DOCSLIB.ORG

Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield: Why the Update? by MAJ James H

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield: Why the Update? by MAJ James H Subscriptions: Free unit subscriptions are available by emailing the Editor at [email protected]. Include the complete mailing address (unit name, street address, and building number). Don’t forget to email the Editor when your unit moves, deploys, or redeploys to ensure continual receipt of the Bulletin. Reprints: Material in this Bulletin is not copyrighted (except where indicated). Content may be reprinted if the MI Professional Bulletin and the authors are credited. Our mailing address: MIPB (ATZS-DST-B), Dir. of Doctrine and Intel Sys Trng, USAICoE, 550 Cibeque St., Fort Huachuca, AZ 85613-7017 Commanding General MG Laura A. Potter Purpose: The U.S. Army Intelligence Center of Excellence publishes the Military Intelligence Professional Bulletin Chief of Staff (MIPB) quarterly under the provisions of AR 25-30. COL Peter J. Don MIPB presents information designed to keep intelligence Chief Warrant Officer, MI Corps professionals informed of current and emerging devel- CW5 David J. Bassili opments within the field and provides an open forum Command Sergeant Major, MI Corps in which ideas; concepts; tactics, techniques, and proce- dures; historical perspectives; problems and solutions, etc., CSM Warren K. Robinson can be exchanged and discussed for purposes of profes- STAFF: sional development. Editor Tracey A. Remus By order of the Secretary of the Army: [email protected] JAMES C. MCCONVILLE Associate Editor General, United States Army Maria T. Eichmann Chief of Staff Design and Layout Official: Emma R. Morris Penelope J. McIntosh KATHLEEN S. MILLER Cover Design Administrative Assistant Penelope J. McIntosh to the Secretary of the Army Military Staff 1921404 CPT Emily R. Morrison From the Editor The following themes and deadlines are established: April-June 2020, Intelligence Analysis. This issue will focus on the various aspects of intelligence analysis and their importance to operations. Deadline for article submission is 19 December 2019. July-September 2020, Collection Management. This issue will focus on how the intelligence staff executes the tasks of collection management in support of information collection. Deadline for article submission is 3 April 2020. If you would like to receive a notification email when new MIPB issues become available on Intelligence Knowledge Network, send an email to [email protected] requesting addition to MIPB’s announcement dis- tribution list. If you would like to receive a notification email when new intelligence doctrine is published, send an email to [email protected] requesting addition to the new doctrine announcement distribution list. For us to be a successful professional bulletin, we depend on you, the reader. Please call or email me with any questions regarding article submissions or any other aspects of MIPB. We welcome your input and suggestions. Tracey A. Remus Editor October–December 2019 PB 34-19-4 Volume 45 Number 4 The views expressed in the following articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Departments of the Army or Defense, or the U.S. Government. Article content is not authenticated Army information and does not supercede information in any other Army publication. We want to express a sincere thank you to MAJ James H. McMillian, Jr., Directorate of Doctrine and Intelligence Systems Training execu- tive officer, for his active involvement as the “stakeholder” for this issue of MIPB. His subject matter expertise and collaboration were vital to the publication’s development process. FEATURES 7 ATP 2-01.3, Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield: Why the Update? by MAJ James H. McMillian, Jr. 10 An Excerpt from ATP 2-01.3, Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield 12 Decision Point Tactics: Intelligence Staffs’ Best Practices by CPT Jason R. Steimel and 1LT Evan Shields 23 Enemy Course of Action Development by MAJ Matthew Fontaine 28 Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield (Historical Reprint) by MAJ George A. Gaun 33 The History of Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield as We Consider Multi-Domain Operations and Cyberspace by Ms. Katherine R. Coviello 38 How Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield Led to One of the Greatest Military Upsets in History by CPT Jordan M. Peters 45 Tying It Together: The Battle Damage Assessment Challenge by 1LT Ashton Wolf 50 Role of the Military Intelligence Company Commander by CPT Ryan M. Hardin 57 The Application of Data Science in the Intelligence Warfighting Function by CPT Jason Boslaugh and Mr. Zachary Kendrick 64 Intelligence Architecture for Airborne Joint Forcible Entry Operations by CPT Matthew Yannitello 68 From Military Intelligence to the Caisson: Always Serving Others by 1SG David Scott DEPARTMENTS 2 Always Out Front 37 Doctrine Library 4 CSM Forum 69 Lessons Learned 5 Technical Perspective 