The Econometrics Journal Managing Editor’S Annual Report 2015 the Period Covered in This Report Is July 1 2014 Until June 30 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Econometrics Journal Managing Editor’S Annual Report 2015 the Period Covered in This Report Is July 1 2014 Until June 30 2015 Econometrics Journal, Editor’s Annual Report, 2015 The Royal Economic Society The Econometrics Journal Managing Editor’s Annual Report 2015 The period covered in this report is July 1 2014 until June 30 2015. The Econometrics Journal was established in 1998 refreshing and renewing the Associate Editors of by the Royal Economic Society with the original the journal. The recruitment of an Editorial intention of creating a high-quality refereed Board of international distinction is and has been journal with a standard of intellectual rigour and critical to raising the international profile and academic standing similar to those of the pre- academic standing of The Econometrics Journal. existing top international field journals for These editorial appointments underline and econometric research such as Econometric Theory, reinforce the original intention of the Royal Journal of Applied Econometrics, Journal of Business Economic Society of creating a high-quality ref- and Economic Statistics, Journal of Econometrics and ereed journal with a standard of intellectual Review of Economics and Statistics. rigour and academic standing similar to those of the pre-existing top international field journals The Econometrics Journal is a general journal for for econometric research. econometric research and included all areas of econometrics, whether applied, computational, The Econometrics Journal is grateful to Joris Pinkse methodological or theoretical contributions. As (Pennsylvania State University) who resigned as a journal of the Royal Economic Society, The an Associate Editor due to pressure of other Econometrics Journal seeks to promote the general commitments for the help and advice he provid- advancement and application of econometric ed to The Econometrics Journal. methods and techniques to problems of rele- The Econometrics Journal is also delighted that the vance to modern economics. following have agreed to continue for a further Editorial Board three year term as Associate Editors: Daniel Ackerberg (University of Michigan), Chunrong The Editorial Office of The Econometrics Journal is Ai (University of Florida), Joerg Breitung based in Faculty of Economics at the University (University of Bonn), Federico Bugni (Duke of Cambridge with Richard J Smith as Managing University), Ivan Canay (Northwestern Editor of The Econometrics Journal. University), Giuseppe Cavaliere (University of Recent editorial changes include the appoint- Bologna), John Chao (University of Maryland), ment of Dennis Kristensen (UCL, IFS and Yingying Fan (University of Southern Cemmap) as Co-Editor to replace Andrew California), Ivan Fernandez-Val (Boston Patton (Duke University) on his taking up the University), Silvia Goncalves (University of position of Managing Editor of Journal of Western Ontario), Stefan Hoderlein (Boston Financial Econometrics. Dennis has been an College), Shakeeb Khan (Duke University), Associate Editor of The Econometrics Journal since Tatiana Komarova, (London School of 2008 whereas Andrew was a Co-Editor between Economics), Ivana Komunjer (University of 2013 and 2015. The Econometrics Journal is very California, San Diego), Serena Ng (Columbia grateful to Andrew for his excellent service dur- University), Morten Nielsen (Queens ing his tenure as Co-Editor. University), Alexei Onatski (Universiity of Cambridge), Taisuke Otsu (Yale University), The Editorial Board of The Econometrics Journal Aureo de Paula (University College London; undertook at the end of 2014 its annual editori- PEN), Zhongjun Qu (Boston University), al review with the particular intention of Andres Santos, (University of California, San - 1 - Econometrics Journal, Editor’s Annual Report, 2015 Diego), Oliver Scaillet, (University of Geneva; cates that proportionately the number of submis- SFI), Susanne Schennach, (Brown University), sions attracted from North America by The Azeem Shaikh, (University of Chicago) and Econometrics Journal dropped relative to 2013-14 Gautam Tripathi, (University of Luxembourg). being rather similar to the historical level of ear- lier years. Consequently, The Econometrics Journal The full editorial membership is given in is still failing to attract the numbers and quality Appendix A below. of submission from North America required in order to achieve its aim of becoming a top inter- Progress national general journal for econometrics Impact factors research. The proportion of submissions from Europe is similar to that of previous years The sixth set of data from the ISI Citation Index whereas that from the UK rose substantially. on The Econometrics Journal became available for Table 2 underlines the continuing predominance 2014.The journal impact factor is 0.818 (1.128, of acceptances originating from North America, 1.000, 0.870, 0.691, 0.733, 0.750, 0.479) with UK and Europe although there is evidence of an the immediacy index at 0.095 (0.364, 0.227, increase from the rest of the world. 