DOCSLIB.ORG

Wilderness Study Areas Remaining in Nevada 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wilderness Study Areas Remaining in Nevada 2018 Wilderness Study Areas Remaining In Nevada 2018 Recommended County Recommended Total Battle Mountain "Non- "Suitable" Acreage Field Office Suitable" Kawich 0 54,320 54,320 Nye Rawhide Mountain 0 64,360 64,360 Nye South Reveille 33,000 73,200 106,200 Nye Palisade Mesa 66,110 33,440 99,550 Nye Blue Eagle 0 59,560 59,560 Nye The Wall 30,320 7,680 38,000 Nye Fandango 0 530 530 Nye Morey Peak 0 5,070 5,070 Nye Silver Peak Range 0 33,900 33,900 Esmeralda Pigeon Spring 0 3,575 3,575 Esmeralda Queer Mountain 42,650 38,900 81,550 Esmeralda 1/3 Grapevine Mountains 23,150 43,650 66,800 Esmeralda 2/3 Nye Antelope Range 38,586 5,114 43,700 Nye ½ Lander Simpson Park 0 49,670 49,670 ½ Eureka Roberts Mountain 0 15,090 15,090 Eureka Mountain Meadow Nye 0 22 22 Instant Study Area Pinyon Joshua Esmeralda Instant 0 560 560 Study Area 17 areas 233,816 488,641 722,457 Carson City Recommended Recommended Total County Field Office "Suitable" "Non-Suitable Acreage Clan Alpine Churchill 68,458 127,670 196,128 Mountains Stillwater Range 0 94,607 94,607 Churchill 2/3 Churchill Desatoya Mountains 43,180 8,222 51,402 1/3 Lander Job Peak 0 90,209 90,209 Churchill Gabbs Valley Range 0 79,600 79,600 Mineral Douglas/Lyo Burbank Canyons 0 13,395 13,395 n 6 areas 111,638 413,703 525,341 Recommended Recommended Total County Elko Field Office "Suitable" "Non-Suitable" Acreage Bluebell 0 55,665 55,665 Elko Goshute Peak 61,004 8,766 69,770 Elko South Pequop 34,544 6,546 41,090 Elko Bad Lands 8,415 1,011 9,426 Elko Cedar Ridge 0 10,009 10,009 Elko Red Spring 0 7,847 7,847 Elko Little Humboldt River 29,775 12,438 42,213 Elko Rough Hills 6,685 0 6,685 Elko South Fork Owyhee Elko 5,180 2,662 7,842 River Owyhee Canyon 13,525 8,350 21,875 Elko 10 areas 159,128 113,294 272,422 Recommended Recommended Total County Ely Field Office "Suitable" "Non-Suitable" Acreage Goshute Canyon 362 0 362 Elko Park Range 47,268 0 47,268 Nye Riordan's Well 0 57,002 57,002 Nye 3 areas 47,630 57,002 104,632 Las Vegas Field Recommended Recommended Total County Office "Suitable" Non-Suitable" Acreage Mount Stirling 750 4,850 5,600 Clark/Nye Million Hills 0 21,296 21,296 Clark Resting Springs 0 3,850 3,850 Nye Virgin Mountain Instant Clark 0 6,560 6,560 Study Area 4 Areas 750 36,556 37,258 Winnemucca Field Recommended Recommended Total County Office "Suitable" "Non-Suitable" Acreage Poodle Mountain 0 142,050 142,050 Washoe Fox Range 0 75,404 75,404 Washoe Pole Creek 0 12,969 12,969 Washoe Selenite Mountains 0 32,041 32,041 Pershing Mount Limbo 12,750 11,002 23,752 Pershing China Mountain 0 10,358 10,358 Pershing Tobin Range 0 13,107 13,107 Pershing North Fork of the Little Humboldt 8,900 60,783 69,683 Humboldt River Augusta Mountains 0 89,372 89,372 Per/Lander/Chur Pueblo Mountains 600 0 600 Humboldt Disaster Peak 12,100 1,100 13,200 Humboldt Lahontan Cutthroat Humboldt Trout Instant Study 0 12,316 12,316 Area 15 areas 50,750 469,752 520,502 Public land located in Nevada, but administered by BLM California Offices. Eagle Lake Recommended Recommended Total County Field Office "Suitable" "Non-Suitable" Acreage Five Springs 0 1,383 1,383 Washoe Skedaddle 589 0 589 Washoe Dry Valley Rim 45,127 31,050 76,177 Washoe Buffalo Hills 0 45,287 45,287 Washoe Twin Peaks 47,837 17,277 65,114 Washoe 5 areas 93,553 94,997 188,550 Surprise Recommended Recommended Total County Field Office "Suitable" "Non-Suitable" Acreage Wall Canyon 0 46,305 46,305 Washoe Sheldon Contiguous 748 22,952 23,700 Washoe Massacre Rim 22,465 78,825 101,290 Washoe 3 areas 23,213 148,082 171,295 GRAND TOTAL 720,478 1,822,027 2,542,505 *BLM acreage only; private acreage excluded. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • C:\A Projects\AAA IBLA Decs\061IBLA\L370-375.Wpd
