DOCSLIB.ORG

Investment Funds News MARKET and LEGAL UPDATE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Investment Funds News MARKET and LEGAL UPDATE PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP Investment Funds News MARKET AND LEGAL UPDATE pmofkd==OMNM The Challenges for Banks and Their Investment Funds Under the “Volcker Rule” ROBERT M. HIRSH, ROBERT D. GOLDBAUM AND MICHAEL S. HONG INSIDE: Introduction On January 21, 2010, President Barack Obama - along with former Federal Reserve chairman, Paul Volcker - called for new restrictions on the size and scope of banks and other financial institutions to rein in excessive risk taking and to protect taxpayers. Often referred to as the “Volcker Rule,” the proposed qÜÉ=`Ü~ääÉåÖÉë=Ñçê=_~åâë=~åÇ restrictions mandate that “no bank or financial institution that contains a bank own, invest in or sponsor qÜÉáê=fåîÉëíãÉåí=cìåÇë=råÇÉê= a hedge fund or private equity fund.” íÜÉ="sçäÅâÉê= oìäÉ" On March 3, 2010, the White House released its draft of the proposed legislative amendments to the ^êÉ=vçìê=fåëáÇÉê=qê~ÇáåÖ=mçäáÅáÉë Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 that would put the Volcker Rule into effect. Among other provi- ^ÇÉèì~íÉ\ sions, the amendments define a “hedge fund” and a “private equity fund” as a company or other entity exempt from registration as an investment company under Sections 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of the U.S. réÇ~íÉW=m~óJíçJmä~ó=oÉÖìä~íáçåë Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Investment Company Act”) - the most common regulatory exemptions utilized by sponsors in the private investment fund industry. Further, the amendments define oÉÅÉåí=iáíáÖ~íáçå=^ÑÑÉÅíáåÖ=mêáî~íÉ “sponsoring” any such fund as: (i) serving as a general partner, managing member, or trustee of a fund; cìåÇë (ii) in any manner selecting or controlling (or having employees, officers or directors, or agents who con- stitute) a majority of the directors, trustees or management of a fund; or (iii) sharing with a fund, for cor- kÉïäó=bå~ÅíÉÇ=i~ïë=^ÑÑÉÅíáåÖ porate, marketing, promotional or other purposes, the same name or a variation of the same name. mêáî~íÉ=cìåÇë Related Volcker Rule-style proposals have taken the rule one step further, by barring the retention of any 1 equity, partnership or other ownership interest, or investment, in a hedge fund or private equity fund. mêçéçëÉÇ=iÉÖáëä~íáçå=^ÑÑÉÅíáåÖ mêáî~íÉ=cìåÇë Critics have attacked the Volcker Rule and these proposed legislative amendments for focusing unnecessarily on a business arena that had little to do with the current financial crisis, the genesis of which, they argue, was excessive exposure to real estate credit risk. According to the private equity research firm Investment Management Group Preqin, U.S. bank-sponsored funds raised a total of $80 billion in private equity capital commitments since qÜÉ= m~ìäI= tÉáëë= fåîÉëíãÉåí= j~å~ÖÉãÉåí= dêçìé 2006 - representing only 1% of the aggregate assets sitting on the balance sheets of Goldman Sachs, ÑçÅìëÉë= çå= íÜÉ= çêÖ~åáò~íáçåI= ÑìåÇ= ê~áëáåÖ= ~åÇ JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley and Bank of America. Some commentators have also ã~áåíÉå~åÅÉ=çÑ=éêáî~íÉ=áåîÉëíãÉåí=ÑìåÇë=çÑ=ÉîÉêó attacked the Volcker Rule for its intrusiveness, assuming that its adoption would require banks to divest íóéÉI=áåÅäìÇáåÖ=Äìóçìí=ÑìåÇëI=ÜÉÇÖÉ=ÑìåÇëI=îÉåíìêÉ themselves of hedge fund and private equity fund businesses in fire sales resulting in losses of value as Å~éáí~ä=ÑìåÇëI=ÜóÄêáÇ=ÑìåÇëI=ÇáëíêÉëëÉÇ=ÑìåÇëI=ãÉòJ banks are forced to sell divisions to buyers armed with significant tactical leverage. The prospect of such ò~åáåÉ= ÑìåÇëI= ëéçåëçêëÜáé= ÑìåÇëI= áåÑê~ëíêìÅíìêÉ forced divestitures is all the more unappealing in an economic climate that is unlikely to support favorable ÑìåÇëI= ÅçJáåîÉëíãÉåí= ÑìåÇë= = ~åÇ= ÑìåÇë= çÑ= ÑìåÇëK valuations, and in light of the “fire sale” experience of many major financial institutions in 2008 after the qÜÉ= Öêçìé= áë= ~äëç= áåîçäîÉÇ= áå= ~ÅèìáêáåÖI= ãÉêÖáåÖ implementation of FAS 157. (continued on page 2) ~åÇ=~ÇîáëáåÖ=áåîÉëíãÉåí=ã~å~ÖÉãÉåí=ÄìëáåÉëëÉëK få=~ÇÇáíáçåI=íÜÉ=Öêçìé=êÉéêÉëÉåíë=~=ÇáîÉêëÉ=Öêçìé=çÑ 1 ÇçãÉëíáÅ=~åÇ=ÑçêÉáÖå=áåîÉëíçêë=áå=ÅçååÉÅíáçå=ïáíÜ For summaries of other legislative efforts that mirror the tenets of the Volcker Rule, see herein “Proposed Legislation íÜÉáê=áåîÉëíãÉåíë=áå=éêáî~íÉ=áåîÉëíãÉåí=ÑìåÇëK= Affecting Private Funds.” © 2010 Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP. In some jurisdictions, this brochure may be considered attorney advertising. Past represenations are no guarantee of future outcomes. NEW YORK BEIJING HONG KONG LONDON TOKYO WASHINGTON DC WILMINGTON fksbpqjbkq=crkap=kbtp pmofkd==OMNM The Challenges for Banks and Their Investment Funds Under the “Volcker Rule” (continued from page 1) In his written testimony before the Senate Blackstone Group’s sale of a 10% stake to the going to be sold, to whom and how? The second Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban China Investment Company in May of 2007 (one challenge is determining how to address the needs Affairs on February 2, 2010, Mr. Volcker argued month before listing its partnership units on the and concerns of the existing third-party investor that “hedge funds, private equity funds . unrelat- NYSE), Apollo Global Management’s sale of a base - what concerns will they have, and, ultimate- ed to customer needs and continuing banking rela- 20% stake to the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority ly, what obstacles will they, or could they, pose? tionships should stand on their own.” Based on and CalPERS in July of 2007 (one month before The third challenge is determining the needs and such statements and the overarching requirement listing its units on the Goldman Sachs Rule 144A concerns of the investment professionals that rep- set forth in the proposed amendments that “GSTrUE” platform) and Och-Ziff ’s sale of a resent the core asset housed within the alternative “appropriate Federal banking agencies shall jointly 10% stake to Dubai International in October of asset manager - how does one retain them, or what prohibit sponsoring or investment in hedge funds 2007 (one month before listing its shares on the role are they, or can they be, expected to play? We and private equity funds” by insured depository NYSE). These examples and the others that examine each of these challenges below. institutions, entities that control them or bank accompanied them over the last decade marked a holding companies, the practical implications of significant shift in the development of the once Structural Challenges the Volcker Rule, if enacted as law in its current secretive private investment fund industry. To the extent that the proposed legislative form, are that banks that sponsor hedge fund or amendments that attempt to codify the Volcker private equity fund businesses may need to sell Prior to the financial crisis, seller motivations Rule seek to prohibit banks or their affiliates from them. included personal diversification of founder “sponsoring” hedge funds or private equity funds wealth, employee incentivization, access to greater - that is, from assuming a position of control over New Motivations for Old distribution and other strategic resources, and any such funds - then the path to an exit from Transactions establishing a stronger acquisition currency. these activities is likely to take one of the follow- Although acquisitions and divestitures of Buyers were often motivated by the search for ing three forms. The first form is a relatively investment managers have become standard fare diversification of their revenue base and access to straightforward sale of 100% of the bank’s inter- in the world of traditional money management, additional asset management products. With the est in the fund and its related alternative asset man- until recently, they were less common in the onset of the financial crisis, however, the sell-side ager to an unaffiliated third party. Under this human-capital intensive and highly profitable, but motivations shifted dramatically. The motivations form, the buyer ends up owning 100% or a major- volatile, world of alternative asset managers. From included changes, sometimes fundamental, in fund ity of the interests of the manager, and the invest- 2000 to early 2008, a number of high-profile sales strategy, the need to dispose balance sheets of ment professionals behind the fund’s performance of significant stakes in both hedge fund and pri- non-core or even “toxic” assets and, of course, the end up with employment contracts and/or eco- vate equity fund firms were completed, through financial distress or bankruptcy of the fund spon- nomic incentives in the form of minority equity private sales, quasi-public and public offerings, and sor itself. Unlike their predecessors, these transac- stakes in the manager, the buyer or one of their combinations thereof. Prime examples of private tions were less about liquidity or expansion than affiliates. 