DOCSLIB.ORG

Worth 4 Dot App for Determining Size and Depth of Suppression

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Worth 4 Dot App for Determining Size and Depth of Suppression This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Webber, Ann L., Mandall, Thomas R., Molloy, Darcy T., Lister, Lucas J.,& Birch, Eileen E. (2020) Worth 4 dot app for determining size and depth of suppression. Translational Vision Science and Technology, 9(4), Article number: 9. This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/202216/ c 2020 The Authors This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu- ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog- nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record (i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub- mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) can be identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear- ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.4.9 Article Worth 4 Dot App for Determining Size and Depth of Suppression Ann L. Webber1, Thomas R. Mandall1, Darcy T. Molloy1, Lucas J. Lister1, and Eileen E. Birch2,3 1 School of Optometry and Vision Science, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia 2 Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, TX, USA 3 UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA Correspondence: Ann L. Webber, Purpose: To describe and evaluate an iOS application suppression test, Worth 4 Dot Queensland University of App (W4DApp), which was designed and developed to assess size and depth of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin suppression. Grove, Queensland 4059, Australia. Methods: e-mail: [email protected] Characteristics of sensory fusion were evaluated in 25 participants (age 12– 69 years) with normal (n = 6) and abnormal (n = 19) binocular vision. Suppression zone Received: August 12, 2019 size and classification of fusion were determined by W4DApp and by flashlight Worth4 Accepted: December 13, 2019 Dot (W4D) responses from 33 cm to 6 m. Measures of suppression depth were compared Published: March 9, 2020 between the W4DApp, the flashlight W4D with neutral density filter bar and the dichop- Keywords: suppression; binocular tic letters contrast balance index test. vision; Worth 4 Dot Results: There was high agreement in classification of fusion between the W4DApp Citation: Webber AL, Mandall TR, method and that derived from flashlight W4D responses from 33 cm to 6m(α = Molloy DT, Lister LJ, Birch EE. Worth 0.817). There were no significant differences in success rates or in reliability between 4 Dot App for determining size and the W4DApp or the flashlight W4D methods for determining suppression zone size. depth of suppression. Trans Vis Sci W4DApp suppression zone size strongly correlated to that determined with the flash- Tech. 2020;9(4):9, light W4D (rho = 0.964, P < 0.001). W4DApp depth of suppression measures showed https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.4.9 significantly higher success ratesχ ( 2 = 5.128, P = 0.043) and reliability (intraclass corre- lation analysis = 0.901) but no significant correlation to the depth of suppression calcu- lated by flashlight W4D and neutral density bar (rho = 0.301, P = 0.399) or contrast balance index (rho =−0.018, P = 0.958). Conclusions: The W4DApp has potential clinical benefit in measuring suppression zone size; however, further modifications are required to improve validity of suppression depth measures. Translational Relevance: W4DApp iOS application will be a convenient tool for clinical determination of suppression characteristics. be difficulty achieving interpretable outcomes when Introduction examining young children.4 Several modifications to the original test design have resulted from these identi- The Worth 4 Dot (W4D) test was first developed fied limitations.4 An early adaptation by Hardy7 led to assess binocular perception by Claud Worth in to the introduction of near point testing using a flash- 19031 and remains one of the world’s most frequently light apparatus. The use of polarized targets improved used clinical tools to evaluate unilateral suppression interpretable response rates and significantly decreased under binocular viewing conditions.2–4 Criticism of dissociation,2,3 and increased success rates in young the test includes lack of standardization in manufac- children was achieved with use of shaped targets ture, and in spacing and subtended visual angles of instead of dots.8 the dots.5 Further, the highly dissociative red/green The W4D test is the accepted method for assess- filters may introduce artifact responses,6 and there can ing the presence or absence of central and peripheral Copyright 2020 The Authors tvst.arvojournals.org | ISSN: 2164-2591 1 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Downloaded from tvst.arvojournals.org on 07/20/2020 Worth 4 Dot App for Size and Depth of Suppression TVST | March 2020 | Vol. 9 | No. 4 | Article 9 | 2 fusion.3 The separation of dots commonly used for and depth of suppression, and suggest our future the 3 m “distance” test subtend 1.25° visual angle and modifications. evaluates central fusion. The separation of dots for the 33 cm “near” test subtend 6° and evaluates periph- eral fusion.3,5,9 To further describe suppression, the Methods W4D flashlight version is used to calculate the sizeof a suppression scotoma by changing the test viewing distance to vary visual angle of dot separation.3,9 Study Design However, this evaluation is time-consuming in clinical This is a proof-of-concept study that compared the practice and requires visual angle calculations to deter- determination of fusion classification by the W4DApp mine the exact scotoma size. Additionally, varying the and Good-lite 950100 Worth 4-Dot Flashlight at differ- viewing test distances may induce