DOCSLIB.ORG

Illustrations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Illustrations Illustrations Figure 1.1 Treasure Island appears like a floating platform. Figure 1.2 The western edge of the low-lying Treasure Island in 2012. Figure 1.3 Treasure Island in the middle of San Francisco Bay, 1939. Figure 1.4 Master plan for Treasure Island Airport, 1941. Figure 1.5 “Tierra Nueva” under construction, 1936. Figure 1.6 Montage view of a design for the “Magic City,” 1935. Figure 1.7 Site plan of the Golden Gate International Exposition, 1939. Figure 1.8 Cinematically lit, eighty-foot statue Pacifica by Ralph Stackpole, 1939. Figure 1.9 A night shot of the Golden Gate International Exposition, 1939. Figure 1.10 Maps illustrating the GGIE as part of the Pacific Rim and road networks, 1939. Figure 1.11 “Native Means of Transportation,” 1939. Figure 1.12 Aerial photograph of Naval Station Treasure Island in the 1940s. Figure 1.13 Comparative illustration of the sizes of naval bases in 1985. Figure 1.14 Victory Day celebrations on Naval Station Treasure Island, 1945. Figure 1.15 Construction of embarkation facilities, 1944. Figure 1.16 Master plan showing Treasure Island, 1966. Figure 1.17 Master plan showing Yerba Buena Island, 1966. Figure 1.18 Overlapping sites, 1965. Figure 1.19 Magic City 2.0, 2005. Figure 1.20 Model of proposed development, 2005. Figure 1.21 Rendering from the Treasure Island–Yerba Buena Island Development Project, 2005. Figure 1.22 Map of Treasure Island showing “newly identified radiologically impacted areas,” 2012. Figure 2.1 Aerial drawing of Golden Gate International Exposition at Treasure Island, 1935. Figure 2.2 Berkeley landfill, 1987. Figure 2.3 San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge under construction, 1933–1936. Figure 2.4 Douglas Skyhawk, 2015. Figure 2.5 Bay Area housing starts, 2000–2010. Figure 2.6 Sea-level rise around San Francisco Bay, 2015. Figure 3.1 Cover of San Francisco Business, 1927. Figure 3.2 Map of proposed airport near China Basin, 1930. Figure 3.3 Proposed airport site, December 1932. Figure 3.4 Construction of perimeter wall and first building foundation, 1936. Figure 3.5 Boy on pipe discharging sand, 1936. Figure 3.6 Laying pipes on the emerging island, 1936–1937. Figure 3.7 Diagram of well-point drainage to leach sandy soil, 1938. Figure 3.8 Mature trees barged in to Treasure Island, 1938. Figure 3.9 Major public works in the Bay Area in the early twentieth century, 1937. Figure 4.1 Poble Espanyol at the 1929 Exposició internacional in Barcelona. Figure 4.2 Italian Pavilion at A Century of Progress Fair, Chicago, 1933. Figure 4.3 Poster of the 1934 Century of Progress Fair. Figure 4.4 Chinese Bendix Lama Temple, Chicago, 1933. VIII ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 4.5 Aerial view of the Golden Gate International Exposition, 1933. Figure 4.6 Statue Pacifica at the GGIE, 1939–1940. Figure 4.7 GGIE plan, January 1937. Figure 4.8 GGIE plan, May 1937. Figure 4.9 United States Pavilion building, 1939–1940. Figure 4.10 Pacific Area rendering by Arthur Brown Jr., 1937. Figure 4.11 Pacific House and Asian pavilions, 1939. Figure 4.12 Central and South American buildings, 1938. Figure 4.13 Brazil Pavilion at the GGIE, 1939. Figure 5.1 Southern elevation of the Japan Pavilion, 1939. Figure 5.2 Northern and western elevations of the Japan Pavilion, 1939. Figure 5.3 Japan Pavilion garden, 1939. Figure 5.4 “Ground Plan,” circa 1938. Figure 5.5 Travel Hall fountain and map, 1939. Figure 5.6 Travel Hall fountain and statues, 1939. Figure 5.7 Program cover for the 1940 Takarazuka Revue GGIE performance. Figure 5.8 Celebrating Japan Day, May 1, 1939. Figure 5.9 Japanese American Nisei women, 1939. Figure 5.10 Destruction of the Japan Pavilion, April 8, 1941. Figure 6.1 Segregated barracks, 1944. Figure 6.2 Loading ammunition onto a train car. Figure 6.3 Port Chicago court-martial, October 1944. Figure 7.1 Naval Station Treasure Island students learn techniques of radiological detection, 1968. Figure 7.2 Map of Yerba Buena and Treasure Island Naval Stations. Figure 7.3 “The Bikini Blowup,” 1946. Figure 7.4 “U.S.