DOCSLIB.ORG

Faculty Honors and Awards 03-01-2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Faculty Honors and Awards 03-01-2021 Economics Faculty Academic Honors and Awards Kerry Back J. Howard Creekmore Professor of Finance and Professor of Economics, 2014. Charles River Associates Award for the Best Paper on Corporate Finance, Western Finance Association, 2014. Executive Masters in Manufacturing Management Reid Teaching Award, Olin School of Business, 2001. Executive M.B.A. Reid Teaching Award, Olin School of Business, 1997, 1999. Professional M.B.A. Reid Teaching Award, Olin School of Business, 1998. Jones Graduate School of Business Scholarship Excellence Award, 2013. Mays Business School Outstanding Research Award, 2007. Kentucky Economic Association Distinguished Economist, 2000. Washington University Distinguished Faculty Member, 1999. Michael J. Brennan Best Paper Award, Review of Financial Studies, Society of Financial Studies, 1993. Batterymarch Fellow, 1991-92. Maria Bejan Malcolm Gillis Award for Distinction in Undergraduate Teaching in Economics, RISE (Rice Initiative for the Study of Economics), 2019. Excellence in Teaching Award, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM) Business School, 2006-2010. MBA Excellence in Teaching Award, ITAM, Mexico, 2006-2010. Excellence in Teaching Award, Department of Economics, University of Carlos III de Madrid, 2001-2002. Michele Biavati Malcolm Gillis Award for Distinction in Undergraduate Teaching in Economics, RISE (Rice Initiative for the Study of Economics), 2020. Award for Excellence in Teaching, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM), 2008- 2010. Nina Bokova Teaching Award: 1st prize among all compulsory undergraduate courses, University of Bonn, 2015 Teaching Award: 1st prize in the course “Introduction to Microeconomics,” University of Bonn, 2015 Bryan (Bill) Brown Reginald Henry Hargrove Professor of Economics, 1992. James Brown George R. Brown Certificate of Highest Merit, 2018. Minnie Stevens Piper Foundation Piper Professor Award, 2018. George R. Brown Award for Excellence in Teaching, 2009, 2017. George R. Brown Award for Superior Teaching, 2004, 2006, 2007, 2013. Sarah A. Burnett Teaching Prize in the Social Sciences, 2010. H. Gregg Lewis Prize (best paper published in the Journal of Labor Economics over a two-year period, with Aubrey Light), 1993 Rossella Calvi Ralph O’Connor Award for Distinction in Teaching and Research in Economics, RISE (Rice Initiative for the Study of Economics), 2020. UWIN Best Paper Award on Gender Economics, UniCredit and Universities Foundation, 2016. Donald J. White Teaching Excellence Award, Boston College, 2014. Amelie Carlton Sarah A. Burnett Teaching Prize in the Social Sciences, 2019. 2 Malcolm Gillis Award for Distinction in Undergraduate Teaching in Economics, RISE (Rice Initiative for the Study of Economics), 2017. Highest Ranking Teacher, Bauer College of Business, University of Houston, 2011-2013. Maura Coughlin Anindya (Bappu) Majumder ’98 Memorial Prize for Excellence in Teaching, Cornell University, 2019. Ernest Liu Family Outstanding Teaching Award, Cornell University, 2018. L.R. “Red" Wilson Excellence in Economics Medal, Cornell University 2016. Flávio Cunha Ervin K. Zingler Chair of Economics, 2019. Ralph O’Connor Award for Distinction in Teaching and Research in Economics, RISE (Rice Initiative for the Study of Economics), 2017. Frisch Medal (best paper published in Econometrica over a five-year period, awarded every two years, with James Heckman and Susanne Schennach), Econometric Society, 2014. Irving B. Kravis Prize for Distinction in Undergraduate Teaching (University of Pennsylvania), 2010. James DeNicco Nicholas Salgo Outstanding Teaching Award, 2018. Sarah A. Burnett Teaching Prize in the Social Sciences, 2018. Malcolm Gillis Award for Distinction in Undergraduate Teaching in Economics, RISE (Rice Initiative for the Study of Economics), 2016. Mahmoud El-Gamal Chair of Islamic Economics, Finance and Management, 1998. Hülya Eraslan Excellence in Refereeing Award, American Economic Review, 2016, 2018. Panelist, National Science Foundation, 2015, 2016. Ralph O’Connor Professor, 2015. Jeremy Fox Shatto Endowed Chair of Economics, Rice University Economics Department, 2020. 