Curriculum Vitae

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Curriculum Vitae CURRICULUM VITAE Alberto Cambrosio, Ph.D. January 2019 Date of birth: December 8, 1950 Place of birth: Lugano (Switzerland) Citizenship: Swiss and Canadian Languages: French, English, Italian (write and speak) German, Spanish (read) Address (Work): Department of Social Studies of Medicine McGill University 3647 Peel Street Montreal, Quebec H3A 1X1 Tel.: ++1-514 398-4981 Fax: ++1-514 398-1498 E-Mail: alberto.cambrosio@mcgill.ca Web: https://mcgill.ca/ssom/staff/alberto-cambrosio Education 1977-1984: Philosophiae Doctor - “Histoire et Sociopolitique des Sciences” (History and Sociology of Science), University of Montreal (Quebec, Canada) [12 January 1984] 1975-1977: Maîtrise en Environnement (Master’s Degree in Environmental Sciences), Faculty of Science, University of Sherbrooke (Quebec, Canada) [22 October 1977] 1969-1974: Diplom (B.Sc. Honours) - Zoology (Biology), Faculty of Science, University of Basel (Switzerland) [10 December 1973] Alberto Cambrosio, Curriculum Vitae – page 2 Fields of specialization Sociology of science, technology and medicine Sociology of biomedical knowledge and practices Sociology of innovation History of contemporary biomedicine Social assessment of science and technology Academic and professional experience PRESENT POSITION Since 1990: Department of Social Studies of Medicine (also: Associate Member, Department of Sociology), McGill University (Montreal): • 2004 (June) – present: Full Professor • 1994 (June) – 2004: Associate Professor (with tenure) • 1990 - 1994: Associate Professor (tenure track) PREVIOUS AND TEMPORARY POSITIONS • 2005-2016: Chair, Department of Social Studies of Medicine, McGill University. • 2018-2019: Invited Professor, Centre de Sociologie des Organisations, Sciences Po, Paris. • 2016 (June): Invited Researcher, Making Genomic Medicine project, Science, Technology and Innovation Studies Subject Group, University of Edinburgh (UK). • 2009-2015: “Mentor”, The Health Care, Technology, and Place II (HCTP2) CIHR Strategic Research and Training Program. • 2011-2012: Invited Researcher, Centre de Sociologie des Organisations, Sciences Po, Paris. • 2009 (June-July): Invited Researcher, UMR 912 Inserm-IRD-Université de la Méditerranée (SE4S: “Sciences Economiques et Sociales, Systèmes de Santé, Sociétés”), Marseille (France). • 2008 (May-June): Invited Researcher, UMR 912 Inserm-IRD-Université de la Méditerranée (SE4S: “Sciences Économiques et Sociales, Systèmes de Santé, Sociétés”), Marseille (France). • 2007-2008: “Mentor”, The Health Care, Technology, and Place (HCTP) CIHR Strategic Research and Training Program. • 1991-2008: Regular member, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST), Montreal. • 2007 (May-June): Invited Professor (“Professeur associé de 1ère classe”), École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris, Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation. • 2005 (April): Visiting Fellow, ESRC Centre for Social and Economic Aspects of Genomics (CESAGen), Cardiff School of Social Sciences, University of Cardiff (UK). Alberto Cambrosio, Curriculum Vitae – page 3 • 2004-2005 (September-May): Senior Invited Researcher, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Unit 502: Centre de Recherche Médecine, Sciences, Santé et Société (CERMES), Villejuif (Paris, France). • 2002 (January–August): Acting Chair, Department of Social Studies of Medicine, McGill University. • 2001 (January-December): Senior Invited Researcher (“Poste orange”), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Unit 379: Épidémiologie et sciences sociales appliquées à l’innovation médicale, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseilles (France). • 1999 (October-November): Invited Visiting Scholar, Max-Planck Institute for the History of Science, Berlin, Germany. • 1999 (March-June): Invited Research