DOCSLIB.ORG

Four Mile Uranium Mine Program for Environment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Four Mile Uranium Mine Program for Environment Four Mile ML6402 – PEPR/RWMP 2013 FOUR MILE URANIUM MINE PROGRAM FOR ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND REHABILITATION, AND RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN August 2013 Four Mile joint venture between Quasar Resources Pty Mine owner Ltd and Alliance Craton Explorer Pty Ltd, managed by Quasar Resources Pty Ltd Project operator Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd Contact person Craig Bartels–President, Heathgate Contact details Suite 1, Level 4, 25 Grenfell Street, Adelaide SA 5000 Telephone: 08 8110 0500 Fax: 08 8212 5559 Tenement details ML 6402 Name of mining operation Four Mile Uranium Mine Commodity to be mined Uranium Preparation date 02 August 2013 Approval date See DMITRE Stamp Document number MP-01 Version 1.0 Prepared by Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd Suite 1, Level 4 25 Grenfell Street Adelaide SA 5000 Document Number ML Date Issued Page No. MP-FM01 Version 1.0 6402 02 August 2013 1 of 176 Four Mile ML6402 – PEPR/RWMP 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 General Description of the Mine ........................................................................................... 10 1.2 Background to the Plan ........................................................................................................ 10 1.3 Summary Description of the Land and Environment ............................................................ 10 1.4 Summary of Existing Operations .......................................................................................... 13 1.5 Summary of Proposed Operations ....................................................................................... 13 1.6 Additional Environmental Impacts Identified and Management Strategies ........................... 14 1.7 Summary table of risks, outcomes and measurement criteria .............................................. 14 1.8 Post-mine Land Use ............................................................................................................ 15 1.9 Mine Closure and Rehabilitation Strategies ......................................................................... 15 1.10 Mine Details ......................................................................................................................... 16 2 Description of the Natural, Social and Economic Environment .................................................... 18 2.1 Summary of Additional Information on the Existing Environment ......................................... 18 2.2 Baseline Radiation ............................................................................................................... 18 2.3 Expected Radionuclide Concentrations in the Process Stream ............................................ 22 2.4 Critical group dose assessment ........................................................................................... 22 3 Description of Mine Construction, Operation and Closure ........................................................... 25 3.1 General Description ............................................................................................................. 25 3.2 Ore Reserves and Market .................................................................................................... 25 3.3 Non-Production Drilling Activities ......................................................................................... 34 3.4 Mining Plan .......................................................................................................................... 35 3.5 Mining Operations ................................................................................................................ 38 3.6 Wellfield Domain .................................................................................................................. 39 3.7 Processing Plant Domain ..................................................................................................... 43 3.8 Supporting Surface Infrastructure ........................................................................................ 44 3.9 Solid Waste ......................................................................................................................... 45 3.10 Liquid Waste ........................................................................................................................ 45 3.11 Mine Closure ....................................................................................................................... 46 4 Results of Stakeholder Consultation ........................................................................................... 47 4.1 Identification of Stakeholders and their Views ...................................................................... 47 Document Number ML Date Issued Page No. MP-FM01 Version 1.0 6402 02 August 2013 3 of 176 Four Mile ML6402 – PEPR/RWMP 2013 4.2 Stakeholder Consultation Process and Results .................................................................... 47 5 Management of Environmental, Social and Economic risks ........................................................ 51 5.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................. 51 5.2 Applicable Legislation and Standards .................................................................................. 51 5.3 Impact Event Analysis .......................................................................................................... 