DOCSLIB.ORG

Construction/Plant Overweight (Maintain)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Construction/Plant Overweight (Maintain) Construction/Plant Overweight (Maintain) Global EPC market to expand on rising oil prices Energy sector capex to expand, driven by rising oil prices Energy producers likely to focus on business diversification through downstream Issue Comment spending, rather than on production competition January 17, 2018 Global downstream capex growth positive to Korean firms’ overseas order recovery Mirae Asset Daewoo Co., Steady rise in oil prices to improve oil producers’ fiscal balances Ltd. [Construction/Construction Oil prices are steadily moving higher, with Brent crude recently breaking above US$70/bbl— Materials ] the highest level in three years. The rebound has been primarily driven by: 1) ongoing OPEC Kwangsoo Lee production cuts; 2) political instability in the Middle East; and 3) improving demand. The rise +822 -3774 -1457 in oil prices is likely to improve oil-producing nations’ fiscal balances. On average, OPEC [email protected] countries require an oil price of US$94/bbl to maintain a balanced budget (as of 2016). Global energy capex to grow History shows oil prices are positively correlated to capex in the energy sector. After reaching US$1tr in 2013, global energy capex steadily declined through 2016 due to falling oil prices. In 2017, however, global energy capex resumed growth following a rebound in oil prices, expanding 12% YoY to US$630bn. The increase in capex driven by rising oil prices is anticipated to continue in 2018. Reflecting such expectations, global EPC stocks have returned 13% on average over the past month. Changing dynamics to drive increase in downstream capex The intense battle in the energy sector was triggered by US shale gas and oil producers. In order to gain market share, these unconventional oil and gas producers aggressively ramped up production, causing a rapid decline in oil prices. While this eventually took a heavy toll on shale companies, with some going into bankruptcy, it also forced traditional oil producers to scale back production, which, in turn, set off a rebound in oil prices. Neither traditional oil producers nor shale companies are likely to aggressively expand upstream investments in response to the oil recovery, as both sides have learned from recent experience that managing output is mutually beneficial. We believe the focus will be on maintaining price stability by keeping production under control. As such, we think energy investments will be concentrated in the downstream space for business diversification rather than the upstream space. Global downstream capex expansion to support Korean firms’ overseas order recovery We expect global downstream capex expansion to contribute to an overseas order recovery at Korean EPC firms, especially considering their experience and competitive position in the global EPC market. We maintain our positive view on domestic EPC firms based on our expectation of an overseas order recovery. The top 15 global EPC firms recorded an average operating profit of W642bn in 2012 prior to the oil collapse, three times the 2016 figure (W194bn). This suggests earnings could rapidly recover once EPC investments gather steam. January 17, 2018 Construction/Plant Figure 1. Fiscal break-even oil price (2016) (US$/bbl) 140 · OPEC, oil producers: fiscal break-even oil price · Non-traditional energy: production costs 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Iran Libya Oman OPEC avg. New oil Qatar Saudi Deepwater UAE Iraq Eagle Ford Bakken Existing oil Kuwait sands Arabia sands Source: IMF, OPEC, Mirae Asset Daewoo Research Figure 2. Energy sector capex vs. oil price trend (US$/bbl) (US$bn) 120 Capex (R) Dubai crude (L) 1,200 100 1,000 80 800 60 600 40 400 20 200 0 0 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18F Source: EIA, Mirae Asset Daewoo Research Figure 3. Average operating profit of top 15 global EPC firms and oil prices (US$bn) (US$/bbl) 700 OP (L) Dubai crude (R) 120 600 100 500 80 400 60 300 40 200 100 20 0 0 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Note: Top 15 global EPC firms are Samsung Engineering, Hyundai E&C, GS E&C, Daelim Industrial, Daewoo E&C, Fluor, JGC, Chiyoda, Toyo Engineering, Tecnimont, TechnipFMC, Saipem, Tecnicas Reunidas, Petrofac, and Larsen & Toubro. Source: OPEC, Bloomberg, WISEfn, Mirae Asset Daewoo Research Mirae Asset Daewoo Research 2 January 17, 2018 Construction/Plant APPENDIX 1 Analyst Certification The research analysts who prepared this report (the “Analysts”) are registered with the Korea Financial Investment Association and are subject to Korean securities regulations. They are neither registered as research analysts in any other jurisdiction nor subject to the laws or regulations thereof. Each Analyst responsible for the preparation of this report certifies that (i) all views expressed in this report accurately reflect the personal views of the Analyst about any and all of the issuers and securities named in this report and (ii) no part of the compensation of the Analyst was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views contained in this report. Mirae Asset Daewoo Co., Ltd. (“Mirae Asset Daewoo”) policy prohibits its Analysts and members of their households from owning securities of any company in the Analyst’s area of coverage, and the Analysts do not serve as an officer, director or advisory board member of the subject companies. