Cell Biology in Environmental Toxicology OIHANE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cell Biology in Environmental Toxicology OIHANE Department of Zoology and Animal Cell Biology Research Group: Cell Biology in Environmental Toxicology “TRANSCRIPTOMIC TOOLS AND GENE EXPRESSION PROFILES OF TOXIC CHEMICAL EXPOSURE IN AQUATIC POLLUTION SENTINEL ORGANISMS” International PhD Thesis submitted by OIHANE DIAZ DE CERIO ARRUABARRENA for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor Under the supervision of Dr. IBON CANCIO URIARTE Leioa, July 2012 TESIAREN ZUZENDARIAREN BAIMENA TESIA AURKEZTEKO IBON CANCIO URIARTE jaunak, 30616453A I.F.Z. zenbakia duenak “TRANSCRIPTOMIC TOOLS AND GENE EXPRESSION PROFILES OF TOXIC CHEMICAL EXPOSURE IN AQUATIC POLLUTION SENTINEL ORGANISMS” izenburua duen doktorego-tesiaren zuzendari naizenak, tesia aurkezteko baimena ematen dut, defendatua izateko baldintzak betetzen dituelako. OIHANE DIAZ DE CERIO ARRUABARRENA doktoregai andereak egin du aipaturiko tesia, ZOOLOGIA ETA ANIMALIA ZELULEN BIOLOGIA sailean. Leioan, 2012ko uztailaren 26 TESIAREN ZUZENDARIA Iz.: Ibon Cancio Uriarte SAILAREN ADOSTASUNA ZOOLOGIA ETA ANIMALIA ZELULEN BIOLOGIA Saileko Kontseiluak, 2012ko ekaineko 13ko bileran, “TRANSCRIPTOMIC TOOLS AND GENE EXPRESSION PROFILES OF TOXIC CHEMICAL EXPOSURE IN AQUATIC POLLUTION SENTINEL ORGANISMS” izenburua duen doktorego-tesia aurkeztearen alde dagoela adierazi du. IBON CANCIO URIARTE jaunaren zuzendaritzapean egin den tesi hori OIHANE DIAZ DE CERIO ARRUABARRENA andreak aurkeztu du sail honetan. Leioan, 2012ko uzatailaren 23 O. E. SAILEKO ZUZENDARIA SAILEKO IDAZKARIA Iz.: Juan Carlos Iturrondobeitia Bilbao Iz.: Maria del Carmen Barbero González DOKTORE GRADUAREN AKTA DOKTOREGO TESI DEFENTSAREN AKTA Doktoregai and.: OIHANE DIAZ DE CERIO ARRUABARRENA TESIAREN IZENBURUA: “TRANSCRIPTOMIC TOOLS AND GENE EXPRESSION PROFILES OF TOXIC CHEMICAL EXPOSURE IN AQUATIC POLLUTION SENTINEL ORGANISMS” UPV/EHUko Doktoregoko Azpibatzordeak goian adierazitako doktorego tesia kalifikatzeko aukeratutako epaimahaiak, eta adierazitako egunean bilduta, behin doktoregaiak defentsa eginda eta egin zaizkion objekzioak edota iradokizunak erantzunda, ___________________ (Aho batez edo gehiengoaz) eman du honako kalifikazioa: GAI edo EZ GAI Defentsan erabilitako hizkuntzak (hizkuntza bat baino gehiago erabili badira, zehaztu hizkuntza bakoitzean defendatutako atalak edo ehunekoak): INGELESA Leioan, 2012ko irailaren 26an PRESIDENTEA, IDAZKARIA Sin.: Sin.: Dk: ____________________ Dk: ______________________ 1. mahaikidea, 2. mahaikidea, 3. mahaikidea, Sin.: Sin.: Sin.: Dk: Dk: Dk: DOKTOREGAIA, Sin.: _____________________ THIS WORK WAS FUNDED BY A grant to consolidated research groups (GIC07/26–IT–393–07). The University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) through a grant to a Unit of Formation and Research (UFI 11/37). The European Commission (Directorate-General Environment) through the PRAGMA project (grant Nº 07.030900/2005/429172/SUB/A5). The Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (project CANCERMAR, CTM2006–06192/MAR). Basque Government (Strategic action ETORTEK–IMPRES 2003–2007 and ETORTEK K-EGOKITZEN-II and research projects SAIOTEK 2006 FISHtoTXIPS S- PR06UN02, SAIOTEK 2007 ITSASonTXIP S-PR07UN01; SAIOTEK 2009 IKERKOSTA S-PC08UN03 and SAIOTEK 2010 GULATOX S-PE09UN32; Special action AE-2008- 1-1 and research project URA 10/02). INDEX INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1 A. ECOTOXICOGENOMICS .................................................................................... 3 A.1. Teleost genome and gene information ................................................... 7 A.2. Gene and genome information regarding mollusc ............................... 11 B. HOW IS A GENOME OR A TRANCRIPTOME SEQUENCED? .................. 14 B.1. First sequencing generation (FSG) ........................................................ 14 B.1.1. Application of automated FGS ................................................... 17 B.2. Second (next) generation sequencing (SGS) ......................................... 20 B.3. Third generation sequencing technologies (TGS) ................................. 25 B.4. Sequence banking and classification ..................................................... 32 B.4.1. Fish gene sequence databases ................................................... 33 B.4.2. Mollusc gene sequence database .............................................. 32 C TOOLS FOR THE ANALYSIS AND QUANTIFICATION OF GENE TRANSCRIPTION PROFILES .................................................................. 