DOCSLIB.ORG

(MSC) Announcement Comment Draft Report for Client Jeong Il

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(MSC) Announcement Comment Draft Report for Client Jeong Il Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) Announcement Comment Draft Report for Client Jeong Il Corporation Antarctic krill fishery On Behalf of Jeong Il Corporation, Seoul Prepared by Control Union UK Ltd. September 2020 Authors: Henry Ernst Julian Addison Gudrun Gaudian Sophie des Clers Jung-Hee Cho Control Union UK Ltd. 56 High Street, Lymington, Hampshire, SO41 9AH United Kingdom Tel: 01590 613007 Fax: 01590 671573 Email: [email protected] Website: http.uk.controlunion.com Contents CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................... 1 QA ............................................................................................................................................... 2 GLOSSARY ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 3 2 REPORT DETAILS ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Authorship and Peer Reviewers .............................................................................................. 6 2.2 Version details ......................................................................................................................... 8 3 UNIT(S) OF ASSESSMENT AND CERTIFICATION ................................................................................... 9 3.1 Unit(s) of Assessment (UoA) ................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Unit(s) of Certification (UoC) .................................................................................................. 9 4 ASSESSMENT RESULTS OVERVIEW ................................................................................................ 11 4.1 Determination, formal conclusion and agreement .............................................................. 11 4.2 Principle level scores ............................................................................................................. 11 4.3 Recommendations ................................................................................................................ 11 5 TRACEABILITY AND ELIGIBILITY .................................................................................................... 12 5.1 Eligibility date ........................................................................................................................ 12 5.2 Traceability within the fishery .............................................................................................. 12 5.3 Eligibility to enter further chains of custody ......................................................................... 14 5.4 Eligibility of Inseparable or Practicably Inseparable (IPI) stock(s) to enter further chains of custody 15 6 SCORING ............................................................................................................................... 19 6.1 Summary of PI Level Scores .................................................................................................. 19 6.2 Fishery overview ................................................................................................................... 21 6.2.1 History of fishery and its management ............................................................................................... 21 6.2.2 Gear and operation of the fishery ....................................................................................................... 22 6.2.3 Fishing areas and seasons ................................................................................................................... 23 6.2.4 Catch profiles and data availability ..................................................................................................... 24 6.3 Principle 1.............................................................................................................................. 25 6.3.1 Biology and ecology ............................................................................................................................ 25 6.3.2 Feeding, predators and the role of Euphausia superba in the ecosystem .......................................... 26 6.3.3 Harvest strategy and regulations ........................................................................................................ 27 6.3.4 Data/Monitoring/Enforcement ........................................................................................................... 29 6.3.5 Stock assessment of krill ..................................................................................................................... 30 6.3.6 Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and Catch Data ...................................................................................... 34 6.3.7 Principle 1 Performance Indicator scores and rationales ................................................................... 36 6.4 Principle 2.............................................................................................................................. 56 6.4.1 Designation of species under Principle 2 ............................................................................................ 