74 Moments in MI History Inside back cover: Contact and Article Submission Information by Major General Laura A. Potter Commanding General U.S. Army Intelligence Center of Excellence Intelligence assists commanders in seeing thus, we must continue to man, train, through the fog and friction of war. and equip our MI formations for this —FM 2-0, Intelligence mission as we also build capacity for I am incredibly honored to take command large-scale ground combat operations of the U.S. Army Intelligence Center of and multi-domain operations. In multi- Excellence (USAICoE) and join a team of domain operations, our forces will face dedicated professionals committed to an extremely complex environment shaping the future of the Army. When across all domains. I first came through Fort Huachuca’s The National Defense Strategy outlines Buffalo Soldier Gate in August 1989, our the revisionist powers such as China doctrine, organization, tactics, materiel, and Russia, and the rogue regimes such and leadership were oriented on the as North Korea and Iran, in order to Soviet threat. In the decades after the emphasize the magnitude and caliber of fall of the Soviet Union, I served in units the threat. “We face an ever more lethal across the Army and the joint force while our Military and disruptive battlefield, combined across domains, and Intelligence (MI) Corps adapted to support conflicts conducted at increasing speed and reach—from close around the globe and, most significantly, the global war combat, throughout overseas theaters, and reaching to on terrorism. My recent tours as U.S. European Command our homeland.”2 The emphasis on the threat is linked to J-2 and U.S. Army Europe G-2 gave me great insights the emphasis on the importance of the joint force and into where the MI Corps and the Army must go to regain strong alliances. “To succeed in the emerging security our capability to support multi-domain operations with environment, our Department and Joint Force will intelligence to enable convergence at echelon. Multi- have to out-think, out-maneuver, out-partner, and out- domain operations includes the ability to “compete, innovate revisionist powers, rogue regimes, terrorists, penetrate, dis-integrate, and exploit our adversaries”1 and other threat actors.”3 The National Defense Strategy across all domains—air, land, maritime, space, cyberspace, outlines three lines of effort: the information environment, and the electromagnetic Ê Rebuild military readiness as we build a more lethal spectrum. I can think of no more important task at this joint force. point in our Nation’s history than to ensure our force is Ê modernized, trained, and ready in order to maintain a Strengthen alliances as we attract new partners. competitive edge. Ê Reform the Department’s business practices for 4 Our Army is shifting focus in order to prioritize capabilities greater performance and affordability. across the force that are required to conduct large-scale Building a more lethal force means capability, deter- ground combat operations and multi-domain operations. rence, and strength. We must have the capabilities to I specifically use the word prioritize rather than transition deter aggression and strengthen our forces and allied because our Army will continue to be called upon for limited relationships. Our number one priority as an Army is contingency operations, including counterinsurgency, readiness, and the team here at Fort Huachuca has been counterterrorism, and stability operations. The Army and ensuring readiness for our Soldiers by preparing for the the joint force have men and women in harm’s way on a shift to large-scale ground combat operations and in- daily basis in support of the counterterrorism fight, and creasing their lethality. We have adjusted our programs 2 Military Intelligence of instruction and implemented rigor into our daily train- This issue of Military Intelligence Professional Bulletin ing and tasks. For the officers, we have adjusted the length focuses on intelligence preparation of the battlefield, or of the courses in order to fit in more repetitions of intelli- IPB. However, “there is far more to intelligence analy- gence preparation of the battlefield (IPB) and the military sis than simply IPB. Intelligence analysis must support decision-making process (MDMP), provide demanding ex- the commander’s decisions, situational understanding, ams focused on analysis and both oral and written com- Army design methodology, MDMP, targeting, and force munication, and conduct more summative assessments. protection considerations and continuous operational The scenarios we
Load more

Recommended publications
  • England Airpark
