DOCSLIB.ORG

Ontario's Agri-Food Research Stations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AUTUMN 2018 Ontario’s Agricultural Research Stations Muck Crops Research Station PHOTO: ZACHARIAH TELFER A vital bridge for agri-food innovation nnovation fuels economic development, of the stations have the capacity for integrated job creation, and trade across the agri-food agronomy and livestock trials, to enable multi- I sector. A world-class network of field stations, disciplinary research. managed by the University of Guelph, powers this Extensive new infrastructure is either complete innovation in the Province of Ontario. or underway in this network. These include a Cutting-edge research is field-tested at a highly $15-million investment in the beef research facility developed network of research stations commit- and a $25-million investment in the dairy research ted to the competitiveness and prosperity of the facility, both part of the Elora Research Station. province’s $37-billion-plus agri-food sector. The poultry facility in the Arkell Research Station These research stations, owned by the has also undergone renovations to improve animal Agricultural Research Institute of Ontario and welfare by incorporating non-caged and enriched administered by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, caging systems. Food and Rural Affairs, are operated and managed The real-world field tests conducted at these by the University of Guelph through the OMAFRA- research stations promote agri-food discoveries, U of G Agreement. validate laboratory findings, stimulate further In total, there are almost two dozen facilities research and provide valuable information for within the research stations, each supporting a Ontario’s agri-food sector. different globally competitive platform. Several Muck Crops Research Station Located in the Bradford/Holland marsh, this station has four hectares of muck soil plots on site containing 60–70 per cent organic matter, and two hectares of mineral soil nearby. Research involves developing new varieties and pest management techniques for onions, carrots, lettuce, celery and Asian vegetables. New Liskeard Research Station This 295-hectare, multi-unit station focuses on northern agronomy and horticulture, beef research, and includes a clean-plant propagation facility supporting the production of potato and other horticultural crops. A new field crop research service building is to be constructed on site. Alma Aquaculture Research Station With 10 buildings and training Emo Agriculture programs from high-school Research Station Emo’s clay loam soil is used for to graduate levels, Alma has developing field crops suited for supported more than 200 cultivation in northern Ontario. projects on aquatic livestock, Research projects focus on cultivar water delivery systems, evaluation, renewable fuel, fibre genetics, animal welfare crops, crop nutrition and new and nutrition. PHOTO: ALMA AQUACULTURE RESEARCH STATION species evaluation. Guelph Research Station Cedar Springs Focusing on environmental Research Station sustainability, this 120-hectare At the Cedar Springs station, station focuses on turfgrass, Elora Research Station This multi-purpose station research focuses on fruit crop pesticide impact, non-chemical contains state-of-the-art trials, including apples, grapes and pest control, planting methods beef and dairy facilities, as berry varieties. This 12-hectare and field management programs. well as 130 hectares of tile horticultural crop station has drained land for field crop led the field in studies of apple Huron Research Station research. Novel precision performance under stress. This This field crop station has 50 agriculture tools improve and research station is affiliated with hectares of cultivated land for better utilize housing, grazing, Ridgetown Campus. research in weed management trials, robotic milking systems and and agronomic studies of dry bean automated feeding. and soybean. This research station PHOTO: BEEF FARMERS OF ONTARIO is affiliated with Ridgetown Campus. 