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Analysts have not received any compensation or any other benefits from the subject companies in the past 12 months and have not been promised the same in connection with this report. Like all employees of Mirae Asset Daewoo, the Analysts receive compensation that is determined by overall firm profitability, which includes revenues from, among other business units, the institutional equities, investment banking, proprietary trading and private client division. At the time of publication of this report, the Analysts do not know or have reason to know of any actual, material conflict of interest of the Analyst or Mirae Asset Daewoo except as otherwise stated herein. Disclaimers This report was prepared by Mirae Asset Daewoo, a broker-dealer registered in the Republic of Korea and a member of the Korea Exchange. Information and opinions contained herein have been compiled in good faith and from sources believed to be reliable, but such information has not been independently verified and Mirae Asset Daewoo makes no guarantee, representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information and opinions contained herein or of any translation into English from the Korean language. In case of an English translation of a report prepared in the Korean language, the original Korean language report may have been made available to investors in advance of this report. The intended recipients of this report are sophisticated institutional investors who have substantial knowledge of the local business environment, its common practices, laws and accounting principles and no person whose receipt or use of this report would violate any laws or regulations or subject Mirae Asset Daewoo or any of its affiliates to registration or licensing requirements in any jurisdiction shall receive or make any use hereof. This report is for general information purposes only and it is not and shall not be construed as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to effect transactions in any securities or other financial instruments. The report does not constitute investment advice to any person and such person shall not be treated as a client of Mirae Asset Daewoo by virtue of receiving this report. This report does not take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situations, or needs of individual clients. The report is not to be relied upon in substitution for the exercise of independent judgment. Information and opinions contained herein are as of the date hereof and are subject to change without notice. The price and value of the investments referred to in this report and the income from them may depreciate or appreciate, and investors may incur losses on investments. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. Future returns are not guaranteed, and a loss of original capital may occur. Mirae Asset Daewoo, its affiliates and their directors, officers, employees and agents do not accept any liability for any loss arising out of the use hereof. Mirae Asset Daewoo may have issued other reports that are inconsistent with, and reach different conclusions from, the opinions presented in this report. The reports may reflect different assumptions, views and analytical methods of the analysts who prepared them. Mirae Asset Daewoo may make investment decisions that are inconsistent with the opinions and views expressed in this research report. Mirae Asset Daewoo, its affiliates and their directors, officers, employees and agents may have long or short positions in any of the subject securities at any time and may make a purchase or sale, or offer to make a purchase or sale, of any such securities or other financial instruments from time to time in the open market or otherwise, in each case either as principals or agents. Mirae Asset Daewoo and its affiliates may have had, or may be expecting to enter into, business relationships with the subject companies to provide investment banking, market-making or other financial services as are permitted under applicable laws and regulations. No part of this document may be copied or reproduced in any manner or form or redistributed or published, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of Mirae Asset Daewoo. Distribution United Kingdom: This report is being distributed by Mirae Asset Securities (UK) Ltd. in the United Kingdom only to (i) investment professionals falling within Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the “Order”), and (ii) high net worth companies and other persons to whom it may lawfully be communicated, falling within Article 49(2)(A) to (E) of the Order (all such persons together being referred to as “Relevant Persons”).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Middle East Oil Pricing Systems in Flux Introduction