–Marshall Island Relations,” 1948. Figure 7.5 Mock A-Bomb in San Francisco Bay, 1959. Figure 8.1 Fenced-off area with radioactive contamination, 2014. Figure 8.2 Bay Area’s military landscape. Figure 8.3 Diagram showing Fort Mason, circa 1876. Figure 8.4 Plan for reuse of Concord Naval Weapons Station, 2008. Figure 8.5 Oak Knoll master plan, 2006. Figure 8.6 Hangar 1 at Moffett Field, 1933. Figure 8.7 Northwestern tip of the Presidio abuts the Golden Gate Bridge. Figure 8.8 Fort Baker showing the parade ground, circa 1925. Figure 9.1 Model of Treasure Island–Yerba Buena Island Development Project, 2005. Figure 9.2 Illustrative plan of Treasure Island–Yerba Buena Island Development Project, 2005. Figure 9.3 Naval Station Treasure Island reuse plan, 1996. Figure 9.4 Illustrative reuse plan, 1997. Figure 9.5 Illustrative plan, 2002 proposal for development. Figure 9.6 Changes to 2002 proposal for development, 2004. Figure 9.7 Revised proposal for development, 2004. Figure 9.8 TIDP promotional material, 2005. Figure 9.9 Former California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, 2009. Figure 10.1 Geotech plan, 1996. Figure 10.2 Geotech table, 1996. ILLUSTRATIONS IX Figure 10.3 Treasure Island land use plan, 2006. Figure 10.4 Yerba Buena Island land use plan, 2006. Figure 11.1 Stopping points on a (de)tour of Treasure Island. Figure 11.2 Path to the shoreline walk on Treasure Island, 2014. Figure 11.3 Looking southwest toward San Francisco, 2014. Figure 11.4 Former naval housing facing San Francisco Bay, 2014. Figure 11.5 Specter of parking. Figure 11.6 Specter of cash. Figure 11.7 Storing the self, 2014. Figure 11.8 D4D master plan, 2011. Figure 11.9 Un-eco-city. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Art-Lovers Guide to the Exposition
    An Art−Lovers guide to the Exposition Shelden Cheney An Art−Lovers guide to the Exposition Table of Contents An Art−Lovers guide to the Exposition..................................................................................................................1 Shelden Cheney..............................................................................................................................................1 Foreword........................................................................................................................................................2 The Architecture and Art as a Whole.............................................................................................................2 The Court of Abundance................................................................................................................................5 Court of the Universe.....................................................................................................................................9 Court of the Four Seasons............................................................................................................................14 The Court of Palms and the Court of Flowers.............................................................................................17 The Tower of Jewels, and the Fountain of Energy......................................................................................19 Palaces Facing the Avenue of Palms...........................................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-011315Fed
    National Register Nomination Case Report HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 21, 2015 Date: October 21, 2015 Case No.: 2015-011315FED Project Address: 800 Chestnut Street (San Francisco Art Institute) Zoning: RH-3 (Residential House, Three-Family) 40-X Height and Bulk District Block/Lot: 0049/001 Project Sponsor: Carol Roland-Nawi, Ph.D., State Historic Preservation Officer California Office of Historic Preservation 1725 23rd Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95816 Staff Contact: Shannon Ferguson – (415) 575-9074 [email protected] Reviewed By: Timothy Frye – (415) 575-6822 [email protected] Recommendation: Send resolution of findings recommending that, subject to revisions, OHP approve nomination of the subject property to the National Register BACKGROUND In its capacity as a Certified Local Government (CLG), the City and County of San Francisco is given the opportunity to comment on nominations to the National Register of Historic Places (National Register). Listing on the National Register of Historic Places provides recognition by the federal government of a building’s or district’s architectural and historical significance. The nomination materials for the individual listing of the San Francisco Art Institute at 800 Chestnut Street were prepared by Page & Turnbull. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 800 Chestnut Street, also known as the San Francisco Art Institute, is located in San Francisco’s Russian Hill neighborhood on the northwest corner of Chestnut and Jones streets. The property comprises two buildings: the 1926 Spanish Colonial Revival style original building designed by Bakewell & Brown (original building) and the 1969 Brutalist addition designed by Paffard Keatinge-Clay (addition). Constructed of board formed concrete with red tile roofs, the original building is composed of small interconnected multi-level volumes that step up from Chestnut Street to Jones Street and range from one to two stories and features a five-story campanile, Churrigueresque entranceway and courtyard with tiled fountain.
