5.2.1 Heritage section ....................................................................................... 36 5.2.2 Heritage general comments ....................................................................... 37 5.2.3 Introduction to Heritage section ................................................................. 38 5.2.4 Objective 2.4.1 ........................................................................................ 43 5.2.5 Objective 2.4.2 ........................................................................................ 44 5.2.6 Heritage Section Objectives and Policies – general ........................................ 47 5.3 Scheduled heritage buildings ......................................................................... 48 5.3.1 Policy 2.4.2.1 .......................................................................................... 48 5.3.2 Objective 13.2.1 ...................................................................................... 50 5.3.3 Policy 13.2.1.2 ......................................................................................... 51 5.4 Earthquake strengthening............................................................................. 53 5.4.1 Policy 2.2.1.9 .......................................................................................... 53 5.4.2 Policy 13.2.1.3 ......................................................................................... 54 5.5 Adaptive re-use .......................................................................................... 56 5.5.1 Policy 2.4.2.3 .......................................................................................... 56 5.5.2 Policy 13.2.1.1 ......................................................................................... 58 5.5.3 Policy 13.2.1.4 ......................................................................................... 59 5.5.4 Policy 13.2.1.9 ......................................................................................... 61 5.6 Additions and alterations .............................................................................. 62 5.6.1 Policy 13.2.1.5 ......................................................................................... 62 5.7 Subdivision................................................................................................. 63 5.7.1 Policy 13.2.1.6 ......................................................................................... 63 5.8 Demolition ................................................................................................. 64 5.8.1 Policy 13.2.1.7 ......................................................................................... 64 5.9 Relocation .................................................................................................. 67 5.9.1 Policy 13.2.1.8 ......................................................................................... 67 5.10 Scheduled heritage
Recommended publications
  • Otago Daily Times Premier League 2.45 Pm
    [email protected] Vol.13, no.5, April 23rd , 2011 5.25 High, 4.25 wide Otago Daily Times Premier League 2.45 pm www.soccerotago.co.nz Caversham v Dunedin Technical Tonga Park 1 Mosgiel v University Prem Memorial 1 Spirit FC v Queenstown ILT Football Turf Grants Braes v Roslyn Wakari AFC Ocean Grove 1 Green Island v Northern Sunnyvale 1 www.footballsouth.co.nz incorporating otago, southland, south canterbury [email protected] [email protected] Footballsouth PO Box 969, 184 High St DN 9054 Caledonian Stadium, Dunedin Patron : Blair Davidson President : Jeff Walker Chairman : Dougal McGowan, Board Members : Matthew Holdridge, Mike Clark, Graeme Wyllie, David Thomson, David Darling, Lance Woods General Manager : Bill Chisholm [email protected] ph. 4746424, cell 021 351 967 Finance : Wilson James, 027 2097228 Operations co-ordinator Pete Ritchie : ph 474 6423 Footballsouth FDOs, Luiz Uehara, Dave Martin-Chambers Footballsouth (Southland) FDO : Ken Cresswell ( Invercargill ) Referee FDO – Chris Boyd, 473 8205 Editor : Rab Smith, [email protected] ODT Premier League 2011 Caversham v Dunedin Technical Mosgiel v University Spirit FC v Queenstown Grants Braes v Roslyn Wakari Green Island v Northern Dn Technical 44002852312 Caversham 43101221010 Roslyn Wakari 42208 3 5 8 Mosgiel 42119 10-1 7 University 42027 7 0 6 Queenstown 42024 16-12 6 Northern 41125 9 -4 4 Grants Braes 41032 7 -5 3 Spirit FC 40131 9 -8 1 Green Island 40043 11-8 0 [email protected] www.soccerotago.co.nz [email protected] Don’t Blame us - we didn’t vote.