34 D GENE TR ANSCRIPTION PROFILING IN ECOTOXICOLOGY ...................... 40 E CONCLUDING REMARKS ..................................................................... 49 STATE OF THE ART ........................................................................... 75 HYPOTHESIS ............................................................................................. 79 OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................. 79 RESULTS ........................................................................................... 83 Chapter 1: Construction and characterization of a forward subtracted library of blue mussels Mytilus edulis for the identification of gene transcription signatures and biomarkers of styrene exposure ...................... 85 Chapter 2 : Regulation of xenobiotic transporter and immune/inflammation related genes in liver and brain of juvenile thicklip grey mullets ( Chelon labrosus ) after exposure to Prestige- like fuel oil and to perfluorooctane sulfonate ............................................. 109 Chapter 3 : Toxicology tailored low density microarray for the thicklip grey mullet, Chelon labrosus : development, production and validation ..................................................................................................... 143 Chapter 4 : Gene transcription profiling in caged sentinel thicklip grey mullets ( Chelon labrosus ) and active biomonitoring in a polluted harbour ........................................................................................................ 183 Chapter 5 : Hepatic transcriptional profiles of tributyltin exposure in thicklip grey mullet ( Chelon labrosus ) and the obesogenic theory ............. 219 Chapter 6 : 5S rRNA and accompanying proteins in gonads, powerful markers to identify sex and reproductive endocrine disruption in fish ............................................................................................................... 259 Chapter 7 : Construction of a high throughput gene expression microarray after 454 pyrosequencing of the multitissue transcriptome of the European eel Anguilla anguilla .................................. 299 GENERAL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ................................. 323 SUMMARY AND GENERAL DISCUSSION ................................................ 325 CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................... 331 THESIS .................................................................................................... 333 CONTRIBUTORS AND THANKS .................................................................... 339 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Abbreviations A, Adenine JGI , Joint Genome Institute AGC , Anguilla genomic consortium NCBI , National Centre for Biotechnology bp , Base pair Information C, Cytosine NGS , Next generation sequencing CAT , Clonally amplified template NIG , National institute of Genetics cDNA, Complementary deoxyribonucleic acid PAH , Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon CIB , Centre for Bioinformatics PCR , Polymerase chain reaction CRT , cyclic reverse termination Ref-seq, Reference sequence DDBJ , DNA Data Bank of Japan RT-PCR , Reverse transcription Polymerase ddRT-PCR , Differential display chain reaction retrotranscriptase polymerase chain SAGE , Serial Analysis of Gene Expression reaction SBH, Sequencing by hybridization ddRT-PCR , differential display RT-PCR SBL , Sequencing by ligation EBI , European Bioinformatics institute SBS , Sequencing by synthesis emPCR , Emulsion PCR, SGS , Second generation sequencing ENA , European Nucleotide Archive SMS , Single molecule sequencing EST , Expressed sequence tag SMT, Single molecule template FGS , First generation sequencing SNA , Single nucleotide addition method G, Guanine SRA , Sequence read archive GOLD, Genomes Online Database SSH , Suppression subtractive hybridization INSDC, International Nucleotide Sequence T, Thymine Database Collaboration TGS , Third generation sequencing 2 A. ECOTOXICOGENOMICS A. ECOTOXICOGENOMICS Some structures in many chemicals, mainly man made, are estrange to biological structures (xenobiotics), and are driving changes in the environment faster and in more varied ways than ever experienced by Earth ecosystems. Nowadays the European markets offer around 100,000 chemical substances, and almost a third of them are produced in volumes that exceed 1 ton (1-100 tons) per year (Hengstler et al., 2006). If scientific and regulatory efforts in the 20 th century were centred in establishing which chemicals caused damage to human health (toxicology), a little branch of scientists were worried about which chemicals caused effects or damage to ecosystems (ecotoxicology). Then, the challenge in ecotoxicology for the 21 st century has become to understand the “mechanisms of toxicity” of this milieu of chemicals affecting different wildlife species. Laying on the basis of the way in which wildlife organisms cope with the changing environment, with fluctuations in biotic and abiotic conditions,
