DOCSLIB.ORG

Interesting Weed Records from Cereal Fields in Zonguldak Province (Turkey)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ISSN 1211-3026 Čas. Slez. Muz. Opava (A), 61: 219-225, 2012 DOI: 10.2478/v10210-012-0021-3 Interesting weed records from cereal fields in Zonguldak province (Turkey) Šárka Cimalová Interesting weed records from cereal fields in Zonguldak province (Turkey). − Čas. Slez. Muz. Opava (A), 61: 219-225, 2012. Abstract: New floristic records of weed species were taken from cereal fields in June 2012 from localities in Akçabey village, Kayıkçılar village and from Degirmena ğzı in Zonguldak province (Turkey). The records represent a total of 69 taxa belonging to 24 families from which the most frequent are Fabaceae (13,04%), Asteraceae (10,14%), Poaceae (10,14%), Rosaceae (8.7%), Apiaceae (7,25%) and Ranunculaceae (5.8%). Most of listed species are native in flora of Turkey and also occur as threatened taxa in the flora of the Czech Republic as naturalized or casual archaeophytes ( Agrostemma githago, Bromus arvensis ), casual neophytes ( Medicago polymorpha, Trifolium tomentosum ) or as native species ( Aphanes australis, Filago vulgaris ). Key words: species distribution, weed flora Introduction Turkey is situated at the crossroad of three major culture centers between Asia, Africa and Europe. Historical migration of people affected enrichment of diversity of cultivated plants which were brought to Turkey from distant lands. Nevertheless Turkey is also a center of origin of important global genetic resources for numerous agricultural crop plants including cereals (Zohary & Hopf 2000, Abbo et al. 2010). During a long time period of crop plant cultivation a specific group of vascular plants was selected as weed species accompanying crops. Interesting is, that weed species on fields in Turkey are often plants native by their origin, which is not typical for many weed floras of the world (Türe & Böcük 2008). Turkey belongs to countries which are under the long term anthropogenic effects of agriculture. Cultivated areas currently constitute about 35% of Turkey’s total surface area. 70% of the total agricultural area is formed by cropland and 18% is left fallow. The remaining 11,7% is created by orchards, vegetable gardens, vineyards and by olive groves (Anonymous 2007). Zonguldak province (Fig. 1) is situated in the western Black Sea region with prevailing moderate oceanic climate in Mediterranean climatic zone (Akman 1990). Although it is one of the Turkey’s main ecological regions from the agricultural point of view (Anonymous 2007), weed field vegetation hasn’t been studied here. The recent information about segetal flora in Turkey, where is given systematical determination, life forms, phytogeographical regions or species frequency we can find from Anatolia province (Türe & Köse 2000, Türe 2003), Marmara province (Kireç & Yarci 1999, Uysal et al. 2003), Isparta Province (Kitis & Boz 2003) or Erzurum province (Kaya & Zengin 2000). The main goal of this paper is to bring a short view into weed vegetation composition in the Zonguldak region and should be supplemented by further research. Methods Weed flora was studied on cereal fields on three localities in Zonguldak province (Fig. 1): Akçabey village (272 m a. s. l.) (loc. 1), Kayıkçılar village (28 m a. s. l.) (loc. 2) and Zonguldak Degirmena ğzı (43.1 m a. s. l.) (loc. 3). Field data were collected at the beginning of summer in June 2012. Interesting taxa were completed with their taxonomy, biology and distribution by Davis (1965-1985), Davis et al. (1988) and Güner et al. (2000) and by Flora of the Czech Republic (K řísa 1988 a,b; Smejkal 1988; Šourková 1990; Kovanda 1992; Holub 219 1995; Kirschner & Št ěpánek 1995; Hrouda 1997 a, b; Kubát 1995; Šourková & Hrouda 1997; Štech 2004 a, b). Distribution maps of particular species were taken from database Tübives (Babac M.T., Uslu E. & Baki ş Y. 2001; Babaç 2004). Taxa are sorted by decreasing frequency of family (in brackets) and also alphabetically. Nomenclature follows Checklist of vascular plants of the Czech Republic (Danihelka et al. 2012), residence time status in the Czech Republic follows Pyšek et al. (2012). Red list for taxa following (Grulich 2012) (A1-extinct or vanished data, C1-critically threatened taxa, C2-endangered taxa, C3-vulnerable taxa; the reason for classification: t=declining trend, b=combination of declining trend and rarity). Fig 1: Map of Zonguldak province with localities 1-3 (1- Akçabey village, 2- Kayıkçılar village and 3- Zonguldak Degirmena ğzı) Results and discussion This paper brings several new records of vascular plant species for Zonguldak province. Interesting taxa which are mostly native species in Turkey and also occur in the Czech Republic as rare species are shown in the text bellow. Species names with * sign are new for flora of Zonguldak province (Saribas & Kaplan 2008 a, b). For a comparison of the species occurrence the distribution maps of taxa which are taken from database Tübives (Babac M.T., Uslu E. & Baki ş Y. (2001) are given on the Fig. 2a-j. Table 1 shows a list of represented families in species records. The most frequent families in weed vegetation of Zonguldak localities are Fabaceae (13,04%), Asteraceae (10,14%), Poaceae (10,14%), Rosaceae (8.7%), Apiaceae (7,25%) and Ranunculaceae (5.8%), which taxonomical distribution is comparable with other studies from agricultural areas in Turkey (Kireç & Yarci 1999, Türe & Köse 2000, Uysal et al. 2003). There are important differences among new species records. The records of widespread common species such as Polygonum aviculare or Viola arvensis show that weed flora in Zonguldak province has not been studied till now, simply because it has not been in the centre of interest of botanists. But records of rare species as Aphanes australis or Fumaria rostellata are very interesting. The first species is probably neglected similarly to relative Aphanes arvensis in the central Europe (Cimalová 2006). Aphanes australis is native in Turkey and its 220 distribution area extends to southern Europe, Cyprus, Palestine and NW Africa. The second named species, Fumaria rostellata is rare because it has mainly central European distribution and localities in Turkey are only secondary. The distribution areas of the other taxa of which all are native in Turkey include mainly southern (Mediterranean) parts of Europe and Asia with an overlap of northern Africa. Secondary introduced they are in America ( Filago vulgaris, Ranunculus arvensis, Turgenia latifolia, Bromus arvensis ), in Australia ( Briza maxima, Medicago polymorpha and Trifolium tomentosum ), in New Zealand or in the Far East of Asia ( Bupleurum rotundifolium ). In the Czech Republic have these taxa rare occurrence (Grulich 2012) as naturalized ( Agrostemma githago, Anagallis foemina ) or casual archaeophytes ( Bromus arvensis, Bupleurum rotundifolium ), casual neophytes ( Briza maxima , Medicago polymorpha, Trifolium tomentosum ) or as native species ( Aphanes australis, Filago vulgaris ) (Pyšek et al. 2012). a) Anagallis foemina b) Adonis annua c) Aphanes australis d) Briza maxima e) Bromus arvensis f) Filago pyramidata g) Filago vulgaris h) Fumaria rostellata i) Ranunculus arvensis j) Trifolium tomentosum Fig 2: Records of the species distribution in Turkey (Tübives 2012) 221 Fabaceae (13,04%) *Medicago polymorpha (loc. 3): native to Mediterranean parts of Europe, northern Africa, the Azores, the Madeira Islands, the Canary Islands, western Asia, north-western India and Pakistan; naturalized in Australia, Norfolk and other parts of the world; in the Czech Republic as casual neophyte *Trifolium tomentosum (Fig.2j), (loc. 3): native to northern Africa, the Azores, the Madeira Islands, the Canary Islands, southern Mediterranean Europe and south-western Asia; naturalized in Australia; in the Czech Republic as casual neophyte Asteraceae (10,14%) Filago pyramidata (Fig. 2f), (loc. 1): native to southern and south-western Europe with Submediterranean- Subatlantic distribution, where it reaches its northern limit in England; northern Africa, south-western and central Asia (including the Caucasus, and Turkestan); in the Czech Republic as casual neophyte Filago vulgaris (Fig. 2g), (loc.2): native in western, central (including the Czech Republic-C1 t) and southern Europe, north-western Africa, the Crimea, the Caucasus; western border of the distribution is in northern Iran. The southern boundary passes through Algeria, Crete and northern Turkey. Secondary in North America Poaceae (10,14%) *Briza maxima (Fig. 2d), (loc. 3): native to southern Europe, western Asia and northern Africa; secondary in the British Islands, North and South America, Japan and Australasia; in the Czech Republic as casual neophyte *Bromus arvensis (Fig. 2e), (loc. 1): native to central and southern, mainly in the Mediterranean, part of Europe, south-western and central Asia; secondary in North and South America; in the Czech Republic as casual archaeophyte (C1 t) Rosaceae (8.70%) *Aphanes australis (Fig. 2c), (loc. 3): native to euro-subatlantic areas in western, central (including the Czech Republic-C1b) and southern Europe including the British Islands, Cyprus, Palestine, north-western Africa; secondary in North America Apiaceae (7,25%) *Bupleurum rotundifolium (loc. 2): native to south-western Asia, central, southern and western Europe; secondary in south-eastern Asia, North America, Australia and New Zealand; in the Czech Republic as casual archaeophyte (C1 t) *Caucalis platycarpos (loc. 2): native to Europe excluding of Scandinavia, eastern on the Caucasus, the Crimea and Iran; secondary in northern parts of distribution
Recommended publications
  • ED45E Rare and Scarce Species Hierarchy.Pdf

