DOCSLIB.ORG

CB11 Statement of District Needs and Budget Priorities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CB11 Statement of District Needs and Budget Priorities Statements of Community District Needs and Community Board Budget Requests for Manhattan Community District 11 Fiscal Year 2019 Submitted to the Department of City Planning January 2018 INTRODUCTION The annual Statements of Community District Needs (CD Needs Statements) and Community Board Budget Requests (Budget Requests) are Charter mandates that form an integral part of the City's budget process. Together, they are intended to support communities in their ongoing consultations with city agencies, elected officials and other key stakeholders and influence more informed decision making on a broad range of local planning and budget priorities. This report also provides a valuable public resource for neighborhood planning and research purposes, and may be used by a variety of audiences seeking information about New York City's diverse communities. HOW TO USE THIS REPORT This report represents Manhattan Community Board 11’s Statement of Community District Needs and Community Board Budget Requests for Fiscal Year (FY) 2019. This report contains the formatted but otherwise unedited content provided by the community board, collected through an online form available to community boards from June to November 2017. Community boards may provide substantive supplemental information together with their Statements and Budget Requests. This supporting material can be accessed by clicking on the links provided in the document or by copying and pasting them into a web browser, such as Chrome, Safari or Firefox. If you have questions about this report or suggestions for changes please contact: [email protected] This report is broadly structured as follows: a) Overarching Community District Needs Sections 1 – 4 provide an overview of the community district and the top three pressing issues affecting this district overall as identified by the community board. Any narrative provided by the board supporting their selection of their top three pressing issues is included. b) Policy Area - Specific District Needs Section 5 is organized by seven distinct policy areas aligned with the service and program areas of city agencies. For each policy area, community boards selected the most important issue for their districts and could provide a supporting narrative. The policy area section also includes any agency-specific needs and a list of relevant budget requests submitted by the community board. If the community board submitted additional information outside of a specific policy area, it may be found in Section 6. c) Community Board Budget Requests The final section includes the two types of budget requests submitted to the City for the FY19 budget cycle; one list for capital and another for expense budget requests. For each budget request, community boards were able to provide a priority number, explanation, location, and supporters. OMB remains the definitive source on budget requests submitted to city agencies. Disclaimer This report represents the Statements of Community District Needs and Community Board Budget Requests of Manhattan Community Board 11 for Fiscal Year 2019. This report contains the formatted but otherwise unedited content provided by the community board. Budget Requests: Listed for informational purposes only. OMB remains the definitive source on budget requests and budget request responses. Budget Priorities: Priority numbers apply to expense and capital Budget requests from all policy areas. A complete list of expense and capital budget requests by this Board sorted by priority can be found in Section 7 of this document. Supporting Materials: Some community boards provided substantive supplemental information. This supportive material can be accessed by clicking on the links provided in the document or by copying and pasting the links provided in the Appendix into a browser. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Community Board Information 2. Community District Profile and Land Use 3. Overview of Community District 4. Top Three Pressing Issues Overall 5. Summary of Community District Needs and Budget Requests Health Care and Human Services Youth, Education and Child Welfare Public Safety and Emergency Services Core Infrastructure, City Services and Resiliency Land Use, Housing and Economic Development Transportation Parks, Cultural and other Community Facilities 6. Additional Information and Other Budget Requests 7. Summary of Prioritized Budget Requests Table of All Capital Requests Table of All Expense Requests Appendix - Supporting Materials 1. Community Board Information Manhattan Community Board 11 Address: Address:1664 Park Avenue, Phone: Phone:212-831-8929 Email: Email:[email protected] Website: Website:www.cb11m.org Chair: Ms. Diane Collier District Manager: Mr. Angel Mescain Page 1 2. Community District Profile Visit the Community District Profiles to view data, maps, and other resources describing New York City’s 59 Text14community districts at: https://communityprofiles.planning.nyc.gov/ Page 2 2. Community District Land Use Page 3 3. Overview of Community District The Fiscal Year 2019 Statement of District Needs for Community Board 11 is a particularly poignant one. We continue to demand that the city provide essential services and increase the services and resources provided to this community to address what we continue to believe are challenges that this community is particularly threatened by. This neighborhood, in particular, is likely to need and rely on increased city support in this coming year. The tragic effects of Hurricane Maria and