DOCSLIB.ORG

Home Editorial Authors' Responses Guidelines For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Home Editorial Authors' Responses Guidelines For Home Search Every Field Editorial Search Authors' Landor's Cleanness Responses By Adam Roberts (Oxford, 2014) 208 pp. Guidelines Reviewed by David Chandler on 2015-05-21. For Click here for a PDF version. Reviewers Click here to buy the book on Amazon. About Us Masthead Between 1927 and 1936, Chapman and Hall of London brought out the sixteen volumes of Walter Savage Landor's complete (well, more or less complete) prose and poetry in English as edited by T. Earle Welby and Stephen Wheeler Feedback respectively. As collected editions go, it is not very impressive, yet it remains a remarkable monument both to Landor's immense achievement and the critical recognition of that achievement in days gone by. In 1933, for example, T. S. Eliot acknowledged Landor as "one of the very finest poets of the first part of the nineteenth century" (The Use of Poetry and the Use of Criticism, 79). But changing critical tastes have not been kind to him. Little new work has been done on Landor since the 1960s, and it is easy to find (though not excuse) graduate students specializing in Romanticism who have never even heard of him. Neither female nor gay nor plebian, not a dedicated poet like Wordsworth or Keats, not a dedicated philosopher like Coleridge, not a crowd-pleaser and molder of national ideology like Walter Scott, not a dandy and self- conscious celebrity like Byron, not a great essayist like Lamb or Hazlitt, not a good example of "the Romantic ideology," indeed not a typical Romantic nor yet a typical Victorian, but with a career straddling those standard periods, Landor has somehow fallen between all the critical stools that might have arrested his fall into comparative obscurity. Despite the critical neglect, it is hardly possible to open a random volume and random page of the Welby-Wheeler edition without being impressed by what one reads. There is a loftiness about Landor's writing, a magisterial sense of style, which can hardly be mistaken for any other author's. Though the style often distracts the reader from the content, Landor was a highly cultured, deeply read man whose writing is often interesting and sometimes profound. Any new study of him is very welcome, especially if it is likely to rehabilitate him, to stimulate people to read and study him, and in many ways this book comes across as just what is wanted. The publisher's blurb on the back cover states: The present study, the first for nearly half a century to address the whole of Landor's prodigious output over the seven decades of his writing life, in verse, prose, and drama, in English and Latin: from the brief lyrics by which (if at all) he is remembered today up to his idylls, tragedies, and epics; from his pamphlets and essays to historical novels like Pericles and Aspasia and the textual colossus of the Imaginary Conversations. Besides being an incomplete sentence (a point to which I shall return), this blurb makes the book sound grander than it actually is. Rather than "address[ing] the whole of Landor's prodigious output," this slim volume samples it. "[T]he textual colossus of the Imaginary Conversations," for example, is covered in a chapter of some thirty pages. Yet if Roberts has understandably chosen texts that best illustrate his central thesis, and on which he has clever things to say, his sampling is nonetheless intelligent and effective, giving a rounded view of Landor's achievement. Demonstrating Roberts's profound knowledge of his author, the book leaves us actually wishing that it were longer and that it covered more of Landor's writings. But perhaps, I hope, the sense that there is much more to be said will encourage other scholars to start saying it. Previous attempts to work up interest in Landor have tended to begin with a roll call of literary worthies who have acclaimed him in the past. Instead of doing this, or even paying much attention to earlier Landor criticism, Roberts launches his main thesis immediately and pursues it vigorously, and with little digression, through the course of his book. Landor's "classicism," Roberts argues, his constant pursuit of a timeless, noble style (he found it as easy to write in Latin as English), is bound up in complex ways