0.240, 0.176, 0.125, 0.065, 0.034); 2007-13 data are given in parentheses. The eigen-factor Wiley-Blackwell prepared marketing informa- score and five year impact factor are 0.00415 tion for the RES 2015 Conference (leaflets, (0.00377, 0.00417, 0.00280, 0.00352, posters, highlighted key papers) and pho- 0.00367, 0.00324, 0.00379) and 1.488 (1.235, tographed the Wiley-Blackwell stand and the 1.252, 0.964, 1.166) respectively; 2008-13 and Denis Sargan Prize award. An email blast was 2010-13 figures respectively in parentheses.The sent to the Wiley-Blackwell opt-in lists to join journal impact factor ranks The Econometrics The Econometrics Journal stand at the RES 2015 Journal at 175 (112) out of 333 (333) economics conference granting immediate access to The journals. Econometrics Journal and included an invitation to The Econometrics Journal Special Session on Both journal impact factor and immediacy index ‘Econometrics of Matching’. The Econometrics have disappointingly dropped substantially as Journal was also promoted by Wiley-Blackwell compared with the gentle increases in recent with free sample issues, trial cards and leaflets at years, the former primarily due to the excellent a number of events worldwide. 2011 being omitted. More encouraging are the eigen-factor score and five year impact factor Wiley-Blackwell has yet to report on how they with the latter the highest ever recorded and intend to promote The Econometrics Journal at placing The Econometrics Journal at 117 (149) out Econometric Society meetings and other meet- of 333 (333) economics journals.The impact fac- ings of econometricians.The Editorial Board of tor and rank for the competitor journals are The Econometrics Journal has requested Wiley- rather similar to 2013: Econometric Theory 1.262 Blackwell to provide an annual list of such pro- (103), Journal of Econometrics 1.600 (64), Review motional activities in advance for each year. The of Economics and Statistics 2.749 (22), Journal of Econometrics Journal prefers an active rather than Applied Econometrics 1.673 (60) and Journal of reactive rôle in contributing to the preparation Business and Economic Statistics 2.241 (37). of resources for conferences and marketing cam- paigns. The short-term figures give cause for concern although it is likely the 2015 impact factor The Econometrics Journal now prepares and pub- should improve in 2015 as the rather poor 2012 lishes Winter and Summer Newsletters. Issues will be omitted. Nos. 3 and 4 have been distributed to RES mem- bers, The Econometrics Journal email database and Promotion various Wiley-Blackwell e-mail databases. Table 1 displays the geographical distribution of Newsletters are posted on The Econometrics new submissions for 2014-15. This table indi- Journal website and accessed from the left hand - 2 - Econometrics Journal, Editor’s Annual Report, 2015 menu of The Econometrics Journal home page with Special Session on ‘Heterogeneity’ at the RES twelve news items also posted announcing spe- Annual Conference 2013 held at Royal Holloway cial events. University of London. Submissions have also been received from the presenters Jianqing Fan The Denis Sargan Econometrics Prize (Princeton University) and Marc Hallin The Econometrics Journal Denis Sargan (ECARES ULB and ORFE Princeton) arising Econometrics Prize is awarded for the best from The Econometrics Journal Special Session on (unsolicited) article published in The Econometrics Large Dimensional Models at the RES Annual Journal in a given year by anyone who is within Conference 2014 at the University of five years of being awarded their doctorate. An Manchester. honorarium of £1000 will be awarded to the winning author. The Econometrics Journal organized a Special Session on ‘Econometrics of Matching’ at the The Econometrics Journal Editorial Board 2014 Royal Economic Society Annual (Managing Editor and Co-Editors) evaluated Conference, Monday 30 March to Wednesday 1 those qualifying articles published in The April, 2015 at the University of Manchester. Econometrics Journal in 2013 and the prize was awarded to Professor Koen Jochmans (Sciences The papers presented were: Po). The award to Professor Jochmans is in Alfred Galichon (Sciences Po): ‘Estimating respect of his paper ‘Pairwise-comparison estima- Transfer Frictions in the Marriage Market’ tion with non-parametric controls’ published in The Econometrics Journal,Vol. 16, Issue No. 3, pp. Jeremy Lise (UCL and IFS): ‘Multidimensional 340-372, and available at: http://onlinelibrary. Skills, Sorting and Human Dimension wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ectj.12008/abstract Calculation’.