    CHURCHILL COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS IBLA 81-539 Decided February 17, 1982 Appeal from a decision of the Nevada State Director, Bureau of Land Management, denying a protest of wilderness study area designations. 8500 (N-932.6). Affirmed. 1. Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976: Wilderness--Wilderness Act--Words and Phrases. "Roadless." H.R. Rep. No. 94-1163, 94th Cong., 2d Sess. 17 (1976), provides a definition of "roadless" adopted by the Bureau of Land Management in its Wilderness Inventory Handbook. The word "roadless" refers to the absence of roads which have been improved and maintained by mechanical means to insure relatively regular and continuous use. A way maintained solely by the passage of vehicles does not constitute a road. 2. Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976: Wilderness--Wilderness Act Sights and sounds outside a wilderness study area will be considered during the study phase of the wilderness review process absent a finding by BLM during the inventory phase that such impacts are adjacent to the unit and are so extremely imposing that they cannot be ignored, and and if not considered, reasonable application of inventory guidelines would be questioned. 3. Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976: Wilderness--Wilderness Act The requirement in section 2(c) of the Wilderness Act of 1964, 16 U.S.C. § 1131(c) (1976), that a wilderness possess, inter alia, outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of 61 IBLA 370 IBLA 81-539 recreation is properly construed to require outstanding opportunities for either solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation; both need not be present in an inventory unit to allow the unit to enter the study phase of the wilderness review process.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY of the SOUTHERN PART of the SAND SPRINGS RANGE, CHURCHILL COUNTY, NEVADA by S. K. M. Abdullah a Thesis Submitted in Part
    GEOLOGY OF THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE SAND SPRINGS RANGE, CHURCHILL COUNTY, NEVADA By S. K. M. Abdullah A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Mackay School of Mines University of Nevada January, 1966 a. Approved by M. ,r Thesis Director Approved by j^T- \ Department Head Approved by Graduate Dean CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS........................................ vi ABSTRACT . ................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................ 2 Location and Accessibility ................................ 2 Scope and Method of Investigation.......................... 2 Previous Investigations ...................... 5 Acknowledgments ............................................ 5 GEOLOGIC SETTING ............................................ 7 GRANITIC ROCKS ................................... 8 Introduction .............................................. 8 The Pluton ................................................ 8 Porphyritic Quartz Monzonite ............................ Granodiorite ................................. 11- Contacts and Minor Structures ............................... 12 Origin ...................................... 12 A g e ......................................................... 12 The Dike Rocks .......... - ................................ 18 Aplite-Pegmatite Dikes ..................................... 18 Andesite Dikes ............................................. 1^ Rhyolite Dikes ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of NEVADA-RENO Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Un~Vrrsiryof Nevada-8.Eno Reno, Nevada 89557-0088 (702) 784-6691 FAX: (7G2j 784-1709
    UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA-RENO Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Un~vrrsiryof Nevada-8.eno Reno, Nevada 89557-0088 (702) 784-6691 FAX: (7G2j 784-1709 NBMG OPEN-FILE REPORT 90-1 MINERAL RESOURCE INVENTORY BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, CARSON CITY DISTRICT, NEVADA Joseph V. Tingley This information should be considered preliminary. It has not been edited or checked for completeness or accuracy. Mineral Resource Inventory Bureau of Land Management, Carson City District, Nevada Prepared by: Joseph V. Tingley Prepared for: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF E INTERIOR '\\ !\ BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Carson City Office Carson City, Nevada Under Cooperative Agreement 14-08-0001-A-0586 with the U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NEVADA BUREAU OF MINES AND GEOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, RENO January 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................ 3 LOCATION .......................... 4 MINERAL RESOURCES ...................... 4 MINING DISTRICTS AND AREAS .................. 6 ALLEN HOT SPRINGS AREA ................. 6 ALPINE DISTRICT .................... 7 AURORA DISTRICT .................... 10 BELL DISTRICT ..................... 13 BELLMOUNTAIN DISTRICT ................. 16 BENWAY DISTRICT .................... 19 BERNICE DISTRICT .................... 21 BOVARDDISTRICT .............23 BROKENHILLS DISTRICT ................. 27 BRUNERDISTRICT .................. 30 BUCKLEYDISTRICT ................. 32 BUCKSKINDISTRICT ............... 35 CALICO HILLS AREA ................... 39 CANDELARIA DISTRICT ................. 41 CARSON CITY DISTRICT .................. 44
    [Show full text]
  • Figs- 2, 6 Assemblage, Usage of Term Defined, 6 Elbow Canyon Thrust, 40, 45, 47- 52 I Augusta Mountain Formation, 23- 25; Figs
    I n d e x Adelaide thrust, 34, 44, 46- 49, 51; Eastern assemblage of lower and middle Figs. 6—7 ; PI. 2 Paleozoic rocks, 5 Anderson, C. A., 5 East Range, 7, 13, 16- 20, 22- 23, 40- 4I Antler orogeny, 5, 33- 35, 47, 52 46; Figs. 1, 4 ; PI. 2 Antler orogenic belt, 5, 7, 35, 37-38 Edna Formation, 7, 14, 16, 36, 40, 51; Antler Peak Limestone, 16, 35; Figs. 2, 6 Fig. 1; PI. 2 Antler sequence, 14, 16, 35; Figs. 2- 3, Edna Mountain Formation, 16, 35, 7 ; PI 2 52- 53; Figs- 2, 6 Assemblage, usage of term defined, 6 Elbow Canyon thrust, 40, 45, 47- 52 I Augusta Mountain Formation, 23- 25; Figs. 6, 7 Fig. 2 ; PI. 1 Elko County, Nevada, 37 Augusta Mountains, 16, 19, 23; Fig. 1; El Paso Mountains, California, 35-36 PI. 2 Eugene Mountains, 21; Fig. 1 Augusta sequence, 7, 19, 23- 25, 37, 41, Excelsior Formation, 26- 28; Fig. 2 44, 5° - 5 j ; Figs. 2- 3> 7; pls- 1-2 Excelsior Mountains, 27; Fig. 1 Battle Formation, 14, 35; Fig. 2 Favret Formation, 23- 24; Fig. 2 ; PI. 1 Battle Mountain 7, 12, 14, 16- 18, 34, Ferguson, H. G., 3, 5- 7, 13- 14, 16- 18, 36, 40, 47, 51; Fig. 1 ; PI. 2 20, 22- 23, 26- 28, 30- 36, 38, 39, Berry, W. B. N., 12 40- 46, 50 Cameron, E. N., 21 Fish Creek Mountains, 24; Fig. 1; PI. 2 Candelaria Formation, 26, 28; Fig. 2 Gabbs Formation, 28, 31- 32; Figs.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to Oligocene-Miocene Ash-Flows and Source Calderas in the Great Basin of Nevada
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FIELD GUIDE TO OLIGOCENE-MIOCENE ASH-FLOWS AND SOURCE CALDERAS IN THE GREAT BASIN OF NEVADA David A. John1, editor Open-File Report 94-193 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. .S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA INTRODUCTION This field guide was prepared for a field trip to be held in conjunction with the Eighth International Conference on Geochronology, Cosmochronology and Isotopic Geology (ICOG8) scheduled for June 1994 in Berkeley, California. The road log and field guide covers the area between Caliente and Fallen, Nevada, and includes a stop near Soda Springs, California. The trip is 5 days long. Days 1 to 3 are covered in Part 1, which describes the Indian Peak and Central Nevada caldera complexes and exposures in White River Narrows and includes a road log between Caliente and Austin, Nevada. Part 2 describes day 4 and the morning of day 5. Included in this section are descriptions of the Stillwater caldera complex and its distal eruptive products and a road log from Austin to Fallen, Nevada. The afternoon of day 5 is covered in Part 3 which describes exposures of the Nine Hill Tuff near Soda Springs, California. PART 1. INDIAN PEAK CALDERA COMPLEX, WHITE RIVER NARROWS ("OUTFLOW ALLEY"), THE CENTRAL NEVADA CALDERA COMPLEX, AND ROAD LOG FROM CALIENTE TO AUSTIN, NEVADA Myron G.