the devastation it has imposed on Puerto Rico is expected to produce extensive migration of Puerto Rico residents to New York State and, in particular, the East Harlem community. In addition to all of the existing and longstanding needs of this neighborhood, we urge New York City to dedicate additional resources to prepare and address the needs that this population will require upon joining family, friends and fellow community members in CB11 and elsewhere throughout New York City. The Hurricane Service Center in CB11 (Julia de Burgos), is currently processing seventy-five families per day due to travel restrictions from the island. As travel restrictions are relaxed, we expect this mass migration to increase exponentially. While this may strain city resources, it is an absolute necessity for the city to consider in evaluating how it will deploy its budgetary resources throughout the city. In each instance of this statement, we project a 25 percent increase to the standard unaddressed needs. East Harlem's demographics are shifting, as the White/Non-Hispanic population has increased 172.5 percent from 2000-2010, while the Hispanic population decreased by 8.3 percent and the Black/African American population decreased by 23.6 percent. The Asian population, while still a small percentage of the overall population, increased to over 6,500 or by 322.8 percent from 2000- 2010 (2010 Census Profile). Current residents frequently express concerns about gentrification and the loss of affordable housing, as well as the loss of the local Latino culture. Preservation of existing affordable and public housing, as well as construction of new, deeply affordable housing, including opportunities for affordable homeownership, is incredibly important to ensure that current residents are able to continue to live in East Harlem even as new residents move in. Anti-tenant harassment, code enforcement and rent burden alleviation programs should all be key pieces of the anti-displacement programs that are initiated in East Harlem. Senior citizens, many of whom are on fixed incomes, are especially in need of permanently affordable housing so that they can age in place. Manhattan Community District 11’s economic statistics show a neighborhood in distress. According to the 2011-15 American Community Survey, the annual median household income in East Harlem is $30,973 which is significantly lower than the median NYC household income of $53,373--and less than half of the median household income in Manhattan--$72,871. Of the 98,151 residents age 16 and older in East Harlem, 50.3 percent are either unemployed or not in the labor force. Nearly thirty percent of family incomes in the past 12 months were below the Federal poverty line, the percentages are even higher for youth and seniors (45 and 36 percent respectively); one-third (31 percent) receive food stamps. These statistics show a community that is in need of quality education and local hiring initiatives to increase economic development and employment. Programs to help residents become self-sufficient, rather than dependent on government assistance, will make East Harlem a more prosperous and vibrant community. The City should also focus attention and funding on improving the quality of life in East Harlem. Existing green spaces should be improved and accessible to all. Health programs and initiatives to encourage healthy eating, exercise and balanced mental health should be affordable and available without stigma. Quality schools and early childhood education are keys to lifting young people out of poverty. Affordable and convenient adult education programs are equally important to help adults adapt to changes in industries and job opportunities. Reducing crime, especially around NYCHA developments and other more volatile areas of the district, ensures that residents feel safe to go around the neighborhood. The recent initiatives around 125th Street and Park Avenue to provide outreach services to the homeless, mentally ill and those living with drug
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PERSHING SQUARE VIADUCT (Park Avenue Viaduct), Park Avenue from 40Th Street to Grand Central Terminal (42Nd Street), Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission September 23, 1980, Designation List 137 LP-1127 PERSHING SQUARE VIADUCT (Park Avenue Viaduct), Park Avenue from 40th Street to Grand Central Terminal (42nd Street), Borough of Manhattan. Built 1917-19; architects Warren & Wetmore. Landmark Site: The property bounded by a line running easward parallel with the northern curb line of East 40th Street, a line running northward to the edge of Tax Map Block 1280, Lot 1, parallel with the eastern wall of the viaduct, a line running westward along the edge of Tax Map Block 1280, Lot 1, and a line running southward parallel with the western wall of the viaduct to the point of beginning. On March 11, 1980, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Pershing Square Viaduct (Park Avenue Viaduct) and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 9). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Four witnesses spoke in favor of designation. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS Located at Park Avenue and 42nd Street, tfie Pershing Square Viaduct was constructed tn 1917-1919. The viaduct extends from 40th Street to Grand Central Terminal at 42nd Street, linking upper and lower Park Avenue by way of elevated drives that make a circuit around the terminal building and descend to ground level at 45th Street. Designed in 1912 by the architectural firm of Warren & Wetmore, the viaduct was conceived as part of the original 1903 plan for the station by the firm of Reed & Stem.