Recommended publications
  • Measurement Systems
    Measurement systems Susanne Schennach The Institute for Fiscal Studies Department of Economics, UCL cemmap working paper CWP12/21 Measurement systems Susanne Schennach∗ Brown University March 6, 2021 Abstract Economic models often depend on quantities that are unobservable, either for privacy reasons or because they are difficult to measure. Examples of such variables include human capital (or ability), personal income, unobserved het- erogeneity (such as consumer “types”), etc. This situation has historically been handled either by simply using observable imperfect proxies for each the unob- servables, or by assuming that such unobservables satisfy convenient conditional mean or independence assumptions that enable their elimination from the esti- mation problem. However, thanks to tremendous increases in both the amount of data available and computing power, it has become possible to take full advan- tage of recent formal methods to infer the statistical properties of unobservable variables from multiple imperfect measurements of them. The general framework used is the concept of measurement systems in which a vector of observed variables is expressed as a (possibly nonlinear or nonparamet- ric) function of a vector of all unobserved variables (including unobserved error terms or “disturbances” that may have non additively separable affects). The framework emphasizes important connections with related fields, such as non- linear panel data, limited dependent variables, game theoretic models, dynamic models and set-identification. This review reports the progress made towards the central question of whether there exist plausible assumptions under which one can identify the joint distribution of the unobservables from the knowledge of the joint distribution of the observables. It also overviews empirical efforts aimed at exploiting such identification results to deliver novel findings that for- mally account for the unavoidable presence of unobservables.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Capital Development Before Age Five
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES HUMAN CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT BEFORE AGE FIVE Douglas Almond Janet Currie Working Paper 15827 http://www.nber.org/papers/w15827 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 March 2010 We thank Maya Rossin and David Munroe for excellent research assistance, participants in the Berkeley Handbook of Labor Economics Conference in November 2009 for helpful comments, and Christine Pal and Hongyan Zhao for proofreading the equations. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2010 by Douglas Almond and Janet Currie. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Human Capital Development Before Age Five Douglas Almond and Janet Currie NBER Working Paper No. 15827 March 2010, Revised January 2011 JEL No. I12,I21,J13,J24,Q53 ABSTRACT This chapter seeks to set out what Economists have learned about the effects of early childhood influences on later life outcomes, and about ameliorating the effects of negative influences. We begin with a brief overview of the theory which illustrates that evidence of a causal relationship between a shock in early childhood and a future outcome says little about whether the relationship in question biological or immutable.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Peer Effects Among Children in Rural India
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Helmers, Christian; Patnam, Manasa Conference Paper Does the Rotten Child Spoil His Companion? Spatial Peer Effects Among Children in Rural India Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011, No. 40 Provided in Cooperation with: Research Committee on Development Economics (AEL), German Economic Association Suggested Citation: Helmers, Christian; Patnam, Manasa (2011) : Does the Rotten Child Spoil His Companion? Spatial Peer Effects Among Children in Rural India, Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011, No. 40, ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Kiel und Hamburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57928 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report Grant ID INO1100038
    Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Global Working Group Progress Report Grant ID INO1100038 July 6, 2012 PROGRESS REPORT 2 HUMCAP OVERVIEW 6 Human Capital and Economic Opportunity MEMBERS 17 Global Working Group WORKING GROUPS 28 WORKING PAPERS 37 Table of Contents EVENTS 57 CONFERENCE SUMMARIES 109 WEBCONFERENCES 149 DISSEMINATION 164 CONTACT INFORMATION 182 www.hceconomics.org Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Global Working Group Progress Report Interim Progress Report of the Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Global Working Group July 2012 (1) Is the Project on track to be completed within the time frame of the Grant? Yes; we have made much progress over the last 6-months. This report outlines our recent and upcoming activities. (2) If not, what are obstacles or challenges impacting the time line? While we have made much progress, our primary obstacle is scheduling events given the busy schedules of working group leaders and members. However, conference call and webinar technology has helped resolve this challenge. As previously noted, due to cost-sharing with the Becker Friedman Institute for Research in Economics, as well as co-sponsorship of events, our spending has been slower than anticipated. For this reason, we expect to request a no-cost extension closer to the end of the award (12/2013). (3) Is the work developing as anticipated? Yes; the work is developing better than expected given our ambitious, long-term goals. Our accomplishments include 18 conferences, workshops, and webinars that have brought together disparate thinkers to address fundamental inequality issues. (Further detail on these activities can be found in the report.) Further, we have 54 working papers that have been viewed 1,724 times, and downloaded 1,127 times.