    [Show full text]
  • Coit Tower Brochure V4 16 9 032016.Indd
    SCULPTURE COIT TOWER PIONEER PARK Above the main entrance to the tower is a cast con- Coit Tower, a fluted, reinforced concrete column, rises The green summit of Telegraph Hill is called Pioneer crete, high-relief plaque of the phoenix with out- THE STORY OF 212 feet above Telegraph Hill and offers magnificent Park, so named for the group of public spirited cit- stretched wings, sculpted by Robert B. Howard. This views of the Bay Area from an observation gallery izens who bought the land and gave it to the city mythical bird, reborn in fire, is a symbol of San Francis- at its top. Its architect was Henry Howard, working in 1876. Because of its commanding views, the hill co, whose history is punctuated by many catastrophic COIT for the firm of Arthur Brown, Jr., which created San housed a signal station in 1849 to relay news of ships blazes. In the center of the parking plaza stands a 12’ TOWER bronze statue of Christopher Columbus by Vitorio Di Francisco’s City Hall and Opera House. Contrary entering the Bay to the business community along Colvertaldo. It was given to the city by its Italian com- to popular belief, it was never intended to resemble Montgomery Street, hence the name Telegraph Hill. munity in 1957. And Its Art a firehose nozzle. Howard’s simple, vertical design San Francisco’s contact with the world then was by Frescoes depicting“Life in California...1934.” was selected because it best created a monumental sea, and all arrivals were important events. In the SOCIAL REALISM AND statement within the small site and small budget of 1880s, the site briefly contained an observatory and A legacy of 25 Artists of Social Realism and their Assistants.
    [Show full text]
  • John Edward Walker
    654 He was listed by the New York Times in 1914 as one of the dozen “notable” artists of Carmel.4 That fall his work was included in the Exhibition of Carmel and Southern California Artists at the Rabjohn & Morcom Gallery in San Francisco.5 A year later the Carmel Pine Cone reported that his paintings were selling well in that city.6 During the summer of 1916 he advertised his studio “by appointment only” at the “Schlingman Cottage” on Casanova Street between Seventh and Eighth Avenues.7 He taught art to select students in Carmel, but there is no evidence that he was an instructor at the Arts and Crafts Club Summer School. In 1913 he contributed the painting Coast View to the Seventh Annual Exhibition of that Club.8 As a Carmel resident his canvas was allowed into the award competition for that year. For the Club’s Tenth Annual in 1916 he submitted four pieces: Glow at Evening, Oaks in Spring, Happy Valley and Sand Dune-Carmel. Of these Blanche Marie d’Harcourt, art critic for The Wasp of San Francisco, declared that he “interprets Nature in her most poetical moods.”9 That December she reported that this “modest young Englishman” was hard at work “painting many scenes up the Carmel Valley.”10 In May of 1917 Walker assembled fifteen of his “small and modest” Carmel seascapes for exhibition at the Kanst Gallery in Los Angeles.11 The art critic for the Los Angeles Times, Antony Anderson, found the painter to be “a trifle over-conscientious” in depicting detail, too wordy in his titles and lacking in California’s bright colors, but he praised his drawing skills and genuine emotion.12 In a similar assessment of his “oil sketches” that June at the Schussler Brothers Gallery of San Francisco Anna Cora Winchell, the art critic of the San Francisco Chronicle, observed that the British painter depicted:13 .