    [Show full text]
  • Torchy M-» This National Artists' Performance of Motion in French Theater Or Fro N Mrs
    Curtis Helen Park Ave. Site Own YourHomeExhibition Old New York Conference to Discusa To Be Married Is Chosen for Is Revivified in Emigration to Palegtine Thomas's Revelation to Women at Booth Arrangements for Removal of In St. Hall Play 4,000.000 Jews to Near East Victory TVoubles of House "Not So Proves Will Be Planned Here ffill Bccomc the Bride of Finding and Keeping Disappear Long Ago" Arrangements for the gradual emi¬ Lentilhon at Block Including Pershing While Profiteers and Landlords Are To Be an Engaging Little gration of 4,000.000 Jews to Palestine Joseph Square, Now Owned Forgotten Savecl From Over- will be discussed at an extraordinary Church CeremonyJune5; by Before Varied Displays at Grand Central Palace Play conference of the Zionist Organization to Live in Manila City, Is Decided Upon Sweetness by Its Wit of America here Sunday and Monday. Ouple Association The «onference will be attended hy by Directorsi From the little girl who could not of an THB CAST 1,700 delegates from the United States old-fashioned cottage. 1/ they and Canada. Under the cf be torn'away from the with would be content iri the with a A "uampllRrhtT .John Gray leadership May 20 playhouse country via Moaiar Justice at the United Statei m KnappWeds real stairs and house as simple as the flat came Syl .Marg»r»t Brandeis, HaveCondemnation tiny aleeping porch, to from in the they Mury .I.eatto. Mlllor Supreme Court, and United States Right the buxom mother of four who city they would find it not Rlsln Dovor.Eva Le Gallienne Julian W.
    [Show full text]
  • Landmarks Preservation Commission November 22, 2016, Designation List 490 LP-2579
    Landmarks Preservation Commission November 22, 2016, Designation List 490 LP-2579 YALE CLUB OF NEW YORK CITY 50 Vanderbilt Avenue (aka 49-55 East 44th Street), Manhattan Built 1913-15; architect, James Gamble Rogers Landmark site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1279, Lot 28 On September 13, 2016, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation of the Yale Club of New York City and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site. The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with provisions of law. Six people spoke in support of designation, including representatives of the Yale Club of New York City, Manhattan Borough President Gale A. Brewer, Historic Districts Council, New York Landmarks Conservancy, and the Municipal Art Society of New York. The Real Estate Board of New York submitted written testimony in opposition to designation. State Senator Brad Hoylman submitted written testimony in support of designation. Summary The Yale Club of New York City is a Renaissance Revival-style skyscraper at the northwest corner of Vanderbilt Avenue and East 44th Street. For more than a century it has played an important role in East Midtown, serving the Yale community and providing a handsome and complementary backdrop to Grand Central Terminal. Constructed on property that was once owned by the New York Central Railroad, it stands directly above two levels of train tracks and platforms. This was the ideal location to build the Yale Club, opposite the new terminal, which serves New Haven, where Yale University is located, and at the east end of “clubhouse row.” The architect was James Gamble Rogers, who graduated from Yale College in 1889 and attended the Ecole des Beaux Arts in Paris during the 1890s.
    [Show full text]
  • Turtle Bay Garment District Times Square Murray Hill Tudor City
    Neighborhood Map ¯ M57 W 55 Street W 55 Street E 55 Street E 55 Street E 55 Street 57 St-7 Av LOVE sculpture Central Synagogue 411 701 410 700 540 545 655 856 998 909 900 1001 1034 1345 1035 6 Avenue 6 1 Avenue 1 2 Avenue 2 5 Avenue 5 3 Avenue 3 201 Avenue 7 199 99 1 1 29 31 99 101 141 Park Avenue Park 139 301 399 401 Madison Avenue Madison W 54 Street W 54 Street E 54 Street E 54 Street Av Lexington E 54 Street St. Peter’s Church Recreation Lipstick M5 Lever Center 54 M7 LTD House Building M20 Museum of Paley 616 683 527 520 829 399 975 976 M104 Modern Art Park 1009 M5 St. Thomas Lexington Av- 6 ½ Avenue ½ 6 M7 (MoMA) 201 7 Av Episcopal Church 53 St 101 1 29 101 133 299 301 399 401 Citicorp Center W 53 Street E 53 Street E 53 Street 875 3 Avenue 5 Av-53 St Manhattan Park Avenue Waterfront CBS Plaza Seagram Greenway 801 370 500 509 663 992 866 989 666 600 1301 Building Austrian Building Paley Center Cultural Forum for Media 201 199 1 1 37 39 99 199 297 299 395 397 M1 W 52 Street W 52 Street LTD E 52 Street E 52 Street E 52 Street M2 M1 LTD LTD e M101 M4 M2 u LTD LTD LTD M15 M5 Olympic Tower n M101 M4 SBS M15 e LTD LTD LTD v M101 Greenacre SBS 345 591 982 850 488 939 350 787 790 1285 M102 1290 A M103 Park M15 M1 M101 M1 k M102 M15 r 6 ½ Avenue ½ 6 M2 1 Avenue 2 Avenue 2 3 Avenue 3 5 Avenue 7 Avenue 7 6 Avenue 6 M2 51 St M103 M3 a 1 1 27 M3 201 199 M4 99 P 137 199 299 301 399 401 M5 M4 Madison Avenue Madison Q32 W 51 Street W 51 Street Q32 E 51 Street E 51 Street E 51 Street To Concourse Paramount Plaza St.