3 sales of minority stakes include Morgan Stanley’s they were about exits. acquisition of a minority stake in Avenue Capital The second form of exit is the “sponsored” Group in October of 2006, Lehman Brother’s Banks or similar financial institutions that spin-off or spin-out - a transaction that results in acquisition of a minority stake in the D.E. Shaw actively own, operate or sponsor hedge fund or the buyer acquiring a minority interest in the Group in March of 2007, Affiliated Managers private equity fund businesses, then, have a wide divested manager, with the investment profession- Group’s acquisition of minority stakes in Blue array of precedent transactions to turn to when als taking the majority. In this scenario, the buyer Mountain Capital Management and ValueAct trying to anticipate what strategic, commercial and provides the necessary cash and liquidity to facili- Capital in the fourth quarter of 2007, and The legal issues a sale or other divestiture of those tate the transaction, but otherwise “invests” in the Carlyle Group’s sale of a 7.5% stake to the businesses might involve. The principal question management team and plays a supporting role, Mubadala Development Company, an affiliate of that looms, however, is what challenges are likely perhaps in the capacity of a key investor, a service the Government of Abu Dhabi, in December of to be most prevalent when those sales or other provider or some other source of strategic 2 2007.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Will the Sec Survive Financial Regulatory Reform?
    WILL THE SEC SURVIVE FINANCIAL REGULATORY REFORM? Renee M. Jones* A BSTRACT The Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) conspicuous failures during the financial crisis of 2008 have led many to question the agency’s relevance in the modern financial era. Some commentators have called for the creation of new super-agencies to assume a substantial portion of the SEC’s duties. Others highlight enforcement failures and question the agency’s commitment to its investor protection mission. Despite its recent missteps and persistent calls for regulatory overhaul, the SEC’s future seems secure for now as President Obama’s reform proposals (the “Obama Plan”) as currently conceived preserve the agency’s independence. Although thus far the Obama Plan protects the SEC’s status as an independent agency, several aspects of the plan threaten the agency’s long- term prospects. The proposal to expand the executive branch’s role in oversight over financial institutions may represent the beginning of an incremental encroachment on SEC authority. Similarly, the proposed Consumer Financial Protection Agency could absorb a portion of the SEC’s traditional investor protection role. In the end, the SEC’s survival depends on whether its leadership takes effective action to restore its credibility and regain the public trust in the years to come. I. INTRODUCTION The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) is currently under siege. Its once stellar reputation has been tarnished by a series of inauspicious events that unfolded during the financial meltdown of 2008. The agency’s passivity during the collapse of Bear Stearns, its failure to detect Bernard Madoff’s massive fraud, and the failure of the Consolidated Supervised Entity program for financial conglomerates have led many to question the agency’s competence and relevance in the era of modern globalized financial markets.1 * Associate Professor, Boston College Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Investigation
    REPORT OF INVESTIGATION UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Investigation into Allegations of Improper Preferential Treatment and Special Access in Connection with the Division of Enforcement's Investigation of Citigroup, Inc. Case No. OIG-559 September 27,2011 This document is subjed to the provisions of th e Privacy Act of 1974, and may require redadion before disdosure to third parties. No redaction has betn performed by the Office of Inspedor Gmeral. Recipients of this report should not disseminate or copy it without the Inspector General's approval. " Report of Investigation Cas. No. OIG-559 Investigation into Allegations of Improper Preferential Treatment and Speeial Access in Connection with the Division of Enforcement's Investigation ofCitigroup, Inc. Table of Contents Introduction and Summary of Results ofthe Investigation ......................................... ..... .. I Scope of the Investigation................................................................................................... 