    [Show full text]
  • A New Age for Artists
    A NEW AGE FOR ARTISTS: THE BIRTH OF THE NEW DEAL ART MOVEMENT AND THE POLITICAL CONNOTATIONS OF THE COlT TOWER MURALS Timothy Rottenberg Prior to 1934, public art did not exist in the United States ofAmerica. Occasionally, paintings by individual artists would achieve success and break out of the art gallery and private commission sphere into the public eye, but visibility was not widespread. With the construction of Coit Tower in San Francisco, the creation of the Public Works of Art Project (PWAP) in ‘934, and the unemployment of artists due to the Great Depression, a unique synchronistic moment came about when the birth of public art in America was forged. For the first time in American history, the PWAP gave artists the opportunity to reflect local and national politics through their own political lens using a medium that was meant for mass consumption by the public.i In January of there was nothing exciting about the San Fran cisco skyline. The city’s two tallest buildings stood at a stout 435 feet, and lay inconspicuously in the valley of the financial district, dwarfed even by the seven natural hills of San Francisco that surrounded them. With the Golden Gate and Bay bridges only in the earliest stages of construction, San Francisco lacked architectural individuality. Appropriately, Lillie Hitchcock Coit, a wealthy and eccentric San Francisco resident, desired beautification for the city she so admired. Despite having been born in Maryland and living in France for a number of years, the allure of the I believe this thesis to be wholly original in the field of historical study on the Public Works Administration as it related to the field of public art in America.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CONCORD HISTORIAN Page 2
    THE CONCORD HISTORIA N “PRESERVING THE PAST TO PROTECT THE FUTURE ” A Quarterly Publication of the Concord Historical Society Concord, CA Volume 44, Issue No. 3 August 2015 THE SOLDIER’S MEMORIAL MONUMENT By Vivian Boyd How many times in your life have you passed the Monument? You know, the big white, concrete obelisk found on a corner in Pleasant Hill. Have you ever used it as a landmark when giving directions? Have you had occasion to witness a ceremony at its base? Do you remember driving on either side of it? It stands 45 feet high and weighs 150 tons. There is a circular staircase lead- ing to an observation platform at the top, but it has been closed for many years due to public safety concerns. The Monument was originally located at the junction of Victory Highway and the Pacific and Redwood Highway. In 1954 when a new highway was built the Monument was moved to the intersection of Boyd Road and Route 21 (later changed to Monument Blvd.). Years later it was moved to its current location, as roads were reconfigured and plans for the cur- rent alignment of Interstate 680 were under way. It was surveyed by the County in 1994 and restored with funds from Contra Costa County Supervisors, Vet- eran's fundraising, and the City of Pleasant Hill in 1998. On Memorial Day of that year it was also rededicated. When the Soldier's Memorial was dedicated on December 11, 1927 to com- mentate the soldiers of World War I (“The Great War”), it created quite a stir.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History Interview with Ruth Cravath, 1965 September 23
    Oral history interview with Ruth Cravath, 1965 September 23 Contact Information Reference Department Archives of American Art Smithsonian Institution Washington. D.C. 20560 www.aaa.si.edu/askus Transcript Interview MM: MARY MCCHESNEY RC: RUTH CRAVATH MM: This is Mary McChesney interviewing Ruth Cravath who lives at 893 Wisconsin Street in San Francisco, California. The date is September 23, 1965. I would like to ask you first, Ruth, where were you born? RC: I was born in Chicago. MM: What year was that? RC: I was born in Chicago in 1902. MM: Where did you receive your art training? RC: Well, the first part of my art training was in the Art Institute of Chicago. I attended summer school there one summer and then I went to the lower school. At that time, the school was