DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal and State Endangered and Threatened Species Expenditures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal and State Endangered and Threatened Species Expenditures FEDERAL AND STATE ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES EXPENDITURES Fiscal Year 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES EXPENDITURES FISCAL YEAR 2017 PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND .....................................................................................................................4 SECTION 18(1), FEDERAL EXPENDITURES ....................................................................5 SECTION 18(2), STATE EXPENDITURES ..........................................................................5 SUMMARY OF DATA ...........................................................................................................5 COMPARISON TO PREVIOUS REPORTS ..........................................................................6 Table 1. FY 2017 Reported Expenditures for Endangered and Threatened Species…………….7 Table 2. Species Ranked in Descending Order of Total FY 2017 Reported Expenditures….....58 Table 3. FY 2017 Reported Land Acquisition Expenditures for Endangered and Threatened Species……………………………………………………………...121 Table 4. FY 2017 Expenditures Reported by Individual Federal Agencies and the States…...133 Appendix A. Supplemental Guidance for Reporting Expenditures for the Conservation of Endangered and Threatened Species…………………………………………..…….136 Appendix B. Reports Provided by Other Federal Agencies……………………………..……141 Appendix C. Expenditures Reported by the States…………………………………………....421 ENDANGERED SPECIES EXPENDITURES FISCAL YEAR 2017 PURPOSE The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) (Act) was reauthorized and amended on October 7, 1988, under Public Law 100-478. A new section 18 was added to the Act that requires the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on behalf of the Secretary of the Interior to report annually on certain expenditures on a species-by-species basis. The section reads: SEC. 18. On or before January 15, 1990, and each January 15 thereafter, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Fish and Wildlife Service, shall submit to the Congress an annual report covering the preceding fiscal year which shall contain (1) the accounting on a species-by-species basis of all reasonably identifiable Federal expenditures made primarily for the conservation of endangered or threatened species pursuant to this Act; and (2) an accounting on a species-by-species basis of all reasonably identifiable expenditures made primarily for the conservation of endangered or threatened species pursuant to this Act by States receiving grants under section 6. This document constitutes the 28th report by the Service pursuant to the requirements of section 18 of the Act. The report covers fiscal year 2017 (October 1, 2016 - September 30, 2017), although some States may be reporting for a different fiscal year period (without duplicating a previous year's reported data). To assist Federal and State agencies with more accurate accounting of expenditures, a multi-species reporting category was added to the FY12 and subsequent reports. This option gives agencies another way to report expenditures when it is not possible to determine individual species costs for those species that are part of a multi-species conservation activity. The term "State" as used in this report is defined in section 3(17) of the Act to mean any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands. The term “State agency” as used in this report is defined in section 3(18) of the Act to mean any State agency, department, board, commission, or other governmental entity which is responsible for the management and conservation of fish, plant, or wildlife resources within a State. The term "conservation," as defined in section 3(3) of the Act, means the use of all methods and procedures necessary to bring any endangered or threatened species to the point where the measures provided for by the Act are no longer necessary--including, but not limited to, research, census, law enforcement, habitat acquisition and maintenance, propagation, live trapping, and transplantation. For the purposes of this report, the definition of conservation is further expanded to include any and all actions taken by Federal and State agencies on behalf of threatened or endangered species listed pursuant to the Act. 3 BACKGROUND At the time the reporting requirement was enacted by Congress, the Service determined that a good faith effort was expected to develop methods to