2 Ontario’s Agri-Food Research Stations at the University of Guelph Ponsonby Research Station This bio-secure facility contains a flock of specific pathogen-free sheep that provide unique research opportunities. Other livestock on site include swine, beef and dairy cows and research ranging from genetics to environment. Ponsonby provides temporary housing for animals from other research locations when needed. Ridgetown Campus Research here is conducted on campus and at the associated Arkell Research Station Cedar Springs and Huron The Arkell station features three research units dedicated to equine, Research facilities, on 240 poultry and swine studies. Each unit focuses on research about hectares of land in total. Research housing, reproduction, genetics and behaviour. PHOTO: MIDO MELEBARI focuses on crop production, pest management, production, business and economics. Vineland Research and Innovation Centre At Vineland, research is dedicated to horticultural science and innovation. With a total of 90 hectares, this world-class facility contributes to advancements in applied genomics, consumer insights and production systems. Winchester Agriculture Research Station The Winchester station supports research that benefits eastern Ontario. Projects investigate soil and water quality, climate change, nutrient availability and weed management. This station is located on clay loam soil. A new field crop research service building is under construction at the site. Simcoe Research Station Woodstock Research Station The Simcoe Research Station consists of nearly 90 hectares With 150 hectares of land, the of land for research into fruits, Woodstock station focuses vegetables and alternative on plant breeding in corn, crops — such as quinoa, hops soybean, white bean and cereal and hazelnut — that thrive in the crops. Research includes plant unique, highly productive sandy breeding, biotechnology, plant soils north of Lake Erie. physiology, weed control and land PHOTO: MIDO MELEBARI management. Ontario’s Agri-Food Research Stations at the University of Guelph 3 Research-Stations-Map-March2018-cropmarks-new-icon-rev.pdf 1 2018-04-06 4:56 PM Research-Stations-Map-March2018-cropmarks-rev.pdf 1 2018-03-26 9:16 AM Ontario's Agricultural Research Stations University of Guelph research stations and infrastructure are vital for a wide range of Ontario’sinnovative studies, and agriculturaloffer a platform for extension researchand teaching demonstrations. stations These research facilities, owned by the Agricultural Research Institute of Ontario and Research stations and the infrastructure that supports them are vital for a wide range ofadministe innovativered studies,by the Ontario and offer Ministry a platform of Agricultu for extensionre, Food and and teaching Rural A fdemonstrations.fairs are operated Theseand managed research by facilities, the University owned of by Guelph the Agricultural through the Research OMAFRA-U Institute of G of Ag Ontarioreement. and administered by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, are operated and6 managed by theThunder University Bay of Guelph through the OMAFRA-U89 of3 G Agreement. University 1 5 400 6 Thunder Bay of 89Guelph 3 9 University Toronto 1 5 2 400 10 of Guelph 401 Quebec Oakville 9 Guelph 7 Toronto Research Stations 2 10 401 Quebec Guelph OakvilleSudbury 1 Alma 7 Ontario Research Stations Ottawa 2 Arkell Sudbury 14 1 Alma Ontario Guelph KingstonOttawa C 3 Bradford 2 Arkell 14 M Toronto Y 4 Cedar Springs Guelph Kingston C 3 Bradford 8 CM M 15 13 5 Elora Toronto MY London 12 Y 4 Cedar Springs Windsor 8 CY Hamilton CM 6 Emo 15 13 5 Elora CMY London 12 MY 11 Windsor K CY 7 Guelph Research Hamilton 6 Emo 4 Station CMY 11 K 7 Guelph Research 8 Huron 4 Station/Turfgrass Institute 9 New Liskeard Research Station Focus 8 Huron 10 Ponsonby Reseaaquaculturch Stationre Focus horticulture crops 9 New Liskeard beef vegetables 11 Ridgetown aquaculture horticulture crops 10 Ponsonby biomass crops poultry 12 Simcoe beef vegetables 11 Ridgetown dairy sheep 13 Vineland* dairy poultry 12 Simcoe equine swine 14 Winchester equine sheep field crops turfgrass 13 Vineland* field and biomass crops swine 15 Woodstock general animal facility 14 Winchester general animal facility turfgrass * TheThe Vineland Vineland Station Station is operated is operated by Vineland by Research Vineland & Innovation Centre with support from the OMAFRA-U of G Agreement. Research & Innovation Centre with support from the15 OMAFRA-UWoodstock of G Agreement. * The Vineland Station is operated by the uoguelph.ca/research Compiled by Samantha McReavy Editorial Coordination: For more information, contact Vineland Research and InnovationPublished by Centrethe Office withof Research and Alyssa Logan, Students Rebecca Rebus, [email protected] support from the OMAFRA(Agri-Food-U of G Partnership) Agreement. Promoting Awareness of Owen Roberts and Liz Snyder Electronic version available Research Knowledge (SPARK) Design and Layout: in PDF format at 4 Gareth Lind, Lind Design uoguelph.ca/research.
Recommended publications
  • Kenora District Human Capital Series