Fellow, Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, History of Modern Biomedical Science Unit, London (U.K.) • 1997 (February-March): Invited Professor, Faculté de Lettres et Philosophie, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon (France). • 1996-1997: Invited researcher, Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation, École Nationale Supérieure des Mines, Paris, and INSERM Unité 158 “Savoirs et pratiques dans le champ médical: histoire, sociologie, psychanalyse”, Hôpital des Enfants Malades, Paris. • 1986-1990: “Professeur sous octroi” (Research Professor), Centre de recherche en évaluation sociale des technologies (CREST), and Department of Sociology, Université du Québec à Montréal. • 1990 (July-September): “Maître de recherche associé” (Research Associate), Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation, École Nationale Supérieure des Mines, Paris. • 1985-1986: Visiting Scholar (Postdoctoral Fellow), Program in Science, Technology, and Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. • 1984-1985: Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Sociology, Université de Montréal. • 1984: Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Sociology, Université du Québec à Montréal. • 1983-1984: Consulting Professor, Télé-Université (Université du Québec). • 1983: Research Assistant, Institut Québécois de Recherches sur la Culture. • 1980-1983: Lecturer, Department of Biological Sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal. • 1978-1980: Teaching Assistant, École Polytechnique de Montréal. • 1978: Research Assistant, Institut d’Histoire et de Sociopolitique des Sciences, Université de Montréal. Honors and awards • 2011-2012: Senior Fellow of the “Research in Paris” program, City of Paris. • 2009-2010: Gordon Cain Fellow in Technology, Policy, and Entrepreneurship, Chemical Heritage Foundation, Philadelphia. • 2005: Ludwik Fleck Prize by the Society for Social Studies of Science (4S) for the book Biomedical Platforms, co-authored with Peter Keating. The Prize is awarded annually for the best book in the area of science and technology studies. • 1997: Burroughs Wellcome Fund, 40th Anniversary Award in the History of Medicine. • 2011-present: Member of the International Editorial Advisory Board of the Genetics & Society Book Series published by Routledge. Alberto Cambrosio, Curriculum Vitae – page 4 • 2009-2016: Member of the Advisory Board of Medicine Studies. • 2007-present: Member of the Scientific Board of Politix: Revue de sciences sociales du politique. • 2018-present: Member of the Advisory Board of History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. • 2007-present: Member of the Scientific Board of Rivista per le Medical Humanities. • 2005-present: Member of the Editorial Advisory Board of Social Studies of Science. • 1998-present: Member of the International Editorial Advisory Board of New Genetics & Society. • 2007-2018: Member of the Editorial Board of History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences. • 1997-2000: Member of the Advisory Editorial Board of Social Problems. • 2018-2019: Invited Professor, Centre de Sociologie des Organisations, Sciences Po, Paris • 2011-2012: Invited Researcher, Centre de Sociologie des Organisations, Sciences Po, Paris. • 2007 (May-June): Invited Professor (“Professeur associé de 1ère classe”), École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris, Centre de Sociologie de l’Innovation • 2004-2005: Senior Invited Researcher (“Poste rouge”), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), France. • 2001: Senior Invited Researcher (“Poste orange”), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), France. • 1985-1986: Postdoctoral Fellowship of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. • 1984-1985: Postdoctoral Fellowship of the Fondation du Prêt d’Honneur (Quebec). • 1984: Postdoctoral Fellowship of