with an ideology of cleanliness, of purity, that has all sorts of cultural, moral and political ramifications. At the same time, though, Landor's longing for the "clean" involves him in a constant struggle with what may loosely be called "dirt," and besides dirtying him, this struggle with dirt becomes a constituent part of his style and what might loosely be termed his "philosophy." In Roberts's reading, Landor couldn't just wish the dirt away, at least not without loss: at some level, Roberts contends, Landor recognized that "perfect purity is also a kind of death -- or to put it another way, that perfect purity is perfect loss; that desire is always a contaminated and self-contradictory [sic]" (7). Landor's texts are thus haunted by "dirt" that is both substantive and stylistic: with the specters of sex, violence and unruliness hovering around them, and with obscure, macaronic and heteroglossic language constantly threatening to obtrude. This masterful thesis not only reveals a great deal about Landor but also makes him extremely interesting. Indeed, Roberts argues in his epilogue that his approach makes Landor exemplarily Romantic, for the kind of dirt he grapples with also permeates Romanticism more widely. It is a well-earned conclusion. In general, Roberts comes across as a persuasive advocate for Landor. "At length and over time," Roberts states, he has found "that even the least promising of . [Landor's] works yields a variety of fascinating, even thrilling qualia under scrutiny" (9). This is well supported by many of Roberts's readings. As though to stress his impartiality, however, he comes down pretty hard on a few of Landor's writings, especially Andrea of Hungary (1839), which he considers the author's "worst" play (124), and the Citation and Examination of William Shakespeare (1834), which he curiously names a novel, "as it must be called" (144). But it is not a novel. Masquerading as a legal deposition taken at Shakespeare's trial for deer poaching on 19 September 1582 by one Ephraim Barnett, and presented complete with an "Editor's Preface" and mock- scholarly notes, it is primarily a spoof aimed at Shakespearean scholars. Its satirical thrust is not mentioned and I fear not recognized by Roberts, who refers to neither Ephraim Barnett nor the anonymous editor, and who leaves us to conclude that Landor seriously freighted this dullest of novels with a great many pedantic footnotes to his own poor jokes. The odd thing about this notion is that the Citation is singularly occupied with dirtying, for by representing the young Shakespeare as the irreverent and promiscuous poacher of Warwickshire folklore (Landor himself was a native of Warwickshire), it seeks to explode the pure, saintly, and conformist image of the Bard found in nineteenth-century biographies. It is worth pursuing this point a little further, for Roberts makes very heavy weather of the rather good jokes in the Citation by attempting to force them into his argument. At one point in Landor's text, for example, a witness against Shakespeare named Joseph Carnaby says, "We were still at some distance from the party, when of a sudden Euseby hung an --," whereupon Carnaby is reprimanded by Sir Thomas Lucy, Shakespeare's legendary prosecutor, for using "such rude phrases" (Complete Works 10: 283-84). The humor here is obviously akin to that delightful moment in The Lion King when Pumbaa is told not to say the word "farted" "in front of the kids" even though most of the "kids" in the audience are expected to know he was about to say it. But could Landor expect his readers to know the old expression "hung an arse"? Since he was evidently not sure, he introduced a second joke by adding-- in a footnote -- that the omitted word was "unintelligible" though "[t]hat it was rough and outlandish is apparent from the reprimand of Sir Thomas." Thus, to gently satirize the culture that had made Thomas Bowdler's Family Shakespeare a bestseller, Landor mimics the sort of prudish scholar who had taken exception to the traditional stories about Shakespeare. Not recognizing the satire, Roberts comments, with some exasperation: Landor can't help trampling all over his own joke, although here the motive is presumably one of propriety. The omitted word is, of course, 'arse' ('to hang an arse', 'to hesitate or hold back, to be reluctant or tardy; to hang