2 Relevant Statutes, Regulations and Pol icies ....................................................................... 4 Results of the Investigation................................................. .. .............................................. 5 I. The Enforcement Staff Investigated Citigroup and Considered Various Charges and Settlement Options ........................................................................................... 5 A. The Enforcement Staff Opened an Investigation
    [Show full text]
  • The SEC's Troubling New Policy Requiring Admissions
    Securities Regulation & Law Report™ Reproduced with permission from Securities Regulation & Law Report, 45 SRLR 1172, 06/24/2013. Copyright ஽ 2013 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com SEC ENFORCEMENT The SEC’s Troubling New Policy Requiring Admissions mission of misconduct may be appropriate, even if it does not allow us to achieve a prompt resolution.’’2 While the exact parameters of when admissions will be required were not laid out, Enforcement Division Co- Directors Andrew Ceresney and George Canellos said admissions might be required in cases of ‘‘egregious in- tentional misconduct,’’ where the defendant had ob- structed the investigation, or where the conduct ‘‘harmed large numbers of investors.’’3 Although Chair White may have seen a need to re- spond to critics of the SEC’s settlement approach, this policy change could have serious consequences for the agency, and ultimately for the very investors whose in- BY MARC FAGEL terests the SEC is supposed to protect. Faced with the n June 18, recently-appointed Securities and Ex- prospect of admissions that can be used against them in change Commission Chair Mary Jo White re- other proceedings and expose them to massive collat- O leased something of a bombshell, announcing that eral damages, companies and their officers will be in- the agency would break from its long-standing practice centivized to take more cases to trial. And the SEC, of allowing defendants to settle cases without admitting which will see its already limited enforcement re- liability and, in certain cases, require admissions as a sources further diminished by protracted litigation, will 1 condition of settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • JP Morgan Chase Sofya Frantslikh Pace University
    Pace University DigitalCommons@Pace Honors College Theses Pforzheimer Honors College 3-14-2005 Mergers and Acquisitions, Featured Case Study: JP Morgan Chase Sofya Frantslikh Pace University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/honorscollege_theses Part of the Corporate Finance Commons Recommended Citation Frantslikh, Sofya, "Mergers and Acquisitions, Featured Case Study: JP Morgan Chase" (2005). Honors College Theses. Paper 7. http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/honorscollege_theses/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Pforzheimer Honors College at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College Theses by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thesis Mergers and Acquisitions Featured Case Study: JP Morgan Chase By: Sofya Frantslikh 1 Dedicated to: My grandmother, who made it her life time calling to educate people and in this way, make their world better, and especially mine. 2 Table of Contents 1) Abstract . .p.4 2) Introduction . .p.5 3) Mergers and Acquisitions Overview . p.6 4) Case In Point: JP Morgan Chase . .p.24 5) Conclusion . .p.40 6) Appendix (graphs, stats, etc.) . .p.43 7) References . .p.71 8) Annual Reports for 2002, 2003 of JP Morgan Chase* *The annual reports can be found at http://www.shareholder.com/jpmorganchase/annual.cfm) 3 Abstract Mergers and acquisitions have become the most frequently used methods of growth for companies in the twenty first century. They present a company with a potentially larger market share and open it u p to a more diversified market. A merger is considered to be successful, if it increases the acquiring firm’s value; m ost mergers have actually been known to benefit both competition and consumers by allowing firms to operate more efficiently.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Investigation
