Managing Forests for Trees and Birds in Massachusetts

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Managing Forests for Trees and Birds in Massachusetts Managing Forests for Trees and Birds in Massachusetts A Guide to Habitat Assessments and Silvicultural Practices Adapted from Vermont’s Foresters for the Birds Project Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE MASSACHUSETTS FOREST BIRDS 1 Massachusetts Forest Birds Massachusetts has more than 3 million acres Not all landowners will be candidates for More than 200 species of birds breed in 2 Evaluating a Project of forested land, and about 75% of that land is creating young forest habitat, perhaps due to their Massachusetts every year, and more than 100 of 2 Step 1: Identify Regional privately owned (Thompson et al. 2014). This management goals or property size. Instead, they those species nest in our forests. Identifying all Conservation Needs means that private landowners are positioned to may want to create mature forest habitats that are species by sight and sound — and knowing their 3 Atlantic Coastal Pine Barrens be the most significant contributors to creating beneficial for wildlife. There is a need to improve respective habitat associations — is a daunting 3 Northeastern Coastal Zone and maintaining habitat for forest birds and other the understory and midstory structure in much task, even for experts. To make the connection 4 Northeastern Highlands wildlife. of our older forests, which would enhance the between forest birds and silviculture practices 6 Step 2: Determine Landscape habitat for mature forest birds. Many of these more clear, we have selected a suite of species for Given the scale and rapid pace of development Condition for Birds species, such as Wood Thrush and Eastern each ecoregion of the state. The birds in these and suburbanization in Massachusetts, our 8 Step 3: Analyze Stand Conditions Wood-pewee, are also declining. groups, the Focal Birds, were chosen because existing forest resources are becoming 14 Special Considerations for they: Young Forest Habitat increasingly valuable to the Commonwealth and Last, it is important to remember that the goal is 16 Adverse Impacts of Deer our wildlife. Thoughtful management of our to create a diverse, healthy, and resilient • Are a conservation priority in the region, 17 Making Management Decisions undeveloped lands can create forests that work ecosystem, and is not solely focused on just birds or statewide 17 Management Option 0: for both landowners and wildlife, help buffer the and forests. Much like the “canary in the coal • Are relatively simple to identify by sight Let it Grow Commonwealth from the anticipated effects of mine” expression, birds are indicators of or sound 18 Management Option 1: climate change, and also serve as shelter for ecosystem health (Niemi and McDonald 2004). A • Collectively use a wide range of forest Low-intensity Harvest species that are at risk of decline. forest with viable populations of White-throated types and habitat conditions Sparrows, Ruffed Grouse, or Wood Thrush is a • Are likely to respond positively to some 19 Management Option 2: The nature of this work is continual. Forest forest that is supporting a large variety of other common silviculture practices Moderate-intensity Harvest composition and structure change over time, and wildlife species as well. 20 Management Option 3: as a stand ages it provides habitat for These species do not occur in our forests alone. High-intensity Harvest different wildlife communities. In this document Each species is likely to be found in conjunction 23 Bird-friendly Best Management Practices we present the basic principles of evaluating with other declining species, so management 23 Companion Documents forest habitat for birds, and provide suggestions for the Focal Birds will benefit other birds and and Additional Resources on how to utilize silviculture in managing for wildlife. 