    [Show full text]
  • Dunedin Methodist Parish Parish Bulletin
    1 DUNEDIN METHODIST PARISH Finding Good in everyone Finding God in everyone www.dunedinmethodist.org.nz Find us on Facebook: Dunedin Methodist Parish Presbyters Rev David Poultney 974 6172 Mobile phone 022 350 2263 Office phone 466 3023 Office email [email protected] Rev Dr Rod Mitchell 027 647 7003 [email protected] Parish Stewards Mrs Jan Stewart 473 9141 John Hardy 472 7377 Ross Merrett 489 7663 Tongan Steward Mr Kaufusi Pole 455 0096 Parish Prayer Convenor Elaine Merrett 489 7663 [email protected] Pastoral Convenor Beryl Neutze 477 7377 Mornington Parish Office 466 4600 [email protected] PARISH BULLETIN 8 th November 2020 WORSHIP FOR SUNDAY 15th NOVEMBER 2020 9.30 am Mornington H Watson White 10.00am Mosgiel D Poultney 11.00am Glenaven H Watson White 1.00pm St Kilda TBA DATES TO REMEMBER Wed 18th Nov – Parish Council Meeting - 7.30pm Mornington Methodist Church Sat 21st Nov – Spring Working Bee – 10am-12pm Mornington Church Sun 22nd Nov – Explorers – 4.30 pm – Mornington Church Hall Sun 29th Nov – Combined Parish Service at Otakou – 11.00 am Wed 9th Dec – Vist to Rev David’s office – 2.00 pm 2 PASTORAL NEEDS I will be away from the parish from Friday 6th to Thursday 12th November, first of all to attend Methodist Conference in Auckland then the AGM of ICHC in Wellington. I will be reachable by phone, if you have an urgent pastoral need while I am away please contact the Rev Dr Rod Mitchell. Thank you. David Poultney APOLOGY: Marcia Hardy and Helen Watson White’s names were omitted from the list of ordained ministers and lay readers published last week.
    [Show full text]
  • APPLICATION INFORMATION 2019 Hands-On at Otago
    2019 Hands-On at Otago Whai Wheako i Ōtākou Science | Humanities | Business 13–18 January 2019 APPLICATION INFORMATION Hands-On at Otago Whai Wheako i Ōtākou 13 – 18 January 2019 Application Information Hands-On at Otago Hands-On at Otago is a programme designed to allow students to experience a week of the Otago student life, living in a residential College, undertaking detailed studies and learning from some of the foremost researchers in the country. The environment is friendly, inclusive, supportive and interactive. Students are encouraged to participate fully in research projects, in a range of other University studies, and in an exciting social and recreational programme. There are opportunities for students to explore career options and to consider new and unfamiliar possibilities for study. Hands-On at Otago brings up to 400 secondary students to New Zealand’s oldest and most attractive university, an institution having an international reputation for excellence in research and teaching. Hands-On at Otago will be held at the University of Otago, Dunedin, from 13 to 18 January 2019. To qualify for the programme, students must be entering Year 12 or 13 in 2019. Teachers or principals are required to complete a section on the application form confirming that the student has strong motivation and the potential to excel. Applicants are required to write a page to support their application, which should include any information they feel is relevant and important 1 Programme: The Hands-on Week Each morning of the Hands-On at Otago week the students participate in a Research Project based in a University department.