the “Fondation de l’Université du Québec à Montréal. Research grants and contracts [when not otherwise specified, $ = Canadian $]] • 2016-2019 – [Collaborator] Network of Centres of Excellence, BioCanRx Clinical, Social and Economic Impact Program: “Towards Rational Design of Policies and Practices to Enable Clinical Translation of Novel Cancer Biotherapeutics in Canada” (with Tania Bubela, PI, Co-PIs: Christopher McCabe, Jean Sébastien Delisle; Collaborators: Harold Atkins, Jonathan Kimmelman, Richard Gold, Robert Holt, Katherine Bonter, Sowmya Viswanathan, Robert Cook-Degan, David Evans, Katerina Maxikova) – $346,390. • 2015-2019 – [PI] Canadian Institutes of Health Research Grant (MOP-142478): “Oncology's metaknowledge networks: an investigation of the collective dynamics of bio- clinical innovation” (with James Allen Evans, Jean-Philippe Cointet, Peter Keating and Pascale Bourret) – $640,576. • 2015-2016 – [co-PI] Portuguese Association for Cancer Research and Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian: “CancerRePort / RePortCancer: Researching the dynamics and international positioning of the Portuguese medical oncology community” (with Leonor David, PI, and João Arriscado Nunes and Jean-Philippe Cointet, co-PIs). Alberto Cambrosio, Curriculum Vitae – page 5 • 2014-2018 – [Co_PI] Institut National du Cancer (INCa) Grant (France; INCa 2014-123): “ Targets and trials: a sociological investigation of personalized cancer medicine in action (PERSONA)” (with Pascale Bourret PI, Patrick Castel and Henri Bergeron) – €259,376. • 2014-2018 – [PI] Canadian Institutes of Health Research Grant (MOP-133687): “Genomic medicine enters the clinic: translational research, actionable mutations, clinical utility, and the reframing of oncology” (with Peter Keating and Nicole Nelson) – $324,676. • 2013-2015 – [Collaborator] Institut National du Cancer (INCa) Grant (France; “subvention de recherche hors appel à projet”): “Analyse qualitative des SIRIC (Sites de Recherche
Recommended publications
  • PDF Download Starting with Science Strategies for Introducing Young Children to Inquiry 1St Edition Ebook
    STARTING WITH SCIENCE STRATEGIES FOR INTRODUCING YOUNG CHILDREN TO INQUIRY 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Marcia Talhelm Edson | 9781571108074 | | | | | Starting with Science Strategies for Introducing Young Children to Inquiry 1st edition PDF Book The presentation of the material is as good as the material utilizing star trek analogies, ancient wisdom and literature and so much more. Using Multivariate Statistics. Michael Gramling examines the impact of policy on practice in early childhood education. Part of a series on. Schauble and colleagues , for example, found that fifth grade students designed better experiments after instruction about the purpose of experimentation. For example, some suggest that learning about NoS enables children to understand the tentative and developmental NoS and science as a human activity, which makes science more interesting for children to learn Abd-El-Khalick a ; Driver et al. Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. The authors begin with theory in a cultural context as a foundation. What makes professional development effective? Frequently, the term NoS is utilised when considering matters about science. This book is a documentary account of a young intern who worked in the Reggio system in Italy and how she brought this pedagogy home to her school in St. Taking Science to School answers such questions as:. The content of the inquiries in science in the professional development programme was based on the different strands of the primary science curriculum, namely Living Things, Energy and Forces, Materials and Environmental Awareness and Care DES Exit interview. Begin to address the necessity of understanding other usually peer positions before they can discuss or comment on those positions.