    This document is subject to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, and may require redaction before disclosure to third parties. No redaction has been performed by the Office of Inspector General. Recipients of this report should not disseminate or copy it without the Inspector General's approval. REPORT OF INVESTIGATION UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Case No. OIG-567 Destruction of Records Related to Matters Under Inquiry and Incomplete Statements to the National Archives and Records Administration Regarding that Destruction by the Division of Enforcement October 5, 2011 OIG-567 Redaction Key All redactions have been made pursuant to FOIA Exemptions (b)(6) & (b)(7)(C). This document is subject to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, and may require redaction before disclosure to third parties. No redaction has been performed by the Office of Inspector General. Recipients ofthis report should not disseminate or copy it without the Inspector General's approval. REPORT OF INVESTIGATION Case No. OIG-567 Destruction of Records Related to Matters Under Inquiry and Incomplete Statements to tbe National Archives and Records Administration Regarding tbat Destruction by tbe Division of Enforcement Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF RESULTS ...................................................... 1 SCOPE OF THE OIG INVESTIGATION ......................................................................... 4 I. Review ofE-mails ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PEI June2020 PEI300.Pdf
    Cover story 20 Private Equity International • June 2020 Cover story Better capitalised than ever Page 22 The Top 10 over the decade Page 24 A decade that changed PE Page 27 LPs share dealmaking burden Page 28 Testing the value creation story Page 30 Investing responsibly Page 32 The state of private credit Page 34 Industry sweet spots Page 36 A liquid asset class Page 38 The PEI 300 by the numbers Page 40 June 2020 • Private Equity International 21 Cover story An industry better capitalised than ever With almost $2trn raised between them in the last five years, this year’s PEI 300 are armed and ready for the post-coronavirus rebuild, writes Isobel Markham nnual fundraising mega-funds ahead of the competition. crisis it’s better to be backed by a pri- figures go some way And Blackstone isn’t the only firm to vate equity firm, particularly and to towards painting a up the ante. The top 10 is around $30 the extent that it is able and prepared picture of just how billion larger than last year’s, the top to support these companies, which of much capital is in the 50 has broken the $1 trillion mark for course we are,” he says. hands of private equi- the first time, and the entire PEI 300 “The businesses that we own at Aty managers, but the ebbs and flows of has amassed $1.988 trillion. That’s the Blackstone that are directly affected the fundraising cycle often leave that same as Italy’s GDP. Firms now need by the pandemic, [such as] Merlin, picture incomplete.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening the Sec's Vital Enforcement
    S. HRG. 111–175 STRENGTHENING THE SEC’S VITAL ENFORCEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON SECURITIES, INSURANCE, AND INVESTMENT OF THE COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON EXAMINING THE IMPORTANT ROLE OF THE SECURITIES AND EX- CHANGE COMMISSION IN PROTECTING INVESTORS BY AGGRESSIVELY ENFORCING FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS MAY 7, 2009 Printed for the use of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs ( Available at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate/senate05sh.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 53–779 PDF WASHINGTON : 2009 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut, Chairman TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama JACK REED, Rhode Island ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York JIM BUNNING, Kentucky EVAN BAYH, Indiana MIKE CRAPO, Idaho ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey MEL MARTINEZ, Florida DANIEL K. AKAKA, Hawaii BOB CORKER, Tennessee SHERROD BROWN, Ohio JIM DEMINT, South Carolina JON TESTER, Montana DAVID VITTER, Louisiana HERB KOHL, Wisconsin MIKE JOHANNS, Nebraska MARK R. WARNER, Virginia KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon MICHAEL F. BENNET, Colorado EDWARD SILVERMAN, Staff Director WILLIAM D. DUHNKE, Republican Staff Director DAWN RATLIFF, Chief Clerk DEVIN HARTLEY, Hearing Clerk SHELVIN SIMMONS, IT Director JIM CROWELL, Editor SUBCOMMITTEE ON SECURITIES, INSURANCE, AND INVESTMENT JACK REED, Rhode Island, Chairman JIM BUNNING, Kentucky, Ranking Republican Member TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota MEL MARTINEZ, Florida CHARLES E.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Fed Letter: Understanding the New World Order of Private