back' [OED]; though it would require an improbably sheltered upbringing in 1834, never mind 1582, to find the word arse 'unintelligible'. (146) Well! Understanding the word "arse" and knowing Carnaby was about to say it are obviously different things, just as understanding the word "farted" and knowing Pumbaa was about to say it are different things; and the joke requires that the word be withheld. Roberts's "of course" is singularly unconvincing, even to himself, for he seems to need the authority of the OED. But this is where his failure to understand and explain the genre of the Citation is critical. Roberts would have it that Landor couldn't write the word "arse" in a "novel" because of his sense of "propriety," even though his subversive attraction to dirt led him to awkwardly ghost it in before, as one might say, "covering it." Yet the point of the joke, in so far as it has one, is that the values of the sanctimonious Sir Thomas Lucy, Shakespeare's enemy, have been institutionalized in modern Britain, not least by Shakespeare scholars.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Handbook for Visitors to Stratford-Upon-Avon PDF Book
    HANDBOOK FOR VISITORS TO STRATFORD-UPON- AVON PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Edward Adams | 54 pages | 01 Jan 2010 | Nabu Press | 9781141786749 | English | Charleston SC, United States Handbook for Visitors to Stratford-Upon-Avon PDF Book The old town of Stratford is synonymous in the minds of most travellers with the name of its most famous citizen, playwright William Shakespeare. Your online school trip organiser - My Tour Manager. Exhibitions programme. Stratford-upon-Avon is usually shortened to Stratford but when buying tickets and checking train times the full name avoids confusion with Stratford station in London. With a keen interest in History — and a BA degree to match — Margaret prides herself on her knowledge of the amazing city she calls home and she's been guiding here now for nearly a decade. No one is more than 50 feet from the action! Each workshop is led by RSC Education Associate Practitioners all of whom have first-hand experience of RSC rehearsal room practice, working either as actors, directors or theatre education specialists. Shakespeare was born in this lovely half-timbered house in , his descendants continuing to live here until the 19th century. View my complete profile. A joint entry ticket is thus available for all 5 properties, which comprise:. Buses also operate from Warwick. Side 14 - On the upper border of the plinth are these words— " Take him for all in all We shall not look upon his like again," On the plinth is the following inscription— " The corporation and inhabitants of Stratford, assisted by the munificent contributions of the nobility and gentlemen of the neighbourhood, rebuilt this edifice in the year His wife was the daughter of one Hathaway, said to have been a substantial yeoman in the neighbourhood of Stratford.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Ill Kill'd” Deer: Poaching and Social Order in the Merry Wives of Windsor
    The “ill kill’d” Deer: Poaching and Social Order in The Merry Wives of Windsor Jeffrey Theis Nicholas Rowe once asserted that the young Shakespeare was caught stealing a deer from Sir Thomas Lucy’s park at Charlecote. The anecdote’s truth-value is clearly false, yet the narrative’s plausibility resonates from the local social customs in Shakespeare’s Warwickshire region. As the social historian Roger Manning convincingly argues, hunting and its ille- gitimate kin poaching thoroughly pervaded all social strata of early modern English culture. Close proximity to the Forest of Arden and nu- merous aristocratic deer parks and rabbit warrens would have steeped Shakespeare’s early life in the practices of hunting and poaching whether he engaged in them or only heard stories about them.1 While some Shakespeare criticism attends directly or indirectly to the importance of hunting in the comedies, remarkably, there has been no sustained analysis of poaching’s importance in these plays.2 In part, the reason for the oversight might be lexicographical. The word “poaching” never occurs in any of Shakespeare’s works, and the first instance in which poaching means “to take game or fish illegally” is in 1611—a decade after Shakespeare composed his comedies.3 Yet while the word was not coined for another few years, Roger Manning proves that illegal deer killing was a socially and politically explosive issue well before 1611. Thus, the “ill kill’d deer” Justice Shallow refers to in Act One of The Merry Wives of Windsor situates the play within a socially resonant discourse where illegal deer killing brings to light cultural assumptions imbedded within the legal hunt.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Hull the Early Career of Thomas
    THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL THE EARLY CAREER OF THOMAS, LORD HOWARD, EARL OF SURREY AND THIRD DUKE OF NORFOLK, 1474—c. 1525 being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Hull by Susan Elisabeth Vokes, B.A. September, 1988 Acknowledgements I should like to thank the University of Hull for my postgraduate scholarship, and the Institute of Historical Research and Eliot College, the Universiy of Kent, for providing excellent facilities in recent years. I am especially grateful to the Duke of Norfolk and his archivists for giving me access to material in his possession. The staff of many other archives and libraries have been extremely helpful in answering detailed enquiries and helping me to locate documents, and / regret that it is not possible to acknowledge them individually. I am grateful to my supervisor, Peter Heath, for his patience, understanding and willingness to read endless drafts over the years in which this study has evolved. Others, too, have contributed much. Members of the Russell/Starkey seminar group at the Institute of Historical Research, and the Late Medieval seminar group at the University of Kent made helpful comments on a paper, and I have benefitted from suggestions, discussion, references and encouragement from many others, particularly: Neil Samman, Maria Dowling, Peter Gwynn, George Bernard, Greg Walker and Diarmaid MacCulloch. I am particularly grateful to several people who took the trouble to read and comment on drafts of various chapters. Margaret Condon and Anne Crawford commented on a draft of the first chapter, Carole Rawcliffe and Linda Clerk on my analysis of Norfolk's estate accounts, Steven Ellis on my chapters on Surrey in Ireland and in the north of England, and Roger Virgoe on much of the thesis, including all the East Anglian material.
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare Among Schoolchildren: Approaches for the Secondary Classroom
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 345 285 CS 213 352 AUTHOR Rygiel, Mary Ann TITLE Shakespeare among Schoolchildren: Approaches for the Secondary Classroom. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, REPORT NO ISBN-0-8141-4381-4 PUB DATE 92 NOTE 147p. AVAILABLE FROM National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 Kenyon Rd., Urbana, IL 61801 (Stock No. 43814-0015; $8.95 members, $11.95 nonmembers). PUB TYPE Guides - Classroom Use - Teaching Guides (For Teacher) (052) EDRE PRICE MF01/PC06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Class Activities; Drama; *English Instruction; English Literature; High Schools; *Literature Appreciation; Renaissance Literature IDENTIFIERS Historical Background; Response to Literature; *Shakespeare (William) ABSTRACT Making connections for teachers between Shakespeare and his historical context on the one hand and secondary studentson the other, this book presents background information, commentary, resources, and classroom ideas to enliven students' encounters with Shakespeare. The book concentrates on "Romeo and Juliet," "Julius Caesar," "Macbeth," and "Hamlet." Each of the book's chapters includes classroom activities that focus students' attention on their own responses to Shakespeare. Following an introductory first chapter, the book presents an overview of ways in which literary scholars and critics have approached Shakespeare and th*.m looks at Ehakespeare's language and examines how to help novices understand why it is so different from modern speech. The boWc situates Shakespeare in his speech and writing community, discussing books and education in late medieval and Tudor times, and explores what is known and can be inferred about Shakespeare's life. The book then focuses on his plots, which can seem preposterous to modernstudents, and the dramatic conventions and historical realitson which they hinge.