Recommended publications
  • 1 Exon Probe Sets and Bioinformatics Pipelines for All Levels of Fish Phylogenomics
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.18.949735; this version posted February 19, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Exon probe sets and bioinformatics pipelines for all levels of fish phylogenomics 2 3 Lily C. Hughes1,2,3,*, Guillermo Ortí1,3, Hadeel Saad1, Chenhong Li4, William T. White5, Carole 4 C. Baldwin3, Keith A. Crandall1,2, Dahiana Arcila3,6,7, and Ricardo Betancur-R.7 5 6 1 Department of Biological Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. 7 2 Computational Biology Institute, Milken Institute of Public Health, George Washington 8 University, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. 9 3 Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian 10 Institution, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. 11 4 College of Fisheries and Life Sciences, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China 12 5 CSIRO Australian National Fish Collection, National Research Collections of Australia, 13 Hobart, TAS, Australia 14 6 Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, Norman, O.K., U.S.A. 15 7 Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, O.K., U.S.A. 16 17 *Corresponding author: Lily C. Hughes, [email protected]. 18 Current address: Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, 19 Chicago, IL. 20 21 Keywords: Actinopterygii, Protein coding, Systematics, Phylogenetics, Evolution, Target 22 capture 23 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.18.949735; this version posted February 19, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Measurement of Long-Term Bower Behaviors in Lake Malawi
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.27.968511; this version posted February 28, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. 1 1 Automated measurement of long-term bower behaviors in Lake Malawi cichlids using 2 depth sensing and action recognition 3 4 Zachary V Johnson1, Lijiang Long1,2, Junyu Li1, Manu Tej Sharma Arrojwala1, Vineeth Aljapur1, 5 Tyrone Lee1, Mark C Lowder1, Karen Gu1, Tucker J Lancaster1,2, Joseph I Stockert1, Jean M 6 Moorman3, Rachel L Lecesne4, Jeffrey T Streelman# 1,2,3, and Patrick T McGrath# 1,2,3,5 7 8 1School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA 9 2Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Quantitative Biosciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, 10 Atlanta, GA 30332, USA 11 3Parker H. Petit Institute of Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, 12 Atlanta, GA 30332, USA 13 4School of Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA 14 5School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA 15 16 #Co-corresponding authors: [email protected] (P.T.M.), 17 [email protected] (J.T.S.) 18 19 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.27.968511; this version posted February 28, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Furf Handout 2016.Pdf
    0 College of Science – Fall Undergraduate Research Fair 2016 Welcome! The purpose of this event is to provide science students with an opportunity to get many of their questions answered about undergraduate research. Not only about how to get more involved in research, but also how to get more out of the research experience itself. Throughout and beyond the College of Science there are many different ways in which students can get involved in research. Often it’s just a question of looking in the right places and being persistent in the hunt for the right opportunity. However, getting the right opportunity is also about getting as much information as possible from a diversity of sources. This could be as simple as a fellow student but there are many organizations, institutes, and centers on campus that are also more than willing to help a student find and support their research endeavors. Furthermore, there are many ways for students to get even more out of their research experience, through publishing and presenting their research to their peers. Through a combination of listening to speakers, poster presenters, and representatives from various institutions, students should be able to get some ideas about how best to get started looking for research opportunities. Also, students should be able to see how they can add value to their research experience by participating in other related activities. The sooner a student begins the search, the sooner they will be able to start participating in undergraduate research and getting the most