56 CU UK Full Assessment Reporting Template v3.2 (26th June 2019) QA: 3398R01C 1 6.4.2 Primary and Secondary species ........................................................................................................... 56 6.4.3 ETP species .......................................................................................................................................... 63 6.4.4 Habitats ............................................................................................................................................... 70 6.4.5 Ecosystem ........................................................................................................................................... 78 6.4.6 Cumulative impacts ............................................................................................................................. 87 6.4.7 Scoring elements ................................................................................................................................. 88 6.4.8 Principle 2 Performance Indicator scores and rationales ................................................................... 90 6.5 Principle 3............................................................................................................................ 134 6.5.1 Legal and customary framework ....................................................................................................... 134 6.5.2 Port States ......................................................................................................................................... 138 6.5.3 Consultation, roles and responsibilities ............................................................................................ 139 6.5.4 Long-term objectives ........................................................................................................................ 141 6.5.5 Fishery specific objectives ................................................................................................................. 143 6.5.6 Decision-making processes ............................................................................................................... 143 6.5.7 Compliance and enforcement ........................................................................................................... 144 6.5.8 Monitoring and Management performance evaluation ................................................................... 150 6.5.9 Principle 3 Performance Indicator scores and rationales ................................................................. 153 7 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 178 8 APPENDICES ......................................................................................................................... 188 Appendix 1.1 Small-scale fisheries ................................................................................................ 188 APPENDIX 1 ASSESSMENT INFORMATION ..................................................................................... 188 APPENDIX 2 EVALUATION PROCESSES AND TECHNIQUES ................................................................... 189 Appendix 2.1 Site visits ................................................................................................................. 189 Appendix 2.2 Stakeholder participation ....................................................................................... 189 Appendix 2.3 Evaluation techniques ............................................................................................. 189 APPENDIX 3 PEER REVIEW REPORTS ............................................................................................ 190 APPENDIX 4 STAKEHOLDER INPUT ............................................................................................... 191 APPENDIX 5 CONDITIONS ......................................................................................................... 192 APPENDIX 6 CLIENT ACTION PLAN .............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Seas Bottom Trawl Fisheries and Their Impacts on the Biodiversity Of
    High Seas Bottom Trawl Fisheries and their Impacts on the Biodiversity of Vulnerable Deep-Sea Ecosystems: Options for International Action Matthew Gianni Cover Photography The author wishes to thank the following contributors for use of their photography. Clockwise from top right: A rare anglerfish or sea toad (Chaunacidae: Bathychaunax coloratus), measuring 20.5 cm in total length, on the Davidson Seamount (2461 meters). Small, globular, reddish, cirri or hairy protrusions cover the body. The lure on the forehead is used to attract prey. Credit: NOAA/MBARI 2002 Industrial fisheries of Orange roughy. Emptying a mesh full of Orange roughy into a trawler. © WWF / AFMA, Credit: Australian Fisheries Management Authority White mushroom sponge (Caulophecus sp). on the Davidson Seamount (1949 meters). Credit: NOAA/MBARI 2002 Bubblegum coral (Paragorgia sp.) and stylasterid coral (Stylaster sp.) at 150 meters depth off Adak Island, Alaska. Credit: Alberto Lindner/NOAA Cover design: James Oliver, IUCN Global Marine Programme Printing of this publication was made possible through the generous support of HIGH SEAS BOTTOM TRAWL FISHERIES AND THEIR IMPACTS ON THE BIODIVERSITY OF VULNERABLE DEEP-SEA ECOSYSTEMS: OPTIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL ACTION Matthew Gianni IUCN – The World Conservation Union 2004 Report prepared for IUCN - The World Conservation Union Natural Resources Defense Council WWF International Conservation International The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, WWF, Conservation International or Natural Resources Defense Council concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Reinitiated Biological Opinion on Groundfish Fisheries Affecting Humpback Whales
    Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7(a)(2) Biological and Conference Opinion Continuing Operation of the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery (Reinitiation of consultation #NWR-2012-876) – Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) NMFS Consultation Number: WCRO-2018-01378 ARN 151422WCR2018PR00213 Action Agency: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Affected Species and NMFS’ Determinations: ESA-Listed Species Status Is Action Is Action Is Action Is Action Likely Likely to Likely To Likely to To Destroy or Adversely Jeopardize Adversely Adversely Affect the Species? Affect Modify Critical Species? Critical Habitat? Habitat? Humpback whale Endangered Yes No No No (Megaptera novaeangliae) – Central America DPS Humpback whale – Threatened Yes No No No Mexico DPS Consultation Conducted By: National Marine Fisheries Service, West Coast Region Issued By: _______________________________ Barry A. Thom Regional Administrator Date: October 26, 2020 ESA Section 7 Consultation Number WCRO-2018-01378 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 7 1.1. Background ..................................................................................................................................................................7 1.2. Consultation History ................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.3. Proposed Federal Action .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 182/Wednesday, September 21
    55334 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 182 / Wednesday, September 21, 2005 / Notices 15 minutes for a request for a Dolphin DATES: Written comments must be IV. Request for Comments Mortality Limit; 10 minutes for submitted on or before November 21, Comments are invited on: (a) Whether notification of vessel arrival; 60 minutes 2005. the proposed collection of information for a tuna tracking form; 10 minutes for ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments is necessary for the proper performance a monthly tuna storage removal report; to Diana Hynek, Departmental of the functions of the agency, including 60 minutes for a monthly tuna receiving Paperwork Clearance Officer, whether the information shall have report; and 30 minutes for a special Department of Commerce, Room 6625, practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the report documenting the origin of tuna (if 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., agency’s estimate of the burden requested by the NOAA Administrator). (including hours and cost) of the Estimated Total Annual Burden Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at [email protected]). proposed collection of information; (c) Hours: 135. ways to enhance the quality, utility, and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Estimated Total Annual Cost to clarity of the information to be Requests for additional information or Public: $519. collected; and (d) ways to minimize the copies of the information collection burden of the collection of information IV. Request for Comments instrument and instructions should be on respondents, including through the Comments are invited on: (a) Whether directed to Amy S. Van Atten, (508) use of automated collection techniques the proposed collection of information 495–2266 or [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • A GUIDE to IDENTIFICATION of FISHES CAUGHT ALONG with the ANTARCTIC KRILL Author(S) 1) Iwami, T
    Document No. [ to be completed by the Secretariat ] WG-EMM-07/32 Date submitted [ to be completed by the Secretariat ] 1 July 2007 Language [ to be completed by the Secretariat ] Original: English Agenda Agenda Item No(s): 4.3 Title A GUIDE TO IDENTIFICATION OF FISHES CAUGHT ALONG WITH THE ANTARCTIC KRILL Author(s) 1) Iwami, T. and 2) M. Naganobu Affiliation(s) 1) Laboratory of Biology, Tokyo Kasei Gakuin University 2) National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries Published or accepted for publication elsewhere? Yes No x If published, give details ABSTRACT A field key to early life stages of Antarctic fish caught along with the Antarctic krill is produced. The key includes 8 families and 28 species mainly from the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean and uses distinguished characters which permit rapid field identification. In some cases, however, it is impossible to discriminate among species of the same family by remarkable characters. A species key is not shown for such resemble species and a brief summary of the main morphological features of species and genera is provided. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AS RELATED TO NOMINATED AGENDA ITEMS Agenda Item Finding 4.3 We are producing a practical field key to juvenile fish caught along with the Antarctic Scientific krill. To our knowledge more than 40 species of fish have been found as by-catch. Observation However, the number of dominant fish species found in the krill catch never exceeds 20 species. An useful and practical identification key to these dominant species maybe facilitate the quantitative assessment of fish in the krill catch.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Common Dolphin Bycatch in the Pole-And-Line Tuna Fishery In
