Chapter 7 References

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 7 References Chapter 7 References Bellinger, E. and D. Sigee. 2015. Freshwater Algae, Second Edition. Identification, Enumeration, and Use as Bioindicators. John Wiley & Sons, LTD., West Sussex, UK. Boedeker, C., C. J. O’Kelly, W. Star, and F. Leliaert. 2012. Molecular phylogeny and taxonomy of the Aegagropila clade (Cladophorales, Ulvophyceae), including the description of Aegagropilopsis gen. nov. and Pseudocladophora gen. nov. J. Phycology, 48:808–825. Brodie, J. and J. Lewis. 2007. Unravelling the Algae; the Past, Present, and Future of Algal Systematics. The Systematics Association Special Volume Series #75, CRC Press, New York, NY. Caisova,´ L., B. Marin, N. Sausen, T. Proschold, and M. Melkonian. 2011. Polyphyly of Chaetophora and Stigeoclonium within the Chaetophorales (Chlorophyceae), revealed by sequence comparisons of nuclear-encoded SSU rRNA genes. Journal of Phycology 47: 164–177. Dillard, G. E. 1989a. Freshwater Algae of the Southeastern United States. Part 1. Chlorophyceae: Volvocales, Tetrasporales and Chlorococcales. J. Cramer Publishers, Berlin GE. Dillard, G. E. 1989b. Freshwater Algae of the Southeastern United States. Part 2. Chlorophyceae: Ulotrichales, Microsporales, Cylindrocapsales, 787 788 CHAPTER 7. REFERENCES Sphaeropleales, Chaetophorales, Cladophorales, Schizogoniales, Siphonales and Oedogonales. J. Cramer Publishers, Berlin GE. Dillard, G. E. 2008. Common Freshwater Algae of the United States. An Illustrated Key to the Genera (Excluding the Diatoms). J. Cramer Publishers, Berlin, GE. EPA. 2010. Standard Operating Procedure for Phytoplankton Analysis, LG401, Revision 05, February 2010. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D. C. Ettl, H. and G. Gartner.¨ 1988. Sußwasserflora¨ von Mitteleuropa, Chlorophyta II. Tetrasporales, Chlorococcales, Gloeodendrales. Springer Spektrum, Heidelberg, Germany. Graham, L. E., J. M. Graham, L. W. Wilcox, and M. E. Cook. 2016. Algae, Third Edition. LJLM Press, LLC (eBook), www.ljlmpress.com. Guiry, M. D. and Guiry, G. M. 2016. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. www.algaebase. org. Hillebrand, H., C-D. Durselen,¨ D. Kirschtel, U. Pollingher, and T. Zohary. 1999. Biovolume calculations for pelagic and benthic microalgae. J. Phycology 35: 403–424. Hoham, R. W. 1974. New findings in the life history of the snow alga, Chlainomonas rubra (Stein et Brooke) comb. nov. (Chlorophyta, Volvocales). Syesis 7:239–247. Hoham, R. W., S. C. Roemer, and J. E. Mullet. 1979. The life history and ecology of the snow alga Chloromonas brevispina comb. nov. (Chlorophyta, Volvocales). Phycologia 18:55–70. John, D. M., B. A. Whitton, and A. J. Brook. 2011. The Freshwater Algal Flora of the British Isles: An Identification Guide to Freshwater and Terrestrial Algae. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK. Kearns, K. D. and M. D. Hunter. 2001. Toxin-producing Anabaena flos-aquae induces settling of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, a competing motile alga. Microbial Ecology 42: 80–86. 789 Lee, R. E. 2008. Phycology, Fourth Edition. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. Novis, P. M., M. Lorenz, P. A. Broady, and E. A. Flint. 2010. Parallela Flint: its phylogenic position in the chlorophyceae and the polyphyly of Radiofilum Schmidle. Phycologia 49: 373–383.. Olenina, I., S. Hajdu, L. Edler, A. Andersson, N. Wasmund, S. Busch, J. Gobel,¨ S. Gromisz, S. Huseby, M. Huttunen, A. Jaanus, P. Kokkonen, I. Ledaine, and E. Niemkiewicz. 