    June 30, 2004 Mr. Albert F. Lowas Jr., Director Mr. Wayne Miller, Chairman of the Board Air Force Real Property Agency England Economic and Industrial AFRPA/DR Development District 1700 N. Moore St., Ste 2300 1611 Arnold Drive Arlington, VA 2209-2802 Alexandria, LA 71303-5636 Dear Messrs. Lowas and Miller: The Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ) and United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 6 together have determined that a portion of the former England Air Force Base, Alexandria, is Ready for Reuse. We congratulate you on this noteworthy accomplishment! Each agency would like to express their deepest appreciation to the Air Force Real Property Agency (AFRPA), and the England Economic and Industrial Development District (EEIDD), for their cooperation. A Ready for Reuse Determination is an acknowledgment by both agencies that environmental conditions on the property are protective of human health and the environment based on its current and anticipated future use. The subject of this Ready for Reuse Determination is the expanded golf course that encompasses a portion of the former England Air Force base. The Oakwing Golf Club is a public eighteen-hole course located along the scenic banks of Bayou Rapides and Bayou Le Tig. The expanded golf course is comprised of approximately 220 acres. Additionally, the course is a member of the prestigious “Audubon Golf Trail” and has recently completed construction of a new state-of-the-art clubhouse. One of the common goals of EEIDD, AFRPA, LDEQ, and EPA Region 6, is to make use of assets of the former base to offset the local economic impact of closure of the base.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Atomic Army, 1956-1960 Dissertation
    INTIMIDATING THE WORLD: THE UNITED STATES ATOMIC ARMY, 1956-1960 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Paul C. Jussel, B.A., M.M.A.S., M.S.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee Approved by Professor Allan R. Millett, Advisor Professor John R. Guilmartin __________________ Professor William R. Childs Advisor Department of History ABSTRACT The atomic bomb created a new military dynamic for the world in 1945. The bomb, if used properly, could replace the artillery fires and air-delivered bombs used to defeat the concentrated force of an enemy. The weapon provided the U.S. with an unparalleled advantage over the rest of the world, until the Soviet Union developed its own bomb by 1949 and symmetry in warfare returned. Soon, theories of warfare changed to reflect the belief that the best way to avoid the effects of the bomb was through dispersion of forces. Eventually, the American Army reorganized its divisions from the traditional three-unit organization to a new five-unit organization, dubbed pentomic by its Chief of Staff, General Maxwell D. Taylor. While atomic weapons certainly had an effect on Taylor’s reasoning to adopt the pentomic organization, the idea was not new in 1956; the Army hierarchy had been wrestling with restructuring since the end of World War II. Though the Korean War derailed the Army’s plans for the early fifties, it returned to the forefront under the Eisenhower Administration. The driving force behind reorganization in 1952 was not ii only the reoriented and reduced defense budget, but also the Army’s inroads to the atomic club, formerly the domain of only the Air Force and the Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • Huie Dellmon Regular Collection
    Huie Dellmon Regular Collection Item No. Subject and Description Date Place 403 Airplanes and crowd of people at airport 404 Air Circus at airport 1929 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 405 Wedell flying his butterfly in air races Baton Rouge, Louisiana 406 Crowds of people at air show 1929 Baton Rouge, city of 407 Air races at airport 1929 Baton Rouge, city of 409 Vapor trails from U. S. bombers over city Alexandria, Louisiana stand pipe 410 Vapor trails from U. S. bombers over city Alexandria, city of stand pipe 1192 Our air show with planes on port 1929 Baton Rouge, city of 1790 Jet Bomber flying at Army Day Show 35mm 8716 Pictures (very small) of a large glider overhead 5/17/1966 Pineville, Louisiana 1717 Aerial picture of aircraft carrier, Forrestal, planes on deck 376 Aerial view of upper part of town from plain farms and etc. 1861 Airplanes Jet F84 crashed in Pineville, LA. in June 1956 on or about 7:35 374 Large U. S. Airplane believed to have flown from Oklahoma camp and got lost out of Dallas, Texas, ran out of gas and landed on upper Third Street 375 Air show at airport Baton Rouge, Louisiana 386 Wrecked Ryan airplane at airport on lower Third Street, belonged to Wedell Williams Co. of Patterson, Louisiana; air service 1920's 388 Windsock for our airport on lower Third Street on Hudson property; not very successful 399 Wrecked Ryan airplane that hit a ditch on port, belongs to Weddell-Williams of Huie Dellmon Regular Collection Patterson, Louisiana 378 Two large B-50's flying low over city and river Alexandria, Louisiana 392 Old Bi-plane at airport 393 People at airport Baton Rouge, Louisiana 394 Parachute dropped at airport, in Enterprise Edition 395 People at airport 396 Large Ryan passenger plane moving on runway 397 Ryan passenger plane and pilot of Weddell Williams Company 398 Planes at airport 400 City Officials at grand opening of airport, lower Third St.