    Estimating common dolphin bycatch in the pole-and-line tuna fishery in the Azores Maria Joa˜o Cruz1,2, Miguel Machete2, Gui Menezes1,2, Emer Rogan3 and Mo´nica A. Silva2,4 1 Departamento de Oceanografia e Pescas, Universidade dos Ac¸ores, Horta, Ac¸ores, Portugal 2 MARE—Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre and IMAR—Instituto do Mar, Universidade dos Ac¸ores, Horta, Ac¸ores, Portugal 3 School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Enterprise Centre, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland 4 Department of Biology, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA ABSTRACT Small-scale artisanal fisheries can have a significant negative impact in cetacean populations. Cetacean bycatch has been documented in the pole-and-line tuna fishery in the Azores with common dolphins being the species more frequently taken. Based on data collected by observers on ∼50% of vessels operating from 1998 to 2012, we investigate the influence of various environmental and fisheries-related factors in common dolphin bycatch and calculate fleet-wide estimates of total bycatch using design-based and model-based methods. Over the 15-year study dolphin bycatch occurred in less than 0.4% of the observed fishing events. Generalized additive modelling results suggest a significant relationship between common dolphin bycatch and duration of fishing events, sea surface temperature and location. Total bycatch calculated from the traditional stratified ratio estimation approach was 196 (95% CI: 186–205), while the negative binomial GAM estimated 262 (95% CI: 249–274) dolphins. Bycatch estimates of common dolphin were similar using statistical approaches suggesting that either of these methods may be Submitted 21 August 2017 used in future bycatch assessments for this fishery.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the Eastern Ross Sea, Antarctica
    Polar Biol (2004) 27: 637–650 DOI 10.1007/s00300-004-0632-2 REVIEW Joseph Donnelly Æ Joseph J. Torres Tracey T. Sutton Æ Christina Simoniello Fishes of the eastern Ross Sea, Antarctica Received: 26 November 2003 / Revised: 16 April 2004 / Accepted: 20 April 2004 / Published online: 16 June 2004 Ó Springer-Verlag 2004 Abstract Antarctic fishes were sampled with 41 midwater in Antarctica is dominated by a few fish families and 6 benthic trawls during the 1999–2000 austral (Bathylagidae, Gonostomatidae, Myctophidae and summer in the eastern Ross Sea. The oceanic pelagic Paralepididae) with faunal diversity decreasing south assemblage (0–1,000 m) contained Electrona antarctica, from the Antarctic Polar Front to the continent (Ever- Gymnoscopelus opisthopterus, Bathylagus antarcticus, son 1984; Kock 1992; Kellermann 1996). South of the Cyclothone kobayashii and Notolepis coatsi. These were Polar Front, the majority of meso- and bathypelagic replaced over the shelf by notothenioids, primarily Ple- fishes have circum-Antarctic distributions (McGinnis uragramma antarcticum. Pelagic biomass was low and 1982; Gon and Heemstra 1990). Taken collectively, the concentrated below 500 m. The demersal assemblage fishes are significant contributors to the pelagic biomass was characteristic of East Antarctica and included seven and are important trophic elements, both as predators species each of Artedidraconidae, Bathydraconidae and and prey (Rowedder 1979; Hopkins and Torres 1989; Channichthyidae, ten species of Nototheniidae, and Lancraft et al. 1989, 1991; Duhamel 1998). Over the three species each of Rajidae and Zoarcidae. Common continental slope and shelf, notothenioids dominate the species were Trematomus eulepidotus (36.5%), T. scotti ichthyofauna (DeWitt 1970). Most members of this (32.0%), Prionodraco evansii (4.9%), T.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish, Crustaceans, Molluscs, Etc Capture Production by Species Items Atlantic, Antarctic C-48 Poissons, Crustacés, Mollusques
    457 Fish, crustaceans, molluscs, etc Capture production by species items Atlantic, Antarctic C-48 Poissons, crustacés, mollusques, etc Captures par catégories d'espèces Atlantique, Antarctique (a) Peces, crustáceos, moluscos, etc Capturas por categorías de especies Atlántico, Antártico English name Scientific name Species group Nom anglais Nom scientifique Groupe d'espèces 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Nombre inglés Nombre científico Grupo de especies t t t t t t t Lefteye flounders nei Bothidae 31 - - 0 - - - - Antarctic armless flounder Mancopsetta maculata 31 - - 0 - - - - Smalleye moray cod Muraenolepis microps 32 - - 0 - 0 - - Moray cods nei Muraenolepis spp 32 - 0 0 - - - - Blue antimora Antimora rostrata 32 1 0 - 0 - 4 8 Whitson's grenadier Macrourus whitsoni 32 - - 1 0 - - - Grenadiers nei Macrourus spp 32 17 13 2 6 - 59 66 Roundnose grenadier Coryphaenoides rupestris 32 - - - - 9 - - Marbled rockcod Notothenia rossii 33 - 0 0 0 5 - - Humped rockcod Notothenia gibberifrons 33 - 5 1 2 1 - - Yellowbelly rockcod Notothenia neglecta 33 - 0 - 2 - - - Grey rockcod Notothenia squamifrons 33 - 5 5 0 0 - - Painted notie Nototheniops larseni 33 - - 0 - 0 - - Yellowfin notie Nototheniops nudifrons 33 - - 0 0 - - - Antarctic rockcods nei Trematomus spp 33 - 0 - 0 - - - Striped rockcod Pagothenia hansoni 33 - - 0 - - - - Antarctic silverfish Pleuragramma antarcticum 33 - - - 0 - - - Antarctic rockcods, noties nei Nototheniidae 33 1 - - 0 10 0 0 Nichol's lanternfish Gymnoscopelus nicholsi 34 - - 0 - 0 - - Lanternfishes nei Myctophidae