3 Panelist, National Science Foundation, 2019, 2020. Excellence in Refereeing Award, American Economic Review, 2012. Peter Hartley George A. Peterkin Chair, 2019. George and Cynthia Mitchell Chair in Sustainable Development, 2007-2019. Campbell Watkins Award (best paper published in the Energy Journal), International Association for Energy Economics, 2016. President, International Association for Energy Economics, 2015. President, U.S. Association for Energy Economics, 2012. Senior Fellow Award, U.S. Association for Energy Economics, 2011. Best paper published in Economic Record, Economic Society of Australia and New Zealand, 1993. Yinghua He Best paper published in the American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, 2019. Young Researcher in Economics Prize, La Fondation Banque de France, 2014. Vivian Ho Elected to the National Academy of Medicine, 2020. Justin F. Kimball Patient Protection Award, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas, 2018. Healthcare Advocacy Award, Doctors for Change, Houston, Texas, 2017. Article of the Year Award: Policy Category, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, 2016. James A. Baker III Institute Chair in Health Economics, 2004. Finalist, Teacher of the Year, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 2001, 2004. Yunmi Kong Malcolm Gillis Award for Distinction in Undergraduate Teaching in Economics, RISE (Rice Initiative for the Study of Economics), 2018. Ted Loch-Temzelides George and Cynthia Mitchell Chair in Sustainable Development, 2019. 4 Collegiate Teaching Award, Henry B. Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, 1999. Mallesh Pai Best paper published in the American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, 2020. Ralph O’Connor Award for Distinction in Teaching and Research in Economics, RISE (Rice Initiative for the Study of Economics), 2018. Irving B. Kravis Prize for Distinction in Undergraduate Teaching (University of Pennsylvania), 2015. Isabelle Perrigne Arnold Zellner Award (best paper on theoretical econometrics published in the Journal of Econometrics), 2003. Robin Sickles Ralph O’Connor Award for Distinction in Teaching and Research in Economics, RISE (Rice Initiative for the Study of Economics), 2019. Reginald Henry Hargrove Chair in Economics, 2008. All Star Papers for 1989-1999, Journal of Econometrics. Graduate Student Association Mentoring Award, Rice University, 1998. Xun Tang Henry S. Fox Sr. Chair of Economics, 2019. Honorable Mention, Zellner Thesis Award in Business and Economic Statistics, 2009. Matt Thirkettle Ernest Liu Family Outstanding Teaching Award, Cornell University, 2018. L.R. “Red” Wilson MA ‘67 Excellence in Economics Medal, Cornell University, 2016. Tapan Mitra Economics Prize, Cornell University, 2016. George Zodrow Steven D. Gold Award (contributions to state and local public finance in research and public policy making), National Tax Association, 2009. Allyn R. and Gladys M. Cline Chair of Economics, 2007. 5 Outstanding Doctoral Dissertation in Government Finance and Taxation, National Taxation Association, 1980. __________________________________________________________________________________ 6 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Measurement Systems
    Measurement systems Susanne Schennach The Institute for Fiscal Studies Department of Economics, UCL cemmap working paper CWP12/21 Measurement systems Susanne Schennach∗ Brown University March 6, 2021 Abstract Economic models often depend on quantities that are unobservable, either for privacy reasons or because they are difficult to measure. Examples of such variables include human capital (or ability), personal income, unobserved het- erogeneity (such as consumer “types”), etc. This situation has historically been handled either by simply using observable imperfect proxies for each the unob- servables, or by assuming that such unobservables satisfy convenient conditional mean or independence assumptions that enable their elimination from the esti- mation problem. However, thanks to tremendous increases in both the amount of data available and computing power, it has become possible to take full advan- tage of recent formal methods to infer the statistical properties of unobservable variables from multiple imperfect measurements of them. The general framework used is the concept of measurement systems in which a vector of observed variables is expressed as a (possibly nonlinear or nonparamet- ric) function of a vector of all unobserved variables (including unobserved error terms or “disturbances” that may have non additively separable affects). The framework emphasizes important connections with related fields, such as non- linear panel data, limited dependent variables, game theoretic models, dynamic models and set-identification. This review reports the progress made towards the central question of whether there exist plausible assumptions under which one can identify the joint distribution of the unobservables from the knowledge of the joint distribution of the observables. It also overviews empirical efforts aimed at exploiting such identification results to deliver novel findings that for- mally account for the unavoidable presence of unobservables.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Capital Development Before Age Five