a change in accom- ent viewing distances. In those participants with abnor- modative demand and vergence posture. Although the mal sensory fusion, the success rate, reliability and extent of influence of accommodation and vergence validity for determination of suppression zone size, and posture on suppression is not established, controlling depth of suppression were compared between the novel these factors may improve the validity of W4D results. W4DApp and flashlight W4D. Depth of suppression can be graded clinically by intro- ducing a calibrated neutral density filter to lower the Participants relative brightness of targets; however, limited test- retest reliability is reported.10–12 Characteristics of suppression were determined in Recent studies have reported a significant correla- 25 participants prospectively recruited for a study of tion between the severity of suppression and the sever- clinical binocular vision tests (19 participants with ity of amblyopia, despite these conditions being previ- abnormal binocular vision development from strabis- ously considered separate entities.11,13 Furthermore, mus or amblyopia and 6 participants with normal amblyopia treatment targeted at reducing suppression vision development). Participants were aged from can significantly improve both binocular vision and 12 years, and all had a comprehensive vision and monocular acuity.11,13,14 These findings emphasize the intraocular health exam that included previous treat- need to develop a more standardized tool for assessing ment history, visual acuity (electronic Early Treat- size and depth of suppression for use in clinical practice ment of Diabetic Study e-ETDRS), clinical stereoacu- and in clinical trials. ity (Randot Preschool Stereoacuity Test; Stereo Optical We developed an iOS application suppression test, Co, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), ocular alignment (unilat- the Worth 4 Dot App (W4DApp) to address the eral and prism alternating cover test) and Worth 4 limitations of the classic Worth 4 Dot test. This Dot response at 6 m and 33 cm. Classification criteria software features the principle design of the W4D with for normal binocular vision group were best-corrected additional features to easily quantify size and depth visual acuity of 0.00 logMAR or better, and 60 sec of suppression scotomas without complex calculations. of arc stereoacuity on Randot Preschool Stereoacu- The App interface is simple to operate, and the iOS ity Test, no suppression on classical 6 m Worth 4 Dot format makes this tool highly accessible to all clinicians test and no known history of amblyopia or strabis- with a compatible device. mus. Classification criteria for abnormal binocular The main clinical advantage of the W4DApp is vision group (BV-abnormal) were a known history of the ability to adjust dot parameters, including target strabismus (with or without amblyopia), or amblyopia separation and contrast. This allows accurate changes (anisometropic, strabismic or combined mechanism). to visual angle separation from the same viewing Amblyopia was defined as an interocular difference in distance, to assess suppression zone size while control- best-corrected visual acuity of 0.20 logMAR or more. ling any effects of accommodation and vergence. No participants had coexisting general developmental, The W4DApp also determines depth of suppression systemic, or ocular pathology or congenital abnormal- measures without requiring additional filters. These ity. size and depth measures provide a quantitative assess- Data were collected at the Queensland University ment of suppression severity, which can have potential of Technology. The study was conducted in accordance benefit to clinicians in monitoring amblyopia, strabis- with the requirements of the Queensland University of mus, or both.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Binocular Vision
    Continuing education CET Binocular vision Part 5 – Binocular sensory status and miscellaneous tests In the latest addition to our occasional series on the assessment and management of binocular vision in practice, Priya Dabasia looks at sensory status and its measurement. Module C16058, one general CET point for optometrists and dispensing opticians he preceding accounts in ● Confusion – the superimposition this mini series of binocular of two dissimilar images in higher vision (BV) testing have processing, experienced predominantly detailed procedures for on observing complex scenes such as ‘a the cover test (CT), ocular room’. The same patient is more likely motility and heterophoria to report diplopia on viewing a small, Tcompensation. The final two articles bright target such as a penlight aim to outline the assessment of ● Retinal rivalry – the observation binocular sensory status, stereopsis and of alternating percepts or a combined convergence. ‘mosaic’ so that images from each eye Having two frontally positioned eyes are never seen simultaneously. separated by approximately 65mm enhances many aspects of our visual Anomalous retinal correspondence performance – a wide panorama, (ARC) is considered a more efficient higher acuity, and three-dimensional sensory adaptation to heterotropia as perception to a distance of 200 metres, suppression occurs in localised zones provided both eyes are fully functional Figure 1 to the fovea of one eye corresponds to a rather than spanning the binocular and coordinated together. Anomalies Worth 4-Dot point temporal to the fovea in the other field. It facilitates a weaker form of of binocular function have often been test eye. In reality, BSV can still be achieved BSV, relieving diplopia while enabling described as ‘the hidden learning with misaligned visual axes provided a good level of depth perception of up disability’ as they impair academic the disparity occurs within the limits of to 100’’.