    ED45E Rare and Scarce Species Hierarchy.Pdf

    104 Species 55 Mollusc 8 Mollusc 334 Species 181 Mollusc 28 Mollusc 44 Species 23 Vascular Plant 14 Flowering Plant 45 Species 23 Vascular Plant 14 Flowering Plant 269 Species 149 Vascular Plant 84 Flowering Plant 13 Species 7 Mollusc 1 Mollusc 42 Species 21 Mollusc 2 Mollusc 43 Species 22 Mollusc 3 Mollusc 59 Species 30 Mollusc 4 Mollusc 59 Species 31 Mollusc 5 Mollusc 68 Species 36 Mollusc 6 Mollusc 81 Species 43 Mollusc 7 Mollusc 105 Species 56 Mollusc 9 Mollusc 117 Species 63 Mollusc 10 Mollusc 118 Species 64 Mollusc 11 Mollusc 119 Species 65 Mollusc 12 Mollusc 124 Species 68 Mollusc 13 Mollusc 125 Species 69 Mollusc 14 Mollusc 145 Species 81 Mollusc 15 Mollusc 150 Species 84 Mollusc 16 Mollusc 151 Species 85 Mollusc 17 Mollusc 152 Species 86 Mollusc 18 Mollusc 158 Species 90 Mollusc 19 Mollusc 184 Species 105 Mollusc 20 Mollusc 185 Species 106 Mollusc 21 Mollusc 186 Species 107 Mollusc 22 Mollusc 191 Species 110 Mollusc 23 Mollusc 245 Species 136 Mollusc 24 Mollusc 267 Species 148 Mollusc 25 Mollusc 270 Species 150 Mollusc 26 Mollusc 333 Species 180 Mollusc 27 Mollusc 347 Species 189 Mollusc 29 Mollusc 349 Species 191 Mollusc 30 Mollusc 365 Species 196 Mollusc 31 Mollusc 376 Species 203 Mollusc 32 Mollusc 377 Species 204 Mollusc 33 Mollusc 378 Species 205 Mollusc 34 Mollusc 379 Species 206 Mollusc 35 Mollusc 404 Species 221 Mollusc 36 Mollusc 414 Species 228 Mollusc 37 Mollusc 415 Species 229 Mollusc 38 Mollusc 416 Species 230 Mollusc 39 Mollusc 417 Species 231 Mollusc 40 Mollusc 418 Species 232 Mollusc 41 Mollusc 419 Species 233
  • The Role of Traditional Livelihood Practices and Local Ethnobotanical Knowledge in Mitigating Chestnut Disease and Pest Severity in Turkey