51 5.4 Soil Aspects ......................................................................................................................... 66 5.5 Vegetation Aspects .............................................................................................................. 69 5.6 Surface Water Aspects ........................................................................................................ 75 5.7 Hydrogeological Aspects ..................................................................................................... 80 5.8 Fauna Aspects ..................................................................................................................... 95 5.9 Air Quality Aspects .............................................................................................................. 98 5.10 Heritage Aspects ............................................................................................................... 100 5.11 Third Party Aspects ........................................................................................................... 102 5.12 Radiological Aspects.......................................................................................................... 103 5.13 Waste Disposal Aspects .................................................................................................... 104 6 Mine Closure and Rehabilitation Plan ....................................................................................... 105 6.1 Baseline Data and Context ................................................................................................ 105 6.2 Stakeholder Involvement and Issues ................................................................................. 106 6.3 Scope of Domain ............................................................................................................... 106 6.4 Potential Social and Environmental Impacts ...................................................................... 106 6.5 General Standards ............................................................................................................. 107 6.6 Closure Outcomes and Criteria .......................................................................................... 108 6.7 Sustainable Closure Strategy ............................................................................................. 111 6.8 Closure Maps and Sections ............................................................................................... 111 6.9 Residual Risk Assessment................................................................................................. 111 6.10 Evaluation of Groundwater Status Leading to and Following Closure ................................ 111 6.11 Closure Cost Estimate ....................................................................................................... 122 6.12 Mine Closure Schedule ...................................................................................................... 122 7 Management Systems and Capability ....................................................................................... 124 7.1 Management Commitment ................................................................................................. 124 7.2 Environment Management System .................................................................................... 125 Document Number ML Date Issued Page No. MP-FM01 Version 1.0 6402 02 August 2013 4 of 176 Four Mile ML6402 – PEPR/RWMP 2013 7.3 Planning............................................................................................................................. 125 7.4 Previous Experience of Operator ....................................................................................... 133 7.5 SA EPA 2004 Review ........................................................................................................ 133 8 Radioactive Waste Management Plan .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Situ Leach (ISL) Mining of Uranium
    In Situ Leach (ISL) Mining of Uranium (June 2009) l Most uranium mining in the USA and Kazakhstan is now by in situ leach methods, also known as in situ recovery (ISR). l In USA ISL is seen as the most cost effective and environmentally acceptable method of mining, and Australian experience supports this. l Australia's first ISL uranium mine is Beverley, which started operation late in 2000. The proposal for Honeymoon has government approval and it is expected to be operating in 2008. Conventional mining involves removing mineralised rock (ore) from the ground, breaking it up and treating it to remove the minerals being sought. In situ leaching (ISL), also known as solution mining, or in situ recovery (ISR) in North America, involves leaving the ore where it is in the ground, and recovering the minerals from it by dissolving them and pumping the pregnant solution to the surface where the minerals can be recovered. Consequently there is little surface disturbance and no tailings or waste rock generated. However, the orebody needs to be permeable to the liquids used, and located so that they do not contaminate ground water away from the orebody. Uranium ISL uses the native groundwater in the orebody which is fortified with a complexing agent and in most cases an oxidant. It is then pumped through the underground orebody to recover the minerals in it by leaching. Once the pregnant solution is returned to the surface, the uranium is recovered in much the same way as in any other uranium plant (mill). In Australian ISL mines (Beverley and the soon to be opened Honeymoon Mine) the oxidant used is hydrogen peroxide and the complexing agent sulfuric acid.