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES HUMAN CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT BEFORE AGE FIVE Douglas Almond Janet Currie Working Paper 15827 http://www.nber.org/papers/w15827 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 March 2010 We thank Maya Rossin and David Munroe for excellent research assistance, participants in the Berkeley Handbook of Labor Economics Conference in November 2009 for helpful comments, and Christine Pal and Hongyan Zhao for proofreading the equations. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2010 by Douglas Almond and Janet Currie. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Human Capital Development Before Age Five Douglas Almond and Janet Currie NBER Working Paper No. 15827 March 2010, Revised January 2011 JEL No. I12,I21,J13,J24,Q53 ABSTRACT This chapter seeks to set out what Economists have learned about the effects of early childhood influences on later life outcomes, and about ameliorating the effects of negative influences. We begin with a brief overview of the theory which illustrates that evidence of a causal relationship between a shock in early childhood and a future outcome says little about whether the relationship in question biological or immutable.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.How to Do Empirical Economics
    Investigaciones Económicas ISSN: 0210-1521 [email protected] Fundación SEPI España Kramarz, Francis; Angrist, Joshua D.; Blau, David M.; Falk, Armin; Robin, Jean-Marc; Taber, Christopher R. How to do empirical economics Investigaciones Económicas, vol. XXX, núm. 2, mayo, 2006, pp. 179-206 Fundación SEPI Madrid, España Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=17330202 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto JOSHUA.qxd 25/04/2006 9:51 PÆgina 179 investigaciones económicas. vol. XXX (2), 2006, 179-206 HOW TO DO EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS FRANCIS KRAMARZ (Editor) INSEE JOSHUA D. ANGRIST MIT DAVID M. BLAU University of North Carolina ARMIN FALK University of Bonn JEAN-MARC ROBIN Université de Paris 1 CHRISTOPHER R. TABER Northwestern University This article presents a discussion among leading economists on how to do empirical research in economics. The participants discuss their reasons for starting research projects, data base construction, the methods they use, the role of theory, and their views on the main alternative empirical approaches. The article ends with a discussion of a set of articles which exemplify best practice in empirical work. Keywords: Empirical research, econometric methods. (JEL B4, C5, C8, C9) 1. Introductory note by the Guest Editor I was asked by INVESTIGACIONES ECONÓMICAS to organize a discussion between leading empirical economists on “How to do empi- rical economics”. In fact, the questions they answered were all address- ing a more personal issue: “how do you practise your empirics”.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Peer Effects Among Children in Rural India
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Helmers, Christian; Patnam, Manasa Conference Paper Does the Rotten Child Spoil His Companion? Spatial Peer Effects Among Children in Rural India Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011, No. 40 Provided in Cooperation with: Research Committee on Development Economics (AEL), German Economic Association Suggested Citation: Helmers, Christian; Patnam, Manasa (2011) : Does the Rotten Child Spoil His Companion? Spatial Peer Effects Among Children in Rural India, Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin 2011, No. 40, ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft, Kiel und Hamburg This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/57928 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Nobel Autobiography Angus Deaton, Princeton, February 2016 Scotland
    Nobel Autobiography Angus Deaton, Princeton, February 2016 Scotland I was born in Edinburgh, in Scotland, a few days after the end of the Second World War. Both my parents had left school at a very young age, unwillingly in my father’s case. Yet both had deep effects on my education, my father influencing me toward measurement and mathematics, and my mother toward writing and history. The school in the Yorkshire mining village in which my father grew up in the 1920s and 1930s allowed only a few children to go to high school, and my father was not one of them. He spent much of his time as a young man repairing this deprivation, mostly at night school. In his village, teenagers could go to evening classes to learn basic surveying and measurement