    [Show full text]
  • Observer Reports for by Industry
    Observer Programmes Best Practice, Funding Options and North Sea Case Study WWF’s mission is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by: • conserving the world’s biological diversity • ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable • reducing pollution and wasteful consumption Printed on recycled paper. Observer Programmes WWF European Policy Office (EPO) Brussels (BE) 36 Avenue de Tervuren B-12 1040 Brussels Belguim t: +32 2 743 88 00 Best Practice f: +32 2 743 88 19 Funding Options www.panda.org/epo and North Sea Case Study Photo © Sue SCOTT WWF 444592_Cover.indd4592_Cover.indd 1 113/7/063/7/06 118:00:248:00:24 © WWF UK 2006 National Library of Scotland catalogue entry: Observer Programmes Best Practice, Funding Options and North Sea Case Study. A Report to WWF by Marine Resources Assessment Group (MRAG) Published by WWF UK Designed by Ian Kirkwood Design www.ik-design.co.uk Printed by Woods of Perth Original report completed December 2004 For more information contact: [email protected] WWF European Policy Office (EPO) Brussels (BE) 36 Avenue de Tervuren B-12 1040 Brussels Belguim t: +32 2 743 88 00 f: +32 2 743 88 19 www.panda.org/epo WWF-UK registered charity number 1081274 A company limited by guarantee number 4016274 Panda symbol © 1986 WWF World Wide Fund for Nature (formerly World Wildlife Fund) ® WWF registered trademark Front Cover Photo: © Sue SCOTT 444592_Cover.indd4592_Cover.indd 2 118/7/068/7/06 119:06:449:06:44 AT SEA OBSERVER PROGRAMME REVIEW Observer Programmes Best Practice Funding Options and North Sea Case Study A Report to WWF by Marine Resources Assessment Group (MRAG) 1 444592_p1_7.indd4592_p1_7.indd 1 113/7/063/7/06 116:24:426:24:42 AT SEA OBSERVER PROGRAMME REVIEW AT SEA OBSERVER PROGRAMME REVIEW Table of Contents Page 1 Executive summary 4 2 Introduction 8 2.1 Purpose of Study.
    [Show full text]
  • Observer Programmes Best Practice, Funding Options and North Sea Case Study
    Observer Programmes Best Practice, Funding Options and North Sea Case Study WWF’s mission is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by: • conserving the world’s biological diversity • ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable • reducing pollution and wasteful consumption Printed on recycled paper. Observer Programmes WWF European Policy Office (EPO) Brussels (BE) 36 Avenue de Tervuren B-12 1040 Brussels Belguim t: +32 2 743 88 00 Best Practice f: +32 2 743 88 19 Funding Options www.panda.org/epo and North Sea Case Study Photo © Sue SCOTT WWF 444592_Cover.indd4592_Cover.indd 1 113/7/063/7/06 118:00:248:00:24 © WWF UK 2006 National Library of Scotland catalogue entry: Observer Programmes Best Practice, Funding Options and North Sea Case Study. A Report to WWF by Marine Resources Assessment Group (MRAG) Published by WWF UK Designed by Ian Kirkwood Design www.ik-design.co.uk Printed by Woods of Perth Original report completed December 2004 For more information contact: [email protected] WWF European Policy Office (EPO) Brussels (BE) 36 Avenue de Tervuren B-12 1040 Brussels Belguim t: +32 2 743 88 00 f: +32 2 743 88 19 www.panda.org/epo WWF-UK registered charity number 1081274 A company limited by guarantee number 4016274 Panda symbol © 1986 WWF World Wide Fund for Nature (formerly World Wildlife Fund) ® WWF registered trademark Front Cover Photo: © Sue SCOTT 444592_Cover.indd4592_Cover.indd 2 118/7/068/7/06 119:06:449:06:44 AT SEA OBSERVER PROGRAMME REVIEW Observer Programmes Best Practice Funding Options and North Sea Case Study A Report to WWF by Marine Resources Assessment Group (MRAG) 1 444592_p1_7.indd4592_p1_7.indd 1 113/7/063/7/06 116:24:426:24:42 AT SEA OBSERVER PROGRAMME REVIEW AT SEA OBSERVER PROGRAMME REVIEW Table of Contents Page 1 Executive summary 4 2 Introduction 8 2.1 Purpose of Study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fish Component of Pygoscelis Penguin Diets by Nina J Karnovsky