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Methods
    Supplemental Methods Collection and Preparation After extraction, the DNA samples were sheared with a 1.5 blunt end needles (Jensen Global, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) and run through pulse field gel electrophoresis, in order to separate large DNA molecules, for 16 hours. Samples were checked with a spectrophotometer (Synergy H1 Hybrid Reader, BioTek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT) and Qubit® fluorometer for quantification of our genomic DNA. Illumina and Pacbio Hybrid Assembly, Genome Size Estimation, and Quality Assessment All computational and bioinformatics analyses were conducted on the High Performance Computing (HPC) Cluster located that University of California, Irvine. Sequence data generated from two lanes of Illumina HiSeq 2500 were concatenated and raw sequence reads were assembled through PLATANUS v1.2.1 (1), which accounts for heterozygous diploid sequence data. Parameters used for PLATANUS was -m 256 (memory) and -t 48 (threads) for this initial assembly. Afterwards, contigs assembled from PLATANUS and reads from 40 SMRT cells of PacBio sequencing were assembled with a hybrid assembler DBG2OLC v1.0 (2). We used the following parameters in DBG2OLC: k 17 KmerCovTh 2 MinOverlap 20 AdaptiveTh 0.01 LD1 0 and RemoveChimera 1 and ran pbdagcon with default parameters. Without Illumina sequence reads, we also conducted a PacBio reads only assembly with FALCON v0.3.0 (https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/FALCON) with default parameters in order to assemble PacBio reads into contiguous sequences. The parameters we used were input type = raw, length_cutoff = 4000, length_cutoff_pr = 8000, with different cluster settings 32, 16, 32, 8, 64, and 32 cores, concurrency setting jobs were 32, and the remaining were default parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Evolution Contributes to Hindbrain Diversification Among Lake Malawi Cichlid Fish
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Behavioral evolution contributes to hindbrain diversifcation among Lake Malawi cichlid fsh Ryan A. York1,2*, Allie Byrne1, Kawther Abdilleh3, Chinar Patil3, Todd Streelman3, Thomas E. Finger4,5 & Russell D. Fernald1,6 The evolutionary diversifcation of animal behavior is often associated with changes in the structure and function of nervous systems. Such evolutionary changes arise either through alterations of individual neural components (“mosaically”) or through scaling of the whole brain (“concertedly”). Here we show that the evolution of a courtship behavior in Malawi cichlid fsh is associated with rapid, extensive, and specifc diversifcation of orosensory, gustatory centers in the hindbrain. We fnd that hindbrain volume varies signifcantly between species that build pit (depression) compared to castle (mound) type bowers and that this trait is evolving rapidly among castle-building species. Molecular analyses of neural activity via immediate early gene expression indicate a functional role for hindbrain structures during bower building. Finally, comparisons of bower building species in neighboring Lake Tanganyika suggest parallel patterns of neural diversifcation to those in Lake Malawi. Our results suggest that mosaic brain evolution via alterations to individual brain structures is more extensive and predictable than previously appreciated. Animal behaviors vary widely, as do their neural phenotypes1. Evolutionary neuroscience identifes how the brain diversifes over time and space in response to selective pressures2. A key goal of evolutionary neuroscience has been to identify whether brain structures evolve independently (“mosaically”) or in tandem with each other as they refect key life history traits, especially behavior3–6. While a number of studies have linked variation in brain structure with other traits across evolutionary time2,7–9, it remains unclear whether or not this variation is predict- able.