    [Show full text]
  • Morning and Evening Prayer by the Vicar
    THE ROCK Anglican Parish of Caversham Saint Peter, February 2020 — Lent Dunedin, New Zealand Morning and Evening Prayer By The Vicar PHOTO.: INFORMATION SERVICES OTAGO LTD. ach working day I go across to the church service, one from the Old and one from the New around 6.30am and after a time of private Testament. They are also the prayer of the church, so prayer say the Morning Office of Morning from church after church in the Anglican world God’s Prayer. Around 4 o’clock I return to the church praises are being said or sung and intercessory prayers Eto say Evening Prayer before closing the church. The are being offered up on behalf of the whole church. At the prayer book I use is the New Zealand 1989 prayer book of end of Morning Prayer I use the Anglican Communion our church. It is particularly good in the wide use of daily cycle of intercession, praying for every diocese and canticles from the Old and New Testaments, so one is its bishop in the communion, the Dunedin diocese cycle of using different songs of praise drawn prayer which covers every parish, the Coming visits from scripture at every service. Church Missionary cycle of prayer and Instead of the lectionary suggestion of my own prayer note book which just one psalm at each service I follow intercedes for every parishioner by the recommendation of Archbishop name and for the people in my family Cranmer and say the psalms for the and friendship world. It is the Vicar’s day, thus getting through the entire job to pray for even those who may not psalter each month.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Driving Waitati Curve Realignment Project by the Editors the New Zealand Transport Agency Expects to Environment
    Doctors Point, Waitati, Evansdale, Warrington, Seacliff 1 June 2010 Safety driving Waitati curve realignment project by the editors The New Zealand Transport Agency expects to environment. They say another key safety benefit begin realigning the tight curve in State Highway will come from the store being accessed from 1 at Waitati early next year. The work will involve Harvey St, where the speed limit is only 50km/h. shifting the Blueskin General Store to a new site The new store will have improved parking, turning next to the Blueskin Nursery, on land occupied by areas for cars, buses and trucks. the existing highway. The Harvey St intersection Because the store cannot be permanently into Waitati will also be upgraded. relocated to its new site until the highway works NZTA says the aim of the project is to are complete, NZTA will build a temporary store improve highway safety by aligning the curve so on Harvey St between the former hall and Gallery it is more compatible with the rural (100km/h) on Blueskin. As part of the project, there will be Local Identity will be improvements to adjacent QEII covenant area. The missed intersection has been designed so the registered oak tree and adjacent beech tree are not affected. The project will provide car pool parking and bus bays. Some sections of the highway not required for realignment will be made available for parking. NZTA expect the project to cost $3.5M-$4M, and construction is planned to commence in January 2011 and to be completed by December 2012. NZTA will lodge consents for this work in July.
    [Show full text]
  • Easter-Mass-Times-Btxw.Pdf
    OTAGO AND SOUTHLAND CATHOLIC HOLY WEEK/EASTER CEREMONY TIMES 2018 Alexandra Holy Thursday: 7:00pm Good Friday: 3:00pm Easter Sunday: 9.00am Balclutha Holy Thursday: 7:30pm Good Friday: 3:00pm Holy Saturday: 8:00pm Easter Vigil Easter Sunday: 10:30am Brockville (see Hills Pastoral Area) Cathedral Holy Thursday: 7:00pm Good Friday: 3:00pm Holy Saturday: 8:00pm Easter Vigil Easter Sunday: 10:00am Cromwell Holy Thursday: 7:30pm Good Friday: 3:00pm Holy Saturday: 7:30pm Easter Vigil Easter Sunday: 11:00am Wanaka Holy Thursday: 7:30pm Good Friday: 3:00pm Holy Saturday: 7.30pm Easter Vigil Easter Sunday: 9:00am Dunedin North (see Dunedin North Pastoral Area) Dunedin North Pastoral Area Holy Thursday: 7:00pm (at Sacred Heart, North East Valley) Good Friday: 3:00pm (at Holy Name, Dunedin North) Holy Saturday: 7:00pm Easter Vigil (at Sacred Heart, North East Valley) Easter Sunday: 9:30am (at Sacred Heart, North East Valley) 7:30am, 10:00am, 7:00pm (Holy Name, Dunedin North) Dunedin South (Mercy Parish) – St Patrick’s Basilica, Macandrew Road Holy Thursday: 7:00pm Good Friday: 3:00pm Holy Saturday: 8:00pm Easter Vigil Easter Sunday: 10.00am Samoan (St Paul’s, Corstorphine) Holy Saturday 8:00pm Easter Vigil - Samoan Georgetown - Invercargill Holy Thursday: (See Invercargill Central or Invercargill North) Good Friday: (See Invercargill Central or Invercargill North) Holy Saturday: (See Invercargill Central or Invercargill North) Easter Sunday: 9:00am Rimu Easter Sunday: 11:00am Gore Holy Thursday: 7:00pm Good Friday: 3:00pm Holy Saturday: 9:00pm Easter