    [Show full text]
  • Essays in the Economics of Education
    Essays in the Economics of Education by Brian Christopher Clark Department of Economics Duke University Date: Approved: Peter Arcidiacono, Supervisor Arnaud Maurel V. Joseph Hotz Seth Sanders Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Economics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2016 Abstract Essays in the Economics of Education by Brian Christopher Clark Department of Economics Duke University Date: Approved: Peter Arcidiacono, Supervisor Arnaud Maurel V. Joseph Hotz Seth Sanders An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Economics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2016 Copyright c 2016 by Brian Christopher Clark All rights reserved except the rights granted by the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial Licence Abstract This dissertation is comprised of three essays in the economics of education. In the first essay, I examine how college students' major choice and major switching behavior responds to major-specific labor market shocks. The second essay explores the incidence and persistence of overeducation for workers in the United States. The final essay examines the role that students' cognitive and non-cognitive skills play in their transition from secondary to postsecondary education, and how the effect of these skills are moderated by race, gender, and socioeconomic status. iv To my loved ones: for always supporting me v Contents Abstract iv List of Tables ix List of Figures xi Acknowledgements xii 1 Introduction1 2 Shocked out of Your Major: Do Labor Market Shocks Prompt Ma- jor Switching?4 2.1 Labor market shocks..........................
    [Show full text]
  • Stochastic Revealed Preferences with Measurement Error∗
    Stochastic Revealed Preferences with Measurement Error∗ Victor H. Aguiar† Nail Kashaev† [email protected] [email protected] First version received April 2018; Final version accepted June 2020. Abstract A long-standing question about consumer behavior is whether individu- als’ observed purchase decisions satisfy the revealed preference (RP) axioms of the utility maximization theory (UMT). Researchers using survey or experimental panel data sets on prices and consumption to answer this question face the well-known problem of measurement error. We show that ignoring measurement error in the RP approach may lead to overrejection of the UMT. To solve this problem, we pro- pose a new statistical RP framework for consumption panel data sets that allows for testing the UMT in the presence of measurement error. Our test is applicable to all consumer models that can be characterized by their first-order conditions. Our approach is nonparametric, allows for unrestricted heterogeneity in preferences, and requires only a centering condition on measurement error. We develop two applica- tions that provide new evidence about the UMT. First, we find support in a survey data set for the dynamic and time-consistent UMT in single-individual households, in the presence of nonclassical measurement error in consumption. In the second ap- plication, we cannot reject the static UMT in a widely used experimental data set in which measurement error in prices is assumed to be the result of price misperception due to the experimental design. The first finding stands in contrast to the conclu- sions drawn from the deterministic RP test of Browning (1989). The second finding reverses the conclusions drawn from the deterministic RP test of Afriat (1967) and Varian (1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Economics in Action : Issue 4 : May 3, 2011 : Home
    Economics in Action : Issue 4 : May 3, 2011 : Home ISSUE 4 : MAY 3, 2011 Welcome to this edition of “Economics in Grace Chui-Miller Alumni Spotlight Action.” Ready to Compete in Any Arena Chair’s Corner STUDENT RESEARCH Valuing Research Two Trips to Omaha: Meeting Warren Buffet and the Global Investment Economics Leadership Council Set Research Challenge to Break New Ground Exploring Motivations and Tools That The department partners with alumni and business leaders Encourage Giving to work on new projects and initiatives. Halbert White Jr. FACULTY SPOTLIGHT: HALBERT WHITE JR. My Journey to My Journey to UC San Diego UC San Diego » Job Market Proves Strong Pioneer in the Field of Econometrics for Our Doctorates Pioneer in the Field of FEATURE ARTICLES Despite the challenging conditions, our candidates had Econometrics » Is There a Tiger Mother Effect? superb outcomes. Economics Leadership Council Set to Break New Ground Job Market Proves Strong for Our Faculty in the News Doctorates Radical, Religious, and Violent: The New Economics of Past Issues Read what our undergraduate and graduate Terrorism SUBSCRIBE students have been up to. “A Century of Work and Leisure” wins American Economic Journal Macroeconomics Best Paper Award Name: Unraveling the mystery of why we give, or don’t Email: Oil Prices Won’t Kill the Recovery Pumped Up? Altruism Alert: Just Ask Secondary Sources: Crisis Causes, Charity, Facebook’s Iron Curtain Valuing Research The Capitol’s Charity Case Two Trips to Omaha: Meeting Warren Fan Rage: How Home Team Losses Contribute