    [Show full text]
  • CARES Exchange April 2017 2 GS CD 4-16-17 1
    The CARES Exchange Volume I Number 2 CARESCARES AreaArea ofof ConcernConcern LakeLake MalawiMalawi April 2017 CARESCARES ClubClub DataData SubmissionSubmission isis AprilApril 30th!30th! TheThe DirectoryDirectory ofof AvailableAvailable CARESCARES SpeciesSpecies NewestNewest AdditionsAdditions toto thethe CARESCARES TeamTeam NewNew EnglandEngland CichlidCichlid AssociationAssociation CARESCARES 2 Welcome to the The CARES Exchange. The pri- CARES, review the ‘CARES Startup’ tab on the web- mary intent of this publication is to make available a site CARESforfish.org, then contact Klaus Steinhaus listing of CARES fish from the CARES membership at [email protected]. to those that may be searching for CARES species. ___________________________________________ This issue of The Exchange was release to coincide It is important to understand that all transactions are with the due date for CARES Member Clubs to make between the buyer and seller and CARES in no way your data submissions. All submissions must be sub- moderates any exchanges including shipping prob- mitted by April 30th in the new file format. Learn lems, refunds, or bad blood between the two parties. more on page 7. This directory merely provides an avenue to which CARES fish may be located. As with all sales, be cer- Pam Chin explains the stressors affecting Lake Ma- tain that all the elements of the exchange are worked lawi. Pay close attention to what is going on there! out before purchasing or shipping. Take your CARES role seriously. Without your ef- forts, the fish we enjoy today might not be around to- No hybrids will knowingly be listed. morrow, There is no cost to place a for sale ad.
    [Show full text]
  • Receptor Evolution, Neuronal Circuits and Behavior in the Model Organism Zebrafish Inaugur
    Amine detection in aquatic organisms: receptor evolution, neuronal circuits and behavior in the model organism zebrafish Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität zu Köln vorgelegt von Milan Dieris aus Berlin Köln, 2018 Berichterstatter: Prof. Dr. Sigrun Korsching Prof. Dr. Peter Kloppenburg Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 11.12.2017 ABSTRACT Olfactory cues are responsible for the generation of diverse behaviors in the animal kingdom. Olfactory receptors are expressed by specialized sensory neurons (OSNs) in the olfactory epithelium. Upon odorant binding to the olfactory receptor, these neurons are activated. The information is transferred to the olfactory bulb glomeruli, which represent the first relay station for olfactory processing in the brain. Most olfactory receptors are G-protein coupled receptors and form large gene families. One type of olfactory receptors is the trace amine-associated receptor family (TAAR). TAARs generally recognize amines. One particular member of the zebrafish TAAR family, TAAR13c, is a high- affinity receptor for the death-associated odor cadaverine, which induces aversive behavior. Here, we identified the cell type of amine-sensitive OSNs in the zebrafish nose, which show typical properties of ciliated neurons. We used OSN type-specific markers to unambiguously characterize zebrafish TAAR13c OSNs. Using the neuronal activity marker pERK we could show that low concentrations of cadaverine activate a specific, invariant glomerulus in the dorso- lateral cluster of glomeruli (dlG) in the olfactory bulb of zebrafish. This cluster was also shown to process amine stimuli in general, a feature that is conserved in the neoteleost stickleback. Apart from developing a technique to measure neuronal activity in the adult olfactory epithelium, we also established the use of GCaMP6-expressing zebrafish to measure neuronal activity in the larval brain.