24 Credits that habitat. We approach silviculture through Birds with Silviculture in Mind: A Pocket Guide to 24 Work Cited not only the lens of timber production, but also Focal Birds for Massachusetts Foresters is a quick- 25 Photo Credits the lens of forest bird production. reference, full-color look at each of the Focal The age composition of forests in Massachusetts Birds. It is an essential companion document to Acknowledgements is decidedly skewed toward older trees, with only this guide. Funding for adapting this publication to a small percentage of forests younger than 30 Massachusetts was provided through the DCR years old (Figure 1). The underrepresentation of Figure 1. The age composition of forestland managed Working Forest Initiative. young forests comes at a cost to the wildlife that by the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and depend on them. This cost is reflected by declines Wildlife is generally representative of the entire The original project on which this publication in both the range and abundance of many species state, with few areas of early successional habitat. was based was supported by the Northeastern of young forest specialists across the state. For Area State and Private Forestry, U.S. Forest example, Chestnut-sided Warbler and Service, and TogetherGreen, a National White-throated Sparrow are two species that rely Audubon program with funding from Toyota. on young forest patches — and are two species Thanks to all of the foresters participating in the that are declining in the state. Foresters for the Birds Program, who provided feedback on the original documents. 1 EVALUATING A PROJECT Creating a Foresters for the Birds Stewardship Atlantic Coastal Pine Barrens Northeastern Coastal Zone Northeastern Highlands Plan is similar to assembling a typical plan, but (SOUTHE AST) CE NTRAL SE C ( ) W (WE ST) there is additional emphasis given to creating Covering Cape Cod, the Islands, and much of Found in central and northeastern Massachusetts, This region, covering western and north central habitat that will support species in need of conser- Plymouth County, these are forests dominated this is perhaps the most heterogeneous region. Massachusetts, contains some of the state’s most vation. It considers habitat at three scales, going by xeric site species like pitch pine and various These forests typically support oak-pine and productive forest soils — particularly in the tree oaks. Dense understories of scrub oak and from the largest to the smallest: oak-mixed hardwood stands. Soils are generally limestone regions of Berkshire County — as huckleberry are common, and wetlands may acidic and sandy but not xeric. This zone includes well as some of its least productive sites, like 1. The context of the respective ecoregion contain Atlantic white-cedar. Fire and wind the more southern oak-hickory forest type, some those in the cold, boggy headwater regions where 2. The landscape surrounding the parcel (e.g., hurricanes) have been important red spruce and balsam fir become significant elements of the northern hardwood forest, and 3. The stand level characteristics disturbances historically, and therefore these components. The forests are principally all variations in between. Along with the Atlantic forests are considered to be disturbance northern hardwoods with varying components After evaluating the current habitat conditions, dependent. Some recommended silvicultural Coastal Pine Barrens, this zone has a high density of oak and red spruce. A cooler climate, more work with the landowner to assign and prioritize practices mimic this disturbance. of human settlement and cities, and forest birds rugged terrain, and higher elevations are management activities based on combined timber are highly dependent on the remaining tracts of important underlying habitat components and bird habitat objectives, and incorporate Bird- forest. in this zone. These forests are productive friendly Best Management Practices (BBMPs) breeding grounds for a high diversity of birds. during implementation (see page 23 for more details). STEP 1 IDENTIFY REGIONAL CONSERVATION NEEDS Massachusetts hosts a broad diversity of natural forest communities across the state. These forest communities are commonly grouped into three ecoregions based on similar forest types, ecosys- tems, and wildlife communities (Figure 2). Each Brown Thrasher and Northern Bobwhite are Canada Warbler and Wood Thrush are two Mourning Warbler and White-throated Sparrow are two important birds that can benefit from some important birds that can benefit from some two important birds that can benefit from some has a slightly different assemblage of birds, as silvicultural practices in the SE ecoregion silvicultural practices in the C ecoregion silvicultural practices in the W ecoregion well as different patterns of human land use: Figure 2. The three ecoregions of Massachusetts with outlines of municipal borders. Each region has a slightly different bird community and different land use patterns and considerations. 