    [Show full text]
  • About Uranium Mining in South Australia Foreword
    The Facts about uranium mining in South Australia Foreword South Australia has been a major producer of uranium since 1988. We are proud of our track record and our global reputation for excellence. The South Australian Government thoroughly To achieve that aim we need to challenge assess mining lease proposals, and through the perceptions of unacceptable hazards stringent conditions, rigorously upholds the associated with the uranium industry. Risks highest standards for monitoring and safety. associated with nuclear energy are judged harsher than competing energy sources. The enduring strength of this State’s leadership in uranium mining is an insistence Access to information and education is on world’s best practice for managing our the key to challenging these perceptions. resources. Uranium – The Facts is just that, the facts that should be the basis for any informed debate Our global reputation enables us to attract about uranium and South Australia’s current the world’s leading uranium miners and role in the global nuclear fuel cycle. lead the country in annual production. Uranium produced in South Australia is equivalent to delivering CO2-free power to 20 million people. Yet with more than 80% of Australia’s total Hon Tom Koutsantonis MP, uranium resource, there remains considerable Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy scope to expand. It’s not enough that we produce exports from the world’s largest uranium deposit at Olympic Dam, we want to unlock the full potential of all South Australia’s uranium assets. How we regulate The Foreign Investment Review The Australian regulatory framework Board examines foreign investment for the uranium industry is widely proposals to ensure the investment is recognised as world’s best practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Agency, Institutionalisation and Survival
    2q' t '9à ABORIGINAL AGENCY, INSTITUTIONALISATION AND PEGGY BROCK B. A. (Hons) Universit¡r of Adelaide Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History/Geography, University of Adelaide March f99f ll TAT}LE OF CONTENTS ii LIST OF TAE}LES AND MAPS iii SUMMARY iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . vii ABBREVIATIONS ix C}IAPTER ONE. INTRODUCTION I CFIAPTER TWO. TI{E HISTORICAL CONTEXT IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA 32 CHAPTER THREE. POONINDIE: HOME AWAY FROM COUNTRY 46 POONINDIE: AN trSTä,TILISHED COMMUNITY AND ITS DESTRUCTION 83 KOONIBBA: REFUGE FOR TI{E PEOPLE OF THE VI/EST COAST r22 CFIAPTER SIX. KOONIBBA: INSTITUTIONAL UPHtrAVAL AND ADJUSTMENT t70 C}IAPTER SEVEN. DISPERSAL OF KOONIBBA PEOPLE AND THE END OF TI{E MISSION ERA T98 CTIAPTER EIGHT. SURVTVAL WITHOUT INSTITUTIONALISATION236 C}IAPTER NINtr. NEPABUNNA: THtr MISSION FACTOR 268 CFIAPTER TEN. AE}ORIGINAL AGENCY, INSTITUTIONALISATION AND SURVTVAL 299 BIBLIOGRAPI{Y 320 ltt TABLES AND MAPS Table I L7 Table 2 128 Poonindie location map opposite 54 Poonindie land tenure map f 876 opposite 114 Poonindie land tenure map f 896 opposite r14 Koonibba location map opposite L27 Location of Adnyamathanha campsites in relation to pastoral station homesteads opposite 252 Map of North Flinders Ranges I93O opposite 269 lv SUMMARY The institutionalisation of Aborigines on missions and government stations has dominated Aboriginal-non-Aboriginal relations. Institutionalisation of Aborigines, under the guise of assimilation and protection policies, was only abandoned in.the lg7Os. It is therefore important to understand the implications of these policies for Aborigines and Australian society in general. I investigate the affect of institutionalisation on Aborigines, questioning the assumption tl.at they were passive victims forced onto missions and government stations and kept there as virtual prisoners.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkaroola Protection Area: a Field Guide to Selected Geological Features
    Arkaroola Protection Area: A field guide to selected geological features Graeme L. Worboys and Stephen B. Hore arkaroola.com.au environment.sa.gov.au Citation: Worboys, G. L. and Hore, S.B. (2013) Arkaroola Protection Area: A field guide to selected geological features. Arkaroola Wilderness Sanctuary and Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Adelaide. Copyright: © This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Australian Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process, nor may any other exclusive right be exercised without the express permission of the authors. Acknowledgements: Many individuals and organisations contributed to the development of this Field