    [Show full text]
  • Heterogeneity and Selection in Dynamic Panel Data
    Heterogeneity and Selection in Dynamic Panel Data Yuya Sasaki∗ Brown University Job Market Paper November 22, 2011 Abstract This paper shows nonparametric identification of dynamic panel data models with nonseparable heterogeneity and dynamic selection by nonparametrically differencing out these two sources of bias. For T = 3, the model is identified by using a proxy variable. For T = 6, the three additional periods construct the proxy to establish identification. As a consequence of these identification results, a constrained maximum likelihood criterion follows, which corrects for selection and allows for one-step estimation. Applying this method, I investigate whether SES affects adult mortality. The method circumvents the survivorship bias and accounts for unobserved heterogeneity. I find that employment has protective effects on survival for the male adults in the NLS Original Cohorts: Older Men. Keywords: constrained maximum likelihood, dynamic panel, selection, nonparametric differencing, nonseparable heterogeneity ∗ Email: yuya [email protected]. I am indebted to Frank Kleibergen for generous support and guidance. I am also thankful to Stefan Hoderlein for continuous guidance throughout my dissertation. Ken Chay, Blaise Melly, Eric Renault, and Susanne Schennach have graciously provided advice and feedback. Anna Aizer has provided advice on the empirical application. I have benefited from discussions and comments by Joseph Altonji, Jinyong Hahn, Christian Hansen, Keisuke Hirano, Yingyao Hu, Dennis Kristensen, Arthur Lewbel, Till von Wachter, and seminar participants at Boston College, Brown University, Econometric Society Asian Meeting in Seoul, Econometric Society North American Summer Meeting in St. Louis, and International Panel Data Conference in Montr´eal.The Merit Dissertation Fellowships from Brown University are greatly acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Flávio Cunha Department of Economics And
    Curriculum Vitae Flávio Cunha Department of Economics and Texas Policy Lab Rice University Houston, TX 77251-1892 Telephone: 713-348-3312 E-mail: [email protected] Education: June/2007 – PhD (Economics) at the University of Chicago, Chicago, USA. June/2000 – M.Sc. (Economics) at Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. February/1995 – BA (Economics) at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Employment: July 2019 – Ervin Kenneth Zigler Professor, Rice University. July/2017 – June/2019 - Professor, Rice University. July/2014 – June/2017 - Associate Professor, Rice University. July/2008 – June/2014 - Assistant Professor, University of Pennsylvania. July/2007 – June/2008 - Lecturer, University of Pennsylvania. Published and Forthcoming Papers: The Econometrics of Early Childhood Human Capital and Investments, with Eric Nielsen and Benjamin Williams, accepted for publication with minor revisions, Annual Review of Economics. You are What Your Parents Think: Height and Local Reference Points, with Fan Wang, Esteban Puentes, and Jere Behrman, accepted for publication with minor revisions, Journal of Econometrics. Maternal Subjective Expectations about the Technology of Skill Formation Predict Investments in Children One Year Later, with Irma Elo and Jennifer Culhane, In Press, Journal of Econometrics. Persistence and Fade-Out of Educational-Intervention Effects: Mechanisms and Potential Solutions, with Drew Bailey, Greg Duncan, Barbara Foorman, and David Yeager, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Vol. 21(2), pp. 55-97. Early Life Height and Weight Production Functions with Endogenous Energy and Protein Inputs, (with Jere Behrman, Linda Adair, Judith Borja, John Hoddinott, John Maluccio, Reynaldo Martorell, Esteban Puentes, Aryeh Stein, and Fan Wang), Vol. 22(2), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty Honors and Awards 03-01-2021