    May 2021: ISSUE 128 MIDDLE EAST OIL PRICING SYSTEMS IN FLUX INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 THE GULF/ASIA BENCHMARKS: SETTING THE SCENE...................................................................................................... 5 Adi Imsirovic THE SHIFT IN CRUDE AND PRODUCT FLOWS ..................................................................................................................... 8 Reid l'Anson and Kevin Wright THE DUBAI BENCHMARK: EVOLUTION AND RESILIENCE ............................................................................................... 12 Dave Ernsberger MIDDLE EAST AND ASIA OIL PRICING—BENCHMARKS AND TRADING OPPORTUNITIES......................................... 15 Paul Young THE PROSPECTS OF MURBAN AS A BENCHMARK .......................................................................................................... 18 Michael Wittner IFAD: A LURCHING START IN A SANDY ROAD .................................................................................................................. 22 Jorge Montepeque THE SECOND SPLIT: BASRAH MEDIUM AND THE CHALLENGE OF IRAQI CRUDE QUALITY...................................... 29 Ahmed Mehdi CHINA’S SHANGHAI INE CRUDE FUTURES: HAPPY ACCIDENT VERSUS OVERDESIGN ............................................. 33 Tom Reed FUJAIRAH’S RISE TO PROMINENCE ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ice Crude Oil
    ICE CRUDE OIL Intercontinental Exchange® (ICE®) became a center for global petroleum risk management and trading with its acquisition of the International Petroleum Exchange® (IPE®) in June 2001, which is today known as ICE Futures Europe®. IPE was established in 1980 in response to the immense volatility that resulted from the oil price shocks of the 1970s. As IPE’s short-term physical markets evolved and the need to hedge emerged, the exchange offered its first contract, Gas Oil futures. In June 1988, the exchange successfully launched the Brent Crude futures contract. Today, ICE’s FSA-regulated energy futures exchange conducts nearly half the world’s trade in crude oil futures. Along with the benchmark Brent crude oil, West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil and gasoil futures contracts, ICE Futures Europe also offers a full range of futures and options contracts on emissions, U.K. natural gas, U.K power and coal. THE BRENT CRUDE MARKET Brent has served as a leading global benchmark for Atlantic Oseberg-Ekofisk family of North Sea crude oils, each of which Basin crude oils in general, and low-sulfur (“sweet”) crude has a separate delivery point. Many of the crude oils traded oils in particular, since the commercialization of the U.K. and as a basis to Brent actually are traded as a basis to Dated Norwegian sectors of the North Sea in the 1970s. These crude Brent, a cargo loading within the next 10-21 days (23 days on oils include most grades produced from Nigeria and Angola, a Friday). In a circular turn, the active cash swap market for as well as U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Structure, Inventories and Oil Prices: an Empirical Analysis
    Market Structure, Inventories and Oil Prices: An Empirical Analysis Jennifer I. Considine and Philipp Galkin and Abdullah Aldayel January 2020 Doi: 10.30573/KS--2020-DP02 Market Structure, Inventories and Oil Prices: An Empirical Analysis 1 About KAPSARC The King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center (KAPSARC) is a non-profit global institution dedicated to independent research into energy economics, policy, technology and the environment across all types of energy. KAPSARC’s mandate is to advance the understanding of energy challenges and opportunities facing the world today and tomorrow, through unbiased, independent, and high-caliber research for the benefit of society. KAPSARC is located in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. This publication is also available in Arabic. Legal Notice © Copyright 2020 King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center (“KAPSARC”). This Document (and any information, data or materials contained therein) (the “Document”) shall not be used without the proper attribution to KAPSARC. The Document shall not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without the written permission of KAPSARC. KAPSARC makes no warranty, representation or undertaking whether expressed or implied, nor does it assume any legal liability, whether direct or indirect, or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information that is contained in the Document. Nothing in the Document constitutes or shall be implied to constitute advice, recommendation or option. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views or position of KAPSARC. Market Structure, Inventories and Oil Prices: An Empirical Analysis 2 Market Structure, Inventories and Oil Prices: An Empirical Analysis Key PointsJennifer I.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Low Oil Price on Energy Security Impact of Low Oil Price on Energy Security