divided into lower school and middle school and upper school. And during the next year my family moved to California and, after one year of college in Iowa, I came to the California School of Fine Arts in San Francisco. MM: What year was that? RC: It must have been 1921, I guess. MM: Was it called the California School of Fine Arts? RC: It was the California School of Fine Arts and it was where the Mark Hopkins Hotel is now. As you know, it was at one time called the Mark Hopkins Institute, because it had been the Mark Hopkins family estate and the Art School was one story in the basement of the building there, until 1927. I believe it was in '27 when they sold it to the hotel.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco, La Californie
    Expo San Francisco Visites scolaires DOSSIER PÉDAGOGIQUE SAN FRANCISCO, LA CALIFORNIE FOIRE INTERNATIONALE DE CLERMONT-COURNON Centre d’affaires du Zénith - Trident bâtiment E 46 rue de Sarliève - CS 70036 63808 Cournon d’Auvergne Cedex #ClermontmaFoire CALIFORNIA STATE – L’ÉTAT DE CALIFORNIE (CA) Langue officielle : Anglais (57.4%) La quête continue de la découverte des terres mène à la création de villages par les Espagnols Autre langues parlées : Espagnol (28.5%), (qui deviendront plus tard Los Angeles et San Chinois (2.8%) José). Cette colonisation marque le début du L’État de Californie est le plus populaire des génocide des populations indigènes présentes États-Unis. Sa capitale est Sacramento mais en Californie pour cause de violences, manque la ville qui attire le plus de touristes est Los de nourriture et expulsions de leurs territoires. Angeles. La baie de San Francisco est quant Vient en 1846 la « Bear Flag Revolution » (la à elle la 5e région urbaine la plus prisée du « Révolution du Drapeau Ours ») qui se bat pays. On surnomme cet État « The Golden contre les lois Mexicaines. Ce mouvement se State » dû à la ruée vers l’or ayant eu lieu au transformera vite en guerre mexicains-amé- milieu du 19e siècle. ricains jusqu’en 1848. Le drapeau de cette ré- Le climat y est très varié car l’État est très volution estampé des mots « California Repu- vaste. On y trouve un climat en général mé- blic » deviendra plus tard le drapeau officiel de diterranéen, plus tropical au nord, désertique l’État. vers l’intérieur du pays et neigeux dans les Suite au traité qui mit fin à la guerre en 1848, montagnes autours.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Aid for the Peter Stackpole Archive, Circa 1920-2000 AG 169
    Center for Creative Photography The University of Arizona 1030 N. Olive Rd. P.O. Box 210103 Tucson, AZ 85721 Phone: 520-621-6273 Fax: 520-621-9444 Email: [email protected] URL: http://creativephotography.org Finding aid for the Peter Stackpole archive, circa 1920-2000 AG 169 Finding aid updated by Tai Huesgen, 2019 AG 169: Peter Stackpole archive - page 2 Peter Stackpole archive, circa 1920-2000 AG 169 Creator Stackpole, Peter (1913-1997) Abstract Photographic materials and papers, circa 1920-2000, of Peter Stackpole (1913 - 1997), photographer. Includes photographic materials and a small amount of biographical materials, writings, exhibition materials, publications, and audiovisual materials. Quantity/ Extent 6 linear feet Language of Materials English Biographical Note Peter Stackpole was born on June 15, 1913 at St. Francis Hospital in San Francisco, California, to the noted sculptor, Ralph Stackpole, and his artist wife, Adele Barnes Stackpole. His early years were spent in the Bay area, but he attended the Ecole Alsacienne in Paris in 1923, when his parents were living in France. Stackpole’s parents were separated, and his mother made her residence in Oakland while his father lived in San Francisco after their return from France. Stackpole attended Oakland’s Technical High School and developed a keen interest in photography in 1929. His first camera was an Agfa Memo half-frame model, but he purchased a 35mm Leica Model A and began to take the candid photographs that were soon to make him famous. While he was working for the Oakland Post-Enquirer, an unpaid position, he was sent with the newspaper’s regular photographers to shoot the Max Baer fight.