track and obtain data that are "reasonably identifiable." No extensive or extraordinary measures to develop exceptionally precise data were sought, nor were the reporting agencies expected to prorate staff salaries and other normal operational and maintenance costs not directed toward a particular species. The expenditures reported in this and the preceding reports do not necessarily constitute all expenditures made for each species. This report represents a compilation of reasonably identifiable expenditures for the conservation of listed species reported independently by Federal and State agencies. Expenditures for FY 2017 are reported for 1,685 domestic threatened and endangered species of the 1,772 domestic species that were listed under United States jurisdiction in 50 CFR Part 17 during FY 2017 up through September 30, 2017 (Tables 1 and 3). Expenditures are identified by listed entity, which may be a species1, subspecies2, Distinct Population Segment (DPS)3, or Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU)4, as identified in the Act’s implementing regulations at 50 CFR 17.11 and 17.12. These expenditures are reported separately for the Service and in aggregate for all other Federal agencies and the States (Tables 1 and 3). For these annual reports, the Service requests that all reporting agencies submit their data directly into our Web-based data entry system to ensure accuracy, consistency, and efficiency. At the time of submission, the reporting agencies certify that their information is accurate. The information provided in this report, pursuant to section 18 of the Endangered Species Act, is presented as it was submitted by these agencies. We do not verify an agency’s data after the data are submitted to us. In order to improve the Service’s efficiency in producing future editions of this report, the Service will no longer enter a reporting agency’s expenditures data into our Web- based system. All agencies must enter their own expenditures data into our Web-based system. Expenditures for candidate species or other species not listed in 50 CFR Part 17 as of the end of each fiscal year are not included in this report. In addition, other types of expenses that are not incurred primarily for the conservation of listed species, such as those for litigation, are not reported. 1 Species For purposes of the ESA, this term includes any species or subspecies of fish or wildlife or plants, and any Distinct Population Segment of any species of vertebrate fish or wildlife that interbreeds when mature. 2 Subspecies A taxonomic rank below that of species, usually recognizing individuals that have certain heritable characteristics distinct from other subspecies of a species. 3 Distinct Population Segment A subdivision of a vertebrate species that is treated as a species for purposes of listing under the Endangered Species Act. 4 Evolutionarily Significant Unit A Pacific salmonid stock that is substantially reproductively isolated from other stocks of the same species and which represents an important part of the evolutionary legacy of the species; functionally equivalent to DPS for the purpose of listing under ESA. 4 SECTION 18(1), FEDERAL EXPENDITURES Expenditures Reported by the Fish and Wildlife Service The Service's operational categories of expenditures include fisheries, refuges, land acquisition, law enforcement, research, international conservation, and regional and field office operations for listing, recovery, consultation, migratory birds, and grants. All reasonably identifiable expenditures that could be attributed to individual species within these activities have been included. The Federal assistance portion under section 6 of the Act for each species is included in the FWS Total in Table 1. The State share for each species for which a Federal contribution was made is included in the States Total column of Table 1. A portion of the Service's funds for consultation, listing, and recovery are incorporated into salaries, operations, and maintenance costs. If these costs contributed to the conservation of listed species and are reasonably identifiable to specific species, they are included in this report. Expenditures Reported by other Federal Agencies The Director of the Service sends a request to other Federal agencies identified as likely to have species-specific expenditures under the Act to report for each fiscal year. The Service provides guidance identifying what constitutes reasonably identifiable expenditures and how these are to be reported (Appendix A). For FY 2017, the Service and 27 other Federal agencies identified expenditures for the conservation of individual threatened and endangered species. Results from all responding Federal agencies are included in Appendix B. The data identified by those responding Federal agencies for individual species and multi-species conservation activities are tabulated in the “Other Fed” columns