    [Show full text]
  • Preface Historians Have Found That As Many As One in Every Six British Country Houses Is Connected to the History of Empire.1 Ch
    Preface Historians have found that as many as one in every six British country houses is connected to the history of empire.1 Charlecote Park in Warwickshire is no exception. Ten children from Colmore Primary in Birmingham explored this National Trust house with volunteer guide and researcher Ruth Longoni and the writer Sarala Estruch. The children found three items of particular interest. The first is a painting of a black page boy wearing a metal collar standing beside Captain Thomas Lucy, by the artist Sir Godfrey Kneller in 1680. We have not yet identified the child, and do not know how he arrived at Charlecote. Captain Thomas Lucy had links with Africa where he was Captain General of HM Forces in Africa and Governor of the garrison and city of Tangier. (See Black People in Warwickshire’s Past, published by the Educational Development Service, Leamington, 1994, p.20) There were black slaves attached to Warwickshire families at the time and there is evidence of a slave sale in Lichfield in 1771. A contemporary letter also shows that the wife of Thomas Lucy ‘had her own…black page to hand her morning chocolate’. This may be the boy in the painting, but we do not know for sure.2 The second item is a sword, which was stolen at the time of the Indian Mutiny, or First War of Indian Independence (1857). Below is an account of five pearls, stolen from Lucknow, the site of anti-colonial struggle and the former home city of one of the ten Colmore children, Xazq.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Archives Prob 11/110/418 1 ______
    THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES PROB 11/110/418 1 ________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY: The document below is the Prerogative Court of Canterbury copy of the will, dated 11 September 1606 and proved 20 November 1607, of Alice (nee Hodgkins) Hoby (d.1607?), sister-in-law of Sir Thomas Hoby (1530-1566), first husband of Lady Burghley’s sister, Elizabeth Cooke (1528-1609), later Lady Russell, who signed the petition against James Burbage’s Blackfriars theatre. See Laoutaris, Chris, Shakespeare and the Countess: The Battle That Gave Birth to the Globe, (London: Fig Tree, 2014), pp. 121, 123, 130, 176-7, 277-8. The testatrix’ daughter-in-law, Katherine Fermor, was the great-niece of Anne Fermor (d.1550), who married Sir William Lucy (d.1551) and was the mother of Sir Thomas Lucy (1532?-1600) of Charlecote, who allegedly prosecuted William Shakespeare of Stratford upon Avon for stealing deer from his park. The testatrix’ daughter-in-law, Katherine Fermor, was also the great-niece of Mary Fermor (d.1573), the first wife of Sir Richard Knightley (1533-1615), prosecuted for his part in the publication of the Marprelate tracts. The testatrix’ daughter-in-law, Mary (nee Tracy) Hoby Vere (18 May 1581 - 25 December 1671), married, as her second husband, Oxford’s first cousin, Horatio Vere (1565-1635), Baron Vere of Tilbury. The testatrix’ executor, Sir Paul Tracy, was the son of Richard Tracy (d. 8 March 1568) and Barbara Lucy, the aunt of Sir Thomas Lucy (1532?-1600) of Charlecote, who allegedly prosecuted William Shakespeare of Stratford upon Avon for stealing deer.
    [Show full text]
  • English Aristocratic Women and the Fabric of Piety, 1450-1550 Gendering the Late Medieval and Early Modern World
    GENDERING THE LATE MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN WORLD Harris and the Fabric of 1450-1550 and Piety, the Fabric English Aristocratic Women Barbara J. Harris English Aristocratic Women and the Fabric of Piety, 1450-1550 English Aristocratic Women and the Fabric of Piety, 1450-1550 Gendering the Late Medieval and Early Modern World Series editors: James Daybell (Chair), Victoria E. Burke, Svante Norrhem, and Merry Wiesner-Hanks This series provides a forum for studies that investigate women, gender, and/ or sexuality in the late medieval and early modern world. The editors invite proposals for book-length studies of an interdisciplinary nature, including, but not exclusively, from the fields of history, literature, art and architectural history, and visual and material culture. Consideration will be given to both monographs and collections of essays. Chronologically, we welcome studies that look at the period between 1400 and 1700, with a focus on any part of the world, as well as comparative and global works. We invite proposals including, but not limited to, the following broad themes: methodologies, theories and meanings of gender; gender, power and political culture; monarchs, courts and power; constructions of femininity and masculinity; gift-giving, diplomacy and the politics of exchange; gender and the politics of early modern archives; gender and architectural spaces (courts, salons, household); consumption and material culture; objects and gendered power; women’s writing; gendered patronage and power; gendered activities, behaviours, rituals and fashions. Books in the series: Gendered Temporalities in the Early Modern World English Aristocratic Women’s Religious Patronage, 1450-1550: The Fabric of Piety Chivalry, Reading, and Women’s Culture in Early Modern Spain: From Amadís de Gaula to Don Quixote English Aristocratic Women and the Fabric of Piety, 1450-1550 English Aristocratic Women and the Fabric of Piety, 1450-1550 Barbara J.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 131 (July 2005