    Kenora District Human Capital Series

    Northern Projections Kenora District Human Capital Series Dr. Bahktiar Moazzami northernpolicy.ca Huskie the Muskie, McLeod Park, Kenora, ON Northern Policy Institute / Institut des politiques de Nord Kenora District | August 2019 3 Who We Are Northern Policy Institute Northern Policy Institute is Northern Ontario’s independent think tank. We perform research, collect and disseminate evidence, and identify policy opportunities to support the growth of sustainable Northern Communities. Our operations are located in Thunder Bay and Sudbury. We seek to enhance Northern Ontario’s capacity to take the lead position on socio-economic policy that impacts Northern Ontario, Ontario, and Canada as a whole. About the Series This Human Capital Series is an update of an earlier series published in partnership with Northern Ontario Workforce Planning. Workforce Planning Ontario is a network of 26 Workforce Planning Boards covering four regions across the province. Workforce Planning Boards gather intelligence on local labour market supply and demand, and work in partnership with employers, employment services, educators, researchers, economic development, government and other stakeholders to identify, understand and address labour market issues. This includes supporting and coordinating local responses to meet current and emerging workforce needs. Given the unique geography and labour market issues that impact Northern Ontario, all 6 planning boards in the north have collaborated to form Northern Ontario Workforce Planning. They include: Algoma Workforce Investment Corporation (AWIC); Far Northeast Training Board (FNETB); The Labour Market Group (LMG); Northwest Training and Adjustment Board (NTAB); North Superior Workforce Planning Board (NSWPB); and Workforce Planning for Sudbury & Manitoulin (WPSM). FNETB and NSWPB are currently pilot sites for Local Employment Planning Councils (LEPC).
  • 2008-12 Northern Ontario Marketing Strategy

    2008-12 Northern Ontario Marketing Strategy

    Roadmap For Renewal Northern Ontario Tools For Success Five-Year Tourism Marketing Strategy 2008-2012 This project was supported by: The Strategic Tourism Development and Marketing Partnership For Northern Ontario Northern Ontario Five-Year Tourism Marketing Strategy 2008-2012 Submitted to and supported by: The Strategic Tourism Development and Marketing Partnership for Northern Ontario c/o North of Superior Tourism Association Suite 206a, 920 Tungsten Street Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5Z6 Beginning in 2004, the Strategic Tourism Development and Marketing Partnership for Northern Ontario, involving FedNor, the Ontario Tourism Marketing Partnership Corporation (OTMPC) and the Northern Ontario Heritage Fund Corporation (NOHFC), has led to opportunities for collaboration between different levels of government and tourism industry stakeholders and a progressive approach toward tourism development in Northern Ontario. The objectives of the Partnership are to provide strategic support for: • Northern Ontario tourism supplier education and capacity building; • Northern Ontario product development; and • Market-based promotional initiatives that build awareness of and increase visitation to Northern Ontario. Submitted by: Fantail Communications 147 Liberty Street Toronto Ontario M6K 3G3 table of contents Welcome 1 We’re Funneling Down As We Go 1 Let’s Get Started 2 Now Is Our Time 2 Approaching The Challenge 2 Moving Forward 2 What Are The Impacting Issues? 3 Canada’s Ranking As A Destination 3 Travel Forecasts 3 Northern Ontario Tourism Volume Is Declining
  • Northern Ontario Health Equity Strategy a Plan for Achieving Health Equity in the North, by the North, for the North

    Northern Ontario Health Equity Strategy a Plan for Achieving Health Equity in the North, by the North, for the North