Guide. The text has been sourced predominantly from the Arkaroola National Heritage Listing nomination jointly submitted to the Australian Government by the South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources and Margaret and Douglas Sprigg of the Arkaroola Wilderness Sanctuary. Appreciation is expressed for the use of this material. The Field Guide also sourced technical geological quotes from a 2004 field guide developed by John Drexel and Stephen Hore and appreciation is extended for the use of this material. Thanks are particularly extended to Margaret and Douglas Sprigg, Lorraine Edmunds and Dennis Walter of Arkaroola Wilderness Sanctuary; Jason Irving of the South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources; Tim Baker of the Geological Survey of South Australia; the Geological Society of Australia (South Australia Division); Jim Gehling and Joël Brugger of the South Australian Museum; the University of Adelaide; Malcolm William Wallace of the University of Melbourne; Malcolm Walter of the University of New South Wales; Narelle Neumann of Geoscience Australia; and Paul O’Brien of Helivista Helicopters (South Australia) for their assistance in the development of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Pages on U Mining by End of October, See Pol D
    URANIUM MINING IN AUSTRALIA Friends of the Earth, Australia foe.org.au/anti-nuclear January 2013 With Australia holding 30-40% of the world's uranium mining was overturned in 2012. In WA, known conventional uranium reserves, the the Liberal government supports uranium mining uranium mining industry hopes to significantly but the Labor opposition opposes any new increase production. However the Coalition uranium mines (but might permit mines that have government, in power from 1996-2007, succeeded received prior approvals). In NSW, the Liberal in establishing only one new mine. The Beverley government supports uranium exploration but has mine in South Australia began commercial not (yet) moved to permit uranium mining. production in 2001. The tiny Honeymoon mine in SA began production in 2011 but in May 2012 joint A 2003 report by a federal Senate References and venture partner Mitsui announced that it was Legislation Committee found "a pattern of under- withdrawing from the Honeymoon project as it performance and non-compliance" in the uranium "could not foresee sufficient economic return from mining industry. It identified many gaps in the project." knowledge and found an absence of reliable data on which to measure the extent of contamination As at January 2013, there is bipartisan support for from the uranium mining industry, and it uranium mining at the federal level and in SA and concluded that changes were necessary "in order the NT. In Queensland, a long-standing ban on to protect the environment and its inhabitants from serious or irreversible damage". The history of secret nuclear weapons research, and committee concluded "that short-term states stockpiling 'civil' plutonium.
    [Show full text]
  • Place Names of South Australia: W
    W Some of our names have apparently been given to the places by drunken bushmen andfrom our scrupulosity in interfering with the liberty of the subject, an inflection of no light character has to be borne by those who come after them. SheaoakLog ispassable... as it has an interesting historical association connectedwith it. But what shall we say for Skillogolee Creek? Are we ever to be reminded of thin gruel days at Dotheboy’s Hall or the parish poor house. (Register, 7 October 1861, page 3c) Wabricoola - A property North -East of Black Rock; see pastoral lease no. 1634. Waddikee - A town, 32 km South-West of Kimba, proclaimed on 14 July 1927, took its name from the adjacent well and rock called wadiki where J.C. Darke was killed by Aborigines on 24 October 1844. Waddikee School opened in 1942 and closed in 1945. Aboriginal for ‘wattle’. ( See Darke Peak, Pugatharri & Koongawa, Hundred of) Waddington Bluff - On section 98, Hundred of Waroonee, probably recalls James Waddington, described as an ‘overseer of Waukaringa’. Wadella - A school near Tumby Bay in the Hundred of Hutchison opened on 1 July 1914 by Jessie Ormiston; it closed in 1926. Wadjalawi - A tea tree swamp in the Hundred of Coonarie, west of Point Davenport; an Aboriginal word meaning ‘bull ant water’. Wadmore - G.W. Goyder named Wadmore Hill, near Lyndhurst, after George Wadmore, a survey employee who was born in Plymouth, England, arrived in the John Woodall in 1849 and died at Woodside on 7 August 1918. W.R. Wadmore, Mayor of Campbelltown, was honoured in 1972 when his name was given to Wadmore Park in Maryvale Road, Campbelltown.