    The Charles Lamb Bulletin The Journal of the Charles Lamb Society July 2005 New Series No. 131 Contents Articles DAVID FAIRER: Happy Returns? Lamb, Gray, and Wordsworth’s Ruined Cottage 62 DAVID CHANDLER: Lamb, Falstaff’s Letters, and Landor’s Citation and Examination of William Shakspeare 76 Reviews D.E. WICKHAM on The Devil Kissed Her: The Story of Mary Lamb by Kathy Watson 86 Society Notes and News from Members 89 62 Happy Returns? Lamb, Gray, and Wordsworth’s Ruined Cottage By DAVID FAIRER This talk was given at the Society’s annual lunch on 19 February 2005. ‘MANY HAPPY RETURNS!’, WE SAY—almost without thinking. But of course we sense that a birthday, our personal anniversary, does involve a return, a looping back to revisit (wherever we are physically) some spot where we feel at home, a mental space where we keep stock of ourselves, and to which we hope for happy returns. The old Elizabethan word for anniversary, a ‘year’s mind’, catches well that mental revisiting which shades into our specific modern idea of commemoration, a mind being formerly an act of memory or recollection. Well today, though not the actual date, is very much the year’s mind of Charles Lamb. It is the day we have him in our minds. He comes into our thoughts often, but today, here, now, he is in all our minds, and through him we are brought together. The Society has its own regular happy returns to this occasion, a day for meeting old friends and making new ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Portraits and the Construction of Identity Within Early Modern Families
    FACING THE FAMILY : GROUP PORTRAITS AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF IDENTITY WITHIN EARLY MODERN FAMILIES by ROSEMARY ISABEL KEEP A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Reformation and Early Modern Studies School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham August 30th 2017 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis draws together material and archival sources to investigate the long-overlooked portraits of English provincial gentry families commissioned between c.1550 and c.1680. Specifically, its focus is on portraits of family groups where more than one generation, connected through blood or kinship, is depicted in the same composition. The thesis identifies these as a coherent genre for the first time and examines the ways in which the gentry used such paintings to establish familial legacy and heritage for future generations. This thesis explains how these portraits respond to, and reflect, family memory and narratives, social networks, local histories, religious observance and artistic developments. They are important because the family, as the basic unit of society, was essential for the formation and transmission of belief and identity, and the place where children were socialised.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholicism, Protestantism and Secularism in Shakespeare and English/American Literary Culture * on “Catholic,” See 1838
    1 Catholicism, Protestantism and Secularism in Shakespeare and English/American Literary Culture * On “Catholic,” see 1838. ** On “Protestant,” see 1529. On “Puritan,” see 1573 Including American Contexts Continental Contexts Irish Contexts @=confirmed by 2 sources Home Page: Shakespeare and Religion Chronology by Dennis Taylor, Boston College Notes in process, Revised March, 2013 **40?** By tradition, Joseph of Arimathea led Christian hermits to found abbey at Glastonbury, at foot of Tor hill in Somersetshire. English Protestant historians (i.e. Camden in Remains (“The true Christian Religion was planted heere most auntiently by Joseph of Arimathia … yea by Saint Peter and Saint Paul …”); Foxe in Acts (“All this while about the space of foure hundred yeares, Religion remayned in Britayne uncorrupt … till about the comming of Austen and of hys companions from Rome, many of the sayd Britayne preachers were slayn by the Saxons”); Harrison in Holinshed (Description of Britaine, prefixed to Holinshed’s Chronicles): how Philip the Apostle sent Joseph of Arimathea to the Britons … [then Augustine and his monks] drowned altogether in the pits of error digged up by Antichrist”); argued that Joseph founded a true Christianity, established as the national religion by Lucius in 177; to be corrupted by the arrival of Augustine and his monks (see 597). [but see 314 AD in answer to this myth] See Spenser, FQ 2.10.53: … and after him good Lucius, That first received Christianitie, The sacred pledge of Christes Evangely; Yet true it is, that long before that day Hither came Joseph of Arimathy, Who brought with him the holy grayle, (they say) And preacht the truth, but since it greatly did decay.