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "Pollinator Paradise" Garden at Chatham Mills
    "Pollinator Paradise" Garden at Chatham Mills Created by Debbie Roos, North Carolina Cooperative Extension 206 species, 85% of them native to North Carolina More info at www.carolinapollinatorgarden.org Common Name Scientific Name Origin Perennial Flowers Yarrow Achillea millefolium 'Moonshine' NC Yarrow Achillea millefolium 'Paprika' NC Mexican giant hyssop Agastache mexicana 'Acapulco Orange' Mexico Anise hyssop Agastache x 'Blue Fortune' hybrid of U.S. native Mexican hyssop Agastache x 'Grape Nectar' Mexico Hummingbird mint Agastache x 'Red Happiness' southwest U.S. Licorice hyssop Agastache rupestris southwest U.S. Nodding onion Allium cernuum NC Dwarf indigo bush Amorpha herbacea NC Arkansas bluestar Amsonia hubrichtii Arkansas, Oklahoma Bluestar Amsonia tabernaemontana NC Tall anemone Anemone virginiana NC Eastern wild columbine Aquilegia canadensis NC Golden columbine Aquilegia chrysantha southwest U.S. Common leopardbane Arnica acaulis NC Swamp milkweed Asclepias incarnata NC Purple milkweed Asclepias purpurascens NC Common Name Scientific Name Origin Red milkweed Asclepias rubra NC Common milkweed Asclepias syriaca NC Butterfly weed Asclepias tuberosa NC Redring milkweed Asclepias variegata NC Whorled milkweed Asclepias verticillata NC Dwarf Tartarian aster Aster tataricus 'Jin Dai' exotic Wild indigo Baptisia x 'Carolina Moonlight' NC Wild indigo Baptisia x 'Purple Smoke' NC White wild indigo Baptisia alba NC Dwarf wild indigo Baptisia minor NC Downy wood mint Blephilia ciliata NC Decurrent false aster Boltonia decurrens central U.S. Bush's poppy mallow Callirhoe bushii central U.S. Fringed poppy mallow Callirhoe digitata central U.S. Prairie poppy mallow Callirhoe involucrata central U.S. Clustered poppy mallow Callirhoe triangulata NC Pink turtlehead Chelone lyonii NC Maryland golden aster Chrysopis mariana NC Field thistle Cirsium discolor NC Curlyheads Clematis ochroleuca NC Wild ageratum/mistflower Conoclinium coelestinum NC Palmleaf thoroughwort Conoclinium greggii southwest U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Presence and Distribution of 23 Hawaiian Yellow-Faced Bee Species on Lands Adjacent to Military Installations on O‘Ahu and Hawai‘I Island
    The Hawai`i-Pacific Islands Cooperative Ecosystems Studies Unit & Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI`I AT MĀNOA Dr. David C. Duffy, Unit Leader Department of Botany 3190 Maile Way, St. John #408 Honolulu, Hawai’i 96822 Technical Report 185 Assessing the presence and distribution of 23 Hawaiian yellow-faced bee species on lands adjacent to military installations on O‘ahu and Hawai‘i Island September 2013 Karl N. Magnacca1 and Cynthia B. K. King 2 1 Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Department of Botany, 3190 Maile Way Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822 2 Hawaii Division of Forestry & Wildlife Native Invertebrate Program 1151 Punchbowl Street, Room 325 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 PCSU is a cooperative program between the University of Hawai`i and U.S. National Park Service, Cooperative Ecological Studies Unit. Author Contact Information: Karl N. Magnacca. Phone: 808-554-5637 Email: [email protected] Hawaii Division of Forestry & Wildlife Native Invertebrate Program 1151 Punchbowl Street, Room 325 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813. Recommended Citation: Magnacca, K.N. and C.B.K. King. 2013. Assessing the presence and distribution of 23 Hawaiian yellow- faced bee species on lands adjacent to military installations on O‘ahu and Hawai‘i Island. Technical Report No. 185. Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit, University of Hawai‘i, Honolulu, Hawai‘i. 39 pp. Key words: Hylaeus, Colletidae, Apoidea, Hymenoptera, bees, insect conservation Place key words: Oahu, Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, Puu Waawaa, Mauna Kea, Pohakuloa, North Kona Editor: David C. Duffy, PCSU Unit Leader (Email: [email protected]) Series Editor: Clifford W. Morden, PCSU Deputy Director (Email: [email protected]) About this technical report series: This technical report series began in 1973 with the formation of the Cooperative National Park Resources Studies Unit at the University of Hawai'i at Mānoa.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Report of the Biology of the Genus Charpentiera (Amaranthaceae) I