    Northern Ontario Health Equity Strategy A plan for achieving health equity in the North, by the North, for the North 1 Table of Contents Forewords 4 Executive Summary 7 Introduction: Health Equity in Northern Ontario 13 A Health Equity Strategy for Northern Ontario 19 Why Does Northern Ontario Need a Health Equity Strategy? 23 What Can Be Done to Improve Health Equity in Northern Ontario? 33 Moving Forward: Impacts 49 Appendix A: Methodological Approach 51 Appendix B: List of Engagement Participants and Partners 54 Appendix C: Northern Ontario Health Equity Steering Committee 57 Endnotes 58 Forewords From Health Quality Ontario’s CEO You can’t truly have a quality health care system without having equitable Guided by leaders in the North, Health Quality Ontario helped facilitate an in- opportunities for health. Equity is one of the six core dimensions of quality depth multi-faceted engagement process with hundreds of people living in the care, along with safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, efficiency, and North that has led to a northern strategy to address health equity in the North, timeliness, and it is a dimension to which Health Quality Ontario has paid focusing on those important barriers and opportunities for building health equity. special attention recently. The Northern Ontario Health Equity Strategy is guided by a vision that all Northern Ontario is one region of the province where health equity is often Northerners will have equitable access to social and economic resources, lacking and needs to be addressed with some urgency. Health in the North: as well as to high-quality health care, regardless of where they live, what they A report on geography and the health of people in Ontario’s two northern regions have or who they are.
  • Northern Ontario Commercial Vehicle Travel Profile

    Northern Ontario Commercial Vehicle Travel Profile

    TRANSPORTATION Final Report The Preparation of a Northern Ontario Passenger and Commercial Vehicle Origin-Destination Survey Northern Ontario Commercial Vehicle Travel Profile Submitted to Ministry of Transportation, Ontario by IBI Group October 30, 2013 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................ ES.1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 1.1 Study Background .............................................................................................. 1 1.2 Report Purpose and Organization .................................................................... 1 1.3 Ontario Commercial Vehicle Survey Program ................................................. 2 1.4 Northern Ontario Commercial Vehicle Survey Background .......................... 2 2. Overview of Commercial Vehicle Travel ............................................. 4 2.1 Truck Traffic Levels ............................................................................................ 5 2.1 Vehicle Styles ...................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Truck Travel Origin-Destination Flows ........................................................... 12 Origin-Destination Flows by Number of Trucks 13 Origin-Destination Flows by Vehicle-Kilometres Travelled 16 Origin-Destination Flows by Commodity Value and Weight 18 2.3 Travel Origin-Destination Flows by Commodity Type .................................
  • Health Profile – Thunder Bay District Integrated District Network

    Health Profile – Thunder Bay District Integrated District Network

    Health Profile – Thunder Bay District Integrated District Network May 2012 North West LHIN RLISS du Nord-Ouest Health Profile for Thunder Bay District Integrated District Network (IDN) Introduction This profile is one of a series of five profiles for each of the proposed Integrated District Networks (IDN)s. Three of the five IDN areas correspond to three of four current sub-LHIN planning areas – Rainy River District, City of Thunder Bay (and surrounding area) and Thunder Bay District (excluding city of Thunder Bay and surrounding area). The fourth and fifth proposed IDNs are formed from the current Kenora District sub-LHIN planning area. The Northern IDN is proposed to encompass Sioux Lookout and all First Nations communities north of Sioux Lookout. The remaining part of Kenora District (including Red Lake, Kenora and Dryden) will be referred to as Kenora District IDN. The map illustrates the North West LHIN’s current sub-LHIN planning areas showing communities that have acute care hospitals. Figure 1: Map of the North West LHIN The Thunder Bay District sub-LHIN planning area of the North West LHIN corresponds to the Thunder Bay District Census Division (CD) excluding the City of Thunder Bay census subdivision and the surrounding census subdivisions of Neebing, Oliver Paipoonge, Conmee, Gillies, O’Connor, Shuniah and Fort William 52. Moving forward, it is proposed that the area will be referred to as the Thunder Bay District Integrated District Network (IDN). Health Profile – Thunder Bay District Integrated District Network (Draft) 2 North West LHIN RLISS du Nord-Ouest The following table presents some of the demographic characteristics of the IDN compared to the total North West LHIN population.
  • Comparison of Business Costs for Northern Ontario Cities