    [Show full text]
  • GLOCAL Ization and Sustainability of Science Education Research And
    e c i t c a r P d n a h c r a e s e R n o i t a c u d E e c n e i c S f o y it il b a in ta s u S d an n io at Liz CA GLO 11130 Sunrise Valley Drive | Suite 350 | Reston, Virginia 20191 | USA www.narst.org | info@narst.org | 703.234.4138 | fax 703.435.4390 Saturday, April 22, 2017 NARST 2017 Annual International Conference Abstracts Pre-Conference Workshop #1: Equity and Ethics Committee (Free – 90 participants max) Glocalization and Sustainability of Science Education Research and Practice 8:00am – 11:45am, Hyatt Lone Star F Organizers: Enrique Lopez Nam-Hwa Kang Tasneem Anwar Senetta Bancroft Phillip Boda Tamra-Kay Alisa Francis Deniz Saribas Azam Saiqa Sheron Mark, University of Louisville ABSTRACT: Globalization and sustainability in science education has increasingly received attention among educators, researchers, and policymakers. Cultivating a scientifically literate citizenry has been tied to the concepts of globalization and sustainability. As highlighted in NARST’s conference theme description, glocalization represents a dual perspective which combines the ideals of globalization with the importance of localization. Pre-conference workshop participants will engage in constructive and meaningful dialogue with leading science education scholars about the influences of glocalization on educators, researchers, and policymakers’ efforts to build and sustain scientific literacy within local contexts for a global citizenry. Through an equity and ethics lens, this workshop will pay special attention to understanding the concepts of glocalization, sustainability, and scientific literacy; exploring how these concepts have been used within science education practice, research, and policy; and critiquing the benefits and limitations glocalization and sustainability offer the science education community.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge Visualization in Environmental Communication Capturing Politicized Debates with Discourse Mapping
    Proceedings of RSD5 Symposium, Toronto, 2016 Knowledge Visualization in Environmental Communication Capturing Politicized Debates with Discourse Mapping Dr. Joanna Boehnert, University of Westminster (H3) Abstract Mapping controversies on environmental issues is a good starting point for learning about their complexities. One way to accomplish this task is through discourse mapping. Discourses are shared ways of understanding the world. Diverse values, vested interests, critical perspectives and insights are embedded within discourses. These both reflect and construct attitudes towards the natural world. Discourse mapping is an interpretative method that can reveal political strategies, ideologies and tactics. In displaying the distinctions between discourses, the outlines of controversies are clarified. This paper contributes to a theory of knowledge visualization and presents two discourse mapping projects (one completed project and one that is in its initial stages) on environmental themes: Mapping Climate Communication (2014) and Mapping Degrowth (2016 - 2017). Knowledge visualization captures meaning lost with more reductive visualization methods. Introduction: Visualising Wicked Problems Environmental problems are typically wicked problems that are difficult to solve and also difficult or impossible to objectively define (Rittel and Weber 1973). Since the very definition of many environmental problems depends on how they are understood, the controversies that emerge in attempting to define and address them are sites of intense debate. Definitions vary according to diverse perspectives and ideologies. These various ways of understanding environmental dilemmas underlie different approaches towards the development and design of solutions. One way that environmental communicators and theorists deal with this problem is by identifying distinct environmental discourses. Political scientist John Dryzek’s seminal work The Politics of the Earth (2013) is one of most comprehensive overviews of the dominant environmental discourses (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory
    The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory This companion explores ANT as an intellectual practice, tracking its movements and engagements with a wide range of other academic and activist projects. Showcasing the work of a diverse set of ‘second generation’ ANT scholars from around the world, it highlights the exciting depth and breadth of contemporary ANT and its future possibilities. The companion has 38 chapters, each answering a key question about ANT and its capacities. Early chapters explore ANT as an intellectual practice and highlight ANT’s dialogues with other fields and key theorists. Others open critical, provocative discussions of its limitations. Later sections explore how ANT has been developed in a range of so cial scientific fields and how it has been used to explore a wide