    The Role of Traditional Livelihood Practices and Local Ethnobotanical Knowledge in Mitigating Chestnut Disease and Pest Severity in Turkey

    Article The Role of Traditional Livelihood Practices and Local Ethnobotanical Knowledge in Mitigating Chestnut Disease and Pest Severity in Turkey Jeffrey Wall 1,* , Co¸skunKöse 2,*, Nesibe Köse 3, Taner Okan 4 , Elif Ba¸sakAksoy 5, Devra Jarvis 6,7 and Shorna Allred 1 1 Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA 2 Department of Forest Biology and Wood Protection Technology, Faculty of Forestry, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, 34473 Bahçeköy-Istanbul, Turkey 3 Department of Forest Botany, Faculty of Forestry, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, 34473 Bahçeköy-Istanbul, Turkey 4 Department of Forestry Economics, Faculty of Forestry, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, 34473 Bahçeköy-Istanbul, Turkey 5 Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Letters, Hacettepe University, 06800 Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey 6 Bioversity International, Via dei Tre Denari 472/a, Maccarese, 00057 Rome, Italy 7 Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.W); [email protected] (C.K.); Tel.: +1-607-252-6579 (J.W.); +90-212-338-2400 (C.K.) Received: 30 May 2019; Accepted: 9 July 2019; Published: 10 July 2019 Abstract: The European chestnut population is enduring multiple compounding exotic pest and disease outbreaks across Turkey. The deeply held value of the chestnut species for the Turkish public is reflected in substantial government conservation programming. Chestnut is predominantly found on state land managed by Turkey’s General Directorate of Forestry (GDF), which generally upholds restrictive policies for chestnut-related livelihood practices other than nut collection and beehive placement. Such policies are justified by a government position that human activities and presence is likely to worsen disease dynamics.
  • Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) Sammlungen, Landhausplatz 1, a 3109 St

    Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) Sammlungen, Landhausplatz 1, a 3109 St

    ©Wiener Coleopterologenverein (WCV), download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Koleopterologische Rundschau 80 70 Wien, September 2010 Koleopterologische Rundschau 80 71–102 Wien, September 2010 Buchbesprechung On the Staphylinidae of Turkey RESSL, F. & KUST, T. 2010: Naturkunde des Bezirkes Scheibbs. Tierwelt 4. – Wissen- VII. Five new species and additional records schaftliche Mitteilungen aus dem Niederösterreichischen Landesmuseum 20: 11–436. Bestellung: [email protected] (Mag. Christian Dietrich, Amt d. NÖ Landesreg., Naturwissenschaftliche (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) Sammlungen, Landhausplatz 1, A 3109 St. Pölten). Preis: € 25.- V. ASSING Franz Ressl ist keiner, der sich auf seinen Lorbeeren ausruht. Trotz schwerer Krankheit und trotz seines hohen Alters arbeitet er unermüdlich an der sukzessiven Publikation seines Lebenswerks. Franz Ressl ist Amateur aber seine Leistung ist grandios und nachvollziehbar zugleich. Leider gibt es heute nur noch wenige Biologen seines Kalibers, ein Nachfolger ist nicht in Sicht. Frei nach dem Motto: „Forscher spielen ist nicht schwer, Forscher sein Abstract hingegen sehr“, sollten sein Fleiß und seine Tatkraft manchem Möchtegern-Biodiversitätsforscher zu Denken geben. Five species of Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) from Turkey are described and illustrated: Astenus Mit Theo Kust hat Franz Ressl zu guter Letzt noch einen kongenialen Partner gefunden, der ihm die endgültige (Eurysunius) sultanicus sp.n. (Konya), and Domene miranda sp.n. (Kastamonu) of the Paederinae, as Umsetzung seiner Pläne in professioneller Weise ermöglicht. Theo Kust, Berufsfotograf und ehemaliger Verlags- well as Brachida hatayana sp.n. (Hatay), Liogluta falcata sp.n. (Kastamonu), and Atheta (Anopleta) leiter, von Natur aus hilfsbereit, geduldig und begeisterungsfähig, bringt alle notwendigen Voraussetzungen in diese esuriens sp.n. (Adana) of the Aleocharinae. A new synonymy is proposed: Atheta (Ceritaxa) “Ehe” mit.
  • Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plant List

    Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plant List

    UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plants Below is the most recently updated plant list for UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve. * non-native taxon ? presence in question Listed Species Information: CNPS Listed - as designated by the California Rare Plant Ranks (formerly known as CNPS Lists). More information at http://www.cnps.org/cnps/rareplants/ranking.php Cal IPC Listed - an inventory that categorizes exotic and invasive plants as High, Moderate, or Limited, reflecting the level of each species' negative ecological impact in California. More information at http://www.cal-ipc.org More information about Federal and State threatened and endangered species listings can be found at https://www.fws.gov/endangered/ (US) and http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/ t_e_spp/ (CA). FAMILY NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME LISTED Ferns AZOLLACEAE - Mosquito Fern American water fern, mosquito fern, Family Azolla filiculoides ? Mosquito fern, Pacific mosquitofern DENNSTAEDTIACEAE - Bracken Hairy brackenfern, Western bracken Family Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens fern DRYOPTERIDACEAE - Shield or California wood fern, Coastal wood wood fern family Dryopteris arguta fern, Shield fern Common horsetail rush, Common horsetail, field horsetail, Field EQUISETACEAE - Horsetail Family Equisetum arvense horsetail Equisetum telmateia ssp. braunii Giant horse tail, Giant horsetail Pentagramma triangularis ssp. PTERIDACEAE - Brake Family triangularis Gold back fern Gymnosperms CUPRESSACEAE - Cypress Family Hesperocyparis macrocarpa Monterey cypress CNPS - 1B.2, Cal IPC
  • ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 7Th Edition

    ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 7Th Edition

    ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names th 7 Edition ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori Published by All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be The Internation Seed Testing Association (ISTA) reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted Zürichstr. 50, CH-8303 Bassersdorf, Switzerland in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior ©2020 International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) permission in writing from ISTA. ISBN 978-3-906549-77-4 ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names 1st Edition 1966 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Prof P. A. Linehan 2nd Edition 1983 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. H. Pirson 3rd Edition 1988 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. W. A. Brandenburg 4th Edition 2001 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 5th Edition 2007 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 6th Edition 2013 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. J. H. Wiersema 7th Edition 2019 ISTA Nomenclature Committee Chair: Dr. M. Schori 2 7th Edition ISTA List of Stabilized Plant Names Content Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Symbols and Abbreviations ..........................................................................................................................
  • Lundberg Et Al. 2009