    Comparison of Business Costs for Northern Ontario Cities

    COMPARISON OF BUSINESS COSTS FOR NORTHERN ONTARIO CITIES Prepared for: Prepared by: City of North Bay Economic Development MMK Consulting Inc. Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation Glenn Mair Thunder Bay Community Economic Development Corporation Treena Cook Timmins Economic Development Corporation December 8, 2014 Contents Introduction and methodology........................................ 1 Introduction and objective 1 Study scope 2 Methodology 5 Cost comparison results................................................... 7 Overall results 7 Comparison of selected jurisdictions 8 Results by major sector 9 Results by industry 11 Comparison by cost component .................................... 12 Significance of cost factors 12 Labour costs 13 Facility costs 14 Transportation costs 15 Utilities 17 Financing costs 18 Taxes other than income 18 Income tax 21 Appendix A – Detailed Comparisons ....................................... 23 Introduction and methodology Introduction and objective In March of 2014, KPMG released a major study, Competitive Alternatives, KPMG’s Guide to International Business Location Costs1. That study compared the cost of doing business in more than 100 cities in ten countries, including Canada and the United States. The range of cities included in the Competitive Alternatives 2014 study included Toronto and Sudbury in Ontario, along with 30 other Canadian cities and 74 cities in the US. The municipalities of North Bay, Sault Ste. Marie, Thunder Bay, and Timmins (collectively the “Municipalities”) did not participate as part of the main, published Competitive Alternatives 2014 study. However, the Municipalities now wish to have their communities added to the established comparative analysis, to obtain a better understanding of the costs of doing business in their respective cities relative to other cities regionally, nationally, and cross-border in the US.
  • Anglers in Northern Ontario (RTO13): a Situation Analysis 2

    Anglers in Northern Ontario (RTO13): a Situation Analysis 2

    ANGLERS IN NORTHERN ONTARIO (RTO13) A SITUATION ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PREPARED FOR TOURISM NORTHERN ONTARIO BY Research Resolutions & Consulting Ltd. JUNE 2015 Anglers in Northern Ontario (RTO13): A Situation Analysis 2 INTRODUCTION Northern Ontario offers some of the best fishing in North America and attracts tourists from across the continent to its lakes and rivers. It is a signature experience for the region and a core focus of Tourism Northern Ontario (TNO) and other marketing organizations throughout the North. Because of anglers make a substantial contribution to tourism businesses and tourism revenue throughout the North, TNO commissioned Research Resolutions & Consulting Ltd.1 to undertake a situation analysis of the angling market. This analysis updates and expands the scope of an earlier analysis. 2 The focus of the previous report was anglers who relied on fishing lodges, hotels, motels, commercial cottages and camps for overnight stays in Northern Ontario. By broadening the analysis to include all anglers on overnight trips in Northern Ontario, the full size and tourism economic contribution of sport fishing becomes evident. For example, regardless of whether they camp, stay in a private or a commercial cottage, anglers on overnight trips in the North consume food and beverages purchased in stores and restaurants, fuel their cars and boats at gas stations and marinas, make retail purchases at area stores and pay admissions to local attractions and events. The findings presented in this summary cover all overnight tourists in Northern Ontario who went fishing on their trip, irrespective of the type of lodging they used in the region. The information in the previous report was based on 2010 Statistics Canada data whereas this project relies on the most current available data sources (2012/2013): Statistics Canada’s Travel Survey of Residents of Canada (TSRC – 2012/2013 pooled) and Statistics Canada’s International Travel Survey (ITS US/OVS 2012).
  • Original Article Article Original the Economic Contribution of the Northern Ontario School Of

    Original Article Article Original the Economic Contribution of the Northern Ontario School Of

    Original Article Article original The economic contribution of the Northern Ontario School of Medicine to communities participating in John C. Hogenbirk, MSc Centre for Rural and distributed medical education Northern Health Research, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ont. Introduction: The economic contribution of medical schools to major urban centres can David R. Robinson, PhD be substantial, but there is little information on the contribution to the economy of par- Department of Economics, ticipating communities made by schools that provide education and training away from Laurentian University, major cities and academic health science centres. We sought to assess the economic con- Sudbury, Ont. tribution of the Northern Ontario School of Medicine (NOSM) to northern Ontario Mary Ellen Hill, PhD communities participating in NOSM’s distributed medical education programs. Centre for Rural and Methods: We developed a local economic model and used actual expenditures from Northern Health Research, 2007/08 to assess the economic contribution of NOSM to communities in northern Lakehead University, Ontario. We also estimated the economic contribution of medical students or residents Thunder Bay, Ont. participating in different programs in communities away from the university campus- es. To explore broader economic effects, we conducted semistructured interviews with Raymond W. Pong, PhD leaders in education, health care and politics in northern Ontario. Centre for Rural and Northern Health Research, Results: The total economic contribution to northern Ontario was $67.1 million Laurentian University, based on $36.3 million in spending by NOSM and $1.0 million spent by students. Sudbury, Ont. Economic contributions were greatest in the university campus cities of Thunder Bay ($26.7 million) and Sudbury ($30.4 million), and $0.8–$1.2 million accrued to the Bruce Minore, PhD next 3 largest population centres.
  • Governance in Northern Ontario