range of scales and sites. Chapters in the final section discuss ANT’s involvement in ‘real world’ endeavours such as disability and environmental activism, and even running a Chilean hospital. Each chapter contains an overview of relevant work and introduces original examples and ideas from the authors’ recent research. The chapters orient readers in rich, complex fields and can be read in any order or combination. Throughout the volume, authors mobilise ANT to explore and account for a range of exciting case studies: from wheelchair activism to parliamentary decision-making; from racial profiling to energy consumption monitoring; from queer sex to Korean cities. A comprehensive introduction by the editors explores the significance of ANT more broadly and provides an overview of the volume. The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory will be an inspiring and lively companion to aca- demics and advanced undergraduates and postgraduates from across many disciplines across the social sciences, including Sociology, Geography, Politics and Urban Studies, Environmental Studies and STS, and anyone wishing to engage with ANT, to understand what it has already been used to do and to imagine what it might do in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Controversies and Their Publics Tommaso Venturini, Donato Ricci, Michele Mauri, Lucy Kimbell, Axel Meunier
    Designing Controversies and Their Publics Tommaso Venturini, Donato Ricci, Michele Mauri, Lucy Kimbell, Axel Meunier To cite this version: Tommaso Venturini, Donato Ricci, Michele Mauri, Lucy Kimbell, Axel Meunier. Designing Contro- versies and Their Publics. Design Issues, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press (MIT Press), 2015, 31 (3), pp.74 - 87. 10.1162/DESI_a_00340. hal-01672300 HAL Id: hal-01672300 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01672300 Submitted on 23 Dec 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Designing Controversies and Their Publics Tommaso Venturini, Donato Ricci, Michele Mauri, Lucy Kimbell, Axel Meunier Figure 1 Two maps both unsatisfactory but for opposite reasons. (Daniele Guido, Sciences Po médialab) Asking the Right Question Twenty years ago, Bruno Latour conceived Controversy Mapping (CM) as a method to train students in the observation and descrip- tion of sociotechnical debates.1 Since then, CM has evolved consid- erably, not only because of the many universities that have adopted and adjusted it to their context,2 but also because CM has become 3 1 Bruno Latour, “La cartographie des the pivot point of several international research projects. controverses,” Technology Review, Since the very beginning of this enterprise, it has been clear N.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracing Sources of Design Uncertainty and Controversy in Web 2.0 Facilitated Collaborative Design Process
    The African Journal of Information Systems Volume 10 Issue 2 Article 2 4-1-2018 Tracing sources of design uncertainty and controversy in Web 2.0 facilitated collaborative design process Lockias Chitanana Dr Midlands State University, chitananal@staff.msu.ac.zw Desmond Wesley Govender Dr University of KwaZulu-Natal, govenderd50@ukzn.ac.za Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ajis Part of the Engineering Education Commons, Instructional Media Design Commons, Management Information Systems Commons, and the Online and Distance Education Commons Recommended Citation Chitanana, Lockias Dr and Govender, Desmond Wesley Dr (2018) "Tracing sources of design uncertainty and controversy in Web 2.0 facilitated collaborative design process," The African Journal of Information Systems: Vol. 10 : Iss. 2 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/ajis/vol10/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in The African Journal of Information Systems by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact digitalcommons@kennesaw.edu. Chitanana and Govender Uncertainty and Controversy in Web 2.0 facilitated Design Process Tracing sources of design uncertainty and controversy in Web 2.0 facilitated collaborative design process Research Paper Volume 10, Issue 2, April 2018, ISSN 1936-0282 Lockias Chitanana Desmond Wesley Govender Midlands State University University of KwaZulu-Natal chitananal@staff.msu.ac.zw govenderd50@ukzn.ac.za (Received September 2017, accepted February 2018) ABSTRACT The integration of Internet-based collaborative tools such as Web 2.0 technologies to facilitate the design process has rendered collaborative design a chaotic practice filled with controversy and uncertainty, with the inevitable risk of unintended consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • D Moats Thesis Final 7 Jan 2016 Full