    ESSAYS ON ISSUES THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OCTOBER 2010 OF CHICAGO NUMBER 279a Chicag­o­Fed­Letter Understanding the new world order of private equity by William Mark, lead examiner, Supervision and Regulation, and head, Private Equity Merchant Banking Knowledge Center, and Steven VanBever, lead supervision analyst, Supervision and Regulation The Federal Reserve System’s Private Equity Merchant Banking Knowledge Center, formed at the Chicago Fed in 2000 after the passage of the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act, sponsors an annual conference on new industry developments. This article summarizes the tenth annual conference, The New World Order of Private Equity, held on July 21–22, 2010. To­kick­off­the­conference,1­Carl­ loss­of­competitiveness­over­the­long­ Tannenbaum,­Federal­Reserve­Bank­­ term­for­the­U.S.­and­other­developed­ of­Chicago,­reflected­briefly­on­the­­ economies­relative­to­China­and­other­ decade­since­the­passage­of­the­Gramm– emerging­countries.­Hutchins­cited­a­ Leach–Bliley­Act.­These­years­saw­exten- number­of­negative­indicators­in­the­U.S.,­ sive­financial­innovation,­along­with­the­ such­as­rising­health­care­and­energy­ removal­of­regulatory­barriers­that­­ costs,­the­trade­deficit,­governmental­ traditionally­separated­the­activities­­ budget­deficits,­loss­of­leadership­in­tech- of­commercial­and­investment­banks.­ nological­innovation,­lagging­educational­ The­financial­crisis­prompted­a­reeval- systems,­and­political­polarization.­ By a number of measures, uation­of­many­views­that­had­been­ the state of private equity widely­held,­culminating­in­President­ State of the industry has improved since the worst Obama­signing­the­Dodd–Frank­Wall­ A­panel­led­by­Mark­O’Hare,­Preqin­ of the financial crisis, but Street­Reform­and­Consumer­Protection­ Ltd.,­explored­the­evolving­role­of­pri- Act­on­July­21,­2010­(by­coincidence,­ vate­equity­(PE)­in­the­economy­and­ many features of the asset the­first­day­of­the­conference).­ in­investor­portfolios.­It­featured­Paul­ class have been altered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Deferred Prosecution Agreements James R
    T R EPO R E C USTI J IVIL C THE SHADOW REGULATORY STATE No. 14 No. May 2012 14 The Rise of Deferred Prosecution Agreements James R. Copland Senior Fellow Manhattan Institute for Policy Research C L P CENTER FOR LEGAL POLICY AT THE MANHATTAN INSTITUTE Published by Manhattan Institute The Shadow Regulatory State EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Over the last decade, a novel form of federal government regulation has emerged, prompted not by new congressional legislation or administrative agency action but rather by aggressive assertion of prosecutorial authority over business. With- out any actual criminal trials and little to no judicial supervision, government attorneys in the U.S. Department of Justice have pressured corporations to pay significant fines, to modify business practices, and even to sack top management. The Justice Department and various U.S. Attorneys’ offices have entered into more than 200 “deferred prosecution” or “non-prosecution” agreements (DPAs and NPAs) in the last ten years. Seven of the 100 largest U.S. businesses, as ranked by Fortune magazine, are currently operating under the supervision of federal prosecutors. The widespread use of DPAs and NPAs followed shortly in the wake of the federal government’s May 6, 2002, indict- ment of the large accounting firm Arthur Andersen. The U.S. Supreme Court ultimately set aside Andersen’s conviction in 2005, but the firm had long since collapsed—throwing tens of thousands of Americans out of work. Many businesses can ill afford to fight a criminal investigation: criminal inquiries place significant pressure on stock prices and can impair companies’ ability to obtain credit, and businesses in some industries can be debarred from government contracting or denied government licenses upon an indictment or conviction.