2006. Biovolumes and Size-Classes of Phytoplankton in the Baltic Sea. Baltic Sea Environment Proceeding No. 106, Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission, Helsinki, Finland. Olrik, K. 1998. Ecology of mixotrophic flagellates with special reference to Chrysophyceae in Danish lakes. Hydrobiologia 369/370: 329–338. Prescott, G. W. 1962. Algae of the Western Great Lakes Area, Revised Edition. WM. C. Brown Company Publishers, Dubuque, IO. Proschold,¨ T., T. Darienko, P. C. Silva, W. Reisser, and L. Krienitx. 2011. The systematics of Zoochlorella revisited employing an integrative approach. Environmental Microbiology 13:350–364. Ramananthan, K.R. 1964. Ulotrichales. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Monographs on Algae, New Delhi Smith, G. M. 1944. A comparative study of the species of Volvox. Trans. Amer. Micro. Soc. 63: 265–310. Sun, J. and D. Liu. 2003. Geometric models for calculating cell biovolume and surface area for phytoplankton. J. Plankton Research 25: 1331–1346. van Beem, A. P. and J. Simons. 1988. Growth and morphology of Draparnaldia mutabilis (Chlorophyceae, Chaetophorales) in synthetic medium. British Phycology J. 23: 143–151. Wehr, J. D., R. G. Sheath, and J. P. Kociolek. 2015. Freshwater Algae of North America: Ecology and classification, Second Edition. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. 790 CHAPTER 7. REFERENCES Yamada, T., K. Miyaji, and J. Nozaki. 2008. A taxonomic study of Eudorina unicocca (Volvocaceae, Chlorophyceae) and related species, based on morphology and molecular phylogeny. European Journal of Phycology, 43: 317–326..
Recommended publications
  • Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016
    Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016 April 1981 Revised, May 1982 2nd revision, April 1983 3rd revision, December 1999 4th revision, May 2011 Prepared for U.S. Department of Commerce Ohio Department of Natural Resources National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Division of Wildlife Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. G Estuarine Reserves Division Columbus, Ohio 1305 East West Highway 43229-6693 Silver Spring, MD 20910 This management plan has been developed in accordance with NOAA regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Ohio Coastal Management Program. OWC NERR Management Plan, 2011 - 2016 Acknowledgements This management plan was prepared by the staff and Advisory Council of the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve (OWC NERR), in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources-Division of Wildlife. Participants in the planning process included: Manager, Frank Lopez; Research Coordinator, Dr. David Klarer; Coastal Training Program Coordinator, Heather Elmer; Education Coordinator, Ann Keefe; Education Specialist Phoebe Van Zoest; and Office Assistant, Gloria Pasterak. Other Reserve staff including Dick Boyer and Marje Bernhardt contributed their expertise to numerous planning meetings. The Reserve is grateful for the input and recommendations provided by members of the Old Woman Creek NERR Advisory Council. The Reserve is appreciative of the review, guidance, and council of Division of Wildlife Executive Administrator Dave Scott and the mapping expertise of Keith Lott and the late Steve Barry.