    [Show full text]
  • John L. Renne, Ph.D., AICP Professor of Urban and Regional Planning
    John L. Renne, Ph.D., AICP Professor of Urban and Regional Planning Director, Center for Urban and Environmental Solutions Department of Urban and Regional Planning College of Science Florida Atlantic University 777 Glades Rd., Building 44, Room 284 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 (561) 297-4281 [email protected] EDUCATION/EMPLOYMENT HISTORY Education Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, 2005 Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy PhD in Urban Planning and Policy Development Major Fields: Transportation and Land Use Planning University of Colorado at Denver, 2000 College of Architecture and Planning Master of Urban and Regional Planning (Outstanding Student) Concentration: Economic Development University of Colorado at Boulder, 1999 College of Architecture and Planning Bachelor of Environmental Design (with Honors) Major: Urban Planning and Design Minor: Economics Academic experience Florida Atlantic University, January 2016 – Present Department of Urban and Regional Planning, College of Science Professor, July 2020 – Present Associate Professor, January 2016 – June 2020 Coordinator, Undergraduate Programs, January 2016 – Present Director, Center for Urban and Environmental Solutions, March 2016 – Present Oxford University, April 2013 – December 2018 Transport Studies Unit, School of Geography and the Environment Oxford, United Kingdom Honorary Research Associate, August 2016 – December 2018 Senior Visiting Research Associate, April 2013 – August 2016 1 University of New Orleans, August 2005 – December 2015 Department
    [Show full text]
  • Webb, Jack OH222
    Wisconsin Veterans Museum Research Center Transcript of an Oral History Interview with JOHN A. WEBB Air Controller, Air Force, Career and Vietnam War. 1999 OH 222 OH 222 Webb, John (Jack) A., (1936- ). Oral History Interview, 1999. User Copy: 2 sound cassettes (ca. 78 min.), analog, 1 7/8 ips, mono. Master Copy: 1 sound cassette (ca. 78 min.), analog, 1 7/8 ips, mono. Transcript: 0.1 linear ft. (1 folder). Abstract: John "Jack" A. Webb, a Durand, Wisconsin native, discusses his career in the Air Force, including service in Asia during the Vietnam War and the Cold War. Webb mentions his family’s military history, enlisting in 1954, and his military training, including work with radar and with electronic countermeasure systems for B-47s. He touches on volunteering for Combat Control, going through jump school, and joining a team at Hurlburt Field (Florida) in 1963. Webb outlines his career and states he served in Laos and Nakhon Phanom (Thailand) between 1964 and 1966, as well as in Korea and in Japan after the USS Pueblo Incident. He discusses taking different types of Special Forces training, including jungle survival in Panama and infiltrating a CIA base. He speaks of “Operation Water Pump/Project 404”: living at Vang Pao’s secret headquarters at Long Tieng (Laos), duties as an air controller working in conjunction with the Laos military, and officially being a member of the U.S. Embassy rather than an Air Force employee. Webb expresses regret that when he went to Laos, little was known about Hmong culture and everyone called the Hmong a derogatory term without knowing better.