    [Show full text]
  • Worth 4 Dot App for Determining Size and Depth of Suppression
    Article Worth 4 Dot App for Determining Size and Depth of Suppression Ann L. Webber1, Thomas R. Mandall1, Darcy T. Molloy1, Lucas J. Lister1, and Eileen E. Birch2,3 1 School of Optometry and Vision Science, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia 2 Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, TX, USA 3 UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA Correspondence: Ann L. Webber, Purpose: To describe and evaluate an iOS application suppression test, Worth 4 Dot Queensland University of App (W4DApp), which was designed and developed to assess size and depth of Technology, 60 Musk Avenue, Kelvin suppression. Grove, Queensland 4059, Australia. Methods: e-mail: [email protected] Characteristics of sensory fusion were evaluated in 25 participants (age 12– 69 years) with normal (n = 6) and abnormal (n = 19) binocular vision. Suppression zone Received: August 12, 2019 size and classification of fusion were determined by W4DApp and by flashlight Worth4 Accepted: December 13, 2019 Dot (W4D) responses from 33 cm to 6 m. Measures of suppression depth were compared Published: March 9, 2020 between the W4DApp, the flashlight W4D with neutral density filter bar and the dichop- Keywords: suppression; binocular tic letters contrast balance index test. vision; Worth 4 Dot Results: There was high agreement in classification of fusion between the W4DApp Citation: Webber AL, Mandall TR, method and that derived from flashlight W4D responses from 33 cm to 6m(α = Molloy DT, Lister LJ, Birch EE. Worth 0.817). There were no significant differences in success rates or in reliability between 4 Dot App for determining size and the W4DApp or the flashlight W4D methods for determining suppression zone size.
    [Show full text]
  • Binocular Vision
    BINOCULAR VISION Rahul Bhola, MD Pediatric Ophthalmology Fellow The University of Iowa Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences posted Jan. 18, 2006, updated Jan. 23, 2006 Binocular vision is one of the hallmarks of the human race that has bestowed on it the supremacy in the hierarchy of the animal kingdom. It is an asset with normal alignment of the two eyes, but becomes a liability when the alignment is lost. Binocular Single Vision may be defined as the state of simultaneous vision, which is achieved by the coordinated use of both eyes, so that separate and slightly dissimilar images arising in each eye are appreciated as a single image by the process of fusion. Thus binocular vision implies fusion, the blending of sight from the two eyes to form a single percept. Binocular Single Vision can be: 1. Normal – Binocular Single vision can be classified as normal when it is bifoveal and there is no manifest deviation. 2. Anomalous - Binocular Single vision is anomalous when the images of the fixated object are projected from the fovea of one eye and an extrafoveal area of the other eye i.e. when the visual direction of the retinal elements has changed. A small manifest strabismus is therefore always present in anomalous Binocular Single vision. Normal Binocular Single vision requires: 1. Clear Visual Axis leading to a reasonably clear vision in both eyes 2. The ability of the retino-cortical elements to function in association with each other to promote the fusion of two slightly dissimilar images i.e. Sensory fusion. 3. The precise co-ordination of the two eyes for all direction of gazes, so that corresponding retino-cortical element are placed in a position to deal with two images i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Strabismus: a Decision Making Approach