    [Show full text]
  • Lateral Gene Transfer of Anion-Conducting Channelrhodopsins Between Green Algae and Giant Viruses
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.15.042127; this version posted April 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 5 Lateral gene transfer of anion-conducting channelrhodopsins between green algae and giant viruses Andrey Rozenberg 1,5, Johannes Oppermann 2,5, Jonas Wietek 2,3, Rodrigo Gaston Fernandez Lahore 2, Ruth-Anne Sandaa 4, Gunnar Bratbak 4, Peter Hegemann 2,6, and Oded 10 Béjà 1,6 1Faculty of Biology, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel. 2Institute for Biology, Experimental Biophysics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 42, Berlin 10115, Germany. 3Present address: Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann 15 Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel. 4Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway. 5These authors contributed equally: Andrey Rozenberg, Johannes Oppermann. 6These authors jointly supervised this work: Peter Hegemann, Oded Béjà. e-mail: [email protected] ; [email protected] 20 ABSTRACT Channelrhodopsins (ChRs) are algal light-gated ion channels widely used as optogenetic tools for manipulating neuronal activity 1,2. Four ChR families are currently known. Green algal 3–5 and cryptophyte 6 cation-conducting ChRs (CCRs), cryptophyte anion-conducting ChRs (ACRs) 7, and the MerMAID ChRs 8. Here we 25 report the discovery of a new family of phylogenetically distinct ChRs encoded by marine giant viruses and acquired from their unicellular green algal prasinophyte hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genome of Prasinoderma Coloniale Unveils the Existence of a Third Phylum Within Green Plants
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 10, 2021 The genome of Prasinoderma coloniale unveils the existence of a third phylum within green plants Li, Linzhou; Wang, Sibo; Wang, Hongli; Sahu, Sunil Kumar; Marin, Birger; Li, Haoyuan; Xu, Yan; Liang, Hongping; Li, Zhen; Cheng, Shifeng Total number of authors: 24 Published in: Nature Ecology & Evolution Link to article, DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-1221-7 Publication date: 2020 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Li, L., Wang, S., Wang, H., Sahu, S. K., Marin, B., Li, H., Xu, Y., Liang, H., Li, Z., Cheng, S., Reder, T., Çebi, Z., Wittek, S., Petersen, M., Melkonian, B., Du, H., Yang, H., Wang, J., Wong, G. K. S., ... Liu, H. (2020). The genome of Prasinoderma coloniale unveils the existence of a third phylum within green plants. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4, 1220-1231. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1221-7 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny and Taxonomic Revision of Chaetophoralean Algae (Chlorophyta)
    University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice Faculty of Science Molecular phylogeny and taxonomic revision of chaetophoralean algae (Chlorophyta) Ph.D. Thesis Mgr. Lenka Caisová Supervisor RNDr. Jiří Neustupa, Ph.D. Department of Botany, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University in Prague Formal supervisor Prof. RNDr. Jiří Komárek, DrSc. University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences, Třeboň Consultants Prof. Dr. Michael Melkonian Biozentrum Köln, Botanisches Institut, Universität zu Köln, Germany Mgr. Pavel Škaloud, Ph.D. Department of Botany, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University in Prague České Budějovice, 2011 Caisová, L. 2011: Molecular phylogeny and taxonomic revision of chaetophoralean algae (Chlorophyta). PhD. Thesis, composite in English. University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, České Budějovice, Czech Republic, 110 pp, shortened version 30 pp. Annotation Since the human inclination to estimate and trace natural diversity, usable species definitions as well as taxonomical systems are required. As a consequence, the first proposed classification schemes assigned the filamentous and parenchymatous taxa to the green algal order Chaetophorales sensu Wille. The introduction of ultrastructural and molecular methods provided novel insight into algal evolution and generated taxonomic revisions based on phylogenetic inference. However, until now, the number of molecular phylogenetic studies focusing on the Chaetophorales s.s. is surprisingly low. To enhance knowledge about phylogenetic
    [Show full text]
  • Chloroplast Phylogenomic Analysis of Chlorophyte Green Algae Identifies a Novel Lineage Sister to the Sphaeropleales (Chlorophyceae) Claude Lemieux*, Antony T
