Comparative Efficacy and Side-Effect Profile of Ketamine And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043457 on 12 February 2021. Downloaded from PEER REVIEW HISTORY BMJ Open publishes all reviews undertaken for accepted manuscripts. Reviewers are asked to complete a checklist review form (http://bmjopen.bmj.com/site/about/resources/checklist.pdf) and are provided with free text boxes to elaborate on their assessment. These free text comments are reproduced below. ARTICLE DETAILS TITLE (PROVISIONAL) Comparative efficacy and side effect profile of ketamine and esketamine in the treatment of unipolar and bipolar depression: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis AUTHORS Zhan, Zhiqing; Wang, Xichao; Chen, Qing; Xiao, Zhidai; Zhang, Bin VERSION 1 – REVIEW REVIEWER Kenji Hashimoto Chiba University Center for Forensic Mental Health, Japan But I am an inventor of patent of the use of arketamine in the treatment of depression. REVIEW RETURNED 26-Sep-2020 GENERAL COMMENTS I have some minor comments. Abstract: Introduction: The sentence "Ketamine and esketamine are enantiomers" is wrong. I suggests that "Esketamine is (S)- enantiomer of ketamine" is better. Introduction: There is one article reporting head-to-head study of intravenous esketamine and intravenous ketamine in patients http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ (Correia-Melo et al, J Affect Disord 2020). Introduction There is a pilot report showing antidepressant actions of arketamine in treatment-resistant patients with MDD (Leal et al, Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2020). Please cite this paper in the introduction. on September 24, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. REVIEWER Jennifer Phillips University of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research, Canada REVIEW RETURNED 20-Nov-2020 GENERAL COMMENTS This systematic review will compare intravenous ketamine to intranasal esketamine in terms of therapeutic efficacy and side effects for the treatment of depression in patients with major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. The study protocol is clear, well written and methodologically sound. However, I question the rationale for its publication when according to the authors stated timeline, the study has likely already occurred and the results may soon be ready for publication (within the paper, the authors state that they expect to submit the manuscript reporting their results before December 20, 2020). General comments 1 BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043457 on 12 February 2021. Downloaded from The registration information should be updated as it appears the systematic review has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020201559). For data collection/extraction, it is not clear how the authors plan to deal with concomitant medications. There appears to be no mention of distinguishing between ketamine/esketamine as monotherapy versus adjunctive therapy. It is unclear what the authors mean by placebo? Will RCTs only be included if they used a true placebo as a comparator (ex. saline)? What about RCTs that compare ketamine to an active control (such as midazolam)? I commend the authors for including examination of potential sex differences for these treatments. Specific suggested revisions follow. Introduction -Page 5, Line 5. Unusual to highlight cognitive deficit over all other aspects of depression and its elevated burden to the individual and society at large- recommend revising opening sentence to better define depression. -Page 5, Line 11. Please change “full dose and long-term treatment” to “adequate dose and sufficient duration”. Also, the reference for this sentence is incorrect; I assume the sentence references the STAR-D trial? Please revise. -Page 5, Line 15. For more clarity when first introducing ketamine please specify that you are referring to the racemic mixture or ketamine hydrochloride, a mixture of the R and S enantiomers. -Page 5, Line 21. Revise language, treatment with ketamine does not necessarily “require intravenous administration”. It is most commonly administered intravenously to treat depression but other http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ routes of administration exist including oral, sublingual, transmucosal, intranasal, intramuscular, and subcutaneous. -Page 5, Line 36. While true that no RCTs comparing intranasal esketamine and intravenous ketamine have been published to date, several such studies are currently ongoing- that can be mentioned here. -Page 5, Line 38. Problem with tense, this sentence refers to having conducted the systematic review already. Protocol paper should use future tense throughout. on September 24, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. Methods and Analysis -Page 6, Line 9. Inclusion criteria B please clarify intravenous ketamine -Page 6, Line 40-45. Inconsistent spelling of crossover (sometimes two words, sometimes hyphenated), please correct “precross- overphase”. -Page 6, Line 45. Please specify how you will deal with papers that fail to report pre-crossover phase data? Will you contact study authors directly to obtain this data? -Page 7, Table 1, Section 1.2 CNKI searing strategy. Unable to review (language). 