2 3 When analyzing an ecoregion, consider the Table 1. Focal Bird species by ecoregion. SE – (Southeast) Atlantic Coastal Pine Barrens following: C – (Central) Northeastern Coastal Zone W – (West) Northeastern Highlands • What are the resident Focal Birds • How densely populated is the region? For (Table 1)? Some species are included in all example, the Northeastern Coastal Zone and Species Regions three ecoregions; others are limited to only Atlantic Coastal Pine Barrens are more densely one or two. While some species occur populated by humans, resulting in greater Mature Forest Black-and-white Warbler SE C W statewide, they may only be designated as fragmentation of forest habitats. The effects of Wood Thrush SE C W Focal Birds
Recommended publications
  • Checklist of the Birds of East Stroudsburg University
    Checklist of the Birds of East Stroudsburg University Terry Master Alexandra Machrone and Terry Master Department of Biological Sciences Checklist of the Birds of East Stroudsburg University Map of East Stroudsburg University Checklist of the Birds of East Stroudsburg University Relative Abundance* Quadrant Location on Map** Seen Preferred Habitat Abundant Expected Common Aerial A Uncommon Developed D Rare Forest Cluster F Occasional Wetland/Ponds W Periodic Irruption * Grassland G Species Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Habitat Loc ANSERIFORMES Anatidae Snow Goose A,W,G Canada Goose A,F,W,G Wood Duck W Mallard Duck A,D,W American Black Duck W Ring-necked Duck W GALLIFORMES Phasianidae Wild Turkey F,G COLUMBIFORMES Columbidae Rock Dove D,F,G Mourning Dove D,F,G CUCULIFORMES Cuculidae Yellow-billed Cuckoo F Black-billed Cuckoo F CAPRIMULGIFORMES Caprimulgidae Common Nighthawk A,D,F,G Apodidae Chimney Swift A,D Trochilidae Ruby-throated Hummingbird D,F,G CHARADRIIFORMES Charadriidae Killdeer D,G Scolopacidae American Woodcock F,W Spotted Sandpiper W Solitary Sandpiper W Laridae Ring-billed Gull A,D,W,G Herring Gull A,D,W,G PELECANIFORMES Phalacrocoracidae Double-crested Cormorant W Checklist of the Birds of East Stroudsburg University Relative Abundance* Quadrant Location on Map** Seen Preferred Habitat Abundant Expected Common Aerial A Uncommon Developed D Rare Forest Cluster F Occasional Wetland/Ponds W Periodic Irruption * Grassland G Species Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Habitat Loc Ardeidae Great Blue
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerating the Development of Old-Growth Characteristics in Second-Growth Northern Hardwoods
    United States Department of Agriculture Accelerating the Development of Old-growth Characteristics in Second-growth Northern Hardwoods Karin S. Fassnacht, Dustin R. Bronson, Brian J. Palik, Anthony W. D’Amato, Craig G. Lorimer, Karl J. Martin Forest Northern General Technical Service Research Station Report NRS-144 February 2015 Abstract Active management techniques that emulate natural forest disturbance and stand development processes have the potential to enhance species diversity, structural complexity, and spatial heterogeneity in managed forests, helping to meet goals related to biodiversity, ecosystem health, and forest resilience in the face of uncertain future conditions. There are a number of steps to complete before, during, and after deciding to use active management for this purpose. These steps include specifying objectives and identifying initial targets, recognizing and addressing contemporary stressors that may hinder the ability to meet those objectives and targets, conducting a pretreatment evaluation, developing and implementing treatments, and evaluating treatments for success of implementation and for effectiveness after application. In this report we discuss these steps as they may be applied to second-growth northern hardwood forests in the northern Lake States region, using our experience with the ongoing managed old-growth silvicultural study (MOSS) as an example. We provide additional examples from other applicable studies across the region. Quality Assurance This publication conforms to the Northern Research Station’s Quality Assurance Implementation Plan which requires technical and policy review for all scientific publications produced or funded by the Station. The process included a blind technical review by at least two reviewers, who were selected by the Assistant Director for Research and unknown to the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Wood-Pewee Contopus Virens