    Lundberg Et Al. 2009

    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 51 (2009) 269–280 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Allopolyploidy in Fragariinae (Rosaceae): Comparing four DNA sequence regions, with comments on classification Magnus Lundberg a,*, Mats Töpel b, Bente Eriksen b, Johan A.A. Nylander a, Torsten Eriksson a,c a Department of Botany, Stockholm University, SE-10691, Stockholm, Sweden b Department of Environmental Sciences, Gothenburg University, Box 461, SE-40530, Göteborg, Sweden c Bergius Foundation, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, SE-10405, Stockholm, Sweden article info abstract Article history: Potential events of allopolyploidy may be indicated by incongruences between separate phylogenies Received 23 June 2008 based on plastid and nuclear gene sequences. We sequenced two plastid regions and two nuclear ribo- Revised 25 February 2009 somal regions for 34 ingroup taxa in Fragariinae (Rosaceae), and six outgroup taxa. We found five well Accepted 26 February 2009 supported incongruences that might indicate allopolyploidy events. The incongruences involved Aphanes Available online 5 March 2009 arvensis, Potentilla miyabei, Potentilla cuneata, Fragaria vesca/moschata, and the Drymocallis clade. We eval- uated the strength of conflict and conclude that allopolyploidy may be hypothesised in the four first Keywords: cases. Phylogenies were estimated using Bayesian inference and analyses were evaluated using conver- Allopolyploidy gence diagnostics. Taxonomic implications are discussed for genera such as Alchemilla, Sibbaldianthe, Cha- Fragariinae Incongruence maerhodos, Drymocallis and Fragaria, and for the monospecific Sibbaldiopsis and Potaninia that are nested Molecular phylogeny inside other genera. Two orphan Potentilla species, P. miyabei and P. cuneata are placed in Fragariinae.
  • Classification of the Vegetation Alliances and Associations of Sonoma County, California

    Classification of the Vegetation Alliances and Associations of Sonoma County, California

    Classification of the Vegetation Alliances and Associations of Sonoma County, California Volume 1 of 2 – Introduction, Methods, and Results Prepared by: California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program California Native Plant Society Vegetation Program For: The Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District The Sonoma County Water Agency Authors: Anne Klein, Todd Keeler-Wolf, and Julie Evens December 2015 ABSTRACT This report describes 118 alliances and 212 associations that are found in Sonoma County, California, comprising the most comprehensive local vegetation classification to date. The vegetation types were defined using a standardized classification approach consistent with the Survey of California Vegetation (SCV) and the United States National Vegetation Classification (USNVC) system. This floristic classification is the basis for an integrated, countywide vegetation map that the Sonoma County Vegetation Mapping and Lidar Program expects to complete in 2017. Ecologists with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the California Native Plant Society analyzed species data from 1149 field surveys collected in Sonoma County between 2001 and 2014. The data include 851 surveys collected in 2013 and 2014 through funding provided specifically for this classification effort. An additional 283 surveys that were conducted in adjacent counties are included in the analysis to provide a broader, regional understanding. A total of 34 tree-overstory, 28 shrubland, and 56 herbaceous alliances are described, with 69 tree-overstory, 51 shrubland, and 92 herbaceous associations. This report is divided into two volumes. Volume 1 (this volume) is composed of the project introduction, methods, and results. It includes a floristic key to all vegetation types, a table showing the full local classification nested within the USNVC hierarchy, and a crosswalk showing the relationship between this and other classification systems.
  • The Vascular Plants of British Columbia Part 1 - Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons (Aceraceae Through Cucurbitaceae)

    The Vascular Plants of British Columbia Part 1 - Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons (Aceraceae Through Cucurbitaceae)

    The Vascular Plants of British Columbia Part 1 - Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons (Aceraceae through Cucurbitaceae) by George W. Douglas1, Gerald B. Straley2 and Del Meidinger3 1 George Douglas 2 Gerald Straley 3 Del Meidinger 6200 North Road Botanical Garden Research Branch R.R.#2 University of British Columbia B.C. Ministry of Forests Duncan, B.C. V9L 1N9 6501 S.W. Marine Drive 31 Bastion Square Vancouver, B.C. V6T 1Z4 Victoria, B. C. V8W 3E7 April 1989 Ministry of Forests THE VASCULAR PLANTS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Part 1 - Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons (Aceraceae through Cucurbitaceae) Contributors: Dr. G.W. Douglas, Douglas Ecological Consultants Ltd., Duncan, B.C. — Aceraceae through Betulaceae Brassicaceae (except Arabis, Cardamine and Rorippa) through Cucurbitaceae. Mr. D. Meidinger, Research Branch, B.C. Ministry of Forests, Victoria, B.C. — Gymnosperms. Dr. G.B. Straley, Botanical Garden, University of B.C., Vancouver, B.C. — Boraginaceae, Arabis and Rorippa. With the cooperation of the Royal British Columbia Museum and the Botanical University of British Columbia. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We are grateful to Dr. G.A. Allen for providing valuable suggestions during the initial stages of the project. Thanks are also due to Drs. G.A. Allen, A. Ceska and F. Ganders for reviewing taxonomically difficult groups. Mrs. O. Ceska reviewed the final draft of Part 1. Mr. G. Mulligan kindly searched the DAO herbarium and provided information on Brassicaceae. Dr. G. Argus helped with records from CAN. Louise Gronmyr and Jean Stringer kindly typed most of the contributions and helped in many ways in the production of the final manuscript which was typeset by Beth Collins.
  • Vascular Plants of Humboldt Bay's Dunes and Wetlands Published by U.S