    [Show full text]
  • BQE in Context: Report from AIANY BQE Task Force | July 2019 1 BQE in Context: Report from AIANY BQE Task Force
    BQE in Context: Report from AIANY BQE Task Force | July 2019 1 BQE in Context: Report from AIANY BQE Task Force Introduction................................................................................................................................... 2 Background of BQE Project....................................................................................................... 3 AIANY Workshop I – BQE Planning Goals............................................................................ 4 AIANY Workshop II – Evaluation of BQE Options............................................................... 5 Workshop Takeaways.................................................................................................................. 6 Appendix: AIANY Workshop II Summaries Sub-group A: Atlantic Avenue / Carroll Gardens / Cobble Hill................................ 10 Sub-group B: Brooklyn Heights / Promenade.............................................................. 15 Sub-group C: DUMBO / Bridge Ramps......................................................................... 17 Sub-group D: Larger City / Region / BQE Corridor................................................... 19 BQE Report Credits...................................................................................................................... 26 Early in 2019, members of the American Institute of Architects New York Chapter's (AIANY) Planning & Urban Design and Transportation & Infrastructure committees formed an ad hoc task force to examine issues and opportunities
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration Record of Decision for the East Side Access Project
    Federal Railroad Administration Record of Decision For the East Side Access Project September 2012 SUMMARY OF DECISION This is a Record of Decision (ROD) of the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), an operating administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation, regarding the East Side Access (ESA) Project. FRA has prepared this ROD in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA, and FRA’s Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) filed an application with the FRA for a loan to finance eligible elements of the ESA Project through the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) Program. The ESA Project is the MTA’s largest system expansion in over 100 years. The ESA Project will expand the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) services by connecting Queens and Long Island with East Midtown Manhattan. With direct LIRR service to Midtown East, the LIRR will further increase its market share of commuters by saving up to 40 minutes per day in subway/bus/sidewalk travel time for commuters who work on Manhattan’s East Side. The ESA Project was previously considered in an environmental impact statement (EIS) prepared by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in May 2001 and subsequent FTA reevaluations and an environmental assessment of changes in the ESA Project. Construction of the ESA Project has been ongoing since 2001. FRA has reviewed the environmental impacts for the ESA Project identified in the FTA March 2001 Final EIS, subsequent FTA Reevaluations, and the 2006 Supplemental EA/FONSI (collectively, the “2001 EIS”) for the ESA Project and adopted it pursuant to CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1506.3).