    Lemieux et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2015) 15:264 DOI 10.1186/s12862-015-0544-5 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Chloroplast phylogenomic analysis of chlorophyte green algae identifies a novel lineage sister to the Sphaeropleales (Chlorophyceae) Claude Lemieux*, Antony T. Vincent, Aurélie Labarre, Christian Otis and Monique Turmel Abstract Background: The class Chlorophyceae (Chlorophyta) includes morphologically and ecologically diverse green algae. Most of the documented species belong to the clade formed by the Chlamydomonadales (also called Volvocales) and Sphaeropleales. Although studies based on the nuclear 18S rRNA gene or a few combined genes have shed light on the diversity and phylogenetic structure of the Chlamydomonadales, the positions of many of the monophyletic groups identified remain uncertain. Here, we used a chloroplast phylogenomic approach to delineate the relationships among these lineages. Results: To generate the analyzed amino acid and nucleotide data sets, we sequenced the chloroplast DNAs (cpDNAs) of 24 chlorophycean taxa; these included representatives from 16 of the 21 primary clades previously recognized in the Chlamydomonadales, two taxa from a coccoid lineage (Jenufa) that was suspected to be sister to the Golenkiniaceae, and two sphaeroplealeans. Using Bayesian and/or maximum likelihood inference methods, we analyzed an amino acid data set that was assembled from 69 cpDNA-encoded proteins of 73 core chlorophyte (including 33 chlorophyceans), as well as two nucleotide data sets that were generated from the 69 genes coding for these proteins and 29 RNA-coding genes. The protein and gene phylogenies were congruent and robustly resolved the branching order of most of the investigated lineages. Within the Chlamydomonadales, 22 taxa formed an assemblage of five major clades/lineages.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Algae in Britain and Ireland - Bibliography
    Freshwater algae in Britain and Ireland - Bibliography Floras, monographs, articles with records and environmental information, together with papers dealing with taxonomic/nomenclatural changes since 2003 (previous update of ‘Coded List’) as well as those helpful for identification purposes. Theses are listed only where available online and include unpublished information. Useful websites are listed at the end of the bibliography. Further links to relevant information (catalogues, websites, photocatalogues) can be found on the site managed by the British Phycological Society (http://www.brphycsoc.org/links.lasso). Abbas A, Godward MBE (1964) Cytology in relation to taxonomy in Chaetophorales. Journal of the Linnean Society, Botany 58: 499–597. Abbott J, Emsley F, Hick T, Stubbins J, Turner WB, West W (1886) Contributions to a fauna and flora of West Yorkshire: algae (exclusive of Diatomaceae). Transactions of the Leeds Naturalists' Club and Scientific Association 1: 69–78, pl.1. Acton E (1909) Coccomyxa subellipsoidea, a new member of the Palmellaceae. Annals of Botany 23: 537–573. Acton E (1916a) On the structure and origin of Cladophora-balls. New Phytologist 15: 1–10. Acton E (1916b) On a new penetrating alga. New Phytologist 15: 97–102. Acton E (1916c) Studies on the nuclear division in desmids. 1. Hyalotheca dissiliens (Smith) Bréb. Annals of Botany 30: 379–382. Adams J (1908) A synopsis of Irish algae, freshwater and marine. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 27B: 11–60. Ahmadjian V (1967) A guide to the algae occurring as lichen symbionts: isolation, culture, cultural physiology and identification. Phycologia 6: 127–166 Allanson BR (1973) The fine structure of the periphyton of Chara sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Cryogenian Glacial Habitats As a Plant Terrestrialization Cradle – the Origin of Anydrophyta and Zygnematophyceae Split
    Cryogenian glacial habitats as a plant terrestrialization cradle – the origin of Anydrophyta and Zygnematophyceae split Jakub Žárský1*, Vojtěch Žárský2,3, Martin Hanáček4,5, Viktor Žárský6,7 1CryoEco research group, Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Praha, Czechia 2Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, 3529-6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada 3Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, BIOCEV, Průmyslová 595, 25242 Vestec, Czechia 4Polar-Geo-Lab, Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 267/2, 611 37 Brno, Czechia 5Regional Museum in Jeseník, Zámecké náměstí 1, 790 01 Jeseník, Czechia 6Laboratory of Cell Biology, Institute of Experimental Botany of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czechia 7Department of Experimental Plant Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia * Correspondence: [email protected] Keywords: Plant evolution, Cryogenian glaciation, Streptophyta, Charophyta, Anydrophyta, Zygnematophyceae, Embryophyta, Snowball Earth. Abstract For tens of millions of years (Ma) the terrestrial habitats of Snowball Earth during the Cryogenian period (between 720 to 635 Ma before present - Neoproterozoic Era) were possibly dominated by global snow and ice cover up to the equatorial sublimative desert. The most recent time-calibrated phylogenies calibrated not only on plants, but on a comprehensive set of eukaryotes, indicate within the Streptophyta, multicellular Charophyceae evolved