    [Show full text]
  • Genomic Basis of Evolutionary Radiation in Lake Malawi Cichlids
    GENOMIC BASIS OF EVOLUTIONARY RADIATION IN LAKE MALAWI CICHLIDS A Dissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty by Chinar Patil In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Biology in the School of Biological Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology December 2018 COPYRIGHT © 2018 BY CHINAR PATIL GENOMIC BASIS OF ADAPTIVE RADIATION IN LAKE MALAWI CICHLIDS Approved by: Dr. J T Streelman, Advisor Dr. Michael Goodisman School of Biological Sciences School of Biological Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Soojin Yi Dr. Fredrik O. Vannberg School of Biological Sciences School of Biological Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Reade B. Roberts W. M. Keck Center for Behavioral Biology Comparative Medicine Institute North Carolina State University Date Approved: [October 31, 2018 ] Dedicated to Neha Ahirrao and Palvi Patil. One for the past, one for the future. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to begin by thanking my advisor Todd Streelman for standing by me through thick and thin, teaching me valuable lessons and doing a lot of the heavy lifting required to make me the scientist I am today. I would also like to thank past and present members of the Streelman Lab, too many to name all, but in no particular order, Nick Parnell, Kawther Abdilleh, Jon Sylvester, Karen Pottin, Amanda Ballard, Natalie Haddad, Paula Lavantucksin, Zack Johnson, Teresa Fowler and many others. Beyond just the Streelman lab, I have had the privilege of collaborating with other labs, learning from professors at Georgia Tech . I would like to thank Ryan York, Soojin Yi, Michael Goodisman, Patrick McGrath, Fred Vannberg, Reade Roberts, Joe Lachance among others.
    [Show full text]
  • Download.Soe.Ucsc.Edu/Admin/Exe/Linux.X86 64/FOOTER) Axtchain Tool with - 539 Minscore=5000
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.12.336453; this version posted October 12, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Genome-enabled inference of functional genetic variants in the face, brain and behavior 2 3 4 5 Chinar Patil1, Jonathan B. Sylvester1,2, Kawther Abdilleh1, Michael W. Norsworthy3,4, 6 Karen Pottin5, Milan Malinsky6,7, Ryan F. Bloomquist1,8, Zachary V. Johnson1, Patrick T. 7 McGrath1, Jeffrey T. Streelman1 8 9 10 Affiliations: 11 1School of Biological Sciences and Petit Institute of Bioengineering and Bioscience, 12 Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA. 13 2Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA 14 3Catalog Technologies Inc., Boston, MA, USA. 15 4Freedom of Form Foundation, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA. 16 5Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement (IBPS-LBD, UMR7622), Sorbonne 17 Université, CNRS, Institut de Biologie Paris Seine, Paris, France. 18 6Zoological Institute, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, 19 Switzerland. 20 7Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 21 8Augusta University, Department of Oral Biology and Diagnostic Sciences, Department 22 of Restorative Sciences, Dental College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA. bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.12.336453; this version posted October 12, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Genome Evolution in the Light of Fish Cytogenomics and Rdnaomics
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review Vertebrate Genome Evolution in the Light of Fish Cytogenomics and rDNAomics Radka Symonová 1,* ID and W. Mike Howell 2 1 Faculty of Science, Department of Biology, University of Hradec Králové, 500 03 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic 2 Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +420-776-121-054 Received: 30 November 2017; Accepted: 29 January 2018; Published: 14 February 2018 Abstract: To understand the cytogenomic evolution of vertebrates, we must first unravel the complex genomes of fishes, which were the first vertebrates to evolve and were ancestors to all other vertebrates. We must not forget the immense time span during which the fish genomes had to evolve. Fish cytogenomics is endowed with unique features which offer irreplaceable insights into the evolution of the vertebrate genome. Due to the general DNA base compositional homogeneity of fish genomes, fish cytogenomics is largely based on mapping DNA repeats that still represent serious obstacles in genome sequencing and assembling, even in model species. Localization of repeats on chromosomes of hundreds of fish species and populations originating from diversified environments have revealed the biological importance of this genomic fraction. Ribosomal genes (rDNA) belong to the most informative repeats and in fish, they are subject to a more relaxed regulation than in higher vertebrates. This can result in formation of a literal ‘rDNAome’ consisting of more than 20,000 copies with their high proportion employed in extra-coding functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Did Hypertrophied Lips Evolve Once Or Repeatedly in Lake Malawi Cichlid Fishes? C