    [Show full text]
  • English Book Owners in the Seventeenth Century a Work in Progress Listing
    English book owners in the seventeenth century A work in progress listing How much do we really know about patterns and impacts of book ownership in Britain in the seventeenth century? How well equipped are we to answer questions such as the following?: • What was a typical private library, in terms of size and content, in the seventeenth century? • How does the answer to that question vary according to occupation, social status, etc? • How does the answer vary over time? – how different are ownership patterns in the middle of the century from those of the beginning, and how different are they again at the end? Having sound answers to these questions will contribute significantly to our understanding of print culture and the history of the book more widely during this period. Our current state of knowledge is both imperfect, and fragmented. There is no directory or comprehensive reference source on seventeenth-century British book owners, although there are numerous studies of individual collectors. There are well-known names who are regularly cited in this context – Cotton, Dering, Pepys – and accepted wisdom as to collections which were particularly interesting or outstanding, but there is much in this area that deserves to be challenged. Private Libraries in Renaissance England and Books in Cambridge Inventories have developed a more comprehensive approach to a particular (academic) kind of owner, but they are largely focused on the sixteenth century. Sears Jayne, Library Catalogues of the English Renaissance , extends coverage to 1640, based on book lists found in a variety of manuscript sources. The Cambridge History of Libraries in Britain and Ireland (2006) contains much relevant information in this field, summarising existing scholarship, and references to this have been included in individual entries below where appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Wrote Shakespeare? (Illustrated.) the Shakespeare Family
    XLbc ©pen Court A MONTHLY MAGAZINE H)evote^ to tbc Science of IReUaion, tbe IReliQion ot Science, an& tbe Brtenaion ot tbe IReliaious parliament f&ea Ediior: D«. Paul Cahos. Associates: **' j Mary Cab's VOL. XVIII. (no. 2) February, 1904. NO. 573 CONTENTS: Frontispiece. The Chandos Portrait of Shakespeare. Who Wrote Shakespeare? (Illustrated.) The Shakespeare Family. John Shakespeare the Glover and His Son. —The Will and the Tomb- stones of the Shakespeare Family. —The Poet. —The Identification and the Stratford Monument. —The Tombstones of Dr. and Mrs. Hall. —The Posthumous Folio Edition. —Vicar Ward's Testimony. —Ben Jonson's Testimony. —Legends. —Biographies. —Our Conjec- ture, —Portrayals of the Poet. —Conclusion. Editor 65 The Japanese Floral Calendar. (Illustrated.) The Plum. Ernest W. Clement, M. A 107 Some Account of the Life of William Shakespeare. Nicholas Rowe . 113 Satire, *^ Praise Hypocrisy." Dr. Knighfs The of Dr. J. R. Phelps . 117 Prof. Karl Pearson on the Law of Progress 118 An Octogenarian Buddhist High Priest. (With Photograph. ) 122 My House. A Poem. E. A. Brackett 124 Book Reviews and Notes 124 CHICAGO Ube ©pen Court IpubUdbing Compani^ LONDON : Kegan Paul, Trench, Triibner & Co., Ltd. Per copy, 10 cenU (sixpence). Yearly, $1.00 (Id the U. P. U., 58. 6d.). Copyright, 1904, by The Open Court Publishing Co. Batered at the Cbicaco Pott 0fiC3 •• Seeond-CtaM Matter ^be ©pen Court A MONTHLY MAGAZINE H)cvote^ to the Science of IRelialon, tbe IRellaion ot Science, anb tbe Extension ot tbe IReligious parliament 1^ea Editor: Dii. Paul Carus. Associates: | J^^; Caboi**' VOL. XVIII. (no.
    [Show full text]