    [Show full text]
  • An Unrecognized Ancient Lineage of Green Plants Persists in Deep Marine Waters
    FAU Institutional Repository http://purl.fcla.edu/fau/fauir This paper was submitted by the faculty of FAU’s Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute. Notice: ©2010 Phycological Society of America. This manuscript is an author version with the final publication available at http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/ and may be cited as: Zechman, F. W., Verbruggen, H., Leliaert, F., Ashworth, M., Buchheim, M. A., Fawley, M. W., Spalding, H., Pueschel, C. M., Buchheim, J. A., Verghese, B., & Hanisak, M. D. (2010). An unrecognized ancient lineage of green plants persists in deep marine waters. Journal of Phycology, 46(6), 1288‐1295. (Suppl. material). doi:10.1111/j.1529‐8817.2010.00900.x J. Phycol. 46, 1288–1295 (2010) Ó 2010 Phycological Society of America DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2010.00900.x AN UNRECOGNIZED ANCIENT LINEAGE OF GREEN PLANTS PERSISTS IN DEEP MARINE WATERS1 Frederick W. Zechman2,3 Department of Biology, California State University Fresno, 2555 East San Ramon Ave, Fresno, California 93740, USA Heroen Verbruggen,3 Frederik Leliaert Phycology Research Group, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 S8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium Matt Ashworth University Station MS A6700, 311 Biological Laboratories, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA Mark A. Buchheim Department of Biological Science, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74104, USA Marvin W. Fawley School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, University of Arkansas at Monticello, Monticello, Arkansas 71656, USA Department of Biological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58105, USA Heather Spalding Botany Department, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA Curt M. Pueschel Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, New York 13901, USA Julie A.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Genbank on That Full Plastid Genomes Are Not Sufficient to Reject Al- February 28, 2012
    Ruhfel et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2014, 14:23 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/14/23 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access From algae to angiosperms–inferring the phylogeny of green plants (Viridiplantae) from 360 plastid genomes Brad R Ruhfel1*, Matthew A Gitzendanner2,3,4, Pamela S Soltis3,4, Douglas E Soltis2,3,4 and J Gordon Burleigh2,4 Abstract Background: Next-generation sequencing has provided a wealth of plastid genome sequence data from an increasingly diverse set of green plants (Viridiplantae). Although these data have helped resolve the phylogeny of numerous clades (e.g., green algae, angiosperms, and gymnosperms), their utility for inferring relationships across all green plants is uncertain. Viridiplantae originated 700-1500 million years ago and may comprise as many as 500,000 species. This clade represents a major source of photosynthetic carbon and contains an immense diversity of life forms, including some of the smallest and largest eukaryotes. Here we explore the limits and challenges of inferring a comprehensive green plant phylogeny from available complete or nearly complete plastid genome sequence data. Results: We assembled protein-coding sequence data for 78 genes from 360 diverse green plant taxa with complete or nearly complete plastid genome sequences available from GenBank. Phylogenetic analyses of the plastid data recovered well-supported backbone relationships and strong support for relationships that were not observed in previous analyses of major subclades within Viridiplantae. However, there also is evidence of systematic error in some analyses. In several instances we obtained strongly supported but conflicting topologies from analyses of nucleotides versus amino acid characters, and the considerable variation in GC content among lineages and within single genomes affected the phylogenetic placement of several taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • (Chaetophoraceae; Chlorophyta) in Culture