    Strabismus A Decision Making Approach Gunter K. von Noorden, M.D. Eugene M. Helveston, M.D. Strabismus: A Decision Making Approach Gunter K. von Noorden, M.D. Emeritus Professor of Ophthalmology and Pediatrics Baylor College of Medicine Houston, Texas Eugene M. Helveston, M.D. Emeritus Professor of Ophthalmology Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis, Indiana Published originally in English under the title: Strabismus: A Decision Making Approach. By Gunter K. von Noorden and Eugene M. Helveston Published in 1994 by Mosby-Year Book, Inc., St. Louis, MO Copyright held by Gunter K. von Noorden and Eugene M. Helveston All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission from the authors. Copyright © 2010 Table of Contents Foreword Preface 1.01 Equipment for Examination of the Patient with Strabismus 1.02 History 1.03 Inspection of Patient 1.04 Sequence of Motility Examination 1.05 Does This Baby See? 1.06 Visual Acuity – Methods of Examination 1.07 Visual Acuity Testing in Infants 1.08 Primary versus Secondary Deviation 1.09 Evaluation of Monocular Movements – Ductions 1.10 Evaluation of Binocular Movements – Versions 1.11 Unilaterally Reduced Vision Associated with Orthotropia 1.12 Unilateral Decrease of Visual Acuity Associated with Heterotropia 1.13 Decentered Corneal Light Reflex 1.14 Strabismus – Generic Classification 1.15 Is Latent Strabismus
    [Show full text]
  • Your Source Vision
    Good-Lite Product Catalog YOUR SOURCE for VISION Cognitive Test • Grating Acuity • Wall Charts • Handheld Charts • EyeSpy 20/20 • 10x18 Charts • ETDRS Charts • Low Vision • Intermediate Vision • Near Vision • Read- ing Cards • ETDRS Cabinet • Spot Vision Screener • ESV1200 - 9x14 • ESV1018 - 10x18 • Insta-Line • CSV-1000 • Super Pinhole • Accessories • Screening Software • Testing Software • Fixation • Occluders • Fun Frames • Prisms • Hyperopia • Retinoscopy • Eye Models • Stereo Test • Worth 4-Dot • Color Books & Tests • D15 Style Color Test • Desaturated 1-800-263-3557 Color Test • Projector Slides • Continuous Text • Adult Charts • Children Charts • Pediatric Charts • Vectographic Slides • Amsler Grid • Campimeter • Prism Bar • Loose Prism • Spanish • Vectograph • Maddox • Cylinders • Phoropter • Trial Lens/Frames • Filters • Risley • Eye PatchesGOOD-LITE • LEA Symbols • LEA Numbers • Contrast Sensitivity • Visual Field • Cognitive Vision • Adaptation • Color Vision • Optokinetic • Tangent Screen • Flat & Curved Prism • Magnifier • Flipper • Slit Lamp Celebrating More Than 80 Years of Good-Lite The Good-Lite Company is celebrating In the 1970s, Palmer worked with Otto in children and adults with developmental more than 80 years as the industry leader Lippmann, MD, to develop HOTV optotypes delays/disabilities. The American Academy of in illuminated cabinets; evidence-based eye using Sloan letters. Lippmann’s HOTV Pediatrics, et al., includes LEA Symbols on its charts, such as the LEA Symbols, and many optotypes — a modified version of a Stycar list of recommended tests for preschool vision more vision screening and testing products matching letters test based on Snellen screening. available in this catalog and online. letters — are useful for screening and testing Good-Lite values its key role in helping vision The combined efforts of Robert Good, vision of children as young as age 3 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantification of Stereopsis in Patients with Impaired Binocularity
    1040-5488/16/9306-0588/0 VOL. 93, NO. 6, PP. 588Y593 OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE Copyright * 2016 American Academy of Optometry ORIGINAL ARTICLE Quantification of Stereopsis in Patients with Impaired Binocularity Sang Beom Han*, Hee Kyung Yang*, Jonghyun Kim†, Keehoon Hong‡, Byoungho Lee‡, and Jeong-Min Hwang* ABSTRACT Purpose. To quantify stereopsis at distance resulting from binocular fusion in patients with impaired binocular vision using a three-dimensional (3-D) display stereotest. Methods. A total of 68 patients (age range, 6 to 85 years) with strabismus (40 esotropes and 28 exotropes) whose stereoacuity could not be measured with the near and distance Randot stereotests were included. Contour-based circles with a wide range of crossed horizontal disparities (2500 to 20 arcsec) displayed on a 3-D monitor were presented to subjects at 3 m. Between the patients who had stereoacuity of at least 2500 arcsec and those with no measurable stereoacuity, parameters including age, sex, best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent refractive error, Worth 4 dot test results, and type and angle of deviation were compared. Results. Stereoacuity at distance of 2500 arcsec or better was detected in 25 (63%) of 40 esotropes, and 16 (57%) of 28 exotropes, although stereoacuity of 800 arcsec