    Darrin Hulsey et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2018) 18:179 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1296-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Phylogenomics of a putatively convergent novelty: did hypertrophied lips evolve once or repeatedly in Lake Malawi cichlid fishes? C. Darrin Hulsey1* , Jimmy Zheng2, Roi Holzman3, Michael E. Alfaro2, Melisa Olave1 and Axel Meyer1 Abstract Background: Phylogenies provide critical information about convergence during adaptive radiation. To test whether there have been multiple origins of a distinctive trophic phenotype in one of the most rapidly radiating groups known, we used ultra-conserved elements (UCEs) to examine the evolutionary affinities of Lake Malawi cichlids lineages exhibiting greatly hypertrophied lips. Results: The hypertrophied lip cichlids Cheilochromis euchilus, Eclectochromis ornatus, Placidochromis “Mbenji fatlip”, and Placidochromis milomo areallnestedwithinthenon-mbunacladeofMalawi cichlids based on both concatenated sequence and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) inferred phylogenies. Lichnochromis acuticeps that exhibits slightly hypertrophied lips also appears to have evolutionary affinities to this group. However, Chilotilapia rhoadesii that lacks hypertrophied lips was recovered as nested within the species Cheilochromis euchilus. Species tree reconstructions and analyses of introgression provided largely ambiguous patterns of Malawi cichlid evolution. Conclusions: Contrary to mitochondrial DNA phylogenies, bifurcating trees based on our 1024 UCE loci supported close affinities of Lake Malawi lineages with hypertrophied lips. However, incomplete lineage sorting in Malawi tends to render these inferences more tenuous. Phylogenomic analyses will continue to provide powerful inferences about whether phenotypic novelties arose once or multiple times during adaptive radiation. Keywords: Adaptive radiation, East African Rift Lakes, Fatlips, Phylogenomics Background these adaptively radiating groups exceptionally difficult Phylogenies are critical to testing convergence.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Measurement of Long-Term Bower Behaviors in Lake Malawi
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Automated measurement of long‑term bower behaviors in Lake Malawi cichlids using depth sensing and action recognition Zachary V. Johnson1, Manu Tej Sharma Arrojwala1, Vineeth Aljapur1, Tyrone Lee1, Tucker J. Lancaster1,2, Mark C. Lowder1, Karen Gu1, Joseph I. Stockert1, Rachel L. Lecesne3, Jean M. Moorman3, Jefrey T. Streelman1,2* & Patrick T. McGrath1,2,4,5* In the wild, behaviors are often expressed over long time periods in complex and dynamic environments, and many behaviors include direct interaction with the environment itself. However, measuring behavior in naturalistic settings is difcult, and this has limited progress in understanding the mechanisms underlying many naturally evolved behaviors that are critical for survival and reproduction. Here we describe an automated system for measuring long‑term bower construction behaviors in Lake Malawi cichlid fshes, in which males use their mouths to sculpt sand into large species‑specifc structures for courtship and mating. We integrate two orthogonal methods, depth sensing and action recognition, to simultaneously track the developing bower structure and the thousands of individual sand manipulation behaviors performed throughout construction. By registering these two data streams, we show that behaviors can be topographically mapped onto a dynamic 3D sand surface through time. The system runs reliably in multiple species, across many aquariums simultaneously, and for up to weeks at a time. Using this system, we show strong diferences in construction behavior and bower form that refect species diferences in nature, and we gain new insights into spatial, temporal, social dimensions of bower construction, feeding, and quivering behaviors. Taken together, our work highlights how low‑cost tools can automatically quantify behavior in naturalistic and social environments over long timescales in the lab.
    [Show full text]