    Governance in Northern Ontario

    Commentary No. 15| September 2016 Governance in Northern Ontario: Taking Ownership of the Future By David MacKinnon northernpolicy.ca Who We Are Some of the key players in this model, and their roles, are as follows: President & CEO Charles Cirtwill Board: The Board of Directors sets strategic direction for Northern Policy Institute. Directors serve on operational committees dealing with finance, fundraising and Board of Directors governance, and collectively the Board holds the Martin Bayer (Chair) Dr. George C. Macey CEO accountable for achieving our Strategic Plan Ron Arnold (Vice-Chair & Secretary) goals. The Board’s principal responsibility is to protect Pierre Bélanger Hal J. McGonigal and promote the interests, reputation, and stature of Thérèse Bergeron- Dawn Madahbee Northern Policy Institute. Hopson (Vice Chair) Gerry Munt Terry Bursey Doug Murray (Treasurer) President & CEO: Recommends strategic direction, Dr. Harley d’Entremont Dr. Brian Tucker develops plans and processes, and secures and Alex Freedman allocates resources to achieve it. Advisory Council: A group of committed individuals Advisory Council interested in supporting, but not directing, the work Dr. Gayle Broad Peter Goring of Northern Policy Institute. Leaders in their fields, they Barbara Courte Elinesky Frank Kallonen provide advice on potential researchers or points of Brian Davey Duke Peltier contact in the wider community. Tony Dean Kathryn Poling Don Drummond Peter Politis Research Advisory Board: A group of academic Tannis Drysdale (Chair) Tina Sartoretto researchers who provide guidance and input on John Fior Keith Saulnier potential research directions, potential authors, Ronald Garbutt and draft studies and commentaries. They are Northern Policy Institute’s formal link to the academic community.
  • Parry Sound: Canadian Shield and Glacier-Sculpted Gneiss in Cottage Country; Geotours Northern Ontario Series

    Parry Sound: Canadian Shield and Glacier-Sculpted Gneiss in Cottage Country; Geotours Northern Ontario Series

    Parry Sound Canadian Shield and Glacier-sculpted Gneiss in Cottage Country North of Barrie along Highway 400 the scenery changes suddenly from the rolling hills with farms and fields typical of much of southern Ontario, to a rugged and rocky landscape of rock and forests. This change marks the southern limits of the Canadian Shield, Canada’s largest and oldest geological region. This southernmost part of the Canadian Shield is the famous cottage country of Georgian Bay and Muskoka, about a 2 hour’s drive north of Toronto. The Parry Sound GeoTour tells the geological stories of this region through a description of the scenery and geology of one of its most popular sites, Killbear Provincial Park. Highway 400/69 cuts through rocky Canadian Shield terrain near Parry Sound. Canadian Shield rocks underlie a third of Canada. A typical Canadian Shield landscape in Killbear Provincial Park. Canadian Shield: the ancient core of the continent The Canadian Shield is a vast and largely unsettled region of northern and eastern Canada, known for its rocky landscapes, thin soils, and abundant lakes and bogs. The Shield forms the ancient geological core of the North American continent and has some of the oldest rocks found on Earth. These ancient rocks are largely hard and resistant granite, gneiss and volcanic rocks that were formed more than a billion years ago. Parry Sound Gneiss: the iconic rock of Georgian Bay and Muskoka Gneiss (pronounced “nice”) is the iconic rock of the Canadian Shield in Ontario’s cottage country. Gneiss is easy to distinguish from other rocks because of its alternating dark- and light-coloured layers, or bands.
  • Examining Forms of Hidden Homelessness in Rural and Northern Ontario: Comparing Experiences of Indigenous and Non-Indigenous People