    Pacific Science (1973), Vol. 27, No.4, p. 399-405 Printed in Great Britain A Preliminary Report of the Biology of the Genus Charpentiera (Amaranthaceae) I S. H. SOHMER 2 ABSTRACT: The genus Charpentiera (Amaranthaceae), found in the Hawaiian and Austral archipelagoes, has a structurally gynodioecious but functionally dioecious breeding system. The sex ratio varies from taxon to taxon within the genus. The sex-determining mechanism is unknown. A high rate ofovule sterility is found in all the taxa, which i~ not predicted by the pollen sterility figures reported. Data concern­ ing seed size, pollen size, and seed germination potential are provided. Hybridization is demonstrated to occur between Charpentiera densiflora Sohmer and C. elliptica (Hilleb.) Heller. Reproductive isolation is reported for C. tomentosa var. tomentosa Sohmer and C. obovata Gaud. THE GENUS Charpentiera is indigenous to the often small and thinly scattered throughout the Hawaiian Islands. In 1934 it was also found mature ecosystems of the generic range. Popu­ on two of the Austral Islands approximately lations of several of the taxa, however, are 2,800 miles disjunct from Hawaii (Suessenguth sometimes numerous in certain areas such as 1936). The members of the genus are trees the heads of deep gulches in some of the highly ranging from about 8 to 40 feet high and are dissected volcanic ranges of the islands. During of diverse habit, with pendant, compound the course of the revision, the reproductive panicles of minute, anemophilous flowers. The biology of Charpentiera was investigated. fruit is indehiscent and uniovulate. A recent systematic revision of Charpentiera (Sohmer 1972) has recognized six major taxa in the SEX RATIO AND TENDENCY TO DIOECISM genus.
    [Show full text]
  • Urera Kaalae
    Plants Opuhe Urera kaalae SPECIES STATUS: Federally Listed as Endangered Genetic Safety Net Species J.K.Obata©Smithsonian Inst., 2005 IUCN Red List Ranking – Critically Endangered (CR D) Hawai‘i Natural Heritage Ranking ‐ Critically Imperiled (G1) Endemism – O‘ahu Critical Habitat ‐ Designated SPECIES INFORMATION: Urera kaalae, a long‐lived perennial member of the nettle family (Urticaceae), is a small tree or shrub 3 to 7 m (10 to 23 ft) tall. This species can be distinguished from the other Hawaiian species of the genus by its heart‐shaped leaves. DISTRIBUTION: Found in the central to southern parts of the Wai‘anae Mountains on O‘ahu. ABUNDANCE: The nine remaining subpopulations comprise approximately 40 plants. LOCATION AND CONDITION OF KEY HABITAT: Urera kaalae typically grows on slopes and in gulches in diverse mesic forest at elevations of 439 to 1,074 m (1,440 to 3,523 ft). The last 12 known occurrences are found on both state and privately owned land. Associated native species include Alyxia oliviformis, Antidesma platyphyllum, Asplenium kaulfusii, Athyrium sp., Canavalia sp., Charpentiera sp., Chamaesyce sp., Claoxylon sandwicense, Diospyros hillebrandii, Doryopteris sp., Freycinetia arborea, Hedyotis acuminata, Hibiscus sp., Nestegis sandwicensis, Pipturus albidus, Pleomele sp., Pouteria sandwicensis, Psychotria sp., Senna gaudichaudii (kolomona), Streblus pendulinus, Urera glabra, and Xylosma hawaiiense. THREATS: Habitat degradation by feral pigs; Competition from alien plant species; Stochastic extinction; Reduced reproductive vigor due to the small number of remaining individuals. CONSERVATION ACTIONS: The goals of conservation actions are not only to protect current populations, but also to establish new populations to reduce the risk of extinction.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Q U a R T E R L Y N E W S L E T T E R December 2009 Volume 7 Number 2 of 4
    LOUISIANA NATURAL AREAS REGISTRY Q u a r t e r l y N e w s l e t t e r December 2009 Volume 7 Number 2 of 4 Working with landowners towards conservation of Louisiana’s ecologically sensitive lands http//www.Louisiana.gov/experience/natural heritage/naturalareasregistry/ Can you name this flower? See Page 6 for answer. NATURAL AREAS UPDATE They are considered together here due to their floristic similarity Amity Bass has joined the and/or similarity in management needs.) Louisiana Natural Cypress‐Tupelo‐Blackgum Swamps throughout the natural range are Heritage Program staff as forested alluvial swamps growing on intermittently exposed soils our new Community most commonly along rivers and streams but also occurring in back Ecologist. She is a native swamp depressions and swales. The soils are inundated or saturated of West Monroe in by surface water or ground water on a nearly permanent basis northeast Louisiana. throughout the growing season except during periods of extreme Amity received