or better was found only in two (5%) esotropes and one (4%) exotrope. Patients with stereopsis were significantly younger (19.3 T 16.9 years) than those with no measurable stereopsis (31.5 T 26.4 years) (p = 0.040). There were no significant differences in best-corrected visual acuity, presence of amblyopia 920/100, spherical equivalent refractive error, type of deviation, deviation angle, sex, and Worth 4 dot test results between these groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Improvement of Binocular Summation in Intermittent Exotropia Following Successful Postoperative Alignment Yueping Li*, Juan Ding & Wei Zhang
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Improvement of binocular summation in intermittent exotropia following successful postoperative alignment YuePing Li*, Juan Ding & Wei Zhang To investigate the improvement of binocular summation (BiS) at high contrast (100%) and diferent low contrasts (10, 5 and 2.5%) in patients with intermittent exotropia (IXT) after successfully postoperative alignment. A total of 76 patients (aged 9–40 years) with IXT and poor control at distance before surgery were enrolled in this study. The postoperative deviations ranged between 4 PD esophoria to 10 PD exotropia in the primary position (at near and at distance) in all the enrolled patients. The follow-up visits were 2–3 months after the surgery. We analyzed preoperative and postoperative BiS and the proportions of patients with diferent BiS for the high contrast and the low contrasts. Binocular summation (BiS) was classifed into three situations: binocular summation, equal and inbibition. The results of the distant random dots stereograph (RDS) were grouped into A, unable to recognize; B, moderate, 200″ ≤ RDS ≤ 400″ and C, good, RDS < 200″. Following the successful postoperative alignment, the proportion of patients with BiS were increased from 9.2 to 40.8%, 17.1 to 53.9%, 21.1 to 76.1% and 21.1 to 72.4% at 100%, 10%, 5% and 2.5% contrasts respectively. At 2.5% contrast, (1) more patients presented binocular summation in the groups B and C; (2) postoperative improvements of binocular visual acuity (BVA) in groups B (1.5 ± 1.03 lines) and C (1.57 ± 1.26 lines) were signifcantly diferent from the BVA in the group A (0.74 ± 1.00 line); and (3) in the group with central fusion, more patients presented BiS after surgery and the postoperative BVA improved by 1.43 ± 1.16 lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Ishihara Colour Test Stereopsis Tests Worth Light Test Gima Colour Test Lang Stereotest Stereoptic Test Schiötz Tonometer
    DIAGNOSTICS ISHIHARA COLOUR TEST GIMA COLOUR TEST ISHIHARA COLOUR TEST • 31287 GIMA ADULT COLOUR TEST - 15 plates These series of plates are designed to provide a test which • 31286 GIMA PEDIATRIC COLOUR TEST - 10 plates gives a quick and accurate assessment of colour vision Single plates packed deficiency of congenital origin. This is the most common in a practical form of colour vision disorders. Most aluminium box. cases of congenital colour vision deficiency are characterized by a red-green deficiency which may be of two types: a protan type which may be absolute (protanapia) or partial (protanomalia), and a deutan type which may be absolute (deuteranopia) or partial WORTH LIGHT TEST (deuteranomalia). • 31289 WORTH LIGHT TEST - with red/green glasses The Worth 4 dot test, is a clinical test for suppression GIMA ISHIHARA COLOUR TEST code of either the right or left eye. Suppression occurs 31290 Book of 10 plates for illitterates during binocular vision, when the brain does not 31291 Book of 24 plates process the information received from either of the eyes. This is a common adaptation to strabismus, 31292 Book of 38 plates amblyopia, and aniseikonia. 31289 STEREOPSIS TESTS LANG STEREOTEST 31294 • 31283 FLY STEREO ACUITY TEST • 31294 LANG STEREOTEST I 31295 • 31284 BUTTERFLY STEREO ACUITY TEST 31284 • 31295 LANG STEREOTEST II Designed to rapidly test for amblyopia Stereotest I was created to and strabismus using gross to fine simplify stereopsis screening stereopsis (4800 to 20 sec of arc): in children. It is based on two - graded circle test from 400 sec now principles: on random dots and down to 20 sec on cylinder gratings.