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Grand Central Terminal Event Production Manual
    GRAND CENTRAL TERMINAL PRODUCTION MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE/S Working in a Landmark 2 Definitions 3 Key Locations 3 Public & Construction Safety 4 - 5 Safe Work Plan 5 - 6 Prohibited Items 7 Fire and Life Safety 8 - 10 Taxi Stand Events 11 Event Security 12 - 13 MTAPD 13 Load In/Out 13 - 15 Street Activity Permits 16 Floor Plan/Structural Review 17 - 19 Production Schedule/Vendor Lists 20 MNR Support Services 21 - 24 Housekeeping 25 Catering 26 - 27 Media, Promotional Signage & Sound 28 - 29 Other Event Services 30 Vehicle Display Policy 31 - 32 Event Insurance 33 - 34 Submittal Deadlines (Exhibit B) 35 - 36 Event Fees (Exhibit C) 37 - 39 1 WORKING IN A LANDMARK BUILDING Built in 1913, Grand Central Terminal is an active transportation hub, National Historic Landmark, and a public space. Vanderbilt Hall is one of Grand Central’s designated public event spaces and once the Terminal’s main waiting room. The Hall is filled with numerous architectural details that highlight the beauty of the Beaux Arts movement, such as the marble doorways, large chandeliers, and original benches. Therefore, to protect and preserve the historical and architectural details of Vanderbilt Hall and to maintain the historic atmosphere of Grand Central, please adhere to the following rules and regulations in this manual, which are designed not only to protect the building and the safety of its visitors and staff, but also to ensure that building operations are not compromised. The walls, floors, chandeliers and fixtures are all original and therefore must be protected at all times. For this reason, the following rules apply to all events: Floor: .
    [Show full text]
  • F. Vehicular Traffic
    Chapter 9: Transportation (Vehicular Traffic) F. VEHICULAR TRAFFIC EXISTING CONDITIONS STREET AND ROADWAY NETWORK Traffic conditions in the study area vary in relation to a number of factors—the nature of the street and roadway network, surrounding land uses and the presence of major traffic generators, and the intensity of interaction between autos, taxis, trucks, buses, deliveries, and pedestrians. The study area contains five subareas, or zones—Lower Manhattan, the Lower East Side, East Midtown, the Upper East Side, and East Harlem—and each has different street and roadway characteristics along its length. East Midtown, the Upper East Side, and East Harlem are characterized by a regular street grid, with avenues running north-south and streets running east- west. Each of the major north-south avenues—First, Second, Third, Lexington, Park, Madison, and Fifth Avenues—are major traffic carriers. There is just one limited-access roadway, the FDR Drive, which extends around the eastern edge of the study area from its northern end to its southern end. A general overview of the character of the street and roadway network in each of the five zones is presented below. Lower Manhattan is characterized by an irregular grid pattern south of Canal Street. Except for a few major arterials, most streets within the area are narrow with usually just one "moving" lane. Travel is time-consuming and slow along them. Pedestrian traffic often overflows into the street space, further impeding vehicular traffic flow. Water Street and Broadway are the two key north-south streets in this area, and carry two or more effective travel lanes, yet are often difficult to negotiate due to frequent double-parked truck traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Gang Wars Background Guide.Pdf
    Chair’s Letter Dear Delegates, We are delighted to welcome you to the Gang Wars Crisis Committee as part of the third Kent School Model United Nations Conference. Your chair for the committee is Brandon Schuster ‘19; he have been part of KSMUN for the past three years. Brandon has chaired the EU Committee on Migration (KSMUN ‘17) and the Cuban Missile Crisis (‘18) in the past two years and is now the Under Secretary-General for Logistics. He also runs cross country, is a coxswain for the crew team, and is co-president of Grilling Club. I am so excited to have you in my committee! Our committee deals with the Apalachin meeting of 1957, where the five main bosses of the New York crime scene gathered in upstate New York to discuss their futures. After decades of a stable conservative majority in The Commission, the structure of organization for America’s mafia, the 1950s have brought about a new liberal movement. At this meeting, some expect to be elected the new Chairman of the Commission, some are pushing for liberal reforms, and some are trying to cling on to power. Your goal will be to gain power and influence, represent your delegate and family’s views, and to eventually choose a new leader of the Commission. All are welcome in to join in this committee, but a basic knowledge of the workings of MUN procedure, the history of the American mafia, and the position of your delegate you represent will aid you in preparation for the committee. All delegates are expected to research these things and come ready with the information that they will need, as electronic devices will not be allowed in the debate room.