    APEC Oil and Gas Security Studies Series 10 APEC Oil and Gas Security Studies Impact of Low Oil Price on Energy Security Impact of Low Oil Price on Energy Security Energy Working Group EWG 01 2016S PRODUCED BY: Series Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC) Institute of Energy Economics, Japan 10 June 2017 Inui Building, Kachidoki 11F, 1-13-1 Kachidoki Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0054 Japan Tel: (813) 5144-8551 Fax: (813) 5144-8555 E-mail: [email protected] (administration) Website: http://aperc.ieej.or.jp/ FOR: Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat 35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119616 Tel: (65) 68 919 600 Fax: (65) 68 919 690 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.apec.org © 2017 APEC Secretariat APEC#217-RE-01.7. ISBN 978-981-11-3850-8 2017 Photographs credited by APERC Impact of Low Oil Price on Energy Security APEC Oil and Gas Security Studies Series 10 Energy Working Group June 2017 EWG 01 2016S PRODUCED BY: Dr Ken Koyama, Mr Ichiro Kutani, Mr Takashi Matsumoto, Mr Tadashi Yoshida Asia-Pacific Energy Research Centre (APERC) Institute of Energy Economics, Japan Inui Building, Kachidoki 11F, 1-13-1 Kachidoki Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0054 Japan Tel: (813) 5144-8551 Fax: (813) 5144-8555 E-mail: [email protected] (administration) Website: http://aperc.ieej.or.jp/ PRODUCED FOR: Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Secretariat 35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace, Singapore 119616 Tel: (65) 68 919 600 Fax: (65) 68 919 690 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://www.apec.org This research document is available at: http://aperc.ieej.or.jp © 2017 APEC Secretariat APEC#217-RE-01.7 ISBN 978-981-11-3850-8 Photographs credited by APERC ii Foreword During the 11th APEC Energy Ministers’ Meeting (EMM11) held in Beijing, China on 2nd September 2014, the Ministers issued instructions to the Energy Working Group (EWG).
    [Show full text]
  • Petroleum Argus Energy, Investment and Politics
    Petroleum Argus Energy, investment and politics Volume XLVIII, 4, 26 January 2018 Fractured world EDITORIAL: China and the US’ US president Donald Trump has decided to impose tariffs on imported solar diverging energy pathways make panels, highlighting the divergent energy pathways envisaged by the world’s investment decisions more dif- largest energy users. China plans to become a global leader in renewable energy ficult for oil and gas producers technology at home and abroad, as it reduces its dependence on domestic coal. But the US aims to become a net energy exporter, as it exploits its shale reserves to reinforce its position as the world’s biggest oil and natural gas producer. Investment in renewable energy could soon rival upstream spending on oil and gas. Global clean energy investment — mainly solar and wind power — reached $334bn last year, consultancy Bloomberg New Energy Finance says. This was around three-quarters of the amount spent on upstream oil and gas, after the oil price slump in 2014-16 spurred an unprecedented decline in investment. China’s investment in clean energy is now at parity with US upstream oil and gas spending. China leads the world in clean energy investment, spending $133bn, or 40pc of the global total, in 2017. A surge in solar power investment accounted for two-thirds of the country’s clean energy total last year. US upstream spending tumbled by 40pc to just $81bn in 2015-16, the IEA says. Higher oil prices are spurring a second year of revived US upstream investment, but China’s ambitious spending plans for clean energy are expected to keep pace.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology and Specifications Guide Crude Oil Latest Update: January 2019
    Methodology and specifications guide Crude oil Latest update: January 2019 Introduction 2 Part V: Corrections 12 How this methodology statement is organized 2 Part VI: Requests for clarifications of data and Part I: Input data 2 complaints 12 Reporting data to Platts 3 What to report 3 Part VII: Definitions of the trading locations for which How to report 3 Platts publishes daily indexes or assessments 13 MOC data publishing principles 3 North Sea 16 West Africa 23 Part II: Security and confidentiality 7 Urals and Mediterranean 27 Persian Gulf 35 Part III: Determining assessments 8 Asia Pacific 42 MOC price assessment principles 8 United States 52 Normalization price adjustment techniques 8 Canada 57 Prioritizing data 9 Latin America 59 Assessment Calculations 9 Futures Assessments 62 Part IV: Platts editorial standards 12 Revision History 64 www.spglobal.com/platts Methodology and specifications guide Crude oil: January 2019 INTRODUCTION market acceptance for any proposed introduction or changes to where one or more reporting entities submit market data methodology. For more information on the review and approval that constitute a significant proportion of the total data upon Platts methodologies are designed to produce price procedures, please visit: https://www.spglobal.com/platts/en/ which the assessment is based. assessments that are representative of market value, and of the our-methodology/methodology-review-change particular markets to which they relate. Methodology documents ■■ Part IV explains the process for verifying that published prices describe the specifications for various products reflected All Platts methodologies reflect Platts commitment to comply with Platts standards. by Platts assessments, the processes and standards Platts maintaining best practices in price reporting.