    Eastern Wood-Pewee Contopus virens Folk Name: Dead-limb Bird, Parvee Status: Breeder Abundance: Fairly Common to Common Habitat: Exposed limb, often on a snag tree in an upland, usually open, woodland or woodlot of pines or hardwoods The Eastern Wood-Pewee is a small and generally inconspicuous bird, but it is perhaps our quintessential “flycatcher,” as it is most often seen when it darts out from an open perch—often a dead limb—expertly catches an insect, and then quickly returns to its perch. T. Gilbert Pearson watched one bird near Greensboro repeat this process over and over, catching 36 insects in 5 minutes. collection of eggs was sold to a museum and was stored This bird prefers mature, upland forest habitat, but it is for many years at the Utah Museum of Natural History also found in wooded residential areas. in Salt Lake City. Ultimately, these Eastern Wood-Pewee It was once one of the most common species of eggs became part of a larger regional collection which flycatcher breeding in our region, but today its breeding is now housed at the Western Foundation of Vertebrate population has been significantly reduced, due in part to Zoology in Camarillo, California. expanding urban development throughout the Piedmont. The Eastern Wood-Pewee is a neotropical migrant that Breeding Bird Survey trends in both North and South winters in northwest South America. R. B. McLaughlin Carolina indicate steep declines of Wood-Pewee recorded the spring arrival of the Wood-Pewee in populations in both states. It was one of the top 50 birds Statesville as averaging around 23 or 24 April in the late recorded on Charlotte Spring Bird Counts during the first 1800s.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird) Species List
    Aves (Bird) Species List Higher Classification1 Kingdom: Animalia, Phyllum: Chordata, Class: Reptilia, Diapsida, Archosauria, Aves Order (O:) and Family (F:) English Name2 Scientific Name3 O: Tinamiformes (Tinamous) F: Tinamidae (Tinamous) Great Tinamou Tinamus major Highland Tinamou Nothocercus bonapartei O: Galliformes (Turkeys, Pheasants & Quail) F: Cracidae Black Guan Chamaepetes unicolor (Chachalacas, Guans & Curassows) Gray-headed Chachalaca Ortalis cinereiceps F: Odontophoridae (New World Quail) Black-breasted Wood-quail Odontophorus leucolaemus Buffy-crowned Wood-Partridge Dendrortyx leucophrys Marbled Wood-Quail Odontophorus gujanensis Spotted Wood-Quail Odontophorus guttatus O: Suliformes (Cormorants) F: Fregatidae (Frigatebirds) Magnificent Frigatebird Fregata magnificens O: Pelecaniformes (Pelicans, Tropicbirds & Allies) F: Ardeidae (Herons, Egrets & Bitterns) Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis O: Charadriiformes (Sandpipers & Allies) F: Scolopacidae (Sandpipers) Spotted Sandpiper Actitis macularius O: Gruiformes (Cranes & Allies) F: Rallidae (Rails) Gray-Cowled Wood-Rail Aramides cajaneus O: Accipitriformes (Diurnal Birds of Prey) F: Cathartidae (Vultures & Condors) Black Vulture Coragyps atratus Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura F: Pandionidae (Osprey) Osprey Pandion haliaetus F: Accipitridae (Hawks, Eagles & Kites) Barred Hawk Morphnarchus princeps Broad-winged Hawk Buteo platypterus Double-toothed Kite Harpagus bidentatus Gray-headed Kite Leptodon cayanensis Northern Harrier Circus cyaneus Ornate Hawk-Eagle Spizaetus ornatus Red-tailed
    [Show full text]
  • Stephens Forest