    Economics Faculty Academic Honors and Awards Kerry Back J. Howard Creekmore Professor of Finance and Professor of Economics, 2014. Charles River Associates Award for the Best Paper on Corporate Finance, Western Finance Association, 2014. Executive Masters in Manufacturing Management Reid Teaching Award, Olin School of Business, 2001. Executive M.B.A. Reid Teaching Award, Olin School of Business, 1997, 1999. Professional M.B.A. Reid Teaching Award, Olin School of Business, 1998. Jones Graduate School of Business Scholarship Excellence Award, 2013. Mays Business School Outstanding Research Award, 2007. Kentucky Economic Association Distinguished Economist, 2000. Washington University Distinguished Faculty Member, 1999. Michael J. Brennan Best Paper Award, Review of Financial Studies, Society of Financial Studies, 1993. Batterymarch Fellow, 1991-92. Maria Bejan Malcolm Gillis Award for Distinction in Undergraduate Teaching in Economics, RISE (Rice Initiative for the Study of Economics), 2019. Excellence in Teaching Award, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM) Business School, 2006-2010. MBA Excellence in Teaching Award, ITAM, Mexico, 2006-2010. Excellence in Teaching Award, Department of Economics, University of Carlos III de Madrid, 2001-2002. Michele Biavati Malcolm Gillis Award for Distinction in Undergraduate Teaching in Economics, RISE (Rice Initiative for the Study of Economics), 2020. Award for Excellence in Teaching, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM), 2008- 2010. Nina Bokova Teaching Award: 1st prize among all compulsory undergraduate courses, University of Bonn, 2015 Teaching Award: 1st prize in the course “Introduction to Microeconomics,” University of Bonn, 2015 Bryan (Bill) Brown Reginald Henry Hargrove Professor of Economics, 1992. James Brown George R. Brown Certificate of Highest Merit, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Capital Development and Parental Investment in India.∗
    Human Capital Development and Parental Investment in India.∗ Orazio Attanasio,y Costas Meghirz and Emily Nix§ January 23, 2020 Abstract We estimate production functions for cognition and health for children aged 1-12 in India, based on the Young Lives Survey. India has over 70 million children aged 0-5 who are at risk of developmental deficits. The inputs into the production functions include parental background, prior child cognition and health, and child investments, which are taken as endogenous. Estimation is based on a nonlinear factor model, based on multiple measurements for both inputs and child outcomes. Our results show an important effect of early health on child cognitive development, which then becomes persistent. Parental investments affect cognitive development at all ages, but more so for younger children. Investments also have an impact on health at early ages only. ∗We thank the editor Michèle Tertilt, five anonymous referees, Joseph Altonji, Richard Blundell, Teodora Boneva, Sarah Cattan, Flavio Cunha, James Heckman, Corina Mommaerts, Susanne Schennach and Matthew Wiswall for their useful comments and discussions; we are greatly indebted to Young Lives for generously sharing their data with us. Orazio Attanasio was partially financed by the ESRC Professorial Fellowship ES/K010700/1 and by the European Research Council Advanced Grants 249612. We acknowl- edge the funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under grant agreement number 695300 - HKADeC. Costas Meghir thanks NIH for funding under grant R01 HD072120 as well as the Cowles foun- dation and the ISPS at Yale for financial assistance. Emily Nix obtained funding from an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES ESTIMATING THE TECHNOLOGY OF COGNITIVE AND NONCOGNITIVE SKILL FORMATION Flavio Cunha James Heckman Susanne Schennach WORKING PAPER 15664 http://www.nber.org/papers/w15664 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 February 2010 This paper was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (SES-0241858, SES- 0099195, SES-0452089, SES-0752699); the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD43411); the J. B. and M. K. Pritzker Foundation; the Susan Buffett Foundation; the American Bar Foundation; the Children's Initiative, a project of the Pritzker Family Foundation at the Harris School of Public Policy Studies at the University of Chicago; and PAES, supported by the Pew Foundation, as well as the National Institutes of Health|National Institute on Aging (P30 AG12836), the Boettner Center for Pensions and Retirement Security and the NICHD R24 HD-0044964 at the University of Pennsylvania. We thank the editor and three anonymous referees for very helpful comments. We have also benefited from comments received from Orazio Attanasio, Gary Becker, Sarah Cattan, Philipp Eisenhauer, Miriam Gensowski, Jeffrey Grogger, Lars Hansen, Chris Hansman, Kevin Murphy, Petra Todd, Ben Williams, Ken Wolpin, and Junjian Yi, as well as from participants at the Yale Labor/Macro Conference (May 2006), University of Chicago Applications Workshop (June 2006), the New York University Applied Microeconomics Workshop (March 2008), the University of Indiana Macroeconomics
    [Show full text]