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities (Prohibitions) Repeal Bill 2019
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL STANDING COMMITTEE ON STATE DEVELOPMENT Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities (Prohibitions) Repeal Bill 2019 Report 46 March 2020 www.parliament.nsw.gov.au LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Standing Committee on State Development Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities (Prohibitions) Repeal Bill 2019 Ordered to be printed 4 March 2020 according to Standing Order 231 Report 46 - March 2020 i LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities (Prohibitions) Repeal Bill 2019 New South Wales Parliamentary Library cataloguing-in-publication data: New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council. Standing Committee on State Development. Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities (Prohibitions) Repeal Bill 2019 / Standing Committee on State Development. [Sydney, N.S.W.] : the Committee, 2020. – [xiv, 150] pages ; 30 cm. (Report no. 46 / Standing Committee on State Development) Chair: Hon. Taylor Martin, MLC. “March 2020” ISBN 9781920788599 1. New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council—Uranium Mining and Nuclear Facilities (Prohibitions) Repeal Bill 2018. 2. Uranium mines and mining—Law and legislation—New South Wales. 3. Nuclear industry—Law and legislation—New South Wales. 4. Nuclear energy—Law and legislation—New South Wales. I. Martin, Taylor. II. Title. III. Series: New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council. Standing Committee on State Development. Report ; no. 46 622.349 (DDC22) ii Report 46 - March 2020 STANDING COMMITTEE ON STATE DEVELOPMENT Table of contents Terms of reference vi Committee details vii Chair’s foreword
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources Management District Groups
    South Australian Arid Lands NRM Region NNAATTUURRAALL RREESSOOUURRCCEESS MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT DDIISSTTRRIICCTT GGRROOUUPPSS NORTHERN TERRITORY QUEENSLAND Mount Dare H.S. CROWN POINT Pandie Pandie HS AYERS SIMPSON DESERT RANGE SOUTH Tieyon H.S. CONSERVATION PARK ALTON DOWNS TIEYON WITJIRA NATIONAL PARK PANDIE PANDIE CORDILLO DOWNS HAMILTON DEROSE HILL Hamilton H.S. SIMPSON DESERT KENMORE REGIONAL RESERVE Cordillo Downs HS PARK Lambina H.S. Mount Sarah H.S. MOUNT Granite Downs H.S. SARAH Indulkana LAMBINA Todmorden H.S. MACUMBA CLIFTON HILLS GRANITE DOWNS TODMORDEN COONGIE LAKES Marla NATIONAL PARK Mintabie EVERARD PARK Welbourn Hill H.S. WELBOURN HILL Marla - Oodnadatta INNAMINCKA ANANGU COWARIE REGIONAL PITJANTJATJARAKU Oodnadatta RESERVE ABORIGINAL LAND ALLANDALE Marree - Innamincka Wintinna HS WINTINNA KALAMURINA Innamincka ARCKARINGA Algebuckinna Arckaringa HS MUNGERANIE EVELYN Mungeranie HS DOWNS GIDGEALPA THE PEAKE Moomba Evelyn Downs HS Mount Barry HS MOUNT BARRY Mulka HS NILPINNA MULKA LAKE EYRE NATIONAL MOUNT WILLOUGHBY Nilpinna HS PARK MERTY MERTY Etadunna HS STRZELECKI ELLIOT PRICE REGIONAL CONSERVATION ETADUNNA TALLARINGA PARK RESERVE CONSERVATION Mount Clarence HS PARK COOBER PEDY COMMONAGE William Creek BOLLARDS LAGOON Coober Pedy ANNA CREEK Dulkaninna HS MABEL CREEK DULKANINNA MOUNT CLARENCE Lindon HS Muloorina HS LINDON MULOORINA CLAYTON Curdimurka MURNPEOWIE INGOMAR FINNISS STUARTS CREEK SPRINGS MARREE ABORIGINAL Ingomar HS LAND CALLANNA Marree MUNDOWDNA LAKE CALLABONNA COMMONWEALTH HILL FOSSIL MCDOUAL RESERVE PEAK Mobella
    [Show full text]
  • Governing Uranium in Australia
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Vestergaard, Cindy Research Report Governing uranium in Australia DIIS Report, No. 2015:11 Provided in Cooperation with: Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS), Copenhagen Suggested Citation: Vestergaard, Cindy (2015) : Governing uranium in Australia, DIIS Report, No. 2015:11, ISBN 978-87-7605-762-6, Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS), Copenhagen This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/144725 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Environmental and Health Impacts of Uranium Mining