    Field Checklist for Stephens Forest ___Warbling Vireo* ___Kentucky Warbler* * = confirmed or likely area breeder ___Red-eyed Vireo* ___Common Yellowthroat* Iowa Wildlife Action Plan Migratory Species of Greatest ___Hooded Warbler* Stephens Forest Conservation Need ___Blue Jay* ___American Redstart* Iowa Wildlife Action Plan Nesting Species of Greatest ___American Crow* ___Cerulean Warbler* Conservation Need ___Northern Parula* ___Horned Lark* ___Magnolia Warbler ___Greater White-fronted Goose ___Ring-billed Gull ___Bay-breasted Warbler Bird Conservation ___Snow Goose ___Purple Martin* ___Blackburnian Warbler ___Cackling Goose ___Rock Pigeon* ___Tree Swallow* ___Yellow Warbler* ___Canada Goose* ___Eurasian Collared-Dove* ___N. Rough-winged Swallow* ___Chestnut-sided Warbler* Area ___Wood Duck* ___Mourning Dove* ___Bank Swallow* ___Blackpoll Warbler ___Gadwall ___Cliff Swallow* ___Yellow-rumped Warbler ___American Wigeon ___Yellow-billed Cuckoo* ___Barn Swallow* ___Yellow-throated Warbler ___Mallard ___Black-billed Cuckoo* ___Black-throated Green Warbler ___Blue-winged Teal ___Black-capped Chickadee* ___Canada Warbler ___Northern Shoveler ___Barn Owl ___Tufted Titmouse* ___Wilson’s Warbler ___Hooded Merganser ___Yellow-breasted Chat* Belted Kingfisher ___Common Merganser ___Eastern Screech-Owl* ___Red-breasted Nuthatch USFWS ___Great Horned Owl* ___White-breasted Nuthatch* ___Eastern Towhee* ___Northern Bobwhite* ___Barred Owl* ___American Tree Sparrow ___Ring-necked Pheasant* ___Long-eared Owl ___Brown Creeper ___Chipping Sparrow* ___Ruffed
    [Show full text]
  • Hemlock Hardwood Pine Forest
    Appendix B: Habitats Hemlock Hardwood Pine Forest Photo by Ben Kimball Acres in NH: 2,039,406 Percent of NH Area: 34 Acres Protected: 387,487 Percent Protected: 19 Habitat Distribution Map Habitat Description The hemlock‐hardwood‐pine forest is a transitional forest region in New Hampshire (Sperduto 2011). This forest occurs between the northern hardwood ‐ conifer forest to the north and at higher elevations (mostly above 1,400 ft.) and the Appalachian oak ‐ pine forests to the south and at lower elevations (mostly below 900 ft.). This transitional forest lacks most boreal species and central hardwood species that characterize these other forests, but has many Alleghanian species such as white pine (Pinus strobus) and hemlock (Tsuga canadensis). Many of the other species of this system are common throughout the eastern United States. Hemlock ‐ hardwood ‐ pine forests are found throughout the state from the White Mountains south below about 1,500 ft. Dry‐mesic to mesic glacial till soils are most abundant, but this system also occupies river terraces, sand plains, and stabilized talus areas covered by a forest canopy. It includes dry, sandy soils with red oak and white pine that have not been burned enough to support pitch pine sand plains system. These areas are likely to succeed to hemlock and/or beech over the long term without the return of fire. The main matrix forest community that defines this system is hemlock ‐ beech ‐ oak ‐ pine forest. Hemlock and American beech (Fagus grandifolia) are the primary late‐successional trees in this community, with maximum ages of about 600 and 300 years, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Compendium of Avian Ecology
    Compendium of Avian Ecology ZOL 360 Brian M. Napoletano All images taken from the USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center. http://www.mbr-pwrc.usgs.gov/id/framlst/infocenter.html Taxonomic information based on the A.O.U. Check List of North American Birds, 7th Edition, 1998. Ecological Information obtained from multiple sources, including The Sibley Guide to Birds, Stokes Field Guide to Birds. Nest and other images scanned from the ZOL 360 Coursepack. Neither the images nor the information herein be copied or reproduced for commercial purposes without the prior consent of the original copyright holders. Full Species Names Common Loon Wood Duck Gaviiformes Anseriformes Gaviidae Anatidae Gavia immer Anatinae Anatini Horned Grebe Aix sponsa Podicipediformes Mallard Podicipedidae Anseriformes Podiceps auritus Anatidae Double-crested Cormorant Anatinae Pelecaniformes Anatini Phalacrocoracidae Anas platyrhynchos Phalacrocorax auritus Blue-Winged Teal Anseriformes Tundra Swan Anatidae Anseriformes Anatinae Anserinae Anatini Cygnini Anas discors Cygnus columbianus Canvasback Anseriformes Snow Goose Anatidae Anseriformes Anatinae Anserinae Aythyini Anserini Aythya valisineria Chen caerulescens Common Goldeneye Canada Goose Anseriformes Anseriformes Anatidae Anserinae Anatinae Anserini Aythyini Branta canadensis Bucephala clangula Red-Breasted Merganser Caspian Tern Anseriformes Charadriiformes Anatidae Scolopaci Anatinae Laridae Aythyini Sterninae Mergus serrator Sterna caspia Hooded Merganser Anseriformes Black Tern Anatidae Charadriiformes Anatinae