her drought. However, even deepwater swamps, with almost Bachelors in Biology from continuous flooding, experience seasonal fluctuations in water levels the University of (LNHP 1986‐2004). Baldcypress swamps generally occur on mucks Louisiana at Monroe and clays, and also silts and sands with underlying clay layers (ULM) in 2005 and her (Alfisols, Entisols, Histosols, and Inceptisols) (Conner and Buford undergraduate work 1998). focused on the nesting ecology of turtles on sandbars and Cypress‐Tupelo‐Blackgum swamps have relatively low floristic herpetofaunal (study of reptiles and amphibians) surveys on state diversity. Taxodium distichum (baldcypress) and Nyssa aquatica wildlife management areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 2, 1997 / Proposed Rules
    15646 Federal Register / Vol. 62, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 2, 1997 / Proposed Rules Public Comments Solicited received within 45 days of the date of Author: The primary author of this The Service intends that any final publication of the proposal in the document is Adam Asquith, Ecological action resulting from this proposal will Federal Register. Such requests must be Services, Pacific Islands Ecoregion, U.S. be as accurate and as effective as made in writing and be addressed to the Fish and Wildlife Service, 300 Ala possible. Therefore, comments or Ecoregion Manager (See ADDRESSES Moana Boulevard, Room 6307, P.O. Box suggestions from the public, other section). 50167, Honolulu, Hawaii 96850 (808/ 541±3441). concerned governmental agencies, the National Environmental Policy Act scientific community, industry, or any List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17 other interested party concerning this The Fish and Wildlife Service has proposed rule are hereby solicited. determined that Environmental Endangered and threatened species, Comments particularly are sought Assessments and Environmental Impact Exports, Imports, Reporting and concerningÐ Statements, as defined under the recordkeeping requirements, and (1) Biological, commercial trade, or authority of the National Environmental Transportation. other relevant data concerning threat (or Policy Act of 1969, need not be Proposed Regulation Promulgation lack thereof) to this species; prepared in connection with regulations (2) The location of any additional adopted pursuant to section 4(a) of the Accordingly, the Service hereby populations of this species and the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as proposes to amend part 17, subchapter reasons why any habitat should or amended. A notice outlining the B of chapter I, title 50 of the Code of should not be determined to be critical Service's reasons for this determination Federal Regulations, as set forth below: habitat as provided by section 4 of the was published in the Federal Register Act; on October 25, 1983 (48 FR 49244).
    [Show full text]
  • A Landscape-Based Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability for All Native Hawaiian Plants
    Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDscape-bASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMatE CHANGE VULNEraBILITY FOR ALL NatIVE HAWAIIAN PLANts Lucas Fortini1,2, Jonathan Price3, James Jacobi2, Adam Vorsino4, Jeff Burgett1,4, Kevin Brinck5, Fred Amidon4, Steve Miller4, Sam `Ohukani`ohi`a Gon III6, Gregory Koob7, and Eben Paxton2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawai‘i at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service —Ecological Services, Division of Climate Change and Strategic Habitat Management, Honolulu, HI 96850 5 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawai‘i National Park, HI 96718 6 The Nature Conservancy, Hawai‘i Chapter, Honolulu, HI 96817 7 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Hawaii/Pacific Islands Area State Office, Honolulu, HI 96850 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawai‘i at Hilo 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 933-0706 November 2013 This product was prepared under Cooperative Agreement CAG09AC00070 for the Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center of the U.S. Geological Survey. Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDSCAPE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY FOR ALL NATIVE HAWAIIAN PLANTS LUCAS FORTINI1,2, JONATHAN PRICE3, JAMES JACOBI2, ADAM VORSINO4, JEFF BURGETT1,4, KEVIN BRINCK5, FRED AMIDON4, STEVE MILLER4, SAM ʽOHUKANIʽOHIʽA GON III 6, GREGORY KOOB7, AND EBEN PAXTON2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaiʽi National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawaiʽi at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.