    [Show full text]
  • OPEC Chief Says Oil Market Responding Well to Record OPEC+
    May 21, 2020 OPEC chief says oil market responding well to "Chinese refiners have lost lots of money on refined oil record OPEC+ cut exports as demand in overseas markets was hit badly by the coronavirus," said Ding Xu of China-based Sublime OPEC is encouraged by a rally in oil prices and strong Info, adding that they would rather focus on the home adherence to its latest output cut, its secretary general market. said, although sources say the group has not ruled For the past two months, a complex refinery was losing out further steps to support the market. money producing gasoline as demand crashed following The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting lockdowns to curb the spread of the coronavirus. Countries, Russia and other allies, a group known as China's retail fuel prices are protected by a minimum Brent OPEC+, are cutting supply by a record 9.7 million crude price of $40 a barrel, however, and home demand barrels per day (bpd) from May 1 to offset a slump in has recovered swiftly, denting exports, said Kostantsa prices and demand caused by the coronavirus Rangelova of JBC Energy. outbreak. Expectations of lower Chinese petrol exports and optimism Oil prices have more than doubled since hitting a 21- over global demand recovery flipped Asia's refining margin year low below $16 in April. So far in May, OPEC+ to a small premium of 4 cents to Brent crude on Tuesday has cut oil exports by about 6 million bpd, according for the first time in about two months.
    [Show full text]
  • Murban: a Benchmark for the Middle East?
    October 2019 Murban: A benchmark for the Middle East? OXFORD ENERGY COMMENT Ahmed Mehdi, Eesha Muneeb, Adi Imsirovic, Bassam Fattouh 1. Introduction The Gulf producers are the world’s largest crude oil exporters, with most of their crude – sold via long- term contracts – flowing eastward. But oil market dynamics are shifting, reinforcing certain existing trends and creating new ones: East of Suez crude balances over the next decade highlight Asia’s growing crude import requirement; light crude exports (particularly US grades) to Asia keep increasing (see Figure 1); crude slates are getting lighter, reflecting the shift in product demand patterns, especially due to the International Maritime Organization 2020 low-sulphur bunker fuel requirements; and Asian trading participants are becoming more active ‘price makers’ rather than ‘price takers’.1 Figure 1: US crude flows to Asia, kb/d 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Korea India Vietnam Thailand Indonesia Japan China Taiwan Note: kb/d = thousand barrels per day. Source: US EIA. As the region’s cushioned position unravels in the face of rising oil production from other corners of the world, Gulf national oil companies (NOCs) face a fresh challenge: how to remain competitive in their largest and most profitable market. The response and strategies necessary to confront these challenges are more layered than simply keeping prices low. As Asia’s refiners buy increasing volumes of crude oil from previously inaccessible origins, they are also exposed to dynamic pricing and hedging options. The crude oil pricing system is key to these dynamics. Historically, the region’s Asia-bound sales have been priced against two sour markers: Platts Dubai and Oman.