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report
    U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park, Maine Project Report Revised Edition – October 2003 Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U. S. Department of the Interior, U. S. Geological Survey. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park, Maine Sara Lubinski and Kevin Hop U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center and Susan Gawler Maine Natural Areas Program This report produced by U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center 2630 Fanta Reed Road La Crosse, Wisconsin 54603 and Maine Natural Areas Program Department of Conservation 159 Hospital Street 93 State House Station Augusta, Maine 04333-0093 In conjunction with Mike Story (NPS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) NPS, Natural Resources Information Division, Inventory and Monitoring Program Karl Brown (USGS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) USGS, Center for Biological Informatics and Revised Edition - October 2003 USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park Contacts U.S. Department of Interior United States Geological Survey - Biological Resources Division Website: http://www.usgs.gov U.S. Geological Survey Center for Biological Informatics P.O. Box 25046 Building 810, Room 8000, MS-302 Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225-0046 Website: http://biology.usgs.gov/cbi Karl Brown USGS Program Coordinator - USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Phone: (303) 202-4240 E-mail: [email protected] Susan Stitt USGS Remote Sensing and Geospatial Technologies Specialist USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Phone: (303) 202-4234 E-mail: [email protected] Kevin Hop Principal Investigator U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fernald Preserve Bird List
    Bird List Order: ANSERIFORMES Order: PODICIPEDIFORMES Order: GRUIFORMES Order: COLUMBIFORMES Family: Anatidae Family: Podicipedidae Family: Rallidae Family: Columbidae Black-bellied Whistling Duck Pied-billed Grebe Virginia Rail Rock Pigeon Greater White-fronted Goose Horned Grebe Sora Mourning Dove Snow Goose Red-necked Grebe Common Gallinule Order: CUCULIFORMES Ross’s Goose American Coot Order: SULIFORMES Family: Cuculidae Cackling Goose Family: Gruidae Family: Phalacrocoracidae Yellow-billed Cuckoo Canada Goose Sandhill Crane Mute Swan Double-crested Cormorant Black-billed Cuckoo Trumpeter Swan Order: CHARADRIIFORMES Order: PELECANIFORMES Order: STRIGIFORMES Tundra Swan Family: Recurvirostridae Family: Ardeidae Family: Tytonidae Wood Duck Black-necked Stilt American White Pelican Barn Owl Gadwall Family: Charadriidae American Bittern Family: Strigidae Eurasian Wigeon Black-bellied Plover Least Bittern Eastern Screech-Owl American Wigeon American Golden Plover Great Blue Heron Great Horned Owl American Black Duck Semipalmated Plover Great Egret Barred Owl Mallard Killdeer Snowy Egret Long-eared Owl Blue-winged Teal Family: Scolopacidae Little Blue Heron Short-eared Owl Norther Shoveler Spotted Sandpiper Cattle Egret Northern Saw-whet Owl Northern Pintail Solitary Sandpiper Green Heron Garganey Greater Yellowlegs Order: CAPRIMULGIFORMES Black-crowned Night-Heron Green-winged Teal Willet Family: Caprimulgidae Canvasback Family: Threskiornithidae Lesser Yellowlegs Common Nighthawk Glossy Ibis Redhead Upland Sandpiper Ring-necked Duck White-faced
    [Show full text]
  • INCIDENTAL TAKE and POPULATION DYNAMICS of NESTING BIRDS in a RED PINE (Pinus Resinosa) PLANTATION in SOUTHERN ONTARIO UNDER SINGLE-TREE SELECTION HARVESTING