    [Show full text]
  • No 71, 25 September 1913, 2873
    jumb. 71. 287-3 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE. WELLINGTON. THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1913. Ohange of Name of Locality, " Wade" to "SilveTdale." Land set apart fo·t Selection. [L.S.} LIVERPOOL, Governor. [L.S.] LIVERPOOL. Governor. A PROCLAMATION. A PROCLAMATION. HEREAS settlers fo the locality known as "Wade," HEREA.S bv section seventv - seven of the New W in the County of Waitcmata, desire that the name W Zealand State-guaranteed Advances Act, 1909, as of such locality be chaugecl to " Silverdale " : And whereas a.mended by section twenty-two of the New Zealand State­ the Council of the County of Waitemata has, by resolution guaranteed Advances An,endmeut Act. 1910, it is, amongst adopted at an ordinary meeting thereof, consented to the other things, enacted that m no case shall any moneys be name of " Silverdale " being substituted for the existing expended nuder the provisions of the said section seventy­ name of" Wade": seven in connection with any block of land unless that block is set apart for selection under that section pursuant to Now, therefore, in pursuance and exercise of the powers Proclamation in that behalf : and authorities conferred on me by the Designation cf Dis­ Now, therefore, in pursuance and exercise of every power tricts Act, 1908, and of all other powers and authorities and authodty enabling me in tl-'s behalf, and for the enabling me in this behalf, I, Arthur William de Brito Sa vile, purposes of the aforesaid Acts, I ..\ rt mr W ,l!iam de Brito Earl cf Liverpool, the Governor of the Dominion of New Ha vile, Earl of Liverpool, the Ge, er.1or of the Dominion of Zealand, do hereby proclaim and declare that the name of New Zealand, do hereby proclaim ,ne land described in the the locality now known as "Wade," in the County of Waite­ Schedule hereto as set apart for selection.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Mount Victoria Historical Society Walking Guide Tour (Alan Middleton- Olliver)
    Northern Mount Victoria Historical Society Walking Guide Tour (Alan Middleton- Olliver) Captain C.W. Mein Smith's original map "Plan of the Town of Wellington, Port Nicholson, 14 August 1840" For the New Zealand Company established the basic street structure for Mount Victoria. Whereas southern Mount Victoria was an extension of the Te Aro flat grid street pattern, the steepness of the land in northern Mount Victoria, dictated some alteration to the grid pattern. The original streets of the suburb were Majoribanks, Pirie and Ellice in the east west direction, Brougham and Austin Streets and Kent Terrace in the north south direction, with Roxburgh, Mcfarlane, and Hawker streets and Clyde Quay in the northern area. The map also shows the proposed canal route along to the Basin and Hawker street going over the hill and joining onto Oriental Terrace, now Oriental Parade. Approximately 36 acres were surveyed and defined in the northern area. Initial building development was haphazard as some acres had been purchased by land speculators. Thomas Ward's 1891 Survey of Wellington map shows the number of streets and pedestrian lanes in Mount Victoria had increased from 10 to 27, and by 1933 there were 47. Studying the Street maps and examining the Wises Directories gives a good indication of the development of the streets. These streets were at varying widths, including pedestrian lanes, and resulted from the haphazard subdivision of the original acres and the peculiarities of local topography. Some streets began as small private pedestrian lanes, which were only taken over by the Council at a much later date.