    The fish component of Pygoscelis penguin diets by Nina J Karnovsky A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences Montana State University © Copyright by Nina J Karnovsky (1997) Abstract: Long-term research on the breeding biology and foraging ecology of Antarctic seabirds has shown that these birds are excellent indicators of the environmental conditions of the Southern Ocean marine ecosystem. Since 1976 three species of penguins, the gentoo, Adelie and chinstrap, have been studied on King George Island, Antarctica. The coexistence of the three species during their breeding season could be a result of species-specific differences in prey, foraging habitat and/or feeding behavior. Previous studies have shown that krill is the major component of the diet of all three species. The importance of fish in their diet has been underestimated and not well understood. The objective of this study was to analyze which kinds of fish species, and to what extent, the different penguins rely on fish. I examined interspecific, intraspecific differences in the piscivorous portion of diet of the three penguin species. These data will be used for examinations of interannual variation in the penguin diets in the future. Changes in the percentage of, or a shift in species assemblages of fish eaten (preyswitching) could reflect variations in environmental conditions. Such a change might be expected because krill populations have declined in the past decade due to a decrease in winter sea ice. Krill depend on sea-ice for protection from predators and for feeding on the ice-algae populations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Fishery Observer Attitudes and Experiences Survey
    National Observer Program 2016 Fishery Observer Attitudes and Experiences Survey NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-186 U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | National Marine Fisheries Service National Observer Program 2016 Fishery Observer Attitudes and Experiences Survey Yuntao Wang and Jane DiCosimo NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-186 APRIL 2019 U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Neil A. Jacobs, Ph.D. Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Environmental Observation and Prediction, performing the nonexclusive duties and functions of Under Secretary and NOAA Administrator National Marine Fisheries Service Chris Oliver, Assistant Administrator for Fisheries Recommended Citation: Wang, Y. and DiCosimo, J. 2019. National Observer Program 2016 Fishery Observer Attitudes and Experiences Survey. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/SPO-186, 50 p. Copies of this report may be obtained from: National Observer Program Office of Science & Technology National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 1315 East-West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Or online at: http://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/tech-memos ii 2016 Fishery Observer Attitudes and Experiences Survey Contents Table of Figures iv Acknowledgments v Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 3 2. Survey Methodology 4 3. Survey Responses and Discussion 7 3.1 Observer Demographics and Background 7 3.2 Job Satisfaction 9 3.2.1 Satisfaction with NOAA Fisheries Staff 10 3.2.2 Satisfaction with Provider Companies 10 3.2.3 Satisfaction with Captains and/or Crew 11 3.2.4 Satisfaction with Time Spent Deployed Per Month 12 3.3 Observing as a Career 13 3.4 Harassment and Incident Reporting 15 3.5 International Observing Experience 17 3.6 Regional Questions 18 3.6.1 Alaska Region 18 3.6.2 Greater Atlantic Region 20 3.6.3 West Coast Region 21 3.7 Usage of Electronic Technology 21 3.8 Follow-up Interviews and General Comments 22 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial DNA, Morphology, and the Phylogenetic Relationships of Antarctic Icefishes
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 28 (2003) 87–98 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Mitochondrial DNA, morphology, and the phylogenetic relationships of Antarctic icefishes (Notothenioidei: Channichthyidae) Thomas J. Near,a,* James J. Pesavento,b and Chi-Hing C. Chengb a Center for Population Biology, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA b Department of Animal Biology, 515 Morrill Hall, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA Received 10 July 2002; revised 4 November 2002 Abstract The Channichthyidae is a lineage of 16 species in the Notothenioidei, a clade of fishes that dominate Antarctic near-shore marine ecosystems with respect to both diversity and biomass. Among four published studies investigating channichthyid phylogeny, no two have produced the same tree topology, and no published study has investigated the degree of phylogenetic incongruence be- tween existing molecular and morphological datasets. In this investigation we present an analysis of channichthyid phylogeny using complete gene sequences from two mitochondrial genes (ND2 and 16S) sampled from all recognized species in the clade. In addition, we have scored all 58 unique morphological characters used in three previous analyses of channichthyid phylogenetic relationships. Data partitions were analyzed separately to assess the amount of phylogenetic resolution provided by each dataset, and phylogenetic incongruence among data partitions was investigated using incongruence length difference (ILD) tests. We utilized a parsimony- based version of the Shimodaira–Hasegawa test to determine if alternative tree topologies are significantly different from trees resulting from maximum parsimony analysis of the combined partition dataset. Our results demonstrate that the greatest phylo- genetic resolution is achieved when all molecular and morphological data partitions are combined into a single maximum parsimony analysis.
    [Show full text]