    [Show full text]
  • Accommodation and Vergence Testing Procedures
    ACCOMMODATION AND VERGENCE TESTING PROCEDURES Lab Manual for: V652 CLINICAL SCIENCES III: Accommodation and Binocular Vision (This material is not for unauthorized duplication or distribution) INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF OPTOMETRY FALL 2015 Instructor: David A. Goss, O.D., Ph.D. Email: [email protected] www.opt.indiana.edu/people/faculty/goss.htm 1 2 CONTENTS OF V652 LABORATORY MANUAL LAB SCHEDULE: …………………………………………………..page 5 PAGE REFERENCES IN REFERENCE TEXTS:.…………..…...page 7 LAB # 1: Binocular Vision Tests at Distance ……………………...page 9 LAB #2: Binocular Vision Tests & Relative Accommodation Tests at Near………………….……… page 25 LAB #3: Binocular Vision Tests at Near; Sequencing & Tentative Add …………………………………………page 43 LAB #4: MEM Dynamic Retinoscopy & Accommodative Facility……………………………………………………page 57 LAB #5: Dynamic Retinoscopy & Alternative Phoria and Vergence Tests…...………………………………….………...page 69 LAB #6: Additional Binocular Vision Tests …………….…..……page 83 LAB #7: Cycloplegic Refraction; Tests for Presbyopia ……….page 103 PROFICIENCY #1: Prelims, refraction & photometry ……....page 116 PROFICIENCY #2: Near-point tests, alternative tests, & dynamic retinoscopy ……………………page 125 3 INTRODUCTION In the first part of the course you will continue to learn more of the procedures in a basic vision examination with emphasis on binocular vision evaluation. Then you will learn more of the auxiliary or alternative tests that you will need for Clinic and you will learn the conditions under which it will be advisable to use them. This manual is designed to be the laboratory instructions for the course. At the end of the instructions for each lab you will find two copies of the laboratory report for that lab. One of these report forms needs to be turned in at the end of each lab period to the teaching assistant for the lab.
    [Show full text]
  • Persistent Diplopia in Visually Mature Patients
    Persistent Diplopia in treatment that either establishes fusion or Visually Mature Patients. reactivates a preexisting sensory adaptation. This case series reviews these other causes of Is it Intractable or diplopia. something else? A Review and Case Series INTRODUCTION Robert P. Rutstein, OD, MS, FAAO Diplopia is the condition in which a single Professor Emeritus School of image is perceived simultaneously as being two Optometry, University of Alabama rather than one.1 When on examination there is at Birmingham Birmingham, Alabama inability to fuse the two images and also suppress the second image, the diplopia is intractable.2,3 Intractable diplopia is constant and occurs in all ARTICLE positions of gaze despite achieving satisfactory ocular alignment with either prisms, lenses, ABSTRACT vision therapy, extraocular muscle surgery, or Diplopia is described as being intractable when botulinum toxin injection. Some patients may there is inability to both fuse the two images actively avoid fusion by performing involuntary and suppress the second image. Intractable ocular movements of their nonfixating eye, diplopia persists despite achieving ocular reporting one image jumping over the other alignment using either prisms, lenses,vision when the strabismus is neutralized either with therapy,extraocular muscle surgery, or botul- prisms or with haploscopic devices such as the inum toxin injection. Treatment usually synoptophore.4-6 resorts to occluding or fogging the patient’s Since fusion cannot be established, nondominant eye. Often times, however, treatment for intractable diplopia is usually adults having other causative mechanisms palliative. Occlusion or fogging of the for supposedly persistent diplopia are able nondominant eye with patches,3 frosted to achieve comfortable single vision with spectacle lenses,7 partially occlusive filters,8,9 monovision glasses or monovision contact 10,11 3,7,12 Correspondence regarding this article should be lenses, occlusive contact lenses, corneal emailed to Robert P.