    [Show full text]
  • The Centre for Building Performance Research and the School of Architecture, Victoria University, Wellington
    McCARTHY | War, America and Modernity: Anscombe's revival of the Combination Factory | AHA: Architectural History Aotearoa (2008) vol 5:72-82 War, America, and Modernity: Anscombe's revival of the Combination Factory Christine McCarthy, School of Architecture, Victoria University, Wellington ABSTRACT: Following the success of the design of the 1939-40 Centennial Exhibition, Edmund Anscombe began investigating factory architecture. This interest - which had entertained him since before his 1919 publication Modern Industrial Development - characterised the last eight years of his life, apparent in his office's factory designs for: Samuel Brown Ltd (1940,1943), the Disabled Soldiers' Vocational Centre/Rehabilitation League (1942-43), Die Castings Ltd, Lower Hutt (1943) and the WH Symmington & Co.'s factory, Palmerston North (1948). This paper examines this work in relation to his visit to America in 1940 and his proposal for a combined factory on Aotea Quay (1943). Introduction than this, and that this co-incidence is mantra that "Form follows Function" are all I don't think anyone has ever accused particular to, and facilitated through, his 1940s well known. Mary McLeod has argued in Edmund Anscombe of being a Modernist. work. It insinuates a Modern, rather than 1983 that Le Corbusier was associated with "a Best known for his Art Deco and exhibition moderne, side to Anscombe, as one more of general ideological position current in designs (culminating in his 1939-40 his many chameleon endeavours, and argues postwar France that was predicated
    [Show full text]
  • Preferred Options Report
    City Development February 2014 2GP Preferred Options Consultation Phase Report Dunedin City Council Second Generation District Plan Final Sign-off Who Signature Project Manager: Anna Johnson Prepared by: Angus Robertson Reviewed by: Paul Freeland Approved for issue by: Anna Johnson Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Background ................................................................................................................................. 1 2.1 2GP Consultation .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Preferred Options consultation phase .......................................................................................... 3 2.3 The consultation process .............................................................................................................. 3 3.0 Feedback results ....................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Strategic Directions ....................................................................................................................... 7 3.1.1 Dunedin is Environmentally Sustainable and Resilient ................................................... 8 3.1.2 Dunedin is Economically Prosperous .............................................................................. 9 3.1.3 Dunedin is a Memorable
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory Report
    Date: July 2013 Former Franconia House 136 The Terrace Images: Charles Collins (2015) Summary of heritage significance • The former Franconia House is an elegant six-storey high office building designed in a sweeping and original High Moderne style. The building is notable for its asymmetrical facades that utilise a combination of curved and plane faces and are decorated with a restrained palette of Art Deco-inspired motifs and ornamentation. • The building with its striking Moderne north, east and west facades is a local landmark on The Terrace. It has group value with other surviving early apartment buildings on The Terrace, including Braemar at the north end. • The building has historic significance as an early example of high-density inner city living and as a good surviving example of the work of its designer, the well known architect Edmund Anscombe. 1 Date: July 2013 District Plan: Map 17, reference 452 (DPC 53) Legal Description: Lot 1 DP 64269 Heritage Area: None 2013 HPT Listed: Category II ref 1364 Archaeological Site: Central City NZAA R27/270 Lintas House Invincible House Other Names: Challenger House Franconia House Key physical dates: 1938 Architect: Edmund Anscombe Architect / Builder: Builder: L. Daniels Former uses: apartments Current uses: Commercial offices SR191206 , Bdg StrengthInv, Bldg -, NOT Earthquake Earthquake Prone Status: Prone Extent: Cityview GIS 2013 2 Date: July 2013 1.0 Outline History 1.1 History Franconia, designed by noted architectural firm Edmund Anscombe & Associates, was built as a set of residential flats for Topic Limited in 1938.1 High-density residential buildings of this nature began to appear in the main centres of New Zealand in the early 1920s.2 Braemar, at 32 The Terrace is a prime example in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Agendas 24 July 2014 Public.Pdf
    1 Our Ref A610586 Committee meetings Thursday 24 July 2014 Following are the agendas for the Committee meetings to be held on Thursday 24 July commencing at 8.30 am. The venue is the Council Chamber, 70 Stafford Street, Dunedin. Members of the public are welcome to attend. Index Page Nos. Finance and Corporate Committee ...............................................................................2 - 32 Technical Committee ...................................................................................................33 - 84 Communications Committee ........................................................................................85 - 97 Policy Committee ........................................................................................................ 98 - 171 Regulatory Committee ............................................................................................... 172 - 197 Committee agendas 24 July 2014 2 OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL Agenda for a meeting of the Finance and Corporate Committee to be held in the Council Chamber, 70 Stafford Street, Dunedin on Thursday 24 July 2014 commencing at 8.30 am Membership: Cr David Shepherd (Chairperson) Cr Gary Kelliher (Deputy Chairperson) Cr Graeme Bell Cr Doug Brown Cr Louise Croot MNZM Cr Michael Deaker Cr Gerrard Eckhoff Cr Trevor Kempton Cr Sam Neill Cr Gretchen Robertson Cr Bryan Scott Cr Stephen Woodhead Apologies: Cr Gretchen Robertson Leave of absence: In attendance: Please note that there is an embargo on agenda items until 8.30 am on Tuesday 22 July. CONFIRMATION
    [Show full text]