    Actaßot. Neerl. 145-149. 33(2),May 1984, p, Morphological growth response of Draparnaldia (Chaetophoraceae; Chlorophyta) in culture G.M. Lokhorst Rijksherbarium, Schelpenkade6,2313 ZT Leiden Draparnaldia Bory is a genus of branched filamentous green algae which em- braces about 20 species. Its distributional pattern includes stable to ephemeral fresh water habitats including acid or alkaline conditions. It is sensitive to pollu- to be for the of natural fresh tion, hence it appears appropriate typification water systems. For example, in the saprobic system of Fjerdingstad (1964) Draparnaldia glomerata is employed as a biological indicator of oligosaprobic waters, while Draparnaldia plumosa defines water of katharobic status. Based ultrastructural with Stigeoclonium, on, e.g., grounds Draparnaldia together Fritschiella and Uronema constitute the very homogeneous Chaetophoraceae al. in (Barker & Lokhorst in press, Lokhorst et press). In its natural habitat, the alga demonstrates a conspicuous main axis con- cells from which alternate sisting of barrel-shaped or cylindrical opposite, or whorled fascicles of setiferous branchlets project (Prescott 1951). However, when this alga is brought into culture, its phenotypic plasticity is expressed by loss in to main rise to a gradual ability produce axes, thereby giving a Stigeoclo- nium-like growth habit (e.g., Carroll & Deason 1969; personal observations). Several experimental studies attempted to decipher the causes of this poly- morphism in Draparnaldia. Uspenskaja (1930) concluded that an increase of the nitrate level, both in natural environment and in culture, accounts for the morphological change in Draparnaldia. In additional studies, Suomalainen that an increase of both and C0 -concentration (1933) reported light intensity 2 promotes main axis development, the frequency ofbranching and the formation of setae in this alga.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Systematics of the Green Algae
    7989_C007.fm Page 123 Monday, June 25, 2007 8:57 PM Systematics of the green 7 algae: conflict of classic and modern approaches Thomas Pröschold and Frederik Leliaert CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................................124 How are green algae classified? ........................................................................................125 The morphological concept ...............................................................................................125 The ultrastructural concept ................................................................................................125 The molecular concept (phylogenetic concept).................................................................131 Classic versus modern approaches: problems with identification of species and genera.....................................................................................................................134 Taxonomic revision of genera and species using polyphasic approaches....................................139 Polyphasic approaches used for characterization of the genera Oogamochlamys and Lobochlamys....................................................................................140 Delimiting phylogenetic species by a multi-gene approach in Micromonas and Halimeda .....................................................................................................................143 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................................144
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Periphyton Monitoring Manual Stream Periphyton Monitoring Manual
    Stream Periphyton Monitoring Manual Stream Periphyton Monitoring Manual Prepared for The New Zealand Ministry for the Environment by Barry J. F. Biggs Cathy Kilroy NIWA, Christchurch Published by: NIWA, P.O. Box 8602, Christchurch, New Zealand (Phone: 03 348 8987 Fax: 03 348 5548) for the New Zealand Ministry for the Environment ISBN 0-478-09099-4 Stream Periphyton Monitoring Manual Biggs, B.J.F. Kilroy, C. © The Crown (acting through the Minister for the Environment), 2000. Copyright exists in this work in accordance with the Copyright Act 1994. However, the Crown authorises and grants a licence for the copying, adaptation and issuing of this work for any non-profit purpose. All applications for reproduction of this work for any other purpose should be made to the Ministry for the Environment. Stream Periphyton Monitoring Manual Contents Summary of figures ....................................................................................................................................vi Summary of tables ................................................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................................... x 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]