    [Show full text]
  • DONALD L POSS 23Rd Air Base Group Da Nang Air Base, Republic
    DONALD L POSS 23rd Air Base Group Da Nang Air Base, Republic of Vietnam [NOTE: the 23rd ABG replaced the 6222 Air Base Squadron on 8 July 1963 at Da Nang, and itself would be replaced by the 6252nd Tactical Fighter Wing in July 1965, and the 6252nd would be replaced by the 35th Tactical Fighter Wing in January 1966.] Extract, 23rd Air Base Group 1 July through 31 December 1963 Historical Data Record (AFHRA Call Number K-GP-AB-23-HI, Jul-Dec 1963, IRIS Number 437540): Page 2, Narrative: The 23rd Consolidated Aircraft Maintenance Squadron [was established by the same order that activated the 23rd CSG], with a resultant increase in the manpower authorization for the base. Heretofore all maintenance on assigned C-123B aircraft had been performed by TDY personnel from the 464th Troop Carrier Squadron, Pope AFB, North Carolina. It was not until October 1963 that the 23rd CAMRON really came into being. A very troublesome transition period developed between the departure of the TDY maintenance personnel and the influx of permanently assigned maintenance personnel. By the direction of Headquarters USAF, all TDY aircraft maintenance personnel were to return to the ZI [zone of interior] not later than 30 September 1963. The month of September arrived, necessitating booking and shipping arrangements to be made for the TDY personnel, but only very few replacements had arrived or were forecast to arrive. The result was that by the first of October, 23rd CAMRON and 2nd Air Division was faced with the decision of considerably reducing its operational capability or obtaining additional maintenance personnel from some other source within PACAF.
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-95-139 Military Bases B-261073
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee GAO on National Security, International Affairs, and Criminal Justice, Committee on Governmental Reform and Oversight, House of Representatives August 1995 MILITARY BASES Case Studies on Selected Bases Closed in 1988 and 1991 GAO/NSIAD-95-139 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-261073 August 15, 1995 The Honorable William H. Zeliff, Jr. Chairman, Subcommittee on National Security, International Affairs, and Criminal Justice Committee on Governmental Reform and Oversight House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: As part of an earlier review of 37 bases closed by the first two base realignment and closure rounds, we reported in late 1994 on expected revenues from land sales, resources requested from the federal government, and issues delaying reuse planning.1 As requested in your letter of March 21, 1995, we collected more recent information on reuse planning and implementation at the 37 bases. Specifically, we are providing updated summaries on the planned disposal and reuse of properties, successful conversions, problems that delay planning and implementation, and assistance provided to communities. We are also including a profile of each of the 37 installations in appendix III. Under current plans, over half of the land will be retained by the federal Results in Brief government because it (1) is contaminated with unexploded ordnance, (2) has been retained by decisions made by the base realignment and closure commissions or by legislation, or (3) is needed by federal agencies. Most of the remaining land will be requested by local reuse authorities under various public benefit transfer authorities or the new economic development conveyance authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 the EARLY MODERN BRIGADE, 1958-1972 Pentomic
    Chapter 6 THE EARLY MODERN BRIGADE, 1958-1972 Pentomic Era Following World War II, the US Army retained the organizational structures, with minor modifications, which had won that war. This organization—which did not include a maneuver unit called the brigade after the two brigades in the 1st Cavalry Division were eliminated in 1949—was also used to fight the Korean War in 1950-1953. Despite the success of the triangular infantry division in two wars, the Army radically changed the structure in 1958 by converting the infantry division to what became known as the Pentomic Division. Ostensively, the Pentomic structure was designed to allow infantry units to survive and fight on an atomic battlefield. Structurally it eliminated the regiment and battalion, replacing both with five self- contained “battlegroups,” each of which were larger than an old style battalion, but smaller than a regiment. A full colonel commanded the battlegroup and his captains commanded four, later five, subordinate rifle companies. The Pentomic Division structurally reflected that of the World War II European theater airborne divisions. This was no surprise since three European airborne commanders dominated the Army’s strategic thinking after the Korean War: Army Chief of Staff General Matthew Ridgway, Eighth Army commander General Maxwell Taylor, and VII Corps commander Lieutenant General James Gavin. Though theoretically triangular in design, the two airborne divisions Ridgway, Taylor, and Gavin commanded in the war, the 82d and 101st, fought as division task forces reinforced with additional parachute regiments and separate battalions. For most of the Northern European campaign, both divisions had two additional parachute regiments attached to them, giving them five subordinate regiments, each commanded by colonels.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Ausa Annual Meeting & Exposition