    Examining Forms of Hidden Homelessness in Rural and Northern Ontario: Comparing Experiences of Indigenous and Non-Indigenous People

    Examining Forms of Hidden Homelessness in Rural And Northern Ontario: Comparing Experiences of Indigenous and Non-Indigenous People Carol Kauppi, PhD, Laurentian University Bill O’Grady, PhD, University of Guelph Rebecca Schiff, PhD, Lakehead University CAEH17, National Conference on Ending Homelessness October 26, 2017 Acknowledgements • Co-authors: • Bill O’Grady, University of Guelph • Rebecca Schiff, Lakehead University • Report: • Kauppi, C., O’Grady, B., Schiff, R., Martin, F. and Ontario Municipal Social Services Association. (2017). Homelessness and Hidden Homelessness in Rural and Northern Ontario. Guelph, ON: Rural Ontario Institute. • We acknowledge participants living with forms of homelessness in rural and northern Ontario who made this research possible. Introduction • Importance of obtaining information about the “state of homelessness” in rural and northern regions. • More attention now focused on measuring homelessness in Ontario and Canada. • Growing awareness of homelessness in communities where it was not recognized previously. • Little research conducted in rural and northern Ontario. 4 Definitions of Homelessness in the Literature • Absolute: • No home of their own or home is not suitable for human habitation (e.g., sleeping outdoors, squats). • Unsheltered • Emergency sheltered. • At Risk: • Elevated risk due circumstances such as low wages, inability to pay rent, eviction, illness, violence. • Hidden Homelessness • Invisible, concealed • Chronic: • People who have been continuously homeless for approximately 1 year or more. • Episodic: • People who frequently experience homelessness. 5 Hidden or Concealed Homelessness • The scope of hidden homelessness in small and rural areas: • “…estimated to represent 80 per cent of those who have no place to call home.” (MAH, 2015) • Hidden homelessness is more prevalent in northern, rural and small communities (Kauppi, O’Grady, Schiff, Martin & OMSSA, 2017).
  • Secondary Vegetation Succession on Jack Pine (Pinus Banksiana) Cutovers in Northeastern Ontario, Canada

    Secondary Vegetation Succession on Jack Pine (Pinus Banksiana) Cutovers in Northeastern Ontario, Canada

    Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Department of Forest Ecology U SLU Graduate Thesis in Biology 2000 T0 c, C Secondary Vegetation Succession on Jack Pine (Pinus banksiana) Cutovers in Northeastern Ontario, Canada Daniel Tiveau Supervisor: John Jeglum Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet Stencilserie nr 57 Skogsvetenskapliga fakulteten Institutionen for skogsekologi ISSN 1104-1870 901 83 UMEA ISRN SLU-SEKOL-STL-57-SE DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. Tiveau, D.: Secondary vegetation succession on jack pine (Pinus banksiana) cutovers in northeastern Ontario, Canada. Abstract The effects of different harvesting and site preparation methods on competing vegetation were studied in nine jack pine {Pinus banksiana) cutovers in northeastern Ontario, Canada. Six different treatments plus glyphosate herbiciding and no herbiciding were applied: 1) tree-length harvesting followed by trenching, and full-tree harvesting followed by five site preparations: 2) no site preparation, 3) trenching and 4) blading & compaction as well as blading followed by two planting densities, 5) 1.2m and 6) 2m. Competing vegetation was assessed preharvest and years 1, 2, 3, and 5 postharvest. Data was also available from nine juvenile sites as well as nine semimature sites. Data collection consisted of coverage values of each species as well as structural data for main life forms in height classes. Growth and health data of the planted jack pine seedlings were also available. The data was analyzed using detrended correspondence analysis (DCA), diversity indices and tabular analysis. Three years after the herbicide application there is no difference between the total coverage in the halfplots that have received herbiciding and those that have not, but an alteration of the relative abundances of species groups has developed; glyphosate herbiciding promotes grasses over shrubs.