    INCIDENTAL TAKE AND POPULATION DYNAMICS OF NESTING BIRDS IN A RED PINE (Pinus resinosa) PLANTATION IN SOUTHERN ONTARIO UNDER SINGLE-TREE SELECTION HARVESTING A Thesis Submitted to the Committee on Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Science in the Faculty of Arts and Science TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright by Ian R. Fife 2015 Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate M.Sc. Program May 2015 ii Abstract INCIDENTAL TAKE AND POPULATION DYNAMICS OF NESTING BIRDS IN A RED PINE (Pinus resinosa) PLANTATION UNDER SINGLE-TREE SELECTION HARVESTING Ian R. Fife I determined the direct influence of single-tree selection harvesting on the daily nest survival rates and nest success of 5 focal bird species within a monotypic red pine (Pinus resinosa) plantation on the western edge of the Oak Ridges Moraine in southern Ontario, Canada. I located and monitored 290 nests during the 2012 and 2013 breeding season. I used the logistic-exposure method to evaluate the daily nest survival rates of American Robin (Turdus migratorius), Eastern Wood-pewee (Contopus virens), Ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapilla), Rose-breasted Grosbeak (Pheucticus ludovicianus), and Red-eyed Vireo (Vireo olivaceus). Only five nests were destroyed as a result of forestry activity over the study period. Neither daily nest survival rates nor nest success of these focal species were substantially affected by single-tree selection harvesting. I also monitored the impact of single-tree selection harvesting on the density and territory size of 4 of 5 focal species. Ovenbird had a significantly smaller territory size but decreased density in the harvested areas.
    [Show full text]
  • A Conservation Vision for Maine Using Ecological Systems
    A Conservation Vision for Maine Using Ecological Systems Hemlock forest Shrub swamp Cedar swamp Northern hardwood forest Justin Schlawin and Andy Cutko Maine Natural Areas Program Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry February 2014 A Conservation Vision for Maine Using Ecological Systems Contents Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction: ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Maine’s Conservation Lands: ........................................................................................................................ 4 Ecological Sections: ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Ecological Systems GIS Layer: ....................................................................................................................... 7 Consolidating Comparable Ecological Systems: ........................................................................................ 7 Requirements for Representation ................................................................................................................ 8 Isolating ‘quality’ patches for each ecological system type .................................................................... 12 Aggregation ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • After 25 Years, What Does the Pennsylvania Regeneration Study Tell Us About Oak/Hickory Forests Under Stress?
    AFTER 25 YEARS, WHAT DOES THE PENNSYLVANIA REGENERATION STUDY TELL US ABOUT OAK/HICKORY FORESTS UNDER STRESS? William H. McWilliams, James A. Westfall, Patrick H. Brose, Shawn L. Lehman, Randall S. Morin, Todd E. Ristau, Alejandro A. Royo, and Susan L. Stout1 Abstract.—The Pennsylvania Regeneration Study was initiated in 1989 because of concerns about a long history of stress on oak/hickory (Quercus/Carya) forests from herbivory and other factors. The study, which addresses the need for landscape-level information about regeneration quality and abundance, comprises a suite of regeneration indicator measurements installed on a subset of Forest Inventory and Analysis monitoring plots. The State’s oak/hickory forests have been under increasing stress because aging stands that originate from large- scale disturbances from more than 100 years ago are inundated by herbivory of preferred plants and invasion of native and nonnative invasive plants. Maintaining oaks in young stands is difficult because of herbivory, invasive plants, climate change, lack of fire, and other factors. This paper summarizes the Pennsylvania Regeneration Study results, offering a look at likely challenges faced by managers and policy makers, as well as by inventory specialists who design forest inventories for stressed forests. INTRODUCTION Pennsylvania is well known for its oak/hickory (Quercus/Carya) forest, which accounts for more than half the State’s forest land, or 9.1 million acres. Oaks deliver more income from timber products than any other genus and are by far the most important source of mast for wildlife. A lack of major disturbances such as wildfire has led to conditions in which a dearth of available light limits the establishment of young oak seedlings.
    [Show full text]