techniques that were useful in the mine. In Edinburgh, later, he went to technical school in the evening, caught up on high school, and after many years and much difficulty, qualified as a civil engineer. He was determined that I would have the advantages that he had been denied. My mother was the daughter of William Wood, who owned a small woodworking business in the town of Galashiels in the Scottish Borders. Although not well-educated, and less of an advocate for education than my father, she was a great story-teller (though it was sometimes hard to tell the stories from gossip), and a prodigious letter- writer. She was proud of being Scottish (I could make her angry by saying that I was British, and apoplectic by saying that I was English), and she loved the Borders, where her family had been builders and carpenters for many generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report Grant ID INO1100038
    Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Global Working Group Progress Report Grant ID INO1100038 July 6, 2012 PROGRESS REPORT 2 HUMCAP OVERVIEW 6 Human Capital and Economic Opportunity MEMBERS 17 Global Working Group WORKING GROUPS 28 WORKING PAPERS 37 Table of Contents EVENTS 57 CONFERENCE SUMMARIES 109 WEBCONFERENCES 149 DISSEMINATION 164 CONTACT INFORMATION 182 www.hceconomics.org Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Global Working Group Progress Report Interim Progress Report of the Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Global Working Group July 2012 (1) Is the Project on track to be completed within the time frame of the Grant? Yes; we have made much progress over the last 6-months. This report outlines our recent and upcoming activities. (2) If not, what are obstacles or challenges impacting the time line? While we have made much progress, our primary obstacle is scheduling events given the busy schedules of working group leaders and members. However, conference call and webinar technology has helped resolve this challenge. As previously noted, due to cost-sharing with the Becker Friedman Institute for Research in Economics, as well as co-sponsorship of events, our spending has been slower than anticipated. For this reason, we expect to request a no-cost extension closer to the end of the award (12/2013). (3) Is the work developing as anticipated? Yes; the work is developing better than expected given our ambitious, long-term goals. Our accomplishments include 18 conferences, workshops, and webinars that have brought together disparate thinkers to address fundamental inequality issues. (Further detail on these activities can be found in the report.) Further, we have 54 working papers that have been viewed 1,724 times, and downloaded 1,127 times.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Jean-Marc ROBIN
    Curriculum Vitae Jean-Marc ROBIN June 2008 1. Education/Qualifications Dates Detail of degree; diploma; other Institution qualification 1984 Master Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l’Administration Economique (ENSAE), Paris, France 1985 MPhil Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne 1988 PhD Paris 1 1994 Habilitation Paris 1 2. Professional History (in chronological order) Dates Detail of position held Institution 1988-1997 Research fellow (Chargé de National Institute of recherches) Agricultural Research (INRA), France 1997-2002 Research director (Directeur de INRA recherches) 2002 - Professor of economics Université Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne, Paris 2004 - Professor of economics UCL (part time appointment 40%) 3. Other Appointments and Affiliations Dates Detail of position held Institution 1993-2002 Research fellow CREST-INSEE 2000-2004 Associate editor Economic Journal 2001- Associate editor Journal of Applied Economics 2001- Associate editor Econometrica 8/2004 Chair of the econometrics program Econometric Society committee European Meeting, Madrid 2005- Chair European Winter Meeting of the Econometrics Society 2007- Co-editor Econometrics Journal 12/2008 Chair of the program committee Conference EC², “Structural Microeconometrics”, Roma 4. Prizes, Awards and other Honours Dates Detail of prize, award or honour Awarding/electing body 1996 Prix Philip Morris pour la Science 2006 Frisch Medal award1 Econometric Society 2007 Fellow of the Econometric Econometric Society 2 Society 5. Grants 1986 -1988 : Magnac, T. et J.-M. Robin, « Analyse des transitions entre emploi salarié et non salarié », rapport au Plan n°34/1988. 1993 - 1995 : Lechène, V., T. Magnac, J.-M. Robin et M. Visser, « Insertion des jeunes sur le marché du travail : outils d'analyse et analyses empiriques'', rapport à la Délégation Interministérielle à l'Insertion des Jeunes, Avril 1995.