    PROGRAM 2017 AUSA ANNUAL MEETING & EXPOSITION A Professional Development Forum 9-11 OCTOBER 2017 Walter E. Washington Convention Center Washington, DC BUILDING READINESS America’s Army from the Great War to Multi-Domain Battle THANK YOU TO OUR SPONSORS The Association of the United States Army would like to thank the following sponsors for their generous support during the 2017 Annual Meeting. HHHTHREE STAR SPONSORS HHTWO STAR SPONSORS H ONE STAR SPONSORS ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY salutes the United States Army in its 242nd Year of Service to the Nation Welcome! The Association of the United States Army (AUSA) welcomes you to the 63rd AUSA Annual Meeting & Exposition, the largest land power exposition and professional development forum in North America. The Meeting will take place 9-11 October 2017 at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center in Washington, D.C. AUSA is a member-based, nonprofit professional organization proudly serving America’s Army and its supporters. If you have a connection with the Army—professionally or personally—AUSA is your resource for Soldier and family programs, educational resources, business opportunities, and more. Join us today at www.ausa.org/join. Location The 2017 AUSA Annual Meeting & Exposition is conveniently located in the heart of Washington, D.C. at the Walter E. Washington Convention Center, 801 Mt. Vernon Pl NW, Washington, D.C. 20001. The facility is metro accessible and offers 3000+ parking spots within a three-block radius. Security AUSA has added certain security measures that affect access to and movement within the Walter E. Washington Convention Center.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHICAL DATA BOO KK Class 2019-4 15
    BBIIOOGGRRAAPPHHIICCAALL DDAATTAA BBOOOOKK Class 2019-4 15 Jul - 16 Aug 2019 National Defense University NDU PRESIDENT Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge, USN 16th President Vice Admiral Fritz Roegge is an honors graduate of the University of Minnesota with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering and was commissioned through the Reserve Officers' Training Corps program. He earned a Master of Science in Engineering Management from the Catholic University of America and a Master of Arts with highest distinction in National Security and Strategic Studies from the Naval War College. He was a fellow of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Seminar XXI program. VADM Fritz Roegge, NDU President (Photo His sea tours include USS Whale (SSN 638), USS by NDU AV) Florida (SSBN 728) (Blue), USS Key West (SSN 722) and command of USS Connecticut (SSN 22). His major command tour was as commodore of Submarine Squadron 22 with additional duty as commanding officer, Naval Support Activity La Maddalena, Italy. Ashore, he has served on the staffs of both the Atlantic and the Pacific Submarine Force commanders, on the staff of the director of Naval Nuclear Propulsion, on the Navy staff in the Assessments Division (N81) and the Military Personnel Plans and Policy Division (N13), in the Secretary of the Navy's Office of Legislative Affairs at the U. S, House of Representatives, as the head of the Submarine and Nuclear Power Distribution Division (PERS 42) at the Navy Personnel Command, and as an assistant deputy director on the Joint Staff in both the Strategy and Policy (J5) and the Regional Operations (J33) Directorates.
    [Show full text]
  • Main Command Post-Operational Detachments
    C O R P O R A T I O N Main Command Post- Operational Detachments (MCP-ODs) and Division Headquarters Readiness Stephen Dalzell, Christopher M. Schnaubelt, Michael E. Linick, Timothy R. Gulden, Lisa Pelled Colabella, Susan G. Straus, James Sladden, Rebecca Jensen, Matthew Olson, Amy Grace Donohue, Jaime L. Hastings, Hilary A. Reininger, Penelope Speed For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2615 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0225-7 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report documents research and analysis conducted as part of a project entitled Multi- Component Units and Division Headquarters Readiness sponsored by U.S.
    [Show full text]