    [Show full text]
  • Anomalous Retinal Correspondence (ARC)  Monofixation Syndrome
    1 Sensory Adaptations to Strabismus Hol up…Before we start talking about sensory adaptations to strabismus, let’s review the basic principles of binocular vision 2 Q Sensory Adaptations to Strabismus With respect to abnormalities of binocular vision: What is the difference between visual confusion and diplopia? 3 Q Sensory Adaptations to Strabismus With respect to abnormalities of binocular vision: What is the difference between visual confusion and diplopia? Confusion occurs when… 4 A Sensory Adaptations to Strabismus With respect to abnormalities of binocular vision: What is the difference between visual confusion and diplopia? Confusion occurs when…different images are projected onto corresponding retinal areas (We’ll unpack the notion of ‘corresponding retinal areas’ shortly) 5 Q Sensory Adaptations to Strabismus With respect to abnormalities of binocular vision: What is the difference between visual confusion and diplopia? Confusion occurs when…different images are projected onto corresponding retinal areas Visual confusion produces the visual impression of… 6 A Sensory Adaptations to Strabismus With respect to abnormalities of binocular vision: What is the difference between visual confusion and diplopia? Confusion occurs when…different images are projected onto corresponding retinal areas Visual confusion produces the visual impression of… two objects occupying a single location in visual space 7 Sensory Adaptations to Strabismus (Eyes esodeviated) Fovea Fovea These misaligned eyes are foveating different objects, and thus each is projecting a different image to the visual cortex as being the object of regard. 8 Sensory Adaptations to Strabismus (Eyes esodeviated) Fovea Fovea These misaligned eyes are foveating different objects, and thus each is projecting a different image to the visual cortex as being the object of regard.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sensorimotor Exam
    The Sensorimotor Exam Shelley Klein, CO Tufts Medical Center Boston, MA [email protected] 1 Indications for the Sensorimotor exam Sensory Motor Diplopia Determine phoria/tropia Asthenopia Uncover patterns NRC or ARC Restrictions Worth 4 Dot Test Single Cover Test Red Filter Test Prism Cover Test Stereopsis Ductions NPC 2 1 Start with the Single Cover Test…. Then sensory, Worth 4 Dot Test Then motor, Prism and Cover Test 3 Start with SCT (at a minimum in primary position @ D and N) – it’s important to know what you’re starting with: Is there a phoria or tropia present? Is it intermittent? Is there a fixation preference? Then proceed to sensory testing In your office this should include stereopsis Here we’ll review the W4DT Finish with the motor part of the exam In your office this should include versions, ductions and NPC Here we’ll cover the Prism and Cover Test 2 Worth 4 Dot Test or Red Filter Test used to determine fusion, diplopia or suppression A. Fusion B. Uncrossed diplopia (ET with NRC) C. Crossed diplopia (XT with NRC) D. Suppression OD 4 NRC or ARC NRC ARC Visual direction of • Retinal elements each fovea and that are corresponding physiologically non- retinal elements ET-NRC corresponding have are the same acquired a common visual direction. If tropic may be XT-NRC either diplopic • Sensory adaptation or suppressing to avoid diplopia suppression 5 3 The Prism and Cover Test Neutralization of deviation with prisms by optically moving the image onto the fovea Factors affecting prism and cover measurements •Hold prisms in frontal plane position •High refractive errors •Stacking prisms •Primary and Secondary deviations 1° Fix with non-paretic eye / prisms over paretic eye = Smaller deviation 2° Fix with paretic eye / prisms over non-paretic eye = Larger deviation •Angle Kappa – angle that forms between the visual and pupillary axes Positive angle simulates an XT Negative angle simulates an ET 6 The Prism and Cover Test: important pearls to remember… o Use an accommodative fixation target – don’t block pt’s view with your head! .
    [Show full text]