    [Show full text]
  • Essays in the Economics of Education
    Essays in the Economics of Education by Brian Christopher Clark Department of Economics Duke University Date: Approved: Peter Arcidiacono, Supervisor Arnaud Maurel V. Joseph Hotz Seth Sanders Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Economics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2016 Abstract Essays in the Economics of Education by Brian Christopher Clark Department of Economics Duke University Date: Approved: Peter Arcidiacono, Supervisor Arnaud Maurel V. Joseph Hotz Seth Sanders An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Economics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2016 Copyright c 2016 by Brian Christopher Clark All rights reserved except the rights granted by the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial Licence Abstract This dissertation is comprised of three essays in the economics of education. In the first essay, I examine how college students' major choice and major switching behavior responds to major-specific labor market shocks. The second essay explores the incidence and persistence of overeducation for workers in the United States. The final essay examines the role that students' cognitive and non-cognitive skills play in their transition from secondary to postsecondary education, and how the effect of these skills are moderated by race, gender, and socioeconomic status. iv To my loved ones: for always supporting me v Contents Abstract iv List of Tables ix List of Figures xi Acknowledgements xii 1 Introduction1 2 Shocked out of Your Major: Do Labor Market Shocks Prompt Ma- jor Switching?4 2.1 Labor market shocks..........................
    [Show full text]
  • School of Economics
    School of Economics School of Economics Celebrating research and teaching excellence A new School of Economics pp. 3-7 Research highlights pp. 8-13 Education spotlight pp. 14-19 Celebrating our alumni pp. 20-27 1 ‘I am absolutely delighted to hear about the birth of the Bristol School of Economics, giving a formal title to a long distinguished line of economists in Bristol.’ A new School Professor Sir Angus Deaton Former Professor of Econometrics at the University of Bristol and winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2015 of Economics We are home to more than 1,400 students from 60+ countries around the world, and have 65 permanent academic faculty members. Professor Sarah Smith, Head of Economics We are among the top economics departments in the UK. In the THE analysis of the Research Excellence Framework 2014, we ranked sixth overall for economics and first for research impact. We also It is hugely exciting to announce the birth, or rather re-birth, of the rank in the top 100 in the 2020 QS and Shanghai Rankings. School of Economics at Bristol. Economics has a strong tradition here dating back to Alfred Marshall, and we look forward to building on our excellent academic reputation and creating a School of Economics that delivers real-world relevant research and education In 2019 we secured ESRC Legacy Centre Status for the Centre with a firm commitment to outreach and engagement. for Evidence-based Public Services. This new centre reflects the research and impact agenda of our current staff covering health, education, welfare reform and the environment, with an emphasis on data-intensive research and prioritising policy impact.
    [Show full text]
  • DECEMBER 2015 8 Lars Peter Hansen in March 1979, Lars Peter Hansen, a Young Ph.D
    DECEMBER 2015 8 Lars Peter Hansen In March 1979, Lars Peter Hansen, a young Ph.D. fresh out of the University of Minnesota, submitted a paper to the prestigious Economet- rica. It described a statistical methodology that, in its final form, would allow economists to draw strong conclusions from models that weren’t completely specified (that is, not all variables, relationships or assump- tions were included or precisely defined). This “generalized method of moments” would give econometricians the ability to appraise alternative theories and investigate important economic phenomena without fully developing each of their elements. Researchers could rely on the most powerful explanatory variables and dispense with unnecessary assumptions. “GMM allows you to ‘do some- thing without having to do everything simultaneously,’” Hansen explains. But the GMM—abstract and mathematically challenging—was not immediately embraced by the field. (Indeed, Hansen’s initial draft was rejected by Econometrica, spurring him to refine and generalize his argument.) Hansen and his colleagues persevered, demonstrating the methodology’s power and range by applying it to exchange rates, as- set pricing models and rational expectations theory. These and other examples gradually convinced economists of its utility and, with time, GMM became the gold standard. In 2013, Hansen received the Nobel Prize in economic sciences for his methodology, specifically in reference to its ability to evaluate asset pricing models. Hansen continues to study asset prices, focusing on linkages be- tween financial markets and the broader macroeconomy. Recent work looks at uncertainty and risk tolerance in asset pricing behavior; he’s also developed methods to analyze and account for the uncertainty of the households and businesses that populate economic models, and also for the uncertainty that econometricians have about the adequacy of their models.