    DECENTRING DEVICES: Developing Quali-Quantitative Techniques for Studying Controversies with Online Platforms David Moats Sociology, Goldsmiths, University of London Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) 2015 1 DECLARATION I hereby declare that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Wherever contributions of others are involved, these are clearly acknowledged. David Moats 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS As STS scholars are well aware, any research project is always a distributed accomplishment, but this is more obviously the case in the Wild West of digital research. Firstly, I am grateful to the ESRC for funding such an experimental project and of course to my brilliant supervisors Noortje Marres and David Oswell who set the bar very high and continued to make insightful and challenging comments throughout. I could not have asked for a better pair of voices jostling in my head. A different version of the argument in Chapter II and the tool developed in Chapter VI have appeared in the article Mapping Controversies with Social Media: The Case for Symmetry with Noortje Marres (2015). I also want to thank the entire team at the Digital Methods Initiative and the Média Lab for their support, both technical and intellectual. I have benefitted considerably from discussions with Richard Rogers, Tommaso Venturini, Bernhard Rieder, Sabine Niederer and Carolin Gerlitz. A collaboration with Erik Borra led to the creation of the URL sequencer in Chapter VI, which he was kind enough to incorporate into the DMI TCAT interface. Gabriele Colombo, Federica Bardelli, Carlo di Gaetano and Alessandro Brunetti from Density Design all made helpful suggestions on the visualisations presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Controversies and Their Publics Tommaso Venturini, Donato Ricci, Michele Mauri, Lucy Kimbell, Axel Meunier
    Designing Controversies and their Publics Tommaso Venturini, Donato Ricci, Michele Mauri, Lucy Kimbell, Axel Meunier To cite this version: Tommaso Venturini, Donato Ricci, Michele Mauri, Lucy Kimbell, Axel Meunier. Designing Contro- versies and their Publics. Design Issues, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press (MIT Press), 2015, 31 (3), pp.74-87. 10.1162/DESI_a_00340. hal-01835263 HAL Id: hal-01835263 https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01835263 Submitted on 11 Jul 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Designing Controversies and their Publics Tommaso Venturini, Donato Ricci, Michele Mauri, Lucy Kimbell, Axel Meunier Keywords Controversy mapping; communication design; science and technology studies; information visualization; participatory design Abstract Controversy mapping is a teaching and research method derived from the Science and Technology Studies and meant to explore and represent modern sociotechnical issues. Striving to make the intricacy of scientific debate readable for a larger public, controversy mapping is trapped in a classic simplicity/complexity trade-off: how to respect the richness of controversies without designing maps too complicated to be useful? Having worked on the question for almost two years in a project bringing together social scientists and designers (emapsproject.com1), we can now propose a way out of this contradiction and suggest three ways of moving through the simplicity/complexity continuum.
    [Show full text]
  • Building on Faults How to Represent Controversies with Digital Methods Tommaso Venturini (Public Understanding of Science, Forthcoming)
    Building on Faults How to Represent Controversies with Digital Methods Tommaso Venturini (Public Understanding of Science, Forthcoming) Abstract: In a previous article appeared in this journal, I1 introduced Bruno Latour’s cartography of controversies and I discussed half of it, namely how to observe techno-scientific controversies. In this article I will concentrate on the remaining half: how to represent the complexity of social debates in a legible form. In my previous paper, we learnt how to explore the richness of collective existence through Actor-Network Theory. In this one, I will discuss how to render such complexity through an original visualization device: the controversy-website. Capitalizing on the potential of digital technologies, the controversy-website has been developed as a multilayered toolkit to trace and aggregate information on public debates. Keywords: cartography of controversies, digital methods, web cartography, information visualization, scientific controversies, representations of science, public understanding of science, actor-network theory No exploration without representation The cartography of controversies is a set of techniques to investigate public disputes especially, but not exclusively, around technoscientific issues. It was introduced by Bruno Latour as a didactic exercise in Actor-Network Theory (ANT), but it gradually evolved into a full research method thanks to the contributions of a large research and teaching community2. Documenting such method is the aim of this article and of a previous work published in this journal (Venturini, 2009). In that paper, I discussed how to observe controversies through an ANT approach. In this paper, I will propose some descriptive techniques. To be sure, such distinction is largely artificial.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19: When Species and Data Meet