    [Show full text]
  • Light and Heavy Naphtha: International Market Analysis
    Light and Heavy Naphtha: International Market Analysis Prospectus Energy & Chemical | Light and Heavy Naphtha: International Market Analysis Contents The Market ................................................................................2 Objective ...................................................................................3 Key Questions ..........................................................................4 Scope of work ..........................................................................5 Deliverables .............................................................................6 Methodology ......................................................................... 7-8 Table of Contents ................................................................9-11 Expert Team ............................................................................12 Qualifications .........................................................................13 About Chemical at IHS Makit ..............................................14 About Energy at IHS Makit ...................................................15 About IHS Markit ....................................................................16 This prospectus is for the recipient’s internal use only. No part can be copied, distributed, or republished. © 2017 IHS Markit 2 Energy & Chemical | Light and Heavy Naphtha: International Market Analysis The Market Oversupply of North American unconventional crude oil and natural gas has increased exports of most hydrocarbons and has profoundly
    [Show full text]
  • The World Oil Market and US Policy
    The World Oil Market and U.S. Policy: Background and Select Issues for Congress Updated April 23, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45493 SUMMARY R45493 The World Oil Market and U.S. Policy: April 23, 2019 Background and Select Issues for Congress Heather L. Greenley The United States, as the largest consumer and producer of oil, plays a major role in the world Analyst in Energy Policy market. Policy decisions can affect the price of oil and petroleum products (e.g., gasoline) for U.S. consumers and companies operating in U.S. oil production, transportation, and refining sectors. Congress considers policies that can affect the world oil market, including trade, sanctions, protection of trade routes, the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), and alternative fuel standards. Technological advancements, supportive policies, and other aspects of the U.S. oil industry have reversed a multidecade downward trend in U.S. oil production. In 2018, U.S. oil production nearly doubled compared to 2008. The United States is also the number one consumer of crude oil and refined petroleum products in the world. The pricing of crude oil contributes to the price consumers pay for petroleum products in the United States. Congress has maintained an interest in oil policy. Following the 1973 Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC) oil embargo, Congress passed the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975 (EPCA; P.L. 94-163). In response to rapid price escalation and perceived scarcity, the EPCA, among many other things, restricted U.S. produced crude oil exports. As the oil sector evolved, Congress has amended the EPCA.
    [Show full text]
  • January 2020 OPEC Monthly Oil Market Report
    OPEC Monthly Oil Market Report 15 January 2020 Feature article: Monetary policies: Potential impact on the oil market Oil market highlights i Feature article iii Crude oil price movements 1 Commodity markets 9 World economy 12 World oil demand 31 World oil supply 41 Product markets and refinery operations 60 Tanker market 66 Oil trade 70 Stock movements 77 Balance of supply and demand 84 Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries Helferstorferstrasse 17, A-1010 Vienna, Austria E-mail: prid(at)opec.org Website: www.opec.org Disclaimer The data, analysis and any other information (the “information”) contained in the Monthly Oil Market Report the “MOMR”) is for informational purposes only and is neither intended as a substitute for advice from busi- ness, finance, investment consultant or other professional; nor is it meant to be a benchmark or input data to a benchmark of any kind. Whilst reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in the MOMR, the OPEC Secretariat makes no warranties or representations as to its accuracy, rel- evance or comprehensiveness, and assumes no liability or responsibility for any inaccuracy, error or omission, or for any loss or damage arising in connection with or attributable to any action or decision taken as a result of using or relying on the information in the MOMR. The views expressed in the MOMR are those of the OPEC Secretariat and do not necessarily reflect the views of its governing bodies or Member Countries. The desig- nation of geographical entities in the MOMR, and the use and presentation of data and other materials, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of OPEC and/or its Member Countries concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the exploration, exploitation, refining, marketing and utilization of its petroleum or other energy resources.
    [Show full text]
  • An Anatomy of the Crude Oil Pricing System
    An Anatomy of the Crude Oil Pricing System Bassam Fattouh1 WPM 40 January 2011 1 Bassam Fattouh is the Director of the Oil and Middle East Programme at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies; Research Fellow at St Antony‟s College, Oxford University; and Professor of Finance and Management at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. I would like to express my gratitude to Argus for supplying me with much of the data that underlie this research. I would also like to thank Platts for providing me with the data for Figure 21 and CME Group for providing me with the data for Figure 13. The paper has benefited greatly from the helpful comments of Robert Mabro and Christopher Allsopp and many commentators who preferred to remain anonymous but whose comments provided a major source of information for this study. The paper also benefited from the comments received in seminars at the Department of Energy and Climate Change, UK, ENI, Milan and Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Oxford. Finally, I would like to thank those individuals who have given their time for face-to-face and/or phone interviews and have been willing to share their views and expertise. Any remaining errors are my own. 1 The contents of this paper are the authors’ sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2011 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made.
    [Show full text]