    [Show full text]
  • An Additional Nomenclatural Transfer in the Pantropical Genus Myrsine (Primulaceae: Myrsinoideae) John J
    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Marine & Environmental Sciences Faculty Articles Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences 9-13-2018 An Additional Nomenclatural Transfer in the Pantropical Genus Myrsine (Primulaceae: Myrsinoideae) John J. Pipoly III Broward County Parks & Recreation Division; Nova Southeastern University, [email protected] Jon M. Ricketson Missouri Botanical Garden Find out more information about Nova Southeastern University and the Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography. Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facarticles Part of the Marine Biology Commons, and the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons NSUWorks Citation John J. Pipoly III and Jon M. Ricketson. 2018. An Additional Nomenclatural Transfer in the Pantropical Genus Myrsine (Primulaceae: Myrsinoideae) .Novon , (3) : 287 -287. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_facarticles/942. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marine & Environmental Sciences Faculty Articles by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. An Additional Nomenclatural Transfer in the Pantropical Genus Myrsine (Primulaceae: Myrsinoideae) John J. Pipoly III Broward County Parks & Recreation Division, 950 NW 38th St., Oakland Park, Florida 33309, U.S.A.; Nova Southeastern University, 8000 N Ocean Dr., Dania Beach, Florida 33004, U.S.A. [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Jon M. Ricketson Missouri Botanical Garden, 4344 Shaw Blvd., St. Louis, Missouri 63110, U.S.A. [email protected] ABSTRACT. Rapanea pellucidostriata Gilg & Schellenb. TYPE: Democratic Republic of the Congo. Ruwen- is transferred to Myrsine L.
    [Show full text]
  • Verdeca 011718 Draft Hi Yield Soy Bean EA
    Verdeca Petition (17-223-01p) for Determination of Nonregulated Status for HB4 Soybean (Event IND- 00410-5) Genetically Engineered for Increased Yield and Resistance to Glufosinate-Ammonium OECD Unique Identifier: IND-00410-5 Final Environmental Assessment May 2019 Agency Contact Cindy Eck Biotechnology Regulatory Services 4700 River Road USDA, APHIS Riverdale, MD 20737 Fax: (301) 734-8669 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’S TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326–W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call (202) 720–5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Mention of companies or commercial products in this report does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture over others not mentioned. USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of any product mentioned. Product names are mentioned solely to report factually on available data and to provide specific information. This publication reports research involving pesticides. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies before they can be recommended. i ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Using Community Group Monitoring Data to Measure The
    25 Using Community Group Monitoring Data To Measure The Effectiveness Of Restoration Actions For Australia's Woodland Birds Michelle Gibson1, Jessica Walsh1,2, Nicki Taws5, Martine Maron1 1Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, 4072, Queensland, Australia, 2School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, 3800, Victoria, Australia, 3Greening Australia, Aranda, Canberra, 2614 Australian Capital Territory, Australia, 4BirdLife Australia, Carlton, Melbourne, 3053, Victoria, Australia, 5Greening Australia, PO Box 538 Jamison Centre, Macquarie, Australian Capital Territory 2614, Australia Before conservation actions are implemented, they should be evaluated for their effectiveness to ensure the best possible outcomes. However, many conservation actions are not implemented under an experimental framework, making it difficult to measure their effectiveness. Ecological monitoring datasets provide useful opportunities for measuring the effect of conservation actions and a baseline upon which adaptive management can be built. We measure the effect of conservation actions on Australian woodland ecosystems using two community group-led bird monitoring datasets. Australia’s temperate woodlands have been largely cleared for agricultural production and their bird communities are in decline. To reverse these declines, a suite of conservation actions has been implemented by government and non- government agencies, and private landholders. We analysed the response of total woodland bird abundance, species richness, and community condition, to two widely-used actions — grazing exclusion and replanting. We recorded 139 species from 134 sites and 1,389 surveys over a 20-year period. Grazing exclusion and replanting combined had strong positive effects on all three bird community metrics over time relative to control sites, where no actions had occurred.
    [Show full text]