2 BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043457 on 12 February 2021. Downloaded from VERSION 1 – AUTHOR RESPONSE Reviewing: 1 Comments to the Author: I have some minor comments. #1 Abstract: Introduction: The sentence "Ketamine and esketamine are enantiomers" is wrong. I suggests that "Esketamine is (S)- enantiomer of ketamine" is better. Response: Thank you for this comment. As you advised, we have changed the sentence "Ketamine and esketamine are enantiomers" to "Esketamine is (S)- enantiomer of ketamine". Revision: Abstract: Esketamine is (S)- enantiomer of ketamine. (Page 2, Line 5) #2 Abstract: Introduction: There is one article reporting head-to-head study of intravenous esketamine and intravenous ketamine in patients (Correia-Melo et al, J Affect Disord 2020). Response: Thank you for this comment. As you advised, we have revised this sentence and cited the article (Correia-Melo et al, J Affect Disord 2020). http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ Revision: Abstract: However, there is limited evidence comparing esketamine and ketamine in treating unipolar and bipolar depression have been published so far. (Page 2, Line 7-9) Introduction: However, only one head- to-head study assessed the efficacy and safety of ketamine compared to esketamine. (Page 3, Line 28-30) on September 24, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. #3 Introduction: There is a pilot report showing antidepressant actions of arketamine in treatment-resistant patients with MDD (Leal et al, Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2020). Please cite this paper in the introduction. Response: Thank you for this comment. As you advised, we have cited this paper in the introduction. Revision: Introduction: To date, there are several studies16-22 evaluating the efficacy and side effect profile of the enantiomers of ketamine, including esketamine16-21, the S (-)-enantiomer of ketamine, and arketamine22, the R (-)-enantiomer of ketamine. (Page 3, Line 26-28) 3 BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043457 on 12 February 2021. Downloaded from Reference 16.Daly EJ, Singh JB, Fedgchin M, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine Adjunctive to Oral Antidepressant Therapy in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2018; 75(2):139-148 17.Popova V, Daly EJ, Trivedi M, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Flexibly Dosed Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a Newly Initiated Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Active-Controlled Study. Am J Psychiatry 2019; 176(6):428-438 18.Canuso CM, Singh JB, Fedgchin M, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine for the Rapid Reduction of Symptoms of Depression and Suicidality in Patients at Imminent Risk for Suicide: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study. Am J Psychiatry 2018; 175(7):620-630 19.Kryst J, Kawalec P, Pilc A. Efficacy and safety of intranasal esketamine for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 21(1):9-20. 20.Fedgchin M, Trivedi M, Daly EJ, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a New Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study (TRANSFORM-1). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2019;22(10):616-630. 21.Fu DJ, Ionescu DF, Li X, et al. Esketamine Nasal Spray for Rapid Reduction of Major Depressive Disorder Symptoms in Patients Who Have Active Suicidal Ideation With Intent: Double-Blind, Randomized Study (ASPIRE I). J Clin Psychiatry 2020 81(3):19m13191. 22.Leal GC, Bandeira ID, Correia-Melo FS, et al. Intravenous arketamine for treatment-resistant depression: open-label pilot study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2020. doi: 10.1007/s00406-020- 01110-5. http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author: #1 This systematic review will compare intravenous ketamine to intranasal esketamine in terms of on September 24, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. therapeutic efficacy and side effects for the treatment of depression in patients with major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. The study protocol is clear, well written and methodologically sound. However, I question the rationale for its publication when according to the authors stated timeline, the study has likely already occurred and the results may soon be ready for publication (within the paper, the authors state that they expect to submit the manuscript reporting their results before December 20, 2020). Response: Thank