    Covid-19: When Species and Data Meet Abstract This article explores how species meet, in particular humans and Covid-19. It also draws attention to the digital world through the lens of contact-tracing apps. Here, we find ourselves examining human-virus-data relations, with species and data meeting and mingling. This article does not study Covid-19 in isolation, but reaches beyond to examine what has led us to this situation and the role data is currently playing. The article offers an answer to the question: How do humans, Covid-19 and Covid-19 contact-tracing apps meet and mingle? This article examines how species meet and mingle, as well as how the Anthropocene has contributed to the current situation. The article also discusses contact-tracing apps and what these apps mean for society. In the final section, the article shows how entanglements are not constrained to those which are multispecies, but also stretch out to the digital. These postdigital hybrid assemblages enable the coming together of humans, biological more than human worlds, and the digital. Hopefully, this discussion about the postdigital hybrid assemblage will contribute to discussions in the future, and long after Covid-19, about how we are living our lives, and who and what we are living our lives with. Keywords Covid-19, Species Meeting, More than Human Worlds, Data, Contact-tracing Apps, Postdigital Hybrid Assemblage, Anthropocene Introduction This article explores how species meet, in particular humans and Covid-19. It also draws attention to the postdigital world using digital contact-tracing apps as an example.
    [Show full text]
  • Katrine Lotz Nordic 03
    Architecture, Design and Conservation Danish Portal for Artistic and Scientific Research Aarhus School of Architecture // Design School Kolding // Royal Danish Academy Mapping architectural controversies Lotz, Katrine Published in: Nordic Journal of Architecture Publication date: 2012 Document Version: Early version, also known as pre-print Link to publication Citation for pulished version (APA): Lotz, K. (2012). Mapping architectural controversies. Nordic Journal of Architecture, 2(3), 140-141. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 03. Oct. 2021 XXXREVIEWS tions of architecture that have passed as the economy, politics, “the social,” Architecture their “sell-by” dates. The first subject or “the zeitgeist,” in which the build- AS Moving scrutinized is the kind of representa- ing itself finally disappears. From these Projects tionalism that accepts designation of well-argued reckonings, Yaneva makes a symbols in architecture as a sufficient strong argument for the MAC approach Albena Yaneva: explanation of the relation between that refuses to admit this traffic of ana- Mapping Architectural Controversies architecture and society.
    [Show full text]
  • SS2016 Mapping Controversies.Pdf
    Professur für Partizipative Technikgestaltung (Prof. Dr. Ignacio Farías) Munich Center for Technology in Society and Department of Architecture Technische Universität München Mapping controversies in science, technology and architecture 3 ECTS / SS16 Lehrende: Prof. Dr. Ignacio Farías / Dr. Laurie Waller Introduction: Controversies are open, critical and creative situations, in which fundamental features of the social are reshuffled, incuding definitions of what is an entity, what is agency, what are the effects of actions, what is a fact, what is a prejudice or what is valuable. In controversies the boundaries between politics and science, technology and aesthetics, lay knowledge and expertise are suspended and redrawn. Techno-scientific contro- versies are a rich empirical field to study the crafting, assembling and disassembling of scientific knowledge and technological innovations, as well as the democratization challenges associated to techno-scientific change. In the last years, controversy ana- lysis has also proved useful to study environmental issues, such as global warming, as well as urban development and architectural projects. This seminar provides a theore- tical and practical introduction into a set of concepts, research strategies, methodolo- gical tools and analytical techniques that have been developed in the field of science and technology studies for the study of controversies. Learning objectives: 1. To understand and identify different conceptualizations and analytical approa- ches to controversies. 2. To sharpen the attention towards current public debates as potentially contro- versial events in which the social is reshaped. 3. To gain detailed knowledge about one current controversy in science, technolo- gy or architecture, its actors, claims, and dynamics. 4. To acquire practical abilities for working with digital methods and social network visualization techniques.
    [Show full text]