    Vascular Plants of Humboldt Bay's Dunes and Wetlands Published by U.S

    Vascular Plants of Humboldt Bay's Dunes and Wetlands Published by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service G. Leppig and A. Pickart and California Department of Fish Game Release 4.0 June 2014* www.fws.gov/refuge/humboldt_bay/ Habitat- Habitat - Occurs on Species Status Occurs within Synonyms Common name specific broad Lanphere- Jepson Manual (2012) (see codes at end) refuge (see codes at end) (see codes at end) Ma-le'l Units UD PW EW Adoxaceae Sambucus racemosa L. red elderberry RF, CDF, FS X X N X X Aizoaceae Carpobrotus chilensis (Molina) sea fig DM X E X X N.E. Br. Carpobrotus edulis ( L.) N.E. Br. Iceplant DM X E, I X Alismataceae lanceleaf water Alisma lanceolatum With. FM X E plantain northern water Alisma triviale Pursh FM X N plantain Alliaceae three-cornered Allium triquetrum L. FS, FM, DM X X E leek Allium unifolium Kellogg one-leaf onion CDF X N X X Amaryllidaceae Amaryllis belladonna L. belladonna lily DS, AW X X E Narcissus pseudonarcissus L. daffodil AW, DS, SW X X E X Anacardiaceae Toxicodendron diversilobum Torrey poison oak CDF, RF X X N X X & A. Gray (E. Greene) Apiaceae Angelica lucida L. seacoast angelica BM X X N, C X X Anthriscus caucalis M. Bieb bur chevril DM X E Cicuta douglasii (DC.) J. Coulter & western water FM X N Rose hemlock Conium maculatum L. poison hemlock RF, AW X I X Daucus carota L. Queen Anne's lace AW, DM X X I X American wild Daucus pusillus Michaux DM, SW X X N X X carrot Foeniculum vulgare Miller sweet fennel AW, FM, SW X X I X Glehnia littoralis (A.
  • Subsidence Occurring in Mining Regions and a Case Study of Zonguldak-Kozlu Basin

    Subsidence Occurring in Mining Regions and a Case Study of Zonguldak-Kozlu Basin

    Scientific Research and Essays Vol. 6(6), pp. 1317-1327, 18 March, 2011 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/SRE DOI: 10.5897/SRE10.1017 ISSN 1992-2248 ©2011 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Subsidence occurring in mining regions and a case study of Zonguldak-Kozlu basin Eray Can*, Cetin Mekik, Senol Kuscu and Hakan Akçin Department of Geodesy and Photogrammetry Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Karaelmas University, Zonguldak, Turkey. Accepted 9 March, 2011 Mining conducted underground causes displacements and deformations in the ground and on the surface, also called mining subsidence, depending upon mining methods and geological factors, and can eventually bring about damages and destruction on buildings and amenities on the surface. These damages and destructions can adversely affect the development of cities and city life, and can emerge as a result of on-going mining activities due to active subsidence effect, as well as post mining production with residual subsidence effects. City of Zonguldak and its town Kozlu and its near surroundings constitute the centre for hard coal basin which has been under heavy mining activities for 160 years. Hence, the mining activities comprise one of the main economical incomes and the mining subsidence affects land ownership, land use, planning, structuring, in short every aspect of life in the region. This study details the damaging vertical displacements resultant of mining subsidence in the region and the solution suggestions, in an attempt to improve these unfavorable effects, along with the results obtained from the leveling works. Key words: Deformation, displacement, mining subsidence, urbanization, Zonguldak hard coal basin.
  • The Mineral Industry of Turkey in 2016