    [Show full text]
  • Timing of Late Quaternary Faulting in the 1954 Dixie Valley Earthquake Area, Central Nevada
    Timing of late Quaternary faulting in the 1954 Dixie Valley earthquake area, central Nevada John W. Bell Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557 Terry Katzer Las Vegas Valley Water Districi, Las Vegas, Nevada 89153 ABSTRACT the basis of genesis, surface morphology, relative The 1954 Dixie Valley earthquake (M 6.9) in central Nevada produced about 3 m of total stratigraphic position, degree of soil develop- vertical displacement distributed across two principal fault zones along the east flank of the ment, tephrochronology, and radiometric data Stillwater Range. Most of the 1954 displacement was along the range-front fault with minor (Table 1). Lithologic characteristics were impor- amounts on the piedmont fault zone, in contrast to an earlier Holocene displacement that was tant, but not determining, criteria. This ap- restricted to the piedmont fault. Detailed chronostratigraphic, exploratory drilling, and trench- proach, commonly referred to as "alluvial ing studies indicate that faulting events have migrated back and forth between the range-front geomorphology" (e.g., Ku et al., 1979), facili- and piedmont fault zones in the late Quaternary. Prior to the 1954 earthquake, the range-front tates the mapping of synchronous (chronostrati- fault last ruptured in the late Pleistocene, during a large-magnitude event here called the IXL graphic) units. event. The northern half of the piedmont fault zone last ruptured between 1.5 and 6.8 ka during The oldest differentiated unit, old alluvial-fan a large-magnitude event here called the Bend event. On the basis of 6 m total slip since the deposits (Qfo), occurs as dissected remnants lo- deposition of shoreline gravels at ~12 ka, the estimated Holocene vertical-slip rate is 0.5 cally preserved across the range-front fault and mm/yr for the Dixie Valley rupture zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Evaluation of the Seismicity, Geology, and Hydrology of the Northern Sand Springs Range, Churchill County, Nevada, As a Possible Site for Project Shoal
    TEI-796 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Preliminary Evaluation of the Seismicity, Geology, and Hydrology of the Northern Sand Springs Range, Churchill County, Nevada, as a Possible Site for Project Shoal By William S. Twenhofel John E. Moore Rudolph A. Black July 1961 This report is preliminary and has not been edited for con­ formity with Geological Survey format and nomenclature Geological Survey Washington, D. C. Prepared by Geological Survey for the UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Division of Technical Information LEGAL NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of Government sponsored work. Neither the United States, nor the Commission, nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission: A. Makes any warranty or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the accu­ racy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe privately owned rights; or B. Assumes any liabilities with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed In this report. As used in the above, "person acting on behalf of the Commission" includes any em­ ployee or contractor of the Commission, or employee of such contractor, to the extent that such employee or contractor of the Commission, or employee of such contractor prepares, disseminates, or provides access to, any Information pursuant to his employment or contract with the Commission, or his employment with such contractor. This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geologic Structure of Dixie Valley Drew L