    [Show full text]
  • Allegations of Improper Coordination Between the SEC and Other Governmental Entities Concerning the SEC's Enforcement Action Against Goldman Sachs & Co
    This document is subject to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, and may require redaction before disclosure to third parties. No redaction has been performed by the Office of Inspector General. Recipients of this report should not disseminate or copy it without the Inspector General's approval. REPORT OF INVESTIGATION UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Case No. OIG-534 Allegations of Improper Coordination Between the SEC and Other Governmental Entities Concerning the SEC's Enforcement Action Against Goldman Sachs & Co. September 30, 2010 REDACTION KEY LE = Law Enforcement PrivilegelPotentially Harmful to Ongoing Litigation PH = Personal Identifying Information This document is subject to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, and may require redaction before disclosure to third parties. No redaction has been performed by the Office ofInspector General. Recipients of this report should not disseminate or copy it without the Inspector General's approval. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ....................................................................... 1 SCOPE OF THE OIG INVESTIGATION ......................................................................... 1 I. E-MAIL SEARCHES AND REVIEW OF E-MAILS ............................................ 1 II. DOCUMENT REQUESTS AND REVIEW OF RECORDS ................................. 2 III. TESTIMONY AND INTERVIEWS ...................................................................... 2 RELEVANT STATUTES, RULES AND REGULATIONS ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nuance Communications, Inc
    The ongoing fallout from the 2008 financial crisis has The securities and financial services industry has been generated a host of unprecedented challenges for broker­ a key focus of government attention. As announced by dealer, investment banking, investment advisory, and other President Obama in his January 2012 State of the Union financial services firms. Last year alone, the industry was address, the U.S. Department of Justice has formed a hit with wave upon wave of criminal prosecutions, regula­ new unit within the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task tory enforcement proceedings, and parallel private civil Force-the Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities actions. In fiscal year 2011, U.S. Attorneys' offices nation­ Working Group. The group will consist of at least 55 DOJ wide collected $6.5 billion in criminal and civil actions, and lawyers, analysts, agents, and investigators from across the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission commenced the country and will be chaired by the heads of the DOJ's 735 enforcement actions and obtained over $2.8 billion in civil and criminal divisions, the U.S. Attorney from penalties and disgorgement. Many of the more high-profile Colorado, SEC enforcement head Robert Khuzami, and matters also triggered congressional hearings as well as New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman. It will massive adverse press attention and publicity. focus on investigating those responsible for misconduct contributing to the financial crisis through the pooling and sale of residential mortgage-backed securities. The unit has already sent subpoenas to 11 financial institutions.1 * This Director Notes is based on "Handling a Corporate Crisis: The Ten Commandments of Crisis Management," by John F.
    [Show full text]
  • Attendee Bios
    ATTENDEE BIOS Ejim Peter Achi, Shareholder, Greenberg Traurig Ejim Achi represents private equity sponsors in connection with buyouts, mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures, restructurings and other investments spanning a wide range of industries and sectors, with particular emphasis on technology, healthcare, industrials, consumer packaged goods, hospitality and infrastructure. Rukaiyah Adams, Chief Investment Officer, Meyer Memorial Trust Rukaiyah Adams is the chief investment officer at Meyer Memorial Trust, one of the largest charitable foundations in the Pacific Northwest. She is responsible for leading all investment activities to ensure the long-term financial strength of the organization. Throughout her tenure as chief investment officer, Adams has delivered top quartile performance; and beginning in 2017, her team hit its stride delivering an 18.6% annual return, which placed her in the top 5% of foundation and endowment CIOs. Under the leadership of Adams, Meyer increased assets managed by diverse managers by more than threefold, to 40% of all assets under management, and women managers by tenfold, to 25% of AUM, proving that hiring diverse managers is not a concessionary practice. Before joining Meyer, Adams ran the $6.5 billion capital markets fund at The Standard, a publicly traded company. At The Standard, she oversaw six trading desks that included several bond strategies, preferred equities, derivatives and other risk mitigation strategies. Adams is the chair of the prestigious Oregon Investment Council, the board that manages approximately $100 billion of public pension and other assets for the state of Oregon. During her tenure as chair, the Oregon state pension fund has been the top-performing public pension fund in the U.S.
    [Show full text]