    The Mineral Industry of Turkey in 2016

    2016 Minerals Yearbook TURKEY [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior January 2020 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of Turkey By Sinan Hastorun Turkey’s mineral industry produced primarily metals and decreases for illite, 72%; refined copper (secondary) and nickel industrial minerals; mineral fuel production consisted mainly (mine production, Ni content), 50% each; bentonite, 44%; of coal and refined petroleum products. In 2016, Turkey was refined copper (primary), 36%; manganese (mine production, the world’s leading producer of boron, accounting for 74% Mn content), 35%; kaolin and nitrogen, 32% each; diatomite, of world production (excluding that of the United States), 29%; bituminous coal and crushed stone, 28% each; chromite pumice and pumicite (39%), and feldspar (23%). It was also the (mine production), 27%; dolomite, 18%; leonardite, 16%; salt, 2d-ranked producer of magnesium compounds (10% excluding 15%; gold (mine production, Au content), 14%; silica, 13%; and U.S. production), 3d-ranked producer of perlite (19%) and lead (mine production, Pb content) and talc, 12% each (table 1; bentonite (17%), 4th-ranked producer of chromite ore (9%), Maden İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü, 2018b). 5th-ranked producer of antimony (3%) and cement (2%), 7th-ranked producer of kaolin (5%), 8th-ranked producer of raw Structure of the Mineral Industry steel (2%), and 10th-ranked producer of barite (2%) (table 1; Turkey’s industrial minerals and metals production was World Steel Association, 2017, p. 9; Bennett, 2018; Bray, 2018; undertaken mainly by privately owned companies. The Crangle, 2018a, b; Fenton, 2018; Klochko, 2018; McRae, 2018; Government’s involvement in the mineral industry was Singerling, 2018; Tanner, 2018; van Oss, 2018; West, 2018).
  • Washington Flora Checklist a Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium

    Washington Flora Checklist a Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium

    Washington Flora Checklist A checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium The Washington Flora Checklist aims to be a complete list of the native and naturalized vascular plants of Washington State, with current classifications, nomenclature and synonymy. The checklist currently contains 3,929 terminal taxa (species, subspecies, and varieties). Taxa included in the checklist: * Native taxa whether extant, extirpated, or extinct. * Exotic taxa that are naturalized, escaped from cultivation, or persisting wild. * Waifs (e.g., ballast plants, escaped crop plants) and other scarcely collected exotics. * Interspecific hybrids that are frequent or self-maintaining. * Some unnamed taxa in the process of being described. Family classifications follow APG IV for angiosperms, PPG I (J. Syst. Evol. 54:563?603. 2016.) for pteridophytes, and Christenhusz et al. (Phytotaxa 19:55?70. 2011.) for gymnosperms, with a few exceptions. Nomenclature and synonymy at the rank of genus and below follows the 2nd Edition of the Flora of the Pacific Northwest except where superceded by new information. Accepted names are indicated with blue font; synonyms with black font. Native species and infraspecies are marked with boldface font. Please note: This is a working checklist, continuously updated. Use it at your discretion. Created from the Washington Flora Checklist Database on September 17th, 2018 at 9:47pm PST. Available online at http://biology.burke.washington.edu/waflora/checklist.php Comments and questions should be addressed to the checklist administrators: David Giblin ([email protected]) Peter Zika ([email protected]) Suggested citation: Weinmann, F., P.F. Zika, D.E. Giblin, B.