    [Show full text]
  • Stochastic Revealed Preferences with Measurement Error∗
    Stochastic Revealed Preferences with Measurement Error∗ Victor H. Aguiar† Nail Kashaev† [email protected] [email protected] First version received April 2018; Final version accepted June 2020. Abstract A long-standing question about consumer behavior is whether individu- als’ observed purchase decisions satisfy the revealed preference (RP) axioms of the utility maximization theory (UMT). Researchers using survey or experimental panel data sets on prices and consumption to answer this question face the well-known problem of measurement error. We show that ignoring measurement error in the RP approach may lead to overrejection of the UMT. To solve this problem, we pro- pose a new statistical RP framework for consumption panel data sets that allows for testing the UMT in the presence of measurement error. Our test is applicable to all consumer models that can be characterized by their first-order conditions. Our approach is nonparametric, allows for unrestricted heterogeneity in preferences, and requires only a centering condition on measurement error. We develop two applica- tions that provide new evidence about the UMT. First, we find support in a survey data set for the dynamic and time-consistent UMT in single-individual households, in the presence of nonclassical measurement error in consumption. In the second ap- plication, we cannot reject the static UMT in a widely used experimental data set in which measurement error in prices is assumed to be the result of price misperception due to the experimental design. The first finding stands in contrast to the conclu- sions drawn from the deterministic RP test of Browning (1989). The second finding reverses the conclusions drawn from the deterministic RP test of Afriat (1967) and Varian (1982).
    [Show full text]
  • John Philip Rust Vita Date
    Curriculum Vita: John Philip Rust Vita Date: March, 2010 Address: Department of Economics University of Maryland 3105 Tydings Hall College Park, MD 20742 Phone/Email: (301)405-3489 (phone) (301)405-3542 (fax) [email protected] (Internet) http://gemini.econ.umd.edu (WWW page) Education: Waukesha (Wisconsin) High School, Diploma, 1973 University of Pennsylvania, B.A. Mathematics, 1977 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Ph.D. Economics, 1983 Dissertation Title: “Stationary Equilibrium in a Market for Durable Assets” Yale University, Honorary Masters, 1996 Affiliations: 1977–1979 Research Analyst, Morgan Stanley & Co., New York 1983–1987 Assistant Professor, University of Wisconsin 1985–1986 Visiting Scholar, University of Minnesota 1987–1989 Associate Professor, University of Wisconsin 1988–1988 Visiting Scholar, Institute for Empirical Macroeconomics, Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank 1988–2005 Member, National Bureau of Economic Research 1988–1989 Visiting Scholar, Santa Fe Institute 1989–1991 Director, Social Systems Research Institute 1989–1991 Director, UW–Madison Data and Computation Center 1990–1997 Professor of Economics, University of Wisconsin 1990–2000 Research Council, Tasman Institute, Australia 1990–1991 Consultant to Steering Committee of Health and Retirement Survey, Institute for Social Research. 1991–1991 Visiting Professor, University of Oslo 1991–1992 Hoover Fellow, Stanford University 1992–1994 Graduate Admissions Chairman, University of Wisconsin 1993–1993 Visiting Lecturer, Tinbergen Institute, Rotterdam 1995–1995 Visiting Lecturer, University of Western Ontario 1995–1995 Research Consultant, Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System 1996–2001 Professor of Economics, Yale University. 1998–1999 Member, Panel of Expert Reviewers of Social Security Administration’s MINT Model 1998–1999 Member, Technical Panel of Social Security Advisory Board 2000–2002 Member, Steering Committee of the Health and Retirement Study, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan 2001–2004 Member, Long Term Modeling Advisory Group U.S.
    [Show full text]