    [Show full text]
  • Restaurant Offers
    RESTAURANT OFFERS 117 W. 58th Street (between 6th and 7th Avenues) Offer arranged at Concierge desk Or in person (credential required) www.ninostuscany.com (212) 757-8630 50% off menu for players 25% off menu for all other credential holders This Upper Midtown gem is another winner for restaurateur Nino Selimaj. Featuring the hospitality and class that patrons have come to expect from Nino, Nino’s Tuscany is an excellent choice for all diners. Featuring a Tuscan inspired menu of Italian classics, along with many fine dishes featuring wild game, Nino’s Tuscany is a unique and high end option in the Italian dining scene. 235 Park Avenue S. (at 19th Street) Offer arranged at Concierge desk Or in person (credential required) www.citycrabnyc.com (212) 529-3800 25% off menu City Crab, proudly serving New York City’s freshest seafood since 1993. The East River at 30th Street Offer arranged at Concierge desk Or in person (credential required) www.thewaterclub.com (212) 683-3333 25% off menu The Water Club serves classic American cuisine in an elegant setting with sweeping river views. Enjoy refreshing cocktails and light bites upstairs at the rooftop tiki bar, The Crow's Nest. Located on the East River between 28th and 32nd Street in New York City. 90 East 42nd Street Offer arranged at Concierge desk Or in person (credential required) www.pershingsquare.com (212) 286-9600 25% off menu Pershing Square offers casual American cuisine in a bustling classic bistro environment. Conveniently located on 42nd Street directly across from New York's famous Grand Central Terminal’s main entrance and underneath the Park Avenue Viaduct.
    [Show full text]
  • 71-105 East 42Nd Street – Grand Central Terminal, Borough of Manhattan
    February 23, 2021 Name of Landmark Building Type of Presentation Month xx, year Public Hearing The current proposal is: Preservation Department – Items 7 & 8, LPC-21-05602/21-05603 71-105 East 42nd Street – Grand Central Terminal, Borough of Manhattan How to Testify Via Zoom: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/85652843873?pwd=aHV2VWhNdkc1SDFLeitDbE9YN3NnUT09 Note: If you want to testify on an item, join the Webinar ID: 856 5284 3873 Zoom webinar at the agenda’s “Be Here by” Passcode: 646895 time (about an hour in advance). When the By Phone: Chair indicates it’s time to testify, “raise your 1 646-558-8656 hand” via the Zoom app if you want to speak US (New York) 877-853-5257 (Toll free) (*9 on the phone). Those who signed up in advance will be called first. US 888 475 4499 (Toll free) 175 PARK AVENUE LPC APPLICATION LANDMARKS FEBRUARY 23, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT OVERVIEW PART I HARMONIOUS RELATIONSHIP TO GRAND CENTRAL TERMINAL PART II IMPROVEMENTS AT GRAND CENTRAL TERMINAL (LOT 1) VIADUCT-LEVEL SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT CHANGES TO 42ND STREET PASSAGE COPYRIGHTED 2020 © SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Project Overview DEVELOPMENT SITE 394.33' LEXINGTON AVE LEXINGTON 75.00' 200.00' 45.00' LOT 54 LOT 154 42ND ST 340.33' LOT 1 DEVELOPMENT SITE GRAND CENTRAL 208.33' LOT 30 TERMINAL 60' WIDE STREET 80' WIDE STREET VANDERBILT AVENUE VANDERBILT AVENUE LEXINGTON GRAND HYATT HOTEL 42ND STREET 100' WIDE STREET FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSE ONLY 4 175 PARK AVENUE IT IS MUTUALLY UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PRELIMINARY IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO FURTHER REVIEW AND VERIFICATION BY THE FEBRUARY 23, 2021 CLIENT’S LAND USE COUNSEL, ACCORDINGLY, AND TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL LLP AND ITS PARTNERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND CONSULTANTS SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY IN CONNECTION WITH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED HEREIN.
    [Show full text]
  • Mob Rule Vs. Progressive Reform
    Bard College Bard Digital Commons Senior Projects Spring 2016 Bard Undergraduate Senior Projects Spring 2016 Mob Rule vs. Progressive Reform Ethan Moon Barness Bard College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2016 Part of the Political History Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Barness, Ethan Moon, "Mob Rule vs. Progressive Reform" (2016). Senior Projects Spring 2016. 185. https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/senproj_s2016/185 This Open Access work is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been provided to you by Bard College's Stevenson Library with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this work in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights- holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Mob Rule vs. Progressive Reform The struggle between organized crime, machine politics and the Progressive Reform Movement for control over New York City municipal politics from 1900­1935 Senior Project submitted to The Division of Social Studies Bard College by Ethan Barness 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my Project Advisor Myra Armstead for guiding me through the research process in my senior year at Bard. I would like to thank my mother, my father and my sister as well as all my closest friends and relatives, whose support I greatly appreciate.
    [Show full text]