    Nuclear Development 2014 Managing Environmental and Health Impacts of Uranium Mining Managing Environmental Managing Environmental and Health Impacts of Uranium Mining NEA Nuclear Development Managing Environmental and Health Impacts of Uranium Mining © OECD 2014 NEA No. 7062 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 34 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Republic of Korea, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The European Commission takes part in the work of the OECD. OECD Publishing disseminates widely the results of the Organisation’s statistics gathering and research on economic, social and environmental issues, as well as the conventions, guidelines and standards agreed by its members. This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeking a Balance Conservation and Resource Use in the Northern Flinders Ranges
    Seeking a Balance Conservation and resource use in the Northern Flinders Ranges Government of South Australia Protecting the values of the Northern Flinders Ranges The Flinders Ranges has some of the most recognisable and loved landscapes in South Australia, with outstanding environmental, cultural, and tourism values. The Northern Flinders Ranges is also one of the most geologically diverse and prospective areas in Australia, with a long history of exploration and mining and potential mineral and energy resources of national and international significance. The concentration of all of these values in one region is unique. Making decisions requires care to ensure that there is a balance between conservation and resource use. The State’s Development Plan for the Flinders Ranges (Land not within a Council Area (Flinders)), established under the Development Act 1993, was last consolidated in 2003. Much of the Northern Flinders Ranges lies within the Development Plan’s Environmental Class A Zone. The prime objectives of the Environmental Class A Zone seek to conserve the natural character and environment of the area and to protect the landscape from damage by mining operations and exploring for new resources. Reflecting these objectives, Government already places strict conditions and regulatory controls on mineral and energy exploration and on proposed mining activities in the region. Given the unique values of the region, the South Australian Government recognises the need to further refine the existing management and regulatory framework for ongoing resource activities. In doing this, the key environmental values of the region will be protected, and there will also be greater certainty for exploration and mining companies, landowners, traditional owners and the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Pwgta Rgb Online V16-Colour-V31
    PHOTOWORDS GUIDE TO ARKAROOLA Northern Flinders Ranges Grant Da Costa 3 Contents Pronunciation of Names 32 Mistakes and Changes 32 Follow Photowords on Facebook 2 PART THREE: The Guide PART 1: Key Maps, Activity List and In this list, L = Location; W = Walk; D = Drive. Legend Map 1A Adelaide to Arkaroola 4 Chapter 1. From the Village Map 1B South Australia 4 01-W: Sitting Bull 33 Map 1C Arkaroola 4 02-W: The Pinnacles and Sitting Bull 35 Map 2 Key to Chapters Locations Drives Walks 5 03-W: Mawson – Spriggina Circuit 36 List of Locations, Drives and Walks 6 04-W: Acacia Ridge Trail 38 List of Maps 4 to 13…page 7 05-W: Griselda Hill 41 Legend for Maps 4 to 13…page 7 Chapter 2. The Echo Camp Road Map 3 - Key to Maps 4 to 13…page 8 06-L: Echo Camp 43 PART 2: Before You Go 07-D: Arkaroola Waterhole and Echo Camp 43 08-W: Arkaroola Waterhole Gorge 45 Arkaroola 09-W: Echo Camp Waterhole 46 The Essence of Arkaroola 9 10-W: American Gap 47 Geological Formation 10 11-W: Radium Creek and Coulthard Lookout 48 Climate 12 12-W: Mt Painter 49 Flora 13 Fauna 16 Chapter 3. The Umberatana Road Aboriginal Heritage 18 13-L: Bolla Bollana Copper Smelter 51 European Exploration and Settlement 20 14-D: Bolla Bollana and Nooldoonooldoona 52 Arkaroola Today 21 15-W: Bolla Bollana Waterholes and Gorge 55 16-W: Nooldoonooldoona W/hole & Surrounds 55 Trip Planning 17-L: Wheal Turner Copper Mine 57 Contact Details 23 18-D: Wheal Turner Copper Mine 58 When to Go 23 19-W: Wheal Turner Range 59 Getting There 23 20-W: Blue Mine Creek Lookout 60 by Road 24 21-D: Wheal Turner and North Well Loop 61 by Bus 24 by Hire Car 24 Chapter 4.
    [Show full text]