    [Show full text]
  • George Washington High School Murals Murals Were the Most Plentiful Public Art Form Commissioned Under New Deal Visual Art Programs
    ~~P~o covNryoN ~u ~ '~ `~z SAN FRANCISCO ti ~ ~ a PLANNING DEPARTMENT O7b3s~.::.:.O~Sti 1650 Mission St. Suite 400 Historic Preservation San Francisco, Commission CA 94103-2479 Resolution No. 910 Reception: HEARING DATE OCTOBER 18, 2017 415.558.6378 Fax: Case No. 2016-013562DES 415.558.6409 Project: 600 32^d Avenue (George Washington High School) Planning Landmark Designation Initiation Information: Staff Contact: Shannon Ferguson (415)575-9074 415.558.6377 [email protected] Reviewed By: Tim Frye — (415)575-6822 [email protected]$ RESOLUTION TO INITIATE DESIGNATION OF 600 32ND AVENUE. (AKA GEORGE WASHINGTON HIGH SCHOOL), ASSESSOR'S BLOCK 1574, LOT 001, AS ARTICLE 10 LANDMARK. 1. WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission, at its regular meeting of August 17, 2016, added 600 32nd Avenue (aka George Washington High School), Assessor's Block 1574, Lot 001, to the Landmark Designation Work Program; and 2. WHEREAS, Historic Preservation Consultants Christopher VerPlanck and Donna Graves prepared the Landmark Designation Report for 600 32nd Avenue with a grant from the Historic Preservation Fund Committee, which was reviewed by Planning Department Staff Shannon Ferguson and Tim Frye, who meet the Secretary of Interior's Professional Qualification Standards, for accuracy and conformance with the purposes and standards of Article 10; and 3. WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission, at its regular meeting of October 18, 2017, reviewed Department staff's analysis of 600 32nd Avenue's historical significance pursuant to Article 10
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History Interview with Clay Spohn, 1976 January 9-February 5
    Oral history interview with Clay Spohn, 1976 January 9-February 5 Funding for the digital preservation of this interview was provided by a grant from the Save America's Treasures Program of the National Park Service. Contact Information Reference Department Archives of American Art Smithsonian Institution Washington. D.C. 20560 www.aaa.si.edu/askus Transcript Preface The following oral history transcript is the result of a tape-recorded interview with Clay Spohn on January 9 and February 5, 1976. The interview was conducted at Clay Spohn's studio in New York City by Paul Cummings for the Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution. Interview PAUL CUMMINGS: It is January 9, 1976 and it’s Paul Cummings talking to Clay Spohn in his studio in Grand Street. So you were born in San Francisco, right? CLAY SPOHN: That’s right. PAUL CUMMINGS: Had your family lived there a long time and did you grow up there? CLAY SPOHN: Just a moment - is it necessary to talk above this? PAUL CUMMINGS: No, no, that’s fine. CLAY SPOHN: Is that all right? PAUL CUMMINGS: Yes. CLAY SPOHN: Yes. Shall I tell you about it? PAUL CUMMINGS: Please do. CLAY SPOHN: My father was born in Pennsylvania near Philadelphia. His ancestors came about 1700 and settled there. PAUL CUMMINGS: Where were they from? CLAY SPOHN: From Germany. My mother was born in California but her grand father, let’s see, he came from Germany but we are a mixture of French and German. In the Revolutionary War he was an American colonel but he was of English descent.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History Interview with Helen and Margaret Bruton, 1964 December 4
    Oral history interview with Helen and Margaret Bruton, 1964 December 4 Contact Information Reference Department Archives of American Art Smithsonian Institution Washington. D.C. 20560 www.aaa.si.edu/askus Transcript Preface The following oral history transcript is the result of a tape-recorded interview with Helen Bruton and Margaret Bruton on December 4, 1964. The interview was conducted at the Bruton's home at 871 Cass Street, Monterey, California by Lewis Ferbrache for the Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution. Interview LF: Lewis Ferbrache HB: Helen Bruton MB: Margaret Bruton LF: Lewis Ferbrache interviewing Miss Margaret Bruton and Miss Helen Bruton at their home, 871 Cass Street, Monterey, California, December 4, 1964. Miss Margaret Bruton, I believe you told me that you were born in Brooklyn, New York. Could you then tell about your Alameda, California school training in art? MB: Well, I was born in Brooklyn, but I went to school in Alameda, California. All my schooling was in Alameda, except when I went to art school, that was in San Francisco, at what was then the Mark Hopkins. I was there for about a year and then I – LF: Mark Hopkins School of Design, now the San Francisco Art Institute? MB: Yes. I won a scholarship for the Art Students League in New York so I went there and was studying there for quite a while. I studied with Robert Henri at the Art Students League. LF: Do you remember what year this would be, just for the record? MB: Well, it was about 1917, I think, it was just before the war – LF: Who were your teachers at the Mark Hopkins School of Design? That would be interesting.
    [Show full text]