    GRC Transactions, Vol. 42, 2018 Which Geologic Factors Control Permeability Development in Geothermal Systems? The Geologic Structure of Dixie Valley Drew L. Siler and Jonathan M.G. Glen U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, USA Keywords Structure, Dixie Valley, faults, upwelling, gravity, magnetic, geothermal, potential field, permeability, fault, fracture ABSTRACT Geothermal systems occur where subsurface permeability and temperature are sufficiently high to drive fluid circulation. In the Great Basin region of the United States, which hosts ~20% of domestic geothermal electricity generation capacity and much of the projected undeveloped and undiscovered resource, crustal heat flow is relatively high, so permeability is the dominant factor controlling the occurrence or absence of a geothermal system. In the most general sense, fracture permeability along faults and/or networks of interconnected faults and fractures serves as a pathway for fluids upwelling from depth. Within the Great Basin, Dixie Valley hosts an anomalously high number of geothermal systems. It is unclear whether this relatively dense collection of systems is associated with regional strain or structural patterns, local structural or geological characteristics, basin hydrogeology, or some other factors. The relatively rich data-set available for Dixie Valley, and the well-studied nature of the area affords the opportunity to characterize the geologic and lithologic factors that control permeability development at the local scale. There are at least eleven distinct geothermal systems in Dixie Valley, NV. We utilize a wealth of existing data, which have been collected over several decades, to assess the geologic controls on geothermal fluid upwelling in these systems. 1. Introduction Dixie Valley is an ~100 km-long, ~15 km-wide north-northeast trending basin in west central Nevada (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Some Mining Districts in Humboldt County, Neyada
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOE 4:14: NOTES ON SOME MINING DISTRICTS IN HUMBOLDT COUNTY, NEYADA BY FREDERICK LESLIE RANSOME WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1909 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 7 Itinerary.................................................................. 9 General history of mining development..................................... 10 Literature................................................................. 13 Seven Troughs district..................................................... 14 Introduction.......................................................... 14 General geology........................................................ 15 Topography....................................................... 15 Early exploration................................................. 16 Pre-Tertiary rocks.................................................. 16 Tertiary volcanic rocks............................................. 18 Distribution and development of the mines............................. 20 Character of the deposits.............................................. 22 Outlook for the district................................................. 25 Rosebud district.......................................................... 25 Situation and history.......................... ; ........................ 25 General geology........................................................ 26 Ore deposits.........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stillwater Range G-E-M Resources Area (GRA No. NV-04) : Technical
    Bin "9 ?-^i^^ 80 « ^Sm ' STILLWATER RANGE G-E-M QQ4? 1 \3 RESOURCES AREA C d "2L (GRA NO. NV-04) TECHNICAL REPORT (WSAs NV 030-104 and 030-127) Contract YA-554-RFP2-1054 Prepared By Great Basin GEM Joint Venture 251 Ralston Street Reno, Nevada 89503 For Bureau of Land Management Denver Service Center Building 50, Mailroom Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225 Final Report May 6, 1983 . .. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 I INTRODUCTION 3 II. GEOLOGY 10 1 PHYSIOGRAPHY 10 2 ROCK UNITS 10 3 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY AND TECTONICS 11 4. PALEONTOLOGY 12 5 HISTORICAL GEOLOGY 13 III ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES 14 A. METALLIC MINERAL RESOURCES 14 1 Known Mineral Deposits 14 2. Known Prospects, Mineral Occurrences and Mineralized Areas 16 3 Mining Claims 16 4. Mineral Deposit Types ' 17 5 Mineral Economics 19 B. NONMETALLIC MINERAL RESOURCES 22 1. Known Mineral Deposits 22 2. Known Prospects, Mineral Occurrences and Mineralized Areas • 3. Mining Claims, Leases and Material Sites 23 4. Mineral Deposit Types 23 5 Mineral Economics 24 . Table of Contents cont. Page C. ENERGY RESOURCES 25 Uranium and Thorium Resources 25 1. Known Mineral Deposits 25 2. Known Prospects, Mineral Occurrences and Mineralized Areas 25 3 Mining Claims 25 4. Mineral Deposit Types 26 5 Mineral Economics 26 Oil and Gas Resources 27 1 • Known Oil and Gas Deposits 2. Known Prospects, Oil and Gas Occurrences, and Petroliferous Areas 3. Oil and Gas Leases 28 4. Oil and Gas Deposit Types 28 5. Oil and Gas Economics 28 Geothermal Resources 28 1.
    [Show full text]
  • DM's RAC Report
    BLM-WINNEMUCCA DISTRICT (WD) PROGRAM OVERVIEW Justin Drew, District Manager September, 2016 through March, 2017 Black Rock Field Office (BRFO) San Emidio: San Emidio has received authorization to drill their two observation wells. Drilling commenced in early July 2016. Humboldt River Field Office (HRFO) Blue Mountain: The plant is operating normally and currently producing approximately 40 megawatts. Blue Mountain was purchased by Alta Rock in June of 2015. New York Canyon: Terra-Gen Power, Dixie Development Company had two approved projects. One is for drilling and testing up to 15 observation wells. The second is for utilization plan (a 70 megawatt power plant) and inter-tie power lines that was recently acquired by Ormat. Ormat was recently authorized to drill two separate production wells and they are in the process of getting an approval for two Temperature Gradient Core Holes in the area. Brady Hot Springs: A proposal has been submitted by Ormat to replace the flash plant that is currently operating and replacing it with an upgraded plant. The plant is operating normally. Leach Hot Springs. Ormat reports that no additional exploration is anticipated at the site at this time. Baltazor Hot Springs: The baseline studies for the Sandhill Skipper are complete and the company is considering moving forward with power plant development. Geothermal Leasing (WD): One lease parce will be put up for lease in October of 2017. These parcel is located about 30 miles southwest of Lovelock in Wahoe County Black Rock Field Office Hycroft Mine: Since July 2015, Hycroft suspended mining operations. They continue to process gold and silver through the operation of the heap leach pads and processing plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Flow Near the Shoal Site, Sand Springs Range, Nevada: Impact of Density-Driven Flow
    DOEINVIl0845-51 DC-703 GROUNDWATER FLOW NEAR THE SHOAL SITE, SAND SPRINGS RANGE, NEVADA: IMPACT OF DENSITY-DRIVEN FLOW Prepared by Jenny Chapman, Todd Mihevc, and Alan McKay Submitted to Nevada Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy Las Vegas, Nevada September 1994 Publication #45130 This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government Neither the United States nor the United States Department of Energy, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, mark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions ofauthors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831; prices available from (615) 576-8401. Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161. DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible .in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. This page intentionally left blank DOEINV/10845-51 UC-703 GROUNDWATER FLOW NEAR THE SHOAL SITE, SAND SPRINGS RANGE, NEVADA: Impact of Density-Driven Flow Prepared by Jenny Chapman, Todd Mihevc, and Alan McKay Water Resources Center Desert Research Institute University and Community College System of Nevada Publication No.
    [Show full text]